Anemia in Critically Ill Patients

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anemia in Critically Ill Patients Anemia in Critically Ill Patients E. Potolidis, E. Vakouti, and D. Georgopoulos z Introduction Anemia is a common problem in critically ill patients. Indeed it has been shown that at intensive care unit (ICU) admission the mean hemoglobin concentration (Hb) of critically ill patients is *11 g/dl, while in 60% and 30% of such patients, the mean Hb is less than 12 and 10 g/dl, respectively [1, 2]. It is of interest to note that in these patients the rate of hemoglobin decline is approximately 0.5 g/dl/day during the first days after ICU admission and continues to decline, particularly in pa- tients with severe illness [1]. Thus the majority of critically ill patients exhibit anemia on ICU admission, which persists throughout the duration of their ICU stay. z Causes of Anemia in Critically Ill Patients Several factors contribute to anemia in critically ill patients. The withdrawal of large amounts of blood for diagnostic reasons is an important but largely ignored factor for development of anemia in patients in ICUs [3]. Smoller and Kruskall showed that one half of patients who received blood transfusions had blood losses from phlebotomy that exceeded the equivalent of one unit of blood [4]. A recent European multicenter study (the ABC study) demonstrated that in critically ill pa- tients the blood loss through blood sampling for diagnostic purposes is consider- able, averaging 41 ml/day [1]. Nguyen and colleagues [5] also documented that the mean volume of blood drawn daily for laboratory studies was approximately 40 ml. Considering only septic patients this amount increased to 49 ml. In patients under- going renal replacement therapies the blood loss due to blood sampling may be in the range of 60 ml per day [6]. Obviously this type of blood loss has an impact on blood transfusion. Indeed, Corwin et al. showed a positive relationship between the number of phlebotomies performed for diagnostic purposes and the amount of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions [7]. Furthermore, in the ABC study [1] a positive correlation was observed between organ dysfunction and the number of blood draws and total volume drawn. We should note that in the process of blood sampling the ICU health care work- er has to discard a significant blood volume in order to obtain accurate results. This volume depends on medical practice and may vary from 2 to 10 ml [5]. It is recommended that the discard volume should not be greater than twice the catheter dead-space [8, 9]. Occult bleeding is another important factor that may contribute to anemia in critically ill patients [3]. Stress gastritis (stress ulcer) is a potential source for blood 492 E. Potolidis et al. loss. Surgical patients often have anemia in the postoperative period and should be monitored carefully. Blood loss into the retro-peritoneal space should be suspected and carefully investigated in patients with abdominal trauma who exhibit acute de- cline in hemoglobin. An important cause of anemia in critically ill patients is functional iron deficien- cy [10, 11]. Typically, critically ill patients have elevated serum ferritin concentra- tions, low transferrin saturation, and low serum iron concentration [11, 12]. There- fore, the low serum iron levels are not able to support the heme biosynthesis and the erythropoiesis. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) may be the pathogenic mechanism for this pattern. Cytokines that are released during the in- flammation process, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a and interleukin (IL)-6, may induce the transcription and translation of ferritin and are able to down-regulate transferrin receptor messenger mRNA (iron uptake) [13]. In addition, it has been reported that nitric oxide (NO), which is increased in vasodilator shock, has the ability to reduce the ferrochelatase activity [14], thus contributing to the functional iron deficiency. Ineffective erythropoiesis in patients with critical illness could be the result of vitamin B12 or folic acid deficiency. Data in the literature indicate that these defi- ciencies do not play an important role in the pathogenesis of the anemia in these patients. Indeed, a recent study showed that 2% of critically ill patients were defi- cient in vitamin B12 and another 2% were deficient in folic acid [15]. Nevertheless, these deficiencies are rapidly correctable causes of ineffective erythropoiesis. It has been shown that IL-6 and TNF-a are both able to decrease the life span of RBCs [16, 17]. In addition to the reduced RBC life span due to proinflammatory cytokines, the erythrocytes of critically ill patients show decreased deformability [18]. Reactive oxygen species, increased concentrations of 2,3-DPG into the RBCs, and alterations in intracellular calcium content could be factors responsible for the decreased RBCs deformability [18]. The decrease in RBC deformability may play a role in disturbances in microcirculation, observed in critically ill patients. Inflammatory mediators released during SIRS may also influence the differentia- tion of erythroid progenitor cells. It is well