A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption the David Hinkson Story

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption the David Hinkson Story A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption The David Hinkson Story An appeal to the world court of public opinion. When any government agency is empowered to manufacture, subvert and perjure evidence with impunity, the truth becomes immaterial. Roland Hinkson November 21, 2010 i A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................ii Copyright ©2010, Roland C. Hinkson, Ouray, Colorado FOREWORD by wesley w. hoyt................................................... iv Forward this book as you wish. I grant permission to circulate the written version of this book in full among private individuals and groups, post it on all PREFACE by roland c. hinkson .................................................... x Internet sites and publish in all not-for-profit publications. I encourage any, and all, radio, Internet and television hosts to use it freely, but, in context. Use of any part of ONE the jury is coming in............................................................ 12 this work out of context is strictly prohibited. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved. TWO david in the hands of the marshal.................................... 14 Subject to sections 107 through 120, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: THREE conditions at ada county jail......................................... 17 (1) To reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonographic records; (2) To prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; FOUR the chief accuser testifies at trial .................................... 19 (3) To distribute copies or phonographic records of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; FIVE the judge locks up david and throws away the key.......... 23 (4) In the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, perform the SIX the count of monte cristo goes to his dungeon.................... 25 copyrighted work publicly; (5) In the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, SEVEN ten-thousand tears......................................................... 26 pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual EIGHT a letter from hell............................................................. 29 images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and NINE letter to the adx warden ................................................... 32 (6) In the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission. TEN from my diary ..................................................................... 34 Disclaimer - The posting of the stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) in this book does not in any way, shape or form, ELEVEN david hits the jackpot, finally ...................................... 37 implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of the misconduct herein. The documents speak for themselves and the misconduct is self TWELVE swisher's blackmail begins......................................... 39 evident from an understanding of the entire case and should not be taken out of context. THIRTEEN who is this guy swisher? ......................................... 40 FOURTEEN how and when did this all begin? .......................... 42 FIFTEEN albers expands his intrigue ........................................ 44 SIXTEEN other employee betrayers .......................................... 48 SEVENTEEN gunderson and his coconspirators....................... 50 EIGHTEEN gunderson plot revealed ......................................... 53 NINETEEN the plot thickens...................................................... 56 TWENTY implementation of the gunderson plan..................... 61 TWENTY-ONE the setup–j.c. harding wired............................. 64 ii A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption TWENTY-TWO let's try to mitigate our anger.........................67 FORTY-SIX seventeen-thousand korean war vets speak out . 145 TWENTY-THREE memorandum to the national marine corps league FORTY-SEVEN better to destroy one man than to retry subsequent .......................................................................................................69 cases ............................................................................................ 147 TWENTY-FOUR daughter describes swisher as a sociopath ...75 FORTY-EIGHT a panoramic review........................................ 150 TWENTY-FIVE swisher gets convicted......................................77 FORTY-NINE roland's opinion ................................................ 154 TWENTY-SIX swisher's tall tales of his heroism.......................82 FIFTY conclusion...................................................................... 