DOCSLIB.ORG

Plantar Plate Repair Via a Direct Plantar Approach: an Outcomes Analysis Mark A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plantar Plate Repair Via a Direct Plantar Approach: an Outcomes Analysis Mark A Plantar Plate Repair via a Direct Plantar Approach: An Outcomes Analysis Mark A. Prissel, DPM, AACFAS; Christopher F. Hyer, DPM, MS, FACFAS; Jacqueline K. Donovan, DPM; Amanda L. Quisno, DPM Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center | Columbus, OH | 614-895-8747 | www.orthofootankle.com INTRODUCTION: RESULTS: Plantar plate injury is an underdiagnosed and A Ultimately, 131 patients (144 toes) were included and the Table 1: Unique Patients Table 3: Pre- Post- Demographic Characteristics (n=131) Foot Function Index (FFI) Operative Operative p-value difficult to treat pathology (1-21). Surgical response rate for mailed surveys was 52.8% (76 of 144 nd Female, n (%) 107 (81.7) Scores (n=74) (n=74) management of the dorsally subluxed 2 toes). Clinical outcomes reported a well-aligned toe in Age, mean (SD) 58.6 (10.2) FFI total score, mean (SD) 42.0 (22.6) 21.3 (20.2) <0.001 metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is challenging, 87.1% of cases, with a recurrence rate of 7.6% (11 of 144) Body mass index, mean (SD) 28.8 (5.2) FFI subscales, mean (SD) with sometimes unpredictable long-term result Side(s), n (%) Pain 51.8 (23.7) 26.4 (25.8) <0.001 and a revision rate of 2.8% (4 of 144). Statistically Right 70 (53.4) Disability 45.0 (27.2) 22.7 (22.8) <0.001 (1,3,4,10,12-21). Direct plantar plate repair significant improvement in overall modified FFI (p<0.001) Left 58 (44.3) Activity limitation 15.5 (18.3) 8.5 (15.1) 0.001 techniques via a plantar approach have been Both 3 (2.3) and subscales scores for pain (p<0.001), disability Number of affected toe(s), n (%) Table 4: Affected Toes described in expert opinion or technique guides, Plantar Plate Repair Satisfaction (n=76) Figure 2: MRI image of a planar plate tear. (p<0.001), and activity limitation (p=0. 001) were noted One 118 (90.1) with few reports of outcomes or clinical result Two 13 (9.9) Current pain level of affected toe, 2.0 (0.0 – 10.0) post-operatively when compared to pre-operative data. The median (range) Clinical Characteristics Affected Toes (n=144) (3,18-21). More recently, in addition to direct Affected toe touches the ground B median post-operative VAS pain level reported at the time Affected toe, n (%) plantar plate repair techniques via plantar nd when standing, n (%) of survey completion was 2.0 (range 0.0 – 10.0; mean 2.3; 2 128 (88.9) DISCUSSION: approach, dorsal techniques have been developed 3rd 16 (11.1) Yes 55 (72.4) SD 2.6). Regarding the subjective patient survey, patients No 21 (27.6) Despite the modified FFI scores, patient secondary to concerns regarding potential painful Pre-operative diagnosis reported 72.4% of affected toes to “touch the ground when Plantar plate tear 55 (38.2) Scar on the bottom of the foot satisfaction questionnaire data reported plantar scars and wound healing complications standing.” There was no difference in patient satisfaction MTP instability 39 (27.1) causes pain, n (%) mixed results. Our modified FFI results Crossover toe 28 (19.4) Yes 24 (31.6) (1,10,12-15). The purpose of this retrospective with the outcome of the procedure for toes that touched the No 52 (68.4) demonstrate this approach provides Figure 1: (A) Anteroposterior MTP dislocation 13 (9.0) review was to determine the outcomes of a Experienced wound healing excellent post-operative pain relief, radiograph of a 2nd plantar plate ground compared to toes that did not touch the ground Hammertoe deformity 7 (4.9) nd rd complication(s) with the incision, improvement of associated disability, and previously described plantar plate repair technique tear, (B) Lateral radiograph of a (χ2(1): 1.73; p=0.188). Patients were more likely to report 2 /3 MTP instability 2 (1.4) Concomitant Weil osteotomy 82 (56.9) n (%) improvement of activity limitations. The (3). chronic dislocated 2nd toe. being dissatisfied with the outcome of the procedure for Yes 7 (9.2) performed, n (%) importance of managing patient toes in which the scar on the bottom of the foot caused No 69 (90.8) METHODS: Table 2: Affected Toes Knowing what the patient knows expectations is acknowledged secondary to pain compared to toes in which the scar on the bottom of Clinical Outcomes (n=144) A retrospective analysis of patients 18 years of age and older who underwent direct 2nd or now about the procedure and the discrepancy with patient satisfaction Days to final clinical