PROBING BEYOND the STANDARD MODEL PHYSICS USING EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY a Dissertation Aimed at the Achievement of Ph.D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PROBING BEYOND the STANDARD MODEL PHYSICS USING EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY a Dissertation Aimed at the Achievement of Ph.D ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en PROBING BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL PHYSICS USING EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY A dissertation aimed at the achievement of Ph.D. in physics Author THIBAUD VANTALON Supervisor Tutor Prof. Christophe Grojean Dr. Oriol Pujolás Boix Institut de Física d’Altes Energies Grup de Física Teòrica Departament de Física – Facultat de Ciències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2018 Probing beyond the Standard Model physics using effective field theory A dissertation aimed at the achievement of Ph.D. in physics Author: Thibaud Vantalon Supervisor: Tutor: Prof. Christophe Grojean Dr. Oriol Pujolás Boix Institut de Física d’Altes Energies Grup de Física Teòrica Departament de Física – Facultat de Ciències Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona February 26, 2018 To the tuning which brought me here. Research is a wasteful process — Gian Francesco Giudice ABSTRACT Now the LHC has provided 120 fb−1 of data, the evidence for an energy gap between the Standard Model (SM) and new physics has grown strong. This makes effective field the- ory (EFT) a versatile method to constrain new physics with minimal model dependence. In this thesis, based on work done during my PhD candidature [1–4], we make use of EFT techniques in a variety of studies. We start by exploring the prospect of extracting the Higgs trilinear self-coupling at current hadron and future lepton colliders, using both higher order corrections to the single-Higgs process and di-Higgs production. Our anal- ysis minimizes model dependence thanks to the use of EFT. We argue that in order to constrain the different possible deviations to the Standard Model, a global fit with the inclusion of as many observables as possible is needed. We found that the inclusion of the trilinear correction in single-Higgs processes has a marginal effect at the LHC and will give a bound on the trilinear of order one. The situation is different at lepton col- liders, where the high precision and different running energies can give bound of order 50%. We then extend our EFT by adding a scalar singlet to study the CP properties of the particle which could have been behind the infamous 750 GeV di-photon excess. We define the CP sensitive asymmetries, in both the vector and gluon fusion channels, and study their power to differentiate between the CP odd or even hypotheses. Finally, we move somewhat away from EFT, and use a simplified model to compare the constraints on composite Higgs models coming from low energy neutron and electron electric dipole moment (EDM) measurements and LHC searches. Effective field theory is not completely absent, since we compute the two loop corrections of the light quarks and leptons EDM to match our simplified model to the higher dimensional operators of a low energy effective Lagrangian, and obtain bounds for our model. We then recast LHC searches and compare the present and future bounds. We found that the current bounds are competitive with the one coming from the LHC direct search and are of order a few TeV. The future upgrade of the experiment measuring the electron dipole moment should bring the bounds to the 5-10 TeV range. LISTOFWORKS Papers realized during the PhD and presented in this thesis: 1.Probing light top partners with CP violation Giuliano Panico, Marc Riembau , Thibaud Vantalon Submitted to JHEP for publication, arXiv:1712.06337 [hep-ph] 2.A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders Stefano Di Vita, Gauthier Durieux, Christophe Grojean, Jiayin Gu, Zhen Liu, Giu- liano Panico, Marc Riembau, Thibaud Vantalon JHEP to be published, arXiv:1711.03978 [hep-ph] 3.A global view on the Higgs self-coupling Stefano Di Vita, Christophe Grojean, Giuliano Panico, Marc Riembau, Thibaud Van- talon. JHEP09(2017)069, arXiv:1704.01953 [hep-ph] 4.Deciphering the CP nature of the 750 GeV resonance Mikael Chala, Christophe Grojean, Marc