known that cytokines are able to inhibit the differentiation of erythroid progenitor cells [19]. In addition, interferon (IFN)-c is able to induce apoptosis of the human erythroid colony forming cells via Fas ex- pression and caspase activation [19]. Papadaki et al. reported that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (anemia of chronic disease which shares similar characteristics to that of critical illness) exhibit reduced apoptosis of erythroid cells in the bone marrow after treatment with anti-TNF-a antibodies [20]. Histiocytic hyperplasia with hemophagocytosis (HHH), a syndrome observed during sepsis or malignancies, may contribute to anemia in critically ill patients. The syndrome is characterized by single cytopenia (anemia, neutropenia or throm- bocytopenia) or pancytopenia. Strauss et al. [21], in a postmortem clinico- pathologic study investigated 107 patients who were hospitalized and died in the ICU, showed that histiocytic hyperplasia with hemophagocytosis was present in 69 patients (64.5%). Predictors of histiocytic hyperplasia syndrome were treatment in- tensity and non-cardiovascular cause of death. This study demonstrated that sepsis and blood transfusion were triggering factors with a possible synergistic effect [21]. Peritubular interstitial cells in the renal cortex and parenchymal liver cells pro- duce a glycoprotein hormone named erythropoietin (EPO). This hormone binds to the EPO receptor on erythroid progenitor cells and promotes their maturity, while Anemia in Critically Ill Patients 493 on the other hand it decreases their apoptosis. Several studies have shown that EPO also has a neuroprotective effect [22, 23]. In patients with iron deficiency ane- mia, EPO concentration and Hb levels have a negative semilogarithmic correlation [24]. This is not the case in critically ill patients. It has been shown that in these patients for a given hematocrit (Hct) or hemoglobin, EPO plasma levels are signifi- cantly lower than those observed in patients with iron-deficiency anemia [25] (Fig. 1). von Ahsen et al. [12] calculated the erythropoietin response (Dlog/DHb) in ICU patients and noted that it was on average half of the response of patients with uncomplicated non-renal anemia. This phenomenon is referred to as blunted ery- thropoietic response. Studies have shown that the inappropriate low levels of ery- thropoietin significantly contribute to anemia in critically ill patients [26]. The blunted erythropoietic response is thought to result from decrease of erythropoietin gene expression by inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-a, IL-1 and IL-6 [3]. z RBC Transfusion Anemia in critically ill patients results in significant RBCs transfusions. Approxi- mately 40% of critically ill patients receive at least one unit of RBCs, relatively early after ICU admission [1, 2]. The mean number of RBC units transfused approaches five, while the pre-transfusion Hb is *8.5 g/dl, indicating that the large number of transfusions is not due to a very high Hb transfusion threshold [1, 2]. Corwin et al., investigated the transfusion practice of their tertiary care center and found that 85% of critically ill patients with an ICU length of stay greater than one week, re- ceived blood transfusions, with a mean of approximately 9.5 units per patient [7]. It follows that the rate of blood transfusions in these patients is very high [7, 25]. The amount of oxygen delivered to the whole blood (DO2) is given by the fol- lowing equation: DO2 CO Â CaO2 where CO is cardiac output (CO=SV´HR, SV is stroke volume and HR is heart rate) and CaO2 is the oxygen concentration of arterial blood (CaO2 = 1.36 Hb´SaO2+0.003´PaO2). It is apparent that Hb reduction decreases the amount of oxygen delivered to tissues and under certain circumstances may result in tissue hypoxia. It follows that the main goal of RBC transfusion in anemic patients is to prevent or reverse tissue hypoxia by increasing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. We should note however, that in critically ill patients regional blood flow is an important determinant of oxygen supply to cells; severe tissue hypoxia may en- sue despite a normal value of Hb and global DO2 [28, 29]. RBC transfusion is associated with numerous adverse events (Table 1), including infection transmission [30], transfusion associated immunosuppression [27, 31±33], transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI) [34], disturbances in microcircula- tion due to blood storage [35, 36], and allergic reactions [33]. The first reported cases of transfusion-associated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission occurred in 1982. Since then cases of HIV transmission have decreased due to development of antibody detection and p24 antigen detection [27, 37]. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection due to transfusion decreased after the introduction of screening tests for HbsAg in 1975 and the risk of transfusion trans- 494 E. Potolidis et al. Fig. 1. Log plasma concentration of erythropoietin (EPO) concentration as a function of hematocrit (Hct) in patients with uncomplicated iron deficiency anemia (control) and in various groups of critically ill pa- tients.