follow-up, median (range) 196.5 (29.0 – 793.0) rd the foot caused no pain (76.2% and 26.0%, respectively) recovery, the patient would have 3 plantar plate repair via plantar approach with or without concomitant Weil osteotomy at Toe position on final clinic note, n (%) data and the modified FFI results. Further (χ2(1): 15.42; p<0.001). Returned patient surveys indicated this repair again, n (%) a single foot and ankle specialty practice from December 2010 through April 2014 Good/excellent/well-aligned 121 (87.1)* Yes 42 (55.3) prospective study is warranted comparing identified via chart review, as well as, a prospective patient reported subjective outcomes self-perceived wound healing complications in 7 toes Elevated MTPJ / dorsiflexed toe 9 (6.5)* No 33 (43.4) this technique to alternate dorsal (9.2%, 7 of 76), interestingly contrary to the clinical Transverse malalignment 4 (2.9)* No response 1 (1.3) analysis was performed. Patients who underwent revision plantar plate repair, indirect Plantarflexed toe / Overcorrection 4 (2.9)* Satisfied with the outcome of the approaches for plantar plate repair with and (e.g. dorsal approach) plantar plate repair, underwent other surgical repair of the 2nd documentation review reporting 6 toes (4.2%, 6 of 144) Rigid 1 (0.7)* procedure, n (%) without associated commercially available Complications, n (%) MTPJ (e.g. Girdlestone-Taylor procedure), experienced acute surgical repair of plantar with wound healing complications. For 55.3% (42 of 75) of Extremely satisfied 21 (27.6) suture passing systems. affected toes, the patient reported that knowing what they Wound problems 6 (4.2) Somewhat satisfied 21 (27.6) plate injury, patients younger than 18 years of age at the time of surgery, or patients Recurrence 11 (7.6) Neutral 5 (6.6) without adequate available medical record documentation were excluded. know now about the procedure and recovery, he/she would Revision 4 (2.8) Somewhat dissatisfied 21 (27.6) have this repair again in the future if needed. Extremely dissatisfied 8 (10.5) REFERENCES: 1. Watson TS, Reid DY, Frerichs TL. Dorsal approach for plantar plate repair with Weil osteotomy: operative technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 May;35(7):730-739. 12. Sullivan M, Panti JP. The use of McGlamry elevator to assist suture passing in the dorsal technique of plantar plate repair with Weil osteotomy for lesser metatarsal joint instability. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(3):209-11. 2. Sung W, Weil L Jr, Weil LS Sr, et al. Diagnosis of plantar plate injury by magnetic resonance imaging with reference to intraoperative findings. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(5): 570-574. 13. Doty JF, Coughlin MJ. Metatarsophalangeal joint instability of the lesser toes. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:440-5. 3. McAlister JE, Hyer CF. The direct plantar plate repair technique. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Dec;6(6):446-51. 14. Sung J. Technique using interference fixation repair for plantar plate ligament disruption of lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:508-12. 4. Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, et al. Prospective evaluation of protocol for surgical treatment of lesser MTP joint plantar plate tears. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Sep;35(9):876-85. 15. Sanhudo JAV, Gomes JLE. Pull-out technique for plantar plate repair of the metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Clin N Am. 2012;17:417-24. 5. Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, et al. MRI evaluation of the MTP plantar plates compared with arthroscopic findings: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Mar;34(3): 315-22. 16. Chalayon, O, Chertman C, Guss AD, Saltzman CL, Nickisch F, Bachus, KN. Role of plantar plate and surgical reconstruction techniques on static stability of lesser metatarsophalangeal joints: a biomechanical study. 6. Klein EE, Weil L Jr, Weil LS Sr, et al. Clinical examination of plantar plate abnormality: a diagnostic perspective. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jun;34(6):800-4. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(10):1436-42. 7. Klein EE, Weil L Jr, Weil LS Sr, et al. The underlying osseous deformity in plantar plate tears: a radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Apr;6(2):108-18. 17. Ford LA, Collins KB, Christensen JC. Stabilization of the subluxed second metatarsophalangeal joint: flexor tendon transfer versus primary repair of the plantar plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998;37(3):217-22. 