Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling In Aboriginal Communities

FIVE COMMUNITY FINAL RESEARCH REPORTS

1ST OF TWO PROJECT FINAL REPORTS

Prepared by:

Harold J. Wynne, Ph.D. and John McCready, Ph.D.

Submitted on Behalf of:

Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres and the Métis Nation of Ontario to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre

JUNE 2005

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this final report are those of the investigator(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC).

Note: Final research reports submitted to the OPGRC are reviewed and edited by the Centre’s staff prior to posting; however, to preserve the views and opinions offered by study participants in each of the Aboriginal communities, the contents of this document have not been edited as per this standard practice.

TABLE OF REPORTS

MOOSONEE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY ………………………………………………… 1

NIAGARA REGION ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY ………………………………………... 46

NORTH BAY ABORGINAL COMMUNITY ………………………………………………… 85

OTTAWA ABORGINAL COMMUNITY …………………………………………………….. 119

THUNDER BAY ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY ……………………………………………. 181

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLGC) allocates a portion of gambling revenues to the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) for treatment, prevention, and research to address the issue of problem gambling in Ontario. The funding for this research project was provided from this allocation. This contribution from the OLGC is gratefully acknowledged.

The MOHLTC and the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC) have been working together over the past five years to facilitate research into gambling and the issue of problem gambling in “special populations” (e.g., youth, seniors, ethnic, and aboriginal communities) in Ontario. The MOHLTC allocated funding for this research, which was managed by the OPGRC, and the contributions of these two organizations is gratefully acknowledged.

The Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres (OFIFC) (http://www.ofifc.org) and the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) (http://www.metisnation.org) are both active in providing leadership to programs and services for their people and communities throughout Ontario. The OFIFC and MNO formed a partnership to undertake this study of gambling and problem gambling in aboriginal communities in Ontario. This partnership provided effective oversight and consultation to the researchers and the communities.

The Métis Nation of Ontario also provided additional “training funding” to supplement the community budgets, which allowed the communities to complete their research tasks. This contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

A Regional Research Advisory Committee comprised of representatives from various Ontario community organizations, agencies, and government departments met as a group to provide advice to the aboriginal community representatives. The contribution of talent and time from these individuals helped shape the project.

Finally, credit for the successful completion of this research lies with the five communities themselves. In each community, a local agency stepped forward and agreed to serve as the research project sponsor, and this leadership was crucial to the success that was experienced. The people on each of the five Local Research Advisory Committees met, discussed, and made the research happen in each community. In every community, different individuals stepped forward to help with the research tasks, including writing the local research plans, collecting and interpreting data, and writing the final reports. The many community people who contributed to this research project are identified in each community final report. In the final analysis, this study begins to tell the story of gambling and problem gambling in each of the five aboriginal communities, to the great credit of the dedicated community people who participated.

PROJECT FINAL REPORTS

There are two separate, but related, project final reports that describe the design/methodology and contain the findings and conclusions from the research project entitled, Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in Ontario Aboriginal Communities. Both of these reports are available from the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres (http://www.ofifc.org), the Métis Nation of Ontario (http://www.metisnation.org) and the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre website (http://www.gamblingresearch.org). Readers are encouraged to download and read both of the following two companion reports to gain a complete understanding of this research project.

Phase I – Research

In Phase I of this project, each of the five participating aboriginal communities completed exploratory research into gambling and problem gambling in their populations. Subsequently, each community wrote a final research report describing their experience and findings, and each of these five reports have been compiled into the first compendium research report entitled:

Report 1 – Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in Ontario Aboriginal Communities. Five Community Final Research Reports

Drs. Wynne and McCready, the project co-investigators, then synthesized the findings and conclusions from these five aboriginal community research reports and prepared a second final summary research report entitled:

Report 2 – Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in Ontario Aboriginal Communities. Final Summary Report.

1

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community

Prepared by:

Moosonee Local Research Advisory Committee

Moosonee, Ontario

March 31, 2005

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...... 4

1. INTRODUCTION...... 5

1.1 Background ...... 5

1.2 Participants ...... 5

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION ...... 7

3. RESEARCH ...... 10

3.1 Purpose and Goals ...... 10

3.2 Research Questions...... 10

4. METHODS ...... 11

4.1 Community Survey...... 12

4.2 Focus Groups...... 12

4.3 Key Informant Interviews...... 13

4.4 Case Studies...... 14

5. FINDINGS ...... 14

6. CONCLUSIONS...... 29

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire ...... 33

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide ...... 40

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire...... 41

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework ...... 42

APPENDIX V Case Studies ...... 43

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 3

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 Prevalence of Gambling among Survey Respondents,...... 15

TABLE 2 Gambling Activities ...... 15

TABLE 3 Gambling Frequency ...... 16

TABLE 4 Gambling Duration...... 17

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure Monthly ...... 17

TABLE 6 Gambling Expenditure Most Spent...... 18

TABLE 7 Gender and Marital Status of Gamblers ...... 18

TABLE 8 Education and Income...... 19

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers ...... 19

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type...... 21

TABLE 11 Attributable Behaviours by Gambler Sub-type ...... 21

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type ...... 23

TABLE 13 Gender and Marital Status of “Problem Gamblers” ...... 25

TABLE 14 Education and Income of “Problem Gamblers” ...... 25

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of “Problem Gamblers”...... 26

TABLE 16 Minor Children Living in Residence with “Problem Gamblers” ...... 26

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 4

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to understand gambling within the cultural context in Moosonee and to develop culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies to address this serious health issue in the Aboriginal community of Moosonee. The research methods include a community survey, focus group sessions and key informant interviews.

The expected research outcomes are as follows:

1. An identification of values and attitudes in each community towards gambling;

2. A description of gambling preferences, activities, and pervasiveness in each community;

3. A description of the nature and pervasiveness of problem gambling in each community;

4. An identification of culturally relevant resources and/or strategies communities do/may utilize to mitigate problem gambling; and

5. The development of a strategic action plan to address the issue of problem gambling in the community.

The study found that there is gambling and problem gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal community. There are problems from problem gambling but there is considerable denial of the problems. There are some services to assist problem gamblers but more prevention and treatment services would be useful. In an upcoming action planning phase, an evidence-based action plan will be developed to address and meet the needs of the members of the Moosonee Aboriginal community.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 5

1. INTRODUCTION As indicated by the title, this research project examined gambling and problem gambling in the Aboriginal community in Moosonee. The following subsections provide a description of the Moosonee community and the major participants.

1.1 Background The town of Moosonee is located on the west banks of the Moose River, a short 12 miles from the salt waters of the James Bay.

The first signs of development began with the arrival of the Revillon Freres fur trading company of Paris, France. Since then the Cree began to settle at the trading post, marking the beginning of the Moosonee town site.

The fur traders often referred to the post as “the moose”. The Cree in turn would use Moosoneek meaning “at the moose”. With the arrival of the railway and the hopes of establishing a saltwater port, the name Moosonee was appointed to the community in 1932.

Population Characteristics: The community of Moosonee has a population of approximately 3,000 people.

The following information is provided by Statistics Canada (1996) The Aboriginal population accounts for 82.7% of the total population The population ages 15 and over is 63.9% Persons in the employed labour force (675) Unemployment rate is 13.5% Participation rate is 62.8% Average total income of husband-wife or common-law families is $52,662 Average total income of lone-parent families is $26,954 Persons in service industries (705) Persons in resource based industries (10) Persons in manufacturing and construction industries (30)

Languages: Aboriginal Languages 27.6% French 2.6% English 68.3% Other Languages 1.3% Enter the background section of your research plan

1.2 Participants The overall project was funded by the Ontario Problem Gambling Centre and administered by the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres and the Métis Nation of Ontario. The Moosonee community project was sponsored by the Moosonee Native Friendship Centre and overseen by a Local Research Advisory Committee.

Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres

The Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres (OFIFC) was formed in July 1971. The OFIFC began mainly as a lobbying and resource agent and since has expanded its role to include the design

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 6 and delivery of culturally-based training programs, program development and advocating Aboriginal development and communication. Currently there are 28 member centres that are located throughout the Province of Ontario. The vision of the OFIFC is to improve the quality of life for Aboriginal people by supporting self-determined activities which encourage equal access to and participation in Canadian society and which Aboriginal cultural distinctiveness.

Métis Nation of Ontario

The Métis Nation of Ontario was founded in 1993. It was established as the representative body reflecting the values and inspirations of the Métis of Ontario; the Métis being one of the Aboriginal peoples whose treaty and Aboriginal rights are recognized in Canada’s Constitution.

The MNO founded on a “rights-based” agenda, is specific to Métis people only and based on a long- term vision expressed in our Statement of Prime Purpose. The structure and operations of the MNO are distinct from membership-based organizations modeled on corporations or non-profit associations. The MNO’s objectives are to design and provide programs to registered citizens rather than to simply acquire funding for existing programs. At the community level, the MNO structure is such that there are 26 Community Councils across the province in which are chartered through the MNO and governed in accordance with the MNO’s Charter Agreements. Elections are held at the community level every three years.

Chartered Community Councils obtain funding resources to provide programs and services and to undertake activities according to local priorities. The Métis Nation in Ontario, together with similar representative bodies in western Canada from the Métis National Council, (MNC) which is the governing body of the historic Métis Nation in Canada. The Métis Nation in Ontario is represented at the international level through the MNC, which holds a consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of United Nations.

Local Research Advisory Committee

The local “sponsoring agency” was the Moosonee Native Friendship Centre and it organized a Local Research Advisory Committee (LRAC) to oversee the community project. A composition of the Local Research Advisory Committee is representative of most of the organizations that have a direct interest in problem gambling. The members and their affiliations are as follows.

Victor Mitchell, Executive Director Moosonee Native Friendship Centre

Gloria Sutherland, Community Justice Coordinator Moosonee Native Friendship Centre

Janet Solomon, Gambling Addictions Counsellor North Cochrane Addictions Services

Katie Normand Retired Registered Nurse

Joy Anne Cheechoo, Aboriginal Healing and Wellness Worker Moosonee Native Friendship Centre

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 7

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION

Background/History:

The town of Moosonee is located on the west banks of the Moose River, a short 12 miles from the salt waters of the James Bay.

The first signs of development began with the arrival of the Revillon Freres fur trading company of Paris, France. Since then the Cree began to settle at the trading post, marking the beginning of the Moosonee town site.

The fur traders often referred to the post as “the moose”. The Cree in turn would use Moosoneek meaning “at the moose”. With the arrival of the railway and the hopes of establishing a saltwater port, the name Moosonee was appointed to the community in 1932.

Population Characteristics:

The community of Moosonee has a population of approximately 3,000 people.

The following information is provided by Statistics Canada (1996) The Aboriginal population accounts for 82.7% of the total population The population ages 15 and over is 63.9% Persons in the employed labour force (675) Unemployment rate is 13.5% Participation rate is 62.8% Average total income of husband-wife or common-law families is $52,662 Average total income of lone-parent families is $26,954 Persons in service industries (705) Persons in resource based industries (10) Persons in manufacturing and construction industries (30)

Languages:

Aboriginal Languages 27.6% French 2.6% English 68.3% Other Languages 1.3%

Community Characteristics:

There are various services and businesses that serve the members of the community. Some of the organizations include the following.

Education:

Moosonee District School Area Board Moosonee Public School Bishop Belleau Separate School Board Bishop Belleau Separate School James Bay Lowlands Secondary School Board Northern Lights Secondary School Northern College of Applied Arts and Technology

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 8

Contact North Literacy Centre, Moosonee Native Friendship Centre

Day Care and Nursery:

Day Care, Northern College of Applied Arts and Technology Nursery School, Northern College of Applied Arts and Technology Tikinagan Day Care, Northern College of Applied Arts and Technology

Health Services:

James Bay General Hospital James Bay Community Mental Health Moosonee Health Clinic Porcupine Health Unit Cochrane District Community Care Access Centre Northern Pharmacy

Government Services:

Ministry of Natural Resources Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Correctional Services Keewaytinok Native Legal Services Payukotanyno James and Hudson Bay Family Services James Bay Association for Community Living Family Resource Centre

Aboriginal Organizations:

Sagashtawao Healing Lodge Moosonee Native Friendship Centre Mushkegowuk Métis and Aboriginal Peoples’ Alliance Moosonee Cree Alliance First Nation Aboriginal Head Start Program

Housing:

Moosonee Non-Profit Housing Corporation B and H Electric Ltd., South Porcupine Mocreebec Housing Association Timmins Housing Authority Cochrane District Housing

Retail/Grocery/Gift:

Artic Arts Necessities Northern Stores Tasha’s Variety Le Tempo S & C Variety

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 9

Two Bay Enterprises Ltd. Radio Shack

Distributors:

Meechim Enterprises Keewayton Distributors

Restaurants/Fast Food:

Sky Ranch Restaurant Quick Stop Mark’s Chip Stand Moosonee Take Out

Other Services:

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Moosonee Chamber of Commerce Canada Post Corporation Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Employment Services:

Muskegowuk Council – Employment and Training Services (partnership with Human Resources Development Canada)

Hotels:

Busy Bee Bed and Breakfast Tamarack Suites Osprey Country Inn Polar Bear Lodge Wabun Bed and Breakfast

Appliances Repair:

J.L. Gerard - Maintenance Services Charles A. Weische – Oil Burner and Appliance Repair

Automotive:

Two Bay Enterprises

Oils/Petroleum:

Paytahpun Construction:

Great North Builder’s Supplies Limited M.J. Labelle Co. Ltd. – Cochrane, Ontario Innlink Concrete Limited – Moose Factory, Ontario

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 10

Car Rentals/Transportation:

James Bay Car & Truck Rental – Moosonee Airport Gateway Enterprizes Moosonee Transportation Limited Ontario Northland Railway Canadian Helicopters Limited (Health Services) Helicopter Transport Services Bushland Airways Wabusk Air Air Creebec

Clubs/Associations:

Moosonee Lions Club Moosonee Minor Hockey Association Preventing Unwanted Puppies (PUPS) Moosonee Golf Association

3. RESEARCH This research was descriptive and exploratory and was pursued as a participatory action research project. The research examined the area of gambling and problem gambling in the Aboriginal community of Moosonee. The following subsections provide the purpose statement, research goals and research questions.

3.1 Purpose and Goals The purpose of this research was to understand gambling within the cultural context in Moosonee and to develop culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies to address this serious health issue in the Aboriginal community of Moosonee.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Goal Five: To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research (deferred to a later phase of the project).

3.2 Research Questions This research was designed to address the following research questions:

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio cultural activity.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 11

Question #1 – What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #3 – What types of gambling activities do community members engage in? Question #4 – Where and when do community members gamble? Question #5 – How frequently, and for how long/session, do community members gamble? Question #6 – How much money do community members spend on gambling? Question #7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question #1 – What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question #4 – What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Question #1 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question #2 – How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question #1 – What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 – What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

4. METHODS The research methods that were used for this research include a community survey, focus groups (with a mix of both male and female), key informant interviews and case studies. The research methods are addressed separately below, including a description of the related sample selection, data collection instruments and data analysis.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 12

4.1 Community Survey

Description

In order to understand the extent and nature of gambling and problem gambling among the members of the Moosonee community, a community survey of 200 people was conducted. All of the 200 surveys were contacted door-to door.

The community survey determined if people gamble, the gambling activities, frequency and consequences. By increasing participation in the community survey, there were public awareness campaigns about the study and the importance of contributing to helping Moosonee address gambling problems in the community. There was one community meeting held in May, where which there was no attendance at this information session. Throughout the study there were booths that were set up at the Northern Lights Secondary School and the Northern College where flyers and information was provided.

Sampling

The sampling aimed for gender balance in each of three groups: 100 heads of household, 50 youth and 50 older people. The questionnaire was administered through a door-to-door survey.

Instruments

Two research assistants were hired to administer the 200 questionnaires that were based on the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (see Appendix I).

Analysis

As the surveys were completed, they were entered into a database and later subjected to statistical analysis to produce frequencies and descriptive statistics.

4.2 Focus Groups

Description

Two focus groups were conducted. One was held with the youth and one was held with the Elders. There were three attempts to hold one for the adults no one showed or was willing to participate.

Sampling

The focus group that was held with the youth consisted of four people, two female and two male. There was suppose to be eight all together but four of the other students were absent that morning. The focus group that was held with the Elders consisted of ten people; there were six females and four males.

The youth focus group was held at the Northern Lights Secondary School with assistance from the Cultural Development Youth Worker. The principal was contacted and asked if there could be a focus group held with the students that would participate. There was a time set up after school. No students showed so we spoke with the principal to see if another time can be arranged. The principal agreed to get a mix of females and males from different grades to meet in one of the classrooms the following week. The Elders focus group was held at Moosonee Native Friendship Centre with

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 13 assistance from the Life Long Care Worker. The Life Long Care Program offers a number of services for the Elderly. Elders meet at the centre and have a sharing circle. They bead, sew and have lunch provided for them. During one of these sessions this was when the questions were asked and the Life Long Care Worker translated from Cree to English what the Elders were saying.

Instruments

The focus groups were conducted using discussion guides related to select research questions (see Appendix II).

Analysis

The information that was gathered from the focus groups was used to understand gambling and problem gambling. The results of the focus group discussions were qualitative data and were compiled from the notes and summarized into a summary report. The content of the summary report was analyzed in order to identify the patterns and themes.

4.3 Key Informant Interviews

Description

Key informants, because of their position in the community, have some special knowledge and a unique overview perspective of the community. In order to find out about the problems experienced by problem gamblers, their demographic characteristics and the sources for help, key informants were used to provide special insights. Eight key informants were interviewed.

Sampling

Letters were sent to twelve organizations and follow-up calls were made to each person to see if they were willing and available to participate in the study. Eight key informants were interviewed seven of the interviews took place at the key informants place of work and one was held at the Friendship Centre. One of the research assistants was in attendance at some of the interviews.

Eight key informants were interviewed from the following areas:

Education Gambling Service Ontario Provincial Police Probation Payukotayno Counselling Unit Aboriginal Services Church Representatives Health

Instruments

The key informant interviews were conducted using a set of questions that were related to some of the research questions (see Appendix III).

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 14

Analysis

The key informants’ responses represent qualitative data. The interviews were recorded by note taking; none of the interviews were recorded on tape. The written summaries were analyzed in order to identify the patterns, themes and issues.

4.4 Case Studies

Description

To acquire information from the perspective and experience of real problem gamblers, the research included two problem gambler case study interviews. The case studies were collected through confidential, face-to-face interviews.

Sampling

Problem gambler case studies were developed by recruiting two known, yet self-identified, problem gamblers residing in the community of Moosonee. For their participation, time and assistance, the problem gamblers were provided with a small amount of money.

Instruments

The case studies were prepared following the four-component case study framework (see Appendix IV). The framework covers personal history, gambling history, problem gambling consequences and help-seeking recommendations.

Analysis

The case studies are considered qualitative data and were analyzed for their content, especially for the suggestions on help-seeking preferences. The full written case studies are provided in Appendix V.

5. FINDINGS Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The activities that the youth defined as gambling were bingo, Nevada tickets, scratch tickets, coin toss (the game where you toss coins against the wall) poker, different card games, knock, knock (like bingo but you play with cards) rummoli and betting on stuff (sports, etc.).

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The activities that the Elders defined as gambling were bingo, poker, OKO, euchre, knock, knock, thirty-one, penny bingo, curling (paying to win something big), same with hockey tournaments, scratch tickets and lottery tickets.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 15

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

Community Survey

Although the community survey was conducted with a non-random sample, the “suggested” prevalence rate for gambling in Moosonee was 48.0 percent as shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Prevalence of Gambling among Survey Respondents, N = 200

Non Gamblers Gamblers Gender # Gender # Percentage Male 48 Male 32 16.0% Female 56 Female 64 32.0% Total 104 Total 96 48.0%

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The youth all agreed that there is a lot of gambling that goes on within the community.

Elder Male/Female Group

The Elder focus group participants felt that there are not a lot of penny bingoes; it is their way of socializing and a way to get out. One Elder shared that her objective is to win but if she does not win she sees it as donating and what ever is raised from the bingo is used for a good cause. One made a comment saying “how will the world go around with no gambling’? There will be no money for organizations and businesses.

Key Informant Interviews

Some of the key informants felt that the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community was fairly high, a lot of gambling in Moosonee and up the coast. The key informants suggest that gambling starts off with kids with quarters, playing bingo, oko, poker and euchre.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Table # 2 shows the types of gambling activities community members engage in according to the written survey results. The top four listed activities are bingo, instant win, lottery tickets and raffles.

TABLE 2 Gambling Activities

Gamblers/Game (N = 96) Gambling Activity N % R

Bingo 80 83.3 1

Instant win 31 32.3 2

Lottery 24 25.0 3

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 16

Gamblers/Game (N = 96) Gambling Activity N % R

Raffles 18 18.8 4

Cards 9 9.4 5

Casinos 8 8.3 6

Other gambling (Poker) 6 6.3 7

Sports select 4 4.2 8

Daily lottery 2 2.1 9

Slots 2 2.1 10

Sports pool 2 2.1 11

Sports events 1 1.0 12

Card rooms 1 1.0 13

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Note: There were no tables for this question, and no questions asked in the focus groups or key informant interviews. But it is obvious where gambling takes place in Moosonee. Bingoes are held at the Arena and Lion’s Den and there is also radio and TV Bingoes. Card games are held within private homes. Gambling also takes place in convenience stores/public places.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

Community Survey

As shown in Table 3 below, the vast majority of gamblers gamble once to four times per month.

TABLE 3 Gambling Frequency

Gamblers (N = 96) Gambling Frequency N % R

2-6 times per week 14 14.6 5

Once per week 30 31.2 3

2-3 times per month 35 36.4 1

Once per month 32 33.3 2

6-11 times per year 7 7.3 6

1-5 times per year 27 28.1 4

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 17

From Table 4 below, it is clear that most gamblers spend an hour or less on each gambling occasion.

TABLE 4 Gambling Duration

Gambling Duration (N = 96) 1min- 1.1 – 2.1- 3.1- 4hrs – 1hr % 2 hrs % 3 hrs % 4hrs % Above % Lottery 22 22.9 Daily Lottery 1 1.0 1 1.0 Instant Win 30 31.3 Raffles 17 17.7 Bingo 37 38.5 10 10.413 13.5 6 6.3 14 14.6 Cards 1 1.0 5 5.2 3 3.1 Slots 2 2.1 Sport Select 3 3.1 1 1.0 Sports Pools 2 2.1 Sports Events 1 1.0 Casinos 5 5.2 1 1.0 2 2.1 Card Room 1 1.0 Other Poker

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Community Survey

According to the community survey, the vast majority of Aboriginal gamblers in Moosonee spend less than $100 per month on gambling.

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure Monthly

Gambling Expenditure Monthly Amounts (N = 96) $1- $51- $101- $201- $301- $501- 50 % 100 % 200 % 300 % 500 % Above % Lottery 24 25.0 Daily Lottery 1 1.0 1 1.0 Instant Win 30 31.3 Raffles 15 15.6 Bingo 37 38.5 20 20.8 8 8.3 8 8.3 2 2.1 4 4.2 Cards 5 5.2 2 2.1 1 1.0 Slots 1 1.0 2 2.1 1 1.0 Sports Select 1 1.0 Sports Pools 1 1.0 Sports 1 1.0 Events Casinos 1 1.0 3 3.1 2 2.1 1 1.0 Card Room 1 1.0 Other-Poker 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 18

Table 6 indicates that the largest single expenditure on gambling for most gamblers is less than $100. A small percentage has spent more than $500 in one day.

TABLE 6 Gambling Expenditure Most Spent

Largest Amount Spent in a Day (N = 96) $0 % $1- % $51- % $101- % $201- % $301- % $501- % 50 100 200 300 500 Above Lottery 14 14.6 7 7.3 Daily 1 1.0 1 1.0 Lottery Instant 8 8.3 18 18.8 4 4.2 Win Raffles 15 15.6 Bingo 23 24.0 29 30.2 9 9.4 4 4.2 1 1.0 7 7.3 6 6.3 Cards 5 5.2 3 3.1 Slots 1 1.0 1 1.0 Sports 3 3.1 1 1.0 Select Sports 1 1.0 Pools

Sports 1 1.0 Events Casinos 1 1.0 2 2.1 3 3.1 1 1.0 1 1.0 Card 1 1.0 Rooms Other- 1 1.0 3 3.1 1 1.0 Poker

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey

According to the community survey results reported in Table 7 below, most Aboriginal gamblers in Moosonee are female and are living with a partner.

TABLE 7 Gender and Marital Status of Gamblers

Gamblers Demographic Variables (N = 96) N % Gender Male 32 33.3 Female 64 66.7 No Response Marital Status Single 15 15.6 Married 34 35.4 Common Law 41 42.7

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 19

Gamblers Demographic Variables (N = 96) N % Divorced/Separated 2 2.1 Widowed 2 2.1 No Response 2 2.1

Table 8 suggests that Aboriginal gamblers in Moosonee tend to have had some high school education or more. More than half of the gamblers are from households with annual income of $25,000 or less.

TABLE 8 Education and Income

Demographic Variables Gamblers (N = 96) N % Education Completed Elementary 4 4.2 Some High School 18 18.8 Completed High School 26 27.1 Some College 17 17.7 Completed College 18 18.8 Some Tech School 1 1.0 Completed Tech School 4 4.2 Some University 6 6.3 No Response 2 2.1 Total 96 Annual Household Income 0 - $14,000 22 22.9 $15,000 - $25,000 32 33.3 $25,100 - $40,000 22 22.9 $40,100 - $55,000 7 7.3 $55,100 and above 7 7.3 No Response 6 6.3 Total 96 100.0

More than half of the gamblers are from homes with 1 to 3 minors living in residence and an additional 22.9% have 4 to 5 minors living in residence.

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers

Gamblers (N=96) Demographic Variables N % Number Under 18 Residing No minors 16 16.7 1 -3 minors 54 56.3 4 -5 minors 22 22.9 6 or more 3 3.1 No Response 1 1.0 Total 96 100

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 20

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The youth felt that the gamblers in the community were female and twenty to forty years of age. Other gamblers are Elders and little kids that play the coin toss game.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The Elders were not aware of who gambled but they shared that some Elders do not gamble and some go out and socialize. Some mentioned that some elderly do not know how to play cards, some just stay home or maybe they choose not to gamble and they also mentioned that they stay home when they have no money.

Key Informant Interviews

The key informants indicated that gamblers in the community are adult females, adult males and children. Accordingly, gambling includes almost ever type of person. Some gamblers are employed (the majority), some are middle aged, some are welfare recipients, some live in subsidized housing, some come from one income families, some come from two income families and some are single parents. The non-gamblers people are often members of fundamentalist, religious groups.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

Some of the gambling practices were euchre, cards and checkers. Other games that were played in the past is where you would make a string with bone and try to catch the number of threads. One lady mentioned when she was about twelve years old, her two brothers would get a stick and sharpen both ends and then throw them in the snow banks and they would go right through them.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?”

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The students defined problem gambling as somebody spending money for something else, to go out to gamble. The money you have left over after you pay bills and buy food. Also mentioned was that it becomes a problem when you can not stop and when you borrow money to go out and gamble.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

They defined it as spending all your money on bingo would be a problem and it also becomes a problem when you have no money to go to bingo. All the Elders shared that they only go when they have money.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 21

Community Survey

Whereas the community survey was not conducted with a representative sample, the “suggested” prevalence rate of problem gambling among Aboriginal members of the Moosonee community was 2.1% as shown in Table 10 below.

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers (PGSI=0) (PGSI=1-2) (PGSI=3-7) (PGSI=8+) 75 7 6 2 83.3% 7.8% 6.7% 2.2%

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The youth focus group members felt that there is some problem gambling in Moosonee but not a lot.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

They felt that people who do not have money get enticed to continue and you cannot blame anybody for your problem but yourself.

Key Informant Interviews

Some of the key informants felt that the prevalence of problem gambling in Moosonee was high and others felt that it was low. One key informant indicated that they did not know the community well enough to offer an opinion on the rate of problem gambling but they also mentioned that people do lose a lot of money.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Community Survey

According to the two problem gamblers identified in by the community survey, there are a number of problems attributable to gambling. As shown in Table 11, the problem gamblers reported betting more than they could afford to lose, spending more than they wanted, needing to gamble with larger amounts, trying to win money back, borrowing money and selling things and lying to family and others.

TABLE 11 Attributable Behaviours by Gambler Sub-type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Attributable Behaviours N % N % N % N %

Personal Consequences Bet more than can afford to lose Never 75 100.0 6 85.7 6 100.0

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 22

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Attributable Behaviours N % N % N % N % Sometimes 1 14.3 2 100.0 Most of the time Almost always Spend more than you wanted Never 75 100.0 1 14.3 Sometimes 6 85.7 6 100.0 Most of the time 1 50.0 Almost always 1 50.0 Need to gamble with larger amounts Never 75 100.0 5 71.4 4 66.7 Sometimes 2 28.6 2 33.3 2 100.0 Most of the time Almost always Tried to win money back Never 75 100.0 4 57.1 1 16.7 Sometimes 3 42.9 5 83.3 1 50.0 Most of the time 1 50.0 Almost always Borrow money or sold anything Never 75 100.0 6 85.7 3 50.0 Sometimes 1 14.3 3 50.0 2 100.0 Most of the time Almost always Social Consequences

Lied to family and others Never 75 100.0 5 71.4 5 83.3 1 50.0 Sometimes 2 28.6 1 16.7 1 50.0 Most of the time Almost always

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

Some of the behaviours that were mentioned by the youth focus group members were the loss of respect (other family members/friends not wanting to talk to them because all they may want is money) financial problems and neglect of families/children.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The Elder focus group felt that people will be sad and upset (the ones that do the most gambling are probably sad). Nobody tells you to play with your money, you go yourself and when people go to casinos there is a lot of money that is spent to go out of the community, you have to pay for your fare, hotels and you come back home broke.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 23

Key Informant Interviews

According to the key informants, the behaviours that are attributable to problem gamblers in Moosonee were the neglect and being away from their families, borrowing money and children being out late while their parents are gambling. One key informant felt that it starts as a social then there is drinking which is a whole other problem. Other behaviours that were mentioned were assaults, debt, drug use, stress in relationships/marital conflict, risks, addiction, poor work habits, conflicts in the home if one gambles and the responsibility for families.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Community Survey

The community survey identified adverse consequences for problem gamblers. As shown in Table 12, the adverse consequences included experiencing health problems (stress and anxiety), feeling like they had a gambling problem, feeling like they should stop gambling, being criticized for gambling, feeling guilty about gambling and having personal and household financial problems.

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Adverse Consequences N % N % N % N %

Personal Consequences Health problems (stress and anxiety) Never 75 100.0 7 100.0 6 100.0 1 50.0 Sometimes 1 50.0 Most of the time Almost always Felt had gambling problem Never 75 100.0 7 100.0 4 66.7 Never Sometimes 2 33.3 1 50.0 Most of the time 1 50.0 Almost always Felt like to stop gambling Never 75 100.0 5 71.4 6 100.0 Sometimes 2 28.6 2 100.0 Most of the time Almost always People criticized gambling Never 75 100.0 7 100.0 4 66.7 1 50.0 Sometimes 2 33.3 1 50.0 Most of the time Almost always Felt guilty

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 24

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Adverse Consequences N % N % N % N % Never 75 100.0 6 85.7 6 100.0 Sometimes 1 14.3 Most of the time 1 50.0 Almost always 1 50.0 Social Consequences Financial problems for gambler or household Never 75 100.0 7 100.0 5 83.3 Sometimes 1 16.7 2 100.0 Most of the time Almost always

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

Some of the consequences of problem gambling were that it may lead people into debt with everyone and may lead to attempted suicide if you go so far in debt. Other consequences that were mentioned included people borrowing money all the time, people calling to borrow money and some may start drinking which may lead to other addictions and problems.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The Elders felt that people may starve, children can get taken away, children starve and what is hard to see is the parents playing, not looking after their children and not feeding them which would be a problem.

Key Informant Interviews

The consequences of problem gambling for the individuals, families, friends and others in Moosonee identified by the key informants were marriage break-up, poverty, shame, low self esteem; children also may feel shame and loneliness because parents made gambling prioritized higher than the children are. Others consequences may include neglect of family and friends, laying charges of abandonment, no concept of getting ahead, stress, anger, children/families not having food, shelter and clothing, grandparents providing for the family, financial hardship, health related problems, and possible illegal activities to obtain money for gambling.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey

The community survey findings identified only two problem gamblers. For this research question and the table below, problem gamblers includes “moderate risk gamblers” and “problem gamblers”.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 25

TABLE 13 Gender and Marital Status of “Problem Gamblers”

Demographic Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers Variables (N = 8) N % Gender Male 2 25.0 Female 6 75.0 Marital Status Single 1 12.5 Married 0 0 Common-Law 7 87.5 Divorced/Separated 0 0 Widowed 0 0 No Response 0 0

According to Table 13 the vast majority of the “problem gamblers” were females (75%), living common law (87.5%).

According to Table 14 below, a large portion of the “problem gamblers” was reasonably well-educated with 87.5% having completed high school or more. The “problem gamblers” had varying annual household income. The annual household income was split in quarter portions (25%) in each of four categories: under $15,000, between $15,100 and $25,000, between $25,100 and $40,000 and $40,100 and above.

TABLE 14 Education and Income of “Problem Gamblers”

Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers Demographic (N = 8) Variables N % Education Completed Elementary 0 0 Some High School 1 12.5 Completed High School 1 12.5 Some College 1 12.5 Completed College 4 50.0 Some Tech School 0 0 Completed Tech School 0 0 Some University 1 12.5 No response 0 0 Annual Household Income $0-$15,000 2 25.0 $15,100-$25,000 2 25.0 $25,100-$40,000 2 25.0 $40,100-$55,000 1 12.5 $55,100 and above 1 12.5

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 26

Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers Demographic (N = 8) Variables N % No Response 0 0

The “problem gamblers” were generally employed full-time or part-time (62.5%) but 37.5% were unemployed. Three quarters of the “problem gamblers” (75%) were from professional occupations.

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of “Problem Gamblers”

Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers Demographic (N = 8) Variables N % Employment Status Employed full-time (30 or more 3 37.5 hrs/week) Employed part-time (less than 1 12.5 30hrs/week) Unemployed (out of work but looking 3 37.5 for work) Student: employed part-time or full- 1 12.5 time Student: not employed 0 0 Retired 0 0 Homemaker 0 0 No Response 0 0 Occupation Professional 6 75.0 Retail 0 0 Hospitality 0 0 Labourer 1 12.5 Other 1 12.5

All of the “problem gamblers” were from homes with minors living in residence. The majority (62.5%) had one to three minors in residence and 37.5% had four to five minors in residence.

TABLE 16 Minor Children Living in Residence with “Problem Gamblers”

Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers (N = 8) Demographic N % Variables Number Under 18 Residing No minors 0 0 1 -3 minors 5 62.5 4 -5 minors 3 37.5

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 27

Moderate Risk and Problem Gamblers (N = 8) Demographic N % Variables 6 or more 0 0 No Response 0 0 Total 8 100

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The Elders felt that the problem gamblers dress nice, they look okay but they are starving and they look. Some problem gamblers do not say anything they also mentioned that all levels of people gamble and anybody who has money.

Key Informant Interviews

The key informants indicated that some of the problem gamblers are male and some are female. The key informants suggested that problem gamblers include people that are poor (ones that need money the most).

Question 6: Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

There is a difference from gambling in the past because the Elders shared that they did not have any gambling and they did not play for money. There was no gambling a long time ago, no issues of gambling, it never existed. In 1960 gambling began when the Air Forces came to Moosonee. They did not see gambling until 1960 and what was started was bingo.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Key Informant Interviews

The key informants indicated that there presenters going into the schools to allow community members and problem gamblers to become knowledgeable about problem gambling and to offer promotion and gambling awareness. Ontario Problem Gambling Centre magnets, posters, and these interviews would not be taking place. Everybody is aware of it, kids are playing quarters in front of Northern stores. Others felt that they deny having a problem.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Key Informant Interviews

Key informants noted that there are posters up all over town, advertising campaigns with Mental Health. The police and schools seem to be more concerned with the children gambling, community

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 28 members allow their children to gamble. Some key informants felt that the concern level is not that high and others felt that it was. Also noted was that alcohol, drugs and gambling are three major problems in the community. Churches and the radio are talking about it, but don’t see it as a problem, substance abuse seems more of a problem to be identified. People who do not gamble know what is going on in the community, the ones that are, they do not think about it till afterwards. If problem gambling is not an issue and gambling is considered the norm, awareness and concern is not imperative to the community, being able to define when gambling is considered a problem, even then it depends on the acknowledgement of the individual, family and community that it is a social issue. Over all there is not enough concern to do the necessary changes.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The youth shared that they feel sorry for them. One felt that if you feel sorry for Them, then you will end up giving them money to gamble and another said they would just ignore them, they would not give them any money.

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

The Elders shared that the ones that gamble all the time are probably sad. One also shared that she was sad when she could not play bingo. Some mentioned that people borrow money to go and gamble, and then they get into debt. One also mentioned that she would borrow to go play and they also mentioned that people do not know when to go to sleep, they stay up all night gambling and then it affects their health.

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The youth were aware of the Gambling Counselor at the James Bay Mental Health and they knew of the 1 -800 number for the problem gambling helpline.

Key Informant Interviews

According to the key informants, the resources that presently exist to help problem gamblers includes, the James Bay Mental Health (North Cochrane Addictions Services) where there is a gambling counselor that provides counselling and prevention. There are also other Mental Health counselors that may be of assistance to community members. People can call help lines (Ontario Problem Gambling Centre). Some businesses offer Employee Assistance programs and a key informant noted that there are resources here, but people do not recognize it when it becomes a problem.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Key Informant Interviews

Community members and problem gamblers know that resources are there, although it is difficult to get people to these places. Some felt that being more knowledgeable would result through promotion

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 29 from the North Cochrane Addictions Services, advertising, media, sending packages of information to businesses and notices on community channels.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

The only preference the youth focus group members mentioned was to have a treatment centre for problem gamblers.

Key Informant Interviews

The preferences that were noted by key informants included elementary schools requesting presentations for students due to a gambling problem, a support network, Gamblers Anonymous, family/friends, confidentiality, peer confrontation. Problem gamblers do not want to go to the program, do not want to admit that they have a problem regardless of how many people tell them (their family members). The key informants suggested providing information kits to the public about problem gambling.

Case Studies

The two problem gamblers that provided case studies both indicated that there are few opportunities to socialize without gambling. They suggested more activities and, perhaps, a drop-in centre that provide activities and life skills training. The two problem gamblers indicated that more emphasis should be placed on traditional, native ways. One suggested that outreach counsellors, not addiction counsellors, could be useful in assisting problem gamblers help themselves.

6. CONCLUSIONS Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

In conclusion, gambling was defined as betting on something, for example, sports and playing for something that involves large amounts of money, for example, curling, and hockey/broomball tournaments.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

In conclusion, the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal community was high. Although the community survey provided a “suggested” gambling prevalence rate from the community survey was low (ninety-six people out of two hundred people indicated that they gamble), a number of the focus group members and key informants indicated the “perceived” prevalence was high.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

In conclusion, the types of gambling activities that community members engaged in were bingo/penny bingo, instant win, lottery, raffles, different card games, poker, sports select, daily lottery, sports pools, sports events, Nevada tickets, scratch tickets, coin toss, knock, knock, rummoli, OKO, euchre, thirty

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 30 one and curling/hockey tournaments. When community members go out of town some engage in activities such as casinos, slots and card rooms.

