DOCSLIB.ORG

JLENS Unit Uncases Colors See PARKING, Page 14 Arrival of Alpha Battery, 3Rd Air Defense Artillary Made Official

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JLENS Unit Uncases Colors See PARKING, Page 14 Arrival of Alpha Battery, 3Rd Air Defense Artillary Made Official AAPGPublishedP in the interestG of the people of AberdeenNNEWS Proving Ground,E MarylandWS www.TeamAPG.com THURSDAY, AUGUST 21, 2014 Vol. 58, No. 33 DES to increase handicap parking enforcement By YVONNE JOHNSON APG News The Direc- torate of Emergency Services (DES) will begin an Enhanced Handicap Park- ing Enforce- Photo by Sean Kief ment Campaign Capt. Gilberto Malave, battery commander, Alpha Battery, 3rd Air Defense Artillery (JLENS) and his Soldiers stand at starting Mon- parade rest with the unit’s freshly uncased colors during the Guidon Uncasing Ceremony at the APG North (Aberdeen) day, Aug. 25. recreation center Aug. 18. Recently stood up at APG, the battery will launch aerostats – blimps – that are capable of According to Lt. Joseph Davis, detecting unfriendly missiles and rockets up to 340 miles away in its mission to protect the national capital region. DES traffic division, frequent inci- dents of parking misuse occur post wide and patrols will be stepped up to catch violators, particularly in JLENS unit uncases colors See PARKING, page 14 Arrival of Alpha Battery, 3rd Air Defense Artillary made official By YVONNE JOHNSON as a football field, will carry powerful unit at APG. Assisting was Col. James P. APG APG News radars capable of detecting, tracking and Payne, commander of the 30th ADA Bri- The arrival of Alpha Battery, 3rd Air targeting missiles and rockets up to 340 gade and 30th ADA Brigade Command Defense Artillery (ADA) was made offi- miles away. Aerostats have been deployed Sgt. Maj. Thomas L. Eagan. News staff cial, Aug. 18, during the unit’s Guidon in Iraq and Afghanistan, but this is JLENS’ Guests included Maj. Gen. Glen A. Uncasing Ceremony at the APG North first use in the mainland United States; Bramhall, commander of the 263rd Army (Aberdeen) recreation center. though other blimps have been used and Air and Missile Defense Command and welcomes The Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile tested around the nation. 263rd AAMDC Command Sgt. Maj. Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System, Lt. Col. Charles L. Matallana, 2-6 ADA James J. Wilbanks; Gary Martin, deputy or JLENS is a system of two aerostats battalion commander and 2-6 ADA Com- to APG Senior Leader and commander of new editor (blimps), or tethered airships, that float mand Sgt. Maj. Kevin K. Enoch uncased the U.S. Army Communications-Electron- 10,000 feet in the air. Each, nearly as long the unit colors officially establishing the See JLENS, page 14 Staff report Amanda R. Rominiecki became the Garrison hosts quarterly town hall new editor of the APG News Aug. 11. By RACHEL PONDER Common Level of Support (CLS) services. In the next Prior to APG News few months, leadership will determine the garrison’s joining the Garrison Soldiers, civilians and contractors core requirements and capabilities. Garrison Pub- received the latest updates from post leaders “Everyone in this rrom will be impacted in some way,” he said. lic Affairs Rominiecki during the quarterly Garrison Town Hall meet- Office Romi- ing at the post theater Aug. 19. McClinton also discussed restructuring the niecki was a public affairs spe- APG Garrison Commander Col. Gregory workforce. Currently the garrison workforce has an excess of 100 over-higher positions. He said cialist with the U.S. Army McClinton addressed budget concerns as the leaders must address the issue of “over-hires.” Communications-Electronics, government approaches a new fiscal year Oct. Research, Development and One tool to reduce the number of over-highers 1. He said that the U.S. Army Installation Man- is through Voluntary Early Retirement Authori- Engineering Center (CERDEC) agement Command’s funding levels for FY 2015 at APG. ty/ Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VERA/ are expected to remain the same as FY 2014. VISP). He said the goal is to balance the TDA by match- Rominiecki was born in Ohio Changes are anticipated, however, at the IMCOM and grew up outside of Chica- ing those classified as “over-hires” to current vacancies. and garrison levels as IMCOM Commander Lt. Gen. David He advised employees to talk with their supervisors