DOCSLIB.ORG

Benchmarking Report Abaldasarre.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benchmarking Report Abaldasarre.Pages Access & Affordability at Carleton College Benchmarking Report Anna Baldasarre Access & Affordability at Carleton College !2 This benchmarking report will present data on indicators of access and affordability at Carleton College and a set of aspirational peers. Carleton College is widely recognized as one of the best liberal arts colleges in the nation. Located in rural Northfield, MN, Carleton is recognized by the Carnegie Classifications as a baccalaureate college with a focus on arts and sciences and educates approximately 2,000 four-year undergraduate students in a selective, residential environment (The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2015). In order to assess access and affordability at Carleton, the chosen indicators represent data on student demographics and finances. The indicators for access will demonstrate student demographics regarding gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic position to determine if underrepresented students are attending Carleton and if they are succeeding while enrolled. The indicators related to affordability will offer information regarding the total cost of attendance, financial assistance including loans and grants, and endowment assets. These indicators are intended to help determine if a prestigious education is available to a wide variety of students. Eight peer institutions will provide the data against which to benchmark Carleton’s information. These institutions were chosen from among a list of fifteen comparison institutions indicated on College Results Online. These institutions are similar to Carleton in that they are selective, residential, and located in rural or suburban areas. They enroll approximately 1,500 to 2,500 undergraduate students in liberal arts baccalaureate programs that focus on the arts and sciences. The U.S. News & World Report rankings were used to narrow down the comparison institutions into a selection of aspirational peers; Carleton College was placed eighth in the rankings, and the aspirational institutions in this report were ranked first, third, tied for fourth, Access & Affordability at Carleton College !3 and tied for ninth (U.S. News & World Report, 2016). Although there is controversy over the validity of the rankings, they remain a widely publicized form of information for prospective students and families, thus obligating many institutions to notice their placement and strive to move up in the rankings. The final list of aspirational institutions consists of Williams College (MA), Swarthmore College (PA), Middlebury College (VT), Bowdoin College (ME), Davidson College (NC), Pomona College (CA), Wellesley College (MA), and Claremont McKenna College (CA). Access & Affordability at Carleton College !4 Access Indicators (Source: College Results Online) 6-year graduation rate (all students, 2014) Carleton College Aspirational Institutions 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 6-year graduation rates (all students, 2014) 6-year graduation rate (underrepresented minority students) Carleton College Aspirational Institutions 90% 88.75% 87.5% 86.25% 85% 6-year graduation rates (underrepresented minority students) Access & Affordability at Carleton College !5 Percentage of underrepresented minority students Carleton College Aspirational Institutions 17% 12.75% 8.5% 4.25% 0% Percentage of underrepresented minority students Percentage of students by gender Carleton College Aspirational Institutions 60% 45% 30% 15% 0% Percentage of women students Percentage of men students Access & Affordability at Carleton College !6 Percentage of Pell recipients among freshmen students Carleton College Aspirational Institutions 17% 16% 15% 14% 13% Percentage of Pell recipients among freshman students Discussion The access indicators reveal that Carleton College and its peer institutions enroll a very small percentage of underrepresented minority students, and those who are enrolled are less likely to persist to graduation. Only 10% of Carleton’s study body consists of underrepresented minority students, and only 16.6% of the combined study body of the aspirational institutions. Carleton seems to be not very accessible to minority students. This may be attributed in part to location, campus culture, admissions policies, or finances. The aspirational data suggests that more minority students can be successful at schools like Carleton, so the college should consider ways to make the campus more welcoming to students of underrepresented races or ethnicities. Yet enrolling minority students is only part of the challenge Carleton faces; the other part is exploring strategies to ensure their success, health, and happiness, while on campus. The 6- year graduation rate for all students at both Carleton and the aspirational institutions is 93%, but Access & Affordability at Carleton College !7 the 6-year graduation rate for underrepresented students drops to 86.8% and 89.1%, respectively. These would be admirable percentages on their own, however, when compared to the graduation rate of all students, it is clear that minority students find it more difficult to graduate than non- minority students. Carleton does not lag far behind its peers but does have a slightly lower graduation rate; to help raise the number of minority students who graduate in six years, the college might consider studying reasons why minority students do not finish. Potential solutions might focus on increasing academic and cultural support for these students so that they feel comfortable on the campus and are prepared to succeed in class. This report also finds that