[DOCUMENT TITLE] [Document Subtitle] Robin’S Tales Education Programme Evaluation Executive Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Broxtowe Matters Summercommunity 2019 in This Issue Clean-Up
Broxtowe matters SummerCommunity 2019 In this issue Clean-up Live life to the full in Independent Living LEAN&GREEN C Broxtowe Borough Council CLEAN&GREEN Page 18 Broxtowe Borough Council Election Special Page 12 £25,000 for mental health projects Page 10 Teaching the next generation CLEAN&GREEN Broxtowe Borough Council As part of our Clean and Green Campaign, our Recycling Team have been out and about recently visiting local schoolchildren to help them learn about recycling and protecting the environment for the future. Read more on Page 14. www.broxtowe.gov.uk www.broxtowe.gov.uk Local care from a local company Call us on: 0115 9226116 www.homeinstead.co.uk/Nottingham Home Instead Senior Care, is an award-winning local company specialising in providing care to people in their own homes. The company opened its office in Nottingham over 8 years ago and provides a full range of services to help people of all ages remain independent. Recommended highly by the Care Quality Commission for their level of quality service and positive client testimonials. Home Instead delivers care to clients across Nottingham with a wide range of needs. Caregivers have practical experience in supporting clients with conditions such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Diabetes. The Home Instead Senior Care service allows people to remain at home and lead an independent life. From a few hours a day, up to 24 hours 7 days a week Mrs Catherine B and CAREGiver Joy, winners of the we provide a full care service to match the needs of the individual. -
Chapter One: Introduction 1
Feminism, citizenship and social activity: The role and importance of local women’s organisations, Nottingham 1918-1969 Samantha Clements, B.A., M.A. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2008 ABSTRACT This local study of single-sex organisations in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire is an attempt to redress some of the imbalanced coverage given to this area of history thus far. A chronological study, it examines the role, importance and, to some extent, impact of a wide range of women’s organisations in the local context. Some were local branches of national organisations, others were specifically concerned with local issues. The local focus allows a challenge to be made to much current thought as to the strength of a “women’s movement” in the years between the suffrage movement and the emergence of a more radical form of feminism in the 1970s. The strength of feminist issues and campaigning is studied in three periods – the inter-war period, the Second World War and its immediate aftermath, and the 1950s and 1960s. The first two periods have previously been studied on a national level but, until recently, the post-Second World war era has been written off as overwhelmingly domestic and therefore unconstructive to the achievement of any feminist aims. This study suggests that, at a local level, this is not the case and that other conclusions reached about twentieth century feminism at a national level are not always applicable to the local context. The study also goes further than attempting to track interest in equality feminism in the mid years of the century by discussing the importance of citizenship campaigns and the social dimension of membership of women’s organisations. -
Bilborough (May 2019) Item No
Wards Affected: Bilborough (May 2019) Item No: Planning Committee 20th January 2021 Report of Director of Planning and Regeneration Former Melbury School Playing Fields, Melbury Road 1 Summary Application No: 20/00264/PFUL3 for planning permission Application by: Pelham Architects on behalf of Starfish Commercial & NCHA Proposal: Construction of 50 houses and bungalows. The application is brought to Committee because a resolution to grant planning permission would directly conflict with the recommendation of an external statutory consultee, the Nottinghamshire County Council as Local Highway Authority. To meet the Council's Performance Targets, an extension of time has been agreed to determine the application by 1st February 2021. 2 Recommendations 2.1 To GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION subject to: (a) Prior completion of an agreement under s111 of the Local Government Act 1972 to secure a Section 106 Planning Obligation in respect of: (i) An Education contribution towards secondary school places of £122,864; (ii) Local Employment and Training opportunities, including a financial contribution of £16,244 (b) The indicative conditions substantially in the form of those listed in the draft decision notice at the end of this report. 2.2 Power to determine the final details of both the terms of the Planning Obligation and the conditions of the planning permission to be delegated to the Director of Planning and Regeneration. 2.3 That Committee are satisfied that Regulation 122(2) Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 is complied with, in that the planning obligations sought are (a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms, (b) directly related to the development and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. -