Recommended publications
  • Critical Care and Resuscitation  Volume 15 Number 2  June 2013 147 BRIEF COMMUNICATION
    BRIEF COMMUNICATION Inappropriate continuation of stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond the intensive care setting KJ Farley, Kerryn L Barned and Tim M Crozier Stress ulceration describes injury of the gastrointestinal (GI) ABSTRACT mucosa in response to stressors such as hypoperfusion, hypoxia, reperfusion, and imbalance between gastric acid Objective: To determine how frequently stress ulcer productionCrit Care and Resusc mucosal ISSN: defence 1441-2772 mechanisms. 13 June 1 Endoscopic prophylaxis (SUP) medications prescribed in the intensive evidence2013 15of 2stress 147-151 ulceration is seen in most patients soon care unit are inappropriately continued on the ward and on ©Crit Care Resusc 20132 afterwww.jficm.anzca.edu. admission to the au/aaccm/journal/publi-intensive care unit, with clinical hospital discharge. severitycations.htm ranging from endoscopic findings only to life- Design: Retrospective cohort study; chart review. Brief communication threatening haemorrhage. Certain subgroups of critically ill Setting: Two Australian ICUs: one tertiary centre and one patients have increased risk of clinically significant GI metropolitan centre. 3,4 bleeding (Table 1), with rates of 3.7% in those with Participants: We included 387 adult, non-pregnant coagulopathy and those needing > 48 hours of mechanical patients who were admitted to the ICU between 1 February ventilation, compared with 0.1% in patients without these 2011 and 31 March 2011 and who survived to hospital 5 risk factors. Clinically significant GI bleeding should be discharge. prevented where possible as it is associated with a signifi- Main outcome measures: Rate of unnecessary cant attributable morbidity, mortality6,7 and increased continuation of ICU-prescribed SUP medications on the length of stay in the ICU.7 ward and on discharge from hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Updates in Stress-Ulcer Prophylaxis
    Updatesinstressulcerprophylaxis:Is pharmacologicalprophylaxisstill indicated? RubenDVillanueva,PharmD,BCCCP,BCPS Assistantprofessor OUHSCCollegeofPharmacy TraumaCriticalCare OUMedicalCenter 1 Objectives • Describethepathophysiologyofstressulcersinthe criticallyill • Compareandcontrastcurrentstressulcerprophylaxis guidelines • Summarizerecentstressulcerprophylaxisliterature • Determineacriticallyillpatient’scontinuedneedfor stressulcerprophylaxis 2 PreͲAssessment Whichofthefollowingistheunderlying pathophysiologicprocessforthedevelopmentof stressulcersintheICU? A) GIhypoperfusion B) Anemia C) Infection D) Hypersecretorystate 3 PreͲAssessment Whichofthefollowinghavebeenidentifiedas independentriskfactorsforclinicallysignificantGI bleedingincriticallyillpatients? A) Sepsis B) Organtransplant C) Vasoactivemedications D) Renalreplacementtherapy 4 PreͲAssessment Enteralnutritionwouldlikelybesufficientforstress ulcerprophylaxisinwhichofthefollowingscenarios? A) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientreceivingcontinuous renalreplacementtherapywithanINRof2 B) MechanicallyventilatedTBIpatientwithout intracranialhypertension C) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientwithchronicliverand kidneydisease,COPD,andreceivingcorticosteroids D) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientwithoutsignificant PMH,anINRof1.9andonnorepinephrine 5 UpdatesinStressUlcerProphylaxis BACKGROUND& PATHOPHYSIOLOGY 6 Background Stressrelatedmucosaldisease/damage • Representsacontinuum – Asymptomaticsuperficiallesionstoclinically significantGIbleeding(GIB) • Twotypes – Stressrelatedinjury – Stressulcers •
    [Show full text]
  • 1. ICU Protocol Management Cover