Carleton is inaccessible to many low-income students. College Results Online describes it as an “engine of inequality” because it does not enroll many students from working class or low-income backgrounds and ranks in the bottom 5% of all four-year colleges and universities nationally to enroll Pell grant recipients. Of the freshman class, 14.4% receive Pell grants. Once again, Carleton’s aspirational institutions show slight improvement at 16.2%. The final indicator of access measured the percentages of students by gender. Carleton appears to have no problems attracting both men and women students, as 52.9% of students are women and 47.1% are men. The outlier in the aspirational group was Wellesley College, which enrolls 99.3% women students. Access & Affordability at Carleton College !8 Affordability Indicators (Source: College Results Online) Total price for in-state, on-campus students Carleton College Aspirational Institutions $60,500.00 $60,375.00 $60,250.00 $60,125.00 $60,000.00 Total price for in-state, on-campus students Average net price after grants Carleton College Aspirational Institutions $34,000.00 $25,500.00 $17,000.00 $8,500.00 $0.00 Average net price after grants Access & Affordability at Carleton College !9 Average freshman student loan (all sources) Carleton College Aspirational Institutions $7,000.00 $5,250.00 $3,500.00 $1,750.00 $0.00 Average freshman student loan (all sources) Median debt of completers Carleton College Aspirational Institutions $18,000.00 $17,250.00 $16,500.00 $15,750.00 $15,000.00 Median debt of completers Access & Affordability at Carleton College !10 Endowment assets/total FTE (2014) Carleton College Aspirational Institutions $800,000.00 $600,000.00 $400,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 Endowment assets/total FTE (2014) Discussion The affordability indicators show that Carleton is typically a more expensive college choice than its aspirational institutions. Carleton charges a higher total price for in-state, on- campus students than the comparison group, and the average net price remains higher even after accounting for grants. After grants, the average Carleton student will need to pay $32,017.00 while the cost to attend the other institutions averages at $21,615.50. This difference of more than $10,000 may be prohibitive for some students and/or place significant financial strain on them. Carleton graduates will likely have gone into debt in order to finance their educations; the median debt of Carleton completers is $17,500.00 and the median debt of the aspirational group completers is $15,369.25. Interestingly, the average freshman at Carleton will take out student loans in the amount of $4,824.00, while the average freshman attending an institution in the comparison group will take out $6,150.88 in loans. Due to Carleton’s higher total and net price, it would be expected Access & Affordability at Carleton College !11 that these students also have higher amounts of loans. Regardless of the difference between student loans at Carleton at its peer institutions, the average freshman student loan does not cover the previously state net price of any of these institutions. It is possible that Carleton’s students are finding more outside scholarships or earning money from part- or full-time jobs to pay for their education, but perhaps the difference in loans is more likely connected to the college’s lack of socioeconomic diversity. As previously mentioned Carleton enrolls a very low percentage of working class and low income students, indicating that students from middle or upper class backgrounds may be paying for their educations with funds from parents or other relatives. The final affordability indicator measured the endowment assets per total full-time equivalent (FTE) students. For each student Carleton enrolls, the college has $390,191.00 in endowment funds. For each student the comparison group enrolls, the colleges have $735,527.50 in endowment funds. While these both seem like staggering statistics,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memory,Ritual and Place in Africa TWIN CITIES AFRICANIST SYMPOSIUM
    Sacred Ground: Memory,Ritual and Place in Africa TWIN CITIES AFRICANIST SYMPOSIUM Carleton College February 21-22, 2003 Events Schedule Friday, February 21 Great Hall, 4 to 9 p.m. Welcoming Remarks Allen Isaacman, University of Minnesota Keynote Lecture “The Politics and Poetics of Sacred Sites” Sandra Greene, Professor of History, Cornell University 4 to 6 p.m. Reception with African Food, Live Music Musical performance by Jalibah Kuyateh and the Mandingo Griot Ensemble 6 to 9 p.m. Saturday, February 22 Alumni Guest House Meeting Room Morning panel: 9 to 10:30 a.m. Theme: Sacred Ground: Memory, Ritual and Place in Africa Chair: Sandra Greene, Cornell University William Moseley, Department of Geography, Macalester College, “Leaving Hallowed Practices for Hollow Ground: Wealth, Poverty and Cotton Production in Southern Mali” Kathryn Linn Geurts, Department of Anthropology, Hamline University, “Migration Myths, Landscape, and Cultural Memory in Southeastern Ghana” Jamie Monson, Department of History, Carleton College, “From Protective Lions to Angry Spirits: Local Discourses of Land Degradation in Tanzania” Cynthia Becker, Department of Art History, University of St. Thomas, “Zaouia: Sacred Space, Sufism and Slavery in the Trans-Sahara Caravan Trade” Coffee Break Mid-Morning panel: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Theme: Memory, Ritual and Performance in Africa Chair: Dianna Shandy, Macalester College Michele Wagner, Department of History, University of Minnesota, “Reburial in Rwanda: Ritual of Healing or Ritual of Revenge?” Tommie Jackson, Department of English, St. Cloud State University, “‘Fences’ in the drama by August Wilson and ‘Sizwe Bansi is Dead,’ by Athol Fugard” Helena Pohlandt-McCormick, Department of History, University of Minnesota, “Memory and Violence in Soweto” Pamela Feldman-Savelsberg, Department of Anthropology, Carleton College, “Remembering the Troubles: Collective Memory and Reproduction in Cameroon” Break 12:30 to 2 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Alumni Association Award Recipients