to go. Her parents were originally Halverson is looking at ways to realign the supporting force. from Delaware and she attended determine their status. “Since IMCOM stood up, we have taken on responsibilities that McClinton and Garrison Command Sgt. Maj. Jeffrey Adams the University of Delaware, her are not part of our core competencies,” McClinton said. See NEW, page 14 He said that as a result, some garrisons are failing to deliver their See GARRISON, page 14 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Plan for extra travel time at Rt. 22 gate APG motorists and bicyclists should plan for extra travel time to and from the installation during construction that will expand the roadways outside of the Rt. 22 gate to three-way lanes for incoming and outgoing traffic. Drivers should exercise caution as they drive through the work zone. The Maryland State Highway Administration reminds bicyclists and motorists that they are prohibited from riding on any shoulder, lane or ramp within a highway work zone that is closed off with cones, barrels or concrete barriers. Persons operating bicycles, mopeds or motor scooters on public bicycle areas have the same rights and duties as motorists and must obey all traffic control devices. Motorists should pass bicyclists safely at a dis- tance of not less than three feet. Photo by Molly Blosse ONLINE INDEX IN THIS ISSUE WEATHER www.TeamAPG.com/ Pg 2 .................. Street Talk APGNews Pg 6 ........... At Your Service Thursday facebook.com/ APGMd Pg 12.....................Crossword twitter.com/ Pg 10.....Mark Your Calendar PM T-Storms chance of rain 50% USAGAPG Pg 11........APG News History flickr.com/photos/ Pg 14.............Did You Know? usagapg/ ICE system http://ice.disa.mil/ Facebook, http://on.fb.me/HzQIow More inside APG South DES to close PAGE 3 Change of responsibility at Back-to-School: Immunizations, Army hackers help protect network PAGE 4 ATEC AEC Safety, HCPS Open Houses ARL Colloboration Commons to spur ideas PAGE 12 APG Police complete ALS Ice Bucket Challenge PAGE 15 Page 4 Pages 8-9 83° 68° 2 APG News • August 21, 2014 LEGALLY SPEAKING What is/was your OSJA client division favorite subject in school? offers variety of services By SANDI WILLIAMS tance to Service Members returning from has been willfully damaged or wrongfully “My two favorite OSJA combat zones and contingency operations taken. Claims for death or personal inju- classes were or amendments to returns previously pre- ry, subrogated claims, and claims found- physics and This article introduces readers to the many services provided by the Office of pared by the CSD tax personnel. ed in negligence or breach of a contractual auto shop class. Real estate or fiduciary relationship are excluded. All I liked learning the Staff Judge Advocate, Client Services Division (CSD). These are requests for reimbursements claims under this chapter must be present- about the for certain expenses associated with the ed to an Army claims office within 90 days mechanics of The Client Services Division is a con- sale or purchase of a home or early termi- of the incident. cars.” solidated legal office offering a wide vari- nation of a lease pursuant to an authorized ety of free legal services in the areas of Claims initiated by this offi ce permanent change of station (PCS) move legal assistance, income tax assistance, Carrier Recovery Claims and Affirma- Randy for civilian employees. The CSD performs real estate expense reimbursement and tive Claims are the most common types of Handley a legal review for the command’s Approv- claims. Eligible clients include all branch- claims initiated by this office. ATC contractor al Authority to ensure expenses are reason- es of active duty service members (30 days Carrier Recovery claims personnel are able in amount and customarily paid by the or more), retirees, and their Family mem- responsible for administering the U.S. seller or buyer in the residence locality and bers; and under limited circumstances, Army Claims Service’s household goods determine whether there is a specific basis civilian employees. recovery program. The purpose of the to reimburse the requested expense under Located in room 317 on the third floor program is to pursue affirmative claims appropriate regulations and law. “My favorite of Bldg. 4305, the office is comprised of against carriers, warehousemen, or other subject would three attorneys, two paralegal