Chapter 8 [PDF]
Chapter Eight: Accessibility Priorities for Greater Nottingham Accessibility Strategy 2006/7 – 2010/11 147 148 Accessibility Strategy 2006/7 – 2010/11 Introduction 8.1. Following on from the Strategic Accessibility Assessment in Chapter 7, this chapter sets out the accessibility priorities for Greater Nottingham and explains why specific issues, groups and areas have been selected for action over the Plan period, with more detailed local accessibility analysis presented for the Local Accessibility Action plans proposed for early action from 2006/7. Accessibility priorities – initial scoping 8.2. An initial scoping of the likely accessibility priorities for the Plan area was presented in the Framework Accessibility Strategy which drew upon the opportunities identified from the wider national and local policy context set out in Chapters 3 and 4 and the partnership working described in Chapter 6. This provided a broad picture of the accessibility issues facing Greater Nottingham and where future resources and action should be concentrated over the Plan period in terms of key origins, destinations and networks: 8.3. Origins: Access requirements need to be considered for key population groups across Greater Nottingham, with a particular focus on those without access to a car, plus all those living within specific communities which have been prioritised by the authorities as being in particular need. Accessibility origins are set out in Table 8.1. 8.4. Destinations: Consideration was also given to the location of core services. The priority destinations set out in Table 8.2 include new employment land sites, district centres as defined in the Local Plans, other local centres and major shopping locations and other key destinations determined by developments taking place over the Plan period as set out in the programme in Annex D. -
High Pavement Sixth Form College
REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE High Pavement Sixth Form College June 1995 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council has a legal duty to make sure further education in England is properly assessed. The FEFC’s inspectorate inspects and reports on each college of further education every four years. The inspectorate also assesses and reports nationally on the curriculum and gives advice to FEFC’s quality assessment committee. College inspections are carried out in accordance with the framework and guidelines described in Council Circular 93/28. They involve full-time inspectors and registered part-time inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the work they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member who does not work in education and a member of staff from the college being inspected. GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are set out in the Council Circular 93/28. During their inspection, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Their assessments are set out in the reports. They also use a five-point grading scale to summarise the balance between strengths and weaknesses. The descriptors for the grades are: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • grade 4 – provision in which the weaknesses clearly outweigh the strengths • grade 5 – provision which has many weaknesses and very few strengths. Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT Telephone 01203 863000 Fax 01203 863100 © FEFC 1995 You may photocopy this report. -
2839-18 Redacted Response
Our Ref: 2839.18 1 May 2018 Dear Re: Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Thank you for your request for information, which was received by the Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner on 5 April 2018. INFORMATION REQUESTED Please provide the register of premises or land owned by, or occupied for the purposes of, the office of Police and Crime Commissioner, and the functions of their force, for the financial year 2017/18. Entries listed should be broken down by local policing directorate (or borough), and indicate whether it is: Police building Other building/land Neighbourhood office Other RESPONSE Under S 1 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), I can confirm that the Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner does hold the information you have requested. Please see attached document that answers your questions. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in the Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner. Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please write or contact the Freedom of Information Officer on telephone number 0115 8445998 or e-mail [email protected]. The Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner Arnot Hill House, Arnot Hill Park, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 6LU T 0115 844 5998 F 0115 844 5081 E nopcc@nottingh amshire.pnn.police.uk W www.nottinghamshire.pcc.police.uk Yours sincerely Lisa Gilmour Business Support Manager Nottinghamshire Office of the Police -
