DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Policy Efficiency and Effectiveness to Save More Species: a Case 4 Study of the Megadiverse Country Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Policy Efficiency and Effectiveness to Save More Species: a Case 4 Study of the Megadiverse Country Australia 1 BIOC-D-14-00498_R1 2 3 Title: Improving policy efficiency and effectiveness to save more species: a case 4 study of the megadiverse country Australia. 5 6 7 Corresponding author 8 Jane McDonald 9 [email protected] 10 School of Biological Sciences 11 University of Queensland 12 St Lucia, 4072 13 Brisbane, Australia 14 Telephone: + 61 410 204 880 15 16 Author addresses 17 Dr Josie Carwardine 18 CSIRO, Ecosystem Sciences 19 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park 20 Brisbane 4102 21 Australia 22 23 Dr Liana Joseph 24 Global Conservation Program 25 Wildlife Conservation Society 26 Bronx, New York 10460 27 USA 28 29 School of Biological Sciences 30 University of Queensland 31 St Lucia Queensland 4072 32 Australia 33 34 Dr Carissa Klein 35 School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management 36 University of Queensland 37 St Lucia Queensland 4072 38 Australia 39 40 Dr Tracy Rout 41 School of Biological Sciences 42 University of Queensland 43 St Lucia Queensland 4072 44 Australia 45 46 Associate Professor James Watson 47 Global Conservation Program 48 Wildlife Conservation Society 49 Bronx, New York 10460 1 50 USA 51 52 School of Biological Sciences and School of Geography, Planning and 53 Environmental Management, 54 University of Queensland 55 St Lucia Queensland 4072 56 Australia 57 58 Professor Stephen Garnett 59 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods 60 Charles Darwin University 61 Ellengowan Drive 62 Casuarina NT 0909 63 Australia 64 65 Associate Professor Michael McCarthy 66 School of Botany 67 University of Melbourne 68 Parkville Victoria 3010 69 Australia 70 71 Professor Hugh Possingham 72 School of Biological Sciences 73 University of Queensland 74 St Lucia Queensland 4072 75 Australia 76 77 78 2 79 Abstract 80 Native flora and fauna species continue to decline in the megadiverse, wealthy, 81 economically and politically stable nation of Australia despite current efforts in 82 policy and management. Ongoing research is examining these declines, their 83 causes, and the adequacy of current policy, but strategies for improving the 84 outcomes for threatened species have attracted less attention. We discuss 85 several key aspects of Australia’s national threatened species management 86 approach that potentially hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of management: 87 the threatened species listing process is lengthy and biased; recovery plan 88 development is resource intensive, restricted to a subset of species and often not 89 effective; funding for threatened species management is not allocated efficiently 90 or transparently; and management is not designed to incorporate uncertainties 91 and adapt to changing future threats. Based on these issues we recommend four 92 changes to current process: rationalize listing and assessment processes; 93 develop approaches to prioritize species-based and threat-based responses cost- 94 effectively; estimate funds required to recover species and secure longer term 95 funding; and, accommodate uncertainties and new threats into the current 96 planning framework. Cost-effective prioritization for species and threats 97 identifies which actions are likely to achieve the greatest benefits to species per 98 unit cost, thereby managing more species and threats with available funds. These 99 improvements can be made without legislative reform, additional funding or 100 socio-economic shifts. If implemented, we believe more Australian threatened 101 species will benefit from current efforts. Many of the challenges facing Australia 102 are analogous to issues in other countries including the United States, Canada 103 and the United Kingdom and these recommendations could assist in improving 104 threatened species management. 105 106 Key words: endangered species, prioritisation, policy, cost-effective, threatened 107 species, Australia. 108 109 Introduction 110 Policy interventions in Australia have been unable to halt the loss of species and 111 prevent further extinctions (Environment and Communications References 112 Committee 2013; Garnett et al. 2011; Woinarski et al. 2014). It is likely the 113 challenges facing policy makers will be even greater with accelerating climate 114 change, continued population growth and land use change targeted towards 115 increased food and fibre production (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). 116 Considerable research has measured species loss in Australia, identified causes 117 of declines, and assessed the effectiveness of current management and policy 118 (Bottrill et al. 2011; Evans et al. 2011; Ford et al. 2001; Garnett et al. 2011; Kelly 119 et al. 2003; Kingsford et al. 2009; Moseby & Read 2006; Ritchie 2013; Ritchie et 120 al. 2013; Short & Smith 1994; Steffen et al. 2009; Szabo et al. 2012; Taylor et al. 121 2011; Walsh et al. 2012; Watson et al. 2011; Woinarski et al. 2011). The recently 122 released Action Plan for Australian Mammals, for example, warns that as well as 123 the highest modern record of mammalian extinctions a large proportion of 124 extant mammals are under threat and urges urgent and targeted actions to avoid 125 further extinctions (Woinarski et al. 2014). Although Australia is not alone in 126 experiencing unprecedented rates of extinction (Mace 2005), it presents a 3 127 compelling example of how efforts to manage threatened species in a 128 megadiverse country can be ineffective in avoiding species loss despite economic 129 wealth, relatively good governance and globally recognized scientific expertise. 