Network Analysis, History of Philipp Korom, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Network Analysis, History of Philipp Korom, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany Network Analysis, History of Philipp Korom, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Abstract While social scientists had been drawing on the abstract idea of social networks clearly since the nineteenth century, which becomes most evident in Georg Simmel’s formal sociology, a social network analysis (SNA) grounded in computational models and graphic imagery emerged within the field of small group research in the 1930s. It was Jacob Moreno who introduced the idea of depicting social structure as a network diagram (‘sociometry’). Kurt Lewin was an early contributor to the promotion of mathematical models of group relations, and Fritz Heider focused on triads to theorize on what throws groups out of balance. Mostly independent of these ideas, the anthropologist Lloyd Warner adopted a network approach in the study of informal relations between workers and of communities. SNA was further applied by the Manchester school of anthropologists to enhance ethnographic description. Advancing mathematical-formal aspects of SNA at Harvard in the 1970s, Harrison C. White and his collaborators contributed to the establishment of the discipline as a recognized paradigm. In the late 1990s, physicists began to publish work on social networks. Today, SNA has become a multidisciplinary research specialty with distinct theoretical concepts and data-analytic techniques. The Origins of Social Network Ideas suggested that a consideration of social dynamics caused by the simple addition of a third person could provide insights on Social structure has been one of the early key concepts in the society at large, that is, how large structures constrain individ- social sciences. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a recently uals. While isolated dyads are characterized by individuality and developed set of formal methods for the study of social struc- intimacy, triads have a superindividual property: (informal) tures that draws on graph theory in which individuals and social pressures are activated, and the variance of behavior as other social actors, such as groups and organizations, are rep- well as interpersonal idiosyncrasies are reduced. Third-party resented by points and their social relations are represented by effects may also involve two actors forming a coalition against lines. The main theoretical underpinning of SNA is, as Wellman a third, one actor disturbing the alliance between two others, or (1988) pointed out, that the structure of relations among actors one actor even taking advantage of a conflict between two others and the location of individual actors in the network have (‘rejoicing third’). It was Simmel’s student Leopold von Wiese important attitudinal, behavioral, and perceptual conse- (1876–1969) who adopted a contemporary terminology of quences both for individuals and the social structure as points, lines, and connections to describe social relations a whole. Visual imagery has played a significant role in SNA (von Wiese, 1924/1932). since its inception. Mathematical and computational models The origins of structural research are, however, also located are at the base of more current applications. outside the disciplinary boundaries of sociology. Especially the Only in the first part of the twentieth century did a handful work of scholars in educational and developmental of social scientists begin to systematically theorize social rela- psychology, who were interested in the ways small-group tionships. Society as a whole was conceptualized as the very structures affected individual perceptions and actions had tissue of relations. Ferdinand Tönnies (1855–1936) categorized a structuralist flavor very early. Helen Bott, for example, set out social ties as being either personal and direct (‘community’) or to document every form of social interaction that occurred formal and instrumental (‘society’). Herbert Spencer (1820– among preschool children (Bott, 1928). In fact, she was one of 1903) made a similar distinction between premodern and the first to collect ego-centered kinship network data and modern societies by referring to ‘ordinary’ and ‘secondary rela- calculate even network density measures. It is, however, tions.’ Emile Durkheim (1858–1917) theorized the specific commonly agreed that Jacob Moreno, a student of psychiatry structuring of groups as being responsible for the quality of from Vienna who immigrated to the United States in 1925 and emergent laws and morality, and Gustav Le Bon (1841–1931) championed the field of ‘sociometry,’ was the main driving was the first to examine the phenomenon of crowd behavior. It force, together with his collaborator, Helen Jennings, in was, however, Georg Simmel (1858–1918), a German sociol- establishing SNA. ogist whose work stood out against macrolevel theories of Moreno was deeply influenced by Gestalt psychology scholars such as Max Weber (1864–1920) and Karl Marx (Gestalt translates as ‘form’) developed by mostly German (1818–83), who pioneered most explicitly the analysis of dyads psychologists such as Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), Max Wer- (relationships between two persons) and triads (groups theimer (1880–1943), and Wolfgang Köhler (1887–1967) as composed of three people) as building blocks of social life. a protest against behaviorist theories of their day. This school of Although he never used the term ‘social network’ as such, his thought maintained that innate and self-organizing operations ideas about microlevel structures prove to be a source of of the brain influence the way we see. With respect