Paper-2 Man and Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paper-2 Man and Society MSW PAPER II MAN AND SOCIETY BY DR DILLIP MISHRA. Ph. D 1 MAN AND SOCIETY SYLLABUS UNIT-I SOCIETY AND CULTURE Concept of society & community- Association & Institutions-social groups & Man as Social Animal. Social process, -Types of Social Process. Culture, Society & Culture, Culture & Civilization, Characteristics of Indian Culture, cultural processes, Acculturation, Cultural conflict, Cultural lag, Culture & Personality. UNIT-II SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND INSTITUTIONS Social Organizations & Social Group Meaning, forms-nature & types of groups, primary- secondary, reference, in-groups, out-groups, group of dynamics, social stratification-basis of stratification status & rank, class, caste & state changing features of caste and theories of social stratification. UNIT-III Major Religions in India & their basic tenets, India as a Secular state. UNIT-IV SOCIAL CHANGE AND SOCIAL CONTROL Social Change and Social Control .Meaning – Agencies of Social Control- Custom, tradition & law, Factors of Social Change, Concept, Factors of social- change-Social change process in India-Sankritisation, Westernization, Secularization, and Modernization-Problems of Modernization. Socialization- the nature of Socialization, stages and agents of socialization. 2 “Society is a web of social relationships” -R.M.Maclver Unit-1 Objectives 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Concept of Society 1.2 Man is a Social Animal 1.3 Society & Culture 1.4 Characteristics of Indian Culture 1.5 Cultural Process 1.6 Culture & Personality Let us sum up Key Words Questions References 3 Objectives: To provide the knowledge of Society as the base of Social Work.”Community “a beginning and specialised concept related to Social Work Applications. Impotance of other related terms like, Association, Institution, Groups as differently used in social work .To provide basic knowledge of culture and its importance in Social Work . The concept Man is a social animal due to cultural influences .Primarily, Man learns cultural disciplines from the family, community which is very important for a social work learners. Idea of Group and Group importance also discussed from the concept of Social Work Applications. 1.1.Concept of Society.: For Social Work students,” Community “is the basic element where a student primarily stands and started his social work .The primary work a student does that to deal with the people living in the community & society .Many students are getting confused the difference between “Society” and “Community”. When for a social work student, Society is the laboratory and a student experiments his ideas his innovations in it .So, society is the primary and only thing where from beginning to the end of social work he has to deal with. So, let’s have a simple and common definition of sociology. That is, ‘Sociology is the scientific study of society’. Hence, the first and foremost aim of the students of sociology is to understand the concept of ‘society’. But students remembers that in Society the other related human organisations also specifically used for example “Community” ,”Associations”, “Groups” are the specific groups where the social work students commonly works .But these are the basic selective form of the “Society “ The term society has been derived from the Latin word “Socius” which means a companion, association or fellowship. It is because man always lives in the company of his fellow beings. This led George Simmel to remark that sociability is the essence of society. The term society is understood in different sense. In our day-to-day discussion society is used to refer to the members of specific in group; for example- Adivasi Society, Harijan Society etc. Some other time it refers to some institutions like Arya Samaj, Brahmo Samaj. At some other time, society refers to an association like customer’s society, co-operative society or cultural society. Society is also used in the sense of a group such as rural society or urban society. As a member of society every individual so also the students of sociology were familiar with the term society. But as a student of sociology one needs to acquaint oneself with the technical meaning or the trust sociological meaning of the term society from the outset. Because, this sociological meaning bears a special importance for the students of sociology. It is due to the fact that as a concept society means one thing to an ordinary individual and another to a sociologist. Hence, an attempt is made to explain the sociological meaning of the term. 4 The concept of Society does not refer simply to a group of people associated for a social life .But; society refers not to a group of people only but to the complex pattern of the norms, interaction and relationships that arise among them. A person exists only as an agent of social relationships. Mere congregation of individuals does not constitute society. Rather society refers to the complex