Riembau, Thibaud Vantalon Phys. lett. B. 2016.06.050, arXiv:1604.02029 [hep-ph] Paper realized before the PhD: 5.Composite Charge 8/3 Resonances at the LHC Oleksii Matsedonskyi, Francesco Riva, Thibaud Vantalon JHEP1404(2014)059, arXiv:1401.3740 [hep-ph] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am monstrously grateful to all the people without whom I would not be here today. In a somehow chronological order, Je veux commencer par remercier toute ma famille et particulièrement, ma mère Mar- tine, mon père, Jacky et ma grande petite sœur Sarah qui ont toujours été là pour moi. Un énorme merci à tous mes amis d’enfance en commençant par Louis à qui je dois la plupart de mon savoir informatique. Mes amis Corentin, Jérôme, Cyril, Antony, Arnaud sur qui je pourrai toujours compter. L’ordre chronologique nous amène finalement où les choses sérieuses ont commencé. Je voudrai remercier les “3 Mousquetaires”, Sam, Emmanuel et Victor sans qui tout aurai été “vachement” moins drôle ! Which bring us to Riccardo Rattazzi and Francesco Riva, who introduced me to quan- tum field theory and helped me to get my PhD student position. Which at last bring me to Christophe Grojean who accepted me as his student and taught me and helped me during those four years. A big thank to José Ramón Espinosa Sedano for the physics discussion. Without him, Clara and the two Marc my Catalan and Spanish level would never have allowed me to survived the Spanish administration. I am also very grateful to my IFAE and DESY colleagues and friends, (Marc)i1, Clara, Mateo, Mat2eo (no higher order presently known), Sergi, Joan, Lindber, Xabier, Bernat, Daniel, Oriol, Sebastian, Oleksii, Marco, Felix, Filippo, Iason, Jiayin, Nayara, Yann, Thomas, Valerie, Yannick, Riccardo, Benedict, Ibrahim. A special mention is worth for my collabo- rators Giuliano, Marc, Stefano, Jiayin, Zhen, Gauthier, Mikael, Emanuele and Christophe. A special thanks to the bouldering crew especially Rob Klabbers for the extra challenge! And my flatmate for the Catan game and the fun time: Moli, Alex, Javier, Anna, Christoph, Frederike, Jakab. A huge thanks to Jérome for the title page and Iason, Gauthier, Benedict and Nayara for their valuable comments and try to minimize the number of spelling mistakes. I am also grateful to the creators of the classicthesis LATEX template which I used to write this document. 1 With i the generation index running from 1 to 2 CONTENTS Abstract vii List of works ix Acknowledgement xi Preface 1 Disclaimer 3 i the framework 1 the standard model 7 1.1 Fields and symmetries 7 1.2 The Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism 9 1.2.1 Gauge boson masses 9 1.2.2 Fermion masses and implications 12 1.3 The θ¯ parameters 13 1.4 The Standard Model in numbers 14 1.5 New physics opportunities 16 2 effective field theory 19 2.1 The SM as an EFT 19 2.2 The standard model EFT 19 ii constraining the standard model eft 3 which higgs? 29 3.1 Current constraints 29 3.2 Parameterizing new physics in the Higgs sector 32 3.2.1 Higgs primary couplings 32 3.2.2 Additional operators contributing to Higgs observables 35 3.2.3 Large Higgs self-interactions in a consistent EFT expansion 37 4 testing the higgs trilinear at a hadron collider 41 4.1 Fit from inclusive single-Higgs measurements 41 4.1.1 Single-Higgs rates and single-Higgs couplings 42 4.1.2 Global fit including Higgs self-coupling 47 4.1.3 Impact of the trilinear coupling on single-Higgs couplings 49 4.2 Double-Higgs production 50 4.3 Differential observables 53 4.3.1 Impact of single-Higgs differential measurements 53 4.3.2 Robustness of the fits 55 4.4 The trilinear at HL-LHC 57 5 testing the higgs trilinear at lepton colliders 61 5.1 Future machines 61 5.2 Low-energy lepton machines 62 5.2.1 Higher-order corrections to single-Higgs processes 63 5.2.2 Global analysis 65 5.3 High-energy lepton machines 71 5.3.1 Higgs pair production 71 xiv contents 5.3.2 Global analysis 75 5.4 The trilinear at lepton colliders 78 6 present and future of the trilinear 81 iii testing new physics using eft 7 parity of a scalar particle decaying into photons 85 7.1 Context 85 7.2 Parameterization and constraints 86 7.3 Different channels 88 7.3.1 Associated production 88 7.3.2 Gluon fusion 91 7.3.3 Vector-boson fusion 94 7.4 Results 97 7.5 Conclusions 98 8 probing light