specialists, Claims third parties responsible for loss or damage probably have to two claims examiners, and one legal assis- Claims personnel process and assert occurring during the storage or transport be math because tant. Services are provided Monday, Tues- a variety of claims for loss or damage of household goods, and other person- I’m good at it day, Wednesday and Friday, 9 a.m. to 3 to property. The most common types al property. Recovery from the carrier is and it’s fun!” p.m., and Thursday, 9 a.m. to noon. of claims filed with this office are the based primarily on the carrier’s contractu- Legal assistance following: al responsibility to deliver, in satisfactory condition, the property shipped. Legal assistance is a customer-orient- Personnel claims Affirmative claims personnel initiate ed service of the Army’s Judge Advocate The Personnel Claims Act authoriz- Hunter Lewis action to recover the cost of medical care General’s (JAG) Corps that resolves cli- es the payment of Soldiers’ and DA civil- Family member provided by military treatment facilities ents’ personal legal problems. Resolution ian employees’ claims for the fair market and/or paid for by TRICARE to eligi- may range from giving general advice on value of personal property lost, damaged, ble recipients (i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attendees at George Washington's Resignation of His Commission Old Senate Chamber, Maryland State House, December 23
    Attendees at George Washington’s Resignation of his Commission Old Senate Chamber, Maryland State House, December 23, 1783 Compiled by the Maryland State Archives, February 2009 Known attendees: George Washington Thomas Mifflin, President of the Congress Charles Thomson, Secretary of the Congress Other known attendees: Members of the Governor and Council of Maryland. Specific members are not identified; full membership listed below Members of the government of the City of Annapolis. Specific members are not identified; full membership listed below Henry Harford, former Proprietor of Maryland Sir Robert Eden, former governor Those who attended who wrote about the ceremony in some detail: Dr. James McHenry, Congressman and former aide to Washington Mollie Ridout Dr. James Tilton, Congressman There was a “gallery full of ladies” (per Mollie Ridout), most of whom are unknown Members of the Maryland General Assembly The General Assembly was in Session on December 23, and both houses convened in the State House on December 22 and on December 23. It is difficult to identify specific individuals who were in the Senate Chamber GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 1783 William Paca, governor November 3-December 26, 1783 SENATE WESTERN James McHenry EASTERN Edward Lloyd SHORE SHORE George Plater Daniel Carroll, Matthew John Cadwalader (E, president ' Tilghman Dcl) Thomas Stone Richard Barnes ' (DNS, R) Robert Goldsborough (DNS) (E, Charles Carroll of Benedict Edward Hall John Henry DNS) Carrollton, Samuel Hughes William Hindman William Perry (E) president ' John Smith Josiah Polk (DNS) HOUSE OF DELEGATES ST MARY'S John Dent, of John CECIL Nathan Hammond William Somerville BALTIMORE Archibald Job Thomas Ogle John DeButts Thomas Cockey Deye, Samuel Miller HARFORD Edmund Plowden speaker William Rowland Benjamin Bradford Norris Philip Key Charles Ridgely, of Benjamin Brevard John Love William KENT John Stevenson ANNAPOLIS John Taylor (DNS) Peregrine Lethrbury Charles Ridgely Allen Quynn Ignatius Wheeler, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity and Identification in the American Revolution
    Americans on Paper: Identity and Identification in the American Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Huffman, John Michael. 2013. Americans on Paper: Identity and Identification in the American Revolution. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181108 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Americans on Paper: Identity and Identification in the American Revolution A dissertation presented by John Michael Huffman to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2013 © 2013 John Michael Huffman All rights reserved. Advisor: Professor Joyce E. Chaplin John Michael Huffman Americans on Paper: Identity and Identification in the American Revolution Abstract The American Revolution brought with it a crisis of identification. The political divisions that fragmented American society did not distinguish adherents of the two sides in any outward way. Yet the new American governments had to identify their citizens; potential citizens themselves had to choose and prove their identities; and both sides of the war had to distinguish friend from foe. Subordinated groups who were notionally excluded from but deeply affected by the Revolutionary contest found in the same crisis new opportunity to seize control over their own identities.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Counties Got Their Boundaries