to the visual inspiration even for current day SNA. Simmel held the view that recognition of figures, we tend to perceive, for example, whole sociology was no more and no less than the study of inter- forms instead of just a collection of lines and curves. Moreno weaving actions in social encounters (Simmel, 1908/2009). He transferred the idea that ‘the whole is greater than the sum of its 524 International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03226-8 Network Analysis, History of 525 parts’ to the interplay between the social embeddedness of an the three (focal individual P, another agent O, object X) can individual and this person’s well-being. He believed that many only exist, if the algebraic multiplication of signs in the triad psychological problems stemmed from failed interactions and relation has a positive value. With three sets of possible rela- that the position of individuals within groups is highly signif- tionships, each taking one of two values ( , ), eight possible þ À icant for their mental health; Moreno and Jennings (1938) thus states exist. A triad is harmonious, for example, if there are two spoke of ‘psychosocial networks.’ Moreno’s concern with social negative and one positive relation (e.g., , , ): “I don’t like À þ À structure is mirrored in therapy forms called ‘sociodrama’ and person B. B has a dog. I don’t like the dog either.” One of ‘psychodrama,’ which aimed at exploring conflicts inherent in Heider’s propositions is that individuals tend to choose states social roles. ‘Sociometry’ was developed as a powerful tool for of balance in their interpersonal relations, which is why the assessing group dynamics and eliciting graphically subjective adages ‘your friends are my friends’ or ‘the enemy of my enemy feelings between persons. Figure 1 illustrates typical ‘socio- is my friend’ adequately summarize core implications of social grams’ featured in the book Who Shall Survive? (Moreno, 1934), balance theory. Building on Lewin’s work, Cartwright and in which Moreno (and Jennings) probed the causes of Harrary translated Heider’s diagrams into graph theory and runaways at the Hudson School for Girls in upstate New York. covered more than triadic relationships by asking the following The crux of their argument was that the location in the social question: What pattern would the interpersonal relations of networks primarily determined whether and when someone a group of individuals have if they were balanced? Important ran away. among their findings is the ‘structure theorem’ that “an s-graph At first, Moreno’s idea to make social structure tangible [signed graph] is balanced if and only if its points can be garnered a great deal of interest, although this turned out to be separated into two mutually exclusive subsets such that each short-lived. By the 1940s, American social scientists had positive line joins two points of the same subset and each returned to their focus on the characteristics of individuals negative line joins points from different subsets” (Cartwright (Freeman, 2004). and Harary, 1956: p. 286; Figure 2). Subsequently, Davis In the 1940s and 1950s, research on social networks (1967) generalized balance to clusterability, which allows advanced on more than one front, mostly independently of any number of clusters such that positive arcs appear within each other. In fact, SNA can be seen as emerging from certain clusters and negative arcs between clusters. Davis and Leinhardt disciplinary trajectories (Prell, 2012), even if scholars working (1972) further extended balance theory by including status, in the field of SNA always crossed disciplines. In the following, which was motivated by the fact that people not only cluster the developmental pathways of SNA are outlined in the key into groups but also adhere to social rankings. They show how disciplines of psychology, sociology, and social anthropology. directed sentiment
Recommended publications
  • Structural Balance and Partitioning Signed Graphs
    Structural Balance and Partitioning Signed Graphs Patrick Doreian Andrej Mrvar Department of Sociology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Pittsburgh University of Ljubljana Abstract Signed graphs have been used frequently to model affect ties for social actors. In this context, structural balance theory has been used as a theory for the organization and form of these relations. Based on a graph theoretical formalization of this theory, for signed graphs, there are theorems stating that balanced structures have clear parti- tioned forms. We discuss the use of local optimization procedures as a method of obtaining these partitioned structures – or partitioned structures that are as close to a balanced partition as possible for structures that are not balanced. In addition, this method provides a measure of the extent to which a signed graph is imbalanced. For a time series of signed graphs, this permits a test of the balance hypoth- esis that human groups tend towards balance over time. Examples are provided of interpersonal ties in networks and institutionalized rela- tions among collective units. Since the pioneering work of Heider (1946) there has been an enduring concern with theories of structural balance. See, for example, Taylor (1970) and Forsythe (1990). Central to this formulation is the idea of triads made up of two actors, p and q, and some object, x. There is a direct social relation between the two actors and there are unit formation links between the actors and the object. The set of such triads is displayed in Figure 1. The relation between the actors can be positive (for example, liking) or negative (disliking) and the unit formation relations can be positive (for example, approve) or negative (disapprove).