130 We believe this situation needs urgent attention and recommend four feasible 131 ways to improve national management of threatened species in Australia. 132 The need for improved threatened species management in Australia is urgent 133 (Lindenmayer 2008; Woinarski et al. 2014). Over 10% of mammal species (29) 134 have already become extinct since European settlement in the late 17th Century 135 (Woinarski et al. 2014) and 15% of remaining mammals are listed as threatened 136 (State of the Environment Committee 2011). There is mounting evidence that 137 small mammal populations in northern Australia – a region that is considered to 138 contain the largest area of intact tropical savanna left in the world - are in rapid 139 decline (Woinarski et al. 2011). Recently two species on Christmas Island in the 140 Indian Ocean, a microbat (Pipistrellus murrayi) and a lizard Emoia nativitatis are 141 now presumed to be extinct (Beeton 2010; Woinarski & Cogger 2013). The iconic 142 Orange-bellied Parrot (Neophema chrysogaster) is close to extinction in the wild 143 and 23 species of bird have become extinct and at least four other bird species 144 are also possibly extinct since European settlement of Australia in 1788 (Garnett 145 et al. 2011). The large majority of listed bird species continue to decline (Garnett 146 et al. 2011). The few that have recovered (Gould’s Petrel Pterodroma leucoptera 147 leucoptera and Lord Howe Woodhen Gallirallus sylvestris, for example) represent 148 significant success stories of what can be achieved when adequate resources and 149 expertise are applied. When assessments are conducted, it has been found that 150 very significant proportions of once common widespread amphibians, reptiles 151 and plants are threatened with extinction (up to 52%, 37% and 30% 152 respectively; (State of the Environment Committee 2011). The extinction of the 153 Christmas Island Pipistrelle and the poor outlook for threatened species in 154 general has been the subject of renewed debate. In response, the Australian 155 Senate established an inquiry in 2012-3 into the effectiveness of threatened 156 species management in Australia to which the recommendations in this paper 157 were submitted (Environment and Communications References Committee 158 2013). Recently the Australian Government also appointed a Threatened Species 159 Commissioner with a mandate to prevent further extinctions (Environment 160 Department 2014; 161 http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/commissioner). 162 The major threats to threatened species in Australia include habitat loss, 163 introduced species, inappropriate fire regimes, over-exploitation and disease 164 (Evans et al. 2011). In the long-term, protection and recovery of threatened 165 species in Australia depends on trends in socio-economic drivers such as 166 population growth, per capital consumption and economic growth (Millennium 167 Ecosystem Assessment 2005; State of the Environment Committee 2011), the 168 strength of regulatory protection (Environment and Communications References 169 Committee 2013; Kingsford et al. 2009), the funds to enact protection and 170 amelioration of impacts (Carwardine et al. 2012; McCarthy et al. 2008) and 171 governance arrangements to ensure implementation (Hajkowicz 2009; Morrison 172 et al. 2010). Changing the level of any of these factors is a significant 173 undertaking, requiring shifts in social and economic trends, increased political 4 174 will, more funds and legislative reform. There are, however, gains to be made for 175 threatened species that are feasible within the current policy arrangements and 176 achievable in the short term at no extra cost. By improving the effectiveness and 177 efficiency of Australia’s existing national approach to threatened species, we 178 propose the outcomes for threatened species can be increased and thereby 179 extend the reach of current protection to more species. 180 Threatened species (synonymous with “endangered species” in the United 181 States) have been protected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A World Where People and Nature Thrive
