Applied Visualization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VOLUME 38, NUMBER 3 MAY/JUNE 2018 Applied Visualization www.computer.org/cga May/June 2018 Vol. 38, No. 3 www.computer.org/cga TABLE OF CONTENTS Applied Visualization 73 Toward a Multimodal Diagnostic Exploratory Visualization of 30 GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTION Focal Cortical Dysplasia Applied Visualization Shin-Ting Wu, Raphael Voltoline, Wallace Loos, José Angel Iván Rubianes Silva, Lionis Bernd Hentschel, Miriah Meyer, Hans Hagen, and Watanabe, Bárbara Amorim, Ana Coan, Ross Maciejewski Fernando Cendes, and Clarissa L. Yasuda 33 Belle2VR: A Virtual-Reality 90 Application-Driven Design: Help Visualization of Subatomic Particle Students Understand Physics in the Belle II Experiment Employment and See the “Big Zach Duer, Leo Piilonen, and George Glasson Picture” 44 OpenSpace: Changing the Li Liu, Deborah Silver, and Karen Bemis Narrative of Public Dissemination in Astronomical Visualization from Feature Articles What to How 106 Alexander Bock, Emil Axelsson, Carter Emmart, 2016 IEEE Scientific Masha Kuznetsova, Charles Hansen, and Anders Visualization Contest Winner: Ynnerman Visual and Structural Analysis of Point-based Simulation 58 Management of Cerebral Aneurysm Descriptors based on an Ensembles Patrick Gralka, Sebastian Grottel, Joachim Staib, Automatic Ostium Extraction Karsten Schatz, Grzegorz Karch, Manuel Monique Meuschke, Tobias Günther, Ralph Hirschler, Michael Krone, Guido Reina, Stefan Wickenhöfer, Markus Gross, Bernhard Preim, and Gumhold, and Thomas Ertl Kai Lawonn Columns and Departments 131 APPLICATIONS 4D Cubism: Modeling, 5 ABOUT THE COVER Animation, and Fabrication of Alchemical Transformation Artistic Shapes Gary Singh Quentin Corker-Marin, Alexander Pasko, and Valery Adzhiev ART ON GRAPHICS 8 GRAPHICALLY SPEAKING Sally Weber: Making Art from 140 Light Insights by Visual Comparison: Sally Weber, Bruce Campbell, and Francesca Samsel The State and Challenges Tatiana von Landesberger EDUCATION 13 IN MEMORIAM Exploranation: A New Science 150 Communication Paradigm Remembering Georges Anders Ynnerman, Jonas Löwgren, and Lena Tibell Grinstein Haim Levkowitz, John T. Fallon, José L. 21 VISUALIZATION VIEWPOINTS Encarnação, Catherine Plaisant, Jean Scholtz, Observations and Reflections on Mark Whiting, Kris Cook, Daniel Keim, and Theresa-Marie Rhyne Visualization Literacy in Elementary School Fanny Chevalier, Nathalie Henry Riche, Basak Alper, Catherine Plaisant, Jeremy Boy, and Niklas Elmqvist Also in This Issue 119 DISSERTATION IMPACT On Dynamic Scheduling for the 4 Masthead GPU and its Applications in IEEE Computer Society Info Computer Graphics and Beyond 118 Markus Steinberger For more information on computing topics, visit the Computer Society Digital Library at www.computer.org/csdl. ISSN: 0272-1716 Published by the IEEE Computer Society DEPARTMENT: Visualization Viewpoints Observations and Reflections on Visualization Literacy in Elementary School Fanny Chevalier In this article, we share our reflections on University of Toronto visualization literacy and how it might be better Nathalie Henry Riche developed in early education. We base this on Microsoft Research lessons we learned while studying how teachers Basak Alper Jet Propulsion Lab, NASA instruct, and how students acquire basic visualization Catherine Plaisant principles and skills in elementary school. We use University of Maryland these findings to propose directions for future Jeremy Boy research on visualization literacy. UN Global Pulse Niklas Elmqvist University of Maryland Visualization literacy is generally understood as “the abil- ity and skill to read and interpret visually represented data and to extract information from data visualizations.”1 Re- cently, it has become a central topic of discussion and research in the information visualization (infovis) community, as several works have shown that people can initially struggle to confi- dently extract information from graphics,2 or that they may not feel comfortable enough even with the most basic charts to prefer them over other media like text for simple data detection tasks.3 Academic efforts attempt to address and document this latent problem, referred to as visu- alization illiteracy.1,2,4,5 IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications Published by the IEEE Computer Society May/June 2018 21 0272-1716/18/$33.00 USD ©2018 IEEE IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS Figure 1. C'est la Vis is a tablet-based technology probe we co-designed with elementary teachers to support the teaching and learning of pictographs and bar charts in grades K-4, by revealing the relationships between concrete (i.e. set of elements) and more abstract (i.e. bar chart) representations of the same data. Our approach has been to explore