network of social relationships by which every individual is interrelated with his fellowmen. Hence, society is abstract, not concrete, in nature. We can’t touch it but feel it. Society resides in the minds of individual. Society is a process of living not a thing, a motion rather than structure. A system of social relationships is the most important aspect of society. Not all relationships are social. A social relationship implies reciprocal awareness among individuals. This reciprocal awareness direct and indirect are the characteristics of every social relationships. Some Popular Definitons by famous Sociologists 1) According to Ginsberg, “A society is a collection of individuals united by certain relations or modes of behaviour which mark them off from others, who do not enter into those relations or who differ from them in behaviour.” 2) According to F.H. Giddings, “Society is the union itself, the organization, the sum of formal relations in which associating individuals are bound together”. 3) According to G.D.H. Cole, “Society is the complex of organized associations and institutions within the community”. 4) According to J.F. Cuber, “A society may be defined as a group of people who have lived long enough to become organized and to consider themselves and be considered as a unit more or less distinct from other human units.” 5) Functional views of society: According to the functional views society is a process of social relationships. It considers society as a complex of groups in reciprocal relationship, interacting among themselves and carrying on an interdependent life and helping each other in fulfilling their wishes. Supporters of this view are MacIver and Page, Parsons, Cooley, Leacock and others. a. According to Maclver and Page, “Society is a system of usages and procedures, authority and mutual aid, of many groupings and divisions, of controls of human behavious and of liberties”. b. According to T.Parsons, “Society may be defined as the total complex of human relationship in so far as they grow out of action in terms of means and relationship, intrinsic or symbolic.” c. According to C.H. Cooley, “Society is a complex of forms and processes each of which is living and growing by interaction with the others, the whole being so unified that what takes place in one part affects all the rest.” 5 d. According to Leacock, “Society includes not only the political relations by which men are bound together but the whole range of human relations and collective activities.” This idea of reciprocal awareness is implied in F.H. Giddings definition of society i.e. “a number of like- minded individuals, who know and enjoy their like-mindedness and are, therefore, able to work together for common ends”. Thus, elements of society exist in the ‘Consciousness of Kind’ (Giddings), with the psychology of, ‘we feeling’ (Cooley) or ‘a common propensity (W.I. Thomas). 6 Origin of Society (Sociologists View) Man is a social animal. Before we explain the relationship between man and society, it may be worthwhile to explain the origin of society. Origin of the Society is only the theoretically expectations of the eminent sociologists .In their writings they speak their expectations of the society .Originally these are the basic remarks of them .These theories have different scientific explanations of their own social scientists. Different Theories and their values A number of theories have been put forward to explain the origin of society. Thus the Divine Origin theory makes society the creation of God. Just as God created all the animals and inanimate objects of this world, so he created the society as well. This theory in course of time, particularly in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries took the form of Divine Right Theory. The Force Theory makes society the result of superior physical force. According to this theory, the society originated in the subjugation of the weaker by the stronger. In the primitive times the man of exceptional physical strength was able to overawe his fellowmen and to exercise some kind of authority over them. Thus through physical coercion or compulsion men were brought together and made to live in society. The Patriarchal and Matriarchal theories make society the expansion of family system. Sir Henry Maine defines patriarchal theory as the theory of the origin of society in separate families, held together by the authority and protection of the eldest make descendant. He believed that society is the family writ large. The matriarchal theory suggests that polyandry and transient marriage relations were more common in primitive times than monogamy or polygamy. Under such circumstances, descendence is traced through the mother as Maine points out motherhood in such cases is a fact, while paternity is only an opinion. a. Scientific nature of Social Contract Theory: In addition to these theories the social contract theory vies society as a contrivance deliberately set up by men for certain ends. According to this theory, all men were born free and equal.