    [Show full text]
  • Balance and Fragmentation in Societies with Homophily and Social Balance Tuan M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Balance and fragmentation in societies with homophily and social balance Tuan M. Pham1,2, Andrew C. Alexander3, Jan Korbel1,2, Rudolf Hanel1,2 & Stefan Thurner1,2,4* Recent attempts to understand the origin of social fragmentation on the basis of spin models include terms accounting for two social phenomena: homophily—the tendency for people with similar opinions to establish positive relations—and social balance—the tendency for people to establish balanced triadic relations. Spins represent attribute vectors that encode G diferent opinions of individuals whose social interactions can be positive or negative. Here we present a co-evolutionary Hamiltonian model of societies where people minimise their individual social stresses. We show that societies always reach stationary, balanced, and fragmented states, if—in addition to homophily— individuals take into account a signifcant fraction, q, of their triadic relations. Above a critical value, qc , balanced and fragmented states exist for any number of opinions. Te concept of so-called flter bubbles captures the fragmentation of society into isolated groups of people who trust each other, but clearly distinguish themselves from “other”. Opinions tend to align within groups and diverge between them. Interest in this process of social disintegration, started by Durkheim 1, has experienced a recent boost, fuelled by the availability of modern communication technologies. Te extent to which societies fragment depends largely on the interplay of two basic mechanisms that drive social interactions: homophily and structural balance. Homophily is the “principle” that “similarity breeds connection”2. In particular, for those individuals who can be characterised by some social traits, such as opinions on a range of issues, homophily appears as the tendency of like-minded individuals to become friends 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Positive and Negative Relationships
    From the book Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. By David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Complete preprint on-line at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/ Chapter 5 Positive and Negative Relationships In our discussion of networks thus far, we have generally viewed the relationships con- tained in these networks as having positive connotations — links have typically indicated such things as friendship, collaboration, sharing of information, or membership in a group. The terminology of on-line social networks reflects a largely similar view, through its em- phasis on the connections one forms with friends, fans, followers, and so forth. But in most network settings, there are also negative effects at work. Some relations are friendly, but others are antagonistic or hostile; interactions between people or groups are regularly beset by controversy, disagreement, and sometimes outright conflict. How should we reason about the mix of positive and negative relationships that take place within a network? Here we describe a rich part of social network theory that involves taking a network and annotating its links (i.e., its edges) with positive and negative signs. Positive links represent friendship while negative links represent antagonism, and an important problem in the study of social networks is to understand the tension between these two forces. The notion of structural balance that we discuss in this chapter is one of the basic frameworks for doing this. In addition to introducing some of the basics of structural balance, our discussion here serves a second, methodological purpose: it illustrates a nice connection between local and global network properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Positive and Negative Relationships
    Chapter 5 Positive and Negative Relationships Often, knowing just the nodes and edges of a network is not enough to understand the full picture — in many settings, we need to annotate these nodes and edges with additional information to capture what’s going on. This is a theme that has come up several times in our discussions already: for example, Granovetter’s work on the strength of weak ties is based on designating links in a social network as strong or weak, and empirical analyses of social networks that evolve over time is based on annotating edges with the periods during which they were “alive.” Here we describe a rich part of social network theory that involves annotating edges with positive and negative signs — to convey the idea that certain edges represent friendship, while other edges represent antagonism. Indeed, an important problem in social networks is to understand the tension between these two forces, and the