    ICU Management Protocols Published by Malaysian Society of Intensive Care Printed by Malaysian Society of Intensive Care (MSIC) Unit 1.6, Level 1, Enterprise 3B Technology Park Malaysia Jalan Innovasi 1, Bukit Jalil 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Website: www.msic.org.my In collabration with Ministry of Health Malaysia Copyright © Malaysian Society of Intensive Care Pusat Kebangsaan ISBN Malaysia ISBN 978-967-11415-4-0 Cover design by Nabil bin Ali Disclaimer: The content of this book has been produced in good faith to guide medical practitioners. However practitioners are advised to keep abreast the current evidence-based practices that are constantly evolving and to take into account the local issues and limitations. Foreword There are many aspects in the care and management of the critically ill patient. As clinicians we need to keep abreast with the most current evidence-based practices to ensure optimal patient care and safety. This is an update of the management protocol book written in 2012, to facilitate clinicians in the management of the critically ill. Each protocol was developed with careful consideration of current evidence as well as the practical application and cost containment within our institutions. The algorithms in the protocols are simple to use and can be easily implemented. There are great concerns on the rise of multi-drug resistant organisms. We know that critically ill patients are at high risk of acquiring infections. To address this, a protocol on prevention and control of multi-drug organisms is included. This protocol materialised due to the many hours of discussion and exchange of opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • In Haemorrhagic Shock Induced Gastric Lesions
    Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.29.6.826 on 1 June 1988. Downloaded from Gut, 1988, 29, 826-829 Ranitidine and oxygen derived free radical scavengers in haemorrhagic shock induced gastric lesions E C TSIMOYIANNIS, C J SARROS, J C TSIMOYIANNIS, K MOUTESIDOU, G AKALESTOS, AND 0 B KOTOULAS From the Department ofSurgery, G Hatzikosta General Hospital ofIoannina and Department ofAnatomy, loannina University Medical School, loannina, Greece SUMMARY The role of oxygen derived free radicals in gastric lesions induced by haemorrhagic shock and the protective effect of oxygen radical scavengers, allopurinol and ranitidine, were investigated. Forty five rabbits underwent haemorrhagic shock for 30 minutes and reinfusion ofshed blood. They were killed 30 minutes later. The animals were divided in five groups: A (n=10): Control, B (n=10): intravenous ranitidine pretreatment, C (n=10): oral allopurinol, 24 and 2 h before surgery, D (n= 10): intravenous pretreatment with superoxide Dismutase plus catalase, E (n=5): 60 minute haemorrhagic shock without reinfusion and treatment. Erosions and/or petechiae in all animals in Group A were observed. Three animals in group B and C and 2 in group D (p<0O005, p<0-001) had gastric lesions. The lesions in the pretreatment groups were significantly smaller than in controls. Oxygen radicals plus HCI play an important role in shock induced gastric lesions. Oxygen radical antagonists show a significant protective role. http://gut.bmj.com/ Clinical and experimental studies have shown that the role of oxygen derived free radicals in haemorr- haemorrhagic shock often is followed by rapid hagic shock induced gastric lesions and the protective development of gastric mucosal lesions.' 3 Gastric effect of oxygen radical scavengers, allopurinol (a blood flow is considerably reduced during haemorr- xanthine oxidase inhibitor) and ranitidine (an H2 on October 6, 2021 by guest.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (197Kb)
    Idanosa and Kahn Critical Care 2012, 16:305 http://ccforum.com/content/16/1/305 JOURNAL CLUB CRITIQUE Beyond checklists: Using clinician prompts to achieve meaningful ICU quality improvement Osamudiamen Idahosa1 and Jeremy M Kahn*1-3 University of Pittsburgh Department of Critical Care Medicine: Evidence-Based Medicine Journal Club, edited by Sachin Yende Expanded abstract hospital mortality, ICU length of stay and ventilator Citation associated pneumonia. Weiss CH, Moazed F, McEvoy CA, et al. Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care Results and clinical outcomes: a single-site study. Am J Respir One hundred and forty prompted group patients were Crit Care Med 2011, 184:680-686. Epub 2011 May 26. compared with 125 concurrent control patients and 1283 PubMed PMID: 21616996. pre-intervention patients. Compared with control patients, patients admitted to the service with prompting Background experienced increased ventilator-free days, decreased Checklists may reduce errors of omission for critically ill empirical antibiotic and central venous catheter duration, patients. and increased rates of deep vein thrombosis and stress ulcer prophylaxis. Prompted group patients had lower Methods risk-adjusted ICU mortality compared with the control Objective: To determine whether prompting to use a group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confi dence interval, 0.13– checklist improves process of care and clinical outcomes. 