The Dissolution Implication for of Lithium Minerals in Salt Solutions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Geochemical Journal Vol. 17, pp. 153 to 160, 1983 The dissolution of lithium minerals in salt solutions: Implication for the lithium content of saline waters NOBUKITAKAMATSU,' MASAYUKI IMAHASHI,1 KYOKO SHIMODAIRA' and HIROSHIKAMIYA2 Department of Chemistry, Toho University, Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274,1 and Department of Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466,2 Japan (Received November 10, 1982: Accepted April 22, 1983) Lithium minerals, petalite (Li[AlSi 10]) and lepi to (K2(Li,Al)s -.6[Si6-7A12-1020] (OH,F)4), were reacted with seawater and NaC olutions for 240 hours at 150 to 250°C and with a water/mineral ratio of 25 by weight, to clarify the role of 'ssolved is on the enrichment of lithium in natural saline waters such as coastal thermal waters fossil seawaters. Lithium leachingfrom the minerals was en hanced with increasingsalt concen ation and temper It was proved from the experiments using various salt solutions that NaCIsolution and seawater are effective for the leaching of lithium from rocks and that even the altered seawaters containing low magnesiumhave the ability to extract lithium from rocks. This investigation suggeststhat the non-volcanicsaline waters of hi lithium content (e.g. fossil seawater) can be produced by a long term seawater-rockinteraction at relativelylow temperature without a contribution from the so-called"magmatic emanation". INTRODUCTION MATSUet al., 1980b). The hot springs in Japan have been classified Many papers have been presented on the into 4 types by SAKAIand. MATSUBAYA(1974) lithium content of natural waters. WHITE from the hydrogen and oxygen isotopic ratio (1957) suggested that among the natural surface of the spring waters: Arima type, Greentuff waters volcanic NaCI type waters are most type, coastal and volcanic thermal waters. In enriched in lithium and it may be used as al general, the waters except volanic thermal very significant criterion to distinguish natural waters have high salinity. Arima and Greentuff waters of volcanic origin. On the other hand, type thermal waters which are flowing out from ELLIS and MAHON(1964) suggested that the Neogene or pre-Neogene formations show high composition of volcanic thermal water could lithium contents and have high Li/I:' ratios. be explained by high temperature reaction of On the other hand, in coastal thermal waters water with rocks, and do not require contribu which are heated by conduction from the tion from a "magmatic" fluid rich in the typical Quarternary volcanic rocks, these values are low. hydrothermal phase elements such as Li, As, B, The chemical composition of NaCl type etc. ICHIKUNIet al. (1974) suggested that even waters originated from present or fossil seawater the cold pore waters in sediments can be may be affected by one or some of the following changed into waters with Li/Na and K/Na ratios mechanisms during their ascent to the surface resembling geothermal waters if the waters are (NADLERet al., 1980): 1) reactions with rocks, maintained under certain conditions. In fact, 2) evaporation and precipitation of salts and some non volcanic NaCl type waters in Japan 3) ultrafiltration. The first mechanism would are of the same order of magnitude as those be most significant for solutions of shallow of volcanic NaCI type waters, e.g., Kashio, Tw = coastal aquifers in which evaporation and ultra 11.0°C, Li = 80ppm, Li/Na = 5.7 X 10-3 (TAKA filtration can not take place. It is known that 153 154 N. TAKAMATSU et al. even the coastal thermal waters, that may be Table 1. The chemical composition and the surface area derived by short term seawater-rock interaction, of the lithium minerals contain more lithium than does seawater (TAKA Petalite Lepidolite MATSUet al., 1980b). This indicates that lithium H20 0.23 0.08 in waters may be derived from rocks by reaction H20(+) 1.73 0.90 Si02 75.58 56.40 with seawater and that the lithium content of A1203 15.92 24.02 non-volcanic NaCI type water may prove to be a F e2 03 0.02 0.12 CaO 0.38 good criterion for the degree of seawater-rock MgO 0.15 interaction. Lie 0 3.38 3.46 Lithium minerals were reacted with salt Nat 0 1.54 0.71 K20 0.60 8.98 solutions and seawater, to examine whether the MnO 0.00 0.28 lithium in the NaCI type waters could be derived F 3.68 from rocks by the reaction with the salt solu Total 99.53(%) 98.63(%) tions such as seawater. Surface area 4.0(m2/g) 5.1 (m2/g) : Not determined. EXPERIMENTAL Most igneous and sedimentary rocks have ture. The pressure effect on the dissolution of lithium concentrations in a restricted range of lithium was ignored in the experiments because 10-70ppm (HEIER and BILLINGS, 1969). How the effect is considered to be small. ever, the lithium concentrations of rocks are Resulting solutions were filtered through too low to determine the lithium concentration 0.45µm cellulose membrane filters and the pH of the solutions in the dissolution experiments. was measured immediately. The lithium, So lithium minerals, petalite and