8. Barouk LS. Weil's metatarsal osteotomy in the treatment of metatarsalgia. Orthopade.1996; 25:338–44. 18. Camasta CA. Plantar plate repair of the second metatarsophalangeal joint. McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery Fourth Edition, Volume 1. 2013:pp 187-201. 9. Taylor RG. The treatment of claw toes by multiple transfers of flexor into extensor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951; 33:539–42. 19. Blitz NM, Ford LA, Christensen JC. Plantar plate repair of the second metatarsophalangeal joint: technique and tips. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43(4):266-70. 10. Weil L Jr, Sung W, Weil LS Sr, Malinoski K. Anatomic plantar plate repair using the Weil metatarsal osteotomy approach.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pathomechanics of Plantar Fasciitis
    Sports Med 2006; 36 (7): 585-611 REVIEW ARTICLE 0112-1642/06/0007-0585/$39.95/0 2006 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. The Pathomechanics of Plantar Fasciitis Scott C. Wearing,1 James E. Smeathers,1 Stephen R. Urry,1 Ewald M. Hennig2 and Andrew P. Hills1 1 Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia 2 Biomechanik Labor, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany Contents Abstract ....................................................................................585 1. Anatomy of the Plantar Fascia ............................................................586 1.1 Gross Anatomy of the Plantar Fascia...................................................586 1.2 Histological Anatomy of the Plantar Fascia .............................................589 1.2.1 Neuroanatomy ................................................................590 1.2.2 Microcirculation ...............................................................590 1.2.3 The Enthesis ...................................................................590 2. Mechanical Properties of the Plantar Fascia ................................................592 2.1 Structural Properties ..................................................................593 2.2 Material Properties ...................................................................593 3. Mechanical Function of the Plantar Fascia .................................................594 3.1 Quasistatic Models of Plantar Fascial Function ..........................................594
    [Show full text]
  • Plantar Plate Pathology: a Review Article
    MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology Plantar Plate Pathology: A Review Article Abstract Review Article The plantar plate is a thick fibrocartilage tissue located at the ball of the foot. Volume 6 Issue 6 - 2016 Pathology of the plantar plate is frequently missed or misdiagnosed and additionally, can be challenging to treat. Current surgical techniques include direct and indirect repairs. The purpose of this article is to help better understand and review the evaluation and treatment of plantar plate tears. Texas Sports Medicine Institute, USA Keywords: Plantar plate; lesser metatarsophalangeal joint; Weil metatarsal osteotomy; Lachman drawer; Kelikian pushup test *Corresponding author: Michael Maier, Texas Sports Medicine Institute, 7830 W, Grand Parkway S, Suite 280 Richmond, TX 77406, USA, Tel: 281-633-4940; Email: Introduction Received: October 05, 2016 | Published: December 14, 2016 and rupture are common sources of forefoot pain and deformity. FirstPlantar discussed plate in pathology the 1980s, including numerous inflammation, terms are used attenuation, to describe this condition including metatarsalgia, pre-dislocation syndrome, When the plantar plate ruptures and dorsal displacement of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) instability, and crossover proximal phalanx occurs, the ability of the intrinsic and extrinsic toe deformity [1]. It is important to recognize that these diagnoses musculature to provide dynamic stability of the lesser MTPJs are common manifestations of plantar plate dysfunction. is impaired. Changes of the biomechanical axes of the primary The second MTPJ is the most frequently affected with the incidence of this condition highest among women over the age longusflexors resultof the inlesser a defective MTPJs restraint(the interosseous to prevent muscles) dorsal subluxation in addition of 50 [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joint Instability: Current Concepts in Plantar Plate Reconstruction
