DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 14/Monday, January 25, 2021/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 14/Monday, January 25, 2021/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 6871 Notification to Importers 32. Master Steel Corporation Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 33. MCK Co., Ltd. This notice serves as a preliminary On November 12, 2019, based on timely 34. MS Pipe Co., Ltd. requests for review, in accordance with reminder to importers of their 35. Msteel Co., Ltd. responsibility under 19 CFR 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 36. Nexen Corporation administrative review of the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 37. NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. regarding the reimbursement of 38. Pneumatic Plus Korea Co., Ltd. antidumping duty order on cold-rolled 1 antidumping duties prior to liquidation 39. POSCO International Corporation steel from Korea for 38 companies. of the relevant entries during this POR. 40. PSG Co., Ltd. Commerce selected Hyundai and 41. Pusan Fitting Corporation POSCO/POSCO International Failure to comply with this requirement 2 could result in Commerce’s 42. SeAH FS Co., Ltd. Corporation (hereafter, POSCO/PIC) as 43. SeAH Steel Corporation presumption that reimbursement of the two mandatory respondents in this 44. Sejong Ind. Co., Ltd. 3 antidumping duties occurred and the review. On February 5, 2020, the 45. Seokyoung Steel & Technology Co., Ltd. petitioners 4 withdrew their request for subsequent assessment of double 46. SIC Tube Co., Ltd. antidumping duties. review of all companies except for 47. ST Tubular Inc. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd., Dongbu 48. Sungkwang Bend Co., Ltd. Notification to Interested Parties 49. TGS Pipe Co., Ltd. Steel Co., Ltd., Hyundai, POSCO, PDW, 5 The preliminary results of this 50. TJ Glovsteel Co., Ltd. and PIC. administrative review are issued and 51. TSP Corporation On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled published in accordance with sections 52. Union Pipe MFG Co., Ltd. all deadlines in administrative reviews 6 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 53. WSG Co., Ltd. by 50 days. On July 20, 2020, CFR 351.221(b)(4). [FR Doc. 2021–01498 Filed 1–22–21; 8:45 am] Commerce extended the deadline for the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P preliminary results by 100 days, in Dated: January 15, 2021. accordance with 751(a)(3)(A) of the Jeffrey I. Kessler, Act.7 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE all deadlines in administrative reviews Compliance. by an additional 60 days.8 On December Appendix I International Trade Administration 3, 2020, in accordance with section [A–580–881] 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary extended the preliminary results of Decision Memorandum Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products I. Summary From the Republic of Korea: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and II. Background Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR III. Scope of the Order Preliminary Results of Antidumping 61011 (November 12, 2019) (Initiation Notice). IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 2 POSCO reported that the company formerly V. Affiliation 2019 known as Daewoo International Corporation (DWI) VI. Discussion of Methodology and POSCO Daewoo (PDW) now does business as VII. Currency Conversion AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, PIC. See POSCO/PDW’s Letter, ‘‘Cold-Rolled Steel VIII. Recommendation International Trade Administration, Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2018– Department of Commerce. 2019: POSCO’s Respondent Selection Comments,’’ Appendix II dated December 11, 2019, at 2–3. In its SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce questionnaire response, POSCO subsequently List of Companies Not Individually (Commerce) preliminarily determines reported that PDW became PIC on March 18, 2019. Examined that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) See POSCO Section A Initial Questionnaire 1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. and POSCO/POSCO International Response, dated February 18, 2020 at 1 and A–1. 2. Blue Sea Precision Tube Co., Ltd. Based on our analysis in the instant review, we are Corporation (PIC), the two companies preliminarily collapsing POSCO and PIC, which we 3. Bo Myung Metal Co., Ltd. selected for individual examination, did find to be the successor-in-interest to PDW. See 4. BUMA CE Co., Ltd. not sell certain cold-rolled steel flat Memorandum, ‘‘Third Administrative Review of 5. Busung Steel Co., Ltd. products (cold-rolled steel) from the Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic 6. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. of Korea: POSCO and POSCO International 7. Daeho P&C Co., Ltd. Republic of Korea (Korea) in the United Corporation Affiliation and Collapsing 8. Daou Precision Ind. Co. States at prices below normal value Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with these 9. Dongyang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. during the period of review (POR) preliminary results. Accordingly, hereafter we refer 10. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. September 1, 2018 through August 31, to the collapsed entity as ‘‘POSCO/PIC.’’ 3 11. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 2019. Interested parties are invited to See Memorandum, ‘‘2018–2019 Administrative 12. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. Review of Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the comment on these preliminary results. Republic of Korea: Respondent Selection,’’ dated 13. Global Solutions Co., Ltd. DATES: Applicable January 25, 2021. January 15, 2020. 14. Hansol Metal Co., Ltd. 4 The petitioners are ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK 15. HiSteel Co., Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, Steel 16. HPP Co., Ltd. Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation 17. Husteel Co., Ltd. Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, (collectively, the petitioners). 18. Hyundai Group Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Cold-Rolled Steel Flat 19. Hyundai Corporation International Trade Administration, Products from the Republic of Korea: Petitioners’ 20. Hyundai HYSCO Partial Withdrawal of Request for Review,’’ dated 21. Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 February 5, 2020. 22. Hyundai Steel Company Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 23. ILJIN Steel Corporation DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 24. Keonwoo Metals Co., Ltd. (202) 482–1167, or (202) 482–5019, Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 25. K Steel Corporation respectively. 2020. 26. KF UBIS Co., Ltd. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for 27. Korea Steel Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 28. Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. Background Administrative Review,’’ dated July 20, 2020. 29. KPF Co., Ltd. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 30. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd. These preliminary results are made in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 31. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. accordance with section 751 of the Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Jan 22, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 6872 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices review by an additional 18 days, until Order, see the Preliminary Decision individually examined (i.e., KG Dongbu January 15, 2021.9 Memorandum. Steel Co., Ltd.).16 On October 7, 2020, Commerce Methodology Preliminary Results of Review published a notice in the Federal Register partially rescinding the instant Commerce is conducting this review Commerce preliminarily determines administrative review of 32 companies in accordance with sections 751(a) of that, for the period September 1, 2018 based on the petitioners’ timely the Act. Commerce has calculated through August 31, 2019, the following withdrawal of their requests for review constructed export prices in accordance weighted-average dumping margins of those companies.10 The with section 772 of the Act. Normal exist: administrative review will continue value is calculated in accordance with 11 Weighted- with respect to KG Dongbu Steel, section 773 of the Act. Commerce average Hyundai, and POSCO/PIC. preliminarily finds that a cost-based Producer or exporter dumping For a complete description of the particular market situation (PMS) margin (percent) events that followed the initiation of existed in Korea during the POR concerning the cost of hot-rolled coil this administrative review, see the Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 12 (HRC) as a component of the cost of Preliminary Decision Memorandum. POSCO/POSCO International A list of topics discussed in the production for the cold-rolled steel that Corporation ............................. 0.00 Preliminary Decision Memorandum is Hyundai Steel and POSCO/PIC KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd ......... 