top partners with cp violation 101 8.1 Introduction 101 8.2 Effects of composite Higgs models 101 8.3 CP violation from top partners 104 8.3.1 Electron EDM 106 8.3.2 CP-violating effects for the light quarks 111 8.3.3 Experimental bounds 115 8.3.4 Comparison with direct top partner searches 118 8.4 Non-minimal models 120 8.4.1 The 14 + 1 model with a light singlet 121 8.4.2 The 5 + 5 2-site model 123 8.5 Conclusions 127 9 closing words 129 iv appendix a the trilinear at hadron colliders 133 a.1 Parametrizing EFT cross sections using MadGraph 133 a.2 Higgs production and decay rates in the EFT framework 134 b the trilinear at lepton colliders 141 b.1 One-loop corrections from δκλ 141 b.2 Additional results 141 c statistical refinement on asymmetry 147 d top partners production cross section 149 Glossary 151 bibliography 155 PREFACE July 4, 2012, early morning, after an overnight wait for some, people are impatiently in line, not for the new trendy gadget or to watch the premier of the new blockbuster movie, this queue is not in front of a shop, or a cinema but in front of an auditorium at conseil européen pour la recherche nucléaire (CERN).
Recommended publications
  • Two Notions of Naturalness
    For almost 40 years, the requirement that models of BSM physics be natural has heavily inuenced model-building in high-energy physics. Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 1 / 60 The expectation of a natural solution to the hierarchy problem was probably the most popular argument for expecting new particles at the LHC. Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 2 / 60 The Standard Model reigns supreme. As of today, the LHC has discovered no evidence for SUSY or any other mechanism for naturally stabilizing the weak scale. Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 4 / 60 As of today, the LHC has discovered no evidence for SUSY or any other mechanism for naturally stabilizing the weak scale. The Standard Model reigns supreme. Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 4 / 60 This has left many people in the HEP community unsure about how to proceed. Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 5 / 60 Now What? Aspen 2013 - Higgs Quo Vadis Nathan Seiberg IAS TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAA AA If neither supersymmetry nor any other sort of natural solution...appears in the data...[t]his would...give theorists a strong incentive to take the ideas of the multiverse more seriously. – Nima Arkani-Hamed (2012) Porter Williams (University of Pittsburgh) Two notions of naturalness February 28, 2018 8 / 60 If the electroweak symmetry breaking scale is anthropically xed, then we can give up the decades long search for a natural solution to the hierarchy problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Cern Quick Facts 2017
    BUDGET Total Member States’ and additional contributions 1141.7 million CHF COUNCIL CERN QUICK FACTS 2017 Normalized contributions from the Member States (%) Austria 2.17 Belgium 2.76 Bulgaria 0.29 Czech Republic 0.94 Denmark 1.77 Finland 1.35 MANAGEMENT France 14.32 Directorate Germany 20.44 Greece 1.20 Director-General Fabiola Gianotti Hungary 0.60 Director for Accelerators and Technology Frédérick Bordry Israel 1.49 Director for Finance and Human Resources Martin Steinacher Italy 10.62 Director for International Relations Charlotte Warakaulle Netherlands 4.77 Director for Research and Computing Eckhard Elsen Norway 2.90 Poland 2.82 Council Support John Pym Portugal 1.11 Internal Audit John Steel Romania 0.99 Legal Service Eva-Maria Gröniger-Voss Slovakia 0.48 Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Simon Baird Spain 7.22 Ombuds Sudeshna Datta Cockerill Sweden 2.73 Switzerland 3.92 Scientific Information Services Jens Vigen United Kingdom 15.10 Education, Communications and Outreach Ana Godinho Associate Member States in the pre-stage Host States Relations Friedemann Eder to Membership Media and Press Relations Arnaud Marsollier Cyprus 0.01 Member State Relations Pippa Wells Serbia 0.17 Non-Member State Relations Emmanuel Tsesmelis Slovenia 0.03 Protocol Service Wendy Korda Relations with International Organizations Olivier Martin Associate Member States India 1.03 Departments Pakistan 0.13 Beams (BE) Paul Collier Turkey 0.43 Engineering (EN) Roberto Losito Ukraine 0.09 Experimental Physics (EP) Manfred Krammer Finance
