DOCSLIB.ORG

Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice for Iran- 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice for Iran- 2012 Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice For Iran- 2012 1 Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice For Iran- 2012 Justice for Iran (JFI) is a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization established in July 2010. JFI uses methods such as documentation of human rights violations, collecting information, and research about authority figures who played a role in severe and widespread violation of human rights in Iran, as well as use of judicial, political and international mechanisms in place, to execute justice, remove impunity and bring about accountability to the actors and agents of human rights violations inside of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Pursuing its mission and as follow up to the report “Crime Without Punishment,” JFI is in the process of documenting the instances of sexual violence and rape suffered by female political prisoners in Iran since the establishment of Islamic Republic of Iran. The first installment of this report focused on the rapes that took place inside Iranian prisons during the 1980’s and was published in November 2011. The other two parts of this research, concerning the 1990’s and the 2000’s, will be published soon. The series of reports attempt to view torture and imprisonment in different decades in Iran through the eyes of sexuality and is set to explore the topic of violence, harassment and torture of the female political prisoners. By doing so, while legitimizing the pain and suffering endured by the victims of such heinous crimes, the actors and agents of those crimes will be introduced to the public and the society while measures will be taken, through producing valid documents, to hold such individuals accountable and if possible punish them. Furthermore, JFI is in the process of completing a data bank of information and personal data of the violators of human rights in Iran. This data bank is being compiled not only to be used in bringing forth legal cases, but also to increase the general public’s knowledge regarding the human rights violators in an effort to start the process of accountability. 2 Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice For Iran- 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Some Victims of Human Rights Violation in the Gerdab Project ............................................ 6 2.1. Saeed Malekpour ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Vahid Asghari.................................................................................................................. 13 2.3. Ahmad-Reza Hashempour ............................................................................................. 19 3. Organizations and Officials Responsible for the Violation of Human Rights in Gerdab Project ........................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1. Center to Investigate Organized Crime - Cyber Crime Desk .......................................... 22 Cases of Violation of Human Rights ...................................................................................... 23 a. Gerdab (Muzillin Project) ............................................................................................ 23 b. Suppression of Protestors after the Election (Deep Sedition Project) ....................... 26 c. Iran Proxy (Woodpecker Project) ............................................................................... 27 d. Suppression of Human Rights Activists Society (Mersad Project) ............................... 28 e. Filtering of Internet Websites ..................................................................................... 30 3.2. Mohammad Sadeghi ...................................................................................................... 31 3.3. Reza Ja’fari ...................................................................................................................... 33 4. Legal Analysis of the Human Rights Violations Occurring in the Process of Gerdab Project ........................................................................................................................................... 37 4.1. Presumption of Innocence ............................................................................................. 37 4.2. Illegality of Arbitrary Arrest ............................................................................................ 38 4.3. Principle of Ban of Torture ............................................................................................. 40 4.4. Right to a Fair Trial ......................................................................................................... 41 Right to Retain an Attorney .................................................................................................. 41 Right to Obtain the Opinion of an Independent Expert ....................................................... 42 Right to Appeal...................................................................................................................... 43 4.5. Right to Redress ............................................................................................................. 44 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Translated Text of the Letter of Said Malekpour ...................................................................... 47 Translated Text of the Letter of Vahid Asghari ......................................................................... 50 Copy of the First Page of the Letter of Complaint of Vahid Asghari ......................................... 