    CHAPTER 25 Update on Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joint Instability: Current Concepts in Plantar Plate Reconstruction James H. Chung, DPM INTRODUCTION A hammertoe or crossover toe can indicate a disruption of the plantar plate, although plantar plate tears can occur The term “predislocation syndrome” was first coined in without an obvious deformity (7). The affected toe typically 1995 by Yu and Judge as “an acute, subacute or chronic and exhibits dorsal migration of the proximal phalanx with a exquisitely painful inflammatory condition of the plantar plate medial drift in the transverse plane related to instability of of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints, which if left untreated the intrinsic musculature at the joint (2). In chronic cases, or mistreated, will result in eventual metatarsophalangeal there is subsequent subluxation and dislocation of the joint. joint luxation” (1). Plantar plate insuffciency is now a well Klein et al found the presence of a crossover toe to have a established pathology that is known to contribute to lesser 88.9% specificity for plantar plate tears (7). metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) instability, most commonly Many clinical tests have been utilized to aid the affecting the second MPJ (2). diagnosis of a plantar plate tear. The vertical stress test, Stability of the lesser MPJ is comprised of static and described by Thompson and Hamilton, evaluates MPJ dynamic anatomic restraints. Static stability of the MPJ stability and is positive if there is greater than 2 mm dorsal is provided by the plantar plate and collateral ligaments, displacement or 50% joint subluxation (8). Klein et al found while dynamic stability of the MPJ is maintained by the a positive vertical stress test to be the most specific (99.8%) extrinsic and intrinsic musculature (2,3).
    [Show full text]
  • Plantar Plate Repair, Coding Sequela, and Other Topics
    CODINGLINE PARTICULARS Plantar Plate Repair, Coding Sequela, and Other Topics Here are the answers to some commonly-asked questions. BY HARRY GOLDSMITH, DPM Welcome to Codingline Partic- a 7th character (A, D, S) Disorder of ligament, left foot— ulars, a regular feature in Podiatry Sprain of metatarsophalangeal M24.275 49 Management focusing on foot and joint of left lesser toe: S93.525 plus a ankle coding, billing, and practice 7th character (A, D, S) With the “M” ICD-10 codes, if management issues. there are symptoms present with the These code choices presume in- deformity(ies) add the appropriate Plantar Plate Repair jury, such as laceration or traumatic symptom ICD-10 code. For example: tear of cartilage, joint, or ligament of Pain in right foot—M79.671 “What would be the best diag- metatarsophalangeal joint. Pain in left foot—M79.672 nosis code to use for a plantar plate tear? And what would be the CPT code for a primary repair of a plantar plate tear?” There is no specific CPT or ICD-10 code for a plantar plate tear. There is no specific CPT or ICD- 10 code for a plantar plate tear. If the procedure you perform was designed to repair the position and instability If the etiology is a spontaneous Pain in right toe(s)—M79.674 of the toe with repair of the metatar- rupture of the plantar plate, consider Pain in left toe(s)—M79.675 sal-phalangeal joint capsule/ligament using: (one would presume that is why you Other articular cartilage disor- Sequela are there), then CPT 28313 (recon- ders, right foot M24.174 Actually, coding “sequela” in struction, angular deformity of toe, Other articular cartilage disor- ICD-10 is not all that difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthosports Orthopaedic Update 2012
    2012 LATEST ORTHOPAEDIC UPDATES 47-49 Burwood Rd Lvl 3, 29-31 Dora Street Lvl 3, 1a Barber Ave 160 Belmore Rd CONCORD NSW 2137 HURSTVILLE NSW 2220 KINGSWOOD NSW 2747 RANDWICK NSW 2031 Tel: 02 9744 2666 Tel: 02 9580 6066 Tel: 02 4721 1865 Tel: 02 9399 5333 Fax: 02 9744 3706 Fax: 02 9580 0890 Fax: 02 4721 2832 Fax: 02 9398 8673 www.orthosports.com.au Doctors Consulting here Dr Mel Cusi Dr David Dilley 47-49 Burwood Road Tel 02 9744 2666 Dr Todd Gothelf Concord CONCORD NSW 2137 Fax 02 9744 3706 Dr George Konidaris Dr John Negrine Dr Rodney Pattinson Dr Doron Sher Dr Kwan Yeoh Doctors Consulting here Dr Paul Annett Dr Mel Cusi Dr Jerome Goldberg Suite F-Level 3 Tel 02 9580 6066 Dr Todd Gothelf Hurstville Medica Centre Fax 02 9580 0890 Dr George Konidaris 29-31 Dora Street Dr Andreas Loefler HURSTVILLE NSW 2220 Dr John Negrine Dr Rodney Pattinson Dr Ivan Popoff Dr Allen Turnbull Dr Kwan Yeoh Level 3 Doctors Consulting here Tel 4721 1865 Penrith 1a Barber Avenue Dr Todd Gothelf Fax 4721 2832 KINGSWOOD