    [Show full text]
  • Higgs Collider Phenomenology: Important Backgrounds, Naturalness Probes and the Electroweak Phase Transition
    Higgs collider phenomenology: important backgrounds, naturalness probes and the electroweak phase transition. A Dissertation presented by Harikrishnan Ramani to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics and Astronomy Stony Brook University August 2017 (include this copyright page only if you are selecting copyright through ProQuest, which is optional) Copyright by Harikrishnan Ramani 2017 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Harikrishnan Ramani We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation Patrick Meade - Dissertation Advisor Associate Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy George Sterman - Chairperson of Defense Distinguished Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy Dmitri Tsybychev - Committee Member Associate Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy Eder Izaguirre - Outside Member Assistant Physicist, Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Higgs collider phenomenology: important backgrounds, naturalness probes and the electroweak phase transition. by Harikrishnan Ramani Doctor of Philosophy in Physics and Astronomy Stony Brook University 2017 The Higgs boson discovered in 2012, might be the portal to new physics. With the Higgs as the common theme we present the following research arcs. In order to study the Higgs, it is important to have a very good handle on Standard model(SM) backgrounds. One such background process is SM WW production, which reported routine 3 sigma excesses in early run 1 of the LHC. However, experiments use Parton Showers for theoreti- cal prediction and this might be inadequate for exclusive cross-sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Temperature of the Radiation Era and Its Cosmological
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.ukLargest temperature of the radiation era brought to you by CORE and its cosmological implications provided by CERN Document Server Gian Francesco Giudice∗ CERN Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Edward W. Kolb NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510-0500, and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1433 Antonio Riotto Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy, and INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy (May 2000) The thermal history of the universe before the epoch of nucleosynthesis is unknown. The maxi- mum temperature in the radiation-dominated era, which we will refer to as the reheat temperature, may have been as low as 0.7 MeV. In this paper we show that a low reheat temperature has impor- tant implications for many topics in cosmology. We show that weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) may be produced even if the reheat temperature is much smaller than the freeze-out temperature of the WIMP, and that the dependence of the present abundance on the mass and the annihilation cross section of the WIMP differs drastically from familiar results. We revisit predic- tions of the relic abundance and resulting model constraints of supersymmetric dark matter, axions, massive neutrinos, and other dark matter candidates, nucleosynthesis constraints on decaying parti- cles, and leptogenesis by decay of superheavy
    [Show full text]
  • On Future High-Energy Colliders
    On Future High-Energy Colliders Gian Francesco Giudice CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract An outline of the physics reasons to pursue a future programme in high-energy colliders is presented. While the LHC physics programme is still in full swing, the preparations for the European Strategy for Particle Physics and the recent release of the FCC Conceptual Design Report bring attention to the future of high-energy physics. How do results from the LHC impact the future of particle physics? Why are new high-energy colliders needed? Where do we stand after the LHC discovery of the Higgs boson? Undoubtedly, the highlight of the LHC programme so far has been the discovery of the Higgs boson, which was announced at CERN on 4 July 2012. The result has had a profound impact on particle physics, establishing new fundamental questions and