how basic visualization principles and skills are taught, and learned at elementary school in the United States6 (see Figure 1). Here, we discuss three teaching paradoxes we identified, and the controversial role of technology in early education. We find these thought-provoking, and important to bring to the light of the infovis community, as they inspire a deeper reflection on the concept and definition of visualization literacy. This article serves as a first step towards reconciling efforts in infovis research with those of other disci- plines, while pursuing the overarching goal of improving visualization literacy levels of genera- tions to come. THE IMPORTANCE OF VISUALIZATION LITERACY It is both an exciting and daunting time for infovis research. Visual representations of data are omnipresent: people are routinely exposed to infographics online; news outlets enrich their arti- cles with more and more data graphics; and both for-profit and non-profit organizations alike in- creasingly use visualizations to present success or progress data to stakeholders. Yet, despite this exposure, readers seem to not systematically consider visually presented information when it is accompanied by other media like text (to which they may be more accustomed), nor do they al- ways spend the necessary time, or take the necessary precautions to interpret graphics correctly. They may enjoy a visualization for its aesthetic qualities, but completely oversee its meaning, or they may over-confidently rely on their visual judgment when estimating trends, even though these may have purposefully been visually inflated.5,7,8 The use of visual metaphors may also be prone to misinterpretation, or to manipulation by design (Figure 2). The bottom line is that decoding and understanding visualizations is a complex, multi-level ac- tivity requiring knowledge and skill that a significant portion of the population lacks. As infovis researchers, we believe it is our obligation to address this issue by providing the evidence to overcome the general belief that interpreting data graphics is an inherent and trivial skill. For ex- ample, while the idiom “a picture is worth a thousand words” conveys the idea that a visual de- piction can communicate a complex message more effectively than text, it also alludes to a persistent myth that pictures are always easier to understand than words. This misconception can lead to grave miscomprehension of information, as well as to important miscommunication. Figure 2. Several design issues can complicate or impede the correct interpretation of data graphics. (a) Use of nonstandard conventions; (b) use of uncommon conventions; (c) effects of perceptual bias (in this case larger geographical units overshadow other smaller regions); and (d) use of visual metaphors that may be deceiving. May/June 2018 22 www.computer.org/cga VISUALIZATION VIEWPOINTS VISUALIZATION LITERACY IN EARLY EDUCATION Our work has focused on what happens in the early stages of education: what do children learn about visual representations of data at elementary school? And how are they taught the princi- ples and skills required to interpret and create visualizations?6 We have amassed a rich set of empirical data from diverse sources, which we have compiled in a 2017 article on visualization literacy at elementary school.6 In this work, we created and analyzed a corpus of pedagogical artifacts to assess the types of, and to which extent visualizations are taught at elementary school. We curated and classified 2,600 data-driven graphics (out of about 5,000 visuals spread throughout 1,500 pages of con- tent), which we found in a collection of textbooks for grades K–4. We also gathered data from teachers to assess their pedagogic strategies. We conducted a survey with 16 teachers (grades K–4) to understand how much they rely on visual materials in class, and whether they perceive visualization as an important pedagogical tool. We also conducted partici- patory design sessions and focus groups with eight teachers to collect input on the way they de- sign teaching materials. Finally, we developed C’est la vis (Figure 2), a tablet-based technology probe that aims to sup- port the teaching and learning of pictographs and bar charts, which we deployed in two class- rooms (grades K and 2) to assess what children know about basic visualization principles, and how they learn them. Using this tool, we conducted multiple observation sessions, during which a total of 21 students used the probe in small groups (pairs or triples), each on their own tablet device. We were able to observe the class dynamics, as well as a variety of other activities that went on. Building on this, we focus on sharing the broader insights we gained from our immersion in the classroom environment while working closely with educators, and observing