0.96; P = 0.041) and lower hospital mortality compared Design: Prospective, concurrently-controlled cohort study with the control group (10.0 vs. 20.8%; P = 0.014), which with additional historical controls. remained signifi cant after risk adjustment (adjusted odds Setting: Medical intensive Care Unit (MICU) of a tertiary ratio, 0.34; 95% confi dence interval, 0.15–0.76; P = 0.008).
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Legionnaire's Disease Requiring Intensive Care Treatment
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository I‘he Netherlands JOURNALOF MEDICINE ELSEVTER NetherlandsJournal of Medicine 4Y (I 996) I Y6620 I Original article Severe Legionnaire’s disease requiring intensive care treatment I.C. van Riemsdijk-van Overbeeke s’, B. van den Berg ’ Abstract Bwkgwund: Legionnaire’s disease is well known as severe pneumonia requiring intensive care treatment in many cases. In this study the clinical course is described of patients admitted to the medical ICU of the University Hospital of Rotterdam for respiratory distress due to Legionnaire’s disease. Methods: From the register of admissions to the medical ICU all patients suffering from Legionnaire’s disease were identified. All data on clinical signs and symptoms present on admission were collected. The circumstances in which the infections were contracted were sought, as well as the tests establishing the diagnosis. The occurrence of various organ failures and complications were noted, as were the causes of death on the KU. Resdts: From 1978 till 1995 the diagnosis of Legionellu pneumonia was made in I7 patients admitted to the ICU: in I3 patients a community-acquired infection was established. As in I2 patients Legionnaire‘s disease was diagnosed on serological tests, it took several weeks before the diagnosis could be established in these patients. In all patients the circumstances predisposing to Legionnaire’s disease were noted. Respiratory distress was present in all patients, ventilatory support was required in 14. Apart from this, both profound shock and renal failure were commonly encountered. As complications jaundice, rhabdomyolysis and polyneuropathy were frequently noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL Guideline for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit Kristian Rørbæk Madsen, Kristian Lorentzen, Niels Clausen, Emilie Øberg, Peter Roy Casparij Kirkegaard, Nana Maymann-Holler & Morten Hylander Møller. This guideline has been approved by the Danish Society of Anesthesiology and to Danish conditions are few. Thus the current incidence of stress Intensive Care Medicine (DASAIM) and the Danish Society of Intensive Care Medicine ulcer bleeding in ICU patients is largely unknown. (DSIT) 26 January 2014 Correspondence: Kristian Rørbæk Madsen, Department of Anesthesiology and Risk factors Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Soendre Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, In a prospective multicenter cohort study (n=2256) by Cook et al, Denmark risk factors for clinically important GI bleeding were mechanical E-mail: [email protected] ventilation for more than 48 hours (odds ratio 15.6) and coagulopathy (odds ratio 4.3) 3. Other commonly cited, but less Conflicts of interests: Morten Hylander Møller is the initiator of the “SUP-ICU re- validated risk factors include severe sepsis and septic shock as search programme” (www.sup-icu.com). The remaining authors reported no con- flicts of interests. stated by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines; head or spinal trauma, hepatic failure, renal failure, major burns, organ trans- plantation, high dose glucocorticoid therapy, previous peptic 1,10 Dan Med J 2014;61(3):C4811. ulcer disease or upper GI bleeding . Last literature review: Nov 1 2013 Prognosis Limitations : Applies to patients aged > 18 years Stress ulcer bleeding is a serious complication. Cook et al. demon- strated a mortality rate of 49%, mostly from decompensation of List of abbreviations: an underlying condition or multiorgan failure, compared to 9% for H2RA = histamine-2-receptor antagonist patients without GI bleeding 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Discontinue Stress, Discontinue Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