    How The Counties got their Boundaries 1632 – Today 387 years of expansion, grants, divisions, revisions, surveys and litigation Leonard Calvert Alicia Crossland 1550-1611 1552-1587 In 1592, the Catholic, Leonard Calvert had to sign a promise of conformity to the Anglican Church. He was banned Sir George Calvert from employing any Catholic servants. 1st Lord Baltimore 1580-1632 At age of 12, George and his brother Christopher, were sent to a Protestant tutor for their education. The seeds for a place of Religious Freedom may have been planted at an early age. Sir George Calvert James I of England 1st Lord Baltimore 1566-1625 1580-1632 (Reign 1603-1625) George came to know Sir Robert Cecil, the spymaster to Queen Elizabeth, and carry packets for him. When King James I began his reign, Robert Cecil became the King’s Secretary of State and George Calvert came along as an invaluable aid to him. In 1610, Calvert became an advisor/supporter of the King and in 1618, James I appointed him as one of his two Secretaries of State. King James I made Calvert the first baron of Baltimore in 1625, in recognition of his services and loyalty to the Crown. The “Manor of Baltimore” was a 2,300-acre estate in County Longford, Ireland. When James I died his son, Charles I, also called on Calvert to assist him in matters of state. Sir George Calvert – Investment/Colonizing in the New World 1609 - Investment in Second Virginia Company 1609 - Investment in the East India Company 1614 - Increase investment in East India Company 1620 - Purchase a tract of land in
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1976, Volume 71, Issue No. 2
    ARYLAND AZIN N Published Quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society SUMMER 1976 Vol. 71, No. 2 BOARD OF EDITORS JOSEPH L. ARNOLD, University of Maryland, Baltimore County JEAN BAKER, Goucher College GARY BROWNE, Wayne State University JOSEPH W. COX, Towson State College CURTIS CARROLL DAVIS, Baltimore RICHARD R. DUNCAN. Georgetown University RONALD HOFFMAN, University of Maryland, College Park H. H. WALKER LEWIS, Baltimore EDWARD C. PAPENFUSE, Hall of Records BENJAMIN QUARLES, Morgan State College JOHN B. BOLES. Editor, Towson State College NANCY G. BOLES, Assistant Editor RICHARD J. COX, Manuscripts MARY K. MEYER, Genealogy MARY KATHLEEN THOMSEN, Graphics FORMER EDITORS WILLIAM HAND BROWNE, 1906-1909 LOUIS H, DIELMAN, 1910-1937 JAMES W. FOSTER, 1938-1949, 1950-1951 HARRY AMMON, 1950 FRED SHELLEY, 1951-1955 FRANCIS C. HABER, 1955-1958 RICHARD WALSH, 1958-1967 RICHARD R. DUNCAN, 1967-1974 P. WILLIAM FILBY, Director ROMAINE S. SOMERVILLE, Assistant Director The Maryland Historical Magazine is published quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Contributions and correspondence relating to articles, book reviews, and any other editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor in care of the Society. All contributions should be submitted in duplicate, double-spaced, and consistent with the form out- lined in A Manual of Style (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969). The Maryland Historical Society disclaims responsibility for statements made by contributors. Composed and printed at Waverly Press. Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21202. Second-class postage paid at Baltimore, Maryland. © 1976, Maryland Historical Society. K^A ^ 5^'l-2tSZ. I HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY MARYLAND "^ TSTOBTr/^frQUS, MARYLAND No.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1917, Volume 12, Issue No. 3