    A world where people and nature thrive The Nature Conservancy acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the places in which we work and honours the deep cultural, social, environmental, spiritual and economic connection they share with their lands and waters. ii The Nature Conservancy CONTENTS WELCOME FROM THE NATURE CONSERVANCY AUSTRALIA ................................... 2 ABOUT US ................................................................................................................................ 3 WHERE WE’RE WORKING ....................................................................................................4 PRIORITISING OUR EFFORTS .............................................................................................. 5 OUR IMPACT ............................................................................................................................6 OUR PRIORITIES ...................................................................................................................... 7 TROPICAL SAVANNAS ..........................................................................................................8 OUTBACK DESERTS ............................................................................................................. 10 TIMELINE OF ACHIEVEMENTS ..........................................................................................12 MURRAY-DARLING BASIN .................................................................................................. 14 GREAT SOUTHERN REEFS ....................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Management for Woodhen and LHI Currawong Associated with the Lord Howe Island Rodent Eradication Project
    Taronga Conservation Society Australia Captive management for Woodhen and LHI Currawong associated with the Lord Howe Island Rodent Eradication project March 2014 This report details work that occurred in the provision of captive care of Lord Howe Island Woodhen and Lord Howe Island Currawong between July 22 and October 18 2013. It details some of the preparatory work, but concentrates on recommendations for proposed work an order of magnitude larger in 2017. Approved Version: 2.0 March 2014 Page 1 of 10 Taronga Conservation Society Australia 1. Executive Summary The Lord Howe Island Board has been granted approximately $9 million to conduct an eradication program of introduced rats and mice from Lord Howe Island (LHI). This work is jointly funded through the Australian Government's Department of Environment, and the NSW Government's Environmental Trust and was announced on July 15 2012. The eradication will be via the dense distribution of a bait containing brodifacoum in a single 100 day baiting operation. Ship rats are implicated in the extinction of at least five endemic birds and at least 13 invertebrates. They are also a recognised threat to at least 13 other bird species, 2 reptiles, 51 plant species, 12 vegetation communities and numerous threatened invertebrates1. Taronga Conservation Society Australia (Taronga) was contacted in July 2009 about potential involvement in the program. It initially played an advisory role, though with the clear intention of operational involvement should the funding application be successful. A detailed risk assessment is presented which determines the risks to the environment (including wildlife, freshwater and marine habitats), humans, livestock and pets.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make Biological Conservation a Success
    How to make conservation a success How to make biological conservation a success Hugh Possingham Summary I discuss some of the research we have completed in our conservation science centres over the past 15 years and how it has delivered conservation outcomes in policy and on the ground, both nationally and globally. First, I will illustrate our approach to prioritising actions and species triage. This cost-effectiveness ap- proach has recently been adopted by two states – why isn’t it more widely used? Second, we have developed a tool for building networks of marine and terrestrial reserves called Marxan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Marxan). I will explain how it was used to rezone the Great Barrier Reef at the beginning of this century, and some of the benefits and pitfalls of its application globally. Marxan is now used for spatial planning in over 140 countries. Finally I will explain some of our thinking about how and why to invest in monitoring for nature conservation. Why is a logical approach to monitoring so hard to pursue, or is it just a matter of time? I conclude that our approaches eventually deliver conservation outcomes and efficiencies; however the path to adoption is very slow. There are two keys to our success in delivering conservation outcomes in the real world. First we work closely with government, not just in delivering research outcomes but also in formulating the problems we tackle through partnerships. Building this relationship consumes 20 % of my working life and requires respect and consideration – although it has frustrating moments. The reward of collaboration includes fifty million dollars of applied research income on top of protecting a large amount of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Edward T Game [email protected] Nationality: Australian Current Address: The Nature Conservancy Level 1, 48 Montague Road South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia Web: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/ourscientists/eddie-game.xml http://blog.nature.org/science/author/egame/ Education 02/05-03/08 PhD (Catastrophes, resilience, and the theory of designing marine reserves) University of Queensland, Australia Supervised by Professor Hugh Possingham 02/99-10/02 Bachelor of Marine Biology (First Class Honors) James Cook University, Australia Minor in Anthropology and Archaeology Employment Summary 04/15-Pres. Lead Scientist, Asia-Pacific, The Nature Conservancy • Providing leadership on the direction of conservation planning, monitoring and conservation science in TNC, and the staff capacity needed to support this direction. • Manage project teams from across the organization. • Work closely with senior leadership to ensure appropriate science support for major organizational decisions. • Technical support for priority projects. 