    2005 Alumni Association Award Recipients 'C' CLUB HALL OF FAME The Carleton College Alumni ‘C’ Club inducted four new members into its Hall of Fame during Reunion weekend Bill Hendren ’50, a four-year letter winner in cross-country and indoor and outdoor track and field, holds the rare distinction of serving as a team captain in all three sports. He graduated as the Carleton record-holder in the indoor half- mile and mile runs and the outdoor mile run. He won the Minnesota state cross- country meet as a freshman and helped set new Carleton Relays records in the sprint and two-mile relays, and the mile. Hendren served as president of the ‘C’ Club his senior year, helping athletics become more visible on the Carleton campus. He continues to be a leader in the running world, having founded and coached a youth track club in Ventura, California. Lydia Neilsen ’95 was Carleton’s first female NCAA individual swimming champion, capturing the 1995 100-yard breaststroke title and becoming the first Division III female to break 1:05.00 in the event. She earned three All-America citations in the 100-yard breaststroke and was an All-America honorable mention in the 200-yard breaststroke. She captured the MIAC title in the 100- and 200-yard breaststroke in 1995 and helped the 200-yard medley relay team to victory as well. She was a four-time all-conference performer and set three school records. She earned an NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship and was an Academic All-America selection as well as the first recipient of the Pat Lamb Award as Carleton’s top female student-athlete of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014Football Guide
    2014 FOOTBALL GUIDE WWW.GAC.EDU/ATHLETICS/FB ABOUT GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE For over 150 years, Gustavus Adolphus College has been educating tomorrow’s leaders to reason and act responsibly through its educational quality, accessible facilities, spiritual identity, and economic value. Quality is a word that finds its way into many colleges’ vocabularies. At Gustavus, quality is evident in its students, faculty, facilities, and programs, leading to recognition by a host of impartial critics. Forbes.com ranked Gustavus among the top 100 institutions in the country in its college report based upon several factors, including the average amount of student debt and the four-year graduation rate. The College is also included in other national guides and rankings, for example the Fiske Guide, U.S. News & World Report’s Best College Guide, and the Princeton Review, which in addition has ranked the Gustavus Dining Service among the best in the nation in each of the past two years. Gustavus students typically rank in the top third of their high school graduating class, and over 37 percent rank in the upper 10 percent of their class. Continuing their achievement at Gustavus, students find a challenging academic atmosphere where professors—98 percent of tenured faculty members have earned the highest degree in KING GUSTAV II ADOLF: THE their field—teach all classes (there are no graduate assistants) and serve as academic advisers. Collaborative learning is the norm, with exceptionally NAMESAKE OF GUSTAVUS motivated students invited to conduct research
    [Show full text]
  • Selective College Admissions Five Important Tips
    Selective College Admissions Five Important Tips Webinar: August 31, 2020 1 A few important notes: • Our priority in the college counseling program at Minnetonka High School – helping the student to find the right fit! • Our hope – to focus on going to a college that is a good match, not to focus on getting in. • Every student is encouraged to follow this application guideline – “You apply for admission to a college Because you would like to go there!” 2 Categories of selectivity – What does “selective” mean? • Most selective – acceptance rate Below 15% (Harvard, Princeton, University of Chicago, Yale) • Highly selective – acceptance rate of 15-30% (Boston University, Carleton, Colgate, Emory, Georgetown) • Moderately selective – acceptances of 31-60% (Denison, Denver, Macalester, Providence, St. Olaf) • Selective – acceptances of 61-90% (Drake, Hamline, Iowa State, Marquette, NeBraska, St. Thomas) Most selective • University of Chicago – freshman class of 1,726 Applicants 34,641 Admitted 2,137 (6%) ACT mid-50th 33-35 Top 10% 99% % Graduating 95% Highly selective • Carleton College – freshman class of 525 Applicants 7,324 Admitted 1,401 (19%) ACT mid-50th 31-34 Top 10% 71% % Graduating 92% Highly selective • Boston University – freshman class of 3,156 Applicants 62,224 Admitted 11,786 (20%) ACT mid-50th 30-33 Top 10% 64% % Graduating 88% Moderately selective • University of Denver – freshman class of 1,351 Applicants 21,028 Admitted 12,345 (58%) ACT mid-50th 26-31 Top 10% 39% % Graduating 77% Selective • Drake University – freshman class of 782 Applicants 6,944 Admitted 4,697 (68%) ACT mid-50th 24-30 Top 10% 39% % Graduating 82% Early application options • Early Decision – students make a binding commitment to a first-choice institution where, if admitted, they must enroll.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Academic Catalog P a G E | 1