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

In conclusion, members of the community gamble at the community arena in Moosonee and Moose Factory and there are penny bingo’s that are held at the Lion’s Den in Moosonee. Gambling is also held in private homes and convenience stores/public places. Bingos at the arena are held at least four to three times a week. T.V. bingo is held two times a week and radio bingo is also held two times a week.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

In conclusion, fourteen people gamble two to six times per week, thirty people gamble once per week, thirty five people gamble two to three times per month, thirty two people gamble once per month, seven people gamble six to eleven times a year and twenty seven people gamble one to five times a year. The amount of time which the gambler spends on gambling can range from one minute to fourteen thousand and four hundred minutes.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

In conclusion, the amount of money that is spent on gambling within the community of Moosonee ranges from the lowest being one dollar to the highest being four thousand, eight hundred per month. For the amount that is spent in a day is the lowest being zero and the highest being four thousand, eight hundred.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

In conclusion, there were thirty-two males and sixty-four females that gambled. Therefore, more females gamble within the community. Some were single, some were married, some were living common law and some were divorced/separated and widowed. Their level of education varies, their income ranges from zero to fifty-five thousand or more and there are no minors in some homes and there are over six in others.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

In conclusion, some of the gambling practices that were practiced within the community have been abandoned and there are some that are still played today. Also, there is a number of gambling activities that were developed over the years.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?”

In conclusion, “problem gambling” is defined as having a problem when you cannot stop and keep continuing to gamble by borrowing money.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 31

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

In conclusion, the “suggested” problem gambling prevalence rate from the community survey is relatively low, there were seventy-five Non Problem Gamblers, seven Low Risk Gamblers, six Moderate Risk Gamblers and two Problem Gamblers. The “perceived” rate of problem gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal community is relatively low.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

In conclusion, the behaviours that are attributable to problem gamblers in the community are being away from their families, borrowing money, taking risks and feeling upset at times.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

In conclusion, the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community is the neglect of children, family members, friends and also problems with gambling that may lead to other addictions.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

In conclusion, there are thirty-one males and fifty-nine females who are gamblers in the community, and there are more female problem gamblers within the community. Some are single, married, living common-law, divorced or separated and widowed. Their education level varies, along with the range of income from fifteen to fifty five thousand or more. Most of the gamblers are employed full time and there are five different occupations that fall under professional, retail, hospitality, labourer and other.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

In conclusion, gambling does differ because there was no gambling in the past; people played for fun and when gambling began it was started by the Air Forces that came to Moosonee.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

In conclusion, community members and problem gamblers know about problem gambling within the community, everybody knows and people in the community deny that the problem exists.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

In conclusion, community members are aware of the presence of gambling in the community; Mental Health offers awareness and advertising campaigns within the community; and posters are up all over town. Some felt that there was a high level of concern while others did not. Police and schools were concerned with the youth gambling.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 32

In conclusion, community members feel sorry for them and others do not and gambling also affects people’s lifestyle.

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

In conclusion, the resource that presently exists to help members in the community is the James Bay Mental Health (North Cochrane Addictions Services) where they offer counselling and prevention. There are also help lines and Employee Assistance Programs that are offered through some businesses.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

In conclusion, community members and problem gamblers know that there are resources that exist, although they may not want to seek help because they do not see it as a problem.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

In conclusion, the preferences for programs and services to assist problem gamblers would be for everyone to work together to build a support network that would benefit the community as a whole. Presentations relating to problem gambling and how it can be prevented and a treatment centre were also suggested. There needs to be more social activities, a drop-in centre and more emphasis on traditional native ways.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 33

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire

CANADIAN PROBLEM GAMBLING INDEX:

Abbreviated for the Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in Ontario Aboriginal Communities Project

Demographic Questions:

Male___ Female___

What is your aboriginal ancestry? ______

What is your community of residence? ______

What is your current marital status?

1. Single (never married) 2. Married 3. Common-law 4. Divorced or separated 5. Widowed 6. No response

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

1. No schooling 2. Some elementary school 3. Completed elementary school 4. Some high school/junior high 5. Completed high school 6. Some community college 7. Some technical school 8. Completed community college (certificate, diploma) 9. Completed technical school (certificate, diploma) 10. Some University 11. Completed Bachelor’s Degree 12. Completed Master’s Degree 13. Completed Doctoral Degree 14. Professional Degree 15. Don’t know 16. No response

What is your present job status?

1. Employed full-time (30 or more hours/week) 2. Employed part-time (less than 30 hours/week)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 34

3. Unemployed (out of work but looking for work) 4. Student – Employed part-time or full-time 5. Student – Not employed 6. Retired 7. Homemaker 8. Don’t know 9. No response

What type of work do you currently do (or, what do you do when you are employed)?

______

How many people under the age of 18 live with you?______

What is your total household income, before taxes, last year?

‰ 5,000 – 15,000 ‰ 15,000 – 25,000 ‰ 25,000 – 40,000 ‰ 40,000 – 55,000 ‰ 55,000 +

Abbreviated Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) Questions:

1-5 Thinking about the past 12 months, please check (in column 2 for Q1) all the gambling activities in column one that you have engaged in. If you did not check any activities, you are finished and please turn in your questionnaire. If you checked any of the activities, please complete the other four columns for each activity you participated in by using the legend on the next page.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Activities How Often #Minutes $ Spend Largest $ Gambling Activities (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend)

Gambling tickets 1. Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2. Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3. Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4. Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5. Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6. Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7. Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8. Casino slot machines 9. Arcade or video games for money 10. Gambling on the Internet

Sports betting

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 35

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Activities How Often #Minutes $ Spend Largest $ Gambling Activities (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) 11. Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12. Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity- sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13. Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14. Sports with a bookie

Horse racing 15. Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

Casinos 16. Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17. Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Speculative investments 18. Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs)

Other gambling 19. Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20. Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21. Any other form of gambling (______specify)

LEGEND

Question Response Q1. Have you bet or spent money on this activity? Check all that apply Q2. How often did you bet or spend money on this 1. Daily activity? 2. 2-6 times/week 3. About once/week 4. 2-3 times/month 5. About once/month 6. 6-11 times/year 7. 1-5 times/year 8. Never in the past year 9. Don’t know 10. No response Q3. How many minutes/hours do you normally spend on this activity each time you play? Total number of minutes Q4. How much money, not including winnings, did you spend on this activity in a typical month? Total number of dollars Q5. What is the largest amount of money you have spent on this activity in any one day? Total number of dollars

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 36

6. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

7. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet or spent more money than you wanted to on gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

8. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you needed to gamble with larger amounts of money to get the same feeling of excitement?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

9. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you gone back another day to try to win back the money you lost?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

10. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

11. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 37

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

12. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

13. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt like you would like to stop betting money or gambling, but didn’t think you could?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

14. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have people criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether or not you thought it was true?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

15. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

16. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has gambling caused you any health problems, including stress or anxiety?

1. Never 2. Sometimes

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 38

3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

17. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has your gambling caused any financial problems for you or your household?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

18. Do you or someone in your household gamble at work?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

If yes, how do you gamble?

1. Raffles 2. Scratch Tickets 3. Hockey Pool 4. 50/50 Draws 5. Internet

19. Has anyone in your family EVER had a gambling problem?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know 4. No response

20. Has anyone in your family EVER had an alcohol or drug problem?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know 4. No response

21. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, have you or someone in your household used alcohol or drugs while gambling?

1. Yes 2. No

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 39

3. Don’t know 4. No response

22. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, have you felt you might have an alcohol or drug problem?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know 4. No response

23. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, if something painful happened in your life did you have an urge to gamble?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know 4. No response

24. Thinking about the past, have you ever considered committing suicide as a result of your gambling?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t know 4. No response

You have reached the end of the Moosonee community survey. Thank you for your time and participation in this most important research project.

In the future we may conduct gambling research that is a follow-up to this study and to do this we may wish to speak to some people again. If you would like to be a part of any future gambling research that affects your community, please provide your name and telephone number below. Again any information you provide would be kept strictly confidential.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 40

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide

Elder Male/Female Focus Group

1. What activities do you define as gambling?

2. What do you think the level of gambling is in the community?

3. Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

4. What do you define as problem gambling?

5. What do you think the level of problem gambling is in the community?

6. What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, others) in the community?

7. What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

8. Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

9. What are your attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

10. What gambling practices from your background, traditions, and customs have been (continued/abandoned) by community members?

11. Does problem gambling differ in your town differ from problem gambling in the past?

Youth Male/Female Focus Group

1. What activities do you define as gambling?

2. What do you think the level of gambling is in Moosonee?

3. Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

4. What do you define as problem gambling?

5. What do you think the level of problem gambling is in Moosonee?

6. What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

7. What are your attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

8. Do you have any preferences for programs and services to assist problem gamblers in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 41

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire

What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, others) in the community?

Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

What do you think the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

At the end of each interview I asked each one if they would like to add anything.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 42

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework

1. Case history (life story, personal history and background)

2. Gambling history (beginnings and developments)

3. Problem gambling description (behaviours, rewards and consequences)

4. Help-seeking recommendations (this is not an attempt to convince the problem gambler to go for help but a search for the types of services, programs and help that problem gamblers would use to get help)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 43

APPENDIX V Case Studies

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Community of Moosonee

Case Study No. 1

This person was born at a wilderness camp. He attended Residential School. He attended high school for the first half of the semester and begun abusing alcohol and never returned.

His working career began at a retail store. When the owner retired, he purchased it. Later he worked in management positions. He also worked other jobs and at the present time he is employed.

He grew up in a remote community where there was no highway access and no regular air schedule, maybe there was air service once a month when A grew up.

Regular activities were going to church on Sundays or week days, special occasions like carnivals (where you would win prizes). Carnivals and activities had set prizes where young people competed. That is how they were trained to start gambling from being bored. You wanted to win all the time (merchandise bingoes). The prizes were good, you could select your own but, there was also a jack pot prize at the end. This is done to take grade students (that is how he realized it was gambling).

People in the community played games like checkers, chess, pool and there were prizes to win. He would see the Elders playing. First it was for fun then money was involved which became a norm to gamble.

He started gambling by tossing coins because he had seen elders and mid life people, then he would look at them and model them. Youth were doing that, it showed him it was a norm in the community. Then he started seeing poker games with nine players, OKO, bingo card games (you would bet on it). Then it escalated to other activities/events where there are always prizes involved and now competition and that is how it triggers.

He has been in residential school; he was sexually, physically and mentally abused. For a remedy he started to sniff glue and gas. He used these substances as a remedy that triggered the bad experiences from residential school. When he became of age he started to drink as a remedy from flash backs. He quit sniffing, then starting drinking. When he got married, he quit drinking cold turkey, and he does not drink anymore.

Other remedies that he used was to eat food, then he gained weight, started to smoke, that’s how he lost weight, then got into gambling. The game he likes is straight poker and he is still gambling at the present time. He gambles to forget, because of family problems of gambling, and he also gambles to forget triggers and flash back experiences from Residential School.

He expressed that gambling was fun; it helps him forget his problems and his experiences. In the community where he is now, everywhere you turn now there is gambling. There is a lack of social activities for the gamblers to go to. There is also pressure from DeBeers.

He has seen people quit but, what they do is join churches to stay away from gambling. Some people are still looking for help but, they are looking for social activities that do not involve money. For example there maybe a co-ed night to go out and play games with no prizes, bingoes and cards but with no prizes and money involved.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 44

Another solution is to have a Drop In Centre where there is activities such as; painting, carving, pottery, and making stuff with moose hide. There are many activities that do not involve money. There could be money for the materials and also there could also be nutritional cooking workshops, money/time management, self awareness, sewing classes, fixing/repairing, target shooting in the summer, aubry? (bow and arrows).

He stressed that organizations have to be involved to encourage people to do this, to teach people the norms of living, to teach people traditions, native beliefs, native values. Other organizations such as Payukotayno and James Bay Mental Health may do other work shops because there is no place to go. All organizations have to all come together, a network of organizations coming together. Gambling, alcohol and drugs and how to minimize it right now is the max. An easy way to make money is to have a wet dance and a bingo, people contribute.

He mentioned that here in Moosonee, there is too many activities that involves competition and some people that want to quit drinking or gambling go to church. Some that drink also goes to poker and people that gamble go to church. There is no place to meet and socialize. People do not visit anymore unless there is a party that involves alcohol. A sharing circle is poker.

Some men and women do not want to go to circles because there is a fear that they would be laughed at and they feel ashamed of themselves to express issues that they have because there might have been betrayals from parents, friends, family because when they share it, it becomes a laughing stock. For example, Residential School, people are afraid to share their issues and feel ashamed to express them.

Examining Gambling and Problem in the Community of Moosonee

Case Study No. 2

This person grew up in a small community. She left for school for three years and attended university for one year. She has children.

She was raised by her grandmother. Her grandmother always played bingo. Her grandmother did not play lottery tickets, poker, just bingo. She would go to bingo with her grandmother when she was a kid, she would sit there with one card. Gambling, going to bingoes, she never cared if she won or not. It was a time to socialize and spend time with her grandmother.

As she kept going to bingo, bills came in, her kids grew. Now she was going there to try and win, she had a desire to win. For ten years she went to bingoes with an average of three times a week. She then went into debt. She knows now that back then she blamed it on other reasons except herself.

It has six years that she went cold turkey. She did go back and was disgusted with it. One bad habit became another. She met a friend who taught her card games, started teaching her and she still plays today. She plays twice a week and also has a bad habit of drinking. At times she would rather go to a dance than to poker. Most of the time she does not win, but it is something she likes doing. She goes to casinos once or twice a year. She associates gambling to being with friends. She does not play Nevada’s or scratch tickets and she rarely plays 649 (may be three/four times a year).

She got into poker through a friend and bingo she went with her grandmother, and then started going alone. She went with her grandmother to keep an eye on her because she was old, she would go and visit. That was her grandmother’s only passion. She stopped going when her granny got sick, she found it to be boring, but she still plays radio bingo every Saturday.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 45

Right now she is here for employment but, if she was in a city she would probably start up at bingoes and casinos. Now that she is getting older she is spending more time with her grandchildren and right now she does not see it as a problem. If she loses money she does not dwell on it, she will go again if nothing is planned. She punishes herself; she does not blame it on other people. But she mentioned that it would be different if she had smaller kids. She sees a young mother being more addictive. When she goes she does not think that she will win and get her money back. If she wins, she takes her family/friends out for breakfast, or takes her grandchildren out, gives them money. She does not gamble to better her life, generally gives it away.

She does get annoyed. Nobody criticizes her about her gambling expect one of her family members, the others do not. She mentioned before her mother passed away, her mother use to tell her not to spend too much money playing poker, she would say to her I know.

She feels that the James Bay Mental Health is good to have but should not call them addiction counsellors, they are just counsellors. She feels you start to pin point and others get offended. She would not go see an addiction counsellor and she also feels that only the person with the problem can help themselves. She prefers to call them outreach workers because they are reaching out to the community. If people have problems, gamblers know where to go for help.

Any type of an addiction to her is a social issue. People know where they can go, just like an alcoholic. They can gamble and gamble or stop or go down hill. It would be good to have someone to talk to and to have a Drop In Centre.

Last she shared that it is not good to pin point, it gets her mad when they do that. You win you win you don’t you don’t. She does not see it as a problem right now, sees it with others though but she cannot judge them and they know where to go for help.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Moosonee Aboriginal Community 46

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community

Prepared by:

Regional Municipality of Niagara Local Research Advisory Committee

Niagara Region, Ontario

March 31, 2005

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...... 49

1. INTRODUCTION...... 50

1.1 Background ...... 50

1.2 Participants ...... 50

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION ...... 50

3. RESEARCH ...... 51

3.1 Purpose and Goals ...... 52

3.2 Research Questions...... 52

3.3 Methods ...... 53

3.3.1 Community Survey ...... 53

3.3.2 Focus Groups...... 54

3.3.3 Key Informant Interviews...... 54

3.3.4 Case Study Interviews...... 54

4. FINDINGS ...... 55

5. CONCLUSIONS...... 67

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire ...... 71

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide ...... 79

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire...... 80

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework ...... 81

APPENDIX V Case Studies ...... 82

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 48

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 ”Suggested” Prevalence of Gambling Activities ...... 55

TABLE 2 Gambling Activity...... 56

TABLE 3 Gambling Frequency ...... 57

TABLE 4 Gambling Duration...... 58

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure ...... 58

TABLE 6 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Gamblers...... 59

TABLE 7 Education and Income...... 60

TABLE 8 Aboriginal Ancestry...... 60

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers ...... 61

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type...... 61

TABLE 11 Attributable Behaviours by Gambler sub-type ...... 62

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type ...... 63

TABLE 13 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Problem Gamblers ...... 64

TABLE 14 Education and Income of Problem Gamblers...... 64

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of Problem Gamblers ...... 65

TABLE 16 Aboriginal Ancestry of Problem Gamblers...... 66

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 49

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to gain an understanding of gambling in an Aboriginal context and to examine and address the issue of gambling in the Aboriginal community in the Niagara Region. This research was exploratory and descriptive in nature, so that we would be better able to understand gambling in an Aboriginal cultural context.

In the Niagara Region, focus was comprised of four main local communities: Welland, Fort Erie, Niagara Falls/Niagara-on-the-Lake and St. Catharines. Our research contained descriptive baseline data as to the nature and characteristics of gambling and problem gambling. The research methods included surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews and case studies. We surveyed 203 Aboriginal people who were 18 years of age and over. We held six focus groups. We also held 16 key informant interviews to further gather information and to help find six problem gamblers for our case studies.

The outcome of the gathered data ultimately helped to raise some peoples’ awareness about gambling issues in our community. The collected data will also help to design a culturally appropriate intervention that will mitigate problem gambling and to conduct further research by building on the information we have gathered. The findings describe gambling and problem gambling and this information may be used to advise future community wide problem gambling interventions.

The research outcome included the identification of values and attitudes of our community members towards gambling. It includes a description of gambling preferences, activities and the pervasiveness of gambling in our community. It provides a description of the nature and pervasiveness of problem gambling in our community. It provides an identification of culturally relevant resources and strategies and those needed in our community that may help to mitigate problem gambling. Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community is defined as an activity where you spend money in hopes of gaining more money through activities such as lottery tickets, scratch tickets, horse racing, slot machines and bingo to name a few. The overall prevalence of gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal community is high at 92%.

The Aboriginal gambler in the Niagara Region is a female, age 26 to 55 years old with a low to middle annual income. The Aboriginal problem gambler as described from the survey results, are both males and females aged 26 to 55 years old, married with low to middle income ranges.

Finally, this research assessed the effectiveness of the participatory action research methodology by engaging our Aboriginal community in examining gambling related issues and mounting appropriate responses.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 50

1. INTRODUCTION This Aboriginal gambling research project was jointly sponsor by the MNO and the OFIFC. The data collected throughout the Niagara Region was acquired by contacting the various Aboriginal groups and their citizens of the area. First Nations and Métis were both included in the research data. As well, local agencies and professional people were consulted and interviewed.

1.1 Background Métis Nation of Ontario The MNO was founded in 1993. It was established as the representative body reflecting the values and inspirations of the Métis of Ontario; the Métis being one of the Aboriginal peoples whose treaty and Aboriginal rights are recognized in Canada’s Constitution. The MNO was founded on a “rights- based” agenda, is specific to Métis only and based on a long-term vision expressed in our Statement of Prime Purpose. The structure and operations of the MNO are distinct from membership-based organizations modeled on corporations or non-profit associations. The MNO’s objectives are to design and provide programs to registered citizens rather than to simply acquire funding for existing programs. At the community level the MNO structure is such that there are 27 Community Councils across the Province which are chartered through the MNO and governed in accordance with the MNO’s Charter Agreements. The Métis Nation of Ontario, Welland Council, established its’ office in Welland in 1997.

Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centers The OFIFC was formed in July 1971. The OFIFC began mainly as a lobbying and resource agent and since has expanded its role to include the design and delivery of culturally-based training programs, program development and advocating Aboriginal development and communication. Currently, there are 28 member Centers that are located throughout the Province of Ontario. The vision of the OFIFC is to improve the quality of life for Urban Aboriginal people by supporting self-determined activities which encourage equal access and participation in Canadian society and which respect Aboriginal cultural distinctiveness. 1.2 Participants Aboriginal people from the Métis Nation of Ontario and the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres are partnering to host this gambling research project. A “Local Research Advisory Committee” was formed by local citizens to develop a local research plan and serve as a resource to provide guidance throughout the research project. We surveyed Aboriginal people using the CPGI; we also held key informant interviews, focus groups and conducted case studies. Elders and other esteemed community members from the local Aboriginal centres and aforementioned organizations greatly assisted us as well.

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION As a community, the Niagara Region has a population of approximately 450,000 people. It has an Aboriginal population of approximately 47,400 persons. The median age of the Aboriginals in the Niagara area is 29.6*. The employment rate for Aboriginals in this area is 60.3%, with 6.1% of the Aboriginal population, 25 years or older, having a University education at a bachelor’s degree or higher* (*Statistics Canada). The Niagara Region is largely an industrial area with the Welland Ship Canal transporting cargo manufactured throughout the Great Lakes and the world through the heart of our community. Additionally, our area is also known for its agricultural base where tender fruit, vegetables and grains are grown in abundance. We also have a thriving horse racing industry both thoroughbred and standard bred.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 51

The area is also largely known throughout the world as a tourist attraction having the Horseshoe Falls and many museums in Niagara Falls, Ontario as well as holding many annual festivals and fairs throughout the area. Festivals include the Grape and Wine Festival, Canal Days and an annual Jazz Festival.

We have many schools in our area, which are highly diversified and include public, private, French, and those with affiliations to religion. We have a community college, Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technologies, having campuses in the major population centres and, in St. Catharines, we have Brock University.

We are located on the Niagara Peninsula that is surrounded by water on three sides, namely: Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the Niagara River. We have access to parks and waterways including the Welland, Chippawa and Grand Rivers.

The historical town of Niagara-on-the-Lake boasts many tourist attractions. There is the Shaw Festival Theatre and Fort George. The War of 1812 was fought in the Niagara Region and there are many sites commemorating famous battles including Brock’s Monument. The Niagara Region Native Centre is located in Niagara-on-the-Lake in close proximity to Thorold, St. Catharines and Niagara Falls. Located directly across the Niagara River from the town proper is Lewiston, New York and Fort Niagara.

Niagara Falls is the “Honeymoon Capital of the World” and is very famous for the Horseshoe Falls and the Niagara River that it is named after. Niagara Falls is also home to the Sir Adam Beck Generating Station that is powered by the Niagara River and supplies power to Ontario, Quebec and the United States of America. Niagara Falls is also home to two Casinos. Located directly across the Niagara River is Niagara Falls, New York.

The town of Fort Erie also has its historical properties and was the site of various battles during the war of 1812. Historical Fort Erie is located on the bank of the mouth of the Niagara River. That town is home to the Fort Erie Race Track where thoroughbreds race. The track also includes a casino with approximately 1,200 slot machines. There are numerous bingo halls. The town is also home to the Aboriginal Fort Erie Friendship Centre. The town’s annual Festival, the ‘Fort Erie Friendship Festival,’ is held over the long weekend in July (Canada Day, July 1st and Independence Day, July 4th). It is held in co-operation with the Americans and boasts live music and various activities. Located directly across the Niagara River is Buffalo, New York.

Welland is famous for its recreational waterways, its rowing club and competitions, its roses and its annual ‘Welland Rose Festival’ that is held in June of each year. June is also a month long festival which embraces the multiculturalism of the area. It culminates with a parade that basically shuts down the City. Everyone comes out for it. Afterwards, there is a ‘party’ on Merrit Island that continues the multiculturalism theme and goodwill of the City. The month of September is for the annual food festival where different cuisines can be tasted. The main courthouse for the Judicial District of Niagara South is located in Welland. Welland is home to the Métis Nation of Ontario Welland Council.

St. Catharines has its ‘Grape and Wine Festival.’ The city and surrounding area are renowned for their grapes and the number of wineries in the area. St.Catharines is located on the southerly shore of Lake Ontario.

3. RESEARCH The research was exploratory and descriptive in nature and it was conducted in a fashion consistent with the participatory action research (PAR) methodological approach. The following subsections provide the purpose statement, research goals and research questions.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 52

3.1 Purpose and Goals The purpose of this research is to understand gambling in an Aboriginal cultural context and to examine and address the issue of problem gambling in the Aboriginal community in the Niagara Region.

There were five major research goals as follows:

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio- cultural activity.

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Goal Five: To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research (deferred to a later phase of the project).

3.2 Research Questions The research was designed to address a number of important research questions. The questions are listed below in relation to the first four goals. The fifth goal, the action planning goal, will be pursued in a separate action planning, phase based on the “answers” or findings to the research questions.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1 - What activities do community members define as gambling? Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of gambling in the community? Question 3 - What types of gambling do community members engage in? Question 4 - Where and when do community members gamble? Question 5 - How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble? Question 6 - How much money do community members spend on gambling? Question 7 - Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question 8 - What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been continued/abandoned by community members in each town or city?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1 - What do community members define as ‘’problem gambling’’? Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question 3 - What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question 4 - What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 53

Question 5 - Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question 6 - Does problem gambling in differ from the problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question 1 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question 2 - How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question 3 - What are the community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question 1 - What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question 2 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about the resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question 3 - What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers? 3.3 Methods The research methods consisted of a community survey, focus group sessions, key informant interviews and problem gambler case studies. Each method is described below and includes references to sampling, data collection and data analysis.

3.3.1 Community Survey With the aim of describing the extent and nature of gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal people in Niagara Region, we conducted a community survey. A community survey was conducted to obtain information on how community members are involved in gambling, how much they participate in gambling and their experience with gambling.

Sampling We used a broad, representative sample of 203 Aboriginal people in the urban Aboriginal communities of the Niagara Region; approximately 50 respondents from each of the four communities: Welland, Fort Erie, Niagara Falls/Niagara-on-the-Lake and St. Catharines. Within the sample of convenience, attempts were made to have a balance between males and females and reasonable representation of different age groups such as young people, adults and older people.

Instruments Data collection consisted of encouraging Aboriginal people to complete a pencil and paper questionnaire done in public places. The questionnaire was comprised of demographical questions and the first 17 questions of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (see Appendix I).

Analysis The questionnaire produced quantitative data that lent itself to statistical analysis. The data from the questionnaires was coded and entered into a database. The database was analyzed with the aim of developing descriptive statistics on the extent and nature of gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal people in the Niagara Region. The results of the analysis are considered to represent answers to the research questions and be part of the research findings.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 54

3.3.2 Focus Groups We used focus groups to gather information on the perceptions, attitudes and values of the members of the community in relation to gambling and problem gambling.

Sampling The focus group participants were recruited from each of the four focus communities in Niagara Region: Welland, Fort Erie, Niagara Falls/Niagara-on-the-Lake and St. Catharines. From each of these four communities, there were two to three people selected for each focus group. There were a total of six focus groups with three different age categories for male and female. The age groups were: youth (ages 18 to 25), adults (ages 26 to 55) and Elders (age 56 and older). Each focus group consisted of 8 - 12 Aboriginal people, along with a facilitator.

Instruments Each focus group was led by a facilitator and each group had a recorder. The facilitator used a discussion guide (see Appendix II) and the recorder took notes. With the permission of the participants, the sessions were tape-recorded. The group responses to the discussion guide questions and topics formed the data that were collected as notes and tape recordings.

Analysis The data or results of the focus group sessions represent qualitative data which was subjected to content analysis. The content analysis consisted of reviewing the notes and tapes and compiling the group responses, themes and issues. The results of the content analysis are reported as the findings.

3.3.3 Key Informant Interviews To obtain the perceptions and opinions of people who have an overview of the Aboriginal community in Niagara Region, there were 16 key informant interviews conducted. The key informant interviews were conducted with very knowledgeable and available people.

Sampling The key informants were people who knew about the Aboriginal community in their respective communities in Niagara Region. From the four focus communities, four knowledgeable people were interviewed: an Elder and a key person from a health agency, a social service agency and an addiction services agency.

Instruments Data collection was done by recording the responses to a set of open-ended questions for key informants (see Appendix III). The responses were recorded by taking notes during the interview and tape-recording with the permission of the key informant.

Analysis The key informants’ responses represent qualitative data that were analyzed for its content. The notes and tapes were reviewed and summarized in order to identify the themes, patterns and issues.

3.3.4 Case Study Interviews In order to obtain the experiences, views and opinions of problem gamblers, we obtained 8 case studies from problem gamblers: two problem gamblers from each of our four focus communities. The data for the case studies were in the form of the anonymous, voluntary problem gamblers, telling their story through a problem gambler case study.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 55

Sampling We encouraged the involvement of two problem gamblers from each community with an overall balance of gender and age groups for the 8 case studies we had in mind. Problem gamblers were identified by survey respondents, focus group participants, key informants and other contacts. We attempted to recruit two problem gamblers from each of the four respective communities. We were able to locate 6 problem gamblers for our case studies. For all six case studies, the problem gambler agreed to participate as the problem gambler

Instruments All participants were promised absolute assurance of confidentiality and anonymity. The interviews were guided by using the four-component framework that is provided in Appendix IV. We used questions and prompts to get the participants to tell their own story in their own way and in their own words. They were comfortable interviews, with the participants’ needs upper most. Subject to gaining the approval of the interviewee, the interviewer took notes and the interview was taped. The notes and tapes were then transcribed as brief written case studies for inclusion in this findings report (see Appendix V).

Analysis The case studies represent qualitative data that were analyzed for their content and incorporated into the findings. For their interest value, the eight case studies are also provided as full case studies in this report (see Appendix V).

4. FINDINGS The findings are presented as a summary of the research data that were collected. All the collected data were obtained by using one or more of the research methods as described in the methods section. The findings are organized by the goal areas and the respective research questions that were developed and identified within the research plan.

Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Focus Groups The community members considered the following legal activities as gambling: casinos, bingo halls, slot machines, horse racing, card games, video games, purchase of lottery tickets, scratch tickets, pull tickets, sports betting and raffles to name a few.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community? Community Survey

Although the community survey did not have a representative random sample, Table #1 shows the results from the survey and the “suggested” prevalence of gambling in the community. Based on the responses from the community survey, over 92% of Aboriginal people gamble.

TABLE 1 ”Suggested” Prevalence of Gambling Activities

Gamblers Non-Gamblers Total Demographics N % N % N % Total Respondents 188 92.6 15 7.4 203 100%

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 56

Focus Groups The focus groups suggested that pretty much everyone gambles in one form or another. They felt there is more gambling in the community due to all the various forms of gambling that are available. “It is so prevalent that has become habit forming for our whole community”

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Community Survey Table #2 shows the types of gambling activities community members engage in according to the community survey results. The top four listed activities are lottery tickets, scratch tickets, bingo, raffles and fundraisers.

TABLE 2 Gambling Activity

Gamblers/Game (N=191)

Gambling Activity N % R

Lottery tickets 139 72.8 1

Instant win or scratch tickets 102 53.4 2

Bingo 94 49.2 3

Raffles or fund raising tickets 93 48.7 4

Coin slots in a casino 71 37.2 5 Card/board games with family or 61 22.6 6 friends Horse races (live or off-track) 38 19.9 7 Casino games other than coin slots 23 12.0 8 (poker, blackjack, roulette, Keno) Daily lottery 23 12.0 9

Sport Select 21 11.0 10

Sports pools 17 8.9 11

Stocks, options, commodities 16 8.4 12

VLTs in a bar or lounge 16 8.4 13 Games of skill (pool, golf, bowling, 14 7.3 14 darts) Games at Casio’s outside of 14 7.3 15 province i.e. - Las Vegas Outcome of sporting events 11 5.8 16 Card games in non-regulated 9 4.7 17 settings Internet gambling 6 3.1 18

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 57

Gamblers/Game (N=191)

Gambling Activity N % R

Arcade or Video games for money 4 2.1 19

Sports with a bookie 4 2.1 20

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Focus Groups The focus groups suggested that gambling took place nearly anywhere: at bingo halls, corner stores, family homes, through a bookie and at casino’s. The focus groups indicated that gambling took place at all times of the day and night.

Question 5: How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

Community Survey Table #3 addresses how frequently community members gamble. The highest percentage of gamblers, gamble at least once per week.

TABLE 3 Gambling Frequency

Gamblers (N=191)

Gambling Frequency N %

Daily 9 4.7

2-6 times per week 31 16.2

Once per week 36 18.8

2-3 times per month 33 17.3

Once per month 19 9.9

6-11 times per year 11 5.8

1-5 times per year 34 17.8

Never in the past year 1 .5

Don’t know 4 2.1

No response 11 5.8

Missing 2 1.0

Total 191 99.9

Table #4 indicates the duration or amount of time spent gambling. The majority of Aboriginal gamblers in the Niagara Region do so for an hour or less per occasion.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 58

TABLE 4 Gambling Duration

Gamblers (N=191)

Gambling Duration N %

1 minute - 1 hour 82 42.9

1.1 hour – 2 hours 19 9.9

2.1 hours – 3 hours 23 12.0

3.1 hours – 4 hours 12 6.3

4.1 hours and above 21 11.0

No response 30 15.7

0 time spent 4 2.1

Total 191 99.9

Key Informant Interviews The key informants indicated knowledge of gambling preferences from a few minutes at a time (to purchase lottery tickets) to hours or days at a time (bingo, casino and private poker games). Frequency was noted to be dependant upon the choice of gambling venue and the amount of money spent or the amount of money an individual was attempting to win (to pay their rent). Many of the key informants were aware that gamblers frequent gaming facilities on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Community Survey Table #5 shows the amount of money community members spend on gambling each month. The majority of Aboriginal gamblers spend $50.00 or less per month and more than 5% spent more than $501 per month.

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure

Gamblers (N=191)

Money Spent per Month N %

1 - 50 90 47.1

51 -100 23 12.0

101 - 200 13 6.8

201 -300 11 5.8

301 -500 6 3.1

501 - above 10 5.2

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 59

Gamblers (N=191)

Money Spent per Month N %

0 money spent 3 1.6

No response 35 18.3

Total 191 99.9

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey Table #6 gives us the gender, age and marital status of Aboriginal gamblers in the Niagara Region according the respondents to the community survey. In terms of gender and within the surveyed group, over 60% of the Aboriginal respondents indicated they were female. Those respondents in the middle age group have the highest number of gamblers. Over 35% of the Aboriginal people surveyed that gamble are married.

TABLE 6 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Gamblers

Demographic Variables Gamblers N % Gender Male 72 37.7 Female 116 60.7 No Response 3 1.6 Age 18-25 21 11.0 26-55 113 59.2 56 and above 36 18.8 No Response 21 11.0 Marital Status Single 40 20.9 Married 68 35.6 Common Law 32 16.8 Divorced/Separated 28 14.7 Widowed 18 9.4 No Response 4 2.1

Table #7 shows the amount of education and income reported by respondents to the survey. The majority of the respondents in the survey have at least some high school or a high school diploma. As far as income is concerned, the bulk of the Aboriginal gamblers that were surveyed indicate a lower to middle annual income ($15,000 to $40,000).

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 60

TABLE 7 Education and Income

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Education No School 1 .5 Some Elementary 10 5.2 Completed Elementary 6 3.1 Some High School 40 20.9 Completed High School 37 19.4 Some College 18 9.4 Completed College 22 11.5 Some Tech School 7 3.7 Completed Tech School 4 2.1 Some University 20 10.5 Completed Bachelor’s 15 7.9 Completed Masters 4 2.1 Professional Degree 5 2.6 No Response 2 1.1 Total 191 100 Annual Household Income 0 - $14,000 20 10.5 $15,000 - $25,000 31 16.2 $25,100 - $40,000 31 16.2 $40,100 - $60,000 27 14.1 $60,100 - $100,000 22 11.5 $100,100 and above 9 4.7 No Response 51 26.7 Total 191 99.9

Aboriginal ancestry for gamblers is shown in Table #8. Within the Aboriginal community in the Niagara Region, the Métis people that participated in the survey reported having the largest number of gamblers.

TABLE 8 Aboriginal Ancestry

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Aboriginal Ancestry First Nation 91 47.6 Métis 93 48.7 No Response 7 3.7 Total 191 100.0

Table #9 indicates the number of minor children living in the gambler’s household. The majority of gamblers reported that there were no minors living in the same household. Of the households reporting minors most have only one, two or three minors living in the home (minors are defined as persons’ under the age of eighteen).

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 61

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Number Under 18 Residing No minors 112 58.6 1 -3 minors 68 35.6 4 -5 minors 3 1.6 6 or more 2 1.0 No Response 6 3.1 Total 191 99.9

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in the Niagara Region?

Focus Groups

The people in the Elders’ focus groups spoke of gambling on dog races, snow snakes and peach pits as traditional gambling practices from their background, traditions and customs.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that problem gamblers were people that were addicted to gambling. People that would often try to win back their lost money and would gamble almost every day at bingo or casinos. The focus groups thought that the problem gambler allowed gambling to become the priority in their lives. Problem gamblers were further defined as people who spend all their money on gambling instead of necessities and then have to ask the community for support.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Community Survey Table #10 offers the “suggested” prevalence of problem gambling in the community, based on the sample of people that completed the community survey questionnaire. The “suggested” prevalence of problem gamblers is 5.2%.

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers (PGSI=0) (PGSI=1-2) (PGSI=3-7) (PGSI=8+) 92 33 21 10 48.2% 17.3% 11.0% 5.2%

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 62

Focus Groups The focus group participants thought that nearly everyone gambles in one form or another but very few people would admit to being a problem gambler. The focus group members indicated that the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling is low.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Community Survey Table #11 shows personal and social behaviours experienced by problem gamblers such as health problems, feeling guilty and having financial problems as a result of their gambling.

TABLE 11 Attributable Behaviours by Gambler sub-type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Attributable Behaviours N % N % N % N %

Personal Behaviours Bet more than can afford to lose Never 84 91.3 17 51.5 8 38.1 1 10.0 Sometimes 7 7.6 14 42.4 11 52.4 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 1 3.0 2 9.5 2 20.0 Almost always 1 1.1 1 3.0 0 0 1 10.0 Spend more than you wanted Never 92 100.0 10 30.3 6 28.6 0 0 Sometimes 0 0 22 66.7 14 66.7 5 50.5 Most of the time 0 0 1 3.0 1 4.8 4 40.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Need to gamble with larger amounts Never 92 100.0 29 87.9 13 61.9 0 0 Sometimes 0 0 4 12.1 8 38.1 9 90.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tried to win money back Never 92 100.0 27 81.8 8 38.1 1 10.0 Sometimes 0 0 6 18.2 13 61.9 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Borrow money or sold anything Never 92 100.0 33 100.0 15 71.4 1 10.0 Sometimes 0 0 0 0 6 28.6 9 90.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Social Behaviours

Lied to family and others Never 92 100.0 31 93.9 13 61.9 3 30.0 Sometimes 0 0 2 6.1 8 38.1 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 63

Focus Groups The focus group members spoke of attributable behaviours as being denial and financial difficulties that increased amounts of time spent gambling and abusive toward family and friends.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Community Survey Problem gamblers, as shown in Table #12, indicate that they have health problems, feel guilty and have financial problems as a result of their gambling.

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Adverse Consequences N % N % N % N % Personal Consequences Health problems (stress and anxiety) Never 92 100.0 32 97.0 11 52.4 1 10.0 Sometimes 0 0 1 3.0 10 47.6 7 70.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20.0 Felt had gambling problem Never 92 0 32 97.0 13 61.9 0 0 Sometimes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Most of the time 0 0 1 3.0 8 38.1 10 100.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Felt like to stop gambling Never 90 97.8 33 100.0 16 76.2 3 30.0 Sometimes 0 0 0 0 4 19.0 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 People criticized gambling Never 92 100.0 30 90.9 15 71.4 1 10.0 Sometimes 0 0 3 9.1 6 28.6 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20.0 Felt guilty Never 92 100.0 31 93.9 10 47.6 1 10.0 Sometimes 0 0 2 6.1 11 52.4 6 60.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20.0 Social Consequences Financial problems for gambler or household Never 92 100.0 30 90.9 13 61.9 0 0 Sometimes 0 0 3 9.1 8 38.1 7 70.0 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10.0

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 64

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey A demographic profile of problem gamblers in the community is presented in the following four tables (Table #13, Table #14, Table #15 and Table #16). These tables show the gender, age, marital status, education and income, employment status/occupation and their Aboriginal ancestry.