158 TWENTY-SEVEN be careful whom you trust............................87 INDEX .......................................Error! Bookmark not defined.16 TWENTY-EIGHT bellon takes wateroz to court.......................91 TWENTY-NINE why feds dumped raff, their first star witness 95 THIRTY our hope to enlist a top appellate attorney ................99 THIRTY-ONE riordan says, "I'll take the case.........................102 THIRTY-TWO government's crimes and recommended punishment .....................................................................................................104 THIRTY-THREE wes hoyt views the panorama .....................106 THIRTY-FOUR are the cowards the ones quick to judge?......109 THIRTY-FIVE idaho congressman george hansen– chained and thrown into prison .....................................................................110 THIRTY-SIX traficant survives the judicial cesspool..............113 THIRTY-SEVEN dungeons in america ....................................116 THIRTY-EIGHT the rewards of "testilying"............................120 THIRTY-NINE do prosecutors and judges get paid? ...............123 FORTY the u.s. constitution vs targeted individuals ...............126 FORTY-ONE 3 judge panel of the ninth circuit court of appeals128 FORTY-TWO 11 judge en banc appeal ...................................133 FORTY-THREE the en banc court overturns the appellate court135 FORTY-FOUR legal reporter levine on en banc decision..............138 FORTY-FIVE judge fletcher on the en banc decision ..............139 iii A Cesspool of Judicial Corruption collaborating government and foreign private interests to transform this FOREWORD by wesley w. hoyt country into a police state. The Presumption of Innocence is the fundamental right, at the Another technique used in transforming this nation from a free state foundation of all personal freedoms in America which embodies the into a police state, is the attack on the innocent; those “politically concept “it is better to free ten guilty men than to convict one who is incorrect” people willing to speak out against tyranny and corruption. innocent.” Against them the government uses false charges, manufactured by rogue For the last 30 years, the government has been using various government agents on behalf of the elite who deem themselves to be techniques to replace basic, God-given Constitutional rights, such as the “politically correct;” i.e., the NWO movement. Presumption-of-Innocence, with various legal devices, such as the “They,” these rogue agents and the prosecutors and judges who “Presumption of Governmental Regularity and Correctness An example support them, deliberately attack innocent individuals who criticize the of how this device is used is that judges proclaim they will “always believe NWO movement simply because of differing views of how governmental the government witness over the accused” (in situations where all other authority should be administered, managed and applied. factors are equal). Judges who follow the Presumption of Government The tie-that-binds these entities is a form of peer pressure mixed with Regularity and Correctness consider only the government’s witness to be legalized bribery that encourages government employees to stick together, an accurate reporter of events and consider the citizen not believable; causing judges, prosecutors and government agents to feel obligated to hence, the evisceration of the Presumption of Innocence. support each other, even if their conscience tells them that they are There are case law rulings creating this abomination of justice, which prosecuting an innocent person on false charges. is contrary to the U.S. Constitution. What should happen under our Legalized bribery comes in the form of “cash awards” for government Constitution is, when only the word of a citizen is pitted against the employees from $10,000 to $25,000 per conviction to “recognize and testimony of a government witness, without corroborating evidence, the reward” each official under 5 USC §§ 4502, 4503 & 4504 and 5 USC §4302 Presumption of Innocence REQUIRES that judges accept the statements of to enhance their “performance” or for so-called “superior the accused as true. But this new device allows the judge to base his accomplishment” or “a special act or service” or if the act “achieves a decision on something other than fundamental constitutional principles significant reduction in paperwork.” The criteria is so loose, any employee and to arbitrarily
Recommended publications
  • The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 83 Issue 4 Article 11 Fall 2008 Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Lazos Vargas, Sylvia R. (2008) "Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 83 : Iss. 4 , Article 11. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol83/iss4/11 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench SYLVIA R. LAZOS VARGAS* INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1423 I. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE JUDICIARY FROM DIVERSITY? ....... .. .. .. .. 1426 A . D escriptive Diversity ........................................................................ 1428 B. Sym bolic D iversity............................................................................ 1430 C. Viewpoint D iversity .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report