    Virginia Wesleyan University 2020 - 2021 Academic Catalog P a g e | 1 Undergraduate Academic Catalog 2020 - 2021 Statement of Non-Discrimination Virginia Wesleyan University is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Applicants are considered on the basis of skills, experience, and qualifications without regard to race, religion, color, creed, gender, national and ethnic origin, age, marital status, covered veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, the presence of non-job-related medical disability, or any other legally protected status. Complaints relevant to Title IX are managed by the University’s Title IX Coordinator, Karla Rasmussen, 757.455.3316 or by emailing [email protected]. Complaints may also be reported directly to the Office for Civil Rights. This catalog is published by Virginia Wesleyan University and contains information concerning campus life, academic policies, program and course offerings, and career preparation. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with the academic policies contained in the catalog. Failure to do so does not excuse students from the requirements and regulations described herein. Disclaimer: The catalog is offered as a guide, not as a contract. It is not intended to and does not contain all policies and regulations that relate to students. The University reserves the right to make alterations in programs, course offerings, policies, and fees without prior notice. For the Online Degree Completion and Graduate Programs Catalog, please visit: vwu.edu/gradonline Virginia Wesleyan
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Working Group on Williams in The
    DRAFT Report of the Working Group Williams in the World Working Group Members: Jackson Ennis, Class of 2020 Jim Kolesar ’72, Office of the President Colin Ovitsky, Center for Learning in Action Noah Sandstrom, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program Sharifa Wright ’03, Alumni Relations February 2020 1 Table of Contents Background……………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Our Work…………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Themes……………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Aspirations for the next decade……………………………………………………………………7 Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………………………... 9 Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………….. 12 To Close…………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Appendices 1: Williams in the World charge………………………………..……………………….…........ 15 2: Summary of Outreach…………………………………………………………………….…. 16 3: Tactical and Tangible Ideas That Arose From Outreach……………………………….……. 18 4: Centers for Engaged Learning or Scholarship at Several Peer Schools……………………... 21 2 Background The story of Williams’s engagement in the world is long and interesting. We have space here only to summarize it. For most of its life, Williams understood itself as a “college on a hill.” Students withdrew here to contemplate higher things before heading back into the “real world.” The vocation of faculty was to pass on that knowledge, while staff supported the operation by managing the day-to-day. Over time, however, all of these lines blurred. The beginning may have come in the early 1960s, when students formed the Lehman Service Council to organize their projects in the local community. Two student-initiated programs, the Williamstown Youth Center and the Berkshire Food Project, still thrive. In the way that the student-formed Lyceum of Natural History, some of whose interactions with other cultures we now question, eventually led to the introduction of science into the curriculum, so too in time did the engagement seed germinated in the Lehman Council disperse widely through the college.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Olaf College
    National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment September 2020 Assessment in Motion: Steps Toward a More Integrated Model Susan Canon, Kelsey Thompson, and Mary Walczak Olaf College St. Foreword By Pat Hutchings As part of an ongoing effort to track and explore developments in student learning outcomes assessment, the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) has published a number of institutional case studies which are housed on the website. We are now revisiting and updating some of those earlier examples in order to understand how campus assessment practices evolve over time—through lessons learned from local experience but also as a result of changes in institutional priorities, the launch of new initiatives, leadership transitions, and trends in the larger assessment movement. This report on St. Olaf College is an update of theoriginal 2012 case study by Natasha Jankowski. Founded in 1874 by Norwegian Lutheran immigrants, St. Olaf College is a nationally ranked residential liberal arts college of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) located in Northfield, Minnesota. St. Olaf challenges students to excel in the liberal arts, examine faith and values, and explore meaningful vocation in an inclusive, globally engaged community nourished by Lutheran tradition. St. Olaf has roughly 3,000 students, offers 49 majors and 20 concentrations (minors), and has a robust study-abroad program, with more than two-thirds of students studying abroad before graduating. St. Olaf has a long history with assessment, having participated in many different assessment initiatives over the years including a Teagle-funded project with Carleton College and Macalester College focused on using assessment findings to improve specific learning outcomes, and eth Associated Colleges of the Midwest-Teagle Collegium on Student Learning exploring how students learn and acquire the knowledge and skills of a liberal education.
