DOCSLIB.ORG

An Attempt to Calibrate the UHF Strato-Tropospheric Radar at Arecibo Using Nexrad Radar and Disdrometer Data P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Attempt to Calibrate the UHF Strato-Tropospheric Radar at Arecibo Using Nexrad Radar and Disdrometer Data P An attempt to calibrate the UHF strato-tropospheric radar at Arecibo using NexRad radar and disdrometer data P. Kafando, Monique Petitdidier To cite this version: P. Kafando, Monique Petitdidier. An attempt to calibrate the UHF strato-tropospheric radar at Arecibo using NexRad radar and disdrometer data. Annales Geophysicae, European Geosciences Union, 2004, 22 (12), pp.4025-4034. 10.5194/angeo-22-4025-2004. hal-00159569 HAL Id: hal-00159569 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00159569 Submitted on 31 Dec 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annales Geophysicae (2004) 22: 4025–4034 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2004-22-4025 Annales © European Geosciences Union 2004 Geophysicae An attempt to calibrate the UHF strato-tropospheric radar at Arecibo using NexRad radar and disdrometer data P. Kafando1,2 and M. Petitdidier1 1Centre d’Etudes des Environ. Terr. et Planetaire/Inst.´ Pierre Simon Laplace, 10–12 Av. de l’Europe, 78140 Velizy,´ France 2on leave to: Ouagadougou University, 04 B.P.8306 Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso Received: 2 December 2003 – Revised: 18 June 2004 – Accepted: 20 July 2004 – Published: 22 December 2004 Abstract. The goal of this paper is to present a methodology Key words. Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (trop- to calibrate the reflectivity of the UHF Strato-Tropospheric ical meteorology; remote sensing; instruments and tech- (ST) radar located at NAIC in Puerto Rico. The UHF niques) lower relevant altitude is at 5.9 km, the melting layer being at around 4.8 km. The data used for the calibration came from the observations of clouds, carried out with Strato- Tropospheric dual-wavelength (UHF and VHF) radars and a 1 Introduction disdrometer; those instruments being located on the NAIC site in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. The National Weather Ser- Calibration of UHF/VHF wind profilers is essential to obtain vice operates other instruments like the radiosondes and the absolute radar reflectivities and their variation as a function NexRad Radar in other sites. of time and meteorological conditions. Reflectivity is used 2 The proposed method proceeds in two steps. The first to characterize the turbulence intensity through Cn, the hy- consists of the comparison between the NexRad reflectivity drometeors precipitating or non-precipitating. At VHF the and the reflectivity computed from the drop size distributions contribution of the sky noise and its diurnal variation could measured by the disdrometer for one day with a noticeable be used to calibrate ST radars while at UHF the sky noise rainfall rate. In spite of the distance of both instruments, the contribution is relatively small and is overwhelmed by the agreement between the reflectivities of both instruments is instrument noise (Campistron et al., 2001; Petitdidier et al., enough good to be used as a reference for the UHF ST radar. 1997). At UHF when the lowest reliable height is below the The errors relative at each data set is found to be 2.75 dB for melting layer, precipitation parameters are compared with the disdrometer and 4 dB for the NexRad radar, following the the ones measured with ground-based precipitation measure- approach of Hocking et al. (2001). The inadequacy between ments like a disdrometer (Gage et al., 2000; William et al., the two sampled volume is an important contribution in the 2000). In case of the UHF wind profiler at the National As- errors. tronomy and Ionospheric Center (NAIC) in Arecibo on the island of Puerto Rico, the lowest reliable height is above the The second step consists of the comparison between the melting layer, and then it is not possible to relate the hydrom- NexRad radar reflectivity and the UHF non-calibrated reflec- eteor characteristics to precipitation ones measured at ground tivity at the 4 altitudes of common observations during one level. event on 15 October 1998. Similar features