    NINTH CIRCUIT United States Courts 2006 Annual Report 2006 Annual Report Cover.indd 3 08/20/2007 8:55:02 AM Above: Text mural of Article III of the United States Constitution located at the Wayne Lyman Morse Courthouse in Eugene, Oregon. Cover Image: San Francisco courtroom mosaic depicting Justice with Science, Literature and the Arts The Offi ce of the Circuit Executive would like to acknowledge the following for their contributions to the 2006 Annual Report: Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder Clerk of Court Cathy Catterson Chief Pretrial Services Offi cer George Walker Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Clerk Harold Marenus 2006 Annual Report Cover.indd 4 08/20/2007 8:55:04 AM Table of Contents Ninth Circuit Overview 2 Judicial Council Mission Statement 3 Foreword by Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder 5 Ninth Circuit Overview 6 Judicial Council and Administration 8 Organization of Judicial Council Committees Judicial Transitions 10 New Judges 13 New Senior Judges 14 In Memoriam Ninth Circuit Highlights 16 Judicial Council Committees 19 2006 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference 21 Conference Award Presentations 23 Devitt Award Presentation 25 Documentary Film Inspires Law Day Program 26 Ideas Set Forth for Managing Immigration Caseload 28 2006 National Gang Symposium Space and Facilities 30 Eugene Courthouse Dedicated 30 Space and Security Committee 33 Courthouses in Design Phase The Work of the Courts 36 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 39 District Courts 43 Bankruptcy Courts 45 Bankruptcy Appellate Panel 47 Magistrate Judge Matters 49 Federal Public Defenders 51 Probation Offi ces 53 Pretrial Services Offi ces 55 District by District Caseloads (All statistics provided by the Administrative Offi ce of the United States Courts) 2006 Annual Report Final.indd Sec1:1 08/20/2007 8:49:04 AM The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit Annual Report 2006 Seated, from left: Chief District Judge Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2005 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was a relationship with You through Your church in Pueblo, Colorado, one of that called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Son Jesus, for it is in Jesus’ name we State’s most under-reached areas. With pore (Ms. CAPITO). pray. Amen. his trademark enthusiasm and commit- f f ment to the Lord, he initiated several other church plants, including Fellow- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER THE JOURNAL PRO TEMPORE ship of the Rockies in Colorado The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Springs. He then went to Florida to The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Chair has examined the Journal of the Merit Island, and now serves as the fore the House the following commu- last day’s proceedings and announces senior pastor of Westside Church in nication from the Speaker: to the House her approval thereof. Omaha, Nebraska, where my family WASHINGTON, DC, Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- and I attend. April 13, 2005. nal stands approved. Dr. Dodd is also an accomplished au- I hereby appoint the Honorable SHELLY MOORE CAPITO to act as Speaker pro tempore f thor of three books: Add One to Grow on this day. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE On; Hearts on Fire—the Keys to Dy- J. DENNIS HASTERT, namic Church Growth; and Running on Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailblazers and Those That Followed : Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Faculty Scholarship 9-2015 Trailblazers and those that followed : personal experiences, gender, and judicial empathy. Laura P. Moyer University of Louisville, [email protected] Susan B. Haire Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty Part of the American Politics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Original Publication Information This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Moyer, Laura P. and Susan Haire. "Trailblazers and Those That Followed: Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy." 2015. Law and Society Review 49(3): 665-689. which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12150. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trailblazers and Those That Followed: Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy Laura P. Moyer University of Louisville Susan B. Haire University of Georgia Version: May 6, 2015 Abstract This paper investigates one causal mechanism that may explain why female judges on the federal appellate courts are more likely than men to side with plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases. To test whether personal experiences with inequality are related to empathetic responses to the claims of female plaintiffs, we focus on the first wave of female judges, who attended law school during a time of severe gender inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2017