opening a new experimental programme aimed at exploring the nature of the newly found particle. The revolutionary aspect of this discovery can be understood by comparing it with the previous discovery of a new elementary particle { the one of the top quark, which took place at Fermilab in 1995. The situation at the time was completely different. The properties of the top quark were exactly what was needed to complete satisfactorily the existing theoretical framework and the new particle fell into its place like the missing piece of a jigsaw puzzle. Instead, the discovery of the Higgs boson leaves us wondering about many questions still left unanswered. The top quark was the culmination of a discovery process; the Higgs boson appears to be the starting point of an exploration process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dawn of the Post-Naturalness Era Arxiv:1710.07663V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph]
    CERN-TH-2017-205 The Dawn of the Post-Naturalness Era Gian Francesco Giudice CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract In an imaginary conversation with Guido Altarelli, I express my views on the status of particle physics beyond the Standard Model and its future prospects. Contribution to the volume \From My Vast Repertoire" { The Legacy of Guido Altarelli. 1 A Master and a Friend Honour a king in his own land; honour a wise man everywhere. | Tibetan proverb [1] Guido Altarelli was an extraordinary theoretical physicist. Not only was Guido one of the heroes of the Standard Model, but he incarnated the very essence of that theory: a perfect synthesis of pure elegance and brilliance. With his unique charisma, he had a great influence on CERN and contributed much in promoting the role of theoretical physics in the life of the laboratory. With the right mixture of vision, authority, and practical common sense, he led the Theory Division from 2000 to 2004. I have always admired Guido for his brilliance, humour, knowledge, leadership, and intellectual integrity. I learned much from his qualities and his example is a precious legacy for me and for all of his colleagues. Guido had a very pragmatic attitude towards scientific theories. He was not attracted arXiv:1710.07663v1 [physics.hist-ph] 18 Oct 2017 by elaborate mathematical constructions, but wanted to understand the essence behind the formalism and get straight to the concept. In physics, I would define him as a conservative revolutionary or as an optimistic skeptical. One episode illustrates the meaning of this definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0801.2562V2 [Hep-Ph]
    NATURALLY SPEAKING: The Naturalness Criterion and Physics at the LHC Gian Francesco GIUDICE CERN, Theoretical Physics Division Geneva, Switzerland 1 Naturalness in Scientific Thought Everything is natural: if it weren’t, it wouldn’t be. Mary Catherine Bateson [1] Almost every branch of science has its own version of the “naturalness criterion”. In environmental sciences, it refers to the degree to which an area is pristine, free from human influence, and characterized by native species [2]. In mathematics, its meaning is associated with the intuitiveness of certain fundamental concepts, viewed as an intrinsic part of our thinking [3]. One can find the use of naturalness criterions in computer science (as a measure of adaptability), in agriculture (as an acceptable level of product manipulation), in linguistics (as translation quality assessment of sentences that do not reflect the natural and idiomatic forms of the receptor language). But certainly nowhere else but in particle physics has the mutable concept of naturalness taken a form which has become so influential in the development of the field. The role of naturalness in the sense of “æsthetic beauty” is a powerful guiding principle for physicists as they try to construct new theories. This may appear surprising since the final product is often a mathematically sophisticated theory based on deep fundamental principles, arXiv:0801.2562v2 [hep-ph] 30 Mar 2008 and one could believe that subjective æsthetic arguments have no place in it. Nevertheless, this is not true and often theoretical physicists formulate their theories inspired by criteria of simplicity and beauty, i.e. by what Nelson [4] defines as “structural naturalness”.