08/13-04/15 Senior Scientist, Conservation Science Division, The Nature Conservancy • Providing leadership on the direction of conservation planning, monitoring and conservation science in TNC, and the staff capacity needed to support this direction. • Manage project teams from across the organization. • Work closely with senior leadership to ensure appropriate science support for major organizational decisions. • Technical support for priority projects. 11/09-Pres. Adjunct Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland • Undergraduate and graduate program lectures. • Co-supervision of students. • Establishing collaborations between university staff and The Nature Conservancy. 08/08-08/13 Conservation Planning Specialist, Conservation Science Division, The Nature Conservancy • Provide direct conservation planning support to TNC projects globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithol. Sci. 18(2): 169-175
    Ornithol Sci 18: 169 – 175 (2019) REVIEW ARTICLE Preventing the extinction of the Lord Howe Woodhen (Hypotaenidia sylvestris) through predator eradication and population augmentation Dean PORTELLI1 and Nicholas CARLILE2,# 1 Department of Environment and Natural Resources, P.O. Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT, 0871 Australia 2 Office of Environment and Heritage, P.O. Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW, 2220 Australia ORNITHOLOGICAL Abstract The Lord Howe Woodhen (Hypotaenidia sylvestris) is endemic to Lord Howe Island off the mid-east coast of Australia and came perilously close to extinc- SCIENCE tion as a result of hunting pressure and introduced predators. A recovery program was © The Ornithological Society implemented in the 1970s to reverse the decline of the species through eradicating of Japan 2019 introduced predators (pigs, cats and goats) and augmenting the population through an in situ captive-breeding program. In 1980, three wild breeding pairs were taken into captivity from Mount Gower. Over the four years of the captive-breeding program, 76 chicks were produced from the original founders and their progeny and an additional four chicks were artificially reared from eggs collected from a wild pair. Almost all woodhens were liberated across four release sites, but only 13% of released birds were resighted and numbers increased at only one of these sites and then declined. A captive-bred female that was released into the lowlands paired with a wild male (which had been temporarily held in captivity) and bred prolifically, leading to rapid population growth in the lowlands. The subpopulation on Mount Gower increased fivefold in the decade following the captive-breeding program, despite the removal of the three breeding pairs (which were released elsewhere) and receiving no aug- mentation from the captive-breeding program.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Decisions Group Director Hugh Possingham Bsc. Dphil FAA the Committee Secretary Senate Standing
    Environmental Decisions Group Director Hugh Possingham BSc. DPhil FAA www.edg.org.au The Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 April 4, 2014 To whom it may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission to the Senate Committee Inquiry into environmental offsets. The Environmental Decisions Group (EDG) is a network of conservation researchers working on the science of effective decision making to better conserve biodiversity. The EDG includes a variety of Australian and International research centres, hubs and teams, all focused on Environmental Decisions Science. Several of our members have been involved in research relating to environmental offsets over many years (please see list of relevant publications below). Our members have also assisted with the development of offset policy, guidelines and decision support tools at state, national, and international levels, and worked collaboratively with the Department of the Environment to develop the EPBC Act Offsets Assessment Guide. Our primary funding sources are: a national Environmental Research Program hub (NERP hub), an Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions and other Australian Research Council grants. Our collective experience is that there are substantial problems with the way in which most offset approaches are designed, implemented and monitored. Here, we summarise the main issues of relevance to the use of environmental offsets in federal environmental approvals in Australia that contribute to the risk of poor environmental outcomes. 1. Monitoring, evaluation and compliance is poor to non-existent There is a severe lack of information on the performance of environmental offsetting in Australia to date, and so there is no way to tell whether the ‘no net loss’/’improve or maintain’ policy objective of environmental offsetting is being achieved or not.