College Bus Timetable 2019-20
COLLEGE BUS TIMETABLE 2019-20 In association with Correct at time of publication (July 2019) Prices and timetables are subject to change 1 Introducing Our Bus Service Bilborough College provides a heavily subsidised, dedicated and reliable bus service for students. The bus service covers areas of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, thereby making the college accessible to students from a wide catchment area. The College offer this service in partnership with Skills Motor Coaches. Skills have provided the bus service for the college for the past six years and have a history of 90 years’ experience in passenger transport across the East Midlands. This family firm continues to provide Bilborough College with a high level of service and reliability. Stewart Ryalls is our key contact at Skills and works closely with the college in all matters relating to the bus service. We have a team at college who will help with the bus services and can be contacted on 0115 8515000 or [email protected] if you have any further queries. If you wish to apply for a bus pass, then you need to log into the College’s Wisepay system. This can be accessed from the front page of the college website. Bus passes can be found under the College Shop tab – then College Bus Passes. Select the appropriate zone (either payment in full or by Direct debit) and then select your route from the drop-down menu. Please ensure you purchase the correct zone for your stop. Second year students can apply for a bus pass anytime during the summer term. -
EIB Strategy Consultation Full
EducationImprovementBoard Page:1 Education Improvement Board Education Improvement Board This report was generated on 07/12/15. Overall 157 respondents completed this questionnaire. The report has been filtered to show the responses for 'All Respondents'. The following charts are restricted to the top 12 codes. Are you responding as? TICK ALL THAT APPLY A Head teacher (5) 3% A Teacher (63) 41% Other Educational staff (11) 7% School Governor (City School) (12) 8% School Governor (County School) (2) 1% Parent of child in city school (35) 23% Pupil at a city school (2) 1% Other (43) 28% Please state External provider A concerned citizen Local Authority adviser City Council Education Department Officer Professor of Education From Gedling Parent of a home-schooled child in Nottingham City data analyst A parent at a County School - I moved to County from the City - reason quality offer of education Former secondary school teacher in Nottingham (maths, science) a council tax payer member of public, parent (children now grown up) Ex Governor Parent of child in college retired teacher Someone who thinks education is key to developing a thriving city environment for all citizens. Ex pupil Grandparent Ex School Office Manager and ex parent of pupil in city school Parent of a City Child but decided to send to a County School. SnapSnap snapsurveys.comsnapsurveys.com EducationImprovementBoard Page:2 Education Improvement Board Please state Retired Head of Mathematics Department, later Director of Resources City Comprehensives Data Analyst Student (PhD -
Nottingham City Council Response to the Lgbce Consultation on Warding Patterns in the City of Nottingham
CITY COUNCIL - 11 SEPTEMBER 2017 REPORT OF THE LEADER OF THE COUNCIL NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL RESPONSE TO THE LGBCE CONSULTATION ON WARDING PATTERNS IN THE CITY OF NOTTINGHAM 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This report sets out a proposed Nottingham City Council response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) Review of Electoral Equality in Nottingham City. 1.2 Council are asked to consider a proposal for Warding Patterns in the City of Nottingham, for submission to the LGBCE, and provide formal endorsement. 1.3 More details of the proposal are set out below under Section 7 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 That Council endorse the proposal for submission to the LGBCE. 3 REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 The pattern of wards proposed is the most appropriate to enable the authority to meet the criteria for the review set out by the LGBCE, whilst also addressing the specific concerns raised by the LGBCE in respect of the level of electoral equality in the Bilborough, Bridge, Dunkirk & Lenton and Wollaton East & Lenton Abbey wards. 3.2 The proposal allows the City Council to continue to provide efficient local government services and effective decision making, whilst allowing Councillors to continue their representational and leadership roles in the city. 3.3 The proposal ensures that existing local communities and ties in the city are maintained and respected as much as possible, whilst still meeting the LGBCE’s criteria and addressing their concerns. 4 OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED IN MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 A number of different options for potential warding patterns for Nottingham City were considered, based on the preferred Council size of 55 Councillors. -