lepidolite, were potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium con used as our starting materials. tents of the filtrates were determined by atomic Petalite (Southwest of Africa) and lepidolite absorption spectrophotometry. The chloride (South-Dakota, U.S.A.) were purchased from and sulfate ions were determined by ion the Iwamoto Mineral Compnay, Tokyo. They chromatography. We did not analyze the solid were crushed to under 200 mesh for the use in reaction products. Therefore, we will not dis the experiments. Their chemical compositions cuss the alteration products in this paper. are given in Table 1. Reagent grade NaCI was dissolved in distilled water to prepare 0.01, 0.1 RESULTS and 0.555M NaCI solutions. Natural seawater used for the experiments was collected off Dissolution in NaC1 solutions Figure 1 Torishima Island, Tokyo and passed through a shows the amounts of lithium leached from 0.45µm cellulose membrane filter. petalite and lepidolite by NaCI solutions. The The lithium minerals were reacted with NaCl lithium concentrations in 0.555M NaCl solution solutions and seawater (or diluted seawater) at during the reaction with petalite at 150, 200 and moderate temperature (150, 200 and 250°C) 250°C are shown in Fig. 2. The dissolution rate and at a water/mineral ratio of 25 by weight. In of lithium increased with increasing NaCI con order to elucidate the role of cations in the dis centration and with temperature. The pH of the solution of lithium, petalite was reacted with resulting solutions became slightly low with 0.1 M solution of NaCI, KCI, RbCI and CsC1each increasing NaCI concentration and temperature. at 200° C. The experiments were carried out in a The effect of NaCl on the dissolution of lithium shaking type autoclave using a reaction vessel from petalite was larger than that from lepido made of titanium alloy. Pressure was main lite (Figs. 1 and 3). At low temperature (40 tained at the vapor pressure at given tempera 90'C), however, the effect of NaCl on the Dissolution of Li minerals 155 ._50 rn E %-40 30 20 10 6 18 30 66 150 Time(hr) 240 Fig. 1. Li concentrationsin salt solutionsduring reactionwith petalite and lepidoliteat 200°C and water/rock ratio of 25. Petalite: 0.555M NaCI (•), 0.1M NaCI (0), 0.01M NaCI (.) and H20 (p). Lepidolite: 0.1M NaCI (A), (Lx). H20 (Lx). dissolution of lithium from petalite was smaller Dissolution in seawater and diluted sea than that from lepidolite (TAKAMATSUet al., water Table 2 shows. the concentrations of 1976). This may be due to the structural dif lithium, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride ference between lepidolite and petalite; phil and sulfate ions found in seawater and the losilicate and tectosilicate. The rate of release diluted seawater adjusted to 0.1 and 0.01M of lithium from lepidolite into the solution may chloride concentration which reacted with reflect the rate at which the interlayer cations petalite. The pH of the reacted solutions are removed and that from petalite may reflect decreased with increasing Cl concentration and the rate of attack on the tetrahedral frame with the progress of reaction (Table 2). works. Dissolution rate constants in salt solutions 100[ ~-. .~ Fromthe experimentalresults, the dissolution of lithium minerals are considered to be in congruent. Many studies have been reported on the incongruent dissolution kinetics of feld rnE XJI~~ thesparhypotheses and mica. onPETROVicthe dissolution et al. (1976)kinetics.reviewed The -50 hypotheses involve surface reaction and diffu sion through amorphous precipitates, crystal line precipitates and leached layer. The ojbect of this study, however, is not to discuss the dissolution mechanism. We calculated an ap 0 6 30 66 150 240 propriate rate constant of lithium dissolution Time (hr) in all the experiments to know the effect of Fig. 2. Li concentrations in 0.555M NaCI solution dur temperature and salt concentration on the ing reaction with petalite at 250 (0), 200 (o) and 150 dissolution of the lithium minerals. An ion (o)°Cc exchange equilibrium will be established, when 156 N. TAKAMATSU et al. Table 2. The pH and the concentrations of Li, Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cl and SO4 found from the experiments of petalite and seawater and diluted seawater (adjusted to 0.1 and 0.01M chloride concentration) Time pH Li Na K Ca Mg C1 S04 (hr) (mg/1) Start 6.72 0.00 195 7.33 7.50 23.8 353 49.0 6 6.87 6.90 206 26.8 3.78 1.08 357 48.8 30 7.03 11.0 196 23.4 2.09 0.23 357 48.7 0.01 M C1 42 6.99 12.1 195 23.1 1.93 0.17 357 48.7 66 7.14 12.8 196 22.9 1.68 0.07 353 49.5 150 7.06 15.8 197 20.7 1.55 0.16 354 48.0 240 7.24 18.3 198 18.6 1.48 0.11 353 47.5 Start 7.38 0.02 1,950 73.3 75.0 238 3,530 490 6 5.47 9.00 1,940 105 84.5 198 3,600 513 30 4.61 18.1 1,950 107 51.1 171 3,540 0.1 M C1 42 5.10 21.1 1,940 105 53.6 175 3,520 413 66 4.55 23.2 1,970 103 47.5 161 3,530 393 150 4.74 29.2 1,960 110 46.0 157 3,530 390 240 4.33 33.8 1,970 112 40.7 145 3,540 364 S tart 8.21 0.15 10,800 407 416 1,320 19,700 2,720 6 5.20 10.6 10,800 450 173 1,400 19,800 2,170 30 4.57 20.2 445 205 1,220 Seawater 42 4.01 22.0 10,900 437 160.