    [Show full text]
  • UQ Spatial Ecology Lab Interests in Coral Triangle Conservation
    UQ Spatial Ecology Lab The Applied Enviro nmental www.uq.edu.au/spatialecology/ Decision Analysis hub www.aeda.edu.au Interests in Coral Triangle conservation science and planning: People and projects I. Development of, and training in, marine reserve design tools (Marxan and Marxan with zoning) and conservation resource allocation methods. Professional exchange opportunities exist for conservation managers, technical experts, academics, and students. Lead researchers: Professor Hugh Possingham , Mr Matt Watts, Ms Carissa Klein, Dr Kerrie Wilson, Mr Dan Segan and Ms Lindsay Kircher Funding and collaborators: TNC (Indonesia), AEDA (DEWHA), contracts Project Description: Marxan is the most widely used marine conservation planning tool in the world http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan/ , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxan . It was used to inform the rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef and is now used in over 80 countries to build marine and terrestrial systems of protected areas . Marxan is changing the face of much of the planet’s surface. We run regular training courses http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan/index.html?page=77690 on Marxan that have included people from Coral Triangle countries. New ideas and methods (see other projects, below) are being progressively included into Marxan, and tested on case studies, some in the Coral Triangle (see links, above). In particular Marxan can now do multiple-use zoning, incorporate asymmetric connectivity and accommodate the possibility of catastrophes like coral bleaching in how it sets conservation priorities. The Australian government used Marxan to inform the rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef – the largest systematically designed network of marine reserves in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Masked Owl)
    The Minister included this species in the vulnerable category, effective from 19 August 2010 Advice to the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendment to the list of Threatened Species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Reason for Conservation Assessment by the Committee This advice follows assessment of new information provided through the Species Information Partnership with Tasmania on: Tyto novaehollandiae castanops [Tasmanian population] (Tasmanian Masked Owl) 2. Summary of Species Details Taxonomy Conventionally accepted as Tyto novaehollandiae castanops (Gould, 1837; Higgins, 1999; Christidis and Boles, 2008). There are three other subspecies of Tyto novaehollandiae which occur within Australia. Tyto novaehollandiae novaehollandiae occurs in southeast Queensland, eastern New South Wales, Victoria, southern South Australia and southern Western Australia. Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli is listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act and occurs in northeast Queensland, the Northern Territory and northeast Western Australia. Tyto novaehollandiae melvillensis is listed as endangered under the EPBC Act and occurs on Melville Island and Bathurst Island (Higgins, 1999; DPIPWE, 2009). State Listing Status Listed as endangered under the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. Description A large owl, weighing up to 1260 g, with a wingspan of up to 128 cm. Females are larger and heavier than males and considerably darker. The upperparts of this subspecies are dark brown to light chestnut in colour, with white speckling. The prominent facial disc is buff to chestnut coloured, with a darker margin, and chestnut coloured shading around the eyes. The legs are fully feathered and the feet are powerful with long talons (Higgins, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Marxan Is the Most Widely Used Conservation Planning Software in the World - Managing More Than 5 Per Cent of the Earth’S Surface
    Marxan is the most widely used conservation planning software in the world - managing more than 5 per cent of the Earth’s surface. Photo: CIFOR, Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Photo: CIFOR, Flickr CC BY-NC-ND (https://flic.kr/p/aENHCv) Free and open source Used by NGOs, universities Supported by an and governments in more international team of than 180 countries conservation experts Marxan empowers The free software is used by Marxan makes it easy to government agencies, NGOs balance complex environmental planners to make and corporations to design factors such as commercial better conservation networks of protected areas and recreation interests, social decisions. (nature reserves) on the land and cultural requirements and and in the sea. biological conservation. www.uq.edu.au/marxan WHAT MARXAN CAN DO CREATING CHANGE Marxan allows policy makers and planners and auditable planning options to design or Balancing priorities in East Kalimantan rainforest to design the most effective conservation prioritise protected areas. Tropical rainforest habitat has many uses ranging from protecting animals to producing measures. Developed by teams at The University of timber, with each making a different contribution to biodiversity conservation. The software takes into account the costs and Queensland and The University of Adelaide, led The degree of protection offered can vary, with production forests sometimes offering benefits of complex environmental decisions, by Professor Hugh Possingham, Marxan is the more safety than protected forests. The sensitivity of species to habitat modification and rather than just focussing on the size of a result of PhD research into how mathematical degradation determines how much protection is offered to them by different land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Hugh Possingham ARC Federation Fellow ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions School of Mathematics and Physics the University of Queensland