0.00 14 included as an appendix to this notice. produced. Specifically, we quantified The Preliminary Decision Memorandum the impact of the PMS on the material Disclosure, Public Comment, and is a public document and is on file cost of HRC, and derived a Opportunity To Request a Hearing electronically via Enforcement and corresponding adjustment factor that, when applied to the cost of HRC, We intend to disclose the calculations Compliance’s Antidumping and performed for these preliminary results Countervailing Duty Centralized accounts for the distortions induced by 15 of review within five days of the date of Electronic Service System (ACCESS). the observed PMS. For a full description of the methodology publication of this notice in the Federal ACCESS is available to registered users Register, in accordance with 19 CFR at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR complete version of the Preliminary 351.309(c), interested parties may Decision Memorandum can be accessed Rate for Non-Examined Company submit case briefs no later than 30 days directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ after the date of publication of this frn/. The signed and the electronic The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the notice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Case No. KR-2000221
    (Seoul Office) ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Case No. KR-2000221 Complainants1: Hyundai Motor Company Complainants2: Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. (Authorized Representative for Complainants 1,2 : Patent Attorney Sung-Pil HWANG (E.M. HWANG & PARTNERS)) Respondent: Imad Boukai (Authorized Representative for Respondent : Changhoon Lee (AJU Kim Chang & Lee)) Disputed Domain Name(s): hyundaitechnology.com 1. The Parties and Contested Domain Name The Complainants are Hyundai Motor Company of 12, Heolleung-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul (Yangjae-dong), Republic of Korea and Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. of 75, Yulgok-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul(Gye-dong), Republic of Korea. The Authorized Representative of Complainants is Sung-Pil Hwang, E.M. HWANG & PARTNERS, Mansung Building, 9-8, Gaepo-ro 31-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Respondent is Imad Boukai, General Procurement, Inc. (“GPI”), 800 East Dyer, Santa Ana, California, US. Page 1 The Authorized Representative of the Respondent is Changhoon Lee, AJU Kim Chang & Lee, 7-14th Floor, Donghee Building, 302 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 06253, Republic of Korea. The domain name at issue is ‘hyundaitechnology.com’(the “disputed domain name”), registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. 2. Procedural History The Complainants was filed with the Seoul Office of the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC, the “Center”) on September 14, 2020, seeking for a cancellation of the disputed domain name. On September 25, 2020, the Center sent an email to the Registrar asking for the detailed data of the registrant. On September 26, 2020, GoDaddy.com, LLC transmitted by email to the Center its verification response, advising that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Steel Announces Merger with Hyundai Hysco
    Steel (Overweight/Maintain) Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco: Deal to be finalized on July 1 st , 2015 News Comment Merger likely to create only limited synergies April 9, 2015 Recommended strategy: Buy POSCO st Daewoo Securities CCo.,o., Ltd. Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco; Deal to be finalized on July 1 [Steel/Non-ferrous metal] On April 8th, Hyundai Steel announced it has decided to merge with Hyundai Hysco. Hyundai Hysco shareholders will receive 0.8577607 shares of Hyundai Steel for each existing Hyundai Seung-hun Jeon Hysco share they own. Dissenting shareholders will be able to exercise appraisal rights at +822-768-2713 W72,100 per share for Hyundai Steel and W63,552 per share for Hyundai Hysco, which are, [email protected] respectively, 9.2% and 6.4% lower than current share prices. The 2,667,762 shares Hyundai Hysco owns in Hyundai Steel will be allocated to Hyundai Hysco shareholders, which will have the same impact as cancelling 2% of treasury shares. As a result, the merged company will have 133,445,785 shares outstanding (rather than 136,113,547 shares). Merger likely to create only limited synergies In our view, the merger effects are more psychological than tangible. While the merger does have some benefits, we also see several negative effects that could partially offset the positives. We believe potential merger synergies between the two companies were mostly realized after Hyundai Hysco spun off its cold-rolled coil (CRC) division to Hyundai Steel in December 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • April 9, 2015