NSW 2747 Dr Kwan Yeoh Doctors Consulting here Dr John Best Dr Mel Cusi Dr Jerome Goldberg 160 Belmore Road Tel 02 9399 5333 Dr Todd Gothelf Randwick RANDWICK NSW 2031 Fax 02 9398 8673 Dr Andreas Loefler Dr John Negrine Dr Rodney Pattinson Dr Ivan Popoff Dr Doron Sher Dr Kwan Yeoh www.orthosports.com.au Thank you for attending our Latest Orthopaedic Updates Lecture. All of the presentations and handouts are available for viewing on the Teaching Section of our website: www.orthosports.com.au We would love your feedback – Tell us what you liked about the day and what you think we could improve for next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Etiology and Biomechanics of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Sprains (Turf Toe) in Athletes
    Critical ReviewsTM in Biomedical Engineering, 40(1):43-61 (2012) Etiology and Biomechanics of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Sprains (turf toe) in Athletes Rebecca E. Frimenkoa, W. Brent Lieversa, Michael J. Coughlinb, Robert B. Andersonc, Jeff R. Crandalla, Richard W. Kenta* aCenter for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia; bCoughlin Clinic at Saint Alphonsus, Boise, ID; cFoot and Ankle Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, North Carolina * Address all correspondence to: Richard W. Kent, Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, 4040 Lewis & Clark Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22911 ABSTRACT: Sprains of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, referred to colloquially as “turf toe,” are a de- bilitating sports injury because the hallux is pivotal to an athletes’ ability to accelerate and cut. Severe sprains may require weeks to full recovery, and injuries requiring surgery may prevent an athlete from full athletic participation for months. Whereas the diagnosis and treatment of turf toe are well documented in the literature, less is known about the biomechanics of this joint and the mechanical properties of the structures that compose it. Nevertheless, this information is vital to those, such as equipment designers, who attempt to develop athletic footwear and surfaces intended to reduce the likelihood of injury. To that end, this review summarizes the literature on the anatomy of the first MTP joint, on biomechanical studies of the first MTP joint, and on the incidence, mechanisms, and treatment of turf toe. Furthermore, gaps in the literature are identified and opportunities for future research are discussed. Only through a thorough synthesis of the anatomic, biomechanical, and clinical knowledge regarding first MTP joint sprains can appropriate countermeasures be designed to reduce the prevalence and severity of these injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Plantar Plate Repair
    Coding for Plantar Plate Repair Jeffrey D. Lehrman, DPM, FASPS, MAPWCA, CPC Advisor, APMA Coding Committee Expert Panelist, Codingline Advisor, APMA MACRA Task Force Fellow, American Academy of Podiatric Practice Management Board of Directors, American Society of Podiatric Surgeons Board of Directors, American Professional Wound Care Association Editorial Advisory Board, WOUNDS Twitter: @DrLehrman Disclaimer CPT codes and their descriptions and the policies discussed in this webinar do not reflect or guarantee coverage or payment. Just because a CPT code exists, payment for the service it describes is not guaranteed. Coverage and payment policies of governmental and private payers vary from time to time and for different areas of the country. Questions regarding coverage and payment by a payer should be directed to that payer. The coding advice provided in this webinar reflects only the opinions of the speaker. APMA and Jeffrey Lehrman and Lehrman Consulting, LLC do not claim responsibility for any consequences or liability attributable to the use of the information contained in this presentation Reference Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) is copyright 1966, 1970, 1973, 1977, 1981, 1983-2018 by the American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association (AMA). Reference 2019 cpt Professional Anatomy of the Plantar Plate Illustration: Australasian Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine, December 3, 2013 3 Anatomy of the Plantar Plate Illustration: Australasian Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine, December 3, 2013 4 Plantar Plate Anatomy • Primarily type I collagen • Metatarsal Head Proximal phalanx • Insertional fibers from the lumbricals and interosseous tendons • Distal attachments of the plantar fascia.