Recommended publications
  • Memoirs on the History, Folk-Lore, and Distribution of The
    ' *. 'fftOPE!. , / . PEIHCETGIT \ rstC, juiv 1 THEOLOGICAL iilttTlKV'ki ' • ** ~V ' • Dive , I) S 4-30 Sect; £46 — .v-..2 SUPPLEMENTAL GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THE NORTH WESTERN PROVINCES. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/memoirsonhistory02elli ; MEMOIRS ON THE HISTORY, FOLK-LORE, AND DISTRIBUTION RACESOF THE OF THE NORTH WESTERN PROVINCES OF INDIA BEING AN AMPLIFIED EDITION OF THE ORIGINAL SUPPLEMENTAL GLOSSARY OF INDIAN TERMS, BY THE J.ATE SIR HENRY M. ELLIOT, OF THE HON. EAST INDIA COMPANY’S BENGAL CIVIL SEBVICB. EDITED REVISED, AND RE-ARRANGED , BY JOHN BEAMES, M.R.A.S., BENGAL CIVIL SERVICE ; MEMBER OP THE GERMAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY, OP THE ASIATIC SOCIETIES OP PARIS AND BENGAL, AND OF THE PHILOLOGICAL SOCIBTY OP LONDON. IN TWO VOLUMES. YOL. II. LONDON: TRUBNER & CO., 8 and 60, PATERNOSTER ROWV MDCCCLXIX. [.All rights reserved STEPHEN AUSTIN, PRINTER, HERTFORD. ; *> »vv . SUPPLEMENTAL GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THE NORTH WESTERN PROVINCES. PART III. REVENUE AND OFFICIAL TERMS. [Under this head are included—1. All words in use in the revenue offices both of the past and present governments 2. Words descriptive of tenures, divisions of crops, fiscal accounts, like 3. and the ; Some articles relating to ancient territorial divisions, whether obsolete or still existing, with one or two geographical notices, which fall more appro- priately under this head than any other. —B.] Abkar, jlLT A distiller, a vendor of spirituous liquors. Abkari, or the tax on spirituous liquors, is noticed in the Glossary. With the initial a unaccented, Abkar means agriculture. Adabandi, The fixing a period for the performance of a contract or pay- ment of instalments.
    [Show full text]
  • Transient Solidarities: Commitment and Collective Action in Post-Industrial Societies Charles Heckscher and John Mccarthy
    bs_bs_banner British Journal of Industrial Relations doi: 10.1111/bjir.12084 52:4 December 2014 0007–1080 pp. 627–657 Transient Solidarities: Commitment and Collective Action in Post-Industrial Societies Charles Heckscher and John McCarthy Abstract Solidarity has long been considered essential to labour, but many fear that it has declined. There has been relatively little scholarly investigation of it because of both theoretical and empirical difficulties. This article argues that solidarity has not declined but has changed in form, which has an impact on what kinds of mobilization are effective. We first develop a theory of solidarity general enough to compare different forms. We then trace the evolution of solidarity through craft and industrial versions, to the emergence of collaborative solidarity from the increasingly fluid ‘friending’ relations of recent decades. Finally, we examine the question of whether these new solidarities can be mobilized into effective collective action, and suggest mechanisms, rather different from tra- ditional union mobilizations, that have shown some power in drawing on friending relations: the development of member platforms, the use of purposive campaigns and the co-ordination of ‘swarming’ actions. In the best cases, these can create collective actions that make a virtue of diversity, openness and participative engagement, by co-ordinating groups with different foci and skills. 1. Introduction In the last 30 years, there is every evidence that labour solidarity has weak- ened across the industrialized world. Strikes have widely declined, while the most effective recent movements have been fundamentalist and restrictive — turning back to traditional values and texts, narrowing the range of inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Shifting and Multiple Selves Across Cultures Christine J
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center School of Education Faculty Research School of Education 2004 The oS cialization of Self: Understanding Shifting and Multiple Selves across Cultures Christine J. Yeh University of San Francisco, [email protected] C D. Hunter Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/soe_fac Part of the Psychology Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Yeh, C. J., & Hunter, C. D. (2004). The ocs ialization of self: Understanding shifting and multiple selves across cultures. In R. T. Carter (Ed.), Handbook of racial-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 78-93). John Wiley: New York. ISBN: 978-0-471-38629-2 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Education Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHAPTER6 The Socialization of Self: Understanding Shifting and Multiple Selves across Cultures Christine J. Yeh and Carla D. Hunter Understanding the relationship between socialization experiences and individuals' functioning is the core of Western psychological theory and practice (Bandura, 1965; Erikson, 1963; Freud, 1943; Wiggins, 1973). Who am I? What is my role in my fam­ ily, in society? How do I relate to other people? What types of behaviors are socially acceptable? How do I understand who I am in relationship to others? The answer to these questions lead many to have diverse life experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Structure and Political Ideology