notion of structural balance that we discuss is one of the basic frameworks for doing this. In addition to introducing some of the basics of structural balance, our discussion here serves a second, methodological purpose: it illustrates a nice connection between local and global network properties. A recurring issue in the analysis of networked systems is the way in which local effects — phenomena involving only a few nodes at a time — can have global consequences that are observable at the level of the network as a whole. Structural balance offers a way to capture one such relationship in a very clean way, and by purely mathematical analysis: we will consider a simple definition abstractly, and find that it inevitably leads to certain macroscopic properties of the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Balance in Signed Networks: Separating the Probability to Interact from the Tendency to Fight∗
    Structural Balance in Signed Networks: Separating the Probability to Interact from the Tendency to Fight∗ J¨urgenLernery Abstract Structural balance theory implies hypothetical network effects such as \the enemy of an enemy is a friend" or \the friend of an enemy is an enemy." To statistically test such hypotheses researchers often estimate whether, for instance, actors have an increased probability to collaborate with the enemies of their enemies and/or a decreased probability to fight the enemies of their enemies. Empirically it turns out that the support for balance theory from these tests is mixed at best. We argue that such results are not necessarily a contradiction to balance theory but that they could also be explained by other network effects that influence the probability to interact at all. We propose new and better interpretable models to assess structural balance in signed networks and illustrate their usefulness with networks of international alliances and conflicts. With the new operationalization the support for balance theory in international relations networks is much stronger than suggested by previous work. Keywords: signed networks, structural balance theory, international re- lations, conditional sign of interaction 1 Introduction Generalizing Heider's theory of cognitive balance (Heider 1946), Cartwright and Harary (1956) called a signed network structurally balanced if every cycle has an even number of negative ties. They proved that a network is balanced if and only if its actors can be divided into two groups with only positive ties within the groups and only negative ties between groups. The fundamental claim of structural balance theory is that actors have a preference for balanced states and if a network is unbalanced then actors have a tendency to increase balance by adapting their ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Balance in Signed Digraphs: Considering Transitivity to Measure Balance in Graphs Constructed by Using Different Link Signing Methods
    Structural balance in signed digraphs: considering transitivity to measure balance in graphs constructed by using different link signing methods Ly Dinh*, Rezvaneh Rezapour*, Lan Jiang, Jana Diesner University of Illinois at Urbana{Champaign * These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract Structural balance theory assumes triads in networks to gravitate towards stable configurations. The theory has been verified for undirected graphs. Since real-world networks are often directed, we introduce a novel method for considering both transitivity and sign consistency for calculating balance in signed digraphs. We test our approach on graphs that we constructed by using different methods for identifying edge signs: natural language process- ing to infer signs from underlying text data, and self-reported survey data. Our results show that for various social contexts and edge sign detection methods, balance is moderately high, ranging from 67.5% to 92.4%. Keywords: Structural balance, Transitivity, Signed digraphs, Natural language processing, Communication networks, Organizational networks 1. Introduction Real-world social and communication networks are composed of complex arXiv:2006.02565v1 [cs.SI] 3 Jun 2020 and continually evolving interactions among social agents. Network scholars have examined core principles that explains patterns of social interactions at various levels of analysis, i.e., at the node level [4], dyadic level [3], triadic level [5, 30], subgroup level [44], and the graph level [31]. Each level of analysis enables different types of hypotheses to be tested, e.g., with respect Email address: {dinh4,rezapou2,lanj3,jdiesner}@illinois.edu (Ly Dinh*, Rezvaneh Rezapour*, Lan Jiang, Jana Diesner) to structural properties, such as reciprocity at the dyad level, transitivity at the triad level, clusterability at the subgroup level, and centralization at the network level [54, 35].