57 3 Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice For Iran- 2012 1. Introduction In 2007, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), established an organization titled Center to Investigate Organized Crime (Cyber Crime Office). This center which is a division of the IRGC focuses on ensuring the security of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the cyber space. After its establishment, the first case file the center worked on was a project titled “Muzillin”1 (also known as Gerdab—Whirlpool) in the process of which 90 Persian websites that had pornographic content were shut down. A number of individuals were arrested under the title of Persian porn producers and subsequently transferred to Ward 2A of Evin Prison which is under the control of the IRGC. The Center to Investigate Organized Crime published the names and photographs of 45 of the individuals arrested and called them “Muzillin.” At the same time, the Iranian national television broadcast the confessions of some of the accused in a few episodes. In the televised confessions, the accused admitted that they intended to attack the cultural basis of the Islamic Rrepublic through corrupting and driving the youth from the right path as well as having political agendas against the government or Islam and received money from the American government to establish and produce content for the pornographic websites. A year and half later, a number of the detainees and relatives of the detainees broke their silence about the treatments endured that led to the said confessions. They filed complaint to official judicial authorities regarding long stretches of time spent in solitary cells, continuous and severe physical and psychological torture to obtain and record false confessions, lack of respect of the authority for the right of due process from the moment of arrest throughout the entire duration of preliminary investigation phase, depriving from the basic rights of visitation with the family or retaining an attorney or being provided with medical treatment, and other such calamities endured by the detainees. Although serious doubts existed regarding the legality of the detentions and preliminary research, as well as the extraction of confessions, the Special Prosecution Office to Investigate Computerized Crimes, the judicial arm of Gerdab Project issued indictments for majority of the detainees in late summer of 2009, requesting execution as punishment for some of them. This office is the same authority who had ordered the arrest of the accused, issued their temporary detention warrants, and was instrumental in the explanation of crimes and carrying out the preliminary research. Different branches of the Revolutionary Court, where the case file of those accused in the Muzillin Project were sent, issued sentences ranging from multiple years of imprisonment to execution. It has been reported that at least 7 individuals accused in this project have been sentenced to execution but we could only verify the issuance of execution order for five individuals. 1 Muzillin is an Arabic word meaning being lost or wayward. The Center to Investigate Organized Crime of the IRGC used this term to describe a project in which individuals have been arrested for collaborating, launching and producing pornographic content. 4 Gerdab; a Dictated Scenario Justice For Iran- 2012 At the time of finalizing this report, three of those five execution orders issued for the accused in Muzillin Project were upheld by the Supreme Court. The three individuals who are at imminent danger for execution are Ahmad Reza Hashempour,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom of Assembly and Association
    JANUARY 2012 COUNTRY SUMMARY Iran In 2011 Iranian authorities refused to allow government critics to engage in peaceful demonstrations. In February, March, April, and September security forces broke up large- scale protests in several major cities. In mid-April security forces reportedly shot and killed dozens of protesters in Iran’s Arab-majority Khuzestan province. There was a sharp increase in the use of the death penalty. The government continued targeting civil society activists, especially lawyers, rights activists, students, and journalists. In July 2011 the government announced it would not cooperate with, or allow access to, the United Nations special rapporteur on Iran, appointed in March 2011 in response to the worsening rights situation. Freedom of Assembly and Association In February and March thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of Tehran, the capital, and several other major cities to support pro-democracy protests in neighboring Arab countries and protest the detention of Iranian opposition leaders. The authorities’ violent response led to at least three deaths and hundreds of arrests. In response to calls by former presidential candidates and opposition leaders Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi for mass protests in February, security forces arbitrarily arrested dozens of political opposition members in Tehran and several other cities beginning on February 8. Several days later they placed both Mousavi and Karroubi under house arrest, where they remained at this writing. In April Iran’s parliament passed several articles of a draft bill which severely limits the independence of civil society organizations, and creates a Supreme Committee Supervising NGO Activities chaired by ministry officials and members of the security forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint NGO Statement to GA on Need for New Iran Mechanism FINAL with LOGOS