    /v\5/\ sc 569/ MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE VOL. XII. SEPTEMBER, 1917. No. 3. MEN OF MAEYLAND SPECIALLY HONORED BY THE STATE OR THE UNITED STATES.* AECHEE,, JAMES J., -1864. Captain of Infantry, Feb. 23, 1847; voltigeurs, April 9, 1847; brevet Major, Sept. 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec, Mexico; honorably mus- tered out, Aug. 31, 1848; captain 9th infantry, March 3, 1855 ; resigned May 14, 1861; brigadier-general 0. S. A. 1861; died Oct. 24, 1864. " The thanks of the Legislature for gallant conduct in our recent brilliant and successful struggle with Mexico." [Ees. 18, Acts of 1849.] AECHEE^ EGBBET HAEEIS;, -1878. Second lieutenant of infantry, March 4, 1847; voltigeurs, April 9, 1847; honorably mustered out, Aug. 31, 1848; Lieu- tenant-Colonel 55th Va. inf. C. S. A. 1861-1865; died March 10, 1878. " The thanks of the General Assembly of Maryland for in- trepid and gallant conduct in all the battles of the Valley of Mexico." [Ees. 79, Acts of 1849.] * Compiled by Col. Charles Chaille-Long, and largely supplemented by the Editor. 201 202 MARYLAND H1STOEICAL MAGAZINE. BOWIE, ODES, 1826-1894. Born, Prince •George's co. Md., ]N"ov. 10, 1826; second lieu- tenant in Maryland and D. C. battalion of infantry; commis- sioned captain of voltigeurs; member House of Delegates, 1849 ; Governor of Maryland, 1869-1872; died, December 4, 1894. " The thanks of his native State for distinguished gallantry displayed during the three days' siege of Monterey." [Ees. 43, Acts of 1847.] BOWIE, EOBEET, 1749-1818. Bom in Prince George's county in 1749; Captain 2d bat- talion of Maryland dying artillery, 1776;.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maryland Records in the Revolutionary
    The Maryland Records Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/37/2/277/2746405/aarc_37_2_n4416522628k6121.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 in the Revolutionary War MORRIS L. RADOFF THE CARE OF PUBLIC RECORDS during a war has always been a responsibility of peacetime custodians who have had to evaluate the dangers from invading armies, from friendly soldiers, and from shells, bombs, and fire. The custodians are, in general, ill equipped for this responsibility, and if they were to ask the military for advice, they would usually be worse off than if they had relied on their own common sense. Many examples of the unfortunate dispersal of records are to be found in the history of the last world war. Who would have guessed that the Hotel de Ville of Paris would become the headquarters of the under- ground and that it would have to hold out against a seige? Who would have known that the attack on Italy would come from the south, thereby imperiling the records that had been brought to Sicily and Monte Cassino in order to be protected against a breakthrough in the north such as that of Caporetto in World War I?1 As the Germans abandoned the city, the Brussels Hotel de Ville, with its records, was burned by the Belgians themselves in order to destroy the personnel dossiers which the Nazi had accumulated there. Also, in our own Civil War the records of eastern Virginia were removed to Richmond for safe- keeping. There they were lost in the fire on the day that Lee abandoned the city.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Are Coming, Again: Loyalists, Property
    THE BRITISH ARE COMING, AGAIN: LOYALISTS, PROPERTY CONFISCATION, AND REINTEGRATION IN THE MID-ATLANTIC, 1777-1800 by Kimberly M. Nath A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Spring 2016 © 2016 Kimberly Nath All Rights Reserved ProQuest Number: 10157869 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10157869 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 THE BRITISH ARE COMING, AGAIN: LOYALISTS, PROPERTY CONFISCATION, AND REINTEGRATION IN THE MID-ATLANTIC, 1777-1800 by Kimberly Nath Approved: __________________________________________________________ Arwen P. Mohun, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of History Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ann L. Ardis, Ph.D. Senior Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Difficulities in Loyalism After Independence:The Treatment of Loyalists and Nonjurors in Maryland, 1777-1784