are observed and a coefficient is deduced. An offset around 4.7 dB is observed The purpose of this work is to present an attempt to cali- and the correlation factor lies between 0.628 and 0.730. Ac- brate indirectly the backscattered signal of a ST UHF radar. cording to the errors of the data sets, the precision on the The data concerned by the calibration were taken at NAIC, calibration is of the order of 2 dB. This method works only in September/October 1998 during a campaign to observe when there are precipitation hydrometeors above the NAIC tropical thunderstorms (Petitdidier et al., 2000). The obser- site. However, the result of the calibration could be applied to vations of several clouds were carried out with the Strato- other data obtained during the campaign, the only constraint Tropospheric dual-wavelength (UHF and VHF) radars, an being the same value of the transmitter power. electric field mill, and a disdrometer, those instruments be- ing located on the NAIC site. The National Weather Service has operated other instruments like the rain gauges, radioson- Correspondence to: M. Petitdidier des and the Doppler weather radar, NexRad. Thus, the data ([email protected]) collected will be used to describe tropical thunderstorms. 4026 P. Kafando and M. Petitdidier: Calibration of the UHF strato-tropospheric radar The proposed calibration approach combines data from the Table 1. Geographical coordinates of the different instruments. disdrometer, the NexRad radar and the ST UHF radar. In the calibration of scanning weather radar, Gage et al. (2000) ex- tended the disdrometer results to larger scales and to higher Latitude Longitude Altitude (m) altitudes by means of a vertically directed UHF wind profiler. ◦ 0 ◦ 0 In our situation, the approach to calibrate the ST UHF radar NexRad 18 6.94 N 66 4.68 W 881.5 Disdrometer 18◦ 20.850N 66◦ 45.250W 364.24 must be different and the method consists of using the re- UHF Profiler 18◦ 20.610N 66◦ 45.180W 230 flectivity computed from the drop-size distribution measure- ments by the disdrometer, to calibrate the reflectivity of the weather Doppler radar, NexRad, which, in turn, is used to calibrate the ST UHF reflectivity. Thus, it is vital that the samples. Ulbrich et al. (1999) carried out a first analysis of initial relation, upon which this sequence of calibrations is the disdrometer data, obtained during the campaign. based, be as accurate as possible. The JWD records the number of raindrops, nd , of diame- This paper describes the calibration of the ST UHF radar i ter D , in each of its 20 diameter channels, for a 1-min sam- by using the NexRad radar located in Cayey (Puerto Rico). In i pling period. The DSD, N(D ), expressed in m−3 mm−1, is the first part of the paper, the simultaneous measurements are i computed from these counts nd by using: selected and the data obtained by the different instruments i presented. The second part addresses the NexRad calibra- ndi N(Di) = , (1) tion. In order to avoid any assumption for the Z−R relation- S ∗ dt ∗ v(Di) ∗ ddi ship that it is highly variable during one event, reflectivities 2 are compared. The third part concerns the UHF ST radar cal- where the measuring area, S, is equal to 0.0050 m ; dt is the ibration. The comparison between the reflectivity observed sampling period equal to 60 s; Di is the mean diameter (mm) by the UHF radar and the NexRad radar is carried out. As for the ith channel, ddi is the ith channel width (mm); v(Di) is the fall speed in still air of a drop of diameter Di, expressed the attenuation of the UHF backscattered signal varies as a −1 function of time, to avoid the receiver saturation the gain dur- in m s . ing the different periods has to be evaluated using the noise From the DSD, the rainfall rate and the radar reflectivity power spectral density. Then the backscattered signal is cor- are deduced: rected by this factor and the comparison is done in the com- Z ∞ R = 6π×10−4π v(D) D3 N(D) dD (2) mon range. 