L2 PDF Timetable
d A R R a LA L H D NE U 53 C S ad K o R N A The Vale . y Highbury L L e d L ll Phoenix Park R City A a Vale V R Hospital N O y N k A E a ut l r hall l at D W B i a e h y-p H f as h Cinderhill P ie N s r ld R . O d TT e V e I d e s NG d n u H n a A i DoubleTree o F t D o M R n A ROA C e RO h D n o d Nuthall Hotel ld t r EY o o o R LL o n n VA dtho V r is oo r W Ba W gn E A R e Get in touch... a R d Assarts ll . us N R N irc U oa O Farm C T d N H ad A Ro n y LocallinkDavid Lane L2 Morningto Cr E L NCN Basford e r y s L R le u l Woodthorpe . N a d b (Basford O V Roa s R y A O err Court e A A P L D m Hall) D For journey planning visit... A Lane Dulverton ill L2/X2 kh P S c gton Cres. to e in Vale S Changes to L2 timetable from 7th June 2021 include Nottingham Business Park, Glaisdale rn rc Sherwood W o S M N y in L c www.robinhoodnetwork.co.uk U AD hes L e Basford t t. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Dales, Mapperley and St Ann's Area Committee, 03/03/2020 18:00
Public Document Pack Nottingham City Council Dales, Mapperley and St Ann's Area Committee Date: Tuesday, 3 March 2020 Time: 6.00 pm Place: St Ann's Joint Service Centre - St Ann's Valley Centre Councillors are requested to attend the above meeting to transact the following business Corporate Director for Strategy and Resources Governance Officer: Kate Morris, Governance Officer Direct Dial: 0115 8764353 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of interests 3 Minutes 3 - 12 Of the meeting held on 14 January (for confirmation) 4 Area Policing update Verbal Verbal update by Inspector James Walker, Nottinghamshire Police. 5 Issues and good news stories Verbal Verbal Updates from Community Representatives 6 Health within the Area a Ward Health Profiles and Local Health Priorities 13 - 40 Report and Presentation by Alison Challenger, Director of Public Health. b The Local Primary Care Network 41 - 56 Verbal presentation by joint Clinical Directors Dr Hussain Gandhi and Dr Margaret Abbott. 7 Recent Major Developments 57 - 64 Report of the Director of Planning and Regeneration, Jointly presented by Mark Lowe, Head of Housing and Regeneration and Paul Seddon, Director of Planning and Regeneration. 8 Parks and Open Spaces a Parks & Open Spaces Investment Plan Updates 65 - 76 Report of the Director of Neighbourhood Services, presented by James Dymond, Parks and Open Spaces Manager b Future Parks Accelerator 77 - 82 Report of the Director of Neighbourhood Services, Presented by James Tilford, Parks Development Officer 9 Nottingham City Homes 83 - 102 Report of the Chief Executive of Nottingham City Homes, Presented by Luke Walters, Area Housing Manager. -
The Nottinghamshire Baptists and Education
The Nottinghamshire Baptists and Education EFORE the nineteenth century educational opportunities for the B poor were meagre. In Nottinghamshire there were ten endowed grammar schools and about fifty endowed elementary schools, many of them linked with chantry bequests. In country districts there were "dame schools" where a little reading and writing were taught at a fee of threepence a week. In Nottingham itself facilities were even scantier. For the few who could gain admission there were three en dowed grammar schools, the Free Grammar School, the Bluecoat School and the High Pavement School, and a number of private "aca demies". Dearden's Directory of 1834 lists eighty-six such schools, and when the Education Act of 1870 was passed there were over a hundred, of which thirty-two charged less than ninepence a week. One of the Nottinghamshire elementary schools, Collingham, was of Baptist foundation. In his will of 1699 William Harte left an endow ment to provide a school for the children of the village; his wife, Mary Harte, increased this in 1713.1 The teacher was to be a Baptist. In 1828 the school had twenty-three boys on its roll, of whom five were of Baptist families. Half a century later the endowment provided £50 a year and was supplemented by £15-£18 from public funds. The last surviving register, that of 1892-3, lists thirty-four girls but no boys. The school closed in the early years of this century. Baptist ministers frequendy supplemented their income by running private schools. There were at least two such schools in Nottingham shire early in the nineteenth century; one at Beeston, conducted by Thomas Rogers, and another at Sutton-in-Ashfield, conducted by Clement N ott.