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Adolphus College 2013-14 Women's Basketball
    Gustavus Adolphus College 2013-14 Women’s Basketball 2013-14 SCHEDULE/RESULTS GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS ST. OLAF DATE OPPONENT TIME/RESULT COLLEGE COLLEGE 11/20 UW-RIVER FALLS W 77-56 “Golden Gusties” “Oles” 11/23 UM-Morris W 70-38 5-2, 2-2 MIAC 5-2, 3-1 MIAC 11/30 UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN W 75-53 12/4 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY* W 75-66 Game 8 12/7 CONCORDIA COLLEGE* L 47-70 Game Information 12/11 COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT* L 73-76 12/21 Augsburg College* W 66-51 DATE: Saturday, January 4 1/4 St. Olaf College* 3:00 p.m. TIME: 1:00 p.m. 1/6 MACALESTER COLLEGE* 7:30 p.m. SITE: Northfield, Minnesota 1/8 Bethel University* 7:30 p.m. VENUE: Skoglund Center: Bob Gelle Court 1/11 CARLETON COLLEGE* (Alumnae Day) 1:00 p.m. WEB VIDEO: http://client.stretchinternet.com/client/stolaf.portal 1/15 UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS* 7:30 p.m. LIVE STATS: http://client.stretchinternet.com/client/stolaf.portal 1/18 Saint Mary’s University* 1:30 p.m. SETTING THE SCENE 1/20 ST. CATHERINE UNIVERSITY* 7:30 p.m. • The Gustavus Adolphus women’s basketball team will kick off 2014 with a road test 1/22 Hamline University* 7:30 p.m. against the Oles of St. Olaf College on Saturday afternoon at 1:00 p.m. on Bob Gelle Court. 1/25 Concordia College* 1:30 p.m. Gustavus enters Saturday’s game at 5-2 overall and 2-2 in the MIAC, while St.
    [Show full text]
  • Colleges & Universities
    Bishop Watterson High School Students Have Been Accepted at These Colleges and Universities Art Institute of Chicago Fordham University Adrian College University of Cincinnati Franciscan University of Steubenville University of Akron Cincinnati Art Institute Franklin and Marshall College University of Alabama The Citadel Franklin University Albion College Claremont McKenna College Furman University Albertus Magnus College Clemson University Gannon University Allegheny College Cleveland Inst. Of Art George Mason University Alma College Cleveland State University George Washington University American Academy of Dramatic Arts Coastal Carolina University Georgetown University American University College of Charleston Georgia Southern University Amherst College University of Colorado at Boulder Georgia Institute of Technology Anderson University (IN) Colorado College University of Georgia Antioch College Colorado State University Gettysburg College Arizona State University Colorado School of Mines Goshen College University of Arizona Columbia College (Chicago) Grinnell College (IA) University of Arkansas Columbia University Hampshire College (MA) Art Academy of Cincinnati Columbus College of Art & Design Hamilton College The Art Institute of California-Hollywood Columbus State Community College Hampton University Ashland University Converse College (SC) Hanover College (IN) Assumption College Cornell University Hamilton College Augustana College Creighton University Harvard University Aurora University University of the Cumberlands Haverford
    [Show full text]
  • One Fish Or NO Fish? the Dating Experience, St. Olaf College Style Jacob Barclay
    One Fish or NO fish? The Dating Experience, St. Olaf College Style Jacob Barclay Abstract The purpose of this study was to come to a better understanding of the various dating experiences and patterns on the campus of St. Olaf College. In addition, a student-defined paradigm of the concept of dating was sought out and compared with definitions from past research. Through qualitative research, patterns, attitudes and behaviors are revealed. Using persons of different ages, gender, and sexual orientation was crucial to the representation of this study. After conducting fifteen interviews, it can be determined that casual dating in the sense of several noncommittal relationships is a rare occurrence at St. Olaf. Students are heavily influenced by the physical proximity and mental framework St. Olaf College creates and seem to defy the larger social context of casual dating on college campuses. Setting/Community In order to understand the various dating experiences that will be discussed later in this study, it is crucial to explain the context in which these experiences exist. Collectively, the experiences of each student are affected in one or several factors related to the location and setting of St. Olaf College. St. Olaf College is a private, Lutheran-affiliated four-year educational institution situated on a massive hill in the midst of dozens of cornfields. Located in Northfield, Minnesota, St. Olaf College is about forty minutes south of Minneapolis and St. Paul, two large metropolitan areas. Northfield has a population close to 15,000 people with both of its colleges, St. Olaf and Carleton College in session.