    Volume 22, Number 1 January 2008 Drugs & Therapy B � U � L � L � E � T � I � N FORMULARY UPDATE PRESCRIBING The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee met November 20, 2007. Discontinue stress, discontinue 2 drugs were added in the Formu- lary, and 4 drugs or dosage forms stress ulcer prophylaxis were deleted. 5 drugs or dosage tress ulcers are superficial lesions should be discontinued in patients with- forms were designated nonformulary involving the mucosal layer of the out an additional indication for use (eg, and not available. Criteria for use S stomach that appear after major stressful gastrointestinal reflux disease [GERD] or were changed for 3 drugs. events.1 Critically ill patients admitted history of GI bleed). When a patient trans- to intensive care units (ICUs) are at an fers or is discharged from an ICU, there is ◆ ADDED increased risk for suffering from compli- an opportunity to discontinue SUP. Ambrisentan cations related to stress ulceration.2 As An audit of SUP use in the ICUs at (Letairis® by Gilead Sciences)* such, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is Shands at UF was recently conducted. *Restricted to patients approved for the appropriate for many critically ill patients. Thirty adult patients receiving SUP were Letairis Education and Access Program SUP is defined as any medication used followed during their hospital admis- to prevent formation of stress ulcers and sion, beginning upon admission to the Anidulafungin includes antacids, sucralfate, prostaglan- surgical intensive care unit (SICU). When (Eraxis® by Pfizer)† din analogues, histamine H2-receptor mechanical ventilation and coagulopathy †Restricted to approval by the ID antagonists, and proton-pump inhibitors were no longer present, SUP was no lon- Consult Service, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential: for Review Only Efficacy and Safety of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    BMJ Confidential: For Review Only Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: systematic review and network meta-analysis Journal: BMJ Manuscript ID BMJ-2019-052088 Article Type: Research BMJ Journal: BMJ Date Submitted by the 08-Aug-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Wang, Ying; Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Pharmacy YE, ZHIKANG; McMaster University, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact Ge, Long; School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Evidence Based Social Science Research Center; School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Evidence Based Medicine Center Siemieniuk, Reed; McMaster University, Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact Wang, Xin; Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Wang, Yingkai; Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Hou, Liangying; Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China Ma, Zhuo; Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Agoritsas, Thomas; McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; University Hospitals of Geneva, Division of General Internal Medicine & Division of Epidemiology Vandvik, Per; Innlandet Hospital Trust-divisjon Gjøvik, Department of Medicine Perner, Anders; Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Dept. of Intensive Care 4131 Møller, Morten; Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet,
    [Show full text]
  • ERR-0107-2019 Table S5