    CLASS STRUCTURE AND POLITICAL IDEOLOGY Val Burris Marxist theorists have devoted much eVort recently to the clari cation of the concept of class and the elaboration of alternative models of class structure. The main focus of this theorizing has been the class position of salaried intermediaries and their role in the class struggle. With a few exceptions, most Marxists today recognize the existence in advanced capitalist society of a signi cant group of people who cannot be included in the working class, even though they work for a salary or wage. Various names have been applied, to this group—“new middle class,” “new petty bourgeoisie,” or “professional-managerial class”—and com- peting theories have been advanced to explain the nature and signi cance of these positions within the class structure. Disagreements over how to conceptualize intermediate class positions have prompted extensive debates over the basic principles of Marxist class analysis and the application of those principles to modern capitalist society. Three issues have been central to this debate. First is the de nitional question of specifying the boundaries of classes—especially the bound- ary which separates intermediate class positions from the working class. Second is the conceptual issue of clarifying the nature and identity of these intermediate class positions. Do they qualify as a “class” in the full sense of the term? lf so, do they constitute a new class within advanced capitalism or the evolution of some earlier intermediate class? Third is the political question of predicting the alignment of this group in the struggle between capital and labor.
    [Show full text]
  • When Do People Trust Their Social Groups?
    When Do People Trust Their Social Groups? Xiao Ma1†, Justin Cheng2, Shankar Iyer2, Mor Naaman1 1Jacobs Institute, Cornell Tech, 2Facebook {xiao,mor}@jacobs.cornell.edu,{jcheng,shankar94}@fb.com ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Trust facilitates cooperation and supports positive outcomes Trust contributes to the success of social groups by encourag- in social groups, including member satisfaction, information ing people to interpret others’ actions and intentions favor- sharing, and task performance. Extensive prior research has ably, thereby facilitating cooperation and a sense of commu- examined individuals’ general propensity to trust, as well as nity [5, 22, 33, 55, 60, 74]. In groups, trust increases member the factors that contribute to their trust in specific groups. satisfaction, and task performance; reduces conflict [33, 77]; Here, we build on past work to present a comprehensive and promotes effective response to crisis [53]. framework for predicting trust in groups. By surveying 6,383 Previous research has examined how different factors such Facebook Groups users about their trust attitudes and ex- as size [13, 21, 83], group cohesiveness [38], and activity [77] amining aggregated behavioral and demographic data for may impact people’s trust in their social groups, both on- these individuals, we show that (1) an individual’s propen- line [39] and offline [67]. However, previous studies tend sity to trust is associated with how they trust their groups, to be small in scale, limited to specific contexts (e.g., online (2) groups that are smaller, closed, older, more exclusive or marketplaces), or only consider a specific type of group more homogeneous are trusted more, and (3) a group’s over- (e.g., organizations [18, 50]).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Relation Recognition from Videos Via Multi-Scale Spatial-Temporal Reasoning
    Social Relation Recognition from Videos via Multi-scale Spatial-Temporal Reasoning Xinchen Liu†, Wu Liu†, Meng Zhang†, Jingwen Chen§, Lianli Gao¶, Chenggang Yan§, and Tao Mei† †JD AI Research, Beijing, China §Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China ¶University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China {liuxinchen1, zhangmeng1208}@jd.com, [email protected] {jingwenchen, cgyan}@hdu.edu.cn, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Discovering social relations, e.g., kinship, friendship, Colleague etc., from visual contents can make machines better inter- pret the behaviors and emotions of human beings. Existing Man A Man A Standing Man A Woman B Woman A Woman B Woman A studies mainly focus on recognizing social relations from Woman B Talking Chair Cup still images while neglecting another important media— Door Door Writing Desk Door Document Meeting video. On the one hand, the actions and storylines in videos Document Document Room provide more important cues for social relation recogni- tion. On the other hand, the key persons may appear at arbitrary spatial-temporal locations, even not in one same Couple image from beginning to the end. To overcome these chal- lenges, we propose a Multi-scale Spatial-Temporal Reason- Standing Man A Woman A Man A Woman A Woman A Man A ing (MSTR) framework to recognize social relations from Smiling videos. For the spatial representation, we not only adopt a Hat Hat Hugging Bag Tree Hat temporal segment network to learn global action and scene Grass Grass Mower Outdoors information, but also design a Triple Graphs model to cap- ture visual relations between persons and objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Relations on Multicultural Society in the Context of Social Change: Indonesian Perspective