    [Show full text]
  • Lopsided Gauge Mediation JHEP05(2011)112 7 8 (1.1) Originate Is a Gauge Μ G B
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: May 4, 2011 Accepted: May 7, 2011 Published: May 25, 2011 Lopsided gauge mediation JHEP05(2011)112 Andrea De Simone,a Roberto Franceschini,a Gian Francesco Giudice,b Duccio Pappadopuloa and Riccardo Rattazzia aInstitut de Th´eoriedes Ph´enom`enesPhysiques, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland bCERN, Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: It has been recently pointed out that the unavoidable tuning among supersym- metric parameters required to raise the Higgs boson mass beyond its experimental limit opens up new avenues for dealing with the so called µ-Bµ problem of gauge mediation. In fact, it allows for accommodating, with no further parameter tuning, large values of Bµ and of the other Higgs-sector soft masses, as predicted in models where both µ and Bµ are generated at one-loop order. This class of models, called Lopsided Gauge Mediation, offers an interesting alternative to conventional gauge mediation and is characterized by a strikingly different phenomenology, with light higgsinos, very large Higgs pseudoscalar mass, and moderately light sleptons. We discuss general parametric relations involving the fine-tuning of the model and various observables such as the chargino mass and the value of tan β. We build an explicit model and we study the constraints coming from LEP and Tevatron. We show that in spite of new interactions between the Higgs and the messenger superfields, the theory can remain perturbative up to very large scales, thus retaining gauge coupling unification.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalness, Wilsonian Renormalization, and “Fundamental Parameters” in Quantum Field Theory
    TTK-19-04, ELHC 2018-005 January 2019 Naturalness, Wilsonian Renormalization, and \Fundamental Parameters" in Quantum Field Theory Joshua Rosaler and Robert Harlander Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany Abstract The Higgs naturalness principle served as the basis for the so far failed prediction that signatures of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) would be discovered at the LHC. One influential formulation of the princi- ple, which prohibits fine tuning of bare Standard Model (SM) parameters, rests on the assumption that a particular set of values for these parame- ters constitute the \fundamental parameters" of the theory, and serve to mathematically define the theory. On the other hand, an old argument by Wetterich suggests that fine tuning of bare parameters merely reflects an arbitrary, inconvenient choice of expansion parameters and that the choice of parameters in an EFT is therefore arbitrary. We argue that these two interpretations of Higgs fine tuning reflect distinct ways of formulat- ing and interpreting effective field theories (EFTs) within the Wilsonian framework: the first takes an EFT to be defined by a single set of physical, fundamental bare parameters, while the second takes a Wilsonian EFT to be defined instead by a whole Wilsonian renormalization group (RG) trajectory, associated with a one-parameter class of physically equivalent parametrizations. From this latter perspective, no single parametrization constitutes the physically correct, fundamental parametrization of the the- ory, and the delicate cancellation between bare Higgs mass and quantum corrections appears as an eliminable artifact of the arbitrary, unphysical reference scale with respect to which the physical amplitudes of the the- ory are parametrized.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Unification at the Electroweak Scale
    Large Extra Dimensions & Grand Unification at the Electroweak Scale Behrad Taghavi Department of Physics & Astronomy, Stony Brook University. ! Advisor: Dr. Patric Meade OUTLINE • Motivations • Kaluza-Klein Theory • Localization on Topological Defects • Large Extra Dimensions Paradigm • ADD Model • Hierarchy Problem • Proton Stability • Other Models (eg. UED) • References 2 MOTIVATIONS We need beyond standard model theories to answer questions like hierarchy problem, unification of all fundamental forces, etc. Most of beyond standard model theories (like String Theory, M Theory, GUTs, MSSM, etc.) predict unification of forces at the energy scale close to planck mass. Large Extra Dimensions paradigm is capable of answering most of unanswered questions in SM elegantly and also keeps high energy physics as a experiment-based field of physics. 