Aboriginal problem gamblers in the Niagara Region by gender, age and marital status are presented in Table #13. In terms of gender, males and females are evenly split. Age groups show that the middle age groups have the higher number of problem gamblers. Marital status indicates that those reporting as married have the highest percentage of problem gamblers.

TABLE 13 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Gender Male 4 7.1 Female 4 4.1 Age 18-25 0 0 26-55 8 8.8 56 and above 2 6.3 No Response 10 6.4 Marital Status Single 0 0 Married 7 11.5 Common-Law 0 0 Divorced/Separated 2 9.1 Widowed 1 6.7 No Response 0 0

Table #14 shows the education and income levels of problem gamblers. The problem gamblers tend to have the highest annual household incomes.

TABLE 14 Education and Income of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Education Some Elementary 0 0 Completed Elementary 1 33.3 Some High School 2 6.9 Completed High School 0 0 Some College 2 13.3

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 65

Problem Gamblers Completed College 2 10.5 Some Tech School 0 0 Completed Tech School 0 0 Some University 3 15.0 Completed Bachelor’s 0 0 Completed Master’s 0 0 Professional Degree 0 0 Annual Household Income $0-$14,000 1 6.7 $15,100-$25,000 1 4.2 $25,100-$40,000 2 7.7 $40,100-$60,000 1 4.0 $60,100-$100,000 1 4.8 $100,100 and above 2 22.2 No Response 2 5.6

Table #15 presents employment status and occupations of problem gamblers. As far as employment status, the category of retired people has the highest percentage of problem gamblers. Those that are employed in the hospitality industry have the highest percentage of problem gamblers in their field of occupation.

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Employment Status Employed full-time (30 or more hrs/week) 4 5.5 Employed part-time (less than 30hrs/week) 3 11.1 Unemployed (out of work but looking for work) 0 0 Student: employed part-time or full-time 0 0 Student: not employed 0 0 Retired 3 13.6 Homemaker 0 0 No Response 0 0 Occupation Professional 2 4.3 Retail 0 0 Hospitality 2 16.7 Labourer 0 0 Other 2 9.5 No Response 4 11.4

The problem gamblers’ Aboriginal ancestry is shown in Table #16. Of the problem gamblers identified through the community survey, 7.1% are First Nations people.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 66

TABLE 16 Aboriginal Ancestry of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Aboriginal Ancestry First Nation 5 7.1 Métis 4 5.1 No Response 1 14.3

Question 6: Does problem gambling in the Niagara Region differ from problem gambling in the past?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that most of the games are different now, although cards (poker) have been around for a long time and are still around. Generally not much difference reported.

Key Informants Key Informants thought that problem gambling is a more acceptable part of our culture today due to the increased access and availability today to casinos, lottery tickets and bingo halls.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that generally speaking, the community members and the problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable or educated about problem gambling. Most people are not knowledgeable about problem gambling because they do not believe it exists. The community is not fully aware of the seriousness of problem gambling.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Focus Groups The focus group participants thought there was a general lack of concern. It was suggested that the community members do not think that a problem exists; therefore, there is no real concern.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Focus Groups The focus groups felt that community members generally do not feel that there are significant numbers of gamblers with problems. Therefore, they did not identify any attitudes that people hold toward problem gamblers.

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 67

Focus Groups The focus groups indicated that the telephone hotline number was available and that there is Gamblers Anonymous.

Key Informant Interviews The key informants reported that the Niagara Alcohol and Drug Assessment Service has a gambling assistance program with counsellors and health workers, also reported were resources available at the Women’s Addiction Recovery in Fort Erie. Two other addiction programs were identified, one in Brantford and one on the Six Nations Reserve

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that community members and problem gamblers do not know what programs or services exist. It was generally thought that community members may feel there are some services available but do not know how or where to access them.

Key Informants The key informants thought that the community members and the problem gamblers were not very knowledgeable at all about what resources are available. It was felt that the level of awareness is very low.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought the preferences were for more public education and more talking circles.

Key Informants The key informants thought that more private counselling was needed and more community involvement. It was also felt that more Aboriginal specific programs and services were needed, such as talking circles and sweat lodges.

5. CONCLUSIONS Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Conclusion The Aboriginal community in Niagara Region defined gambling in relationship to a number of legal gambling activities. These activities include gambling on lottery tickets, scratch tickets, horse racing, slot machines, bingos and casino gambling.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community?

Conclusion The “perceived” prevalence of gambling within the Niagara Regional Aboriginal community is that almost everyone gambles and, therefore, the “perceived” prevalence of gambling is high. The

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 68

“suggested” prevalence from the community survey of gambling among Aboriginal people in the Niagara Region is 92%.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Conclusion The top five activities that community members engage in are the legal activities of lottery tickets, instant win or scratch tickets, bingos, raffles and coin slots in casinos.

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Conclusion The gambling is taking place at any location where gambling tickets are sold and in bingo halls and gambling casinos. Gambling at bingo almost always takes place in the evening. Community members gamble at casinos mostly during the daytime but with some evening activity and in many cases 24 hours per day.

Question 5: How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

Conclusion The highest percentages of gamblers gamble at least once per week and gamble at least an hour per session. The exception would be the purchase and playing of lottery tickets and scratch tickets that takes very little time.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Conclusion The majority of Aboriginal gamblers in the Niagara Region spend less than $100.00 per month on gambling.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Conclusion The gamblers in the Niagara Region Aboriginal community, as identified from our survey results, tend to be females. Most gambles are between 26 to 55 years of age and are married. The majority of the gamblers have at least some high school education. The income level of the Aboriginal gambler in the Niagara Region is between $15,000 and $40,000 per year. Of the Aboriginal groups represented in the Niagara Region, the Métis people have the highest percentage of gamblers.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been continued or abandoned by Aboriginal community members in the Niagara Region.

Conclusion Gambling on dog races, snow snakes and peach pits are gambling practices that have been abandoned from local Aboriginal traditions and customs.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 69

Conclusion The Aboriginal community in Niagara Region thought that problem gamblers were people that were addicted to gambling. People that would often try to win back their lost money and would gamble almost every day at bingo or casinos. They thought that the problem gambler allowed gambling to become the priority in their lives. Problem gamblers were further defined as people who spend all their money on gambling instead of necessities and then have to ask the community for support.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Conclusion The “perceived” prevalence rate of problem gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal community is low. Although not drawn from a non-random survey, the evidence provided by the community survey results offered a “suggested” problem gambling prevalence rate of 5.2%.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion The behaviours attributable to problem gambling are denial, spending more time away from home, financial difficulties, lying and making excuses about gambling. Others behaviours include, more focus on gambling and abusive toward family and friends.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Conclusion Problem gamblers have health problems, feel guilty about their gambling and have financial problems. Other consequences include disruption of family life, bankruptcies and abuse of credit.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Conclusion The problem gamblers in the Niagara Region Aboriginal community as defined from our survey results are males and females, aged 26 to 55 years of age and they tend to be married. They are not well educated and have a low to middle income level between $25,000 and $40,000 per year. Of the Aboriginal groups represented in the Niagara Region, the First Nations people have the highest percentage of problem gamblers.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in the Niagara Region differ from problem gambling in the past?

Conclusion Some of the games played are different today but by in large not a tremendous amount of difference from problem gambling in the past.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 70

Conclusion The community members and problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable about problem gambling. The community in general lacks knowledge and does not believe problem gambling exists.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Conclusion There is a general lack of concern and, perhaps, most community members do not even think problem gambling exists. Because the community does not believe a problem exists, there is no real concern.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Conclusion Since the community members do not think there is problem gambling, there is insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions about the attitudes the community members hold toward those with a gambling problem.

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion Community members were only able to identify the telephone hotline number and that there may be a Gambler’s Anonymous group but, generally it was felt that there is not much in the way of resources available.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion For the most part, community members and problem gamblers do not know what programs or services exist. The community members feel that there are some services available but they do not know how or where to access them.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Conclusion The community members’ preferences are that there be more public education, more private counselling and more Aboriginal specific programming, such as talking circles and sweat lodges.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 71

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire

The following Survey Questions are a portion of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index

All Responses are Confidential

No Names are Required

Date of Birth:______19_____

Male___ Female___

What is your aboriginal ancestry?______

What is your community of residence?______

What is your current marital status?

7. Single (never married) 8. Married 9. Common-law 10. Divorced or separated 11. Widowed 9. No response

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

17. No schooling 18. Some elementary school 19. Completed elementary school 20. Some high school/junior high 21. Completed high school 22. Some community college 23. Some technical school 24. Completed community college (certificate, diploma) 25. Completed technical school (certificate, diploma) 26. Some University 27. Completed Bachelor’s Degree 28. Completed Master’s Degree 29. Completed Doctoral Degree 30. Professional Degree 98. Don’t know 99. No response

What is your present job status?

10. Employed full-time (30 or more hours/week) 11. Employed part-time (less than 30 hours/week) 12. Unemployed (out of work but looking for work)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 72

13. Student – Employed part-time or full-time 14. Student – Not employed 15. Retired 16. Homemaker 17. Don’t know 18. No response

What type of work do you currently do (or, what do you do when you are employed)?

How many people under the age of 18 live with you?______

What is your total household income, before taxes, last year?______

The following questions were used to determine gambling involvement, problem gambling behaviour and adverse consequences.

1. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, have you bet or spent money on any of the following: (select all that apply)

Gambling tickets 1. Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2. Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3. Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4. Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5. Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6. Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7. Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8. Casino slot machines 9. Arcade or video games for money 10. Gambling on the Internet

Sports Betting 11. Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12. Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13. Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14. Sports with a bookie

Horse Racing 15. Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

Casinos 16. Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17. Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 73

Speculative investments 18. Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs)

Other gambling 19. Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20. Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21. Any other form of gambling (______specify)

2. Thinking of the past twelve (12) months, how often did you bet or spend money on the following:

Gambling tickets 1.Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2.Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3.Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4.Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5.Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6.Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7.Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8.Casino slot machines 9.Arcade or video games for money 10.Gambling on the Internet

Sports betting 11.Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12.Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13.Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14.Sports with a bookie

Horse racing 15.Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

Casinos 16.Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17.Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Speculative Investments 18.Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs)

Other gambling 19.Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20.Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21.Any other form of gambling (______specify)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 74

1. Daily 2. 2-6 times/week 3. About once/week 4. 2-3 times/month 5. About once/month 6. 6-11 times/year 7. 1-5 times/year 8. Never in the past year 98. Don’t know 99. No response

3. Thinking of the past twelve (12) months, when spending money on any of the following activities, how many minutes/hours do you normally spend each time?

Gambling tickets 1.Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2.Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3.Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4.Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5.Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6.Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7.Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8.Casino slot machines 9.Arcade or video games for money 10.Gambling on the Internet

Sports betting 11.Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12.Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13.Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14.Sports with a bookie

Horse racing 15.Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

Casinos 16.Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17.Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Speculative investments 18.Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs)

Other gambling 19.Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20.Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21.Any other form of gambling (______specify)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 75

4. Thinking of the past twelve (12) months, how much money, not including winnings, do you spend on the following activities in a typical month?

Gambling tickets 1.Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2.Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3.Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4.Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5.Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6.Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7.Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8.Casino slot machines 9.Arcade or video games for money 10.Gambling on the Internet

Sports betting 11.Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12.Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13.Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14.Sports with a bookie

Horse racing 15.Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track) Casinos 16.Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17.Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Speculative investments 18.Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs)

Other gambling 19.Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20.Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21.Any other form of gambling (______specify)

5. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, what is the largest amount of money you ever spent on any of the following activities in any one day?

Gambling tickets 1.Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2.Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3.Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break-open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4.Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 76

5.Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6.Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7.Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8.Casino slot machines 9.Arcade or video games for money 10.Gambling on the Internet

Sports betting 11.Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12.Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13.Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14.Sports with a bookie

Horse Racing 15.Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

CASINOS 16.Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17.Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)]

Speculative Investments 18.Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs) Other Gambling 19.Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20.Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21.Any other form of gambling (______specify)

6. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9.No response

7. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet or spent more money than you wanted to on gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 77

8. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you needed to gamble with larger amounts of money to get the same feeling of excitement?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

9. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you gone back another day to try to win back the money you lost?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

10. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

11. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

12. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response 13. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt like you would like to stop betting money or gambling, but you didn’t think you could?

1. Never

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 78

2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

14. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have people criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether or not you thought it was true?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

15. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

16. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has gambling caused you any health problems, including stress or anxiety?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

17. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has your gambling caused any financial problems for you or your household?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 79

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide

The following guiding questions are used as our Focus Group Instrument.

The facilitator will be asked to use the following questions (shown below by the Goal area being addressed) as topics for discussion and notes will be taken and the sessions will be recorded.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1 - What activities do community members define as gambling? Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of gambling in the community? Question 4 - Where and when do community members gamble? Question 7 - Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Elders’ Focus Groups only

Question 8 - What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in your town or city?

Goal Two:To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1 - What do community members define as ‘’problem gambling’’? Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question 3 - What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question 4 - What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question 5 - Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Elders’ Focus Groups only

Question 6 - Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from the problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three:To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question 1 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question 2 - How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question 3 - What are the community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four:To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question 2 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about the resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 80

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire

The following guiding questions are used as our instrument for Key Informant Interviews.

The interviewer will be asked to use the following questions (shown by goal area below) and notes will be taken and the interview will be recorded

Goal One:To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of gambling in the community?

Elders Key Informants only

Question 8 - What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in your town or city?

Goal Two:To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 2 - What is the ‘’perceived’’ prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question 3 - What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question 4 - What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Elder Key Informants only

Question 6 - Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from the problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three:To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question 1 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Goal Four:To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question 1 - What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question 2 - How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about the resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question 3 - What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 81

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework

CASE STUDY DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT

The following Four-Component Framework is used for conducting our problem gambler interviews and developing problem gambler case studies as our instrument.

EXAMINING GAMBLING AND PROBLEM GAMBLING IN ONTARIO ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES

A FOUR-COMPONENT FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING PROBLEM GAMBLER INTERVIEWS AND DEVELOPING PROBLEM GAMBLER CASE STUDIES

Questions and prompts will be used to ensure that each problem gambler case study interview addresses the following four components.

I. Case history (life story, personal history and background)

II. Gambling history (beginnings and developments)

III. Problem gambling description (behaviours, rewards and consequences)

IV. Help-seeking recommendations (this is not an attempt to convince the problem gambler to go for help but a search for the types of services, programs and help that problem gamblers would use to get help)

Using the organization provided by the four-component framework, each case study will be written up anonymously as a story of a problem gambler and a report of a problem gambler interview.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 82

APPENDIX V Case Studies Study One:

Case History: A 37 year old Métis woman. First pregnancy at 16. Graduated high school. No post secondary school. History of domestic violence with first husband. Continuing addiction to narcotics as the result of abuse. Ceased prescription medications for depression in favour of self-medication. Employed on a casual part time basis.

Gambling History: Began attending bingo for the companionship of strangers. Had limited funds to gamble so she purchased lottery tickets weekly and went to bingo about once a week. Began to grow/sell narcotics to supplement her income and gambling habit. Began to attend the casino to play the slot machines and card games. Attends casino at least once per month with present spouse. She and spouse dream of winning big money so they can stop working. No intention of ceasing her gambling activities.

Problem Gambling Description: Used bingo to escape from her life. The atmosphere in the bingo hall was one of excitement. Most of the people in attendance appeared to be having a good time. Has rarely won any money (no more than $50) while spending up to $200 on each occasion (drain of financial resources). Views gambling as entertainment and would attend more frequently if she had discretionary income. Enjoys casino atmosphere and buffet. Believe that her turn to win has to be soon (illogical thinking).

Help Seeking Recommendations: Traditional aboriginal services. If she was to try to stop gambling a 12 step type of program with a support group would be helpful. She does not practice her Métis culture. Would be interested in learning more about it and may attend functions with people like herself.

Study Two:

Case History: A 43 year old First Nations man. Working in horse industry since 16 years of age. Divorced, two children. Presently in common-law relationship.

Gambling History: Introduced to and have gambled since he began working with horses. Not only bet on race outcomes but on every aspect of the activity from who can groom a horse the fastest to whether or not a losing owner will have a heart attack because his bet was too large to cover. Has used bookies.

Problem Gambling Description: No interests outside of horses and gambling. Defaulted twice on mortgage. Lost home on second occasion 22 years ago. Has no property of any value at this time. Chose his lifestyle over my family. Health problems: excessive use of tobacco, weight loss and grey skin.

Help Seeking Recommendations: None. Views gambling as part of the industry and part of belonging, comradery. Sees nothing wrong with his gambling and cannot and do not wish to quit.

Study Three:

Case History: A 57 year old Métis man. Business man who began working with horses as a youth. Married, grown children, grandchildren.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 83

Gambling History: Has gambled since being a youth with ever increasing stakes as his level of income rose over the years. Gambles on horses and plays cards (poker not at casino). Lost equity in home on a side bet. High stakes player. Used to gamble daily until family members intervened.

Problem Gambling Description: Financial distress, hiding loses from wife, loss of home, sold items to cover loss, loss of self-respect.

Help Seeking Recommendations: Family intervention. No group counselling. Free individual counselling with strict confidentiality. Set gambling limits.

Study Four:

Case History: A 67 year old 1st Nations woman. Widowed. Retired a few years ago. Very little formal education. Grown children and grandchildren.

Gambling History: Began attending bingo 25 years ago. Husband was working as much time as he could and her children were adults. She found that she was very lonely. A friend suggested that she go to bingo with her. She found that a lot of women like herself were there. She felt acceptance and friendship, less lonely. Did not really begin to go for the prize money. Went because of the friendship she found there.

Problem Gambling Description: Began to go to bingo more and more frequently. Domestic strife with husband resulted due to frequency of attendances. When he dies she was lonely and isolated and attended daily. When the casinos opened in Niagara Falls and Fort Erie, she and six or seven other women sometimes attend after bingo. Attends bingo almost daily. Spends up to $50 in five minutes at the slot machines. Has won thousands of dollars at a time but does not know how much she has spent. Denies financial stress. Her only form of entertainment.

Help Seeking Recommendations: None. Believes bingo is her only vice and does not believe that bingo is gambling. (It’s a way to give money to the community. Code for meeting at bingo between her friends is to say that they are “going out to donate”.) Gambling is a part of her heritage and she sees nothing wrong with what she does.

Study Five:

Case History: A 40 year old Ojibway woman. Two dependant children. Never married. Addicted to drugs for most of her adult life.

Gambling History: Went out to bars a lot as the men she became involved with were heavy drinkers. While at the bars, they would gamble on the video terminals, or the people playing them and would buy a lot of Nevada tickets. Progressed to casino slot machines to win money which she would spend on narcotics. Played video games and bought a lot of lottery tickets. Intervention occurred after drug overdose. Most of her friends gamble. Continues to attend bingo and casino and to purchase lottery and Nevada tickets but states that she plays responsibly.

Problem Gambling Description: Spent money on alcohol, gambling not needs of children. Spent gambling winnings on narcotics. Financial stress. Instant gratification if she won, more alcohol if she lost. Emotionally unstable. Did not recognize illness until counselling intervention occurred.

Help Seeking Recommendations: Traditional aboriginal and community services in conjunction assisted her. Recognizes that one addiction replaces another. Does not have the tools or desire to replace gambling altogether with something like more volunteer work.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 84

Study Six:

Case History: A 66 year old Ojibway male. Divorced with adult children and grandchildren all but one of whom are estranged from him. Addicted to alcohol and gambling. Admits to beating wife during marriage. Little formal education and is functionally illiterate. Resides alone.

Gambling History: When a young man, he began going to bingo that was held in the USA because Canada did not have them. Member of armed forces. Has gambled since being a youth. Pensions regularly spend on bingo, slot machines at casinos and lottery, Nevada and raffle tickets. Gambling is part of some Native ceremonies but not with the Ojibway. Has seen traditional ceremonies of other tribes where they gamble for position to speak with authority in the circle. The younger men usually always win because of the physical aspect of the games. Believes gambling is traditional with all Aboriginals.

Problem Gambling Description: Received traditional treatment for alcoholism (sweat lodge) and became sober. Never received treatment for gambling. Believes gambling is a part of who he is and he does not believe that it is an illness. Has sold items to support gambling. Knows he will win big one day. Fun and exciting to try to win. Sense of euphoria. When he does win he plans on buying himself an expensive car. Enjoys gambling even though running out of money while gambling makes him angry.

Help Seeking Recommendations: None. Does not want help. Traditional aboriginal services, as in past with alcoholism, if he were to seek treatment.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Niagara Region Aboriginal Community 85

EXAMINING GAMBLING AND PROBLEM GAMBLING IN THE NORTH BAY ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY

Written for the:

NORTH BAY LOCAL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE

April 8, 2005

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community 86

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...... 88

1. INTRODUCTION...... 89

1.1 Community Description ...... 89

1.2 Community Participants ...... 90

2. RESEARCH ...... 90

2.1 Purpose and Goals ...... 90

2.2 Research Questions...... 91

3. METHODS ...... 92

3.1 Community Survey...... 92

3.2 Focus Groups...... 94

3.3 Key Informant Interviews...... 94

3.4 Case Studies...... 95

4. FINDINGS ...... 95

5. CONCLUSIONS...... 107

Appendix I Survey Instrument...... 110

Appendix II Focus Group Instrument ...... 115

Appendix III Key Informant Instrument...... 117

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

87

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 Ancestry of Respondents by Gender...... 93

TABLE 2 Highest Levels of Education Achieved ...... 93

TABLE 3 Type of Gambling Activity – Past 12 Months...... 96

TABLE 4 Frequency of Play in the Past Twelve Months ...... 98

TABLE 5 North Bay: Money Spent on Respectively Gambling Activities...... 100

TABLE 6 Persons Completing Survey by Gender and Age: North Bay...... 102

TABLE 7 Gambling Activity by Gender and Age Groups...... 102

TABLE 8 Levels of Risk: North Bay ...... 104

TABLE 9 Highest Levels of Education of Problem Gamblers in North Bay Survey ...... 105

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

88

ABSTRACT Problem gambling is an emerging public health issue, which is not surprising, given the proliferation of gambling opportunities through casinos, slot machines, VLT’s, bingos, lotteries and sports betting. In recent years, a number of scientific studies have been conducted on this issue, but few have focussed specifically on gambling among Aboriginal peoples.

The overall purpose of this research was to provide insight into the nature and practice of gambling as a socio-cultural activity within the Aboriginal community in North Bay, Ontario. The research was comprised of four research methods: a community survey, focus group sessions, key informant interviews and problem gambler case studies. Directly related to the goals, the anticipated outcomes for the Aboriginal community included the following.

To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity; To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community; To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values); To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others; and To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research.

This report contains the findings on which conclusions are based, from which a comprehensive, evidence-based action plan will be developed. The findings indicate that there is gambling and problem gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal community. The community has a slight preference for Aboriginal services for problem gamblers. The action plan is expected to be developed in an action planning phase in 2005.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

89

1. INTRODUCTION In countries throughout the world, problem gambling has been acknowledged to be a serious emerging public health issue. An increase in problem gambling is not surprising as during the past decade, there has been a proliferation of gambling opportunities through casinos, electronic gambling machines, mega-bingo facilities, lotteries, sports betting, simulcast racing and Internet gambling.

At the same time, there has been a significant growth in problem gambling research as shown by the increasing number of scientific studies and articles in this field. Within this body of research, a large number of studies on gambling have been conducted in Canada, the United States, New Zealand, Australia, Great Britain and Europe. By and large, these studies on the prevalence of gambling have focused on problems within the general population. Very few studies have focused on this issue in relation to poverty, isolation and cross addictions among Aboriginal peoples.

In view of this fact, there has been increasing interest in studies that address problem gambling in Aboriginal communities. This research project was developed to contribute to our understanding of how gambling and problem gambling impacts on Aboriginal communities in Ontario, and how gambling may be viewed differently in various Aboriginal populations.

In this context, five diverse Aboriginal communities were selected for inclusion in this study. The communities differed in terms of demographics, including population size, geographic location, economics and social structures, but there were a number of social areas common to all, including a significant Aboriginal population. With regard to gambling and problem gambling, specific research was carried out in each of the five communities under the guidance of respective Local Research Advisory Committees. In each community, the final report was intended to provide a framework on which to base a plan for action at the community level to address issues relating to gambling and problem gambling. The five respective research reports were then rendered into one final report by a principal investigator.

One key concept that was recognized in such a study is cultural diversity, and cultural differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations and among different Aboriginal groups. These differences may impact upon the perception of what constitutes “problem gambling”, and upon the processes and programs intended to prevent problem gambling, to educate people about the problem, and to provide treatment to help persons overcome or deal with their problems.

In summary, this research was designed to increase our knowledge of gambling and problem gambling in Aboriginal communities and to provide a culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies for participating communities to address this serious public health issue. The following subsections provide the community description and community participants.

1.1 Community Description According to the most recent Census (2001), there is an overall population of 62,640. Of this total, 3,505, or 5.6% identify themselves as Aboriginal. Of the total Aboriginal population of 3,395, 2,235 or 65.8% identify as citizens of First Nations, while 1,160 or 34.2% identify as Métis. Of the total Aboriginal population, 1,685 (47%) are male and 1,820 (53%) are female.

In North Bay, 2,426 Aboriginal people are working age. There are 1,021 children and youth aged 0-16, accounting for 29% of the total estimated Aboriginal population. Fifty-two percent (52%) of the Aboriginal population are 29 years old or under.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

90

Many members of the North Bay Aboriginal community reside here during the school year while attending local secondary and post-secondary institutions and return to their respective communities in the summer to obtain employment.

Two primary organizations that provide assistance to Aboriginal persons in the North Bay area are the North Bay Indian Friendship Centre, established in 1974 to address the social and cultural needs of the Aboriginal community, and the North Bay Métis Council, primarily a service delivery authority for Métis people in the area. The role of the Friendship Centre has changed somewhat over the years, so that its role now includes delivery of various programs dealing with a range of issues, including health, employment and training, justice, addictions, family support, and shelter. The objectives of the Métis Council of North Bay include the design and delivery of programs to citizens registered with the Métis Nation of Ontario tailored to their particular needs, rather than to simply acquire funding for existing programs.

The main Aboriginal languages spoken in the area are Ojibway and Cree.

1.2 Community Participants The North Bay Local Research Advisory Committee (LRAC) oversaw the research project. The LRAC represented Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal organizations that deliver services to Aboriginal people or are involved with problem gambling.

Members of the LRAC were:

Mel Jamieson, Committee Chair and President, North Bay Métis Council Kim Mianskum, Drug and Alcohol Worker, North Bay Indian Friendship Centre Lisa Pigeau-Crawford, Health Services Coordinator, North Bay Métis Council Jason Jamieson, Aboriginal Healing and Wellness Program, North Bay Métis Council Maureen O’Hare, Problem Gambling Counsellor Ray Landry, Addictions Worker, Nipissing First Nation

2. RESEARCH The research was exploratory to understand gambling and problem gambling in the Aboriginal community of North Bay. The sections below provide the purpose, goals and research questions.

2.1 Purpose and Goals The overall purpose of this research was to provide insight into the nature and practice of gambling as a socio-cultural activity within the Aboriginal community in North Bay.

Within this broad statement of purpose, the five major goals for the research project were to:

• To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity. • To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community. • To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values). • To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

91

• To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research.

2.2 Research Questions The specific research questions developed for each goal of the research project were:

GOAL ONE:

To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity

Research Questions:

Question #1: What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in? Question #4: Where and when do community members gamble? Question #5: How frequently, and for how long/session, do community members gamble? Question #6: How much money do community members spend on gambling? Question #7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in ?

GOAL TWO:

To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community

Research Questions:

Question #1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question #4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6: Does problem gambling in Ottawa differ from problem gambling in the past?

GOAL THREE:

To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values)

Research Questions:

Question #1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question #2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

92

GOAL FOUR:

To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Research Questions:

Question #1 What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

A long-term goal is to develop and implement an Action Plan to prevent and address Aboriginal problem gambling, in cooperation with members of the community and the continued guidance of the Local Research Advisory Committee.

3. METHODS The research methods for the project included a community survey, focus group sessions, and key informant interviews. We had also planned to conduct six (6) case studies.

3.1 Community Survey A community survey was taken to gauge the extent of gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal persons in North Bay.

Sampling One hundred and eighty-eight (188) Aboriginal persons - Indian and Métis - were surveyed. No Inuit were included.

Surveys were completed by Aboriginal persons on membership or service-recipient lists of the Friendship Centre and the Métis Council, by upper level high school and post secondary students, by health program managers at the Friendship Centre and at the Métis Council, and by members of organizations that deliver services to Aboriginal people in the North Bay area.

Table 1 shows that the vast majority of the Aboriginal respondents were First Nations citizens, this population being made up primarily of Ojibway, Algonquin and Cree. The number of Métis persons who responded to the survey, viz. 6.4%, is significantly below the number that would be expected to respond, given that 34.2% of the Aboriginal population in North Bay were identified in the last census as Métis.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

93

TABLE 1 Ancestry of Respondents by Gender

NATION Gender Total Percent Female Male Ojibway 56 50 106 56.4% Algonquin 32 13 45 23.9% Cree 8 13 21 11.2% Mohawk 0 2 2 1.1% Mi’gmaq 0 2 2 1.0% First Nations 96 80 176 93.6% Métis 3 9 12 6.4% Totals 99 89 188

As shown in Table 2, the vast majority of persons who completed the survey have some, or have completed high school and/or technical school. Thirty-one or 16.5% have completed high school, 25% have some community college or technical school training, while 16% have completed community college or technical school. Eleven per cent (11%) of the respondents have completed studies for Bachelor of Arts or higher degrees. Three times as many females as males have completed university or completed higher degrees.

TABLE 2 Highest Levels of Education Achieved

Type of Education Gender Total Female Male Some Elementary 5 4 9 Completed Elementary School 3 3 6 Some High School/Junior High 11 21 32 Completed High School 13 18 31 Some Community College 21 23 44 Some Technical School 1 2 3 Completed Community College 20 6 26 Completed Technical School 1 3 4 Some University 9 3 12 Completed BA 13 4 17 Completed Masters 2 1 3 Professional Degree 0 1 1 Total 99 89 188

For the 153 reporting on this item, household incomes ranged from $3,000 to $145,000, with an average of $37,125. If the two households reporting income over $100,000 are excluded, the average drops to $35, 795 per year. Thirteen households reported income of $10,000 or less, with an average of $7,385; thirty-six reported household incomes from $11,000 to $20,000, with an average of $15,445.

Data Collection We prepared a survey instrument to be completed by Aboriginal persons willing to participate in the survey.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

94

The first section of the survey instrument requested demographic information of the respondent. Survey participants were then asked to respond to 17 questions, which were basically the same as the first 17 questions contained in the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (see the survey instrument in Appendix I).

Data Analysis This information was used to develop a quantitative database upon which findings of the research project were articulated.

A computer program was used to compile and analyze the data and to generate descriptive statistics (e.g. frequencies, averages and percentages, etc.) which were incorporated into this report.

3.2 Focus Groups Participants were selected from among persons in the Aboriginal community-at-large in North Bay. Among a number of other discussion topics, members of each focus group were asked to contribute to a definition of gambling and associated problems, from their perspective.

Our focus group facilitators were guided by a set of discussion questions. The group responses to the questions were written down on flip-chart paper, tape-recorded and then transcribed.

Sampling Members of the focus groups were recruited from a cross-section of individuals from four sectors of the Aboriginal community: secondary school students, post-secondary students, (non-student) adults, and elders. We held five focus groups, with a total of 44 participants.

Data Collection We prepared a guide to facilitate discussion and ensure key points are covered off during the focus group, and selected a facilitator to lead discussions and to track items discussed.

We determined times and dates and arranged locations for meetings of each focus group and informed those who indicated they would participate in the respective groups.

With the agreement of the participants, we recorded on tape and in writing the responses and comments of the participants.

Data Analysis This analysis was qualitative in nature, and we produced written summaries of the tapes and notes. We conducted a content analysis to identify themes relating to attitudes and issues raised or identified in the focus groups, and the findings are contained in this report.

3.3 Key Informant Interviews Key informant interviews were held to obtain the opinions of knowledgeable persons about gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal persons in the area.

Sampling We interviewed senior personnel from three (3) Aboriginal organizations.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

95

Data Collection We developed an interview guide (see Appendix) for use during an interview with the key informants and the Research Assistant used the guide to interview them. Responses were recorded on tape and in writing, after each of the respondents agreed to this.

Data Analysis We summarized the information contained in the tapes and notes. The qualitative data contained in the summaries were used to identify common themes and issues.

3.4 Case Studies We wanted to conduct several Case Studies to obtain the views and opinions of people who actually have or had gambling problems. Unfortunately, we were not able to interview anyone; although we set up specific appointments, the potential respondents did not show up.

4. FINDINGS The research findings are provided in the following sections on a goal-by-goal basis. Each research question is listed and the findings are presented by identifying the research method from which the findings were derived.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Focus Groups:

The Focus Groups did not give a definition of gambling, specifically, but identified specific types of gaming in effort to define gambling. Thus, all five of the Focus Groups included “Gambling Tickets”, “Bingo” and “Horse Racing” in their definition of gambling. Four of the five groups included “Electronic Gambling” (specifically slots), “Sports Betting” and “Games at Provincial Casinos”, and “Other Gambling”, in their definitions.

Key Informants:

All three Key Informants said the activities they thought about as gambling were Bingo and Instant Win tickets. Two each identified play at casinos and at horse races, and one each identified Lotteries, Card Games, Pools and the Internet as “gambling”.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

Focus Groups:

All five of the Focus Groups there was a “high” level of gambling among the Aboriginal population in North Bay.

Key Informants:

All three of the key informants perceived the prevalence of gambling to be high.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

96

Community Survey:

The vast majority of gaming activity among those completing the survey reported that they played: • lotteries (80%); • “scratch ‘n’ win” tickets (77%); • raffles (57%) and Bingo (53%); and • slot machines at 44%.

The next most frequent areas of play were: • Cards with family or friends (39%); • Sports Pools (24%); • Proline (20%); • Games of Skill (14%); and • At a Provincial Casino (12%).

Daily lotteries, horse racing, VLT’s, and sports bets were engaged in by less than 10 % of respondents, with “Sports Bets” indicated at 5%. The lowest “scores” were assigned to gambling on the Internet, other casinos, arcades, stocks, betting with bookies, and the playing of “non-regulated games”, all coming in at less than 5%. These figures are summarized in Table 3, below

TABLE 3 Type of Gambling Activity – Past 12 Months (% OUT OF 188)

ACTIVITY NUMBER PERCENT RANK ORDER

Lotteries 151 80% 1 Scratch & Win 144 77% 2 Raffles 108 57% 3 Bingo 99 53% 4 Slots 82 44% 5 Cards 73 39% 6 Pools 46 24% 7 Proline 38 20% 8 Games of Skill 27 14% 9 Provincial Casino 22 12% 10 Daily Lotteries 18 10% 11 Horses 17 9% 12 Video Lottery Terminals 9 5% 13 Sports Outcomes 9 5% 14 Internet 8 4% 15 Other Casinos 5 3% 16 Arcades 4 2% 17 Stocks 4 2% 18 Bookies 3 2% 19 Non-regulated Games 3 2% 20 Other 1 1% 21

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

97

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Focus Groups:

Four of the five Focus Groups thought the most frequent location for gambling activities would include bingo halls and lottery-ticket outlets, then casinos (3 groups) and then the home (for cards and weekly TV Bingo), in that order. Other locations included churches, community halls, pool halls and the Friendship Centre.

The same four out of five Focus Groups thought that for Bingo or gambling on lottery tickets (including “scratch ‘n’ win”), people play on a daily basis, while TV Bingo or playing of cards at home would occur weekly. Playing at various other locations would occur “weekly” or “occasionally”.

Key Informants:

The Key Informants thought persons gamble at the beginning or end of the month when cheques come in, on paydays, or any time that money is available. One said people gamble any time they are out.

They would play in Bingo halls, ticket sales booths, kiosks and casinos.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long per session, do community members gamble?

Community Survey:

Duration of Play

The following is a summary of the duration of play for the areas of gambling.

Gambling Tickets: Of the 151 who played lottery tickets, only 2 spent more than 10 minutes; 133 spent 5 minutes or less. For Scratch & Win tickets, of 140 respondents, 110 spent less than 10 minutes; of this number, 64 spent 5 minutes or less; for raffles, the vast majority (93 persons) spent less than 5 minutes.

Bingo: Of the 99 who responded to this question, the vast majority of players spent 2 to 3 hours or more, with 6 persons spending 4 hours or more.

Family & Friends: Of the 70 respondents, all except 2 spent 1 hour or more on this, while the large majority (53) spent 2 to 4 hours.

Electronic Gambling: Of the 9 persons who played VLT’s, only 1 spent less than a half hour at play; 2 spent a half hour, 3 spent 1 hour, 2 spent 2 hours, and 1 spent 4 hours on this activity. On the slots, of the 78 reporting, 9 persons spent 30 minutes or less; the majority (47) spent 1 to 2 hours, while 18 said they spent 3 to 5 hours. One person indicated s/he spent over 11 hours at the slots. Of the 4 reporting on arcades, 1 spent 10 minutes and 2 spent 1 hour. For the Internet, 4 of the 8 were on for a half hour or less, 1 was on for 1 hour and 2 for 2 hours; 1 person indicated s/he was on for almost 7 hours.

Sports Betting: The 40 people answering all spent less than 30 minutes on this, with 35 spending from 5 to 20 minutes. For the 45 reporting on pools, all except 1 spent less than 30 minutes; the exception indicated s/he spent 3 hours on this. For the 10 betting on outcomes of sports events, all spent less than 15 minutes on this. Two persons said they spent 5 minutes, and 1 spent 20 minutes per session with a bookie.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

98

Horse Racing: Of the 19 respondents, only 1 indicated less than one hour, 14 said they spent 1 to 2 hours, and the remaining 4 spent from 3 to 8 hours at the races.

Casinos: Twenty-one of the 23 who responded with regard to provincial casinos indicated they spent from 1 to 7 hours on site, with 16 indicating 1-3 hours. At other casinos, the 5 who reported said they spent from 1 to 8 hours there.

Spec. Investments: The 2 respondents indicated they spent time 2 hours on this.

Other Gambling: For “games of skill”, 5 of 27 said they spent less than 1 hours on this activity. The majority indicated they played from 1 to 4 hours, although 1 indicated 6 hours and 2 indicated 8 hours of play. The three who responded to “card games in non-regulated setting” said they spent 2-3 hours on this.

Frequency of Play: * (1 person gave “No Response” to Q. 4 (Raffles) and 2 gave “No Response” to Q. 7 (VLTs))

For lottery tickets, the most frequent play was from 2-6 times per week to 2-3 times a month, and for instant win, the most frequent play was from daily to2-3 times a month. Raffle tickets were bought less frequently, the majority being purchased once a month to 1-5 times a year. Frequency of play at bingo by the 86 respondents was spread quite evenly across the grid. Card games with family/friends occurred most frequently between 2-3 times a month to 1-5 times a year. Play at the slots was less frequent, occurring most often from once a month to 1-5 times a year. Sports betting was identified as occurring on a daily basis or from 2-6 times a week, while pool bets were placed only 6-11 times a year or 1-5 times a year.