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: DIFFICULITIES IN LOYALISM AFTER INDEPENDENCE:THE TREATMENT OF LOYALISTS AND NONJURORS IN MARYLAND, 1777-1784 Kimberly Michelle Nath, Master of Arts, 2009 Directed By: Whitman Ridgway, Associate Professor, History This thesis examines the difficulties the Maryland legislature encountered with Loyalists and nonjurors after independence. It follows how the legislation passed by the Patriot controlled legislature was implemented from 1777 to 1784. The Maryland legislature first passed legislation to identify those not supporting the American Revolution, mainly the Loyalists and nonjurors. This thesis explores the identification process and then the punitive measures, such as British property confiscation and treble taxes, taken by the legislature. This thesis argues that Patriots succeeded in identifying Loyalists, but struggled to seize all British property and failed to generate vast amounts of revenue. DIFFICULTIES IN LOYALISM AFTER INDEPENDENCE: THE TREATMENT OF LOYALISTS AND NONJURORS IN MARYLAND, 1777-1784 By Kimberly Michelle Nath Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2009 Advisory Committee: Professor Whitman Ridgway, Chair Professor Richard Bell Professor Ira Berlin © Copyright by Kimberly Michelle Nath 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………….. ii Chapter 1: Understanding Loyalism During the American Revolution………………1 Chapter 2: The Treatment of Loyalists in Maryland…………………………...……18 Chapter 3: The Implementation of Law for Loyalists and Nonjurors……………….37 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...76 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………83 ii Chapter 1 – Understanding Loyalism During the American Revolution Over the past 200 years the historical treatment of Loyalists, those who rejected the Revolution and maintained their allegiance to the King, has evolved from antipathy to their incorporation into understanding the Revolutionary experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvert Versus Carroll the Quit-Rent Controversy Between Maryland's Founding Families
    Calvert versus Carroll The Quit-rent Controversy between Maryland’s Founding Families By: Garrett Power Professor University of Maryland School of Law 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 The Calvert Family 1632-1715................................................................................................... 8 Charles Calvert, 3rd Lord Baltimore ...................................................................................... 9 The Carroll Family (1688-1761)............................................................................................... 11 Charles Carroll the Settler..................................................................................................... 11 The Calvert Family (1715-1771) .............................................................................................. 16 Charles Calvert, the 5th Lord Baltimore (1715-1751).......................................................... 16 The Carroll family (1715-1782)................................................................................................ 22 Henry Harford (1781-1783)...................................................................................................... 24 THE OPINION OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT .................................................................... 26 The Issues.................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Diaries of George Washington. Vol. 3. Donald Jackson, Ed.; Dorothy Twohig, Assoc
    The Diaries of George Washington. Vol. 3. Donald Jackson, ed.; Dorothy Twohig, assoc. ed. The Papers of George Washington. Charlottesville The Diaries of GEORGE WASHINGTON Volume III 1771–75, 1780–81 ASSISTANT EDITORS Beverly H. Runge, Frederick Hall Schmidt, and Philander D. Chase George H. Reese, CONSULTING EDITOR Joan Paterson Kerr, PICTURE EDITOR THE DIARIES OF GEORGE WASHINGTON VOLUME III 1771–75, 1780–81 DONALD JACKSON, EDITOR DOROTHY TWOHIG, ASSOCIATE EDITOR UNIVERSITY PRESS OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE This edition has been prepared by the staff of The Papers of George Washington, sponsored by The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union and the University of Virginia with the support of The National Endowment for the Humanities and The National Historical Publications and Records Commission THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF VIRGINIA Copyright © 1978 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia First published 1978 Frontispiece: Washington before Yorktown, by Rembrandt Peale. (Corcoran Gallery of Art, gift of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association) Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Washington, George, Pres. U.S., 1732–1799 The Diaries of George Washington. Vol. 3. Donald Jackson, ed.; Dorothy Twohig, assoc. ed. The Papers of George Washington. Charlottesville http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw.wd03 The diaries of George Washington. Includes bibliographies and indexes. 1. Washington, George, Pres. U.S., 1732–1799. 2. Presidents—United States—Biography. I. Jackson, Donald Dean, 1919— II. Twohig, Dorothy. III. Title E312.8 1976 973.4′1′0924 [B] 75-41365 ISBN 0—8139—0721—7 (v. 3) Printed in the United States of America Administrative Board David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Confiscating Loyalist Estates During the American Revolution