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons Emeriti Newsletter: "...Of Cabbages and Kings" University Newsletters 11-2017 November 2017 Emeriti Society, University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/emeriti-news Recommended Citation Emeriti Society, University of the Pacific, "November 2017" (2017). Emeriti Newsletter: "...Of Cabbages and Kings". 15. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/emeriti-news/15 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the University Newsletters at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emeriti Newsletter: "...Of Cabbages and Kings" by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “. of Cabbages and Kings” Newsletter of the University of the Pacific Emeriti Society November 2017 I. Recent Events 1. Fall Luncheon—Judy On Thursday, October 26th, approximately 55 members of the Emeriti Society gathered at the Alumni House for the Fall Luncheon. The event began at 10:00 with coffee and conversation. At 11:00 Bill Topp began the program with a brief review of Emeriti activities before introducing our speaker, Dr. Lydia Fox, Professor of Geological and Environmental Sciences and Director of Undergraduate Research. Her topic was “Water and the California Delta: Past, Present and Future.” Lydia’s talk was highly informative and she wove the numerous strands of her complex topic into a fascinating portrait of the area we have all called home at one point or another. In the Q & A session that followed, Lydia proved herself to be not only an ‘informed scholar,’ but one who can talk ‘informally’ about her topic for hours in an engaging language that doesn’t fly over the heads of her audience! Lunch was served following the enthusiastic applause of these appreciative listeners.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Nominations President Bush's Confirmed Judicial
    http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/nominations/index.html Judicial Nominations "The Constitution requires that the President seek the Senate’s advice and consent in making appointments to the federal courts. As a senator and as the Democratic leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I take this responsibility very seriously." -- Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee 316 Of President Bush's Article III Judicial Nominees Have Been Confirmed. (As of September 29, 2008) Read a complete list of President Bush's confirmed nominees. http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/nominations/confirmednominees.htm President Bush's Confirmed Judicial Nominations Court of Supreme Court Circuit Court District Court International Nominees Nominees Nominees Trade As of September 29, 2008 Supreme Court Nominees 2. Samuel A. Alito, Associate Justice, Jan. 31, 2006 1. John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Sept. 29, 2005 (vote (vote 58-42) 78-22) Circuit Court Nominees 61. Raymond Kethledge, 6th Circuit, June 24, 31. Franklin van Antwerpen, 3rd Circuit, May 20, 2008 (voice vote) 2004 (vote 96-0)30. D. Michael Fisher, 3rd Circuit, 60. Helene N. White, 6th Circuit, June 24, 2008 Dec. 9, 2003 (voice vote) (vote 63-32) 29. Carlos Bea, 9th Circuit, Sept. 29, 2003 (vote 59. G. Steven Agee, 4th Circuit, May 20, 2008 86-0) (vote 96-0) 28. Steven Colloton, 8th Circuit, Sept. 4, 2003 58. Catharina Haynes, 5th Circuit, April 10, 2008 (vote 94-1) (unanimous consent) 27. Allyson K. Duncan, 4th Circuit, July 17, 2003 57. John Daniel Tinder, 7th Circuit, December 18, (vote 93-0) 2007(vote 93-0) 26. Richard Wesley, 2nd Circuit, June 11, 2003 56.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Alarms Or Smoke Detectors: the Role of Interest Groups in Confirmation of United States Courts of Appeals Judges
    FIRE ALARMS OR SMOKE DETECTORS: THE ROLE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN CONFIRMATION OF UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS JUDGES By DONALD E. CAMPBELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Donald E. Campbell To Ken and JJ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It took Leo Tolstoy six years to write War and Peace. It has taken me twice that long to complete this dissertation, and I am certain I required much more support throughout the process than Tolstoy. I begin my acknowledgements with Dr. Marcus Hendershot. In short, this dissertation would not have been possible without Marc’s guidance, advice, and prodding. Every aspect of this dissertation has Marc’s imprint on it in some way. I cannot imagine the amount of time that he spent providing comments and suggestions. I will forever be in his debt and gratitude. I also want to thank the other members of my dissertation committee. Dr. Lawrence Dodd, the chair, has been a steadying force in my graduate school life since (literally) the first day I stepped in the door of Anderson Hall. His advice and encouragement will never be forgotten. The other members of my committee–Dr. Beth Rosenson, Dr. David Hedge, and Professor Danaya Wright (University of Florida School of Law)–have been more than understanding as the months dragged into years of getting the dissertation finalized. No one could ask for a better or more understanding dissertation committee. There are also several individuals outside of the University of Florida that I owe acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civility in Lawyers' Writing