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Approach for Quantifying Node Centrality in Signed and Directed Social Networks Wei-Chung Liu1 , Liang-Cheng Huang1, Chester Wai-Jen Liu2 and Ferenc Jordán3*
    Liu et al. Applied Network Science (2020) 5:46 Applied Network Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00288-w RESEARCH Open Access A simple approach for quantifying node centrality in signed and directed social networks Wei-Chung Liu1 , Liang-Cheng Huang1, Chester Wai-Jen Liu2 and Ferenc Jordán3* * Correspondence: jordan.ferenc@ gmail.com Abstract 3Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, The position of a node in a social network, or node centrality, can be quantified in Klebelsberg Kuno, Tihany 3, 8237, several ways. Traditionally, it can be defined by considering the local connectivity of Hungary a node (degree) and some non-local characteristics (distance). Here, we present an Full list of author information is available at the end of the article approach that can quantify the interaction structure of signed digraphs and we define a node centrality measure for these networks. The basic principle behind our approach is to determine the sign and strength of direct and indirect effects of one node on another along pathways. Such an approach allows us to elucidate how a node is structurally connected to other nodes in the social network, and partition its interaction structure into positive and negative components. Centrality here is quantified in two ways providing complementary information: total effect is the overall effect a node has on all nodes in the same social network; while net effect describes, whether predominately positive or negative, the manner in which a node can exert on the social network. We use Sampson’s like-dislike relation network to demonstrate our approach and compare our result to those derived from existing centrality indices.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Balance in the Social Networks of a Wild Mammal
    Animal Behaviour 85 (2013) 1397e1405 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Structural balance in the social networks of a wild mammal Amiyaal Ilany a,b,*, Adi Barocas a,c, Lee Koren d, Michael Kam e, Eli Geffen a a Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Israel b National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Knoxville, TN, U.S.A. c Department of Zoology and Physiology and Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, U.S.A. d The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel e Desert Animal Adaptations and Husbandry, Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel article info The social structure of a population is based on individual social associations, which can be described fi Article history: using network patterns (motifs). Our understanding of the forces stabilizing speci c social structures in Received 6 December 2012 animals is limited. Structural balance theory was proposed for exploring social alliances and suggested Initial acceptance 2 January 2013 that some network motifs are more stable than others in a society. The theory models the presence of Final acceptance 6 March 2013 specific triads in the network and their effect on the global population structure, based on the differential Available online 21 April 2013 stability of specific triad configurations. While structural balance was shown in human social networks, MS. number: A12-00922R2 the theory has never been tested in animal societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis and Its Applications in Agriculture
    Popular Article www.vigyanvarta.com Vol-1 Issue-6 Naresh and Tamta (2020) Social Network Analysis and its Applications in Agriculture Naresh Kumar. B1 and Meenakshi Tamta2 1Ph.D Scholar, Department of Extension Education, PAU, Ludhiana, Punjab 2Ph.D Scholar, Department of Apparel and Textile Science, PAU, Ludhiana, Punjab Corresponding Author Naresh Kumar. B Email: [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Keywords Social network analysis, nodes, ties, adjacency matrix, Sociomatrix and SNA tools. How to cite this article: Naresh Kumar, B. and Tamta, M. 2020. Social Network Analysis and its Applications in Agriculture. Vigyan Varta 1(6): 23-27. ABSTRACT Social network analysis is a connection between individuals or institutes or organizations which are connected through vertex (nodes) and edges (ties). Vertexes are the individual actors within the networks, and edges are the relationships between the actors. Social network analysis is a graphical representation of the relationship. SNA with its wide range of utility has evolved with applications in various disciplines. some important terminology used in social network analysis were nodes, ties, network, multiplex networks, weighted ties, geodesic distance, degree centrality, betweenness centrality, Eigenvector centrality and closeness centrality. Social network analysis mainly two types, edge list data and Sociomatrix (also known as an Adjacency Matrix). Social network analysis has a wide range of application in Social sciences, adoption studies, monitoring and impact assessment and value chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Large Balanced Subgraphs in Signed Networks