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected 2019 Faculty Bibliography Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage 2019 Property Rights, Citizenship, Corruption, and Inequality: Confiscating Loyalist Estates during the American Revolution Marcus Gallo Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib_2019 Part of the History Commons property rights, citizenship, corruption, and inequality confiscating loyalist estates during the american revolution abstract: In Maryland, fierce debate attended the decision to confiscate loyal- ist lands, but the state eventually embraced confiscation, seizing significantly more loyalist land than neighbors who had access to lands in the trans-Appalachian west. State senators who initially objected to property confiscations found themselves forced by necessity to adopt a revolutionary view of subjecthood, in which loyal- ists who abandoned the state voluntarily abrogated their citizenship. While some irregularity surrounded Maryland’s confiscations, this paled in comparison to the corruption that attended confiscation in neighboring states like Pennsylvania and New Jersey. However, as in other confiscations, the state’s political and military offic- ers came to dominate purchases of loyalist land, demonstrating the influence of the wealthy over Maryland’s political process. keywords: Confiscation, land speculation, revolution, property rights, loyalists In 1777, with the American Revolutionary War in the balance, the Continental Congress suggested confiscating loyalist property as a means of raising money. Although it left the final decision for this measure to the discretion of the rebelling states, all thirteen passed confiscation legislation targeting active loyalists who abandoned the state or fought against the patriots. States varied widely in the amount of land they confiscated. Confiscation met little real political opposition in Pennsylvania, where the state sold around 40,000 acres of loyalist land beginning in 1778.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Toleration Act Pdf
    Maryland Toleration Act Pdf exquisitelyLevitical Tymothy or podded always emotionally. disfeature Pomeranian his yatters ifTannie Dario israp arthritic his palaeolith or sprinkle miniate incessantly. insuperably. Liberatory and shrieval Brock often overstock some alliances Chapter 2 Colonizing America 1519-1733 Hope Charter. 1647 John Biddle XII Arguments Drawn Out until the Scriptures 164 Cambridge Platform 1649 Act for Religious Toleration passed by Maryland Assembly. Toleration in Maryland Dominicana Journal. The Maryland Toleration Act in 1649 to counteract accusations that his colony was 20 Privy Council A step of advisers assembled to bloat the. Compiled Handouts Bill of Rights Institute. Benedict calvert patent begins with maryland toleration act pdf copy is also potentially damage his heirs. Unit 1 review packet settlement of the colonies and early. It became third time as maryland toleration act pdf copy of a normal paces and to write and western shore, that protect human person has been practised, deals chiefly with those framers wrote to? Gallies for teachers pay off and principles and governor shortly after further activity that maryland toleration act pdf from lord baltimore. God existed as official historian of maryland, clinical professor elton, rather than half centuries of maryland toleration act pdf from patrick henry harford would one. Thus enjoyed greater conflict, maryland toleration act pdf from. This vision was soon codified in Maryland's 1649 Act Concerning Religion also called the Toleration Act which was right first fuel in our nation's history to. --named the colony Maryland in rumor of the queen -Toleration Act of 1649 granted religious freedom to attempt who believed in Jesus Christ 2 The Carolinas.
    [Show full text]