    Across the The Official publication of the Third Quarter 2015 San Joaquin County Bar Association Civility in Lawyers’ Writing Pg. 6 Also In This Issue: » 2016 MCLE Masters Series Pg. 34 » An Uber-important Question: Independent Contractor or Employee? Pg. 13 » Healing the Psychological Wounds of Divorce Pg. 23 » Under Oath: Cathy Huston Pg. 29 » 2015 Retrospective The San Joaquin County Bar Association San Joaquin county Bar Association Board of Governors and San Joaquin County Bar Foundation Board of Directors Moses Zapien..............................President James Morris...............................President-Elect Allan Jose....................................Past President Erin Guy Castillo.........................Secretary Nelson Bahler Lisa Miles Fugazi 20 North Sutter Street, Suite 300 Michael C. Belden Cheryl R. Jacobsen Stockton, CA 95202 Mia S. Brown Allison Lafferty (209) 948-0125 Alan Coon Zoey Merrill Fax: (209) 948-1361 Jenny D. Dennis Clifford W. Stevens www.sjcbar.org San Joaquin County Bar Association ACROSS THE BAR COMMITTEE MEMBERS Rebekah Burr-Siegel, Michael R. Tener....................... Editor/Chair Executive Director [email protected] Janette Rossell Fernanda Pereira Mario Padron, Terry Costa Joseph Ferraro CAC [email protected] Scott Rooker Ricardo Aranda Linda Mussat, Clifford Stevens Rebekah Burr-Siegel CAC Coordinator/ Deputy [email protected] Dru Hunt Natalie Vernon Jennifer Riggs, MCLE [email protected] Fatima Ruelas, To contact us via email - [email protected] LRS [email protected] Natalie Vernon, Across the Bar is published quarterly by the Communications [email protected] SJCBA. Subscription rate is included in LRS...............................................LRSRequest@sjcbar.org membership dues, or $50 per year for non-members. Across the Bar welcomes letters and article suggestions • from readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5422
    S5422 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE April 28, 2003 where he can raise issues of federalism does not specifically recall these re- make my concerns known. This is one or that will affect local and state gov- marks and that, in the ones he recalls, of those times. In his selection of Mr. ernment interests. And his federalism he was constrained to argue the posi- Sutton for the Sixth Circuit, the Presi- practice boomed as he actively pursued tions that he argued on behalf of his dent and his advisors are attempting to cases attractive to his ideology and clients. As far as I know, no one forced skew its decisions out of step with the through his contacts among the mem- Mr. Sutton to write any article, and mainstream and in favor of States’ bers of the Federalist Society. In an- most lawyers are certainly more care- rights over civil rights, anachronistic swer to my follow-up questions, Mr. ful than to attribute their name to any ideas over people. Sutton admitted that he had taken no paper that professes a view with which The Sixth Circuit is one on which case in which he argued against a state they strongly disagree. In my view, Mr. Senate Republicans stalled three nomi- claiming immunity from suit under the Sutton’s suggestions that he does not nees of President Clinton during his Eleventh Amendment. Despite his prot- personally believe what he has written last four years in office. They closed estation that he might argue either are intellectually dishonest, insincere and locked the gates to this court in side of any case, it must certainly be and misleading.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 US COURT of APPEALS for the NINTH CIRCUIT Judicial Profile
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Judicial Profile: Carlos Bea COURT: Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals APPOINTED: 2003, by President George W. Bush BORN: April 18, 1934 LAW SCHOOL: Stanford Law School PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE: San Francisco Superior Court Bench, 1990-2003 After long wait, Bea ascends federal bench Jason Hoppin The Recorder November 18, 2003 Carlos Bea can breathe a little bit easier now. Not only are his chambers in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals much larger than his old haunt at the San Francisco Superior Court, but he no longer has to wonder what kind of federal judge he'd have made. He's about to find out. The longtime litigator and dedicated Republican had been on the superior court a little more than a year when the first President Bush tapped him for the Northern District federal bench. His nomination died without a hearing, however, and Bea waited a decade before being offered his current post. The former Olympian is still fit at 69 years old. The white hair, dark complexion and crisp shirts project the dignity of an ambassador. Bea seems to fit right in at the beaux-arts Ninth Circuit headquarters on Seventh and Mission streets. His enormous office is decorated with paintings from his personal collection -- portraits and scenes painted in a classical style. Weathered antiques have been imported in a feeble attempt to fill the cavernous space. On the superior court, Bea required decorum in the courtroom. Some lawyers say he can come across as imperious.
    [Show full text]