TABLE 4 Frequency of Play in the Past Twelve Months N = 188

2-6 x Once a 2-3 x Once a 6-11 x 1-5 x Type of Gambling Daily week Week Month Month Year Year Total 1. Lottery Tickets 22 49 29 18 11 21 150 2. Daily Lottery Tickets 5 7 5 1 18 3. Instant Win or Scratch Tickets 4 24 22 24 24 14 22 134 4. Raffles/Fund Raising * 1 2 3 17 23 59 105 5. Bingo 12 14 18 10 10 22 86 6. Cards/Games-Family/Friends 3 7 14 13 10 21 68 7. Video Lottery Terminals * 1 2 1 3 7 8. Slot Machines 3 8 12 41 64 9. Arcade/Video Games for $ 4 4 10. Internet Gambling 1 2 2 1 2 8 11. Sports Betting (Proline) 9 9 3 2 4 11 38 12. Sports Pools 14 30 44 13. Gamble on Sporting Events 1 1 4 3 9 14. Betting with a Bookie 0 15. Horse Races 1 2 1 3 5 12 16. Games at Provincial Casinos 1 3 8 4 5 21 17. Casinos Out of Province 1 3 4 18. Stocks/Options/Commodities 1 2 3 19. Games of Skill for Money 2 2 2 1 2 10 19 20. Non-regulated Card Games 1 1 2 21 Other Form of Gambling 1 1

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

99

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

The following is a summary of the information presented in Table 6 below.

Gambling Tickets: Of the 136 who responded for lotteries, 45 spent $5 or less (29 spent $5), 21 spent $10, 33 spent $20, and 15 spent $40. In total, 131 persons spent $40 or less. Three persons reported spending $100 each. Twelve of the 17 respondents reported spending $10 or less on daily lottery tickets, with the remaining 5 spending $15, $20 and $30, respectively. Of the 125 who reported on “scratch & win” tickets, 42 spent $5 or less; 24 spent $10 and 34 spent $20; 3 spent $25, 8 spent $30, and 4 spent $40. For raffles, 58 spent $5 or less, and 26 spent $10. In total, 92 of the 93 respondents spent $40 or less; the remaining 1 spent $180.

Bingo: Of the 83 reporting on bingo, 4 reported spending $15 or less, 35 spent $20 to $40, 21spent from $50 to $100, 9 spent $120 to $160, while 10 reported spending $200.

Family & Friends: Sixty of the 61 reporting here spent from $2 to $100, with 10 spending $10, 19 spending $20, and 8 spending $50 on card games with family and friends.

Electronic Gambling: For VLT’s, of the 14 persons responding, 5 spent $5, 1 spent $10, 3 spent $20, 1 spent $40, 1 spent $50, 2 spent $100 and 1 spent $200. Of 56 reporting on slots, 3 spent $10, 8 spent $20, 5 spent $40, 10 spent $50 and 17 spent $100. One each spent $180 and $350, and two each $150, $200 and $ 300. Only 1 reported on the arcade: s/he spent $10. Five of the 6 respondents reported spending $20 to $40 on Internet gambling; the other spent $15.

Sports Betting: Of the 35 respondents, 20 spent $20 or less: 8 spent $5, 7 spent $10, 2 spent $15, and 3 $20; 7 report spending $40, 4 $50 and 2 $100 on Proline, etc. For pools, 35 of the 38 respondents spent $20 or less; 2 reported spending $60. For the 8 who bet on sports games, 7 spent $20 or less; the other spent $50. The 1 who used a bookie spent $350.

Horse Racing: Spending by the 13 reporting on racing bets ranged from 1 at $4 to 4 at $100 to 3 at $200; 1 each spent $10, 15, 20, 40, and $50, respectively.

Casinos: Of the 20 responding to provincial casinos, all except 1 reported spending more than $40, with 3 spending $50, 4 spending $100, 5 $200, 3 $300 and 2 $500. For other casinos, 2 of 3 respondents reported spending $40 and 1 $100.

Stocks: Of the 3 reporting on stocks, they spent $100, $400 and $1000+, respectively.

Other Gambling: Of 11 reporting on games of skill, 5 spent $5 or less, 2 spent $50 and 1 each spent $10, $20, $30 and $100 respectively. Of the 2 who reported on non-regulated play, one each spent $10 and $50. No respondents reported on “other”.

The vast majority of figures reported coincided with the denomination of bills or with “round” figures; 126 reported spending $5, 107 spent $10, 129 spent $20 and 60 spent $40. The next most frequently mentioned categories were $50 (by 39), $100 (49), $200 (22) and $300 (9). Only 2 each reported spending $500 and $1000+, respectively.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

100

TABLE 5 North Bay: Money Spent on Respectively Gambling Activities

Amt. Lot DLt Scrt Raffl Bing Card VLT Slot Arcd Intn Prol Pool Spor Book Race Pcas Ocaz Stok Skil Nreg Othr Tot Amt. $1 1 1 1 1 2 6 $1 $2 5 8 21 2 5 1 42 $2 $3 8 1 2 2 1 1 15 $3 $4 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 11 $4 $5 29 6 29 33 4 5 8 7 2 1 2 126 $5 $6 4 1 4 1 1 11 $6 $7 ---- $7 $8 1 1 $8 $9 ---- $9 $10 21 4 24 26 2 10 1 3 1 7 3 2 1 1 1 107 $10 $11 ---- $11 $12 1 1 $12 $13 1 1 $13 $14 ---- $14 $15 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 14 $15 $16 ---- $16 $17 1 1 $17 $18 ---- $18 $19 ---- $19 $20 33 3 34 3 3 19 3 8 2 3 14 2 1 1 129 $20 $25 3 3 4 1 2 1 1 1 16 $25 $30 6 1 8 2 8 4 1 1 31 $30 $35 1 1 $35 $40 15 4 1 19 2 1 5 2 7 1 1 2 60 $40 $45 ---- $45 $50 1 7 8 1 10 4 1 1 3 2 1 39 $50 $60 1 4 1 1 2 9 $60 $70 ---- $70 $80 1 2 1 4 $80 $90 1 1 $90 $100 3 2 7 5 2 17 2 4 4 1 1 1 49 $100 $120 2 2 $120 $130 1 1 $130 $140 ---- $140

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

101

Amt. Lot DLt Scrt Raffl Bing Card VLT Slot Arcd Intn Prol Pool Spor Book Race Pcas Ocaz Stok Skil Nreg Othr Tot Amt. $150 5 2 1 8 $150 $160 1 1 $160 $170 ---- $170 $180 1 1 2 $180 $190 ---- $190 $200 10 1 1 2 3 5 22 $200 $250 ---- $250 $300 4 2 3 9 $300 $350 1 1 2 $350 $400 1 1 $400 $450 ---- $450 $500 2 2 $500 1000+ 1 1 2 1000+ Totals 136 17 125 93 83 61 14 56 1 6 35 38 8 1 13 20 3 3 11 2 ---- XX XXX

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

102

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey:

Each respondent to the survey was asked to indicate his/her age and gender so we could determine categories of persons who gamble. The number of persons who completed the survey is shown in Table 6. The 105 females constituted 67.7% of the total number of respondents while the males made up 32.3%. Information compiled from their responses is shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE 6 Persons Completing Survey by Gender and Age: North Bay

Gender Age Categories & Percentage of Total Gender Total 18-25 % 26-55 % 55+ % NR % N Female 12 12.1 73 73.7 13 13.1 1 1 99 Male 18 20.2 66 74.2 4 4.5 1 1.1 89 Totals 30 16.0 139 73.9 17 9.0 2 1.1 188

TABLE 7 Gambling Activity by Gender and Age Groups

FEMALES N=99 MALES N=89 Activity Age Categories % Age Categories % Spent Money 18-25 26-55 55+ NR Σ of N 18-25 26-55 55+ NR Σ of N On: Lottery Tickets 9 63 11 0 83 83.8 9 55 3 1 68 76.4 Daily Lottery 2 3 1 0 6 6.0 0 11 1 12 13.5 Instant Win 9 56 10 0 75 75.8 16 49 4 0 69 77.5 Raffles 6 56 9 0 71 71.7 3 32 2 0 37 41.6 Bingo 9 52 8 1 70 70.7 9 20 0 0 29 32.6 Cards: Family 5 26 4 0 35 35.4 7 29 2 0 38 42.7 VLTs 2 3 0 0 5 5.0 0 4 0 0 4 4.5 Slots 5 37 3 0 45 45.5 6 30 1 0 37 41.6 Arcade 0 1 0 0 1 1.0 3 0 0 0 3 3.4 Internet 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 2 4 0 0 6 6.7 Proline 1 3 0 0 4 4.0 5 29 0 0 34 38.2 Pools 1 16 2 0 19 19.2 4 22 1 0 27 30.3 Sport Events 0 1 0 0 1 1.0 1 7 0 0 8 8.9 Bookie 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3 0 0 3 3.4 Horse Races 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 1 13 1 0 15 16.9 Prov. Casinos 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 3 15 1 1 20 22.5 Other Casinos 0 1 0 0 1 1.0 0 4 0 0 4 4.5 Stocks 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 0 1 1 0 2 2.2 Skill Games 2 3 0 0 5 5.0 7 14 1 0 22 24.7 Non-Regulated 0 2 0 0 2 2.0 0 1 0 0 1 1.1 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 1.1

The percentage calculations show that almost equal numbers of men and women participate in the purchase of Lottery and Instant Win Tickets, although c. 7% more females buy Lottery Tickets. The

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

103 purchase of Daily Lottery Tickets is low for both genders, but males buy more than twice as many as females. Almost twice as many females as males buy Raffle Tickets.

More than twice as many females as males play Bingo.

The play of cards or other games for money among family or friends, and the play of slots are about equal for both genders.

Almost twice as many males as females participate in pools.

A much greater percentage of males gamble on Proline, Horse Racing, games at Provincial Casinos (other than slots), and Games of Skill.

Focus Groups:

The Focus Group members said they do not think that any one class of persons or gender in general gambles any more than another, although three of the five groups thought social assistance recipients are gamblers.

Key Informants:

The Key Informants said they think that gamblers come from all walks of life, age, gender and economic levels.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members?

Focus Groups:

Only one of the Focus Groups spoke to traditional practices, citing sled-dog and canoe races, skinning animals and tea boiling; in general, gambling practices on traditional Aboriginal customs and activities appear not to have any great impact on present-day gambling among the Aboriginal population.

Key Informants:

The key informants spoke only of contemporary games, namely bingo and cards, as the “traditional games” that come to mind.

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Focus Groups:

The groups did not provide a definition of problem gambling.

Key Informants:

Key Informants considered problem gambling as including:

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

104

• “not paying their bills”; • “when they can not stop their play”; • “spending money that should be used for basic needs”; • “not getting food for their families”; and • “being ‘hooked’ on any type of gambling, e.g. Proline, Nevadas”.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Community Survey:

From the community survey, the prevalence of problem gambling was found to be 12.2% of the respondents. All categories of gambling are shown in Table 3.

The 23 problem gamblers are made up of seventeen (17) females and six (6) males. In terms of percentages, females make up 73.9% of the 23 problem gamblers while men make up the remaining 26.1%, outdoing the males some 3 to 1.

TABLE 8 Levels of Risk: North Bay

Level of Risk Gender No Grand Totals Female % Male % Response N % Not a Gambler/No Risk 43 43.9% 52 59.1% 0 95 50.5% Low Risk 12 12.2% 10 11.4% 2 24 12.8% Moderate Risk 24 24.5% 20 22.7% 0 44 23.4% Problem Gambler 17 17.3% 6 6.8% 0 23 12.2% No Response 2 2.0% 0 0.0% 0 2 1.1% Totals 98 88 2 188

Key Informants:

Two of the Key Informants thought that problem gambling was low, while one (1) thought it was high.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey:

As shown in Table 8 above, in response to the question of “perceived prevalence”, 23 problem gamblers were made up of seventeen (17) females and six (6) males. In terms of percentages, females made up 73.9% of the 23 problem gamblers while men made up the remaining 26.1%.

For females, the ages of the 17 ranged from 20 (2 persons) to 59 years, with an average age of 38.5 years. Their income ranged from $11,000 to $54,000, with an average of $18,850. The education levels of both the female and male problem gamblers are shown on the grid below.

For the 6 males, the minimum age was 28 and the maximum age was 43, with an average of 36.2 years. Their income ranged from $3,000 to $60,000, with an average of $28,335.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

105

TABLE 9 Highest Levels of Education of Problem Gamblers in North Bay Survey

Type of Education Gender Total Female Male Completed Elementary School 2 2 Some High School/Junior High 3 1 4 Completed High School 4 4 Some Community College 6 6 Completed Community College 4 4 Some University 1 1 Completed BA 1 1 2 Total 17 6 23

Focus Groups:

Although this question was not asked specifically of the Focus Groups, all of the Focus Groups in responding to an earlier question agreed that there is no one group or type of group that constitutes or is representative of gamblers, and by extension, it could be concluded that no one group or type of persons constitute “problem gamblers”.

Key Informants:

One Key Informant said a problem gambler is anyone who spends all the money that should be used for food and rent, etc., on gambling, and can include persons from all walks of life, all ages and genders. One thought problem gamblers were on fixed income and were aged from 40 to 60 years, and one thought problem gamblers were “men who gamble for high stakes”.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in North Bay differ from problem gambling in the past?

Focus Groups:

Three Focus Groups agreed that problem gambling today differs from problem gambling in the past, not so much in terms of impact and negative consequences, but in terms of degree; more opportunities and easy access to gambling venues, and a lot of enticement, result in a lot more people falling into problem gambling today. One group thought there was no difference from the past, and one group did not respond.

Key Informants:

The Key Informants noted that problem gambling now does differ from that in the past, because of easier and cheaper access, including Internet access, gambling is socially acceptable now and is perceived as “more fun”.

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

106

Key Informants:

One Key Informant thought the Aboriginal community members and problem gamblers were not at all knowledgeable, and two thought they were only somewhat knowledgeable about problem gambling

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Focus Groups:

The responses of the Focus Groups ranged from “not very” to “somewhat” to “quite” to “very”, distributed equally across the range, both with regard to awareness and concern.

Key Informants:

Two (2) Key Informants thought community members are not at all or only somewhat aware of, or concerned about, problem gambling.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Focus Groups:

The Focus Groups’ comments in this respect ranged from laissez-faire to sympathetic to judgmental, saying about problem gamblers that problem gambling “is their problem”, while others said that gambling is an illness, an addiction, and that people are worried and concerned; yet others said they do not like when people gamble at the expense of others, and they become angry at people who gamble all the time.

Key Informants:

The Key Informants said there’s denial that a friend, family member or an acquaintance has a gambling problem. Many people ignore the problem while many do not notice the gambling until it becomes a major problem.

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups:

All five (5) Focus Groups were aware of Gamblers Anonymous (GA). The Groups were also aware of various other programs and organizations to help problem gamblers, mentioning Hotlines or Help lines, Treatment Centres, Distress Centres, Addictions Counselling Programs and Support Groups. They also mentioned Churches, the Friendship Centre, Psychiatrists, and Family Services. Notably, they also identified problem gamblers who are no longer gambling, gamblers’ families and Aboriginal elders as sources of help.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

107

Key Informants:

All three Key Informants mentioned local gambler counselling centers, two mentioned Hotlines, and one each mentioned the local Métis health program, a system of referrals, a gambling strategy committee, and some educational materials (handouts).

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups:

Two of the Focus Groups indicated community members and problem gamblers are aware of the existence of some of the resources mentioned above, such as GA and Help lines, but are not very knowledgeable about either of these. One group thought they were very knowledgeable about the resources available, and two did not respond to the question.

Key Informants:

Key Informants thought Aboriginal community members and problem gamblers were not very knowledgeable about resources to help problem gamblers.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist (Aboriginal) problem gamblers?

Focus Groups:

Three of the five Focus Groups thought that an Aboriginal person working out of the Friendship Centre or Aboriginal peer support groups would be helpful. Three groups also cited help from a trusted friend, and counsel and advice from a former problem gambler. Two groups referred to each of the following: culturally appropriate services, financial counselling, and a free Aboriginal hotline as being helpful. The groups also mentioned that youth services, public education, workshops, church, school programs and use of the Internet would be helpful.

Key Informants:

The Key Informants thought their preferences would include one-on-one counselling, private counselling, support groups, awareness and prevention programs and … a quick bailout.

5. CONCLUSIONS DEMOGRAPHICS:

Not enough Métis were included in the survey. Findings of the study cannot realistically apply to that segment of the population. There was a fairly good balance between the numbers of female and male respondents.

GOAL ONE: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

108

The community cited the types of play that is generally available to everyday gamblers – gambling tickets, bingo and slots; nothing unusual.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

Information from the survey indicates the prevalence is high. Information from both the Focus Groups and the Key informants indicate a high prevalence as well.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Primarily those games that are generally available to the general population.

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

When they have money to do so, and they go to legal outlets: bingo halls, ticket-selling booths and kiosks, or to the racetracks and casinos.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long per session, do community members gamble?

Time spent on Gambling Tickets is minimal. Bingo, Horse Racing and Games of Skill takes up more time.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Minimal amounts are spent on Gambling Tickets; larger amounts are spent on Bingo, Slots and Horses.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Gamblers are of all ages – youth to seniors – and include both genders from all economic and educational levels.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members?

None.

GOAL TWO: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?”

Excessive gambling that takes up a lot of time and results in spending money that should rightly be used for essentials.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

The survey indicates it is high. Other respondents are split on this question.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

109

Not addressed in interviews.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Not addressed in interviews.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Problem gamblers indicated in the survey are primarily females between 20 and 59 years, with an average of 38.5 years. There are three times more female problem gamblers than male problem gamblers, according to the survey.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

It does because it is now more wide-spread, due to easy access and a change in attitude towards gambling, and the fact that it is now legal everywhere.

GOAL THREE: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Not very.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Not very.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem? They accept the persons, but take exception when people lose money they need for other things.

GOAL FOUR: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

The respondents are aware of a number of services intended to help mainstream problem gamblers, but are also aware of counselling services at the Friendship Centre and elsewhere.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

They are not really knowledgeable.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist Aboriginal problem gamblers?

A slight preference for Aboriginal services was voiced by the Focus Groups.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

110

Appendix I Survey Instrument

Community Survey Date: ______(No. ______)

SURVEY: CHECK ALL THAT APPLY (ANONYMOUS: CONFIDENTIAL WHEN COMPLETED)

(Please make sure you fill in all of the applicable blanks for each question. Thanks!)

A. Are you: Male? ____ Female? ____

B. What is your age? ____

C. What is your aboriginal ancestry? ______

D. In what community do you live now? ______

E. What is your current marital status?

1. Single (never married) 2. Married 3. Common-law 4. Divorced or separated 5. Widowed 9. No response

F. What is the highest level of education you have completed?

1. No schooling 2. Some elementary school 3. Completed elementary school 4. Some high school/junior high 5. Completed high school 6. Some community college 7. Some technical school 8. Completed community college (certificate, diploma) 9. Completed technical school (certificate, diploma) 10. Some University 11. Completed Bachelor’s Degree 12. Completed Master’s Degree 13. Completed Doctoral Degree 14. Professional Degree 98. Don’t know 99. No response

G. What is your present job status?

Employed full-time (30 or more hours/week) Employed part-time (less than 30 hours/week)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

111

Unemployed (out of work but looking for work) Student – Employed part-time or full-time Student – Not employed Retired Homemaker Don’t know No response

H. What type of work do you currently do (or, what did you do when you were employed)?

I. With regard to lodging, do you:

own your house? rent? other (Explain) ______

J. How many people under the age of 18 live in your household? ______

K. What was your total household income, before taxes, last year? $ ______

Please continue. Use the Legend below to complete the table on the next page

LEGEND Question Response Q1. Have you bet or spent money on this activity? Check all that apply Q2. How often did you bet or spend money on Daily this activity? 2-6 times/week About once/week 2-3 times/month About once/month 6-11 times/year 1-5 times/year Never in the past year 98. Don’t know 99. No response Q3. How many minutes/hours do you normally spend on this activity each time you play? Indicate Total Number of Minutes Q4. How much money, not including winnings, did you spend on this activity in a typical month? Indicate Total Number of Dollars Q5. What is the largest amount of money you have spent on this activity in any one day? Indicate Number of Dollars

Thinking about the past 12 months, please check (in column 2 for Q1) all the gambling activities in column one that you have engaged in. If you did not check any activities, you are finished so please

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

112 turn in your questionnaire. If you checked any of the activities, please complete the other four columns for each activity you participated in by using the legend on the previous page.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Kind of How Minutes Amount Largest Gambling Activities Activity Often? Spent $ Spent $ Amt. Gambling tickets 1. Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2. Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3. Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g.: break-open, pull- tab, Nevada strips) 4. Raffles or fundraising tickets Bingo 5. Bingo Gambling with family or friends 6. Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money) Electronic gambling 7. Video lottery terminals (VLT's) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8. Casino slot machines 9. Arcade or video games for money 10. Gambling on the Internet Sports betting 11. Sport Select (e.g.: Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12. Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13. Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14. Sports with a bookie Horse racing 15. Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off- track) Casinos 16. Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLT's (e.g.: poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17. Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g.: Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLT’s (e.g.: poker, blackjack, roulette)] Speculative investments 18. Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSP's) Other gambling 19. Games of skill for money (e.g.: pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20. Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21. Any other form of gambling (specify)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

113

6. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

7. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet or spent more money than you wanted to on gambling? Never Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

8. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you needed to gamble with larger amounts of money to get the same feeling of excitement? Never Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

9. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you gone back another day to try to win back the money you lost? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

10. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

11. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

114

12. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling? 0. Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

13. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt like you would like to stop betting money or gambling, but didn’t think you could? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

14. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have people criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether or not you thought it was true? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

15. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

16. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has gambling caused you any health problems, including stress or anxiety? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

17. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has your gambling caused any financial problems for you or your household? Never Sometimes Most of the Time Almost Always Don’t know No response

You have reached the end of the Ottawa Aboriginal Community survey. Thank you!

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

115

Appendix II Focus Group Instrument The different focus groups will discuss questions from each goal that will help people understand the issues of gambling and problem gambling. The facilitator will guide the groups through the meeting by raising questions and topics that will be discussed amongst members of the group.

The following questions will be used as prompts and topics to gather a group perspective on the attitudes, values and perception of gambling and problem gambling. The facilitator will guide the group throughout the discussion, keeping the group on topic and productive, while collecting a broad- based sample of opinions.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question #1 – What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #4 – Where and when do community members gamble? Question #7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question #1 – What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #4 – What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

116

FOCUS GROUP GUIDE TO DISCUSSION

1. What activities do community members define as gambling?

2. What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

3. Where and when do community members gamble?

4. Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

5. What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members?

6. Does problem gambling in North Bay differ from problem gambling in the past?

7. How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

8. What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

9. What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

10. How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

11. What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

117

Appendix III Key Informant Instrument The following questions will be used as topics and prompts to gather data from people that work or are involved in key positions around the area and have access to unique and special knowledge related to the Aboriginal community and gambling.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question #1 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question #2 – How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question #1 – What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 – What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

118

QUESTIONS ASKED OF KEY INFORMANTS: NORTH BAY

1. What activities do community members define as gambling?

2. What is the perceived prevalence/popularity of gambling in the community?

3. Where and when do community members gamble?

4. Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

5. What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members?

6. What do community members define as problem gambling?

7. What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

8. Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

9. Does problem gambling in North Bay differ from problem gambling in the past?

10. How knowledgeable are community members and problem gamblers about problem gambling?

11. How aware or concerned are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

12. What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

13. What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

14. How knowledgeable are community members and problem gamblers about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

15. What are the preferences of community members and problem gamblers for programs and services to help problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the North Bay Aboriginal Community

119

EXAMINING GAMBLING AND PROBLEM GAMBLING IN THE OTTAWA ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY

Prepared for the

OTTAWA LOCAL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Prepared by the

ODAWA NATIVE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE

Charles W. Hill Research Coordinator

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

120

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...... 123

Summary of Findings ...... 123

Summary of Conclusions ...... 124

Recommendation:...... 124

1. INTRODUCTION...... 125

1.1 Community Description ...... 125

1.2 Community Participants ...... 129

2. RESEARCH ...... 129

2.1 Literature Review ...... 129

2.2 Purpose and Goals ...... 129

2.3 Research Questions...... 130

3. METHODS ...... 131

3.1 Community Survey...... 131

3.1.2 Data Collection ...... 133

3.1.3 Data Analysis ...... 134

3.2 Focus Groups...... 134

3.2.1 Sampling ...... 134

3.2.2 Data Collection ...... 135

3.2.3 Data Analysis ...... 135

3.3 Key Informant Interviews...... 135

3.3.1 Sampling ...... 135

3.3.2 Data Collection ...... 135

3.3.3 Data Analysis ...... 135

3.4 Case Studies...... 135

3.4.1 Sampling ...... 135

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

121

3.4.2 Data Collection ...... 136

3.4.3 Data Analysis ...... 136

4. FINDINGS ...... 136

4.1 Goal One...... 136

4.2 Goal Two...... 144

4.3 Goal Three ...... 148

4.4 Goal Four ...... 150

5. CONCLUSIONS...... 154

5.1 Goal One:...... 154

5.2 Goal Two:...... 155

5.3 Goal Three: ...... 155

5.4 Goal Four: ...... 156

Appendix I: Survey Instrument...... 158

Appendix II: Focus Group Instrument ...... 164

Appendix III: Key Informant Instrument...... 169

Appendix IV: Case Study Instrument ...... 170

Appendix V: Case Studies ...... 171

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

122

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 Income in Ottawa-Gatineau...... 127

TABLE 2 Aboriginal Population in Ottawa-Gatineau Area, 2001 Census...... 128

TABLE 3 Type of Gambling Activity...... 137

TABLE 4 Frequency of Activity in the Past Twelve Months, ...... 139

TABLE 5 Money Spent ...... 142

TABLE 6 Persons Completing Survey by Gender and Age...... 143

TABLE 7 Gambling Activity by Gender and Age Groups...... 143

TABLE 8 Gambling Categories...... 145

TABLE 9 Reasons for Gambling...... 153

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

123

ABSTRACT Problem gambling is an emerging public health issue, which is not surprising, given the proliferation of gambling opportunities through casinos, slot machines, VLT’s, bingos, lotteries and sports betting. In recent years, a number of scientific studies have been conducted on this issue, but few have focused specifically on gambling among Aboriginal peoples.

The overall purpose of this research was to provide insight into the nature and practice of gambling as a socio-cultural activity within the Aboriginal community in Ottawa. The research was comprised of four research methods: a community survey, focus group sessions, key informant interviews and problem gambler case studies. Directly related to the goals, the anticipated outcomes for the Ottawa Aboriginal community included the following.

1. To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity; 2. To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community; 3. To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values); 4. To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviors of problem gamblers and concerned significant others; and 5. To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research.

This report contains the findings on which conclusions are based, from which a comprehensive, evidence-based action plan will be developed. The action plan is expected to be developed and implemented in 2005.

Summary of Findings The 2001 Census shows 33,705 Aboriginal persons in Canada's National Capital Region. For the study, we completed 155 Community Surveys, interviewed 16 Key Informants, held 6 Focus Groups and conducted 7 Case Studies.

Respondents defined gambling as taking risks when money is involved

Of the 155 respondents in the Community Survey, 83.2% were First Nations citizens, 12.3% were Métis and 4.5% were Inuit. Overall, 67.7% were female and 32.2% male.

They were largely well-educated, with 122 having post-secondary education: 88 of 122 or 72.1% were female; 34 of 122 or 27.9% were male. Sixty-one (69.3%) of the 88 females, and 18 (52.9%) of the 34 males, have some university or university and professional degrees.

Gambling is perceived as medium-high to high among the various classes of respondent. Most gamble in "legal" locations - ticket booths and kiosks, bingo halls, tele-theatres, etc.

For survey respondents, the first five types of gambling reported in terms of frequency of play were on lottery tickets, break-open tickets, raffles, slots and bingo. Although the frequency was high, the cask expenditure was fairly low for all persons reporting. Significantly larger amounts were spent by each participant on slots and horse racing, albeit by fewer individuals.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

124

The grid below shows the level of risk among the 155 respondents.

Number Percent Not a Gambler or a No-Risk Gambler 103 66.5% Low Risk Gambler 20 12.9% Moderate Risk Gambler 19 12.3% Problem Gambler 13 8.4% Total 155 100%

Problem gambling is defined by the respondents as "continuing to gamble despite persistently negative results". In the survey, the prevalence of problem gambling was found to be 8.4% of the respondents. The 13 problem gamblers are made up of 8 (62%) females and 5 (38%) males.

Even so, respondents did not feel there was any specific social or economic group or gender who gambled or who were problem gamblers.

The respondents agree that problem gambling may result in significant physical, mental, social, psychological, economic and legal problems.

Gamblers are perceived to be aware of, but not very knowledgeable about, community resources such as Gamblers Anonymous, Rehab Centres, and counselling agencies. None of these provides services specifically for Aboriginal persons, despite social and cultural differences.

The majority of those interviewed recommend services for Aboriginals by Aboriginals.

Summary of Conclusions The incidence of gambling among Aboriginal persons in Ottawa is high.

The greatest number of Aboriginal gamblers buys gambling tickets, or play slots and bingo.

The amount of time and money spent by individual participants on the purchase of gambling tickets is low, compared to slots, bingo and other forms of gambling.

The number of problem gamblers among Aboriginal persons in Ottawa is high, especially when compared to the incidence of problem gambling among the general population in Canada.

In the Community Survey, responses show that more females than males identify as problem gamblers.

A counselling program should allow for or provide for gender differences. A service agency or organization set up specifically to provide services to and for Aboriginal problem gamblers would reduce or remove barriers that might occur because of cultural and social differences.

An Aboriginal prevention and education program would likely help to reduce the number of young Aboriginal persons who might fall into problem gambling.

Recommendation: Establish a gambling prevention, education and counselling program for Aboriginal persons, designed, administered and delivered by Aboriginal personnel.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

125

1. INTRODUCTION In countries throughout the world, problem gambling has been acknowledged to be a serious emerging public health issue. An increase in problem gambling is not surprising as during the past decade, there has been a proliferation of gambling opportunities through casinos, electronic gambling machines, mega-bingo facilities, lotteries, sports betting, simulcast racing and Internet gambling.

At the same time, there has been a significant growth in problem gambling research as shown by the increasing number of scientific studies and articles in this field. Within this body of research, a large number of studies on gambling have been conducted in Canada, the United States, New Zealand, Australia, Great Britain and Europe. By and large, these studies on the prevalence of gambling have focused on problems within the general population. Very few studies have focused on this issue in relation to poverty, isolation and cross addictions among Aboriginal peoples.

In view of this fact, there has been increasing interest in studies that address problem gambling in Aboriginal communities. This research project was developed to contribute to our understanding of how gambling and problem gambling impacts on Aboriginal communities, and how gambling may be viewed differently in various Aboriginal populations.

In this context, five diverse Aboriginal communities were selected for inclusion in this study. The communities differed in terms of demographics, including population size, geographic location, economics and social structures, but there were a number of social areas common to all, including a significant Aboriginal population. With regard to gambling and problem gambling, specific research was carried out in each of the five communities under the guidance of respective Local Research Advisory Committees. In each community, the final report was intended to provide a framework on which to base a plan for action at the community level to address issues relating to gambling and problem gambling. The five respective research reports will be then rendered into one final summary report by the investigators.

One key concept that was recognized in such a study is cultural diversity and cultural differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations, and among different Aboriginal groups. These differences may impact upon the perception of what constitutes “problem gambling”, and upon the processes and programs intended to prevent problem gambling, to educate people about the problem, and to provide treatment to help persons overcome or deal with their problems.

In summary, this research was designed to increase our knowledge of gambling and problem gambling in Aboriginal communities and to provide a culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies for participating communities to address this serious public health issue. The following subsections provide the community description and community participants.

1.1 Community Description General Population

The Greater Ottawa area, according to the latest Census (2001), had a population of approximately 753,000 persons of all ethnic backgrounds, other than Aboriginal persons. The National Capital Region (NCR) includes the City of Gatineau, which brought an additional population of approximately 245,000 non-Aboriginal persons.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

126

Aboriginal Population

According to that (2001) Census, the Aboriginal populations in the two cities were 22,275 and 11,430 respectively, for a total Aboriginal population of approximately 33,705 in the NCR.

The two cities sprang up at the confluence of the Ottawa and Gatineau Rivers, which has long been a major trading center among the original peoples. Indeed, the name “Ottawa” is derived from the Algonquian word Odawa, which signifies “traders”. Over the millennia, this trading area was occupied at different times by different nations – Algonquin, Mohawk and of course the Odawa proper.

Today, there are still many persons from these nations who are living in and around Ottawa-Gatineau, but there are also citizens from other Aboriginal nations. Among the 34,000 Aboriginal persons indicated in the census are persons from a wide variety of nations, including the Cree, Ojibway, Pottawatami, Saulteaux, Abenaki, Delaware, Mi’kmaq, Attikamek, Malecite, Nishga, Shuswap, Carrier, Gwitchen, Dene, Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca, Blood, Siksika and Inuit nations, in addition to the Métis.

Economic Activity and Income Levels

The increased flow of Aboriginal persons to Ottawa from all areas of Canada began after the release of the infamous federal “White Paper” of 1969, when unified resistance to outright assimilation led to the development and increased prominence of organizations such as the National Indian Brotherhood (now the Assembly of First Nations) and the Native Council of Canada, forerunner of the current Métis National Council and the Congress of Aboriginal People, both of which maintain their headquarters in Ottawa.

In addition to increased political awareness, the doors began to open slowly for increased employment of Aboriginal persons within the federal public service. After a slow beginning in the 1970’s, several thousand Aboriginal persons are now employed in the federal public service. As of March 31, 2002, figures issued by the federal government indicate there were 5,980 Aboriginal federal public servants across Canada, 1,850 of who work in the National Capital Region.

These employees were concentrated in a relatively few departments; 65% of all Aboriginal employees work in the combined departments of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, the Correctional Service of Canada, HRDC, Health Canada and the Department of National Defense in decreasing numbers. The remaining 35% of Aboriginal federal public servants are scattered among the remaining 63 departments and agencies. The majority of the Aboriginal employees are in relatively low positions. With regard to income, about 1/3 of all Aboriginal federal public servants make under $40,000, almost 1/2 make under $45,000; almost 2/3 make under $50,000.

Outside of figures relating to government-based employment, we do not have information about the actual number of Aboriginal persons employed at the local level in the general economic sector, nor of the numbers on social assistance. However, the 2001 Census Aboriginal Population Profile indicated the following income characteristics for the “Aboriginal Identity” in the Ottawa-Gatineau area.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

127

TABLE 1 Income in Ottawa-Gatineau

Income Characteristics Ottawa-Gatineau Number of Persons 15 years of age and older with income 10,140 Median Total Income of persons 15 years of age and over $22,928 Composition of Total Income (100%): Earnings as % of income 83.0% Government Transfer as % of income 10.6% Other Money as % of income 06.4%

Housing and Homelessness

From the foregoing, we might conclude that many persons do not have a high income. This may be reflected in the percentage of homeless Aboriginal men, which exceeds 15% of all homeless men, whereas the entire Aboriginal population comprises only 3.2% of the general population.

With regard to housing, there are two social housing organizations dedicated to Aboriginal persons in Ottawa and Vanier (an Ottawa suburb now part of Greater Ottawa), one of which has 167 living units and a waiting list of some 700 families. The other organization serves the Inuit population and has 63 housing units, with 30 to 40 families on the waiting list at all times.

Aboriginal Support Groups

There are, however, a large number of organizations operated by Aboriginal persons which have been set up to provide a range of social, health, training and referral services for Aboriginal persons in the NCR. At the present time, there are some 40 Aboriginal organizations, 10 of which are run by and provide services for the Inuit.

The foregoing shows that the Aboriginal population in Ottawa-Gatineau has access to a wide range of personal and social services, either directly or by referral. In addition, there are a number of events based on and incorporating traditional Aboriginal activities, such as an annual outdoor Pow Wow, now in its 29th year, a Children’s Pow Wow, held each year before Christmas, and a mid-Winter festival held between Christmas and New Year’s Day. These events are organized by the Odawa Native Friendship Centre (ONFC) and complement activities that take place in other locations such as the Wabano Aboriginal Health Centre, where a Strawberry Tea is held every June.

At the ONFC, there is also a number of social events offered, such as community lunches once a week. In addition, there is a Healing Lodge at the ONFC and at Wabano, as well as at Indian and Northern Affairs (in Gatineau) and at Health Canada (Tunney’s Pasture Complex).

There is also a range of typically non-Native social and cultural events that take place at the National Arts Centre, the Museum of Civilization and the National Art Gallery, as well as in other locations around the cities. These are complemented by a range of trade shows and organized events such as an annual International (Hot Air) Balloon Festival.

With regard to recreation, Ottawa has a National Hockey League team which plays at fairly new arena about 15 miles from the Ottawa City Centre. The Aboriginal community likewise has organized hockey, bowling, volleyball and softball teams, which play at various locations around the city.

In the area there are also a large number of elementary and secondary schools to serve the general population. At the post-secondary level, there are three universities – Carleton University and the

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

128

University of Ottawa on the Ontario side, and the University of Quebec in Gatineau across the Ottawa River. There are a number of community colleges (CEGEP’s) in Quebec, and the Algonquin Community College in Ottawa. At each of the universities in Ottawa and at Algonquin College, there are internal student-body organizations made up of Aboriginal students.

Opportunities for Gambling

With regard to opportunities for gambling in the NCR, there is a very large, full-fledged casino located in Gatineau and a smaller “Charity Casino”, with slot machines only, at the Rideau-Carleton Raceway just south of Ottawa. At the Raceway, one can also gamble on the horse races, both on live on-track races and on off-track races through satellite transmission. Off-track betting is also available at one location near downtown Ottawa and at one in Vanier. In the province of Quebec, there is also a horse race track and a number of slot machines in Aylmer (Gatineau). Video Lottery Terminals (VLT’s) are also readily accessible in taverns and bars, among other locations, on the Quebec side.

There are 7 licensed major commercial bingo halls in Ottawa. However, there are a large number of smaller bingos run by churches, service organizations and some charity groups, which operate on a permit system instead of licensing. There is also numerous lottery ticket and scratch and win ticket outlets in small stores, supermarkets and in the malls. Officially licensed raffles also operate in the area. Sports betting may be conducted at these officially sanctioned lottery-ticket sales booths scattered throughout the city, including at the sites indicated above.

In addition to the above, there are off-track betting outlets in a number of the smaller towns within 100 km. of Ottawa, as well as a major casino and a gigantic bingo hall on an Indian Reserve near Cornwall, Ontario at Akwesasne, a Mohawk Reservation which lies in three jurisdictions – New York, Ontario and Quebec. For persons who want to go a little further afield, there is also a large, full- fledged casino in Montreal, about 200 kilometres east of Ottawa. About 160 kilometres to the southwest, there is another large “charity” casino at Gananoque (near Kingston), Ontario.

We do not have any information on the degree of activity or location of private and/or illicit gambling venues in the two cities, which might include card playing, wagering on the outcomes of games, pool room betting or un-licensed raffles and sports-pool betting.

