DOCSLIB.ORG

Stewart B. Mckinney NWR Recreational Hunt Plan CD EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stewart B. Mckinney NWR Recreational Hunt Plan CD EA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting Plan March 2020 View of Salt Meadow Unit - Laura Shaffer, USFWS Appendix A- Compatibility Determination Appendix B – Environmental Assessment Appendix C – Intra-Service Section 7 Evaluation Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting Plan March 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge 733 Old Clinton Road Westbrook, CT 06498 Submitted By: Project Leader ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Concurrence: Refuge Supervisor ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Approved: Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Stewart B. McKinney NWR Recreational Hunting Plan 2 Recreational Hunting Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................4 II. Statement of Objectives .......................................................................................................6 III. Description of Hunting Program........................................................................................6 A. Areas to be Opened to Hunting .....................................................................................6 B. Species to be Taken, Hunting periods, Hunting Access .................................................8 C. Hunter Permit Requirements .........................................................................................9 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State ................................................................9 E. Law Enforcement ..........................................................................................................9 F. Funding and Staffing Requirements ............................................................................ 10 IV. Conduct of the Hunting Program..................................................................................... 10 A. Hunter Permit Application .......................................................................................... 10 B. Refuge-Specific Hunting Regulations.......................................................................... 11 C. Relevant State Regulations .......................................................................................... 11 D. Other Rules and Regulations ....................................................................................... 12 V. Public Engagement ............................................................................................................. 12 A. Outreach for Announcing and Publicizing the Hunting Program ................................. 12 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Hunting Program ................................................... 12 C. How Hunters Will Be Informed of Relevant Rules and Regulations ............................ 12 VI. Compatibility Determination............................................................................................ 13 VII. References ........................................................................................................................ 13 List of Tables 1. Table 1. [Initial Costs of Hunting Program at Stewart B. McKinney NWR] ........................... 11 2. Table 2. [Annual Costs of Hunting Programs at Stewart B. McKinney NWR] ....................... 11 Appendices Appendix A - Compatibility Determination ............................................................................ A-1 Appendix B - Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ B-1 Appendix C - Intra Service Section 7 Evaluation ..................................................................... C-1 Stewart B. McKinney NWR Recreational Hunting Plan 3 I. Introduction National wildlife refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System), the purposes of the individual refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) policy, laws, and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act (NWRSAA) of 1966, as amended by the Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and the Service Manual. Originally called Salt Meadow National Wildlife Refuge (NWR, refuge), Connecticut’s first national wildlife refuge was established in 1971 under authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act of 1934, as amended. On February 25, 1985 pursuant to Public Law 98-548, 98 Stat. 2774, the Service accepted the deed to Chimon Island from the Nature Conservancy of Connecticut. On May 13, 1987 (P.L. 100-38) the refuge was re-designated as Stewart B. McKinney NWR in honor of Congressman McKinney’s contributions to its establishment. The Connecticut Coastal Protection Act authorized the expansion of the refuge on October 19, 1990, by incorporating Salt Meadow NWR as a Unit of Stewart B. McKinney NWR and permitting future land acquisitions (P.L. 101-443, H.R. 3468). Currently, the