    Joint written statement to the 16th session of the UN Human Rights Council (28 February – 25 March 2011) submitted by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Reporters sans frontières Iran: The international community must act to save hundreds at risk of execution February 2011 AI Index: MDE 13/018/2011 The international community and the UN Human Rights Council need to act to stop a wave of executions currently underway in Iran from escalating further. At least 86 individuals have been executed since the start of 2011, according to reports from official sources or state-run media. The true number of executions may be even higher, as there are credible reports that executions are taking place in some prisons which are not announced officially. The Iranian Judiciary and other relevant bodies should immediately order and implement a moratorium on all death penalty cases. At least ten of those executed in January 2011 had been convicted of “enmity against God” ( moharebeh ) for a variety of alleged offences including armed robbery, or for political activities such as participating in demonstrations, or for their alleged links to opposition groups. Sixty-seven others had been convicted of drug trafficking. The increase in such executions follows the passing of an amended anti-narcotics law, drafted by the Expediency Council and approved by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which came into force in late December 2010. Officials have also February 2011 Iran: The international community must act to save hundreds at risk of execution 2 vowed to step up enforcement measures against drug trafficking. In October 2010, the Prosecutor General announced that all those sentenced to death for drug trafficking would have their cases reviewed by his office.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 11, 2008
    Iran Page 1 of 25 Iran Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 11, 2008 The Islamic Republic of Iran*, with a population of approximately 70 million, is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shi'a Muslim clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty-–albeit restricted--and the rule of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not directly elected but chosen by a directly-elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei dominated the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controlled the armed forces and indirectly controlled the internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majles. An unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviewed all legislation passed by the Majles for adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles and also screened presidential and Majles candidates for eligibility. In 2005 hardline conservative Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad won the presidency in an election widely viewed by the international community as neither free nor fair. The civilian authorities did not maintain fully effective control of the security forces. The government's poor human rights record worsened, and it continued to commit numerous, serious abuses. The government severely limited citizens' right to change their government peacefully through free and fair elections. There were reports of unjust executions after unfair trials. Security forces committed acts of politically motivated abductions; torture and severe officially-sanctioned punishments, including death by stoning; amputation; flogging; and excessive use of force against and imprisonment of demonstrators.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Action
    UA: 125/11 Index: MDE 13/047/2011Iran Date: 06 May 2011 URGENT ACTION STUDENT ACTIVISTS HELD IN IRAN Two members of the Confederation of Iranian Students (CIS), an independent group of current and former students, have been arrested. Shiva Kamalipour Azad was arrested in Iran’s capital, Tehran, on 26 April 2011 and Mohammad Reza Fakhravar (known as Arash) was reportedly arrested at Tehran Airport on or around 29 April. They are at risk of torture or other ill treatment. Journalist Shiva Kamalipour Azad, aged 29, was initially arrested on 17 April 2011 by security officials at the Imam Khomeini International Airport in Tehran, as she was leaving to attend a conference about journalism in the Muslim world in the USA via Dubai. Her passport, camera, computer and phone were confiscated and she was taken to Evin Prison, Tehran, where she reportedly appeared before a Revolutionary Court. Shiva Kamalipour Azad was held in incommunicado detention, until her release on bail on 24 April 2011. She is believed to have been ill-treated during interrogation. She was arrested again at her grandfather’s residence, in the middle of the night two days later by six security officials believed to be from an intelligence body. She was blindfolded and taken back to Evin Prison where she is still held. Nineteen-year-old student activist Arash Fakhravar was reportedly arrested on arrival in Tehran after returning from France where he was an asylum-seeker. The circumstances of his departure from France are unclear. His current whereabouts are unknown, and he may have been subjected to enforced disappearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events in Iran, May 2004*
    Chronology of Events in Iran, May 2004* May 1 Three Iranian dissidents given week's leave from prison. (Islamic Republic News Agency / IRNA) Three members of a dissident Iranian group, who are held for acting against the Islamic Republic, have been granted temporary leave. Taqi Rahmani, Reza Alijani and Hoda Saber, members of the so-called religious-nationalist group, were granted a one-week leave from Evin prison by Tehran general and revolutionary court, the head of the court's public relations office, Mohammad Shadabi said. Rahmani faces 11 years in prison, while Saber has been given nine years and Alijani six years. They were among a group of 14 dissidents who received their punishment from the Revolutionary Court in May 2003 for attempting to topple the Islamic establishment. May 2 Iranian judiciary allows four dissidents to go on leave. (Agence France-Presse / AFP) Iranian judiciary authorities allowed seven prominent dissidents jailed for speaking out against the regime and students jailed during unrest in 1999 to go on leave. According to the paper, Akbar Ganji, who was jailed in 2000 after he alleged top regime officials were behind a spate of grisly serial murders of dissidents, was given seven days of leave. Ahmad Batebi, Nasser Zarafshan and Akbar Mohammadi were each given five days out of prison. Batebi had been initially condemned to death for his participation in the demonstration in 1999 where he was featured on a famous photograph holding aloft a blood-soaked T-shirt. His sentence was revised to 13 years imprisonment. In August 2002, Zarafshan, a prominent lawyer was sentenced to five years in prison and 50 lashes for "distributing secret information".