TABLE 2 Aboriginal Population in Ottawa-Gatineau Area, 2001 Census

Ottawa Male Female Total - Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal population 795,250 389,310 405,940 Total Aboriginal origins population 22,275 10,350 11,925 ƒ North American Indian single origin 2,100 920 1,180 ƒ North American Indian & Non-Aboriginal origins 14,525 6,845 7,680 ƒ Métis single origin 485 265 220 ƒ Métis and non-Aboriginal origins 4,095 1,835 2,260 ƒ Inuit single origin 270 130 140 ƒ Inuit and non-Aboriginal origins 355 175 180 ƒ Other Aboriginal multiple origins 445 180 265 Total non-Aboriginal population 772,975 378,955 394,020

Gatineau Male Female Total - Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal population 255,505 124,650 130,855 Total Aboriginal origins population 11,430 5,405 6,025 ƒ North American Indian single origin 1,735 930 805 ƒ North American Indian and non-Aboriginal origins 6,880 3,165 3,715

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

129

Gatineau Male Female ƒ Métis single origin 545 250 295 ƒ Métis and non-Aboriginal origins 2,025 940 1,085 ƒ Inuit single origin 10 5 5 ƒ Inuit and non-Aboriginal origins 115 55 60 ƒ Other Aboriginal multiple origins 120 60 60 Total non-Aboriginal population 244,075 119,245 124,830

TOTALS IN BOTH OTTAWA AND GATINEAU Male Female Total - Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal population 1,050,755 513,960 536,795 Total Aboriginal origins population 33,705 15,755 17,950 ƒ North American Indian single origin 3,835 1,850 1,985 ƒ North American Indian and non-Aboriginal origins 21,405 10,010 11,395 ƒ Métis single origin 1,030 515 515 ƒ Métis and non-Aboriginal origins 6,120 2,775 3,345 ƒ Inuit single origin 280 135 145 ƒ Inuit and non-Aboriginal origins 470 230 240 ƒ Other Aboriginal multiple origins 565 240 325 Total non-Aboriginal population 1,017,050 498,205 518,845

1.2 Community Participants The project was sponsored locally by the Odawa Native Friendship Centre (ONFC), located at 12 Stirling Avenue in Ottawa, and operates under the direction of a Local Research Advisory Committee (LRAC).

The LRAC included representatives from the following organizations and firms in Ottawa:

Odawa Native Friendship Centre Tungasuvvingat Inuit (Inuit Friendship Centre) Gignul Non-Profit Housing Corporation Residential School Healing Centre Wabano Centre for Aboriginal Health University of Ottawa Spirit Creative *

*Please note that the last participant listed is an Aboriginal-owned private company.

2. RESEARCH

2.1 Literature Review A number of books, reports and articles were assembled and read, but there was not an in-depth analysis of their content. 2.2 Purpose and Goals The overall purpose of this research was to provide insight into the nature and practice of gambling as a socio-cultural activity within the Aboriginal community in Ottawa.

Within this broad statement of purpose, the five major goals for the research project were to:

1. describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

130

2. describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community. 3. ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values). 4. ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviors of problem gamblers and concerned significant others. 5. develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research.

2.3 Research Questions The specific research questions developed for each goal of the research project were as follows.

GOAL ONE:

To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Research Questions:

Question #1: What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in? Question #4: Where and when do community members gamble? Question #5: How frequently, and for how long/session, do community members gamble? Question #6: How much money do community members spend on gambling? Question #7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in Ottawa?

GOAL TWO:

To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Research Questions: Question #1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question #4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6: Does problem gambling in Ottawa differ from problem gambling in the past?

GOAL THREE:

To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Research Questions:

Question #1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

131

Question #2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

GOAL FOUR:

To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Research Questions:

Question #1 What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

A long term goal is to develop and implement an Action Plan to prevent and address Aboriginal problem gambling, in cooperation with members of the community and the continued guidance of the LRAC.

3. METHODS The research methods for the project included a community survey, focus group sessions, key informant interviews and case studies of problem gamblers or former problem gamblers.

As an initial step to publicize our project and to provide prospective respondents with information about the work we would be doing in the Ottawa area, we prepared a brochure indicating the purpose and objectives of the study. To develop interest, and to stimulate discussion and involvement, the brochure contained a nine-item checklist that individuals could complete if they wanted to assess their own proclivity for gambling and/or the possibility of falling into problem gambling.

The brochure also included our contact numbers if a person wanted to participate in any of the data- collection activities, as well as the numbers for Gamblers Anonymous and several other help groups.

3.1 Community Survey A community survey was taken to gauge the extent of gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal persons in and around Ottawa.

3.1.1 Sampling We surveyed 155 Aboriginal persons: Indian, Inuit and Métis.

An attempt was made to stratify responses according to age and gender, and effort was be made to strike a balance between the number of male and female respondents. Although we were able to divide respondents into three age categories, we were not able to survey equal numbers of males and females.

We prepared a list of community events where a survey might be administered and arranged for us to be on site and to ask persons to complete the survey. We selected the sample as a matter of convenience, asking persons attending the Aboriginal community events (e.g., pow wows) to complete the survey.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

132

Persons completing the questionnaire were offered a $1.00 chit toward a coffee or food at the Friendship Centre to acknowledge their input and time, and thank them for completing the survey.

In addition, two Aboriginal organizations in Ottawa were asked to have some of their respective clients complete the survey. No monetary incentive was offered in the latter case.

The data collected in the survey we conducted were entered into a computer software program developed to assist with data analysis. Much of the data presented herein was analyzed with the use of that tool. The survey instrument contained questions pertaining to Aboriginal ancestry, education levels and income. To establish the demographic parameters, we present below information relevant to these items.

Ancestry of Respondents by Gender

NATION Gender Total Percent Female Male Algonquin 21 10 31 20.0% Ojibway 20 9 29 18.7% Cree 20 9 29 18.7% Mohawk 11 9 20 12.9% Mi’gmaq 5 2 7 4.5% Saulteau 3 0 3 1.9% Huron 2 0 2 1.3% Odawa 1 1 2 1.3% Sioux 1 1 2 1.3% Carrier 0 1 1 .6% Oneida 0 1 1 .6% Pottowatami 0 1 1 .6% Tsimshian 0 1 1 .6% Total First Nations 84 45 129 83.2% Métis 17 2 19 12.3% Inuit 4 3 7 4.5% Totals 105 50 155 100.00%

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

133

Levels of Education

Type of education Gender Total Female Male Some Elementary 3 1 4 Some High/Junior High School 4 9 13 Completed High School 10 6 16 Some Community College 8 6 14 Some Technical School 1 3 4 Completed Community College 17 5 22 Completed Technical School 1 2 3 Some University 26 10 36 Completed BA 21 6 27 Completed MA 8 0 8 Professional Degree 6 2 8 Total 105 50 155

The reported mean household income before taxes was $51,175 in the last year. This may be skewed by the fact that eleven (11) respondents indicated a household income of $100,000 and up, with the maximum being $250,000.

3.1.2 Data Collection We prepared a survey instrument to be completed by Aboriginal persons willing to participate in the survey. A cover note was distributed with each questionnaire, explaining the purpose of the exercise, and reassuring potential respondents that their confidentiality would be respected.

The first section of the survey instrument requested demographic information of the respondent. Survey participants were then asked to respond to 17 questions, which were basically the same as the first 17 questions contained in the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (see the survey instrument in Appendix I).

A numbering system to ensure confidentiality was devised and maintained to track respondents who were willing to participate in case studies and who had placed their names on the questionnaires for follow up.

Dr. Harold Wynne, an internationally recognized authority on gambling and problem gambling who is currently a professor at the University of Alberta- Edmonton, developed an instrument, called the Problem Gamblers Severity Index (PGSI), to assess the degree of severity of a person’s gambling. The PGSI contains 17 questions, the first 5 of which relate to the kind of gambling activity, frequency, duration and money spent, while the remaining 12 questions are used to assess the level of severity.

Our survey questionnaire included the 17 questions contained in the PGSI. Analysis of the first 5 yielded information about the nature and extent of a person’s gambling; the nine (9) questions from 6 to 17 were used to assess the impact of gambling on a person, asking about how a person felt the results of gambling, and how often these feelings arose. Each of the 9 questions were scored as follows:

Never = 0 Sometimes = 1 Most of the time = 2

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

134

Almost always = 3

A score from 0 to 27 is possible. For example, if a person never gambled, the overall score would be “0”; if a person checked off the category “sometimes” to 2 questions, the person’s total score would be 2, and s/he would be classified as a “Low Risk” sub-type, as shown on the chart below; if a person checked off “Most of the time” to 6 of the questions, the person’s score would be 12, and s/he would fall into the “Problem Gambler” sub-type; etc.

The PGSI classification of gambler sub-types is as follows:

0 = Not a Gambler or a Non-problem Gambler 1-2 = Low-risk Gambler 3-7 = Moderate-risk Gambler 8+ = Problem Gambler

The cumulative scores for each respondent were then renamed and collapsed into four (4) categories consistent with the above, for ease of scoring, so we wound up with the following categories:

0 = Not a Gambler or a Non-problem Gambler 1 = Low-risk Gambler 2 = Moderate-risk Gambler 3 = Problem Gambler

The number of persons in each category is presented in the findings section of this report.

3.1.3 Data Analysis This information was used to develop a quantitative database upon which findings of the research project were articulated. We entered information from the data survey form into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software program.

The SPSS was used to compile and analyze the data and to generate descriptive statistics (e.g. frequencies, averages and percentages, etc.) and tables that were incorporated into this report.

3.2 Focus Groups Members of the focus groups were selected from persons in the Aboriginal community-at-large in and around Ottawa. Among a number of other discussion topics, members of each focus group were asked to contribute to a definition of gambling and associated problems, from their perspective.

3.2.1 Sampling LRAC members and Executive Directors of Aboriginal organizations were asked to recommend participants for the six focus groups. We set up six (6) focus groups, and tried to have two (2) for each of the three (3) age groups shown here, namely, 18 to 25 years, 26 to 55 years, and 56 years and over. However, it was not possible to attain this, although one group was made up of youth (under 25 years), and one was made up of senior citizens. For the other four groups, the ages ranged from 20 to 60 years.

Each focus group was made up of male and female respondents, and the groups ranged in size from 4 to 7 persons. Male and female participated about equally.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

135

3.2.2 Data Collection We prepared a guide to facilitate discussion and ensure key points are covered off during the focus group (see discussion guide in Appendix II).

We selected a facilitator to lead discussions and a recorder to track items discussed.

We determined times and dates and arranged locations for meetings of each focus group and informed those who indicated they would participate in the respective groups.

With the written agreement of the participants, we recorded on tape and in writing the responses and comments of the participants.

3.2.3 Data Analysis This analysis was qualitative in nature, and we produced written summaries of the tapes and notes. We conducted a content analysis to identify themes relating to attitudes and issues raised or identified in the focus groups, and the findings are contained in this report.

3.3 Key Informant Interviews Sixteen Key Informant interviews were held to obtain the opinions of knowledgeable persons about gambling and problem gambling among Aboriginal persons in the Ottawa area.

3.3.1 Sampling To facilitate the selection of respondents, we prepared a list of all the Aboriginal organizations in the Ottawa area and selected respondents from this list in a random fashion.

We asked the Executive Directors of these Aboriginal organizations if they or their representative would be willing to be interviewed, in order to be able to conduct at least 15 interviews. For each key informant willing to respond, we identified a time, place and date for a private interview.

3.3.2 Data Collection We developed an interview guide (see Appendix III) for use during an interview with the key informants and the Research Assistant used the guide to interview them. Responses were recorded on tape and in writing, after each of the respondents agreed to this in writing.

3.3.3 Data Analysis We summarized the information contained in the tapes and notes. The qualitative data contained in the summaries were used to identify common themes and issues.

3.4 Case Studies Case studies were used to obtain the views and opinions of people who actually have or have had gambling problems.

3.4.1 Sampling We interviewed seven (7) self-identified problem gamblers who were willing to speak about their gambling-related problems. Recruitment of respondents was done through an invitation at the end of

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

136 the survey questionnaire, which asked problem gamblers to advise the Research Coordinator if they were willing to participate.

We tried to divide the sample evenly between male and female, and to get one person from each of the three age groups, above. We had a balance of male and female, but were unable to categorize the respondents by age.

3.4.2 Data Collection The four-component interview guide (see Appendix IV) contained questions and prompts to be used to ensure that each problem gambler case study interview and it addressed the following four components.

a. Case history; b. Gambling history; c. Problem gambling description; and d. Help-seeking recommendations.

Based on the four components, we prepared an interview guide to be followed to obtain relevant information from the respondent (see Appendix IV). We scheduled interviews with each respondent, with sufficient times allocated to ensure that the case is thoroughly examined. We interviewed each participant and recorded their responses after they had given their consent in writing.

3.4.3 Data Analysis The qualitative data obtained through the case study interviews were written up as short summaries, which are presented in this report (see Appendix V).

4. FINDINGS

4.1 Goal One To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Key Informants: From the responses from the sixteen persons who were interviewed, a definition for gambling was derived. The Key Informants defined gambling as taking risks when money is involved.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

The prevalence of gambling in the community as reported on the Surveys shows the purchase of Lottery, Scratch 'n' Win and Raffle Tickets, and the play of Bingo and Slots are the most frequent types of gambling. The participation of both female and male gamblers is high, being from 65% to 72% for Lottery Tickets, 43% and 46% for instant win, and 41% and 38% for raffles; female players are in the majority with regard to Bingo (30% to 14%) and Slots (41% to 32%).

Focus Groups: The Focus Groups were asked how much gambling they thought is done by Aboriginal persons. Five of the six (5 of 6) groups indicated they thought there was a “high” level of gambling among the

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

137

Aboriginal population in Ottawa-Gatineau, while the remaining group thought it was of a “medium” level.

Key Informants: Seven (7) of the key informants perceived the prevalence of gambling to be of a “medium” level and seven (7) perceived it to be “high”. Two persons gave “no response”.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Community Survey: The vast majority of activity focused on lottery and “scratch ‘n’ win” tickets, followed closely by the playing of slot machines. The exception here is play of daily lotteries; only 11 persons or 7% of the respondents indicated they participate in this activity. Bingo, however, did not place as high as had been anticipated by the researchers, with only 25% of the 155 respondents indicating that they play Bingo. The “lowest score” was yielded with regard to gambling on the Internet, where no one checked this off. Arcades, horse races, pools, stocks and sports betting also "scored low", and only one person indicated he or she placed bets with a bookie. Table 3 below shows the primary activities that were indicated.

TABLE 3 Type of Gambling Activity

TYPE OF GAMBLING ACTIVITY - PAST 12 MONTHS (% OUT OF 155) RANK ACTIVITY NUMBER PERCENT ORDER

Lotteries 104 67% 1 Scratch & Win 68 44% 2 Raffles 62 40% 3 Slots 59 38% 4 Bingo 38 25% 5 Cards 26 17% 6 Provincial Casino 22 14% 7 Video Lottery Terminals 20 13% 8 Games of Skill 18 12% 9 Other Casinos 14 9% 10 Daily Lotteries 11 7% 11 Horses 10 6% 12 Non-regulated Games 10 6% 13 Pools 9 6% 14 Proline 5 3% 15 Stocks 5 3% 16 Sports 4 3% 17 Other 4 3% 18 Arcades 3 1% 19 Bookies 1 0.50% 20 Internet 0 0% 21

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

138

Graphic Representation Of Table 3

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Focus Groups: The Focus Groups thought the location for gambling activities would include bingo halls, then casinos, racetracks, hotel rooms, then lottery booths, in that order.

The Focus Groups thought people gamble basically anytime, but mentioned specifically “when cheques come in” or when “there is cash on hand”. They also mentioned people gamble on special occasions and in the evenings.

Key Informants: The Key Informants indicated that they think persons gamble at the end of the month when social assistance or pension cheques come in, or any time that money is available.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long per session, do community members gamble?

Community Survey: The following is a summary of the frequency of play and length of gambling sessions as shown in Table 4 below.

Gambling Tickets: For lottery tickets, only 10 spent more than 15 minutes; 55 spent 1 to 10 minutes. For Scratch & Win tickets, 15 persons indicated they spent 5 minutes or less, and for raffles, the majority spent less than 5 minutes.

Bingo: The majority of players spent 2 hours or more.

Family & Friends: The 13 respondents spent from 30 minutes to 5 hours on this.

Electronic Gambling: All of the 8 persons who played VLT’s indicated they spent more than 1 hour to a maximum of 4 hours on this activity. On the slots, the majority spent from 30 minutes to 2 hours, and 5 said they spent more than 4 hours.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

139

Sports Betting: The 4 people answering said they spent 5 minutes or less on this. For pools, 3 spent less than 20 minutes, although 1 said s/he spent 2 hours on this. There was no response to “betting on outcomes of sports events”, and the one person said s/he spent 20 minutes per session with a bookie.

Horse Racing: The five respondents here said they spent 2 to 5 hours on the races.

Casinos: The few who responded (6 at provincial casinos and 4 at other casinos) reported they spent from 2 to 3 hours at either type of casino.

Spec. Investments: Only 3 indicated they spent time on this, but one of them reported 8 hours.

Other Gambling: Only 9 responded to “games of skill”, of whom 5 said they spent 1 to 6 hours. The two who responded to “card games in non-regulated setting” said they spent 2 hours on this.

TABLE 4 Frequency of Activity in the Past Twelve Months, N = 155

Type of Gambling How Often? 2-6 x Once a 2-3 x Once a 6-11x 1-5 x Week Week Month Month Year Year Totals 1. Lottery Tickets 18 15 16 15 7 20 93 2. Daily Lottery Tickets 2 1 1 0 1 0 6 3. Instant Wind or Scratch Tickets 9 6 10 13 5 11 54 4. Raffles or Fundraising 7 6 10 8 4 10 45 5. Bingo 5 4 6 4 3 6 28 6. Cards/Games with 1 3 4 4 0 3 15 Friends/Family 7. Video Lottery Terminals 2 3 2 4 0 3 14 8. Casino Slot Machines 8 5 7 8 5 11 44 9. Arcade/Video Games for Money 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10. Internet Gambling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11. Sports Select (Proline) 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 12. Sports Pools 1 1 1 2 0 1 6 13. Gamble on Sporting Events 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 14. Sports with a Bookie 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 15. Horse Races 2 2 1 1 0 1 7 16. Games at Provincial Casinos 2 2 6 3 3 1 17 17. Games at Casinos Out-of- 3 1 1 2 0 2 9 Province 18. Stocks/Options/Commodities 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 19. Games of Skill for Money 1 2 1 4 1 2 11 20. Non-Regulated Card Games 2 1 1 1 0 1 6 21. Other form of Gambling 0 0 0 1 1 1 3

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

The following is a summary of the information presented in Table 5 below.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

140

Gambling Tickets: Of the 83 who responded, 40 spent less than $5 (16 spent $5), 23 spent from $6 to $10 (18 spent $10), and 12 spent from $11 to $20 (6 spent $20). In total, 75 persons spent $20 or less. One person reported spending $100.

Three (3) persons reported spending $10 on daily lottery tickets.

Of the 50 who reported on “scratch & win” tickets, 22 spent $5 or less; 12 spent $10 and 8 spent $20. One each reported spending $25, $40 and $60; 2 spent $30.

For raffles, 14 spent less than $5, 13 spent $10, 2 spent $15 and 5 report spending $20. For larger amounts, 2 spent $30 and 3 spent $50; 1 each spent $25, $80, and $100.

Bingo: Of the 26 reporting on bingo, 2 reported spending less than $20, and 7 reported spending $20. Two spent $30 and 1 spent $35. Three spent $40, and 4 each spent $50 and $60. One reported spending $290.

Family & Friends: Seven spent less than $10, 1 spent $15, 3 spent $20, and 2 spent $50 on card games with family and friends.

Electronic Gambling: For VLTs, of the 14 persons responding, 4 spent $15 or less, 4 spent $20, 2 spent $60, and one each reported spending $40, $50, $125 and $2000.

Of 55 reporting on slots, 16 spent $20, 9 spent $40, 5 each spent $50 and $60; 4 spent $100, two $200, and 1 each $250, $400, $1000 and $ 3000.

Only 3 reported on the arcade: 1 spent $1 and two, $20 each.

The one respondent reported spending $100 on Internet gambling.

Sports Betting: Each of four respondents spent $2, $5, $7, and $1000, respectively on Proline, etc.

For pools, the 8 respondents all spent $20 or less - 3 spent $5 and 3 spent $20.

For the 5 who bet on sports games, 1 spent $2, 1 spent $10, two spent $20 and one, $150.

Of the 2 who used a bookie, 1 spent $5000, while 1 spent only $3.

Horse Racing: One each spent $5, 10, 15, 40, 80, 100 and $1000.

Casinos: Of the 16 responding to “provincial casinos”, 1 each reported spending $15, 30, 200, 1000 and $2000; 2 each reported $20, 40, 50 and $100; 3 spent $60.

For “other casinos”, the 12 respondents reported 1 each spending $40, 50, 80, 200, 1000 and $10000. Three each reported spending $20 and 100.

Spec. Investments: Of the 4 respondents here, 2 spent $100 and 1 each spent $360 and $500.

Other Gambling: For games of skill, 1 each reports $1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 30, 99, and $200; 2 report $20 and 3, $100.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

141

Of the 5 involved with non-regulated play, one each spent $1, 4, 20, and $50.

Of the 2 respondents for “other”, 1 spent $5 and 1 spent $10

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

142

TABLE 5 Money Spent Number of Persons Reporting Expenditure Amt. Lot DLot Scrt Raffl Bing Card VLT Slot Arcd Intn Prol Pool Spor Book Race Pcas Ocaz Stok Skil Nreg Othr Tot Amt. $00 72 151 105 113 129 141 141 100 152 154 151 147 150 153 148 139 143 151 142 150 153 X $00

$1 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 $1 $2 9 7 5 1 1 1 1 1 26 $2 $3 6 2 3 1 1 13 $3 $4 5 1 1 1 1 9 $4 $5 16 9 4 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 40 $5 $6 1 1 2 $6 $7 2 1 3 $7 $8 2 1 3 $8 $9 0 $9 $10 18 3 12 13 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 57 $10 $11 1 1 $11 $12 1 1 $12 $13 0 $13 $14 0 $14 $15 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 $15 $16 0 $16 $17 0 $17 $18 1 1 2 $18 $19 0 $19 $20 6 8 5 7 3 4 16 2 3 2 2 3 3 1 65 $20 $25 2 1 1 1 1 6 $25 $30 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 11 $30 $35 1 1 $35 $40 3 1 3 1 9 1 2 1 21 $40 $45 0 $45 $50 3 4 2 1 5 2 1 1 19 $50 $60 1 5 2 5 3 16 $60 $70 0 $70 $80 1 1 1 3 $80 $90 0 $90 $100 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 2 3 19 $100 $200 3 1 1 1 1 7 $200 $300 1 1 2 $300 $400 1 1 2 $400 $500 1 1 $500 $600 0 $600 $700 0 $700 $800 0 $800 $900 0 $900

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

143

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey: Each respondent to the survey was asked to indicate his/her age and gender so we could determine categories of persons who gamble. The number of persons who completed the survey is shown in Table 6. The 105 females constituted 67.7% of the total number of respondents while the males made up 32.3%. Information compiled from their responses is shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE 6 Persons Completing Survey by Gender and Age

Age Categories & Percentage of Total Gender Gender Total 18-25 % 26-55 % 55+ % N Female 14 13.3 83 79.0 8 7.6 105 Male 9 18.0 36 72.0 5 10.0 50 Totals 23 14.8 119 76.8 13 8.4 155

TABLE 7 Gambling Activity by Gender and Age Groups

FEMALE (N=105) MALE (N=50) Gambling Activity Age Categories Age Categories (Spent Money On:) 18-25 26-55 55+ Total % 18-25 26-55 55+ Total % Lotteries 7 57 4 68 65% 8 24 4 36 72% Daily Lotteries 1 5 0 6 6% 1 2 2 5 10% Scratch n’ Win 7 35 3 45 43% 7 13 3 23 46% Raffles 6 34 3 43 41% 1 15 3 19 38% Bingo 4 23 4 31 30% 0 5 2 7 14% Cards 2 14 1 17 16% 2 6 1 9 18% VLTs 2 9 0 11 10% 2 6 1 9 18% Slots 7 34 2 43 41% 4 11 1 16 32% Arcades 0 1 0 1 1% 2 0 0 2 4% Internet 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% Pro Line 1 1 0 2 2% 2 1 0 3 6% Pools 0 4 0 4 4% 2 3 0 5 10% Sports Bets 1 1 0 2 2% 1 1 0 2 4% Bookie 0 0 0 0 0% 0 1 0 1 2% Horses 1 5 0 6 6% 1 1 2 4 8% Provincial Casino 0 10 1 11 10% 2 7 2 11 22% Other Casino 1 8 0 9 9% 0 4 1 5 10%

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

144

Stock 0 4 0 4 4% 0 1 0 1 2% Games of Skill 2 5 0 7 7% 4 6 1 11 22% Non Regulated 1 1 1 3 3% 2 5 0 7 14% Other 1 1 1 3 3% 1 0 1 2 4%

The percentage calculations show that almost equal numbers of men and women participate in the purchase of Gambling Tickets, even with regard to the fact that the purchase of Daily Lottery Tickets is very low for both genders.

A significant difference exists between the two genders, however, with regard to Bingo, where almost twice as many females as males play this game based on percentages.

On the other hand, a greater percentage of males gamble on VLT’s, Office Pools, games at Provincial Casinos (other than slots), Games of Skill and Non-Regulated gambling.

Focus Groups: The Focus Group members said they do not think that any one class of persons or gender gambles any more than another.

Key Informants: The Key Informants said they think that gamblers come from all walks of life, age, gender and economic levels.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in Ottawa?

Focus Groups: The perception of the Focus Groups was that traditional gaming has not had and does not now have any great impact on present-day gambling among the Aboriginal population.

Key Informants: The key informants spoke only of contemporary games, namely bingo and cards, as the “traditional games” that come to mind.

4.2 Goal Two To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Focus Groups: There was no clear definition of what constitutes “problem gambling”, but group members made several statements, which confirm they have a fairly good understanding of what problem gambling is. These statements include:

“when gambling takes precedence over everything else”; “losing a lot of money and then making excuses afterward”; “not having enough money for essentials (because of gambling)”; “an excess of gambling until you lose all your possessions”.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

145

A statement provided by one of the groups sums up these views quite well. The group said that “continuing to gamble despite persistently negative results” constitutes problem gambling in their view.

Key Informants: Comments from Key Informants about what they consider problem gambling included the following:

“they are people who lose everything they have”; “they won’t leave a gambling site until all their money is gone or the place closes”; “they spend all of the cheque they get at the end of the month”; “even seniors spend half their (pension) cheques when the cheques arrive”.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Community Survey: From non-random sample in the community survey, the “suggested” prevalence of problem gambling was found to be 8.4% of the respondents. All categories of gambling are shown in Table 8.

The 13 problem gamblers are made up of eight (8) females and five (5) males. In terms of percentages, females make up 62% of the problem gamblers while men make up the remaining 38%.

TABLE 8 Gambling Categories

Frequency Percent Not a Gambler or a No-Risk Gambler 103 66.5 Low Risk Gambler 20 12.9 Moderate Risk Gambler 19 12.3 Problem Gambler 13 8.4 Total 155 100.0

GRAPHIC RESPRESENTATION OF TABLE 8

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

146

Focus Groups: The Focus Groups thought there was a lot of problem gambling among Aboriginal persons in the Ottawa-Gatineau area, although the Focus Group made up of youth said they thought the level of “perceived” prevalence was “medium”.

Key Informants: Six Key Informants thought that problem gambling was high, while four (4) thought there was a “medium” problem and four (4) thought there was a “low” problem.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups: Comments made by these groups include the following:

“Problem gamblers … spend all their money; do not pay their bills; resort to dishonesty; become depressed; suffer from stress and depression”.

Key Informants: The Key Informants said problem gamblers sell or pawn their belongings, and may resort to theft and fraud, or other criminal activity such as prostitution to get money to gamble.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Focus Groups: For the individual, the negative consequences discussed during the focus groups might be categorized as:

Emotional Physical Mental (psychological), and Social

All of these are of course related and interrelated, but underlying the above are financial and legal consequences as a result of problem gambling.

Collectively, the Focus Groups raised the following in relation to each category:

Emotional: Regret Remorse Shame Loss of self-respect Guilt Stress Unhappiness Physical: Poor Health Suicide Aggression

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

147

Violence Psychological: Depression Delusions (of “winning big”) Thoughts of suicide Blaming others Denial (of a problem)

Social: Loss of respect (from others) Abuse of others (physical and mental abuse) Avoidance (of people by the gambler; e.g.: those s/he owes money) Avoidance (of the gambler, by people who recognize the person has a problem) Loss of family and friends Criminal activity (e.g.: prostitution, sale of illegal drugs, theft, robbery, fraud ..)

Financial consequences include:

Loss of money Loss of goods and property Borrowing Debt Unpaid bills

Legal consequences include negative sanctions for wrong-doing such as:

Imprisonment Monetary loss through fines, restitution, etc.

For the family, the negative consequences included:

Not enough food Breakdown of relationships Lying to family members Family break up Neglect of children Withdrawal from family functions (skipping functions, gatherings, etc.) Loss of home

For friends, the negative consequences included:

Borrowing from them Lying to friends Loss of friends

For others, the negative consequences included: Victims of robbery Victims of assault

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

148

Community Survey: As shown in Table 8 above, 13 of the persons who completed the survey were categorized as problem gamblers. The ages of the females ranged from 22 to 57 years, with a mean age of 42.4 years. The ages of the males ranged from 29 to 66 years, with a mean of 44.8 years.

The 13 problem gamblers are made up of 8 (62%) females and 5 (38%) males.

Focus Groups: All of the Focus Groups concluded that there is no one group or type of group that constitutes or is representative of “problem gamblers”.

Key Informants: The Key Informants said a problem gambler is anyone who is addicted, and can include persons from all walks of life, all ages and genders.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in Ottawa-Gatineau differ from problem gambling in the past?

Focus Groups: A large majority agreed that problem gambling today differs from problem gambling in the past, not so much in terms of impact and negative consequences, but in terms of degree; easy access results in a lot more people falling into problem gambling today.

The above group of respondents said that the difference(s) existed today because:

Gambling is legal now Gambling is now socially acceptable More money available now through easy credit There is more disposable income today More pawn shops exist now

As a result, many more people now have easy opportunity to gamble, and thus more people are in jeopardy of falling into problem gambling.

Key Informants: In terms of consequences, the Key Informants noted that:

Gambling is legal now Many parents are now hooked on gambling Even elders gamble now There is easy access to gambling (e.g., casinos are everywhere, as are lottery booths, off-track betting, etc.) There are lots of ads that glamorize gambling. More people are in financial difficulty today than years ago because of gambling.

4.3 Goal Three To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

149

Focus Groups: All six of the Focus Groups thought that Aboriginal community members do not know a lot about problem gambling, saying that people are busy with their own lives. They also said that people do not have a clear picture of what problem gambling is because they deny there is a problem.

Five of the six Focus Groups thought that the problem gamblers themselves do not know very much about problem gambling, saying that a person may know something is amiss, but will not admit what the particular problem is. Moreover, it is only when a person seeks help that they begin to learn about problem gambling.

Key Informants: Ten (10) of the sixteen (16) Key Informants said they thought the Aboriginal community members are not very knowledgeable or only somewhat knowledgeable about problem gambling. One Key Informant thought that people are very knowledgeable, while five did not offer any opinion on this item.

To support their comments, the Key Informants said that people do not consider gambling an addiction, per se, not like they do the abuse of alcohol, drugs or smoking. Moreover, they say no one talks about gambling as a problem or an addiction, nor is there any information readily available. They also point out that the ads present a very “sexy” picture about gambling, so people do not see, nor are they informed about, the negative side.

Eleven (11) respondents thought problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable about problem gambling, three (3) thought problem gamblers were very knowledgeable, while 2 did not respond.

The reasons the eleven gave for their responses includes comments that people with problems are in denial so they do not look for information; there is a lot of information put out on the television, but problem gamblers think this does not apply to them. Moreover, gambling is not perceived as an “addiction” as are alcohol and drugs.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Focus Groups: Two of the six Focus Groups thought community members have only a little awareness about problem gambling, while three thought community members have a medium level of awareness.

Two of the six groups thought community members have little concern about problem gambling, saying that people do not care, and that not enough concern is shown. One other group thought there was a medium level of concern, and three thought there was a lot of concern among community members about problem gambling, saying that people observe those who do not pay their bills, do not pay their rent or go without food in the house due to gambling..

Key Informants: Twelve (12) persons thought that the Community is not very aware or only somewhat aware of problem gambling. They said that there is little information available in public places within Aboriginal communities, problem gambling is hidden and people do not talk about until they have to, while caregivers are aware of, but are not very informed about, problem gambling. The two Key Informants who thought members of the Community were very aware said there are a lot of ads.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

150

Four (4) of the respondents thought the community is not concerned at all about problem gambling, and eight (8) thought members are only somewhat concerned; they said that no one but the gamblers and their families are really concerned, gambling is not seen as an addiction or as a social issue, and people feel their gambling is under control. Moreover, other addictions are more noticeable and take precedence in terms of treatment, and the problem is not talked about. Three (3) said they think the community is very concerned because of problems that arise, a number of Aboriginal recognize problem gambling as a growing problem, and people are starting to talk more about it.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Focus Groups: The Focus Groups comments in this respect ranged from sympathetic to judgmental, saying that the gamblers need help, on one hand, and that they just shouldn’t do it and they should look after their families, on the other. One group said that our (Aboriginal) approach, one of “non-interference”, frequently comes into play. One of the Focus Groups said problem gamblers are often seen as con artists.

Key Informants: The Key Informants presented a range of comments, namely:

¾ People understand and want to help; ¾ Some community members minimize the problem; ¾ There’s denial that a friend or family member has a problem; ¾ There’s shame about a family member with a problem; ¾ Gambling is not viewed as a problem, even if it is a problem in fact; ¾ Gambling is not seen as a major social issue; ¾ People can still deal with and respect a person, even thought the person has a gambling problem; ¾ They are treated no differently than anyone else who needs help; ¾ It’s up to the individual to ask for help; ¾ Gambling is an individual choice; and ¾ It’s their money.

More negatively, two of the Key Informants said that the problem gambler may be perceived as a “weak-willed” person who does not care about negative consequences. Accordingly, other people may not want to associate with the problem gambler.

4.4 Goal Four To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups: All six (6) Focus Groups were aware of programs and organizations to help problem gamblers, naming Gamblers Anonymous (GA), Hotlines or Help lines, Treatment Centres, Distress Centres, Counselling Programs and Support Groups.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

151

In a related question, the Focus Groups thought Aboriginal persons participated in these programs “… only a little”, making mention of cultural differences where Aboriginal persons do not want to show their faults in public, nor do they want to give the impression that they are putting on a false face.

Key Informants: Fourteen of the 16 Key Informants were aware of programs and organizations to help problem gamblers, citing Gamblers Anonymous (GA), Hotlines or Help lines, Treatment Centres, Distress Centres, Counselling Programs and Support Groups. They also mentioned Aboriginal care groups, including the Wabano Aboriginal Health Centre and Minwaashin Lodge, a Women’s support centre.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups: In response to this question, the Focus Groups indicated community members and problem gamblers are aware of the existence of GA and Help lines, but are not very knowledgeable about either of these, nor of the other resources mentioned above.

Key Informants: Seven (7) of the sixteen (16) Key Informants thought Aboriginal community members are “not at all” knowledgeable while eight (8) thought community members are only “somewhat” knowledgeable about these types of resources.

Comments by the Key Informants to support their thinking include:

¾ There is little or no information on display or readily available; ¾ There are no posters around; ¾ There are no outreach workers specific to Aboriginal persons; ¾ Nothing on problem gambling is being put out by Aboriginal organizations; ¾ People find information only when they go looking for it – if they do not admit they have a problem, they won’t look for resources.

Only one (1) of the sixteen (16) Key Informants thought problem gamblers would be quite knowledgeable about resources to help them, saying that they know what is there for them if they want help. The rest (except one “no response”) thought the problem gamblers are only somewhat or not very knowledgeable, but state that those who decide to seek help can find the information, and that problem gamblers are likely aware of the resources available to help them but are probably not really knowledgeable because of denial.

Case Studies: All of the respondents were aware of Gamblers Anonymous and most were aware of treatment facilities, including therapeutic counselling.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist (Aboriginal) problem gamblers?

Focus Groups: All of the Focus Groups believe that an Aboriginal program designed, staffed and operated by Aboriginal persons would be of great benefit to the Aboriginal community in Ottawa-Gatineau.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

152

At present, no programs exist to serve Aboriginal persons only, but there should be, because Aboriginal persons do not readily participate in mainstream programs because of cultural differences.

Reasons for establishing a program specifically for Aboriginal persons include:

¾ A culturally sensitive program incorporating traditional teachings such as the medicine wheel would be very helpful for our people; ¾ Aboriginal persons feel more comfortable talking to other Aboriginals than with non- Aboriginals; ¾ Our people need something to help them regain their spirituality; ¾ Half the people feel isolated in the mainstream; ¾ Negative stereotypes about Aboriginals would be avoided.

With regard to the kind of programs and services that would be of benefit to Aboriginal persons, the Focus Groups thought that services and programs similar to those in the mainstream should be used, but these should be imbued with traditional elements and incorporate our spiritual concepts and practices such as sweats.

The Focus Groups would support Aboriginal-based Help or Hot Lines, Counselling Programs, Support Groups and Treatment Centres for problem gamblers. They also state that awareness and prevention programs directed toward young people especially would be very beneficial. Trained Aboriginal personnel should deliver the program(s).

The Focus Groups thought that the programs and services should be offered at one of the Aboriginal organizations in Ottawa, naming the Odawa Native Friendship Centre and the Wabano Centre as examples. They indicated that it really doesn’t matter which organization runs the program, but it should be readily accessible, and at a discreet location out of the public eye.

They said that the programs should be made interesting and that food should be provided at the gatherings (meetings), as this is part of the Aboriginal way.

Focus Group members felt that there should be different but complementary programs directed toward adults and towards youth; there should be educative, preventative programs in schools. Early intervention would be more beneficial than later harm-reduction programs.

Key Informants: The Key Informants also support the above-mentioned programs, but mention specific additional items such as the following should be part of any program designed to counter or ameliorate problem gambling:

¾ Suicide Prevention Programs; ¾ Budgeting; ¾ Learning about money and the use of money; ¾ Parenting skills; ¾ Alternative ways to socialize. The programs should include information about what happens to a person mentally when they are gambling, and should recognize that gambling addiction is similar to other addictions in nature and impact.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

153

Key informants also felt that there should be different but complementary programs directed toward adults and towards youth; there should be educative, preventative programs in schools and that early intervention would be more beneficial than later harm-reduction programs.

They said that all avenues should be used to spread information about gambling and the negative effects of problem gambling, including all of the various media, posters and brochures.

They said we need to recognize that gambling is a part of modern life, but that any program should expose problems arising from problem gambling.

The overall objective of the program should be to wean problem gamblers and to prevent young persons from falling into problem gambling in the first place.

Case Studies: Two of the respondents indicated that they use mainstream programming as it meets their needs. One other indicated he finds that the spiritual teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, tied in with one-on-one therapeutic counselling, would be sufficient for him, although he acknowledged that Aboriginal programs and services would be of benefit to persons who are familiar with traditional Native American (Aboriginal) teachings. The other four indicated that Aboriginal programs and services would be of very great help.

Supplementary Question: At the direction of the LRAC, in addition to the basic research questions that guided the overall study, we also asked the Focus Groups their thoughts on why people gamble and asked the respondents in the Case Studies why they gamble.