0 where R is expressed in mm/h; v(D) in m/s, D and dD in mm, − − 2 Data and N(D) in m 3mm 1. ∞ 2.1 Description (disdrometer, NexRad, UHF/VHF wind Z Z = D6N(D)dD , (3) profilers) 0 During the whole campaign, outside the period of the hurri- where Z, the equivalent reflectivity, is expressed in mm6m−3 cane Georges’ passage, there were 18 days out of 29 when with N(D) in m−3mm−1 and D, dD in mm. the disdrometer detected rain but only 7 days with a rain The drawback of the instrument occurs during strong amount larger than 10 mm. The Doppler weather radar, rains. The impact of large drops causes such a strong in- NexRad, data were available only for a few days (10 common ternal noise response that the signal due to any small drop periods with the ST radar observations out of 18) during the arriving during the ensuing few milliseconds – the dead time campaign. As a consequence, simultaneous measurements of – is not detectable (e.g. Sauvageot et Lacaux, 1995). Ap- disdrometer, ST UHF radar and NexRad Radar occurred only plying the dead time correction proposed by the manufac- on 3 days, 18 and 30 September and 15 October, out of 7 no- turer has the effect of increasing the numbers of small drops, ticeable rainfall events.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operating Instructions Present Weather Sensor Parsivel
    Operating instructions Present Weather Sensor Parsivel English We reserve the right to make technical changes! Table of contents 1 Scope of delivery 5 2 Part numbers 5 3 Parsivel Factory Settings 6 4 Safety instructions 7 5 Introduction 8 5.1 Functional principle 8 5.2 Connection Options for the Parsivel 9 6 Installing the Parsivel 10 6.1 Cable Selection 10 6.2 Wiring the Parsivel 11 6.3 Grounding the Parsivel 13 6.4 Installing the Parsivel 14 7 Connecting the Parsivel to a data logger 15 7.1 Connecting the Parsivel to the LogoSens Station Manager via RS-485 interface 15 7.2 Connecting the Parsivel to a Data logger via the SDI-12 Interface 17 7.3 Connecting the Parsivel to a Data Logger with Impulse/Status Input 21 8 Connecting the Parsivel to a PC 23 8.1 Connecting the Parsivel to Interface Converter RS-485/RS-232 (Accessories) 23 8.2 Connecting the Parsivel to the ADAM-4520 Converter RS-485/RS-232 (Accessories) 25 8.3 Connecting the Parsivel to Interface Converter RS-485/USB (Accessories) 26 8.4 Connecting the Parsivel to any RS-485 Interface Converter 27 8.5 Connecting the Parsivel for configuration via the Service-Tool to a PC 27 9 Connecting the Parsivel to a Power Supply (Accessory) 29 10 Heating the Parsivel sensor heads 30 11 Operating Parsivel with a Terminal software 31 11.1 Set up communications between the Parsivel and the terminal program 31 11.2 Measured value numbers 32 11.3 Defining the formatting string 33 11.4 OTT telegram 33 11.5 Updating Parsivel Firmware 34 12 Maintenance 36 12.1 Cleaning the laser’s protective glass
    [Show full text]
  • Disdrometer Performance Optimization for Use in Urban Settings Based on the Parameters That Affect the Measurements
    S S symmetry Article Disdrometer Performance Optimization for Use in Urban Settings Based on the Parameters that Affect the Measurements Ferran Mocholí Belenguer 1,* , Antonio Martínez-Millana 2 , Antonio Mocholí Salcedo 3 , Víctor Milián Sánchez 4 and María Josefa Palomo Anaya 4 1 Traffic Control Systems Group, ITACA Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain 2 SABIEN Group, ITACA Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 3 Department of Electronic Engineering, ITACA Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 4 Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Department, Institute of Industrial, Radiological and Environmental Safety, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (V.M.S.); [email protected] (M.J.P.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-610833056 Received: 15 November 2019; Accepted: 13 February 2020; Published: 20 February 2020 Abstract: There are currently different types of commercial optical disdrometers to measure the rainfall intensity, of which many are commonly used for monitoring road conditions. Having information about the amount of rain, the composition of the precipitation particles and visibility are essential to avoid accidents, which requires intelligent systems that warn drivers and redirect traffic. However, few studies related to Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) have been performed regarding why these devices are not optimized for this type of applications. Therefore, this paper analyzes and evaluates the operating mode of these equipment through their theoretical model, which will allow the design of prototypes of disdrometers with different characteristics. In addition, this model will be implemented in a simulation program, through which an exhaustive study analyzing how the type of precipitation and its intensity affect the measures provided by the model will be conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Thies Laser Precipitation Monitor