    [Show full text]
  • Turf Toe Operative and Nonoperative Protocol
    Phone: 574.247.9441 ● Fax: 574.247.9442 ● www.sbortho.com TURF TOE OPERATIVE AND NONOPERATIVE PROTOCOL Turf toe is a sprain of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP). The mechanism of injury is typically a forceful hyperextension of this joint. There is a 50% risk of injury at 78 degrees of hallux dorsiflexion. While this injury can happen during any sport or activity, it is particularly common in NFL players. It has been estimated that up to 45% of professional NFL players will experience at least one MTP sprain during their careers. This is because the artificial turf surfaces that many teams use are harder and do not have as much give as a grass field does. Anatomy There are several structures that are important for stabilizing the first MTP joint. Sesamoid/Plantar complex: - Plantar plate - Collateral ligaments - Flexor hallucis brevis - Abductor and adductor hallicus tendons The plantar plate is a thick and fibrous tissue that primary prevents excessive dorsiflexion. The collateral ligaments restrict excessive medial or lateral motion. Sesamoids lie within the flexor hallucis brevis tendon and provide additional stability to the MTP by acting as weight bearing structures. Exam and Grading - Grade 1: Sprain of the plantar complex. Patient will have mild effusion and pin-point tenderness to the area. - Grade 2: Partial tear of the plantar complex. On exam, there will be pain and difficulty moving the first toe. The patient will be tender, with moderate effusion, and possible ecchymosis. - Grade 3: Complete tear of the plantar complex. On exam, there will be pain and difficulty moving the first toe.
    [Show full text]
  • HAT-TRICK MTP Bilateral Joint Repair System
    Surgical Technique Foot and Ankle Technique Guide Metatarsophalangeal (MTP) Bilateral Joint Repair Prepared in consultation with: Phinit Phisitkul, MD Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation University of Iowa Iowa City, IA HAT-TRICK™ Lesser Toe Repair System MTP Bilateral Joint Repair Surgical Technique The following technique guide contains a summary of medical techniques and opinions based upon the training and expertise of the surgeon advisory team, along with its knowledge of the Smith & Nephew HAT-TRICK Lesser Toe Repair System. Smith & Nephew does not provide medical advice and recommends that surgeons exercise their own professional judgment when determining a patient’s course of treatment. This guide is presented for educational purposes only. HAT-TRICK Orthopaedic HAT-TRICK Podiatric Advisory Team Advisory Team Ned Amendola, MD Emily Cook, DPM Florian Nickisch, MD Jeremy Cook, DPM Phinit Phisitkul, MD David Edwards, DPM Charles Saltzman, MD Mickey Stapp, DPM Table of contents Introduction ......................................................................................................3 Position the patient .........................................................................................4 MTP Bilateral Joint Repair Technique .............................................................4 Expose the joint and prepare for the repair .......................................................4 Place the sutures in the plantar plate and collateral ligaments .........................6 Drill the bone tunnel using the Phalangeal
    [Show full text]
  • A Suture-Button Technique for Stabilization of the Plantar Plate and Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joint
    The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery 57 (2018) 645–653 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery journal homepage: www.jfas.org Original Research A Suture-Button Technique for Stabilization of the Plantar Plate and Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joint Molly S. Judge, DPM, FACFAS 1, Gina Hild, DPM, AACFAS 2 1Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Mercy Foot & Ankle Residency Program, Cleveland, OH 2Postgraduate Year 3, Department of Surgery, Mercy Foot & Ankle Residency Program, Cleveland, OH ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Level of Clinical Evidence: 4 We retrospectively evaluated the use of a suture-button technique to stabilize the plantar plate and lesser metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) to alleviate pain and dysfunction due to failed digital surgery with lesser Keywords: MTPJ dysfunction. Eight consecutive patients (8 feet, 13 rays) were studied, including 2 males (25%) and instability joint subluxation 6 females (75%). Their median age was 56.5 (range 25 to 72) years, and the median follow-up duration ligament was 28 (range 21 to 36) months. Of the 8 patients, 7 (87.5%) underwent concomitant adjunct proce- metatarsal dures. A 10-increment (equal intervals) pain score and the Bristol foot score (BFS) were used to assess predislocation syndrome subjective satisfaction and foot-related quality of life before and after surgery. The median preoperative toe pain score was 8 (range 5 to 10). Postoperatively, the median pain score was 0 (range 0), and the differ- ence was statistically significant (p = .0106). The median preoperative and postoperative BFS was 53 (range 32 to 70) and 20 (range 18 to 34), respectively. The difference was also statistically significant (p = .018).