    Table S5. Studies included in the systematic reviews with meta-analysis Diagnosis of Inclusion Intervention (I) and Cointerventions a Study n Characteristic of Exclusion criteria VAP criteria Control (C) groups and VAP Bundle b ICU/ patients Surgical ICU (I): Cointervention: Polyurethane- Patients transferred from other TaperGuard EVACTM tubes: cone shape cuff (I): hospitals, urgent intubation in equipped with SSD port, APACHE II: 22.6 ± 5.1 MV>48h, clinical wards other than ICU, history polyurethane and cone shape VAP bundle: ICU LOS: 15 ± 5 features (CPIS) and Age between 18 and of MV, pregnancy, HIV, cuff. - Head elevation of 45º. Duration MV: 11.6 ± 7.1 bacterial pathogens 80 yr requiring immunosuppression, Method of SSD: Intermittent Mahmoodpoor - Protocolized enteral feeding. 276 ≥104 CFU/ml in mechanical ventilation leukopenia, patient refusal, and every 6h et al, 2017 - Sedation with washout periods. quantitative culture for more than 72 hours acute respiratory distress - Oral hygiene with (C): from bronchoalveolar with placement of an syndrome. Patients who were (C): chlorhexidine. APACHE II: 21.4 ± 4.4 lavage. endotracheal tube receiving antibiotics at the time Conventional high-volume - Hand washing. ICU LOS: 18 ± 10 of intubation, and those who low-pressure endotracheal - Pantoprazol for stress ulcer Duration MV: 12.3 ± 10.5 need a PEEP>5cm H2O. tubes prophylaxis. ICUs at Harborview Cointervention: Polyurethane- Medical Center. (I): cuffed 1) a polyurethane-conical (I): Patients with out-of-hospital shaped cuffed tube VAP bundle: SAPS II: 60 ± 12 cardiac arrest. 2) a polyurethane- conical - Head elevation of 45º. ICU LOS: N/A Adults (>18 yr of age) Use of a non–study-designated shaped cuffed tube with - Protocolized enteral feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Clinical Guidelines
    Last Approval Date: November 2019 Policy Title: Pharmacist-Managed Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Protocol Departments Affected: Pharmacy Page 1 of 5 Key Words: SUP, PPI, H2RA Reference #: 1835 I. PURPOSE: To ensure safe, evidence-based utilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the inpatient setting to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding while minimizing the associated adverse effects (Clostridium dificile colitis, nosocomial pneumonia, electrolyte abnormalities, vitamin deficiencies, drug interactions, thrombocytopenia, etc) through use of a standardized, pharmacist-managed protcol. II. POLICY: It is the policy of SHC to provide a process for pharmacists to discontinue or convert stress ulcer prophylaxis therapies (proton pump inhibitors to histamine-2 receptor agonists) in the inpatient setting to align with current practice guidelines and literature. Exclusions: Continuation of home therapy or PRN use in the inpatient setting Use of acid suppression therapy for treatment indications III. PROCEDURE: A. Evaluation 1. Pharmacists will screen patients receiving scheduled acid suppression therapy for indication at the time of order verification and on a daily basis thereafter. 2. If the indication for PPI or H2RA use is treatment as listed below, or the frequency is PRN (as needed), the pharmacist will not intervene. a. Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome b. Acute upper GI bleed c. Erosive esophagitis d. Helicobacter pylori treatment e. Gastric or duodenal ulcer f. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) g. Continuation of home therapy 3. If the indication for PPI or H2RA use is stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), pharmacists will perform a detailed review of the patient’s chart to determine whether the patient meets any of the following approved criteria for therapy4: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit – Adult/Pediatric/Neonatal – Inpatient Clinical Practice Guideline
    Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit – Adult/Pediatric/Neonatal – Inpatient Clinical Practice Guideline Note: Active Table of Contents – Click to follow link EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS – ADULT ICU PATIENTS .................................................................... 8 RECOMMENDATIONS – PEDIATRIC ICU PATIENTS ............................................................10 RECOMMENDATIONS – NEONATAL ICU PATIENTS ............................................................10 RECOMMENDATIONS – ADULT, PEDIATRIC, AND NEONATAL ICU PATIENTS ................12 UW HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................13 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................14 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]