    Instruction for Use 021341/07/11 Laser Precipitation Monitor 5.4110.xx.x00 V2.5x STD WEATHER DATA - THE WORLD OF INVISIBLE LASER RADIATION DO NOT VIEW DIRECTLY WITH OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS CLASS 1M LASER PRODUCT ADOLF THIES GmbH & Co. KG Hauptstraße 76 37083 Göttingen Germany Box 3536 + 3541 37025 Göttingen Phone +49 551 79001-0 Fax +49 551 79001-65 www.thiesclima.com [email protected] THE WORLD OF WEATHER DATA - Safety Instructions • Before operating with or at the device/product, read through the operating instructions. This manual contains instructions which should be followed on mounting, start-up, and operation. A non-observance might cause: - failure of important functions - Endangering of persons by electrical or mechanic effect - Damages at objects • Mounting, electrical connection and wiring of the device/product must be carried out only by a qualified technician who is familiar with and observes the engineering regulations, provisions and standards applicable in each case. • Repairs and maintenance may only be carried out by trained staff or Adolf Thies GmbH & Co. KG. Only components and spare parts supplied and/or recommended by Adolf Thies GmbH & Co. KG should be used for repairs. • Electrical devices/products must be mounted and wired only in voltage-free state. • Adolf Thies GmbH & Co KG guarantees proper functioning of the device/products provided that no modifications have been made to the mechanics, electronics or software, and that the following points are observed: • All information, warnings and instructions for use included in these operating instructions must be taken into account and observed as this is essential to ensure trouble-free operation and a safe condition of the measuring system / device / product.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Compact Dopplar Radar Rain Gauge and Optical
    Short Paper J. Agric. Meteorol. 67 (3): 199–204, 2011 Comparison of the compact dopplar radar rain gauge and optical disdrometer Ko NAKAYA†, and Yasushi TOYODA (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1646 Abiko, Abiko, Chiba, 270–1194, Japan) Abstract The operations of a compact Doppler radar rain gauge (R2S; Rufft, FRG) and optical disdrometer (LPM; THIES, FRG) are based on raindrop size distribution (DSD) measurements. We checked the instrumental error of these sensors and compared each sensor with a reference tipping-bucket rain gauge. This is because both rain gauges can detect fine particles and so they can function as rain sensors. The R2S has a measuring bias of rainfall intensity when the drop size distribution differs from the assumed statistical DSD model. The instrumental error on the LPM is small; in fact, the LPM shows good agreement with the reference rain gauge. Where the atmospheric density differs remarkably from the standard elevation, as is the case in highland areas, the R2S requires calibration using a reference rain gauge. The resultant calibration coefficient of the R2S to convert the reading into a reference tip- ping-bucket rain-gauge equivalent was 0.51 in a forest at an elevation of 1380 m. Further gathering of calibration coefficients obtained at different elevations will improve the R2S’s applicability. Key words: Doppler radar rain gauge, Drop size distribution, Optical disdrometer, Tipping-bucket rain gauge. Although the accuracy and suggested errors of rainfall 1. Introduction observations using typical Doppler radar have been Rainfall properties, such as the intensity, amount, reviewed in many studies (Maki et al., 1998, for duration, and type, constitute important meteorological example), reviews for the R2S compared to a reference information that is useful for agriculture and forestation rain gauge are few.