refuge consists of 10 management units along the coast of Connecticut from Westbrook to Greenwich. Refuge units include Salt Meadow (acquired 1971) {Menunketesuck Island added as part of Salt Meadow Unit in 2005}, Falkner Island (1984), Sheffield Island (1984), Milford Point (1985), Chimon Island (1985), Goose Island (1991), Great Meadows (1994), Outer Island (1995), Calf Island (2003), and Peach Island (2005). These units are located in the towns of Westbrook, Guilford, Branford, Stratford, Bridgeport, Norwalk, and Greenwich, Connecticut. In order to meet specific refuge and other broader Service directives, the following purposes were established for Stewart B. McKinney NWR: 1. To enhance the populations of herons, egrets, terns, and other shore and wading birds within the refuge. 2. To encourage natural diversity of fish and wildlife species within the refuge. 3. To provide for the conservation of all fish and wildlife within the refuge. 4. To fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States respecting fish and wildlife. 5. To provide opportunities for scientific research, environmental education, and fish and wildlife-oriented recreation. Additionally, at the Falkner Island Unit (16 U.S.C. 742f): Stewart B. McKinney NWR Recreational Hunting Plan 4 6. “... for the development, advancement, management, conservation, and protection of fish and wildlife resources ...” 7. “... for the benefit of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, in performing its activities and services. Such acceptance may be subject to the terms of any restrictive or affirmative covenant, or condition of servitude ...” Additionally, at the Salt Meadow Unit (16 U.S.C. 715d): 8. “… for use as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any other management purpose, for migratory birds.” Due to its location within the Atlantic flyway, the refuge provides important resting, feeding and nesting habitat for many species of wading birds, waterfowl, songbirds, shorebirds, and terns. Among the many species of birds found on the refuge are the endangered roseate tern and the threatened piping plover, which rely on the refuge for crucial habitat. Although many refuge units are small in acreage, their importance to wildlife is enormous. These blocks of undeveloped saltmarsh, forest, shrub lands and near-shore islands provide thousands of resident and migratory birds with essential habitat along a highly developed coast. Stewart B. McKinney NWR provides a diverse range and numerous opportunities for rural, suburban, and urban visitors to connect with Connecticut’s rich natural and cultural history in a variety of coastal settings. This urban refuge is as an oasis for wildlife and humans temporarily distancing themselves from the densely populated and developed areas, as well as bustle of major transportation corridors on road and waterways. The mission of the Refuge System, as outlined by the NWRSAA, as amended by the Refuge System Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), is to: “... to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” The NWRSAA mandates the Secretary of the Interior in administering the System to (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(4): • Provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants, and their habitats within the NWRS; • Ensure that the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans; • Ensure that the mission of the Refuge System described at 16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(2) and the purposes of each refuge are carried out; Stewart B. McKinney NWR Recreational Hunting Plan 5 • Ensure effective coordination, interaction, and cooperation with owners of land adjoining refuges and the fish and wildlife agency of the States in which the units of the Refuge System are located; • Assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and water quality to fulfill the mission of the Refuge System and the purposes of each refuge; • Recognize compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Save the Sound (“CFE/Save the Sound”) Work to Protect and Improve the Land, Air, and Water of Connecticut and Long Island Sound
    Meghan Quinn LIS DMMP/PEIS Project Manager Corps of Engineers, New England District 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 October 16, 2015 Re: Dredge Material Management Plan Dear Ms. Quinn: Connecticut Fund for the Environment and its bi-state program Save the Sound (“CFE/Save the Sound”) work to protect and improve the land, air, and water of Connecticut and Long Island Sound. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Dredge Material Management Plan (“DMMP”) for Long Island Sound. While many agree that dredging is frequently the best means of maintaining safe channels for navigation, accessible marinas for recreation, and open ports for commerce, the material that results from this effort is often seen as a by-product to be discarded rather than a resource to be harnessed. CFE/Save the Sound supports the beneficial re-uses identified in the DMMP, particularly as a resource for habitat restoration and coastal resiliency projects. While the DMMP began the process of evaluating the wide array of beneficial re-use options, it stops far short of being a “comprehensive planning process and decision making tool.”1 Furthermore it fails to provide a sufficient path to significantly “reduce or eliminate the disposal of dredge materials in Long Island Sound,”2 the goal agreed upon by New York and Connecticut. CFE/Save the Sound has three key comments: 1) beneficial re-use is a real opportunity that requires additional assessment, project identification, and project coordination through the DMMP; 2) any economic analysis used to determine the “feasibility,” “practicability,” or “viability” of any project, must also include the environmental cost of using the Sound as a disposal facility to fairly reflect the true cost of disposal; and 3) additional information on the impact of disturbing, transporting, and disposing of nitrogen rich soils must be developed, analyzed, and monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • With MUNICIPAL COASTAL PROGRAM
    I I ,I I with MUNICIPAL COASTAL PROGRAM... WESTBROOK CONNECTICUT ( ... ( / ~..; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Background information was supplied in part by the response to a town-wide survey, the results of which were compiled by the Connecticut River Estuary Regional Planning Agency. Additional background information was supplied by information reported and compiled by CRERPA and various town and state agencies. The Planning Commission wishes to acknowledge the work of Ms. Jenny Aley in drafting maps and information on open space and national resource protection. The natural resource factor maps and base property line maps are invaluable planning tools which can be used by all boards, departments, and citizens of the Town of Westbrook. Ms. Aley is a graduate of the Yale School of Forestry. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Preface A. What a Plan of Development Is ................................................................................1 B. Municipal Coastal Program.......................................................................................1 C. Overview of Goals.....................................................................................................2 II. People and Place, Background of the Plan of Development A. History............................................................................... .......................................4 B. Geography ...................................... .................................. .......................................5 C. Population and Housing ............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A-Water Quality-Town Of
    Appendix A Water Quality – Town of Greenwich Town of Greenwich Drainage Manual February 2012 [This page left intentionally blank] Impaired Water Bodies – Town of Greenwich Water Body Impaired Segment Location Cause Potential Source Segment Designated Use Size From mouth at Greenwich Harbor (just downstream [DS] of I95 crossing, at exit Habitat for Fish, Horseneck 5.78 3 offramp), US to Putnam Lake Other Aquatic Cause Unknown Source Unknown Brook-01 Miles Reservoir outlet dam (just upstream [US] Life and Wildlife of Dewart Road crossing) From head of tide (US of Route 1 Habitat for Fish, Sources Outside State Jurisdiction or Borders, Source crossing, at INLET to ponded portion of Other Aquatic Cause Unknown Unknown, Highway/Road/Bridge Runoff (Non- Byram River- river, just DS of Upland Street East 0.49 Life and Wildlife construction Related) 01 area), US to Pemberwick outlet dam (US Miles Illicit Connections/Hook-ups to Storm Sewers, Source of Comly Avenue crossing, and US of Recreation Escherichia coli Unknown confluence with Pemberwick Brook Putnam Lake Habitat for Fish, Impoundment of Horseneck Brook, just 95.56 Alterations in wetland Reservoir Other Aquatic Habitat Modification - other than Hydromodification south of Rt. 15 Acres habitats (Greenwich) Life and Wildlife Western portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Dissolved oxygen LIS WB Inner - upper Indian Harbor (lower portion of Habitat for 0.025 saturation; Nutrient/ Residential Districts, Municipal Point Source Indian Harbor Greenwich Creek) from Davis Avenue Marine Fish, Square Eutrophication Discharges, Non-Point Source, Unspecified Urban (upper), crossing, US to saltwater limit at West Other Aquatic Miles Biological Indicators; Stormwater Greenwich Brother Drive crossing (includes I95 Life and Wildlife Oxygen, Dissolved crossing).
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Population Dynamics of Roseate Terns (Sterna Dougallii) In