    SOCIAL RELATIONS ON MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL CHANGE: INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVE H. Tobroni University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract Indonesia is one of the world mosaics. Vast archipelagic territory from Sabang to Merauke, there are hundreds of ethnics and languages and religions, making Indonesia one of the world's wonders. Develop appropriate patterns of social relations in a multi- cultural society such as this to be an important issue that horizontal conflicts and separatism can be avoided. Social change and social transformation in the political system from the bureaucratic system of the New Order authoritarian to democratic reform era in the setting- liberal globalization has implications for horizontal conflict, mass rioting and even separatism in various areas. Religious differences also play a role in increasing the scale of the conflict. The solution is not enough just through security approach and structural approach, but also takes a cultural approach and other approaches are more humane. develop the mind set of multiculturalism, tolerance and inter-religious cooperation and humanitarian projects and humanizing become more effective and more eternal in creating social resilience in a multi-cultural society in Indonesia. Key words: Indonesia, Multiculturalism, religious, Tolerance [43] 1. Introduction The development of post-modernism and globalization in the context of social relation affects several aspects of life including the structural, cultural, and behavioral aspects. Some of the structural changes include the democratization urgency and autonomy based on the cultural identity. The cultural changes show the development of pluralism and multiculturalism at the same time. While the pluralism emphasizes the equality of several different cultures and ethnics including religion, multiculturalism emphasizes the importance of co-existence of many different cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Money and Class Society: the Contributions of John F
    Working Paper No. 832 The Rise of Money and Class Society: The Contributions of John F. Henry by Alla Semenova* State University of New York, Potsdam L. Randall Wray† Levy Economics Institute of Bard College February 2015 * [email protected][email protected] The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2015 All rights reserved Abstract This paper explores the rise of money and class society in ancient Greece, drawing historical and theoretical parallels to the case of ancient Egypt. In doing so, the paper examines the historical applicability of the chartalist and metallist theories of money. It will be shown that the origins and the evolution of money were closely intertwined with the rise and consolidation of class society and inequality. Money, class society, and inequality came into being simultaneously, so it seems, mutually reinforcing the development of one another. Rather than a medium of exchange in commerce, money emerged as an “egalitarian token” at the time when the substance of social relations was undergoing a fundamental transformation from egalitarian to class societies.
    [Show full text]
  • School Competition and Social Stratification in the Deregulated Upper Secondary School Market in Stockholm
    British Journal of Sociology of Education ISSN: 0142-5692 (Print) 1465-3346 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbse20 School competition and social stratification in the deregulated upper secondary school market in Stockholm Håkan Forsberg To cite this article: Håkan Forsberg (2018) School competition and social stratification in the deregulated upper secondary school market in Stockholm, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39:6, 891-907, DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2018.1426441 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1426441 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 01 Feb 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1492 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cbse20 BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2018 VOL. 39, NO. 6, 891–907 https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1426441 OPEN ACCESS School competition and social stratification in the deregulated upper secondary school market in Stockholm Håkan Forsberga,b aDepartment of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; bSociology of Education and Culture (SEC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Drawing on the case of upper secondary education in Stockholm, this Received 4 January 2017 article analyses school-based responses to a superimposed market Accepted 8 January 2018 and how this is related to social stratification. Furthermore, schools’ KEYWORDS and pupils’ encounters with the market are analysed in relation to School choice; school Bourdieu’s concepts of field, capital and strategy. Methodologically, market; stratification; upper the quantitative method of correspondence analysis is combined secondary education; social with semi-structured interviews with senior administrative officers class and principals.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Approaches to Power | Bob Jessop