    [Show full text]
  • Iran March 2009
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN, FROM 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.03 Iran............................................................................................. 1.03 Tehran ....................................................................................... 1.04 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................ 2.01 Sanctions ...................................................................................... 2.13 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 Calendar ........................................................................................ 3.02 Pre 1979......................................................................................... 3.03 1979 to 1999 .................................................................................. 3.05 2000 to date................................................................................... 3.16 Student unrest .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ahmad Batebi (M) Aged 28, Former Student Activist
    PUBLIC AI Index: MDE 13/103/2006 20 September 2006 Further Information on UA 215/06 (MDE 13/089/2006, 09 August 2006) Fear for safety/Medical concern/Torture IRAN Ahmad Batebi (m) aged 28, former student activist Former student activist Ahmad Batebi is now known to be held in Evin prison in the capital, Tehran. His relatives have been permitted to visit him there three times. He called off his hunger strike shortly after his family's first visit to him in detention on 21 August. However, he is still said to be seriously mentally and physically ill. Prison authorities are reportedly denying him access to the medical treatment he needs. Ahmad Batebi was re-arrested on 27 July after failing to return from a period of temporary leave from prison, which began around March 2005. He is serving a 10-year sentence in connection with involvement in student demonstration in 1999. Following his re-arrest his family was not told where he was detained until 12 August, when he was permitted to telephone his wife, Somaie Baiienat, and confirm that he was held in Section 209 of Evin prison. His family have only been permitted to visit him three times. During their first two visits, Ahmad Batebi's family were accompanied by four prison guards, although their third visit, on 18 September, was reportedly less heavily supervised. Ahmad Batebi is not permitted to see his lawyer. Ahmad Batebi is reportedly in poor physical and mental health, which is said to be deteriorating. He suffers from a number of medical problems as a result of being tortured and ill-treated during his previous period of detention, including stomach and kidney problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Page 1 of 30
    2008 Human Rights Report: Iran Page 1 of 30 2008 Human Rights Report: Iran* BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices February 25, 2009 The Islamic Republic of Iran, with a population of approximately 70 million, is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty-–albeit restricted--and the rule of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not directly elected but chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei's writ dominated the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controlled the armed forces and indirectly controlled the internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majles. An unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviewed all legislation passed by the Majles for adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles and also screened presidential and Majles candidates for eligibility. In 2005 hardline conservative Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad won the presidency in an election widely viewed by the international community as neither free nor fair. Civilian authorities did not fully maintain effective control of security forces. The government's poor human rights record worsened, and it continued to commit numerous serious abuses. The government severely limited citizens' right to change their government peacefully through free and fair elections. The government executed numerous persons for criminal convictions as juveniles and after unfair trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2001