    Ecological Modelling 368 (2018) 298–311 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Modelling j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel Modeling population dynamics of roseate terns (Sterna dougallii) in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean a,b,c,∗ d e b Manuel García-Quismondo , Ian C.T. Nisbet , Carolyn Mostello , J. Michael Reed a Research Group on Natural Computing, University of Sevilla, ETS Ingeniería Informática, Av. Reina Mercedes, s/n, Sevilla 41012, Spain b Dept. of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA c Darrin Fresh Water Institute, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, 307 MRC, Troy, NY 12180, USA d I.C.T. Nisbet & Company, 150 Alder Lane, North Falmouth, MA 02556, USA e Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The endangered population of roseate terns (Sterna dougallii) in the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean consists Received 12 September 2017 of a network of large and small breeding colonies on islands. This type of fragmented population poses an Received in revised form 5 December 2017 exceptional opportunity to investigate dispersal, a mechanism that is fundamental in population dynam- Accepted 6 December 2017 ics and is crucial to understand the spatio-temporal and genetic structure of animal populations. Dispersal is difficult to study because it requires concurrent data compilation at multiple sites. Models of popula- Keywords: tion dynamics in birds that focus on dispersal and include a large number of breeding sites are rare in Roseate terns literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec. 15-121-C1. Transportation of Hazardous Substances In
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies Sec. 15-121-C1. Transportation of hazardous substances in Connecticut waters (a) No vessel, regardless of tonnage size, or manner of propulsion, and whether self- propelled or not, transporting oil or other hazardous substance in bulk shall navigate in Connecticut waters in Long Island Sound north of a “Shore Clearance Line” except when, in the judgment of the master, the safety of the vessel, cargo or crew would be jeopardized and except further that a course not less than sixty degrees north of the Shore Clearance Line may be taken when making an approach to the channel entrance at a port of call or in departing from same and except further that a vessel may navigate north of the Shore Clearance Line at Long Sand Shoal when making an approach to the Connecticut River. (b) Oil means oil of any kind or in any form, including but not limited to petroleum, fuel oil, sludge, oil refuse, and oil mixed with wastes other than dredge spoil; hazardous substance means any liquid cargo which is inflammable or combustible or which, when discharged in any quantity into or upon the waters of Connecticut causes or is likely to cause significant damage to the environmental resources of Connecticut, including but not limited to, fish, shellfish, wildlife, shorelines, and beaches; Shore Clearance Line means a series of straight lines connecting sequentially the following navigation aids as numbered and described in Coast Guard Light List (CG-158) Volume I, Atlantic Coast (1972): Number Description Nearest Locality 981 Parsonage Point Lighted Buoy 40 Mamaroneck, N.Y 976 The Cows Lighted Bell Buoy 32 Stamford, Conn.
    [Show full text]
  • Boater's Guide
    FULL SERVICE MARINA YAMAHA CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS GROTON, CT 50’ SLIPS AVAILABLE FOR 2019! (860) 445-9729 WINTER STORAGE • NEWLY DREDGED • FLOATING DOCKS www.PineIslandMarina.com MYSTIC, CT TRANSIENTS WELCOME! (860) 536-6647 SEASONAL DOCKAGE AVAILABLE FOR 2019 www.FortRachel.com • WINTER INDOOR & OUTDOOR STORAGE • FULL SERVICE BOAT YARD • POWER & SAIL • SHRINKWRAPPING • HAULING UP TO 70 TON & 20’ BEAM • WINTERIZATION CHESTER, CT (860) 526-1661 HEATED INDOOR BOAT STORAGE www.ChesterPointMarina.com RESERVE A SLIP INSTANTLY OUR FAMILY OF MARINAS ©2018 blp MARINE, LLC and All Subsidiary Logos. All Rights Reserved. 2 2019 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE Take Us With You On the Water UNLIMITED TOWING MEMBERSHIP $159 Breakdowns happen all the time and the average cost of a tow is around $700. But with an Unlimited Towing Membership from TowBoatU.S., just show your card and your payment is made. With 600+ boats in 300+ ports, you’re never far from assistance when you need it. GET THE BOATU.S. APP FOR ONE TOUCH TOWING GO ONLINE NOW TO JOIN! BoatUS.com/Towing or 800-395-2628 Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree or by calling. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2019 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE A digest of boating laws and regulations Department of Energy & Environmental Protection State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Michael Lambert, Bureau Chief Acting Boating Director Department of Energy & Environmental Protection ✦ ✦ ✦ Robert Klee, Commissioner Editor Susan Whalen, Deputy Commissioner COVER PHOTO: MARK CHANSKI Michael Lambert, Bureau Chief Mark Chanski Boating Resource Technician Sarah E is a single engine, 36’ Baltzer Voyageur.