    Professor Hugh Possingham ARC Federation Fellow ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland Biography: Hugh’s PhD was in biomathematics at Oxford University funded by a Rhodes scholarship. Following postdocs at Stanford and ANU, Hugh was as a lecturer in Applied Mathematics at The University of Adelaide in 1990. After that he drifted to the dark side – ecology and conservation – becoming the Foundation Professor and Chair of Environmental Science at The University of Adelaide. In 2000 he moved to a Professorship at The University of Queensland jointly between mathematics and biology. In 2001 Hugh was awarded an Australian Mathematics Society medal for a mathematician under the age of 40. http://www.austms.org.au/The+Australian+Mathematical+Society+Medal Hugh has co‐authored over 353 refereed publications covered by the Web of Science (24 in Science, Nature or PNAS) and has 10,000 Web of Science citations. He currently directs two research centres and has supervised (or is supervising) 53 PhD students and 42 postdoctoral fellows. The Possingham group have developed the most widely used conservation planning software in the world. Marxan www.ecology.uq.edu.au/marxan.htm was used to underpin the rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef, and is currently used in over 100 countries by over 3,000 users from the UK and USA to Madagascar and Brazil – to build the world’s marine and terrestrial landscape plans. Most recently Marxan was used to develop the biggest marine reserve system in the world – Australia’s federal marine reserve system.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Hugh Possingham
    Professor Hugh Possingham Director of the Ecology Centre The University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia Email: [email protected] Hugh completed Applied Mathematics Honours at The University of Adelaide in 1984. After attaining a Rhodes Scholarship in 1984 Hugh completed his D.Phil at Oxford University in 1987. Postdoctoral research periods followed at Stanford University and at the Australian National University (as a QEIII Fellow). In 1991 he took a Lectureship, later Senior Lectureship, in Applied Mathematics at The University of Adelaide. In 1995 he was appointed Foundation Chair and Professor of the Department of Environmental Science at the Roseworthy campus of The University of Adelaide. In July 2000 Hugh took up a joint Professorship between the Departments of Zoology & Entomology, and Mathematics at The University of Queensland. In February 2001 The Ecology Centre was established with Hugh as Director. From 2003-2007 Hugh was an ARC Professorial Research Fellow. Professor Possingham is currently an ARC Federation fellow (2007 – 2011) and Director of a Commonwealth Environment Research Facility – Applied Environmental Decision Analysis. The Possingham lab includes nine postdoctoral researchers and twenty-five PhD students working on empirical and theoretical aspects of the applied population ecology of plants and animals. Particular areas of recent research include marine reserve design, optimal landscape reconstruction for birds, metapopulation dynamics of plants and animals, population viability analysis, kangaroo and koala management, and optimal weed control (as part of the Weeds CRC). The lab has a unifying interest in environmental applications of decision theory. Hugh has published over 100 refereed articles and book chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Possingham Citation Thursday 2 May 2019, 2.00Pm Chancellor, It
    Hugh Possingham citation Thursday 2 May 2019, 2.00pm Chancellor, it gives me great pleasure to present to you Hugh Philip Possingham. The Honorary Degree of Doctor of Science (honoris causa) is being awarded to Professor Hugh Possingham in acknowledgement of his internationally recognised pioneering research into endangered species, conservation biology and ecological planning. Professor Possingham completed a Bachelor of Science with Honours in Applied Mathematics at the University of Adelaide in 1984. He was awarded the Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford University, and completed his Doctor of Philosophy in ecology and mathematics at Oxford in 1987. Professor Possingham returned to Australia on a Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship, undertaking research at the Australian National University into the application of population viability analysis to conservation. He rejoined the University of Adelaide as a staff member, and was promoted to Professor in 1995. In 2000, Professor Possingham took up a Chair in the departments of Mathematics and Biological Sciences at the University of Queensland. In 2001, he became director of The Ecology Centre, where he has remained as both an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow and as an ARC Federation Fellow. He currently holds a number of positions including: Chief Scientist of The Nature Conservancy: Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; Director of the Centre of Biodiversity and Conservation Science; and Director of a National Environmental Science Program Hub. The Possingham lab works on formulating and solving biodiversity problems and settling conservation priorities through advances in spatial ecology, and decision support tools for fire, weed and pest management.
    [Show full text]