    April 9, 2015 KOREA Sector News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Steel (Overweight) KOSPI 2,058.87 -0.39 -0.02 Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco KOSPI 200 258.33 -0.18 -0.07 KOSDAQ 676.96 8.93 1.34 Economy & Strategy Update Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) April MPC Volume Value KOSPI 519,429 5,805 Expectations for a rate cut remain intact KOSPI 200 84,005 3,924 KOSDAQ 579,044 3,700 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,285,499 KOSDAQ 180,759 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,421 1,349 72 Institutional 963 1,227 -264 Retail 3,371 3,188 184 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 235 185 50 Institutional 179 186 -7 Retail 3,275 3,317 -42 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 839 887 -49 KOSDAQ 35 39 -4 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 455 359 57 KOSDAQ 613 369 58 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 1,483,000 4,000 251 Hynix 41,900 -700 234 KODEX LEVERAGE 11,435 -25 155 LG Chem 254,000 12,500 128 NHN 653,000 8,000 115 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Daum Communications 110,300 3,200 152 Sansung P&C 91,800 11,900 136 GOLFZON 15,450 2,000 131 Coreana Cosmetics 7,920 380 89 Celltrion 73,500 -1,200 83 Note: As of April 9, 2015 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Daewoo Securities Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Sungwoo Hitech (015750 KQ) Compelling Story and Cheap Valuation
    Sungwoo Hitech (015750 KQ) Compelling story and cheap valuation Auto 4Q13 review: Strong Chinese sales drive earnings beat Sungwoo Hitech’s 4Q13 earnings beat the market consensus, with revenue of Results Comment W802.6bn (+3.1% YoY) and operating profit of W72.6bn (+60.7% YoY). OP margin came March 17, 2014 in at 9.0% (the highest level in recent quarters), which beat our estimate of 7.8%. We primarily attribute the earnings beat to stronger-than-expected contributions from the firm’s Chinese operations, which we ascribe to solid sales by Hyundai Motor (HMC) and (Maintain) Buy Kia Motors in the country. We also believe Sungwoo Hitech’s European operations saw a solid earnings recovery due to pricing adjustments after a weak 1H13. Target Price (12M, W) 21,000 Pretax profit reached W83bn (+103.4% YoY), and net profit came in at W56bn (+117.7% YoY) thanks to a one-time gain of W30bn related to Sungwoo Hitech’s Share Price (03/14/14, W) 16,150 Hyundai Hysco securities holdings, which offset F/X-related losses. Expected Return 30% 2014 outlook Sungwoo Hitech is the largest supplier of automobile body parts to HMC’s and Kia OP (13P, Wbn) 213 Motors’ overseas operations (excluding the US and Brazil). Sungwoo Hitech’s main Consensus OP (13F, Wbn) 190 overseas businesses are in China, Eastern Europe (Czech Republic and Slovakia), Russia, and India. 67% of Sungwoo Hitech’s consolidated revenue comes from China (35%) and EPS Growth (13P, %) -2.4 Russia (32%), and only 29% is derived from Korean operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Motor Company I 2009 Annual Report
    HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY I 2009 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 I INTRO 12 I FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 14 I MESSAGE FROM THE CEO 18 I TO TRUTH (Business Performance Results & Vision) 28 I TO POWER (Global Management & Marketing) 36 I HYUNDAI WITH THE WORLD 46 I TO FUTURE (Sustainable Management) 56 I HYUNDAI WITH HONESTY (Corporate Governance & Financial Statements) 148 I SUPPLEMENT 152 I FROM HYUNDAI From TAU 4.6 V8 Engine To The Ideal Ca r From The Ideal Ca r To Real Happiness From Real Happiness To Humans, Nature, Society Good technology makes good cars and happier people. Happier people go on to spread their happiness to the rest of the world. We know how even a small idea of Hyundai Motor Company can change the world in a big way. In this way, we continue to do all we can do to be even better. From TAU 4.6 V8 Engine Hyundai Motor’s new technologies To The Ideal Car Creating your dream cars From The Ideal Car Creating your dream cars To Real Happiness Making people happier From Real Happiness Making people happier To Humans, Nature, Society Creating a more humane society and a cleaner environment INTRO I FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS I MESSAGE FROM THE CEO I TO TRUTH I TO POWER I HYUNDAI WITH THE WORLD I TO FUTURE I HYUNDAI WITH HONESTY I SUPPLEMENT I FROM HYUNDAI >> FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS CONSOLIDATED PERFORMANCE SEGMENT INFORMATION Korean Won in millions U. S. Dollars in thousands Sales Vehicle Sales 2007 2008 2009 2009 Unit (‘000) (HMC) 5,000 Financial Korea For the Year : Services % 6% Other 22.5 Sales 69,601,516 79,736,351 91,463,064 78,334,245
    [Show full text]
  • Your Partner, Hyundai Engineering 2010~2011 HYUNDAI ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY REPORT About This Report