    [Show full text]
  • Plantar Plate Dysfunction Proximal Phalan-X Base
    CHAPTER 4 PIANTAR PIATE, D\SFUNCTION Justin Fleru,ing, DPM Craig Camasta, DPM INTRODUCTION In 7995, Yu and Judge introduced the phrase predislocation syndrome (PDS) to describe the early The surgical management of second metatarsopha- prodromal phase of plantar plate dysfr:nction.' langeal (MTP) joint instability remains a dilemma to Subjectively, patients with PDS may describe a dull the fbot and ankle slrrgeon despite nurrerous aching or throbbing pain, or perceive the sensation articles and research devoted to detailing the of fullness benezrth the MTP joint and digit. As Yu anatomy and surgical correction of this pathoiogy. notes, the magnitucle of pain and the physical exam- Althor-rgh several authors believe that the plantar ination findings are significantly disproportionate. plate is the primary static stabilizing structnre of t1-re Typically, there is no history of prior injr,rry or' lesser digit, few have aclvocated its direct repair.' trauma and patients may describe a highly active The development of chronic subluxation and lifestyle. inclucling u,.alking, running, or aerobics. dislocation at the lesser MTP joint 1eve1 has been Early clinical presentation may include significant attributed to several conclitions including hallux pain and litt1e, if any malalignment or instability valgus zrnd rheumatologic joint disease, hower.eq it present at the MTP joint. Exquisite point tenderness is likelv the etiology is due to a mechanical is localized plantarly, jr-rst clistal to the MTP joint at phenomenon secondary to excessive weight-bearing the insertion of the plantar plate apparatus into the stresses.l' The diagnosis of plantar plate dysfunction proximal phalan-x base.
    [Show full text]
  • DHMC MSK MRI Protocol Book (Version II) Last Updated 11/29/2020
    DHMC MSK MRI Protocol Book (Version II) Last Updated 11/29/2020 Select from the following three options: Imaging Planes Setup / Coverage Patient Positioning Protocol Parameters ©2020 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center The contents of DHMC’s MSK MRI Protocol Book (Version II) may not be reproduced without permission, but we are usually able – and happy – to extend such permission. Key Points on Using this Protocol Book Some Protocols have multiple ways to Position, Setup Planes, and Options for Parameters. Always scroll down to check!! This protocol book was built using Siemens as the main brand of machine in mind. The parameters and positioning listed in this book will not work on every brand (GE, Siemens, Philips) or strength (1.5T, 3T) of machine. They are meant to use as a starting point and to build onto. This protocol book contains a lot of T2 Fat Sat sequences. One of the most common issues is these specific sequences not coming out with uniform Fat Saturation. It is important to recognize when this happens, and simply resolve the issue by including a STIR, or a T2 Dixon. If the patient is moving, DO NOT REPEAT MORE THAN TWICE. If you are going to repeat, MAKE SURE YOU ADJUST SOMETHING. Repeating with no adjustments made is pointless. Not everyone scans the same way, but using this book will help bring everyone on to the right track. Lastly, ALWAYS DOCUMENT WHEN ISSUES ARRISE. This lets the radiologist know if something happened, whether it be technical, or patient related. BACK TO TOP MSK MRI Imaging Planes Setup / Coverage Upper Extremities Pelvis / Hips Lower Extremities Other Elbow Arthrogram (G+) Hip Arthrogram (G+) Achilles Tendon (G-) Pectoralis (G-) Elbow Routine (G-) Ankle Routine (G-) Tumor Func.
    [Show full text]