    [Show full text]
  • Ott Parsivel - Enhanced Precipitation Identifier for Present Weather, Drop Size Distribution and Radar Reflectivity - Ott Messtechnik, Germany
    ® OTT PARSIVEL - ENHANCED PRECIPITATION IDENTIFIER FOR PRESENT WEATHER, DROP SIZE DISTRIBUTION AND RADAR REFLECTIVITY - OTT MESSTECHNIK, GERMANY Kurt Nemeth1, Martin Löffler-Mang2 1 OTT Messtechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Kempten (Germany) 2 HTW, Saarbrücken (Germany) as a laser-optic enhanced precipitation identifier and present weather sensor. The patented extinction method for simultaneous measurements of particle size and velocity of all liquid and solid precipitation employs a direct physical measurement principle and classification of hydrometeors. The instrument provides a full picture of precipitation events during any kind of weather phenomenon and provides accurate reporting of precipitation types, accumulation and intensities without degradation of per- formance in severe outdoor environments. Parsivel® operates in any climate regime and the built-in heating device minimizes the negative effect of freezing and frozen precipitation accreting critical surfaces on the instrument. Parsivel® can be integrated into an Automated Surface/ Weather Observing System (ASOS/AWOS) as part of the sensor suite. The derived data can be processed and 1. Introduction included into transmitted weather observation reports and messages (WMO, SYNOP, METAR and NWS codes). ® OTT Parsivel : Laser based optical Disdrometer for 1.2. Performance, accuracy and calibration procedure simultaneous measurement of PARticle SIze and VELocity of all liquid and solid precipitation. This state The new generation of Parsivel® disdrometer provides of the art instrument, designed to operate under all the latest state of the art optical laser technology. Each weather conditions, is capable of fulfilling multiple hydrometeor, which falls through the measuring area is meteorological applications: present weather sensing, measured simultaneously for size and velocity with an optical precipitation gauging, enhanced precipitation acquisition cycle of 50 kHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Present and Past Weather; State of the Ground
    CHAPTER CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 14. OBSERVATION OF PRESENT AND PAST WEATHER; STATE OF THE GROUND .. 450 14.1 General ................................................................... 450 14.1.1 Definitions ......................................................... 450 14.1.2 Units and scales ..................................................... 450 14.1.3 Meteorological requirements ......................................... 451 14.1.4 Observation methods. 451 14.2 Observation of present and past weather ...................................... 451 14.2.1 Precipitation. 452 14.2.1.1 Objects of observation ....................................... 452 14.2.1.2 Instruments and measuring devices: precipitation type ........... 452 14.2.1.3 Instruments and measuring devices: precipitation intensity and character ............................................... 454 14.2.1.4 Instruments and measuring devices: multi-sensor approach ....... 455 14.2.2 Atmospheric obscurity and suspensoids ................................ 455 14.2.2.1 Objects of observation ....................................... 455 14.2.2.2 Instruments and measuring devices for obscurity and suspensoid characteristics .................................... 455 14.2.3 Other weather events ................................................ 456 14.2.3.1 Objects of observation ....................................... 456 14.2.3.2 Instruments and measuring devices. 457 14.2.4 State of the sky ...................................................... 457 14.2.4.1 Objects of observation ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Buoy Cooperation Panel 10.3- Guidelines to Oceanographic Instruments
    Data Buoy Cooperation Panel 10.3- Guidelines to Oceanographic Instruments i Document Change Record Version Date Originator Change Comments 1.0 7Sep2016 Venkatesan First draft 2.0 29 Oct2017 Venkatesan Revised Draft for Finalization 2.0 DBCP 32 Discussed with members session Review Cycle Version Next Due POC Change Comments 2.0 29 October Chair of Action Group 15 June 2018 2016 R Venkatesan (Chair) Points suggested Dr Florence on specific Luca Centuriani, vocabulary for metrology as per the David Meldrum, document "international metrology K Ramesh (India) vocabulary" (see the website of BIPM). Florence Salvetat Comments : Document is a generic IFREMER Brest document to help people to discover the (France) field and is considered as a first step in and the Secretariat order to homogenize practices. The document is pretty complete on temperature, salinity and quality topics. 17 Nov The Best Practice Discussed with experts 2017 Working Group “Evolving and Sustaining Ocean Best Practices Workshop at UNESCO IOC Paris 15 to 17 Nov 2017 ii Background DBCP 31 session 6.3.8 The Panel agreed that DBCP guidelines on instrument standards ought to be developed. The Panel agreed that the following should initially be undertaken: (i) checking existing materials (e.g. WMO No. 8, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation), (ii) agreeing on the scope of the guidelines document, and the methodology for producing it, and then (iii) proposing a work-plan, and who should contribute. The guidelines document could include instrument classes, and information on traceability requirements, while certification could simply be undertaken at the DBCP level through a committee to be established for that purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation and Cocorahs Data in MO