    Marxist Approaches to Power | Bob Jessop http://bobjessop.org/2014/03/27/marxist-approaches-to-power/ Home News Books Short Works Audio Video CV Contact Bob Jessop / March 27, 2014 This on-line version is the pre-copyedited, preprint version. The published version can be found here: ‘Marxist Approaches to Power’ in E. Amenta, K. Nash, A. Scott, eds, The Wiley- Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, Oxford: Blackwell, 3-14, 2012. Marxist approaches to power focus on its relation to class domination in capitalist societies. Power is linked to class relations in economics, politics, and ideology. In capitalist social formations, the state is considered to be particularly important in securing the conditions for economic class domination. Marxists are also interested in why dominated classes seem to accept (or fail to recognize) their oppression; so they address issues of resistance and strategies to bring about radical change. Much recent Marxist analysis also aims to show how class power is dispersed throughout society, in order to avoid economic reductionism. This chapter summarizes the main trends in contemporary Marxism and identifies some significant spatio-temporal aspects of class domination. It also assesses briefly the disadvantages of Marxism as a sociological analysis of power. These include its neglect of forms of social domination that are not directly related to class; a tendency to over-emphasize the coherence of class domination; the continuing problem of economic reductionism; and the opposite danger of a voluntaristic account of resistance to capitalism. *** 1 of 12 8/5/2014 7:19 PM Marxist Approaches to Power | Bob Jessop http://bobjessop.org/2014/03/27/marxist-approaches-to-power/ Marxists have analyzed power relations in many different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 16 Village Community
    UNIT 16 VILLAGE COMMUNITY Structure 16.0 Introduction 16.1 What is a Village Community? 16.2 Panch or Panch-Muqaddam 16.3 Functions and Powers 16.4 Summary 16.5 Exercises 16.0 INTRODUCTION Harold H. Mann insists that the heart of India is in its villages, and argues that “If we want to understand the history of the country we must seek far more in the obscure unprinted records of village vicissitudes than in the more showy array of documents concerning conquests and governments, princes and their retainers or palaces and their inhabitants”. To understand the village community in a subtler manner, it is essential to know: What is a village? The reference of existence of village is found in sources of pre-colonial India. The words deh (Persian word for village) and gaon or ganve are frequently used in the literary sources and the folk traditions. Mughal Empire’s territorial divisions are well known to us. These divisions were perceived on the basis of rivers, mountains, deserts and languages. Ain-i Akbari also reflects how the Mughal empire was divided into subas/sarkars/parganas. The parganas had a varying number of villages. These numbers are known from the Amber- Jaipur documents, particularly from the Arsattas, apart from other sources. Also seventeenth century documents from Rajasthan and Haryana show the small number of cultivators in the villages which reflect the small size of villages in pre-colonial India. Documents from Deccan, South India etc. also reflect the varying sizes of the villages from tiny hamlets to populous settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Accelerating Human Development in Asia and the Pacific
    TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Accelerating Human Development in Asia and the Pacific Published for the United Nations Development Programme Copyright ©2008 by the United Nations Development Programme Regional Centre in Colombo, Human Development Report Unit 23 Independence Avenue, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published, 2008 Published for UNDP by Macmillan India Ltd. MACMILLAN INDIA LTD. Delhi Bangalore Chennai Kolkata Mumbai Ahmedabad Bhopal Chandigarh Coimbatore Cuttack Guwahati Hubli Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Madurai Nagpur Patna Pune Thiruvananthapuram Visakhapatnam MACMILLAN WORLDWIDE Australia Brazil Cambodia China Egypt France Germany India Japan Korea Malaysia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Philippines Russia Singapore South Africa Switzerland Thailand Turkey United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States of America Vietnam and others ISBN CORP-000130 Assigned UN sales number: E.08.III.B.2 Published by Rajiv Beri for Macmillan India Ltd. 2/10 Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110 002 Printed at Sanat Printers 312 EPIP, Kundli 131 028 TEAM FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE Asia-Pacific Human Development Report TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Team Leader Anuradha Rajivan Core Team: Gry Ballestad, Elena Borsatti, The Asia-Pacific Human Development
    [Show full text]