    Your Partner, Hyundai Engineering 2010~2011 HYUNDAI ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY REPORT About this Report Reporting Information This is the second sustainability report published by Hyundai Engineering, which includes its efforts for sustainable growth and performances in the economic, en- vironmental and social areas. This report will serve as the momentum for the ex- amination of the sustainable management, and Hyundai Engineering hopes this second publication becomes a communication channel for co-development with stakeholders. Reporting Scope and Period This report covers activities and performances of Hyundai Engineering’s sustain- able management for two years from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011. Reporting and Assurance Standards This report was prepared in accordance with the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) G3.1 Guidelines together with the guidance on ISO 26000 and UNGC. The reliability of the contents was verified through the DNV Protocol for Verification of Sustainability Reporting V.3.0 standard by DNV, a third-party assurance institute. For more details about the result, please refer to the third-party verification report. Detailed Information on the Report This report in PDF version is available from the website. For more information or inquiries on this report, please contact: Team CSR Representative, Planning Team, Planning Office E-mail [email protected] Tel 82-2-2166-3824 Fax 82-2-2646-1503 Website www.hec.co.kr Address Hyundai 41 Tower Bldg., 917-9, Mok 1-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Korea Philosophy A blueprint connecting the past, present and future of Hyundai Motor Group Since its establishment Hyundai Motor Group has built a history of success based on challenge and passion.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Hyundai
    History of Hyundai http://santafemods.com/History/History%20of%20Hyundai.htm Abstract Taking pride in your car by driving it and admiring it is one thing, actually knowing its history is quite another. The Hyundai Motor Company is one if not the most dynamic automobile producer in any developing country. This is remarkable considering that the company is closing in on 40 years of existence. To outline its history one must also look into the life and times of its founder Chung Ju-Yung. It cannot be told without the outlining the founders rise from the rice fields of Korea to the circumstances that let him to acquire the knowledge and determination that led to the creation of one of the fastest growing family owned businesses into a global competitor. His creation of numerous companies eventually let to the establishment of the Hyundai Group. The Hyundai Motor Company was one of these. He created it and transformed it from a mere assembler of Ford models to a designer and exporter of its own cars and engines in less than four decades. It has already become a major global player with plants and dealerships that span six continents. The company is one of the largest and most diversified business organizations with 45 affiliated domestic companies and 254 overseas companies in nearly 200 countries. The Hyundai Motor Company is but one which the Group is active in such as shipbuilding, steel, petrochemicals, heavy machinery, aerospace, electronics and financial services. These pages therefore outlines not only the rich and unique History of the Hyundai Motor Company but also the remarkable years beforehand that led to its creation, the eventual breakup of the Group and its continuous development into a top ten global automaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Sales Manager – Colorado Springs CO
    Sales Manager – Colorado Springs CO This position is open to Veterans, Transitioning Military, USAR, NG, Military Spouses, Spouses of Veterans, and Caregivers of War Wounded To apply for this position, please visit VetJobs.org or MilitarySpouseJobs.org and navigate to the RC Job Board under the Jobs tab. Search for Req # 300201BR Direct link: https://jobs.brassring.com/1033/ASP/TG/cim_jobdetail.asp?partnerid=16030&siteid=6090 &Areq=300201BR https://jobs.brassring.com/1033/ASP/TG/cim_jobdetail.asp?partnerid=16030 &siteid=6090&Areq=300201BR > All positions are open until filled unless otherwise noted. JOB DESCRIPTION: The Sales Manager hires, trains and develops new and existing sales representatives, ensuring that Bass Pro Shops customers are provided with outstanding service through sales and marketing efforts – such as generating leads and offering and selling OPC tours and vacation getaways to Bass Pro Shops customers. The Manager works to maintain a positive relationship with Bass Pro Shops management and associates serving as a good steward of the Bass Pro Shops brand. Specific Duties, Activities and Responsibilities • Recruits, hires, trains, schedules, coaches and motivates sales associates. Delivers a one-on-one conversation weekly with each sales associate. Develops sales associates for success in their position and future growth. • Responsible for the work performance of the staff in how they deliver the sales pitch and ensuring that the Company approved training program “Passport to Success” is delivered to all associates. Although significant support and resources are provided, it is the responsibility of the manager to ensure that the standards and policies of both Bluegreen and our partners are upheld.