    Finding large balanced subgraphs in signed networks Bruno Ordozgoiti Antonis Matakos Aristides Gionis∗ Aalto University Aalto University KTH Royal Institute of Technology [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Signed networks are graphs whose edges are labelled with either a + + - - + + - - positive or a negative sign, and can be used to capture nuances in interactions that are missed by their unsigned counterparts. The + + - - concept of balance in signed graph theory determines whether a network can be partitioned into two perfectly opposing subsets, and Figure 1: The four possible signed triangles. The two on the is therefore useful for modelling phenomena such as the existence left are balanced, while the two on the right are not. of polarized communities in social networks. While determining whether a graph is balanced is easy, finding a large balanced sub- Many social-media platforms can be represented by graphs. Thus, graph is hard. The few heuristics available in the literature for this graph theory has found a variety of applications in this domain purpose are either ineffective or non-scalable. In this paper we over the last few decades, such as community detection [13], parti- propose an efficient algorithm for finding large balanced subgraphs tioning [4], and recommendation [30]. One limitation of the graph in signed networks. The algorithm relies on signed spectral theory representations usually employed in the literature is that they can and a novel bound for perturbations of the graph Laplacian. In capture the existence, or even the strength, of connections between a wide variety of experiments on real-world data we show that vertices, but not their disposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Spillover Priming Effects from a Network Perspective
    COME A LITTLE CLOSER: EXAMINING SPILLOVER PRIMING EFFECTS FROM A NETWORK PERSPECTIVE David Thomas Morin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2013 Committee: Gi Woong Yun, Ph.D., Advisor Mary M. Murray, Ed.D. Graduate Faculty Representative Sung-Yeon Park, Ph.D. Srinivas Melkote, Ph.D. ii © 2013 David Thomas Morin All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Gi Woong Yun, Advisor Priming theory has been well researched within the field of media studies. Since the late 1980s, priming theory has been used to explain a host of media effects related phenomena. Although priming is one of the most robust theories in media studies, scant research has been paid to spillover/indirect priming effects. Traditional media priming studies examine how primes affect individual evaluations of presidents, but none to date have attempted to examine how individuals perceive little-known political officials via strong or weak ties to a president. To address this glaring gap in the literature, a 3X2 online experiment, manipulating prime valence and tie strength, was conducted. More specifically, a news transcript was manipulated to portray the educational issue, Race to the Top, in either a positive, negative, or neutral tone, with President Obama being portrayed as responsible for the issue. A newspaper article was manipulated to portray a fictional congressional candidate named Steve Easterly as either strongly or weakly tied to President Obama. After exposure to the primes, participants were asked to answer a series of items measuring attitude evaluations and voting intent towards both President Obama and Steve Easterly in a post-test questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • A Balance Theory Analysis Including the Noncustodial Parent As a Member of the Family System
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-1984 Stepfamily adjustment: a balance theory analysis including the noncustodial parent as a member of the family system Margaret L. Fujita Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fujita, Margaret L., "Stepfamily adjustment: a balance theory analysis including the noncustodial parent as a member of the family system" (1984). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 376. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.376 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. STEPFAMILY ADJUSTMENT: A BALANCE THEORY ANALYSIS INCLUDING THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT AS A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY SYSTEM by MARGARET L. FUJITA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in URBAN STUDIES Portland State University <S) 1984 Margaret L. Fujita TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Margaret L. Fujita presented August 7, 1984. Dr. Nancys. Chapman;airman Dr. Leonard D. iain Dr. Da vlL :::::: I . )~ APPROVED: Kenneth J. Dueker, Acting Dean, School of Urban and Publlc Affalrs Jim F. Ch AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Margaret L. Fujita for the Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Studies presented August 7, 1984. Title: Stepfamily Adjustment: A Balance Theory Analysis Including the Noncustodial Parent as a Member of the Family System.
    [Show full text]