    Covering events from January - December 2000 IRAN Islamic Republic of Iran Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Ayatollah Sayed 'Ali Khamenei President: Hojjatoleslam val Moslemin Sayed Mohammad Khatami Capital: Tehran Population: 67.7 million Official language: Farsi (Persian) Death penalty: retentionist 2000 treaty ratifications/signatures: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Scores of political prisoners continued to be held; among them were prisoners of conscience and others sentenced in previous years after unfair trials. A clamp-down on freedom of expression resulted in the arbitrary arrest and imprisonment of scores of journalists. Reports of torture and ill- treatment continued. At least 75 people were executed during 2000; the true number may have been considerably higher. Background Parliamentary elections held in two stages in February and April formed the background to the struggle concerning freedom of expression and association. The elections were decisively won by supporters of President Mohammad Khatami. The new authorities set out with an ambitious program of social and political reform although only a few such laws had been passed and implemented by the end of the year. New parliamentary commissions visited prisons and critically evaluated prison conditions, dealt with judicial reform and addressed implementation of constitutional guarantees concerning freedom of expression. The Press Law, passed in April by the previous parliament, introduced harsh measures that were used to limit freedom of expression. In August, new deputies introduced legislation to reform the Press Law, but the reform was halted by an unprecedented intervention into parliamentary affairs by the Leader. Scores of people were arrested and injured in provincial centres thoughout the year during civil unrest over social conditions, policing and the allocation of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • NCTC Annex of the Country Reports on Terrorism 2008
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 April 2009 ________________________________ United States Department of State Publication Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism Released April 2009 Page | 1 Country Reports on Terrorism 2008 is submitted in compliance with Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (the ―Act‖), which requires the Department of State to provide to Congress a full and complete annual report on terrorism for those countries and groups meeting the criteria of the Act. COUNTRY REPORTS ON TERRORISM 2008 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Strategic Assessment Chapter 2. Country Reports Africa Overview Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership The African Union Angola Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Cote D‘Ivoire Djibouti Eritrea Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Liberia Madagascar Mali Mauritania Mauritius Namibia Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Somalia South Africa Tanzania Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Page | 2 East Asia and Pacific Overview Australia Burma Cambodia China o Hong Kong o Macau Indonesia Japan Republic of Korea (South Korea) Democratic People‘s Republic of Korea (North Korea) Laos Malaysia Micronesia, Federated States of Mongolia New Zealand Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, or Vanaatu Philippines Singapore Taiwan Thailand Europe Overview Albania Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kosovo Latvia Page | 3 Lithuania Macedonia Malta Moldova Montenegro
    [Show full text]
  • Why They Left Stories of Iranian Activists in Exile
    Why They Left Stories of Iranian Activists in Exile Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-971-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org DECEMBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-971-2 Why They Left Stories of Iranian Activists in Exile Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 5 Methodology .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Crimes-In-Iran-.Pdf
    ARTICLE 19 Free Word Centre 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA United Kingdom T: +44 20 7324 2500 F: +44 20 7490 0566 E: [email protected] W: www.article19.org Tw: @article19org Fb: facebook.com/article19org ISBN: 978-1-906586-72-0 © ARTICLE 19, 2013 This work is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works, provided you: 1) give credit to ARTICLE 19; 2) do not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) distribute any works derived from this publication under a licence identical to this one. To access the full legal text of this licence, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/legalcode. ARTICLE 19 would appreciate receiving a copy of any materials in which information from this report is used. 3 Table of contents Glossary and abbreviations 05 Executive summary 06 Methodology 07 Section I – The politicisation of the internet and the Iranian regime’s response 08 Iran’s Computer Crimes Law 09 The rise of the internet in Iran 10 The Iranian state’s response to the rise of the internet 11 Socio-Political developments 11 Developments in Iranian internet infrastructure & policies 13 Regulatory bodies 16 Timeline – A historical overview of the Iranian state’s relationship with the internet 18 Section II – The damage caused by the Computer Crimes Law 23 Expert contributions 24 Dr Ahmed Shaheed, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran 24 Mr Collin D.
    [Show full text]