Responses from the Focus Groups may be categorized as follows:

TABLE 9 Reasons for Gambling

EMOTIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL FINANCIAL For the rush High hopes To socialize To win money To feel good Chase dreams Peer pressure Greed To show off It’s learned behaviour Entertainment Low income To feel better than others Part of our survival mode Diversion Poverty Overcome boredom People are addicted

Case study participants gave reasons why they started gambling that include the following:

¾ I moved to other gambling because bingo was too boring. ¾ I thought gambling was exciting and romantic. ¾ I saw other people gambling and wanted to win big money. ¾ My mother loved to play bingo and I too got hooked on it, to win money. ¾ I liked it and wanted to make extra money. ¾ I had no idea that it could become a problem, an addiction. ¾ I was depressed and wanted to cheer up. ¾ It was handy and I could smoke at the VLT machines. ¾ I started for fun, and got hooked right away with my first win of $400 at bingo. ¾ I started as a teenager, making small bets for fun with my friends and schoolmates.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

154

5. CONCLUSIONS After the data were collected and analyzed in relation to each research goal, the written findings were presented to the Local Research Advisory Committee members. The conclusions ratified by the Local Research Advisory Committee are shown below.

Conclusions relating to the specific research questions for the project are as follows. 5.1 Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

¾ The general definition of gambling offered by the Aboriginal Community was taking risks when money is involved.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community?

¾ The Focus Group members and the Key Informants perceived the prevalence of gambling among Aboriginal persons in Ottawa-Gatineau to be medium-high, which is consistent with the 65 to 70% reported in the Community Survey with regard to Lottery Tickets.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

¾ They purchase lottery, instant win and raffle tickets most frequently, followed by Slots and Bingo. ¾ There is little involvement in arcades, stocks, horse racing, and Internet gambling, and sports betting.

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

¾ They engage primarily in gambling at authorized locations. ¾ Frequency ranges from several times per week to once every two months.

Question 5: How frequently, and for how long per session, do community members gamble?

¾ The most frequent gambling activity is the purchase of gambling tickets, but this takes very little time – the vast majority spent less than 15 minutes in this activity. Likewise, sports betting takes little time. ¾ Fewer persons were involved with bingo, play at casinos or at the horse races, but those who played spend more time in this activity than in buying tickets.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

¾ Of the 53.5% of Community Survey participants who responded to this question, the majority spent less than $20 per session when buying gambling tickets. ¾ Few spent large amounts of money.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

155

¾ Gamblers come from all walks, social and economic stations of life, and all ages.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in Ottawa?

¾ None has been continued.

5.2 Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling?”

¾ Shirking social, financial, familial and legal responsibilities to the point where personal, familial and household goods are lost and a gambler’s physical and mental health and his/her life are at risk.

Question 2: What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

¾ The prevalence of gambling among Aboriginal persons is perceived as medium to high.

Question 3: What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

¾ They avoid financial, social, moral and legal responsibilities, and keep gambling whether they win or lose.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

¾ Negative impacts on the mental and physical health, and on the financial, social, moral and legal circumstances of a person, including lack of money to buy essentials for self and dependents (family) or to pay bills.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

¾ No one group constitutes “problem gamblers”, but the Community Survey shows that females outnumber males, as does the number of females vis-à-vis males in the Case Studies.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

¾ Yes: the legal and social environment has changed, and easier access affects the extent of problem gambling and brings in groups of persons who did not gamble in the past, such as elders.

5.3 Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

156

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

¾ Both community members and problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable about problem gambling.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

¾ Respondents thought that community members are not very aware of, nor very concerned about, problem gambling in the community.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

¾ Comments from the respondents ranged from sympathetic to laissez-faire to expressions of thinking the gamblers fail to take responsibility for their actions, although the majority recognized that the decision to gamble is an individual choice, but are still willing to help the gambler.

5.4 Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

¾ Mainstream programs such as Gamblers Anonymous and Gam-Anon are available to everyone, but no other organizations are dedicated entirely to dealing with gambling, and there are no resources available to provide services specifically for Aboriginal gamblers or problem gamblers.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

¾ Problem gamblers but are not highly knowledgeable about the programs.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Community Members

¾ An Aboriginal program designed, staffed and operated by Aboriginal persons should be established to provide services to Aboriginal persons living in Ottawa-Gatineau, which program should incorporate traditional Aboriginal teachings, spiritual beliefs and ceremonies. ¾ Aboriginal-based and staffed Help or Hot Lines, Counselling Programs, Support Groups and Treatment Centres for Aboriginal problem gamblers should be set up. ¾ Awareness and prevention programs directed toward Aboriginal young people, delivered by trained Aboriginal personnel, should be set up. ¾ Programs and services to help Aboriginal problem gamblers should be offered at one of the Aboriginal organizations in Ottawa.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

157

Note: Two of the persons interviewed as Case Studies said it did not really matter to them where they got help, but the other five said an Aboriginal program would be helpful.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

158

Appendix I: Survey Instrument

Community Survey Date: ______(No. ______)

SURVEY: CHECK ALL THAT APPLY (ANONYMOUS: CONFIDENTIAL WHEN COMPLETED)

(Please make sure you fill in all of the applicable blanks for each question. Thanks!)

A. Are you: Male? ____ Female? ____

B. What is your age? ____

C. What is your aboriginal ancestry? ______

D. In what community do you live now? ______

E. What is your current marital status?

1. Single (never married) 2. Married 3. Common-law 4. Divorced or separated 5. Widowed 9. No response

F. What is the highest level of education you have completed?

1. No schooling 2. Some elementary school 3. Completed elementary school 4. Some high school/junior high 5. Completed high school 6. Some community college 7. Some technical school 8. Completed community college (certificate, diploma) 9. Completed technical school (certificate, diploma) 10. Some University 11. Completed Bachelor’s Degree 12. Completed Master’s Degree 13. Completed Doctoral Degree 14. Professional Degree 98. Don’t know 99. No response

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

159

G. What is your present job status?

1. Employed full-time (30 or more hours/week) 2. Employed part-time (less than 30 hours/week) 3. Unemployed (out of work but looking for work) 4. Student – Employed part-time or full-time 5. Student – Not employed 6. Retired 7. Homemaker 8. Don’t know 9. No response

H. What type of work do you currently do (or, what did you do when you were employed)?

I. With regard to lodging, do you: 1. own your house? 2. rent? 3. other (Explain) ______

J. How many people under the age of 18 live in your household? ______

K. What was your total household income, before taxes, last year? $ ______

Please continue. Use the Legend below to complete the table on the next page

LEGEND

Question Response Q1. Have you bet or spent money on this activity? Check all that apply Q2. How often did you bet or spend money on 9. Daily this activity? 10. 2-6 times/week 11. About once/week 12. 2-3 times/month 13. About once/month 14. 6-11 times/year 15. 1-5 times/year 16. Never in the past year 98. Don’t know 99. No response Q3. How many minutes/hours do you normally spend on this activity each time you play? Indicate Total Number of Minutes Q4. How much money, not including winnings, did you spend on this activity in a typical month? Indicate Total Number of Dollars

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

160

Q5. What is the largest amount of money you have spent on this activity in any one day? Indicate Number of Dollars

1-5 Thinking about the past 12 months, please check (in column 2 for Q1) all the gambling activities in column one that you have engaged in. If you did not check any activities, you are finished so please turn in your questionnaire. If you checked any of the activities, please complete the other four columns for each activity you participated in by using the legend on the previous page.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Kind of How Minutes Amount Largest Gambling Activities Activity Often? Spent $ Spent $ Amt. Gambling tickets 1. Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2. Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3. Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g.: break- open, pull- tab, Nevada strips) 4. Raffles or fundraising tickets Bingo 5. Bingo Gambling with family or friends

6. Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money) Electronic gambling

7. Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8. Casino slot machines 9. Arcade or video games for money 10. Gambling on the Internet Sports betting 11. Sport Select (e.g.: Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12. Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity-sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13. Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14. Sports with a bookie Horse racing

15. Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track) Casinos

16. Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g.: poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17. Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g.: Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

161

VLTs (e.g.: poker, blackjack, roulette)] Speculative investments 18. Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs) Other gambling 19. Games of skill for money (e.g.: pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20. Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms) 21. Any other form of gambling (specify)

6. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose? 0. Never 5. Sometimes 6. Most of the Time 7. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

7. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet or spent more money than you wanted to on gambling? 0. Never a. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

8. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you needed to gamble with larger amounts of money to get the same feeling of excitement? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

9. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you gone back another day to try to win back the money you lost? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

10. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

162

3. Almost Always a. Don’t know b. No response

11. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

12. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

13. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt like you would like to stop betting money or gambling, but didn’t think you could? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

14. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have people criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether or not you thought it was true? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

15. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

16. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has gambling caused you any health problems, including stress or anxiety? 0. Never 1. Sometimes

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

163

2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

17. Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has your gambling caused any financial problems for you or your household? 0. Never 1. Sometimes 2. Most of the Time 3. Almost Always 8. Don’t know 9. No response

You have reached the end of the Ottawa Aboriginal Community survey. Thank you!

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

164

Appendix II: Focus Group Instrument

The different focus groups will discuss questions from each goal that will help people understand the issues of gambling and problem gambling. The facilitator will guide the groups through the meeting by raising questions and topics that will be discussed amongst members of the group.

The following questions will be used as prompts and topics to gather a group perspective on the attitudes, values and perception of gambling and problem gambling. The facilitator will guide the group throughout the discussion, keeping the group on topic and productive, while collecting a broad- based sample of opinions.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question #1 – What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #4 – Where and when do community members gamble? Question #7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question #1 – What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #4 – What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

165

FOCUS GROUP GUIDE TO DISCUSSION

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Q1-1 What activities are considered to be “gambling”, in your opinion? (SEE CHECK LIST)

Other: ______

Q1-2: How much gambling do you think is done by aboriginal persons in Ottawa-Gatineau? Little? __ Medium amount? __ A lot? __

Why do you think that? ______

Q1-4: What kind of gambling do you think aboriginal persons engage in mostly? (see check list)

In your view, where do aboriginal persons gamble mostly? ______

When do you think they gamble? ______

Why do you think aboriginal persons gamble? ______

Q1-7: Who do you think are the gamblers in the community? no names, but are they old, young, married, single, rich, poor, working, unemployed? ______

Q1-8: Was gambling part of your traditional culture? Yes ____ No ____

If you know, please describe the kind of activities that took place. ______

Does this type of gambling still exist? Yes? ___ No ___

Explain: ______

What impact does traditional gambling have on the nature and extent of gambling among aboriginal persons today? ______

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community. Q2-1: What do you define as problem gambling? ______

Q2-2: How much problem gambling do you think there is among aboriginal persons in Ottawa-Gatineau? A little ____ Mid range ____ A lot ____

Reasons for reply? ______

Q2-4 What do you think are the consequences of problem gambling for:

(a) the individual? ______

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

166

(b) the person’s family? ______(c) friends? ______(d) other persons? ______Q2-5 No names-but: who do you think are the problem gamblers in the aboriginal community? No names, but are they old, young, married, single, rich, poor, working, unemployed, etc? ______

Q2-6 Does problem gambling in Ottawa-Gatineau today differ from problem gambling in the past?

Yes ___ No ___

If yes, how? (why do you say that?) ______

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Q3-1 Do you think members of the aboriginal community in Ottawa-Gatineau know a lot about problem gambling?

Yes ___ No ___

Why? ______

Do you think aboriginal problem gamblers in Ottawa-Gatineau know a lot about problem gambling? yes ___ no ___

Why? ______

Q3-2: Do you think community members are aware of problem gambling in Ottawa?

Little? ______Medium? _____ A lot? _____

Why do you think this? ______

How concerned do you think community members are about problem gambling among aboriginal persons?

Little? ______Medium? ______A Lot? ______

Why do you think this? ______

Q3-3 What are the attitudes of members of the aboriginal community toward those aboriginal persons who have gambling problems? ______

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Q4-1 Are you aware of any programs, organization or agencies in Ottawa that exist to help problem gamblers in general?

Yes ___ No ___

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

167

Discuss: ______

______

Do you think aboriginal persons participate in these general programs? ______

______

Are you aware of any programs, organization or agencies in Ottawa that exist to help Aboriginal problem gamblers?

Yes ___ No ___

Discuss: ______

Q4-2 What do you know about these groups or programs that are available to help: problem gamblers in general? ______

Aboriginal problem gamblers? ______

Q4-3 Do you think there should be programs or services put in place specifically to assist aboriginal problem gamblers?

Yes ___ No ___

Why?

Discuss: ______

What kind of programs or services should be put in place to assist Aboriginal problem gamblers?

______

Do you think the aboriginal programs should be:

(a) Gender specific? Why? ______(b) Age specific? Why? ______(c) Other? Why? ______

Do you think there is a need for a program to help prevent aboriginal persons from falling into problem gambling?

Yes ____ No ____

Discuss: ______

If “yes”, where and how do you think such a program should be set up and delivered?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

168

______

Do you have any other comments, points or issues on the matter of gambling among aboriginal persons in Ottawa-Gatineau? ______

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

169

Appendix III: Key Informant Instrument

The following questions will be used as topics and prompts to gather data from people that work or are involved in key positions around the area and have access to unique and special knowledge related to the Aboriginal community and gambling.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and values).

Question #1 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question #2 – How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Question #1 – What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 – What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

170

Appendix IV: Case Study Instrument

A FOUR-COMPONENT FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING PROBLEM GAMBLER INTERVIEWS AND DEVELOPING PROBLEM GAMBLER CASE STUDIES

Questions and prompts will be used to ensure that each problem gambler case study interview addresses the following four components.

V. Case history (life story, personal history and background)

VI. Gambling history (beginnings and developments)

VII. Problem gambling description (behaviours, rewards and consequences)

VIII. Help-seeking recommendations (this is not an attempt to convince the problem gambler to go for help but a search for the types of services, programs and help that problem gamblers would use to get help)

Using the organization provided by the four-component framework, each case study will be written up anonymously as a story of a problem gambler and a report of a problem gambler interview.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

171

Appendix V: Case Studies

Case Study No. 1

Mr. A. is a 48-year-old “Status Indian” from the Algonquin Nation who lived on his reserve during his childhood. He is the youngest of three children – one brother and one sister. He attended elementary school on his reserve and completed his grade 8 in a nearby non-Native town. While living on his reserve, he took a computer training course. When he was 23, he left his reserve to take a heavy equipment operators course near Montreal. He now lives in Ottawa. He is currently unemployed, but had in the past been engaged in entrepreneurial activities, having a run a video store in the town near his community, and also sold refreshments at various powwows in Ontario and Quebec.

Mr. A started gambling when he was a teenager, making small bets with friends. He also started buying lottery tickets while he was in his late teens. He also started going to organized Bingo games at that time.

He indicated that he had played Bingo “all my life”, initially because “everyone was going”. He wound up going to a Bingo game every night. He estimated he was spending about $1500 per month on Bingo, as he would play many cards at once, and go to several games a day.

Finally, he started to get “fed up” with Bingo. He had started drinking, and after Bingo, he would go to a bar to pass some time. In the bar were several Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs), and he started playing them. The first time he played, he won, and really got a kick out of winning.

He says that “winning”, in and of itself, is a great attraction to gambling. People play to win, and when they win, they continue to play because they “feel” they are going to win again, and because they are playing with “their (the casino or track or other establishment) money” anyway. He believes that besides this, it is human nature that people always want more!

When he was losing, which was very often, he would become angry with the machines and with himself. He would continue playing to try to get his money back, and to experience the high he got from winning. When he continued to lose, he would become depressed, realizing that he had spent more money than he had intended to spend.

He said that when he was on a losing streak, he would change machines or change locations in order to change his luck. His thinking is that if a person really needs the money, the person will not win, but self-deception (where a person tells himself he is going to win soon) leads a person to try to win anyway.

In the meantime, he realized he had become addicted to alcohol, and went for treatment. He gave up alcohol, but then concentrated on gambling. He stated that he simply “changed addictions”.

He eventually quit playing Bingo and began playing the VLT’s every night. He reckoned he would lose some $100, $200 or $300 a night, but would win anywhere from $600 to $2500 at least once a week. He would use these winnings to keep on playing.

Sometimes, he would feel very lucky, and would just know he was going to win; he could fairly see it (the good luck) coming. He said that if you are lucky, you could win a bit one night and then the next night you could win a great deal of money … enough to last for a number of days.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

172

In the long run, he would not win, so he would use the money his Video Store brought in to continue playing. This continued to the point where he estimates he lost more than $40,000 over five years and eventually lost his Store.

However, he would not dwell on his losses, but would simply put them out of his mind. When he did think about it, he would make up excuses to himself and to others, just as he had when he was drinking.

His addiction to gambling was brought home to him one evening when he was playing VLT’s, along with a number of men at other machines next to him; a nice looking woman went by the machines, and MR A. noticed that not one of the men even looked at her, they were concentrating so much on their machines! He realized that he was in fact the same as them, insofar as playing the machines was becoming the main attraction in his life, so he decided to return to Bingo after being away from it for some four years.

Eventually he decided that he would cut down on the amount of time and money that he was spending on gambling. However, when he was not playing, he found it very difficult.

So he started to gamble again, but would not take much money. When he went back to the machines, he immediately won $100 for 25 cents, then shortly after, he took $20 and won $1000, and so he was hooked again for 2 years. He came to realize that gambling, as other addictions, is very insidious, or as he expressed it, it “… will lead you into evil ways.”

He went to say that he knows that people will get so depressed they will kill themselves because of losses at gambling, others do bad things so they can get money to keep on gambling, people lie and are otherwise dishonest about gambling and its impact on them, and even about their winnings; for example, problem gamblers often tell people they have won more than they actually did, or say they lost less than they really spent.

As for himself, he acknowledges that he exaggerates his wins and losses, and that he has a gambling problem. At the same time, he continues to have difficulty with alcohol, and has gone into treatment on several occasions for this reason. Interestingly, he feels that treatment for alcoholism helps him deal with gambling issues.

At present, Mr. A states that he continues to gamble, but does so in moderation. He believes that it is “okay” to gamble, but a person should not overdo it. He says that he now buys a few lottery tickets a week, and may go to gamble, especially to Bingo, every two or three weeks.

Mr. A realizes he is a “problem gambler”, but he does not attend Gamblers Anonymous. Instead, he attends AA, first of all because he was told he should by the people working at the treatment center he was in, and secondly because he finds that the philosophy of the AA Program helps him in dealing with gambling to excess. He states that one addiction is the same as another, so going to AA also helps with regard to gambling.

He says that if you really want to reduce the number of persons with problems relating to or flowing from gambling, you should make an effort to prevent people, especially young people, from getting involved in the first place.

Mr. A feels strongly that information and education about gambling would be of great help, especially for young people, so they might not get involved in problem gambling. A facilitator could review the

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

173 negative results of gambling, for example, the loss of money and then going into debt, dishonesty with everyone, and distress over not winning.

He suggests that statistics showing the win-lose ratio in the long run would be useful information, namely that in the long run, a person is going to lose, and the odds are against a person winning in the long run.

To prevent young people from falling into problem gambling, he suggests that people should speak with groups of young people; resource persons should include “real gamblers” who know first-hand the troubles that result from excessive gambling. As part of the process, he also suggests the use of pamphlets and brochures to get the word out.

One of the key things he believes needs to be done is that we need to prove to the young people that there is something better than gambling, so alternatives should be presented as a matter of course.

Case Study No. 2

Ms. B, a middle-aged First Nation citizen, was the eighth of fourteen children who grew up on a reserve western Quebec. She left her reserve and lived in Ottawa and other urban centres for a number of years until she returned to her home community about ten years ago. She has completed courses in community colleges and at university. She began working at the age of 13 in tourist camps near her northern community, and has since worked in social services and health care in various capacities, including serving as a counsellor in a residential drug and alcohol treatment centre, and working as a Registered Nursing Assistant.

Her first taste of gaming was when she attended bingos with her grandmother when she was 8 or 10 years old. The bingos were run by the church and the prizes consisted of food, blankets, wash tubs and other similar items which were of use to families who did not have much money. At first, the bingos were free, but later on, they began to charge for the bingo cards.

Her first exposure to gambling for money was when guides at the tourist camp allowed her to join them in playing for five or ten cents, while the guides themselves played for 25 cents or a dollar. This instilled in her the desire to also play for this “big money”. This was part of the reason that she started to gamble. In addition, people seemed to be having fun gambling and she fit in.

She went for many years without gambling very much and then started to play VLT’s about three years ago, and also went to the casino initially to “check it out”. She played for her own entertainment for a year or so, but soon became a problem gambler. When she was winning, she felt in control of everything, that nothing could touch her. She would have adrenalin high!

When she was losing, she was filled with anger, rage directed at the machines, and she would even beg the machines to give her a payout. She started to isolate herself socially, and began to damn herself. She hid from people and started to become paranoid; she became depressed and started to think about suicide. In her job, she found that her clients had many problems that she could not help with, because of her own problems - her denial and dishonesty.

She had visions of the machines in her head when she lay down, and often prayed for sleep to come. She experienced physical pain from the tension of wanting to win, and yet she kept going back.

She got hung up on VLT’s and lost a great deal of money on the machines. When she was on welfare, she would keep $65 out of $500 a month, and when she started working, she would often

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

174 lose her whole pay cheque. In one year, she estimates she lost about $33,000 in salary. To get more money to gamble, she sold her furniture and many of her other possessions. She started to write bad cheques and got busted for that.

At work, her boss knew something was wrong, as she started missing work on a regular basis, saying that she was sick. She would go for lunch and not return, and one day her boss sent someone to look for her, and they saw her car at the gambling spot. On one occasion, she really was sick, but some money went missing from two of the clients she had been working with, and the boss thought she had stolen the money. Accordingly, her boss would not accept her medical certificate, at which she became very angry and had to resign.

Earlier in her life, she had also become addicted to alcohol, and had been in recovery for thirteen years. With gambling, she found she had transferred from one addiction to another. When she realized (or admitted) what she was doing to herself, she became very ashamed, especially after all those years in recovery.

She realized she had to quit, so she started going to Gamblers Anonymous. She managed to stop for a while, and resumed her schooling to receive the rest of her university credits. But that was not the end of it! She moved back to her reserve and did not gamble for several months, but late last fall (2003), she went back to a gambling place, and shortly after wrote another bad cheque. She ran away, but she knew she had to do something to stop.

She returned to GA, and keeps going to meetings, even though she has had a few minor relapses since last winter. She feels that GA is a good place to go, if a person wants to quit gambling. However, it is essential that a person is honest with him or herself, admit s/he has a problem and go for treatment.

She says that she had attended AA, but the focus of that program is different from the gambling problem, and the people at AA did not want to hear about the gambling.

She has attended treatment programs, but they are geared specifically toward substance abuse. She suggests that treatment for gambling addiction should be incorporated into every treatment centre program.

But she said, in closing, that as long as gambling is seen as a secondary addiction only, no money will ever be available for treatment.

Case Study No. 3

Ms. C is a person of Mohawk descent in her forties who grew up in Ottawa, the youngest of 3 brothers and 4 sisters. She completed Grade 12 and has some college education. She started working at the age of 16 in the clerical field, and is now in accounting, earning around $40,000 per year.

She started going to Bingo games with her mother, who really loved the game, when she was about 15 years old. She went initially because she wanted to win money, and she got hooked on it right away. She also began playing cards with family members for 25 cents, and in fact has never played cards when there is no money involved. Overall, she considers herself a big risk-taker. Right now, she gambles wherever there is action – primarily at the casino, at bingo games, or with relatives. She prefers card games with family over the casinos, because large amounts of money are involved, and she has more fun socially.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

175

When she started gambling at the casino, she would put a quarter in a slot machine, then progressed to three quarters, then to fifty cents, then a dollar. Now, she plays any machines that accept large amounts.

She has in turn won very large amounts, the largest being $48,000 at the casino. By the same token, she has lost $2,000 at lunch hour. However, she saw that this was a definite problem, because she was losing money she needed to pay bills and pay the rent. Fortunately, a family member bailed her out, and she has not slipped back into that pattern.

She states that when she first would win, she was very excited, but now tends to view a win as an opportunity to get more money to gamble with. She says that she is prepared to lose when she goes gambling, and that she is using her own, and not anyone else’s money.

She is still gambling, but is aware of what could happen as a result of excessive gambling: when she was losing money during her lunch hours and her husband found out, it almost ruined her marriage. She noted that when you are gambling, you do not think about things like that.

However, she still does lose large amounts of money, keeps her losses from her husband, and hides from him when she is at the casino, as he works there; if he sees her, he tells her that she should go home.

At the same time, she maintains that she does not have a problem at the present time.

She advises people who are experiencing problems as a result of gambling to get help. She says that when gambling, a person gets a certain feeling that can’t be found elsewhere – it is an addiction, and you need help to deal with that.

One thing a person can do to help themselves is to get bar themselves from going to the casino. The idea of embarrassing yourself if you are stopped from going in, especially in front of others, is a good deterrent.

Another thing is to read literature that can give suggestions of what to do to overcome the urge to gamble. She read one book that suggested that when the urge to gamble arises, a person could put money into an RSP or some other instrument where you cannot take out the money very easily. She says that she has followed this idea, and has put over $2,000 into an RSP in less than a year. However, it is up to the individual to make themselves do this.

She has not attended any programs such as GA, but says that if she saw herself getting out of control, she probably would attend. What helps her steer clear of problems arising from gambling is seeing people, including some of her friends and acquaintances, lose everything. She also hears about suicides by word of mouth (as this is not publicized in the newspapers!). These things help her keep her thinking straight now.

She does not know if a program designed specifically to serve Aboriginal persons would be beneficial, but she would not turn her back on this idea, as the problems she experienced with gambling could very well come back and hit her again any time, if she is not wary.

She says that if a program is established, it should be interesting and fun, without blame or backbiting, and must be confidential. The program should be organized by age groups and should have other organized activities to serve as a diversion from gambling.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

176

In closing, she says that people need to know that gambling is an addiction – a seductive and dangerous form of entertainment. Her best advice? “Stay away from the place!”

Case Study No. 4

Ms. D is in her sixties and is a member of the Cree Nation who grew up on the land near a remote community in Northern Ontario. She is the third youngest of four sisters, and has three brothers.

She partially completed elementary school and started working for low wages when she was fifteen years old. She is now retired and sews or knits craft items to bring in extra cash.

She stated that she started gambling only about twenty years ago, after her children were not longer at home with her. She first went to a Bingo game with the hope of making money and found that she liked it (Bingo) very much. She also started to go to the casino to play the slots, and in the end, she essentially gave up Bingo and concentrated on the slots, which she would frequently play for hours on end. She said it was not unusual for her to go into the casino at 11 AM and not leave until 11 PM.

She would go whenever she had money. She would win on occasion, but always lost much more often than she won. She remembers that she once won $6460, but soon gave it back to the machines. She remembers one time when she had $1600 in the bank, and once she started, she did not go home until it was all gone.

On the occasions when she won, she sometimes felt excited, but she would still try to win more. If she won on the 50 cent machines, she would move to the dollar machines, but would then lose back the money. When she lost, she became depressed and would think about all the things she might have bought for her four kids or her three grandchildren. Moreover, she would lie about gambling to people she knew, she would cheat and would borrow money to keep going.

She finally realized she would have to do something because her gambling was really out of control. She said that she heard that a person could have themselves banned from the casino, so she decided that she would try that. When she decided that, she approached the casino officials, but there was no one available to process her request.

Fortunately, she decided to go back the next day, and was able to have herself banned for the maximum five years. During the process, the official asked her if she wanted to have the ban to apply in the Casino de Montréal, but she said “No! No!”. She said that in the back of her mind, she still thought she could control her gambling, and wanted to have the other casino as a back up. But when she “signed herself out”, she felt a great relief, she felt “lighter”!

After three months, she got a great urge to go to the casino. She said she could see slot machines before her eyes, and she almost went crazy. She called a friend to ask her to take her to Montreal, but the friend refused because of bad weather. Ms. D’s son’s car was broken, so as a last resort, she decided to take the bus to Montreal, and called another friend who agreed to go with her.

While they were getting ready, her friend began to speak of all the money it would take for the bus fare and taxis to go back and forth. As they continued to talk, Ms. D began to lose the urge to go, and began to forget about it. When she told her friend this, the friend, who was in AA, said that they should then continue to talk about gambling and problem gambling. Ms. D decided then to start going to GA, and said that that was the last time that she wanted to go gambling.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

177

She had given up drinking 24 years ago, and realizes now that gambling is an addiction – gambling took her just like alcohol. She no longer gambles, and advises people who want to stop to ask others for help. She suggested a person contact another person who has also experienced an addiction. She does not think that a person who has not suffered an addiction would not be able to help, but thinks that one addict would likely be able to understand another addict more easily. Using herself as an example in this regard, she says that she could never understand how a person could drink just one drink and then drink no more.

She says that Gamblers Anonymous would be a good source of help, as there are other gambling addicts there. She has used other mechanisms to besides GA, including going bankrupt and getting financial counselling from professionals. GA has helped her because when she goes to meetings, she does not feel alone to deal with her problems. When a person is feeling lonely, GA also provides a good place to go. Financial counselling has also helped her get her life in order, including getting rid of her credit cards. At GA, you can also find people you can trust and with whom you can share your problems and concerns. It may be painful, but it works.

Ms. D said that a program to provide services to Aboriginal persons would be of help, especially for some people, but this is not essential. She said that GA is for persons with an addiction to gambling, and it does not really matter who a person gets help from.

She said that when she stopped drinking and went to AA, she got help from all kinds of persons from all walks of life. She noted that well-educated persons felt the same as her when they took a drink, and this helped her realize that our problems with addictions are essentially the same.

To those who are suffering an addiction, she suggests they seek out help. There are GA groups and treatment centers that can help you. Put aside your pride, ask for help and trust people. She said it is also important to forgive yourself for the harm you have done as a result of your addiction(s).

She also said it is important to find something productive to occupy your time after you stop gambling. She took up crafting, and this keeps her busy. She continues to read the twelve steps of the GA Program and is happy and respects herself now.

Case Study No. 5

Mr. E is a mid-aged Cree who grew up off-reserve in Saskatchewan. He is the tenth child in a family of 8 brothers and 7 sisters. He completed high school and has lived in the Ottawa area for about ten years. He began working at the age of 12, serving as a fishing guide, and currently works in the food service industry.

He had been greatly involved with alcohol until the early 1990’s, and for six years thought he was doing very well – that he had “addiction” beat. In 1996, he had paid a casual visit to the casino in Gatineau and was greatly pleased with the elegant surroundings. He really liked the casino setting and really liked playing the slots. On top of that, he started winning jackpots two or three times a week and never lost any money for the first year. He knew he had a problem with alcohol, and thought that was his only problem. He never thought he would become addicted to gambling.

But in the second year, things began to change. He continued going to the casino two or three times a week, but started losing. Initially, he had played the 25 cent slot machines, then progressed to the

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

178

50 cent, $1 and $5 machines. He would bet large amounts, from $500 to $1000, and began losing $5000 to $10,000 on a regular basis.

From time to time he had won up to $10,000, and when he won, he said he would feel happy. But the winning stopped and the losing continued, and he wound up feeling depressed and guilty. Nevertheless, he would keep playing to try to win his money back. He would sometimes put $500 or $600 into a machine and not win, then when he moved to another machine, someone would win on their first try on the machine he left, and he would become angry with the person who won and angry with the machine.

With so many negative feelings, he found himself back using alcohol and fell into the use of both prescription and illegal drugs when he was gambling. He started going to the casino in Ontario so he could drink alcohol while he was gambling.

He started spending his entire income on gambling, and started borrowing to get money to gamble, or to survive for a few more days. One time when he ran out of money, he took his partner’s bankcard and stole money from his partner’s account. He found it hard to understand when his partner stayed and suggested he get some help

On one occasion, after losing some $12,000 in one day, he started thinking about suicide. In one year, he had lost over $100,000, and recurring thoughts about suicide would wake him up at nights. After losing all your money, knowing you will not have any more until the following week and that you can not get money from anywhere else, you become desperate. He was in this state when he finally hit his bottom. When he had stopped drinking, he had gone to AA two times a week for at least a year, and that helped him stay sober. With this in mind, he went back to AA again. This helped him again, but when he came close to a relapse, he got a referral to a treatment centre, and now receives one-on-one counselling once a week, focussed specifically on gambling. When he was first scheduled to attend the treatment centre, he kept “chickening out”, and delayed the start by a month. Finally, he began attending the weekly sessions, and they have been of benefit to him. With this help, he has gone several months without going to the casino.

When asked how the programs he participated in had helped him, he replied simply, “I’m here today!”.

To anyone who wants to stop gambling, he said that the person should ask for help, on one hand, but keep in mind that the responsibility lies with the person himself. He said that he had been raised in the Roman Catholic way, and found that recognition of, and faith in, a higher power also helped him. The spiritual aspect is essential to recovery, as is the need to overcome denial. He came to realize, however, that you have to look for spirituality within your self.

One thing that he recommends is that a person with addiction should participate in therapy, so as to get to the real cause of the addiction. He said that after he started to attend the treatment centre, he realized that addiction flows from problems deep inside a person, and these need to be brought out and explored. He noted that the whole process of recovery is “scary” and “lonely”, because a person has to take action on his own and has to come out of the “cocoon” provided by the addiction.

He said that he was not brought up in the Native culture, and so did not understand the teachings, even though he speaks the language. Accordingly, he does not feel comfortable in going to traditional ceremonies, such as sweats. However, he said that for those who grew up in the culture, Aboriginal programs and services would likely be helpful.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

179

Case Study No. 6

Mr. F is a fifty-one year old man of Algonquin and Mohawk descent who was adopted out when he was about sixteen months old, and was raised in a foster home where he was in the middle in a family of about twelve other foster children. He has one natural sister, as far as he knows. He completed Grade 10, and now has Grade 12 equivalency. He started working at 15 as a stock boy, and then worked on construction until the mid-1970’s when he entered the civil service. He had played cards growing up, but did no serious gambling until the year 2000. That year, he separated from his wife and blamed himself for that, and became depressed. He said that VLT’s were readily accessible in the complex where he worked, and you could smoke while at the machines, so he started going there to play them during lunch hour. He found that while at the machines, he forgot his depression. He realizes now that he was gambling to avoid looking at the problems he had, and to avoid issues of abandonment during childhood, and to deal with his separation.

While he was gambling, he played the VLT’s every day that he had money. On paydays, he would frequently lose his whole pay cheque. He once won $1,200 and when he won, says he felt “great”. But when he lost, he became angry with himself and blamed himself for losing.

He said he managed to stop by joining a serious healing circle, going to “closed” sweats and talking with elders. (“Closed” refers to the fact that participation in the sweat would be limited to those who are there for similar and specific reasons, as in this case, of dealing with addictions.) He suggests that others could benefit from these methods, as well as from participating in closed circles with others who have the same issue(s). It rests with the individual, however, to take the decision to ask for help.

He said he thinks it is very important to talk with people who have the same problem if a person is trying to stop. Attending a closed men’s sharing circle helped him to do so. He said the circle helped him to face up to the core issues he carried inside him.

He said an Aboriginal program would help him by providing a way to share remedies with others.

Case Study No. 7

Ms. G is a 38-year-old female Ojibway who was adopted out and was raised in a foster family in an urban area in southern Ontario, and who is currently estranged from her family. She started working at 17, serving the public, and is now employed by the federal government.

She started gambling about ten years ago, when she went to a Bingo game with a friend, just for fun. However, she won $400 the first night and was hooked thereafter. She believes that one reason she started to gamble was that she was in an unhappy relationship and she wanted to avoid a poor home situation … to get away for a while, to forget her family.

But her gambling was not limited to Bingo. She began going to the casinos to play the slots, so the pattern she developed was to play bingo all day then go to the slots at night. She eventually stopped going to the bingo hall and concentrated on the slots.

At the casino, she would lose a minimum of $400 each time she went, which was two or three days a week. She would usually lose between $500 and $600 a day, and on one day recently, she lost $2,500. She would win on occasion, sometimes as much as $800, but she would put back her winnings right away. She said she would stay until she was broke.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

180

Even when she won, she was not happy, because she wanted to win more. Indeed, she would increase the amounts she played to try to increase her winnings. As she continued to lose, she would convince herself that she would win a lot, but even so, at the end of the day, she would be angry with herself, feel a lot of guilt and stress, and put herself down.

Excessive gambling caused her many problems and was part of the reason that her marriage broke up. She lost a lot of money gambling … sometimes her entire pay. When she used that up, she would borrow money either personally, or on her credit cards or line of credit. When those were no longer available, she sold some of her belongings. Because she was using all of her money to gamble, she could not pay her debts and had no money to buy food and other essentials. On one occasion, she even offered sexual favours in exchange for money to an acquaintance she ran into at the casino. Fortunately, she was turned down by the person, who suggested she get some help with her gambling, but the incident only added to her shame.

However, it was a wakeup call to her, and she said that she is now ready to quit. She said that a person must look at his or her own situation and decide if the losing of money constitutes a problem for the individual. If it does, the person must accept that if addicted, you can’t just put a cap on the gambling, but you must stay away from it altogether. She felt that one-on-one counselling would be of benefit to her, and was currently seeking referral to an Aboriginal therapist.

She said she went to GA a few times, but it depressed her to hear of all the struggle of so many people, and the meetings were long, so she stopped going. Nevertheless, she said that she did feel the support and understanding of other people at the meetings, but she quit anyway. She concluded that she was not ready to quit, at that time.

With regard to Aboriginal programs and services, she supports this very much. She thought that the spiritual aspects of traditional teachings would be key element, and that recovery and healing would be facilitated by traditional ceremonies. Moreover, she believed that an Aboriginal person would be more comfortable, culturally and socially, in an Aboriginal group. In such a setting, she felt a person could receive more heart-felt support.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Ottawa Aboriginal Community

181

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community

Prepared by:

Glen Lipinski Research Coordinator

and the

Thunder Bay Local Research Advisory Committee

Thunder Bay, Ontario

March 31, 2005

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community

182

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...... 184

1. INTRODUCTION...... 185

1.1 Background ...... 185

1.2 Participants ...... 185

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION ...... 186

3. RESEARCH ...... 187

3.1 Purpose and Goals ...... 187

3.2 Research Questions...... 187

3.3 Methods ...... 188

3.3.1 Community Survey/Poll ...... 188

3.3.2 Focus Groups...... 189

3.3.3 Key Informant Interviews...... 190

3.3.4 Case Study Interviews...... 190

4. FINDINGS ...... 190

5. CONCLUSIONS...... 204

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire ...... 209

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide ...... 213

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire...... 214

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework ...... 215

APPENDIX V Case Studies ...... 216

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 183

List of Tables

TABLE 1 Suggested Prevalence of Gambling Activity...... 191

TABLE 2 Gambling Activity...... 191

TABLE 3 Gambling Activity and Frequency...... 193

TABLE 4 Duration of Play/Session by Gambler Sub-Type ...... 194

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure ...... 194

TABLE 6 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Gamblers...... 195

TABLE 7 Education and Income...... 196

TABLE 8 Aboriginal Ancestry...... 196

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers ...... 197

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type...... 198

(N=223 gamblers) ...... 198

TABLE 11 Attributable behaviours by sub-type ...... 198

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type ...... 199

TABLE 13 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Problem Gamblers ...... 201

TABLE 14 Education and Income of Problem Gamblers...... 201

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of Problem Gamblers ...... 202

TABLE 16 Aboriginal Ancestry of Problem Gamblers...... 202

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 184

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to understand gambling within the Aboriginal cultural context in Thunder Bay and to develop culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies to address this serious health issue in the Aboriginal community of Thunder Bay.

We identified the gamblers through use of community surveys. We collected data on what types of gambling are most prevalent. Our main sources of data were the Métis and First Nations citizens of Thunder Bay and surrounding area. Our data were collected using a variety of methods such as a community survey, focus groups, key informant interviews and case studies.