    Received: 6 August 2017 Accepted: 10 October 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11381 RESEARCH ARTICLE The importance of choosing precipitation datasets Micheal J. Simpson1 | Adam Hirsch2 | Kevin Grempler2 | Anthony Lupo2,3 1 Water Resources Program, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203‐T Abstract ABNR Building, Columbia, MO 65211, USA Precipitation data are important for hydrometeorological analyses, yet there are many ways to 2 Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science measure precipitation. The impact of station density analysed by the current study by comparing Department, School of Natural Resources, measurements from the Missouri Mesonet available via the Missouri Climate Center and Commu- University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, nity Collaborative Rain, Hail, and Snow (CoCoRaHS) measurements archived at the program USA website. The CoCoRaHS data utilize citizen scientists to report precipitation data providing for 3 Department of Natural Resources Management and Land Cadastre, Belgorod much denser data resolution than available through the Mesonet. Although previous research State National Research University, Belgorod, has shown the reliability of CoCoRaHS data, the results here demonstrate important differences 308015, Russia in details of the spatial and temporal distribution of annual precipitation across the state of Correspondence Missouri using the two data sets. Furthermore, differences in the warm and cold season Micheal J. Simpson, University of Missouri, Water Resources Program, School of Natural distributions are presented, some of which may be related to interannual variability such as that Resources, 203‐T ABNR Building, Columbia associated with the El Niño and Southern Oscillation. The contradictory results from two 65211, MO, USA. widely‐used datasets display the importance in properly choosing precipitation data that have Email: [email protected] vastly differing temporal and spatial resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Stereo Disdrometer
    A new technique to measure precipitation in real-time Turfschipper 114 | 2292 JB Wateringen | Tel. 0174 272330 | Fax. 0174 272340 | [email protected] | www.catec.nl DISDROMETER O TERE S 3D - Vectorial particle velocity - Improved particle detection - Detection of snow drift - High accuracy - Maintenance-free - ... THE WORLD OF WEATHER DATA 3D Stereo Disdrometer Actually there was no single Cameras and optics are All particle information is The measurement volume instrument providing all chosen in a way that particles generated from images of is clearly defined with an necessary information to fully inside the measurement extinction. uncertainty of the boarder of characterize precipitation volume can be clearly detected less than 1% of corresponding events. For some events like and are nearly invisible outside Rain rate and velocity-size expansion. This allows us to drift of snow or “vertical” the measurement volume. distribution are calculated predict that the accuracy of rain 3D velocity detection Furthermore filters reduce from the sizes and velocities accumulated precipitation was needed to get correct ambient light to a minimum. A of particles passing the amount is significantly precipitation rates. We use a modern Quadcore processor measurement volume. Sizes increased compared to current stereo camera system directing for embedded applications of the particles are calculated light sheet disdrometers. on a homogenous IR LED is used for image evaluation. from their sizes and position light source. For this reason, With the carefully chosen in the camera images and we built a fully automated components, this set-up their deduced position. The and robust 3D stereo camera measures particles sizes from velocities of particles are system for precipitation 0.16 mm to about 30 mm and calculated from at least two characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Characteristics of Disdrometer-Observed Raindrop