3 KALUZA-KLEIN THEORY Kaluza–Klein theory (KK theory) is a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism built around the idea of a fifth dimension beyond the usual 4 of space and time. “Kaluza-Klein” mechanism has been first introduced in the 1921 paper of “Theodor Kaluza” , which extended classical GR to 4+1 dimensions that resulted in unification of Electromagnetism and Einstein’s Gravity. In 1926, “Oskar Klein” gave Kaluza's classical 5-dimensional theory a quantum interpretation by introduction of “curled up” or “compact” dimensions. 4 KALUZA-KLEIN THEORY Assume that the world is (4+ n )-dimensional (n 1 ), but the extra ≥ dimensions are compact. If n =1 , our world is a M 4 S 1 manifold. ! ⌦ All fields are defined on this “M 4 S 1 cylinder”. ⌦ ! For a scalar field Φ ( x µ ,Z ) single-valuedness condition reads: Φ(xµ,Z)=Φ(xµ,Z+2⇡R),µ=0, 1, 2, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE MACHINES in PROJECT for CONFRONTING the FUTURE of PARTICLE PHYSICS Thursday, 23 May 2019 18:30 (2 Hours)
    5th Summer School on INtelligent signal processing for FrontIEr Research and Industry Contribution ID: 8 Type: not specified THE FUTURE MACHINES IN PROJECT FOR CONFRONTING THE FUTURE OF PARTICLE PHYSICS Thursday, 23 May 2019 18:30 (2 hours) ‼ THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT TOPIC IN THE HIGH ENERGY WORLD ‼ WHAT ARE THE NEXT MACHINES TO BE BUILT FOR EXPLORING and EXPLAIN THE ELEMENTARY PARTICLE WORLD MUCH BEYOND WHAT HAS BEEN ALREADY DISCOVERED⁇ These are WORLDWIDE & INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS for the next 50 or more years tocome. The accelerators of particles in project in the world, China, Europe and Japan will be presented, withtheir Physics reach as well as their Physics and Technological Challenges, by international experts. These projects include: • The electron-positron linear colliders; two such colliders in project: 1) the ILC (International Linear Collider) at 250 GeV in c.m.s. in Japan (see abstract by Prof. Hitoshi Hayano). Five Technical Design Reports describe in details the whole project. 2) CLIC ( Compact Linear Collider) at CERN (CH) first at 380 GeV, then 1.5 TeV and up to 3TeV. Four Conceptual Design Reports (CDR) describe the Machine, Detectors and Physics of this project. • Two combined e+e- and pp colliders in project: 1) the CepC/SppC project in China aiming to build a 100 kms long circular machine. This machine will be in a first stage an electron-positron collider, running at 90, 160 and 250 GeV (Z, W factory, Higgs Factory, Flavor factory).The CepC is expected to run towards end of 2030. In a second stage of this project, the circular tunnel is used as a proton-proton collider running at about 100 TeV center of mass energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cern Quick Facts 2020
    BUDGET (at 31.12.2019) Total of contributions 1 196.89 MCHF Member States’ contributions 1 168.92 MCHF Associated Member States’ contributions CERN QUICK FACTS 2020 27.97 MCHF Contributions from the Member States (%) Austria 2.16 Belgium 2.68 Bulgaria 0.31 Czech Republic 0.99 Denmark 1.76 Finland 1.32 MANAGEMENT France 13.94 Germany 20.80 Directorate Greece 1.05 Director-General Fabiola Gianotti Hungary 0.64 Director for Accelerators and Technology Frédérick Bordry Israel 1.86 Director for Finance and Human Resources Martin Steinacher Italy 10.29 Director for International Relations Charlotte Warakaulle Netherlands 4.55 Director for Research and Computing Eckhard Elsen Norway 2.31 Poland 2.78 Council Support John Pym Portugal 1.09 Internal Audit John Steel Romania 1.09 Legal Service Eva-Maria Gröniger-Voss Serbia 0.23 Occupational Health & Safety and Environmental Protection Doris Forkel-Wirth Slovakia 0.49 Ombud Pierre Gildemyn Spain 7.09 Sweden 2.61 Scientific Information Services Alexander Kohls Switzerland 4.14 United Kingdom 15.82 Education, Communications and Outreach Ana Godinho Host States Relations Friedemann Eder Total Member States: 100% Media and Press Relations Anaïs Rassat Member State Relations Pippa Wells Additional contributions (% of total) Non-Member State Relations Emmanuel Tsesmelis Protocol Office Stéphanie Molinari Associate Member States in the Pre-stage Relations with International Organisations Olivier Martin to Membership (Total: 0.17%) Cyprus 0.08 Departments Slovenia 0.09 Beams (BE) Paul Collier Engineering
    [Show full text]