Gambling in the Thunder Bay area is defined as an activity where you spend money in hopes of making more money through activities such as lottery tickets, scratch tickets, bingo, and casino gambling. Problem gambling is further defined as spending more money than you can afford, returning to win back your losses and experiencing problems with family and social life due to excessive gambling.

The overall prevalence of gambling and problem gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community is high. Availability and accessibility to gambling activities are sited as probable causes.

The Aboriginal gambler and problem gambler in Thunder Bay is male, age 30-49 yrs with a lower than average income. The largest numbers of gamblers/problem gamblers come from the ranks of the unemployed and/or employed in lower paying jobs such as cleaners/labourers.

The information gathered through this study will help Aboriginal community members to understand and further identify gambling and potential problem gambling issues and activities that clearly are affecting them today. The data collected will provide the foundation for an action plan that will at some point in the future be able to address this serious health issue within the Aboriginal community in and around Thunder Bay.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 185

1. INTRODUCTION This Aboriginal gambling research project was jointly sponsor by the MNO and the OFIFC. The data collected throughout Thunder Bay and area was acquired by contacting the various Aboriginal groups and their citizens of the area. First Nations and Métis were both included in the research data. As well local agencies and professional people were consulted and interviewed.

1.1 Background Métis Nation of Ontario The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) was founded in 1993. It was established as the representative body reflecting the values and inspirations of the Métis of Ontario; the Métis being one of the Aboriginal peoples whose treaty and Aboriginal rights are recognized in Canada’s Constitution. The MNO was founded on a “rights-based” agenda, is specific to Métis only and based on a long-term vision expressed in our Statement of Prime Purpose. The structure and operations of the MNO are distinct from membership-based organizations modeled on corporations or non-profit associations. The MNO’s objectives are to design and provide programs to registered citizens rather than to simply acquire funding for existing programs. At the community level the MNO structure is such that there are 27 Community Councils across the Province which are chartered through the MNO and governed in accordance with the MNO’s Charter Agreements.

Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centers The Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres (OFIFC) was formed in July 1971. The OFIFC began mainly as a lobbying and resource agent and since has expanded its role to include the design and delivery of culturally-based training programs, program development and advocating Aboriginal development and communication. Currently, there are 28 member Centers that are located throughout the Province of Ontario. The vision of the OFIFC is to improve the quality of life for Urban Aboriginal people by supporting self-determined activities which encourage equal access and participation in Canadian society and which respect Aboriginal cultural distinctiveness.

1.2 Participants Aboriginal people from the Métis Nation of Ontario and the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres are partnering to host a gambling research project. A “Local Research Advisory Committee” was formed by local citizens to develop a local research plan and serve as a resource to provide guidance throughout the research project. Local agencies and professional key people were also used during some of the interviews.

Local Research Advisory Committee The Métis Nation of Ontario Community Council in Thunder Bay is the local sponsoring agency. The Local Research Advisory Committee, established to oversee the local project, is comprised of members from both community partners as well as other community organizations and groups. The following are members of the LRAC in Thunder Bay:

Cam Burgess, Chair of LRAC and Regional Councillor, Métis Nation of Ontario

Glen Lipinski, Gambling Research Coordinator, Métis Nation of Ontario Ken Simard, Elder for the Métis Nation of Ontario

Murray Nielson, Treatment/After Care Coordinator, Indian Friendship Centre

Verna Legarde, Problem Gambling Coordinator, Ontario Native Women’s Association.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 186

Evelyn Bakich, Gambling Councillor, Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Joseph’s Care Group

Erin Dietrich, Gambling Councillor, Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Joseph’s Care Group

Debbie Squier-Bernst, Credit Councillor, Family Services

Rick Lyons, Youth-Native Child & Family, Confederation College

Rolande Veilleux, Community Health Worker, NorWest Community Health Centers, Ogden Site

2. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION Thunder Bay is a northern community situated along the northwest shore of Lake Superior. The population of the city itself is 121,000, however, the outlying areas account for a significant additional population of which a large percentage is Aboriginal. The Aboriginal population is made up of Métis, First Nations and a small number of Inuit. The 2001 Census indicates that Thunder Bay metropolitan area has an Aboriginal population of 8,205. Thunder Bay and district has an Aboriginal population of 13,180.

Thunder Bay’s total population of people over the age of 15 is 48,380 male and 51,355 female. Of people aged 20-34, 15.9% of males have less than a high school diploma and 15.1% of females have less than a high school diploma. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of males have graduated high school and 30% of females have a high school diploma. Seventeen percent (17%) of males have a college or university degree while 21% of females have college or university degrees. Twelve percent (12%) of males and 7% of females have a trade’s education. The main industry in Thunder Bay and area is the forest industry, pulp and paper, sawmills and numerous spin-off industries associated with forestry. The average earnings per year for a full time worker are males at $51,100.00 and females at $34,800.00. Religious affiliations are mainly Catholic at 40% and Protestant at 39% with a variety of other smaller groups making up the remaining 21%.

Métis people in Thunder Bay fall within the borders of the Robinson-Superior Treaty of 1850. Many of the Métis in the area are affiliated with the Métis Nation of Ontario. The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) was organized in 1993 with the first council being formed in Thunder Bay at that time. MNO citizens have become progressively more organized over the years. Today the MNO citizens in Thunder Bay own their own community centre and host and operate a number of programs and services through the community centre. Although the official language of the Métis is michif, there are very few people in the community that can speak it. There are approximately 500 MNO citizens in the Thunder Bay area.

There are at least two other Métis groups that live in Thunder Bay, the “Ontario Métis Aboriginal Association” and “Red Sky Métis”. Both groups claim fairly significant numbers of Aboriginal people but do not require formal registration with documented proof of Aboriginal ancestry for their members.

The Fort William Reserve is situated within the City of Thunder Bay. The First Nations people that live on the Fort William Reserve have a population of 560 citizens. There are a number of other First Nations Reserves in the area such as Gull Bay (population 252), Red Rock, Longlac, Pays Plate (population 65), Aroland (population 346), Rocky Bay (population 197), McIntre Bay, Jackfish, and Lac Des Mille Lacs. There are approximately 10,300 Registered Indians in Thunder Bay and area. There are no specific population figures for First Nations people in the area that live “off Reserve”, nor are there population figures for all the reserves mentioned. The 2001 Census also reports a small Inuit population in Thunder Bay of 35 people.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 187

3. RESEARCH This research project is an exploratory initiative, designed to better understand gambling and problem gambling in Thunder Bay. Below you will find a purpose statement, research goals, and research questions.

3.1 Purpose and Goals The purpose of this research is to understand gambling within the Aboriginal cultural context in Thunder Bay and to develop culturally relevant stimulus and action strategies to address this serious health issue in the Aboriginal community of Thunder Bay.

There were five main goals:

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Goal Five: To develop an “action plan” designed to address problem gambling issues identified through the community research (deferred to a later phase of the project).

3.2 Research Questions This research was designed to address the following research questions:

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity.

Research Question 1 – What activities do community members define as gambling? Research Question 2 – What is the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community? Research Question 3 – What types of gambling activities do community members engage in? Research Question 4 – Where and when do community members gamble? Research Question 5 – How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble? Research Question 6 – How much money do community members spend on gambling? Research Question 7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Research Question 8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community.

Research Question 1 – What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 188

Research Question 2 – What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Research Question 3 – What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Research Question 4 – What are the consequences of problem gambling for the individual, family, friends, and others in the community? Research Question 5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Research Question 6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values).

Research Question 1 – How knowledgeable are community members, gamblers and problem gamblers about problem gambling? Research Question 2 – How aware, and/or concerned are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Research Question 3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others.

Research Question 1 – What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Research Question 2 – How knowledgeable are community members, gamblers and problem gamblers about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Research Question 3 – What are the preferences of community members, gamblers and problem gamblers for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

3.3 Methods The methods of research for this project included a community survey, focus groups, key informant interviews and case studies. Each of these methods is discussed below, along with the means for sampling, data collection and data analysis.

3.3.1 Community Survey/Poll A community survey was conducted to obtain information on how community members are involved in gambling, how much they participate and their experience about gambling.

Sampling The sampling was carried out throughout the Aboriginal community. A total of 303 Aboriginal people were sampled, 167 or 55.1% were male and 136 or 44.9% were female. Métis and First Nations citizens were contacted and asked to participate. As great a balanced, cross-section of people as possible were sampled. Gamblers as well as problem gamblers were included. Adults, male and female, seniors and young adults were all surveyed. The sample included employed as well as unemployed people and various income levels. People that live in the city and in the surrounding countryside were contacted. Sampling was carried out through use of phone surveys, limited use of door-to-door surveys of known Aboriginal people were used as well as attendance at specific

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 189

Aboriginal functions to gather survey data. Central public displays in areas such as malls and shopping centres’ was also used. A table was set up with signs explaining the survey and Aboriginal people were invited to participate. Aboriginal events and meetings were attended and surveys were passed out for completion by interested people.

Instruments Data was collected using the demographic questions and the first seventeen questions of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. The first portion of the survey requested basic demographic information. Questions 1-5 dealt with specific gambling activities, frequency and money spent on each activity. Questions 6-17 invited multiple choice responses to questions pertaining to the issues surrounding gambling. (see Appendix I). In the case of phone surveying, interviewers read the questions and fill out the responses for each person surveyed. In the door-to-door, Aboriginal functions and/or public display areas, respondents were asked to fill out the survey themselves.

Analysis Questionnaires provide quantitative data and statistical information. All the raw data from 305 written surveys was coded and entered into a database for analysis. The analysis, using SPSS software produced descriptive statistics such as averages and percentages that are included as findings in the final report.

3.3.2 Focus Groups Focus groups were conducted to gather a group perspective on the community attitudes, values and perceptions of gambling and problem gambling. A facilitator guided the group throughout the discussion, keeping the group on topic and productive, while collecting a more broad-based sample of opinions.

Sampling Six different focus groups were organized, using 7 to 10 Aboriginal participants with common characteristics. Groups were organized by age, such as youth ages 16 – 25, adults ages 26 – 55, seniors or elders ages 56 and up. Groups were also organized by gender: one group each of male and female youth, one group each of male and female adults, and one group each of male and female elders for a total of six groups. Through discussion of open-ended questions, the sampling of opinions took place through group discussion. The focus groups were held at our own Métis Community Centre, the Indian Friendship Centre and the NorWest Community Health Centers, Ogden Site.

Instruments The data were collected through use of facilitated groups of people. Data were collected using the discussion guide questions in Appendix II. Through the use of these predetermined questions and topics for discussion, quality data was gathered. Through the collection of various ideas and suggestions, pertinent data may be expanded on and added to through use of the groups’ discussion. Data collection took place in a comfortable and relaxed atmosphere encouraging free flow of information. Note taking and tape recording of sessions was the primary source for the gathering of the information. In each case, permission to use a tape recorder was obtained. Comfortable free- flowing inter-action was maintained at all times.

Analysis The data collected here was qualitative data. All perspectives and opinions gathered through conversation, note taking and tape recording was compiled and summarized. Each response was correlated back to the list of guiding questions and goals then included in the final report.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 190

3.3.3 Key Informant Interviews Ten key informant interviews were conducted to gather data from people within the community that have access to gambling-related information from a unique perspective. Key informants have special knowledge and an overview of the Aboriginal community and gambling that is perhaps not shared by all citizens.

Sampling Key informants such as community and municipal leaders, as well as programs and services department and agency heads were contacted and asked to participate. Specific questions (twelve of them) as outlined in Appendix III were asked of the key informant during the personal interview. Ten key informants were interviewed. Representatives were selected from the following sectors: police department (1), health services (2), social services (2), addictions services (2), education (1), local politician (1) and community Elder (1).

Instruments A guiding list of twelve questions was used to obtain the required data and promote topical responses. Each key informant was asked the same guiding questions and they were allowed to respond as they saw fit. (see Appendix III)

Analysis The data gathered from each key informant was recorded during the personal interview and then later transcribed to written report. These summarized responses to the questions provided qualitative data. The data was analyzed for its content. Each response was correlated back to the list of guiding questions and goals then included in the final report.

3.3.4 Case Study Interviews Case studies were developed by interviewing problem gamblers and have them describe their own individual cases. We were able to acquire useful data on problem gambling by using this intense exploration method of individual problem gambling cases. The interviews were conducted in a location selected by the interviewee for their comfort and privacy.

Sampling Four problem gamblers were sampled. To obtain the four participants, we were assisted by the Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Josephs Care Group and the NorWest Community Health Centre – Ogden Site. Good listening skills and a responsive, flexible, flowing interview provided for some very interesting data collection.

Instruments A total of seven guiding questions were used to encourage the individual to relate their gambling history, general life story and addiction problems in a narrative form. The individual was allowed to relate their story in their own words (see Appendix IV).

Analysis The data gathered from each case history was recorded then later transcribed to written report. Each interview was developed into a written narrative and included in the final report.

4. FINDINGS The findings are presented as a summary of the research data that was collected. All data collected was obtained by use of one or more of the research methods as described under 3.3 “Methods”. The findings are organized by the goal areas and the specific research questions that were developed within the local research plan.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 191

Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Focus Groups The focus groups indicated that gambling is an activity where you spend money in hopes of gaining more money. The community members considered the following legal activities as gambling: casinos, bingo halls, purchase of lottery tickets, scratch tickets, pull tickets, sports betting and raffles to name a few.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community?

Community Survey Table # 1 shows the results from the survey suggesting the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community. The community survey clearly shows that 89% of Aboriginal people surveyed, gamble.

TABLE 1 Suggested Prevalence of Gambling Activity

Gamblers Non-Gamblers Total Demographics N % N % N %

Total Respondents 270 89.1 33 10.9 303 100%

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that the prevalence of gambling in Thunder Bay is quite high at (70-75%) due to the observed attendance at Casinos and Bingo Halls. The focus groups reported seeing high numbers of Aboriginal people at both of these venues. The groups also indicated that the prevalence was high due to lotto, scratch and pull ticket sales and sports betting.

Key Informants Key informants thought that the perceived prevalence of gambling was fairly significant (5% or more) due to the high numbers of people seen attending Casino’s and Bingo Halls.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Community Survey Table # 2 shows the types of gambling activities community members engage in according to the written survey results. The top four listed activities are lottery tickets, scratch tickets, bingo and slots in the casino. TABLE 2 Gambling Activity

Gamblers/Game (N=270)

Gambling Activity N % R

Lottery tickets 162 60.0 1

Instant win or scratch tickets 150 55.6 2

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 192

Gamblers/Game (N=270)

Gambling Activity N % R

Bingo 109 40.4 3

Coin slots in a casino 100 37.03 4

Raffles or fund raising tickets 69 25.6 5 Card/board games with family or 61 22.6 6 friends Casino games other than coin slots 56 20.7 7 (poker, blackjack, roulette, Keno) Games of skill (pool, golf, bowling, 40 14.8 8 darts) Sport Select 39 14.4 9 Card games in non-regulated 21 7.8 10 settings Daily lottery 21 7.8 11

Sports pools 20 7.4 12

VLTs in a bar or lounge 19 7.04 13 Games at Casio’s outside of 19 7.3 14 province i.e. - Las Vegas Outcome of sporting events 17 6.3 15

Arcade or Video games for money 16 5.9 16

Internet gambling 13 4.8 17

Horse races (live or off-track) 12 4.4 18

Stocks, options, commodities 12 4.4 19

Sports with a bookie 1 .4 20

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Focus Groups Whereas the location of gambling was not specifically addressed, the focus groups suggested that gambling at bingo almost always takes place in the evening. The focus groups indicated that community members gambled at casino’s mostly during the daytime but with some evening activity. Most groups thought that the end of the month, weekends, after work and during holidays were the most popular times for people to gamble.

Question 5: How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

Community Survey Table # 3 addresses when community members gamble and gives an indication of the number of community members who gamble at least once or more on a weekly basis. Lottery tickets, scratch tickets, bingo and casino slots have the highest percentage of people attending on a weekly basis.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 193

TABLE 3 Gambling Activity and Frequency

Gamblers/Game Players/Game (N=270) Who Gamble Weekly

Gambling Activity N % R N % R

Lottery tickets 162 60.0 1 60 22.2 1

Instant win or scratch tickets 150 55.6 2 31 11.5 2

Bingo 109 40.4 3 28 10.4 3

Coin slots in a casino 100 37.03 4 22 8.1 4

Sport Select 39 14.4 9 14 5.2 5 Casino games other than coin slots (poker, blackjack, roulette, 56 20.7 7 13 4.8 6 Keno) Card/board games with family or 61 22.6 6 13 4.8 7 friends Games of skill (pool, golf, 40 14.8 8 10 3.7 8 bowling, darts) Internet gambling 13 4.8 17 4 1.5 9 Card games in non-regulated 21 7.8 10 3 1.1 10 settings Daily lottery 21 7.8 11 3 1.1 11

Outcome of sporting events 17 6.3 15 3 1.1 12

Sports pools 20 7.4 12 3 1.1 13 Arcade or Video games for 16 5.9 16 3 1.1 14 money Raffles or fund raising tickets 69 25.6 5 2 .7 15

VLTs in a bar or lounge 19 7.04 13 1 .4 16

Horse races (live or off-track) 12 4.4 18 1 .4 17

Stocks, options, commodities 12 4.4 19 0 0 18 Games at Casio’s outside of 19 7.3 14 0 0 19 province i.e. - Las Vegas Sports with a bookie 1 .4 20 0 0 20

Table # 4 shows the duration of play per activity for community members by gambler sub-type. The activities that gamblers spend three hours or more are bingo, coin slots in casinos, casino games, card games and board games played at home and other games of skill.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 194

TABLE 4 Duration of Play/Session by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Duration of a Gambling Session N % N % N % N % Lottery tickets >3 hours 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily lottery >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Instant win or scratch tickets >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 Raffles/fund raising tickets >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bingo >3 hours 5 12.8 8 20.5 16 41.0 10 25.6 Cards/board games (family) >3 hours 2 12.5 1 6.3 7 43.8 6 37.5 VLTs in a bar or lounge >3 hours 0 0 0 0 1 50.0 1 50.0 Coin slots in a casino> 3 hours 2 11.1 2 11.1 5 27.8 9 50.0 Internet gambling >3 hours 0 0 0 0 2 50.0 2 50.0 Sport Select >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sports pools >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Outcome of sporting events >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0 Sports with a bookie >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Horse races >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Casino games (not coin slots) >3 1 9.1 2 18.2 2 18.2 6 54.5 hours Stocks, options, commodities >3 0 0 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 hours Games of skill >3 hours 3 27.3 4 36.4 1 9.0 3 27.3 Card games (non-regulated) >3 hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Community Survey Table # 5 shows the median amount of money spent per month per gambling activity by community members. Coin slots at casino’s, casino games and bingo are the top ranked activities where the most money is spent.

TABLE 5 Gambling Expenditure

Median Monthly Expenditure Gambling Activity N $ R Stocks, options, commodities 302 399.34 1*

Coin slots in a casino 295 36.91 2 Casino games other than coin slots (poker, blackjack, 297 36.11 3 roulette, Keno) Bingo 287 22.44 4

Sports with a bookie 305 9.83 5

Lottery tickets 289 9.33 6

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 195

Median Monthly Expenditure Gambling Activity N $ R Instant win or scratch tickets 282 7.38 7

Games at Casio’s outside of province i.e. - Las Vegas 300 6.00 8

Outcome of sporting events 305 5.99 9

Card/board games with family or friends 290 4.98 10

Games of skill (pool, golf, bowling, darts) 301 4.08 11

Raffles or fund raising tickets 293 4.06 12

Sport Select 300 3.76 13

Internet gambling 303 1.96 14

VLTs in a bar or lounge 303 1.82 15

Sports pools 300 1.53 16

Card games in non-regulated settings 302 1.48 17

Horse races (live or off-track) 305 1.37 18

Arcade or Video games for money 303 .85 19

Daily lottery 295 .76 20

*Readers should note that the median monthly expenditures indicated for “stocks, options, commodities” are based on results from just one (1) respondent. Although it is ranked number 1 in this table as a gambling activity it may not give a clear indication of over all community activity.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey The following four tables (numbers 6, 7, 8 and 9) provide a demographic profile of Aboriginal gamblers in the Thunder Bay area, showing gender, age, marital status, education, income, Aboriginal ancestry and the number of minors living in the home. In terms of gender, males are the higher percentage of gamblers. The age groups 30-39 yrs. and 40- 49 yrs. have the highest percentage of gamblers. People that report as being single have the largest number of gamblers within their marital status classification.

TABLE 6 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Gamblers

Demographic Variables Gamblers N % Gender Male 153 56.7 Female 117 43.3 Age 16-24 53 20.5 25-29 32 12.4 30-39 58 22.4

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 196

Demographic Variables Gamblers N % 40-49 63 24.3 50-59 39 15.1 60-64 6 2.3 65 and over 8 3.1 Marital Status Single 78 35.1 Married 58 26.1 Common-Law 42 18.9 Divorced/Separated 36 16.2 Widowed 8 3.6

Table # 7 shows the amount of education and income reported by respondents to the survey.

TABLE 7 Education and Income

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Education Elementary School 18 8.2 High School 73 33.3 College, Technical, University 101 46.1 Advanced Degree 27 12.3 Annual Household Income Less than $20,000 86 43.2 $20,000-$39,000 55 27.6 $40,000-$59,000 30 15.1 $60,000-$79.000 16 8.1 $80,000 and over 12 6.0

The respondents in the survey are quite well educated with 46% and 33% respectively having at least a high school education or better. As far as income is concerned, those with the lower annual income ($20,000 or less) are the highest percentage of gamblers.

Aboriginal ancestry is shown in Table # 8. Within the Aboriginal community in Thunder Bay the First Nations people reported in the survey as having the largest number of gamblers. No one who responded to the survey claimed to be Inuit and some of those people surveyed were not sure whether they were Métis or First Nation but they were confident that they were Aboriginal.

TABLE 8 Aboriginal Ancestry

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Aboriginal Ancestry First Nation 131 64.9 Métis 66 32.7 Inuit 0 0.0 Unknown 5 2.5

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 197

Table # 9 indicates the number of minor children living in the gambler’s household. The majority of gamblers reported that there were no minors living in the same household. Of the households reporting minors most have only one or two minors living in the home. (Minors are defined as persons’ under the age of eighteen).

TABLE 9 Minor Children Living in Residence with Gamblers

Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Number Under 18 Residing One minor 53 24.2 Two minors 33 15.1 3 minors 15 6.8 4 minors 8 3.7 None 110 50.2

Focus Groups The focus groups described the gamblers as older people (retirees, elders); people on welfare or social assistance. The indication was that pretty much all walks of life and all social levels were involved: young, old, male, female, construction workers to office workers, a real general mix.

Key Informant The key informants thought that lower income people, women and seniors/elders were most likely to be gamblers. They also indicated that gambling was taking place pretty much across the board at all social and economic levels. Some identified gamblers as community leaders, professionals and working people.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in Thunder Bay?

Focus Groups The people in the focus groups spoke only of card games at home for money as traditional gambling practices from their background, traditions and customs.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that problem gamblers were people who are gambling with money that they don’t have and in some cases borrowing money for gambling. Problem gamblers spend their extra money or savings to gamble and make gambling a daily routine. People who deny that they have a problem yet continue to spend beyond their means and people who neglect their regular day to day duties in order to continually gamble are indicated as being problem gamblers as well. The groups thought that problem gambling occurs when it interferes with your eating habits, your sleeping habits and your family life and job. Problem gamblers often steal and lie to support their gambling habits.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 198

Community Survey Although the sample was not a randomly selected sample of Aboriginals in Thunder Bay, Table # 10 offers the “suggested” prevalence of problem gambling in the community from the sample that completed the community survey questionnaire. Whereas caution needs to be considered in interpreting the findings from the survey, the “suggested” prevalence of problem gamblers is 19.3%.

TABLE 10 Problem Gambling Prevalence by Gambler Sub-Type (N=223 gamblers)

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers (PGSI=0) (PGSI=1-2) (PGSI=3-7) (PGSI=8+) 88 37 55 43 39.5% 16.6% 24.7% 19.3%

Note: The survey sample size is 303; however, there are 47 respondents who do not have complete scores for the 9 PGSI items (i.e., these people cannot be identified as NPGs, LRGs, MRGs, or PGs so they are left out). There were also 33 non-gamblers in the sample.

Focus Groups Perception of problem gambling with the focus groups varied but the majority thought it was quite high, at as much as 25%. The perceived prevalence of problem gambling is high because of the number of casinos in the area and the easy access to money through the growing number of money marts, credit cards and general credit availability.

Question 3: What are the behaviors attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Community Survey Table # 11 shows personal and social behaviours experienced by problem gamblers such as health problems, feeling guilty and having financial problems as a result of their gambling.

TABLE 11 Attributable behaviours by sub-type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Attributable Behaviours N % N % N % N %

Personal Consequences Bet more than can afford to lose Never 88 100.0 26 70.3 18 32.7 3 7.0 Sometimes 0 0 10 27.0 31 56.4 19 44.2 Most of the time 0 0 1 2.7 4 7.3 13 30.2 Almost always 0 0 0 0 2 3.6 8 18.6 Spend more than you wanted Never 78 88.6 18 48.6 10 18.2 1 2.3 Sometimes 8 9.1 19 51.4 37 67.3 18 41.9 Most of the time 1 1.1 0 0 4 7.3 16 37.2 Almost always 0 0 0 0 1 1.8 8 18.6 Need to gamble with larger amounts

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 199

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Never 88 100.0 32 86.5 35 63.6 2 4.7 Sometimes 0 0 5 13.5 17 30.9 22 51.2 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 3 5.5 11 25.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18.6 Tried to win money back Never 88 100.0 27 73.0 27 49.1 4 9.3 Sometimes 0 0 10 27.0 24 43.6 20 46.5 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 4 7.3 14 32.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11.6 Borrow money or sold anything Never 88 100.0 32 86.5 46 83.6 8 18.6 Sometimes 0 0 5 13.5 8 14.5 28 65.1 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 14.0 Almost always 0 0 0 0 1 1.8 1 2.3 Social Consequences

Lied to family and others Never 88 100.0 35 94.6 44 80.0 16 37.2 Sometimes 0 0 2 5.4 9 16.4 17 39.5 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 2 3.6 5 11.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9.3

Key Informants The key informants spoke of attributable behaviors as being: talking about gambling a lot, talking about winning – never about losing, giving up or selling important family or personal items, difficult to work with or be around at times, making gambling their top priority, playing with more money than they have, hiding their behaviors and activities, broken trusts, spending more time away from home, lying and making excuses and are often in denial about their gambling. More and more frequent visits to pawn shops, realignment and changing their focus on life, with more focus on gambling and obvious separation of themselves from society.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Community Survey Problem gamblers in Table # 12 indicate that they have health problems, feel guilty and have financial problems as a result of their gambling.

TABLE 12 Adverse Consequences by Gambler Sub-Type

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Adverse Consequences N % N % N % N %

Personal Consequences Health problems (stress and anxiety) Never 88 100.0 33 89.2 40 72.2 8 18.6 Sometimes 0 0 4 10.8 14 25.5 22 51.2

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 200

Non-Problem Low Risk Moderate Risk Problem Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Gamblers Most of the time 0 0 0 0 1 1.8 10 23.3 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7.0 Felt had gambling problem Never 88 100.0 36 97.3 29 52.7 2 4.7 Sometimes 0 0 1 2.7 26 47.3 21 48.8 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 25.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 20.9 Felt like to stop gambling Never 87 98.9 31 83.8 35 63.6 4 9.3 Sometimes 0 0 6 16.2 16 29.1 23 53.5 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 25.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 2 3.6 3 7.0 People criticized gambling Never 88 100.0 32 86.5 40 72.7 5 11.6 Sometimes 0 0 5 13.5 15 27.3 19 44.2 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 32.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11.6 Felt guilty Never 88 100.0 28 75.7 14 25.5 3 7.0 Sometimes 0 0 9 24.3 37 67.3 15 34.9 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 2 3.6 14 32.6 Almost always 0 0 0 0 2 3.6 11 25.6 Social Consequences Financial problems for gambler or household Never 88 100.0 34 91.9 28 50.9 4 9.3 Sometimes 0 0 3 8.1 26 47.3 20 46.5 Most of the time 0 0 0 0 1 1.8 9 20.9 Almost always 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 23.3

Key Informants The key informants thought that some of the adverse consequences attributable to problem gambling in the community were: children going without food, clothing and proper care while parents are gambling, loss of jobs, sense of helplessness, loss of life savings, disruption of family life, failing health (i.e.-too much smoke, not eating properly, lack of proper sleep), more bankruptcies, abuse of credit, increased crime and more visible emotional stress.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Community Survey A demographic profile of problem gamblers in the community is presented in the following three (3) tables. These tables show us the gender, age, marital status, education and income, employment status/occupation and their Aboriginal ancestry.

Aboriginal problem gamblers in the Thunder Bay area by gender, age and marital status are presented in Table #13. In terms of gender, males are the higher percentage of problem gamblers. Age groups show that the middle age groups have the higher number of problem gamblers. Marital status

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 201 indicates that those listed as living common law and those that report being single have the highest percentage of problem gamblers.

TABLE 13 Gender, Age and Marital Status of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Gender Male 25 58.1 Female 18 41.9 Age 16-24 7 17.1 25-29 7 17.1 30-39 10 24.4 40-49 11 26.9 50-59 6 14.6 60-69 0 0.0 70 and over 0 0.0 Marital Status Single 13 30.2 Married 10 23.3 Common-Law 13 30.2 Divorced/Separated 5 11.6 Widowed 2 4.7

Table #14 shows the education and income levels of problem gamblers. The problem gamblers in the Thunder Bay area are fairly well educated and tend to have at least a high school education with a strongest percentage having college and university schooling as well. The problem gamblers tend to have the lowest annual household incomes.

TABLE 14 Education and Income of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Education Elementary School 3 7.0 High School 18 41.9 College, Technical, University 21 48.8 Advanced Degree 1 2.3 Annual Household Income Less than $20,000 18 51.4 $20,000-$39,000 11 31.4 $40,000-$59,000 5 14.3 $60,000-$79.000 0 0.0 $80,000 and over 1 2.9

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 202

Table #15 presents employment status and occupations of problem gamblers. As far as employment status, those that are unemployed have the highest percentage of problem gamblers. Laborers and cleaners have the highest percentage of problem gamblers in their field of occupation.

TABLE 15 Employment Status and Occupation of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Employment Status Employed full-time (30 or more hrs/week) 5 13.9 Employed part-time (less than 30hrs/week) 6 16.7 Unemployed (out of work but looking for work) 12 33.3 Student: employed part-time or full-time 0 0.0 Student: not employed 5 13.9 Retired 2 5.6 Homemaker 6 16.7 Occupation Contractors, operators, supervisors 7 22.6 School teachers/counsellors 2 6.5 Retail sales/clerks 1 3.2 Secretaries, recorders, transcriptionists 2 6.5 Labourer, cleaner 13 41.9 Student 2 6.5 Child care and home support workers 4 12.9

The problem gamblers’ Aboriginal Ancestry is shown in Table #16. First Nations’ people have the highest number of problem gamblers and also the largest amount of community members at risk of becoming problem gamblers.

TABLE 16 Aboriginal Ancestry of Problem Gamblers

Problem Gamblers Demographic Variables N % Aboriginal Ancestry First Nation 33 84.6 Métis 6 15.4 Inuit 0 0.0 Unknown 0 0.0

Please note: The survey sample size is 303, which includes 270 gamblers and 33 non gamblers. However, there are 47 gamblers who do not have complete scores for the 9 PGSI items, so these people cannot be identified as NPGs, LRGs, MRGs or PGs. As a result these 47 gamblers are excluded from the prevalence rate calculation; therefore, percentage rates are based on scores for 223 gamblers and not the total 270 gamblers.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 203

Question 6: Does problem gambling in Thunder Bay differ from problem gambling in the past?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that there is more problem gambling now because of the two casinos that are operating in the Thunder Bay area. Gambling in general seems to be more open and accepted today. Most gambling in the past was in private clubs or in peoples’ homes. There are many different types of gambling available today and gambling is a much more socially acceptable activity. The focus groups thought that today it is easier to get started gambling and therefore easier to become a problem gambler.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Key Informants The key informants thought that generally speaking the community members and the problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable about problem gambling. Most people seem to have the stereo typed vision of the “Las Vegas” type gambler and are not really aware of the realities surrounding problem gambling. There seems to be a general lack of understanding even as to what or who a problem gambler might be. It was thought that the community has no idea of the seriousness of problem gambling.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Key Informants The key informants thought there was a general lack of concern and perhaps don’t even think there is any problem gambling. It was thought that because casino gambling in particular is so new that perhaps people are unaware of any problems existing.

Case Studies The case studies thought that most community members do not think there is any problem but maybe do not fully understand problem gambling because socially accepted activities like bingo are a frequent and accepted pastime.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Focus Groups The focus groups felt that community members felt sorry for people with gambling problems and their families. Some felt that there was genuine community concern and in some cases people with problems were looked down on. There was also the idea that as long as it’s not affecting me it’s not my problem and perhaps people in general don’t really care. It is believed by the focus groups that gambling problems are more acceptable than other addictions and generally may not be viewed as a problem. It was reported that in some cases people in the community that don’t participate and go to bingo at least once or more per week are viewed as snobs or as being cheap or anti- social.

Key Informant Interviews The key informants thought that community members generally look down on problem gamblers but at the same time believe that “it could never happen to me”. They thought that there was a fair amount of

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 204 whispering and finger pointing toward those with gambling problems and that they are perceived as having a weakness.

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Key Informants The key informants indicated that the telephone hotline number was available and that the Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Joseph’s Care Group was there, as well as Credit Counselling services. Gamblers Anonymous is also mentioned by key informants. They also mentioned that the Métis Nation of Ontario may have assistance available for Aboriginal gambling addiction.

Case Studies The case studies thought that there is a program at the Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Joseph’s Care Group and that maybe there was a gambler’s anonymous group but generally there was not much available.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Focus Groups The focus groups thought that community members and problem gamblers for the most part don’t know what programs or services exist. They indicated that there are no Aboriginal specific programs available, so community members will not know of them. It was generally thought that community members may feel there are some services available but do not know how or where to access them.

Key Informants The key informants thought that the community members and the problem gamblers were not very knowledgeable at all about what resources are available.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Key Informants The key informants thought that more counselling was needed and there is a need to learn more and better coping skills. It was also felt that courses on stress management and life skills would be appropriate. In general more public education, more talking circles and more group counselling would all assist problem gamblers.

Case Studies The case studies indicated that there was a need for more public warnings about the dangers of gambling perhaps through increased advertising and public awareness campaigns. They also thought that more counselling was the preferred method of assistance for problem gamblers.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Goal One: To Describe the Nature and Practice of Gambling as a Community Socio-cultural Activity.

Question 1: What activities do community members define as gambling?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 205

Conclusion The definition of gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community is that gambling is an activity where you spend money in hopes of gaining more money while engaged in one or more gambling activities. These practices often include the following legal activities such as lottery ticket, scratch ticket, bingo, casino gambling.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of gambling in the community?

Conclusion The “perceived” prevalence of gambling within the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community is high. The overall “suggested” prevalence of gambling among Aboriginal people in Thunder Bay is 89%. This conclusion is reinforced by the observation that the attendance is high at casino’s and bingo halls in Thunder Bay. People reported seeing high numbers of Aboriginal people at both of these venues.

Question 3: What types of gambling activities do community members engage in?

Conclusion The top four activities that community members engage in are lottery tickets, instant win or scratch tickets, bingos, coin slots in casinos.

Question 4: Where and when do community members gamble?

Conclusion Since the top four activities are lottery ticket, scratch ticket, bingo and slots in casino gambling, the obvious location for this gambling is at any location where gambling tickets are sold, bingo halls and gambling casinos. Gambling at bingo almost always takes place in the evening. Community members gamble at casino’s mostly during the daytime but with some evening activity. The end of the month, weekends, after work and during holidays are also popular times to gamble.

Question 5: How frequently and for how long/session, do community members gamble?

Conclusion Of the gamblers that play lottery tickets, 22% do so at least once per week or more. Of the gamblers that play scratch tickets, 11% do so at least once per week or more. Of the gamblers that play bingo, 10% do so at least once per week or more and those that gamble at casinos, 8% do so at least once a week or more.

Whereas the purchasing of lottery tickets and scratch tickets take very little time, those activities that gamblers spend three hours or more are bingo, coin slots in casinos, casino games, card games and board games played at home and other games of skill.

Question 6: How much money do community members spend on gambling?

Conclusion The gamblers in the community are spending the most money on casinos, bingos and tickets (lottery, scratch and pull). The amount of money spent on gambling varies greatly from $20.00 per day to at times spending up to $1,500.00 per night. The median monthly expenditure for community members gambling at casino slot machines is $36.91.

Question 7: Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 206

Conclusion The gamblers in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community as defined from our survey results are males aged 30-49 years of age and they are single. They are fairly well educated with the majority having high school along with college or university educations. The income level of the Aboriginal gambler in Thunder Bay is quite low at $20,000 or less per year. The largest percent of reported gamblers are unemployed and of those that work the majority are employed as labourers and cleaners. Of the Aboriginal groups represented in Thunder Bay, the First Nations people have the highest number of gamblers.

Question 8: What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been continued or abandoned by Aboriginal community members in Thunder Bay.

Conclusion Playing card games at home for money is the only gambling practice that has been continued from local Aboriginal traditions and customs.

Goal Two: To Describe the Definition, Characteristics and Pervasiveness of Problem Gambling in the Community

Question 1: What do community members define as “problem gambling”?

Conclusion Problem gambling is betting/spending more than you can afford, increasing wagers, returning to try to win back losses, borrowing money to gamble and lying about your gambling. Problem gamblers are people who are gambling with money that they don’t have and in some cases borrow money for gambling. Problem gambling causes problems such as interfering with eating habits, sleeping patterns and family and working life.

Question 2: What is the perceived prevalence of problem gambling in the community?

Conclusion Based on the information provided by the focus groups, the conclusion drawn here is that the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community is quite “high”. Although the community survey sample was not a randomly selected sample, the findings support the conclusion that the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling is relatively high.

Question 3: What are the behaviors attributable to problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion The behaviors attributable to problem gambling are talking about winning – never about losing, giving up or selling important family or personal items, difficult to work with or to be around at times, making gambling the top priority, playing with more money than they have, hiding behaviors and activities, breaking trusts, spending more time away from home, lying and making excuses and denying gambling. Others behaviors include, frequent visits to pawn shops, more focus on gambling and obvious separation from society.

Question 4: What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community?

Conclusion Problem gamblers have health problems, feel guilty about their gambling and have financial problems. Other consequences include children going without food, clothing and proper care, loss of jobs, sense

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 207 of helplessness, loss of life savings, disruption of family life, bankruptcies, abuse of credit, increased crime and visible emotional stress.

Question 5: Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Conclusion The problem gamblers in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal community as defined from our survey results are males aged 30-49 yrs. and they are equally represented by both single and common-law relationships. They are fairly well educated, with the majority having high school along with college or university educations. The income level of the Aboriginal problem gambler in Thunder Bay is quite low at $20,000 or less per year. The problem gamblers have the largest percentage are unemployed and of those that do work the majority are employed as labourers and cleaners. Of the Aboriginal groups represented in Thunder Bay, the First Nations people have the highest number of problem gamblers.

Question 6: Does problem gambling in Thunder Bay differ from problem gambling in the past?

Conclusion There is definitely more gambling today due to the number of casinos and increased availability of gambling opportunities. The obvious conclusion is that there is more problem gambling than in the past.

Goal Three: To Ascertain Community Members’ Perceptions of Gambling and Problem Gambling. (i.e. Level of Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes and Values)

Question 1: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling?