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2016 College Acceptance List Appalachian State University
    Class of 2016 College Acceptance List Appalachian State University (1) Howard University (1) The University of North Carolina at Auburn University - 1 (7) Indiana University at Bloomington (1) Chapel Hill (1) Bradley University (1) Lehigh University (1) University of California, Davis - 1 (2) Brown University - 1 (1) Limestone College (2) University of California, Irvine (1) Bryn Mawr College - 1 (1) Louisiana State University (1) University of California, Santa Cruz (1) Carleton College - 1 (1) Methodist University (1) University of Florida (1) Chapman University (1) Middlebury College (2) University of Mississippi (2) Charleston Southern University (1) Midlands Technical College - 1 (1) University of Missouri Kansas City (1) Claflin University - 1 (2) Mississippi State University - 1 (1) University of North Carolina Clemson University - 6 (16) Morehouse College (2) at Asheville (1) Coastal Carolina University - 1 (6) Newberry College (1) University of Notre Dame - 1 (1) College of Charleston - 3 (14) North Carolina State University (1) University of Richmond (2) Davidson College (1) Northeastern University (1) University of South Alabama (1) Drew University (1) Presbyterian College - 1 (4) University of South Carolina - 10 (25) Duke University - 1 (1) Purdue University (1) University of Southern California (1) East Tennessee State University (2) Queens University of Charlotte (1) University of St Andrews (1) Eckerd College (1) Rhodes College (2) University of Tennessee, Knoxville (2) Elon University (2) Rutgers University-New Brunswick
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Boundaries: Collaborating to Assess Information Literacy [AAC&U Conference]
    Carleton College Carleton Digital Commons Staff and Faculty Work Laurence McKinley Gould Library 2006 Crossing Boundaries: Collaborating to Assess Information Literacy [AAC&U Conference] Carolyn Sanford Carleton College Jackie Lauer-Glebov Carleton College, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment David Lopatto Grinnell College Jo Beld St. Olaf College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.carleton.edu/libr_staff_faculty Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Sanford, Carolyn, Jackie Lauer-Glebov, David Lopatto, and Jo Beld. 2006. "Crossing Boundaries: Collaborating to Assess Information Literacy [AAC&U Conference]." Accessed via Staff and Faculty Work. Library. Carleton Digital Commons https://digitalcommons.carleton.edu/libr_staff_faculty/12 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Laurence McKinley Gould Library at Carleton Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Staff and Faculty Work by an authorized administrator of Carleton Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. St. Olaf Macalester Carleton Grinnell Lake Forest University of Chicago Ohio Wesleyan DePauw Crossing Boundaries: Collaborating to Assess Information Literacy AAC&U Conference: Assessing General Education and Outcomes That Matter in a Changing World Phoenix March 9-11, 2006 St. Olaf Macalester Carleton Grinnell Lake Forest University of Chicago Ohio Wesleyan DePauw Panelists • Carolyn Sanford Head of Reference & Instruction Carleton College, Northfield, MN • Jackie Lauer-Glebov Assistant Director of Institutional Research and the Coordinator of Educational Assessment Carleton College, Northfield, MN • David Lopatto Professor of Psychology Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA • Jo Beld Professor of Political Science, Director of Academic Research & Planning St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN St.
    [Show full text]