    remote sensing Article Seasonal Characteristics of Disdrometer-Observed Raindrop Size Distributions and Their Applications on Radar Calibration and Erosion Mechanism in a Semi-Arid Area of China Zongxu Xie 1,2, Hanbo Yang 1,2,* , Huafang Lv 1,2 and Qingfang Hu 3 1 Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; [email protected] (Z.X.); [email protected] (H.L.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 3 State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 November 2019; Accepted: 10 January 2020; Published: 12 January 2020 Abstract: Raindrop size distributions (DSDs) are the microphysical characteristics of raindrop spectra. Rainfall characterization is important to: (1) provide information on extreme rate, thus, it has an impact on rainfall related hazard; (2) provide data for indirect observation, model and forecast; (3) calibrate and validate the parameters in radar reflectivity-rainfall intensity (Z-R) relationships (quantitative estimate precipitation, QPE) and the mechanism of precipitation erosivity. In this study, the one-year datasets of raindrop spectra were measured by an OTT Parsivel-2 Disdrometer placed in Yulin, Shaanxi Province, China. At the same time, four TE525MM Gauges were also used in the same location to check the disdrometer-measured rainfall data. The theoretical formula of raindrop kinetic energy-rainfall intensity (KE-R) relationships was derived based on the DSDs to characterize the impact of precipitation characteristics and environmental conditions on KE-R relationships in semi-arid areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Estimation from X-Band Polarimetric Radar And
    Meteorology Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses and Capstone Projects 12-2016 Rainfall Estimation from X-band Polarimetric Radar and Disdrometer Observation Measurements Compared to NEXRAD Measurements: An Application of Rainfall Estimates Brady E. Newkirk Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/mteor_stheses Part of the Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Newkirk, Brady E., "Rainfall Estimation from X-band Polarimetric Radar and Disdrometer Observation Measurements Compared to NEXRAD Measurements: An Application of Rainfall Estimates" (2016). Meteorology Senior Theses. 6. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/mteor_stheses/6 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses and Capstone Projects at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Meteorology Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rainfall Estimation from X-band Polarimetric Radar and Disdrometer Observation Measurements Compared to NEXRAD Measurements: An Application of Rainfall Estimates Brady E. Newkirk Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa James Aanstoos – Mentor Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa ABSTRACT This paper presents the comparison of rainfall estimation from X-band dual-polarization radar observations and NEXRAD observations to that of rain gauge observations. Data collected from three separate studies are used for X-band and rain gauge observations. NEXRAD observations were collected through the NCEI archived data base. Focus on the Kdp parameter for X-band radars was important for higher accuracy of rainfall estimations.
    [Show full text]
  • GPM Ground Validation Duke Soil Moisture Iphex
    Data User Guide GPM Ground Validation Duke Soil Moisture IPHEx Introduction The GPM Ground Validation Duke Soil Moisture dataset consists of a collection of various data obtained during the Integrated Precipitation and Hydrology Experiment (IPHEx) which occurred in the Southern Appalachians, spanning into the Piedmont and Coastal Plain regions of North Carolina from February 27, 2014 through October 17, 2014. The various instruments used included Theta Probes, Infrared Thermometers, 200-A Soil Core Samplers, a Global Positioning System (GPS), Soil Thermometers with Scanning L-band Active Passive (SLAP) flight concurrent survey data, and CS6161 Water Reflectometers. Data are available in a variety of formats based on instrument, including shapefiles, Excel files, Word document files, and ASCII formats. Browse images of site locations and data are available in JPG format. Citation Barros, Ana P., Edward Kim, and Walter A. Petersen. 2018. GPM Ground Validation Duke Soil Moisture IPHEx [indicate subset used]. Dataset available online from the NASA EOSDIS Global Hydrology Resource Center Distributed Active Archive Center, Huntsville, Alabama, U.S.A. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/GPMGV/IPHEX/GAUGES/DATA102 Keywords: NASA, GHRC, IPHEx, North Carolina, Duke, soil moisture, soil samples, theta-probe, infrared thermometer, soil thermometer, water reflectometer, volumetric soil moisture, gravimetric soil moisture, soil density, soil texture, surface roughness, soil porosity Campaign The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Ground Validation (GV) campaign used a variety of methods for validation of GPM satellite constellation measurements prior to and after launch of the GPM Core Satellite, which launched on February 27, 2014. The instrument validation effort included numerous GPM•-specific and joint•-agency/ international external field campaigns, using state of the art cloud and precipitation observational infrastructure (polarimetric radars, profilers, rain gauges, and disdrometers).
    [Show full text]