Conclusion The community members and problem gamblers are not very knowledgeable about problem gambling. The community in general lacks knowledge and may not be fully aware of the nature of problem gambling.

Question 2: How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community?

Conclusion There is a general lack of concern and perhaps most community members do not even think problem gambling exists. Most community members consider gambling to be a socially acceptable pastime and do not fully understand problem gambling.

Question 3: What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Conclusion Most community members hold a concern about problem gambling and feel sorry for people with gambling problems and their families. Some community members do not care about problem gambling because it does not directly affect them (it will not happen to me) and others look down on problem gamblers (pointing fingers at those with a weakness).

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 208

Goal Four: To Ascertain Help Seeking Preferences and Behaviours of Problem Gamblers and Concerned Significant Others

Question 1: What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion Community members identified the telephone hotline number, the Sister Margaret Smith Centre at St. Joseph’s Care Group and the Credit Counselling services. There was also some speculation that there may be a Gambler’s Anonymous group but, generally, it was felt that there is not much in the way of resources available.

Question 2: How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Conclusion Community members and problem gamblers for the most part do not know what programs or services exist. The community does not know about Aboriginal-specific programs that are available in Thunder Bay. The community members feel that there is some services available but they do not know how or where to access them.

Question 3: What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Conclusion The community members suggest that more public education, more counselling and more talking circles are needed. The problem gamblers suggest a need for more public warnings about the dangers of gambling through increased advertising and public awareness campaigns and more counselling.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 209

APPENDIX I Community Survey Questionnaire Abbreviated Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) Questions:

1-5 Thinking about the past 12 months, please check (in Q1 column) all the gambling activities in column one that you have engaged in. If you did not check any activities, you are finished and please turn in your questionnaire. If you checked any of the activities, please complete the other four columns for each activity you participated in by using the legend on the next page.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Activities How Often #Minutes $ Spend Largest $ Gambling Activities (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) (see legend) Gambling tickets 1. Lottery tickets (e.g. 649, Super 7, POGO) 2. Daily lottery tickets (e.g. Pick 3) 3. Instant-win or scratch tickets (e.g. break- open, pull-tab, Nevada strips) 4. Raffles or fundraising tickets

Bingo 5. Bingo

Gambling with family or friends 6. Cards or board games with family or friends (i.e. for money)

Electronic gambling 7. Video lottery terminals (VLTs) (i.e. in bar or restaurant lounge) 8. Casino slot machines 9. Arcade or video games for money 10. Gambling on the Internet Sports betting 11. Sport Select (e.g. Pro Line, Over/Under, Point Spread) 12. Sports pools [formal (e.g. charity- sponsored) or informal (e.g. at work)] 13. Outcome of sporting events (i.e. other than sports pool or Sports Select) 14. Sports with a bookie

Horse racing 15. Horse races (i.e. live at track and/or off-track)

Casinos 16. Games at Provincial casinos [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] 17. Games at casinos outside of Province (e.g. Las Vegas, Regina) [i.e. other than coin slots or VLTs (e.g. poker, blackjack, roulette)] Speculative investments 18. Stocks, options, commodities markets (i.e. not mutual funds or RRSPs) Other gambling 19. Games of skill for money (e.g. pool, golf, bowling, darts) 20. Card games in non-regulated settings other than with family/friends (e.g. card rooms)

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 210

21. Any other form of gambling (______specify)

LEGEND

Question Response Q1. Have you bet or spent money on this activity? Check all that apply Q2. How often did you bet or spend money on this 1. Daily activity? 2. 2-6 times/week 3. About once/week 4. 2-3 times/month 5. About once/month 6. 6-11 times/year 7. 1-5 times/year 8. Never in the past year 9. Don’t know 10. No response Q3. How many minutes/hours do you normally spend on this activity each time you play? Total number of minutes Q4. How much money, not including winnings, did you spend on this activity in a typical month? Total number of dollars Q5. What is the largest amount of money you have spent on this activity in any one day? Total number of dollars

6.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

7.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you bet or spent more money than you wanted to on gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

8.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you needed to gamble with larger amounts of money to get the same feeling of excitement?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 211

9.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you gone back another day to try to win back the money you lost?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

10.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you borrowed money or sold anything to get money to gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

11.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you lied to family members or others to hide your gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

12.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

13.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt like you would like to stop betting money or gambling, but didn’t think you could?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

14.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have people criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether or not you thought it was true?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 212

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

15.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

16.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has gambling caused you any health problems, including stress or anxiety?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

17.Thinking about the past twelve (12) months, how often has your gambling caused any financial problems for you or your household?

1. Never 2. Sometimes 3. Most of the Time 4. Almost Always 5. Don’t know 6. No response

You have reached the end of the Thunder Bay community survey. Thank you for your time and participation in this most important research project.

In the future we may conduct gambling research that is a follow-up to this study and to do this we may wish to speak to some people again. If you would like to be a part of any future gambling research that affects your community, please provide your name and telephone number below. Again any information you provide would be kept strictly confidential.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 213

APPENDIX II Focus Group Discussion Guide

The following questions were used as prompts and topics to gather a group perspective on the attitudes, values and perception of gambling and problem gambling. A facilitator guided the group throughout the discussion, keeping the group on topic and productive, while collecting a more broad based sample of opinions.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity

Question #1 – What activities do community members define as gambling? Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #4 – Where and when do community members gamble? Question #7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #8 – What gambling practices from your background, traditions and customs have been (continued, abandoned) by community members in (your town or city)?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community

Question #1 – What do community members define as “problem gambling?” Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics? Question #6 – Does problem gambling in (your town or city) differ from problem gambling in the past?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values)

Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Question #2 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 214

APPENDIX III Key Informant Interview Questionnaire The following questions were used to gather data from people that work in or are involved in key positions around the area and have access to unique and special knowledge related to the community.

Goal One: To describe the nature and practice of gambling as a community socio-cultural activity

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of gambling in the community? Question #7 – Who are the gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Goal Two: To describe the definition, characteristics, and pervasiveness of problem gambling in the community

Question #2 – What is the “perceived” prevalence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are the behaviours attributable to problem gamblers in the community? Question #4 – What are the consequences of problem gambling for the (individual, family, friends, others) in the community? Question #5 – Who are the problem gamblers in the community and what are their demographic characteristics?

Goal Three: To ascertain community members’ perceptions of gambling and problem gambling (i.e. level of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and values)

Question #1 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about problem gambling? Question #2 – How (aware, concerned) are community members about the presence of problem gambling in the community? Question #3 – What are community members’ attitudes towards those with a gambling problem?

Goal Four: To ascertain help-seeking preferences and behaviours of problem gamblers and concerned significant others

Question #1 – What resources presently exist to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #2 – How knowledgeable are (community members, problem gamblers) about resources that are available to help problem gamblers in the community? Question #3 – What are the preferences of (community members, problem gamblers) for programs and services to assist problem gamblers?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 215

APPENDIX IV Case Study Interview Framework The following is a four-component framework used for conducting problem gambler interviews and case studies. Questions and prompts will be used to ensure that each problem gambler case study interview addresses the four components.

IX. Case history (life story, personal history and background)

X. Gambling history (beginnings and developments)

XI. Problem gambling description (behaviours, rewards and consequences)

XII. Help-seeking recommendations (this is not an attempt to convince the problem gambler to go for help but a search for the types of services, programs and help that problem gamblers would use to get help)

Using the organization provided by the four-component framework, each case study will be written up anonymously as a story of a problem gambler and a report of a problem gambler interview.

1. Begin by telling me about your personal history and background.

2. Tell me how you started gambling and how your gambling has progressed.

1. Describe your gambling behaviour today along with the ups and downs you experience.

4. Describe some of the problems gambling has produced for you.

5. Have you ever thought of seeking help for your gambling through the various organizations available?

6. Do you feel that the services currently available are adequate?

7. Can you think of any additional programs and services that may help people with gambling problems?

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 216

APPENDIX V Case Studies Case Study #1

I’m going to be celebrating my 60th birthday next month and I’m having a big party because I never thought I’d be 60. I am a grandmother of 3 and a mother of 3. I’m from a reserve 120 miles north of Thunder Bay but I’ve lived in town most of my life. I went to a residential school for 6 years, finished high school and went to Teacher’s College. I have a B.A., a B.Ed. and a Masters degree in education. I was the first Native woman to get a B.A. in Northern Ontario. I’ve been involved in Native education for the last 35 years and have never been out of a job, so I’ve been lucky there. However, I got into gambling in 1992. I had a lot of personal problems, I always have. Seems like Native people always have personal problems involving family. So in 1992 I went to Winnipeg for a conference and I was pretty broke, hardly had any money. The last night I was there, my brother came up to meet me since he was living in Winnipeg for school. He took me out for supper and then asked if I wanted to come to the casino. I said, “Sure. I’ve never been to one. But I have no money.” He gave me $20 to play the machines and said to give him half of what I won. This was about 8:00 at night. My bus was leaving at 10:30. I’d never been to a casino so I didn’t know what to do. I wandered from machine to machine and found one machine that took loonies. So I got 20 loonies with my $20 and I started putting one in and pulling the handle. Right off the bat, I won 5 loonies. I put another one in, lost that, tried again. 20 loonies. I was pretty excited. I had a big pile of loonies so I started putting them in and started to lose them. I was down to 120 loonies when my brother came along and said, “What’s happening?” I said, “Look at all the loonies I’ve got. Let’s cancel my bus ticket to Thunder Bay. I’ll go tomorrow.” He said, “No, you’re not. Cash that in right now, give me half like you said, and you’re catching the bus.” So I cashed the $120, gave him $60 and took my half and went home on the bus. But I was hooked. Then the Grand Portage casino opened up and I started going there. I had the urge. I wanted to go. I like hearing the coins fall into the tray and I forget my problems when I’m there. I started taking whatever money I had to the casino. I wasn’t winning as much there, but I was there every night. I would spend $200 a night gambling. A girlfriend and I would drive down there late at night to play the machines until they closed the casino at 1:00 in the morning. There was always this progressive jackpot going up a dollar a second. It was a dollar machine. I’d put three coins in at once. It would progress to $700 or $800 and once it got up there, it went. So that was the progressive I was always trying to get. I kept going back, going back and I would lose and lose and lose until finally I was writing cheques. “Kiting”, it’s called. You write a cheque and then rush to the bank to put the money in there before the cheque arrives. Doing that was creating a lot of stress. Pretty soon I was borrowing for rent and lying about what I needed the money for and at the end of the month my whole paycheque went to paying back the bills. Finally I thought, “I’d better get out of this rut.” I applied for a job at McMaster. They were looking for someone to set up their Native Studies program. When I got the job, I thought that I was leaving everything behind. I had a fresh start away from the casino. They have a casino at Windsor. I went there only about three times the three years I was there. I didn’t really go to the casino. There aren’t as many. But I did go to bingo about once a week and the instant scratch tickets, I got hooked on those. I had a big sack full of them and each one was worth 50 cents. I’d win $100 and put it back in, win another $100, put it back in. I thought, “Gosh, I’m never going to get away from this gambling.” Again I borrowed money to pay off my bills. Finally, my three years were up at McMaster and I came home. But I almost died down there. There was so much stress I was handling from work, from family problems, from gambling and from

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 217 my debts that I had a major clot in the brain and ended up in the hospital in a coma. My kids were told that I wasn’t going to make it and they better come down. The blood clot in the brain had expanded and they were going to have to operate. In the middle of all that, I woke up. A week later I was out of the hospital, really weak, but better. The doctor examined me, gave me another CAT scan and said that the blood clot had disappeared and I’d made a miraculous recovery. So that was it. I got better and I went home. I came back to Thunder Bay and bought a house. It was a nice big house. I liked it. It had a basement, a nice big backyard, trees, everything I wanted. But I was worried I would get back into gambling and lose my house, my car, everything. So I looked around for a Gambler’s Anonymous group. I looked up an addiction research foundation and they said there was no G.A. group in town but there were a couple of people asking about it. They offered to get me in contact with these few people and let me set it up. Well, there was a gambling association in town that would set up gambling tables, playing cards and roulette. They said they would give us coffee and tea and a place at their office to meet. So we went there for the first month and I met those people interested in stopping gambling. We agreed it wasn’t right to meet in that place so we got a church to lend us their basement and we had a meeting. I went for 17 months without gambling and managed to keep up my mortgage payments and got a new car. But after 17 months I had the urge again to go gambling. This time I slowly slid into it. I asked a girlfriend to take me to Grand Portage so I could watch her gamble. I sat beside her and just watched her gamble. She’d win and we’d go home. The next time, I said, “I’ll give you some money to gamble, but you give me half of what you win this time.” So I let her pull all her handles and put the money in. She won $120 and give me $60, and I’d tell her to put the $60 back in. After doing that for 3 or 4 months, I thought to myself that I don’t need her to pull my handles. I can pull the handle myself. So I started gambling again. This time I was gambling $600 or $700 a month. Again, I thought, “I don’t want to lose my house. I don’t want to lose my car.” I had to quit writing cheques too because the bank stopped me. They said they knew what I was doing, that it was illegal and they wanted me to stop. Otherwise, they would have to take action against me. So I stopped that because I didn’t want a criminal record. But then I started pawning stuff off to support my gambling. Pretty soon, a lot of stuff was pawned off. At one point, I didn’t even care anymore. I didn’t even miss what was gone. You don’t see it, you don’t miss it. But after a while I quit pawning because I was too embarrassed to go back. After that I told myself I had to stop this. I had been gambling about a year when I heard that a gambling program had opened up at the Smith Clinic. I gave them a call and said I was very depressed over gambling. So a counsellor started seeing me regularly. Any time I needed her, she was there. We started a weekly session and she would teach me all the physical things that would happen when you gamble. It stimulates dopamine and endorphins that make you happy and take away the pain. That’s what gambling will do. But I also had problems like carpal tunnel, my fingertips were sore and my back was sore. There are even people who have heart attacks in casinos. I saw it happen once and it scared the hell out of me. I gambled because I had problems, but the more I gambled the more problems I got. My counsellor said that even if I didn’t quit gambling totally, I was always welcome to come and talk about it. The G.A. group was still going so I started going back to the meetings and everything was going fine. I’d still have urges though, these urges to gamble. Especially if I had problems at home, I’d have the urge to go gambling because once I’m there, I’ll forget everything. When that casino in town came in, I was there every night. I’d have $20 in my pocket and I’d feel the pull. One night I went in with that $20 and then went to the ATM machine and took out $200. I won the $450 jackpot and put it all back in. So I went back to the machine, took out all of my money and walked out with nothing. I must have spent $750 that day. I phoned my counsellor and told her that I was very depressed because I’d spent all my money. I told her I was ready to be banned from the Thunder Bay casino. She offered to come with me so the next day as soon as it opened I went down there and had my picture taken. They said OK, your picture has been taken and you won’t be allowed in again. If you get caught, you will be charged with trespassing. That was 4 years ago. So I’ve blocked it out. The casino in town doesn’t exist for me. My five years will be up next year and I’ll

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 218 probably do it again. I don’t go down there. I’ve met people who’ve lost their pensions and they are losing their houses. I’ve heard recently about this guy jumping off the roof of the mall because he was apparently $20,000 in the hole. He jumped to his death. Life’s not worth it to do that over gambling. It was when I started going to counselling that I understood what gambling was about. But then a couple of things disillusioned me. My counsellor retired and when I tried to call her replacement I would just get voice mail. I found that at the G.A. group, the gamblers were just bragging about how much they won or spent, and the man who runs the G.A. program still buys a 649 ticket once a week. He says nobody is going to take that away from him. Well, he’s still gambling. Nobody who gambles should run a G.A. program. So then on my own I quit gambling again for 11 months and 3 weeks. I didn’t gamble at all, not even bingo. That was in 2001, I think. But what happened was, every New Year’s my family gets together and we have a big dinner. We bring all of our kids and everything, and that year someone said that it wasn’t right that we should open our gifts unless the little kids have something too. So I said I would handle that and make a turkey. Well, that day I cooked a turkey, mashed potatoes, stuffing, the whole works, plus I wrapped 36 gifts. I ran through the whole house looking for things for the kids. By suppertime it was all ready but I was fed up with the whole family. So, when my girlfriend phoned me and asked if I wanted to go to bingo on the reserve, I said, “Yeah, sure.” She picked me up with all this stuff and we took it to my brother’s. I dropped everything, said goodbye and took off. They had to have the party without me. Now, I’m the oldest in the family and the matriarch, in a way. They really felt cheated that I didn’t show up there. But I was fed up with family and fed up with doing all the work. That’s what made me go back and gamble again. I started going back to the American casino but this time I said I was going to take control of it. They had regular bus service out there, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. You’d get on at 6:00, get there at 7:00, gamble until 11:00 and come back home for 12:00. Just four hours of gambling. When I drove down with my car, it could be 24 hours straight that I’m gambling. I’d go for periods of 24 hour gambling and I’d forget to eat. I’d go to the washroom but I wouldn’t eat. Just pop or coffee. But I’m a diabetic and one morning I had a diabetic attack and I just managed to make it to the border store to have breakfast at 6 o’clock in the morning. It would be many a night when I’d be driving home by myself at 4 o’clock in the morning, broke and crying and praying to the Lord to help me quit. So I started going on the bus because it’s controlled that way. Once a week I would go to bingo. Every Tuesday I’d have the urge. I’d teach until 4 o’clock and by quarter after 5 I’d hurry downtown, get on that bus and go to the border. I’d do one hour of slots and three hours of bingo, so it wasn’t too bad. But I was still spending $100 Canadian a night on bingo, so that’s $400 a month. I did that for a year and a half. During that time I would ask myself, “Why do you go to bingo? You’re trying to win that $40,000. You’re not going to win it. There’s no sense going down there, trying to win it. Just give it up and give up that casino. You don’t need to put money in that machine.” So I decided to give it up for the New Year. The last night I went was the 29th of December. My daughter and I went to bingo and that last night I ended up with $500 American in my pocket. But I said I’m not going back. I haven’t been back since and I haven’t had the urge to go. Instead, I‘ve been filling my time with religion and groups at church. At night when I go home now I do jigsaw puzzles. It takes the stress away. I read a lot, do crossword puzzles, listen to music. I find other things to fill the time. So that’s the story of my life and my gambling. Three years ago with my gambling problem I was $40,000 in the hole. My counsellor told me to go to family credit counselling and set up a program to get the creditors off my back. Rather than declare bankruptcy I went to them. I said, “I’m willing to pay my bills. Here’s my money.” So they helped me budget and I started paying. Recently, when I looked at the bill, I only owe $8000 and by then end of this year I should be paid off. Next year I won’t owe any money other than my mortgage and then I can start saving up to buy another car. As for services that are available, I don’t think there’s enough being done. Let me tell you, I don’t think there was adequate counselling available for me after my counsellor at the Smith Clinic retired. The G.A. group has fallen apart and they still need people to come there. I’ve heard that ONWA is doing something about gambling; they’ve put out a bunch of posters and they did a little

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 219 folder. My story is in there. Different Native groups are doing a little bit of something. There’s got to be warnings for young people too, because I saw a lot of young people coming to gamble. Still, someone that’s never gambled before, psychologists, that professor that did research on gambling; they don’t understand what gambling is about. Nobody can understand another gambler unless they are a gambler.

Case Study #2

I was born in 1954. I’m Métis. I lived the first part of my life in Gull Bay. I was raised in a lot of foster homes. When I was 18, I joined the army. Then, about 25 years ago, I got married. Things were pretty good and then all of a sudden I started to notice my wife started buying tickets; lottery tickets, Wintario, the scratch jobs that you can win instantly. All scratch tickets and pull tickets, 50 cent ones, dollar ones. It started out small. She’s been doing it ever since provincial tickets came out, I think. They had Wintario, provincial where you scratch off and whatever you got, you won it, plus there was a draw and they had cheques inside. That’s how it started. It was the corner stores. Go to any corner store and look and see all the different scratch tickets you can buy at $3 a pop. So she was going to the corner stores, trying to win that big jackpot. One time she said, “I hate being poor” and that really threw me because I thought we were doing well. I didn’t know what was going on. People had told me and I said to myself, “OK, well, I’ll check in to it.” So I’d come home and ask her, and she’d say, “Oh no, I haven’t been doing that.” But people had seen it, seen her buying the tickets. I didn’t want to believe it. Then I noticed bills weren’t getting paid, and I’d think, “Why are we behind?” She’d been hiding it for quite a while. I’d ask her, “Did you pay the bills?” She’d say, “Yeah.” So I said OK. I trusted her. I was in the hospital for 5 days a while back, in 1998, and in those 5 days she spent over $2000, all on tickets. I had a bank readout that said somebody went to the corner store nine times a day. Then one time I noticed $8000 missing and I said, “Where’d the money go?” Finally, one day I went to look for something and I pulled a drawer open and here was this purse that I’d never seen before. I thought, “What’s in here?” I opened it up and it was full of tickets. When I found out she was lying to me, I told her I’d leave her if she ever lied to me again. At that point we’d been married for 23 years and I didn’t want to throw 23 years of marriage away so I told her to get help. I’d ask her to stop constantly. When I had my house, she didn’t pay the mortgage. So I was $3000 behind on that, but I got it paid off. After that she started paying the mortgage all the time, but then it was the back taxes she didn’t pay. She just couldn’t pass up the tickets. I got a notice saying that I owed this money and all of a sudden once the City got involved it was $3000 that we owed. Then the City got a lawyer so now it’s $7000, plus interest on top of that. By the time they took the house, it was over $11,000 that I owed in taxes. I lost $30,000 in equity because I’d put $20,000 down on the house in cash plus the equity for the years that I’d paid. I only had 8 years to go and the house was mine There was also a $50,000 account that my dad had left. I was supposed to pay everything off and distribute it between my brother and me. Out of that account, about $20,000 disappeared. I was also upset because she got my two boys involved. What she did was, instead of her going to the store, she would send them with my bank card and tell them to get so much out. They were getting money from the account and they would give my wife so much and then they got payment for not telling me. That’s how she got the boys involved. All of a sudden there was no money left in this account and I’m trying to figure out where all the money went. My brother got a lawyer and, well, I could have ended up in jail. What ended up happening was my two sons signed over their half of the house. In my Dad’s will he had given them each one third, my two sons and my brother. They gave my brother the whole house because they were involved with taking the money. She finally said she would get help because I was really upset about it. When looking for help, we came to Ogden Health Centre right away because we just lived down the street and we were coming here all the time. We knew they had counsellors here. If this place wasn’t here, well, I heard about the Smith Clinic, but I don’t think my wife would go there because I don’t think she’s admitted it

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 220 to herself yet. I think she’s just doing it for me because I was mad. She sees a counsellor but I don’t know if she’s telling her the truth or not. I honestly don’t think so myself, but I could be wrong. I’m not sure. I want her to get help but I can’t really talk to her counsellor because it’s private stuff, so I don’t know what she’s saying. My wife needs to admit to herself that she has a problem, just like I’m an alcoholic and I’ve quit. It’s the same thing. But it seemed a lot easier for me. I think there are a lot of counsellors in town but I wish the government would stop advertising because I think that’s what sucks people in. Some people in Thunder Bay won that $12 million here; it wasn’t very long ago. So the media played that up and then somebody else won 649, $2 million or something like that. I know the owner of the variety store just up the street and he says that people will come in there trying to win that jackpot. I think they’re gearing their ads towards low-income people. That’s who they’re preying on. People who don’t have that much money so they have to take their last nickel and try to win big. So gambling should be like cigarettes – you can’t advertise it on TV. There should also be programs for the spouse and the kids that are suffering from the addiction so they know how to deal with it. I used to get really mad and yell a lot and the kids would clear out. So I was thinking of seeing a counsellor myself. It might help. We all need to learn how to deal with it and I need to understand why I’m so mad. She cost me a lot of money. If my wife went to the casino I could understand a lot of this, but it’s the corner stores! At home right now I have a briefcase full of $300 worth of tickets. Scratch tickets that she had hid. I think she still gambles on tickets but I haven’t caught her. But I don’t know for sure. I know she’ll still go up to the reserve to get smokes and if there is $3 or $4 left, she’s got to buy those tickets. So I keep asking her, did you pay the bills? You know, I’ve got to trust her. We’ve been married for over 25 years. But it’s caused arguments. I get kind of mad at her every once in a while because we are still behind on the bills. We are trying to catch up. We live on a disability pension of $1200 a month. She doesn’t realize that $1200 doesn’t go very far. Once we pay $550 for rent plus hydro, gas, cable and groceries, there’s not very much left. If you get behind, you’ll never catch up. Right now, we’re having problems paying the gas bill. It’s ridiculous. And hydro and gas are not nice. They want their money and that’s it; they don’t care. In cases like that the government should have something set up where they can’t cut you off. I know when it happened to us, hydro put on limiters. You couldn’t use the stove so we went and got an electric frying pan and used that. But the government should be helping out. They are the ones, I think, that put everybody in this problem. All this advertising they’ve got going on. You see it everywhere you go. People are weak and they’re looking for that fast dollar. Really, it’s easier to get hit by lightening, but then it happens here with that person with the $12 million. So that doesn’t help either. The money the government makes from these lotteries should be used to set up counselling and maybe even help to get people back above board where they’re on a level playing field again starting at zero. Let them get everything kind of caught up and then you can start from there. They should advertise about gambling equally as much as they advertise those $30 million jackpots. But talk is cheap. They should be actively helping people to quit.

Case Study #3

I’m from a small community north of Thunder Bay. I am a Métis person and under the laws of Canada I’m a Status Indian as well. I started gambling about seven or eight years ago. Gambling as in casino gambling. But when I was ten I used to call bingo at the church bingos. Once a week I sold hockey tickets for hockey pools for the church all over the community too. That was my first exposure to gambling. At the casino I was mainly slots. I never did any card games or things like that. About seven years ago I started on nickels and then I progressed to quarters and then dollars. I usually had my limit but sometimes I’d go over my limit in gambling. You have what you intend to spend and then you think, oh maybe I’ll win, but that doesn’t usually materialize. But whenever I won, then I’d think I was going to win again.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 221

For my budget, I was spending too much money, definitely. Of course, there was bingo too. I’ve cut down. I haven’t been going to many bingos but my casino was getting fairly regular. I was in bingos or casinos every day. Some days it would be bad. I would spend, per day, a couple hundred dollars. For me, that’s bad. And one day I spent about five hundred dollars. That was a really bad day. Actually, I think my partner is addicted to gambling. It’s a bad habit. Sometimes he’ll spend $800-1500 a night gambling but I would think, “Oh well, what the hell.” I think that’s where it kind of kicked in for me, thinking that way. I started thinking negatively. I would think, why should I think this way? There are better things to spend money on. It creates bills. You get behind on your regular bills and when you get trouble with your regular payments of bills then of course it goes to a collection agency. Your children feel it too. They feel and express that they’re being neglected because you are spending so much time in the casino versus time with them. I don’t gamble every day now. I’ve slowed down and I’ve tried to limit it. It’s almost getting like I’m kind of disgusted sometimes, especially in the Winnipeg casino because there were hardly anyone winning there. It was awful for payouts, especially with how big it is. If you don’t see any jackpots, that’s bad. At Thunder Bay, you go there, it’s a smaller casino. You can see winners. That kind of encourages people to go to this one rather than the other ones, for now anyway. But maybe that will die out too. Well, I didn’t go for help for my gambling. I just try to control it myself. I don’t think there are enough gambling services for help, not really. They need more private counselling where they don’t have to talk to other people. Some people are very ashamed of what they’ve done and that remorse is very deep inside them. They would probably want confidential counselling. Somewhere they could talk to someone that’s of their own background. I think it would be nice to have Aboriginal counsellors because it is not just the gambling. Sometimes these people are alcoholics who’ve quit drinking and now they’re gambling. They’ve replaced it with something else. So I think it would be nice if there were more people to talk to. I think the other issue is these childhood issues that are unresolved and they want to feel good and the winning helps them feel better for a little bit until they put all their money back into the machine. They think they are going to win again, but you don’t. I think I have to still work on getting out of there when I’m at my limit rather than taking more money out. Lately I was going every day. Before, I used to go on the weekend but I noticed certain people really hang in there. They can’t leave. They just want to stay there, take money out and just feed the machines. It’s kind of sad. I know people are going to bingo quite often too. I think they go for the social circles. They look at it as their recreation and they enjoy the company of people. They need to have more excursions. If there were more people organizing things like get-togethers or fishing outings, rather than being in a hall or building, that would be nice.

Case Study #4

I’m 57 now. When I was young I had been molested and abused and abandoned. My mother left me and my godparents, my aunt and uncle, brought me up. So I have a history a mile long. I’m very much a loner. My dad was a construction worker and we moved around a lot so I didn’t form any lasting friendships. It was always fleeting. So for me to say, “I’ve known that person all my life” is completely foreign. I was in my 30’s when I moved up here. I was married with two children. My husband was a drinker and he passed away. I had to go out and earn a living. I wasn’t going to go on welfare so I got a job at A & W and then a lady there said to come to the hospital, you can make better money. So I did that. I was very fortunate. I got in there and that supplied my daughters and myself a living. After my husband died, I had flings off and on for a good ten years and then I met my second husband who also turned out to be a drinker. Neither one of my husbands were bad men, they just liked drinking. That lasted about ten years and then I moved back to town. But I had started a little bit of gambling because at that time we lived closer to the border. I started gambling there and a little bit at the hospital with the Nevadas. I got hooked on that and the scratch tickets. This was way before

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 222 the casino here. This started at the hospital with the pull-tabs. Well, I should say the casino down there, the pull-tabs and the scratch. The whole nine yards That was fairly controlled until I moved into town and they opened up the casino here. I resisted for a while. I wasn’t going to go. I finally went a couple times and didn’t like it because it was smoky but then I was hooked. I got hooked on the slots, nothing with the cards. I would go in fits and starts but if I won a little bit I’d go back the following day to keep up the lucky streak. The funny thing is, I never won very much. I think in all the times that I’ve gone, I’ve won a couple of six hundred dollar jackpots. It’s not like you’re talking twenty-five thousand dollars like I saw one guy win on a five- dollar machine. It made my six hundred look pretty paltry but of course I was playing the nickel machines so I wasn’t spending as much. Still, you look up at the sign and think, “Ohh, cool. Wouldn’t that be nice to win?” It’s a mindset. Part of the reason I was gambling is because I’m a loner and I worked with people around me all the time. That would really zap my energy. And then being at home, raising my two daughters, it was very hard on me. So when I was going to the casino, you either had your choice of talking to your neighbours on both sides of you or not. You didn’t have to. You didn’t feel out of place. You felt just like an old shoe; very comfortable. You could wander from place to place. If you didn’t want to play, you didn’t have to play. That was very, very comforting to me and it relieved a lot of boredom because what else was I going to do for fun? I was off work with my knee, waiting for a knee replacement. I was a housekeeping aide so I couldn’t continue doing the work that I was doing because it was too heavy and a lot of bending and squatting. So I was off at that time. I don’t know if it’s even worse than drugs or alcohol. It’s a gradual thing. It’s subtle. If you go to a casino, there’s never a clock anywhere. You have no concept of time. Even wearing a watch, I’ve gone to the casino and said, “OK, its 11:20 right now” and the next thing you know, you look at your watch and it’s 3:00. It passes like it was ten minutes. The subtleties are there. You hear someone three chairs down from you and they’ve got the bells and whistles and the lights that are flashing. Of course, they want people to know that somebody’s winning. It doesn’t matter if they’re just cashing out the points they put in there. The funny thing is, sometimes I actually felt sexual. Weirdest thing. The music that they play when you win is geared to release endorphins. That’s probably part of the reason you become sexual because when you’re relaxed, it’s making you feel good. I’ve also noticed people getting very hostile because they’re not winning. It’s like they’re walking backwards the whole day. They’re not winning anything at all and they get very aggressive but it’s not enough to make them quit. I remember this one time that I was at the casino until six o’clock in the morning. This one lady beside me and I were having a hoot. I was winning enough to keep me going and then she won I don’t know how many pots. Now, on the other side, this young woman kept running to the ATM. She couldn’t win for love nor money but she was bound and determined to beat the machine and I said to the other woman, imagine her doing that. She’s not winning. Hasn’t it gotten through her head? It’s really ironic when you notice that about other people. You have to bite your own words because all of a sudden I’m playing this one time at the casino and I’m going back and getting more money. It’s like I’m split in two. There was a part of me saying, “What the hell are you doing?” and the other part is saying, “Shut up. We’re going to beat this” and just like a flash, I remembered that young woman and thought, I’m doing the same thing. But it wasn’t enough to stop me. I was pretty good at juggling things. I was robbing Peter to pay Paul. But I wasn’t making it, no. I was digging myself deeper without really being totally aware of how much I was digging myself in. It was like I was caught in an eddy. I was off with my knee that was keeping me from doing a lot of the things that I wanted to do but no, it was pure, unadulterated laziness and boredom; Boredom more than anything. My co-workers and my girlfriends that I hung around with were working. The people who lived around me were away at work, so what else was I going to do? It was a lot easier to go there than to go to the 55 club because, I mean, it was 55. I can’t reverse the clock, and it is the 55 club, but hell no. This was more fun. What fun was I going to have with those old fogies? In the meantime, I put a bid in on another house expecting to go back to work but as things ended up, it just became too much. Between my gambling, not being able to go back to work and

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 223 over exceeding my finances, I ended up having to go bankrupt. So I ended up with one house but I let the other one go. To tell you the honest truth, that was the best thing that ever happened to be because it was a real wake-up, believe me. My two girls were beginning to worry about me. I don’t know if it was the issue of money too much, because they knew I had worked hard for my money and I was always good with my money so they didn’t really realize the depth of it. When I had to declare bankruptcy, that’s when they realized. I fell down a notch off the totem pole, so to speak. After my first husband died I had worked so hard for my credit. I had no credit rating because everything was in his name so I worked hard for my credit rating. I had the best credit rating going. That went down the tubes. Through that, I knew that I was in trouble and I was headed for worse so that’s when I went to the Smith Clinic and I met a counsellor for my gambling. Through her, I met another counsellor but she was for the other part of my problem. I have expunged myself from the casino. It took me a while because, of course, I had to go back and prove to myself that I didn’t really have a problem. The first time was fine but the second time I looked down at my bank account and I had blown eight hundred dollars in a couple days. So therefore, I have excluded myself from the casino here. I’m still into scratch tickets so I’m not 100% cut off. I still do the scratch tickets so I’ve got a bit of the gambler in me and I know that it wouldn’t take much for me to start going back again. As a matter of fact, I’ve got three scratch tickets in my purse. Every once in a while I go a little nuts with that and I figure, well, it’s not as expensive as if I was going to the casino. See? Justification again. I’m on a very fixed income. So that’s a thing I need to work on, why I’m still doing that. I still have the delusion of maybe winning the fifty thousand dollars. It’s a mind game. Those I do fairly often. Not everyday, but if I have a winner, I keep rolling. I can spend nine, twelve dollars a day. I’ve spend up to twenty-four but not too often because I’ve controlled myself a little bit. I’ve gone down to the States once and I laugh because the last time my counsellor and I had a session, I said, “I’m going back down again.” But to me, it’s a forty-five minute drive down and a forty-five minute drive back, so it’s inconvenient. This casino here, it doesn’t even bother me that I can’t go. That’s really foreign to me because the way that I was feeling before, I wanted to go. Now that I’ve expunged myself, I do sewing for dogs. I get people to donate old jeans, towels, shirts, whatever. I cut them up and I make doggy beds for the shelter. Instead of spending my money going to the border, the church is always looking for the cupboard so if I see some good sales on at Safeway, I take my money and blow it there. I go and play cribbage at the 55 Plus club. They are a real riot. Some of them are absolutely wonderful. So I’m intermingling at my choice and at my will. Emotionally, I feel like a million bucks. With my counsellor, I am working on a lot of my abandonment issues and my other personal problems that I had stuffed for many years while working and raising kids. I never had the time to work on them and it wasn’t the right time. You know how they say that timing is everything? For me, this was the best thing that ever happened to me. You won’t get too many people telling you that but to me, it was. I talk with my counsellor about the gambling issue and I journal. I started journaling every day but now I kind of go in spurts. I need to get into the habit of writing every day again, even if I only write a little bit, because it’s developed a lot of my patterns and what sets me off. It’s like a drug. We all need our fix in one way or another, whether it’s sexual, drugs, booze, smoking. What I’m learning right now is to have a balance in my life and to catch what my booby-traps are; my set-ups. We all set ourselves up in one way, shape or form. I think they need to show treatments more, especially since the casino. At the place I go for my bankruptcy, one of the ladies said that it is absolutely horrendous the amount of people that declare bankruptcy, especially in the older people. They lose their shirts. So I don’t think the information’s out there. I think as part of a person’s bankruptcy process there should be a booklet on gambling. People need to own up to their own screw-ups. They need to make this information available there so it catches somebody’s eye. The only reason I knew about the Smith Clinic is that both of my husbands were drinkers. I’d gone through the family program for Al-Anon. That’s how I got on to the Smith Clinic. I knew they had a gambling program and if they didn’t, they would lead me somewhere. So it’s really ironic how God places things in your path.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community 224

To me, what are most important are children. I think things should be done in the schools. I have a girlfriend who’s into the gambling and she has her four-year-old doing pull-tabs. So to me, I think your best bet is to have something aimed at the children. It’s just like proper sex education. Get it at the Native grassroots. They go in and talk to them about boozing and drugs; well, this is a drug too. It’s a replacement. It deadens feelings. It hides the issue just like drugs or alcohol. At the same time, go into the nursing homes. They had a thing at the 55 Plus but nobody came because there’s an awful lot of shame. Right about now, I don’t feel the urge. I seriously think even if you gave me two hundred dollars and said go down to the casino and play, I honestly don’t think I would. I’m not saying I wouldn’t go buy some scratch tickets but I would think of where I could place it first to help somebody else. So my mindset has changed a lot. I just came from a session with my counsellor and we were talking about how my attitude has evolved. She suggests that I see where I am now as opposed to when I first started counselling in October. So for me, I can almost say I’m a success. Just being about to try and think before I do this, I’ve come a long way. Before, I just totally went on emotion. That was my trigger point, emotion. With the gambling, it camouflaged a lot of those issues from molestation when I was young and abandonment issues. Those things had been stomped so deep that the gambling just kind of numbed everything and I had my feelings vicariously through that. When that quit and I started with my gambling sessions, my counsellor introduced me to another counsellor for more of the personal issues to help unblock those. So that was my crux there. That was my circle. That’s why I say that gambling bankruptcy was the best thing that ever happened to me. It’s brought me in with such nice people now. I’m not saying I’m ever going to have any long-term relationships but they’re people that I can associate with and interact with and it’s fun. So I’m having fun in a different way. If I ever meet somebody again, that’s in God’s hands. I’m definitely not looking for it. I need to straighten myself out first. The thing is, we need to give people tools to help themselves because one of the things I have found in Al-Anon, why I quit going a long time ago is, I would go steadily and then I would be away from it for a while and when I would go back it would be the same people, sitting at the same table, saying the same things. To me, you need a helping hand but don’t make it a life situation. Don’t enable them to stay that way. How many people have gone into the Smith Clinic two and three times? I think once is good, two, OK but the third time, foul ball because there’s something that’s too easy. They’ve given you the tools, now use them. You wouldn’t want to see me back here again next year, telling you the same story or adding a little bit more to it because when you have the same things all the time, familiarity breeds contempt after a while. People become contemptuous because now we’ve got the alcoholics, we’ve got the drug addicts and here comes the gambling. So that should be the optimum; help people to help themselves. Otherwise it becomes a vicious circle and people become frustrated. They quit going because there’s some little key that’s missing.

Examining Gambling and Problem Gambling in the Thunder Bay Aboriginal Community