    [Show full text]
  • HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD Non-Consolidated Financial
    HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD Non-Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2009 and 2008 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) Contents Page Independent Auditors’ Report 1 Non-Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 2 Non-Consolidated Statements of Income 4 Non-Consolidated Statements of Appropriation of Retained Earnings 5 Non-Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity 6 Non-Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 8 Notes to Non-Consolidated Financial Statements 10 Independent Accountants’ Review Report on Internal Accounting Control System 53 Independent Auditors’ Report Based on a report originally issued in Korean The Board of Directors and Stockholders Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd: We have audited the accompanying non-consolidated statements of financial position of Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related non-consolidated statements of income, appropriation of retained earnings, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These non- consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these non-consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the Republic of Korea. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: the 1997-98 Crisis and Its Aftermath
    5 The 1997-98 Crisis and Its Aftermath The Crisis in Korea Unfolds The 1997 Asian financial crisis, in which Korea figures importantly but not exclusively, has become one of the most written-about subjects in contem- porary economics. Thus, I have no intention here of repeating in any depth what is covered well elsewhere; rather, only a summary of main events follows.1 Views among analysts vary as to exactly why the crisis in Korea occurred. Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998), for example, argue that the crisis in Korea was almost entirely a result of volatility of international financial flows. They claim that the “fundamentals” of the Korean economy were sound and that there was no reason, apart from the withdrawal of funds from Korea by international investors, why the econ- omy should have undergone the crisis that in fact did occur. This interpretation is, of course, somewhat at variance with the story told here. Without question, the classical macroeconomic fundamentals of Korea appeared sound in the middle of 1997; inflation was low, there was a government fiscal surplus, overall growth was positive, and the balance of payments on the current account, while in deficit, was not seriously so 1. For more detailed descriptions and analyses of the crisis, the reader should see, e.g., Goldstein (1998) or Haggard (2000). Also, Nanto and Jones (1997) provide an excellent summary and analysis of the early stages of the crisis as it affected Korea in 1997. Warr (2000) gives an analysis of the macroeconomic aspects of the crisis, and Smith (2000) offers an account of how macroeconomic and structural factors interacted as the crisis developed.
    [Show full text]
  • HYUNDAI CORPORATION Separate Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012 HYUNDAI CORPORATION Index December 31, 2013 and 2012
    HYUNDAI CORPORATION Separate Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012 HYUNDAI CORPORATION Index December 31, 2013 and 2012 Page(s) Report of Independent Auditors ............................................................................................. 1 - 2 Separate Financial Statements Separate Statements of Financial Position ............................................................................ 3 Separate Statements of Income ............................................................................................. 4 Separate Statements of Comprehensive Income ……………………………………………… 5 Separate Statements of Changes in Equity ……………………………….…………………… 6 Separate Statements of Cash Flows ...................................................................................... 7 Notes to Separate Financial Statements ................................................................................ 8 – 51 Report of Independent Accountant’s Review of Internal Accounting Control System … 52 Report of Independent Auditors To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of HYUNDAI CORPORATION We have audited the accompanying separate statements of financial position of HYUNDAI CORPORATION (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related separate statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended, expressed in Korean won. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Hysco Co. Ltd. • Hyundai Steel
    COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (Combination Registration No. C-2015/05/272) Fair Competition For Greater Good 05.06.2015 Notice u/s 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘Act’) given by: Hyundai Hysco Co. Ltd. Hyundai Steel Company Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘Act’) 1. On 8th May 2015, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act given by Hyundai Hysco Co. Ltd. (“Hyundai Hysco”) and Hyundai Steel Company (“Hyundai Steel”), pursuant to a merger agreement (‘Agreement’) entered into between them on 8th April 2015. Both Hyundai Hysco and Hyundai Steel are together referred to as “Parties”. 2. The Proposed combination relates to the merger of Hyundai Hysco into Hyundai Steel as a result of which Hyundai Hysco would cease to exist and Hyundai Steel will be the surviving company. It has been stated by the parties that both Hyundai Hysco and Hyundai Steel belong to the Hyundai Motor Group, South Korea. 3. The Proposed Combination falls under Section 5 (c) of the Act. 4. Hyundai Hysco, a company incorporated and listed in South Korea, is inter-alia engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of flat steel products, steel pipes, lightweight automotive parts and fuel cell systems. It is stated to be present in India through its two subsidiaries, i.e. Hysco Steel India Private Limited (“HSIPL”) and Automotive Steel Pipe India Private Limited (“ASPI”) 5. HSIPL, a company incorporated in India, is engaged in the business of supply/distribution of processed steel sheets to automobile original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), or their vendors.
    [Show full text]