    [Show full text]
  • A Q U I F E R P R O T E C T I O N a R E a S N O R W a L K , C O N N E C T I C
    !n !n S c Skunk Pond Beaver Brook Davidge Brook e d d k h P O H R R O F p S o i d t n n l c t u i l R a T S d o i ll l t e e lv i d o t R r r d r l h t l l a H r n l t r M b a s b R d H e G L R o r re R B C o o u l e t p o n D o e f L i s Weston Intermediate School y l o s L d r t e Huckleberry Hills Brook e t d W d r e g Upper Stony Brook Pond N L D g i b R o s n Ridgefield Pond a t v d id e g e H r i l Country Club Pond b e a R d r r S n n d a g e L o n tin a d ! R d l H B n t x H e W Still Pond d t n Comstock Knoll u d a R S o C R k R e L H d i p d S n a l l F tt h Town Pond d l T te r D o e t l e s a t u e L e c P n n b a n l R g n i L t m fo D b k H r it to Lower Stony Brook Pond o r A d t P n d s H t F u d g L d d i Harrisons Brook R h e k t R r a e R m D l S S e e G E o n y r f ll H rt R r b i i o e n s l t ld d d o r l ib l a e r R d L r O e H w i Fanton Hill g r l Cider Mill School P y R n a ll F i e s w L R y 136 e a B i M e C H k A s t n d o i S d V l n 3 c k r l t g n n a d R i u g d o r a L 3 ! a l r u p d R d e c L S o s e Hurlbutt Elementary School R d n n d D A i K w T n d o O n D t f R l g d R l t ad L i r e R e e r n d L a S i m a o f g n n n D d n R o t h n Middlebrook School ! l n t w Lo t a 33 i n l n i r E id d D w l i o o W l r N e S a d l e P g n V n a h L C r L o N a r N a S e n e t l e b n l e C s h f ! d L nd g o a F i i M e l k rie r id F C a F r w n P t e r C ld l O e r a l y v f e u e o O n e o a P i O i s R w e t n a e l a n T t b s l d l N l k n t g i d u o e a o R W R Hasen Pond n r r n M W B y t Strong
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Populations of Terns and Skimmers on Long Island Sound and Eastern Long Island: 1972-19751
    1974-1977 No. 73 PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNA A SOCIETY OF NEW YORK For the Three Years Ending March 1977 Date of Issue: August 1977 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Members who participated in editing this issue of the Proceedings were: Berry Baker, Eugene Eisenmann, John Farrand, Jr., and Mary LeCroy. The Committee wishes to thank Alice Oliveri for typing manuscripts. Catherine Pessino, Editor Breeding Populations of Terns and Skimmers on Long Island Sound and Eastern Long Island: 1972-19751 DAVID DUFFY By 1972, it had become apparent to many working on colonial sea­ birds that the nesting terns and skimmers of Long Island were being increasingly exposed to a broad spectrum of pressures that might be causing severe changes in their populations. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) had been implicated in birth deformities of Common and Roseate Terns (Sterna hirundo and S. dougallii; Hays and Risebrough 1972). Mercury had been linked to feather loss in young terns (Gochfeld 1971). Egg shell thinning had been noted at several colonies in the area (Hays, pers. com.; pers. obs.); such thinning is believed to be caused by deriva­ tives of DDT (Wiemeyer and Porter 1970; Peakall 1970). Further pressure on tern populations had come from invasions of nesting sites by rats, development of recreational beaches, human harassment, and natural suc­ cession rendering colony sites unfit for nesting. For all of these factors there were only scattered and often anecdotal accounts of acute situations. What, if any, long-term effect there might be for the tern populations was unknown. Were Common and Roseate Terns holding their own? Or were they, instead, retreating to a few, safe colonies as their populations declined? Little as we knew of Commons and Rose­ ates, we knew even less of what was happening to Least Terns (Sterna albifrons) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 CT IWQR Appendix
    1 Appendix A-3. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Estuaries Connecticut 2018 305b Assessment Results Estuaries Appendix A-3 Waterbody Waterbody Square Segment ID Name Location Miles Aquatic Life Recreation Shellfish Shellfish Class See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, Patchogue and Menunketesuck Rivers Patchogue And from mouths at Grove Beach Point, US to saltwater Menunketesuc limits just above I95 crossing, and at I95 crossing NOT Direct CT-C1_001 k Rivers respectively, Westbrook. 0.182 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Consumption See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, SB water of inner Clinton Harbor, Inner Clinton including mouths of Hammonasset, Indian, Harbor, Hammock Rivers, and Dudley Creek (includes NOT FULLY Commercial CT-C1_002-SB Clinton Esposito Beach), Clinton. 0.372 SUPPORTING UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hammonasset River SB water from LIS CB Inner - mouth at inner Clinton Harbor, US to SA/SB water Hammonasset quality line between Currycross Road and RR track, NOT Commercial CT-C1_003-SB River, Clinton Clinton. 0.072 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting 2 See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hayden Creek SB water from mouth LIS CB Inner - at Hammonasset River (parallel with Pratt Road), US Hayden Creek, to saltwater limit near Maple Avenue (off Route 1), NOT Commercial CT-C1_004-SB Clinton Clinton. 0.009 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, (DISCONTINUOUS SEGMENT) SA LIS CB Inner - water of upper Hammonasset, Indian, Hammock Clinton Harbor Rivers, Dudley Creek and other small tributaries, (SA Inputs), from SA/SB water quality line, US to saltwater NOT Direct CT-C1_005 Clinton limits, Clinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart B. Mckinney National Wildlife Refuge ©Photos by Susan, Susan Drew Roseate Tern
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge ©Photos By Susan, Susan Drew Roseate tern Represented by Members of Congress: Purpose U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Senator Christopher J. Dodd (D) The refuge was established as a 1 800/344 WILD Senator Joseph I. Lieberman (D) breeding ground for migratory birds http://www.fws.gov Rep. Robert Simmons (R-2nd) and other wildlife, for research, and for Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-3rd) education. May 2006 Rep. Christopher Shays (R-4th) Public Use Notes Contact n Visitor contact station Andrew C. French, Project Leader n Interpretive nature trails Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge 733 Old Clinton Road Westbrook, CT 06498 Phone: 860/399 2513 Fax: 860/399 2515 Highlights and Potapaug Audubon Society jointly TDD: 800/877 8339 The refuge established two new units, produced a brochure detailing projects E-mail: [email protected] Menunketesuck Island (4.6 acres) and and volunteer opportunities. The Peach Island (2.6 acres) and added refuge has $47,000 available to begin The refuge is administratively complexed another 16 acres to the Salt Meadow making improvements outlined in the under Silvio O. Conte National Fish and unit. new public access concept. Wildlife Refuge. The refuge will host a Youth The Falkner Island unit supports Management Activities Conservation Corps program in the one of the last colonies of federally n Provide technical and financial Stratford and Bridgeport area. endangered roseate terns and 97% support through the Partners for of nesting common terns in the state. Fish and Wildlife Program to help Removing about 160,000 cubic yards The refuge has $150,000 available landowners protect wetland of fill reclaimed over 42 acres of salt to rehabilitate the jetty, pier and habitat in Connecticut marsh and restored the natural tidal boathouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishrpt16 080411.Pdf
    FISHING REPORT NUMBER 16 8/4/2011 INLAND REPORT LARGEMOUTH BASS fishing is variable, ranging from good to slow. The best reports are from Pachaug Pond (good action, and recent catches a 5.5 lb bass), Lake Lillinonah (catches include several bass in the 4- 5 lb range), Candlewood Lake (a number of catches in the 4-5 lb range), Bantam Lake, Gorton Pond (catches include a 5.75 lb largemouth), Mudge Pond, Hatch Pond (decent action, no lunkers), Quaddick Reservoir, Gardner Lake, Mansfield Hollow Reservoir (good action, nothing big), and fair reports from Lake IMPORTANT NOTICE McDonough, Lake Saltonstall, Beach Pond (catches TO ANGLERS AND BOATERS- include a 6.24 lb largemouth), Middle Bolton Lake, Zebra mussels were recently (October, 2010) Lower Bolton Lake, Black Pond (Woodstock), found in Lake Zoar and Lake Lillinonah. Quinebaug River, Powers Lake and Wonoskopomuc Prior to this discovery, zebra mussels had been found Lake. Slow fishing reported from Halls Pond, Lake (1998) in CT only in East Twin Lake and West Twin Lake (Salisbury). Anglers fishing in any of these waters Quonnipaug and Amos Lake. Other places for bass and western Connecticut in general should use extra include Stillwater Pond, Batterson Park Pond, Red care to avoid transporting water, aquatic vegetation, Cedar Lake, Park Pond, Winchester Lake, Crystal Lake, and possibly zebra mussels to new locations. Rogers Lake, Pickerel Lake, Ball Pond, Pattagansett This highly invasive mussel can disrupt aquatic Lake, Uncas Lake and Mashapaug Lake. ecosystems and is notorious for clogging water intakes and fouling boat hulls and engine cooling water systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]