DOCSLIB.ORG

February 21, 2019 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Jennifer E. Pelzman Manager, Legal Support Federal Regulatory and Legal Affairs 1300 I Street, N.W. Suite 500 East Washington, DC 20005 Phone 202.515.2463 [email protected] February 21, 2019 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street S.W. Washington, DC 20554 Re: Verizon Public Notice of Network Changes and Certification Under Rules 51.325 - 51.335 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Sections 51.325-51.335 of the Commission’s rules, Verizon submits the attached Certification of Public Notice of Network Change under rule 51.329(a), Short Term Public Notice under rule 51.333(a), and Certification of Short Term Public Notice under rule 51.333(a). Specifically, Verizon is providing notification of the network changes that result in the decommissioning of the Dormont, PA 5ESS switch (DRMTPADODS0) located at 3151 Pioneer Ave., Dormont, PA 15216. Please contact me should you need any further information. Sincerely, CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC NOTICE(s) OF NETWORK CHANGE UNDER RULE 51.329(a) On February 13, 2019 the following Public Notice of Network Change has been made by Verizon pursuant to Code of Federal Regulation 47, Subsections 51.325 – 51.335. The Public Notice(s) can also be obtained at the Internet at: https://www.verizon.com/about/terms-conditions/network-disclosures Title(s) of Network Notification(s): Planned Network Changes – Dormont, PA switch retirement Michael Warnken Michael Warnken Specialist – Communications Verizon Partner Solutions Telephone – (631) 569-3318 Date: February 13, 2019 6929 N. Lakewood Avenue Tulsa, OK 74117 SHORT TERM PUBLIC NOTICE OF NETWORK CHANGE UNDER RULE 51.333(a) February 13, 2019 Carrier: Verizon Pennsylvania LLC, 900 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Contact: For additional information on these planned network changes, please contact: Lisa Thompson Global Data Network Engineering Verizon Wireline Network Operations 13100 Columbia Pike, Floor 5 Room 505 Silver Spring, MD 20904 443-862-0212 John Dunne Senior Manager – Global Data Network Engineering Verizon Wireline Network Operations 2147 Route 27 Edison, NJ 08817 732-593-4003 Implementation Date: On or after August 3, 2019 Planned Network Change(s) will occur at the following locations in Pennsylvania: Verizon Central Office Address CLLI 3151 Pioneer Ave., DORMONT PA 5ESS Switch DRMTPADODS0 Dormont, PA 15216 530 N. Neville St., OAKLAND PA CS2K Switch PITBPAOKPS0 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 This notice may also be viewed at http://www.verizon.com/about/terms-conditions/network- disclosures. PLEASE NOTE: All references to the Dormont PA 5ESS switch are associated with CLLI code DRMTPADODS0 and will not be repeated throughout this notice. All references to the Oakland PA CS2K switch are associated with CLLI code PITBPAOKPS0 and will not be repeated throughout this notice. Description of the Planned Network Change(s): The Verizon Dormont PA 5ESS switch located at 3151 Pioneer Ave., Dormont, PA 15216, will be retired and removed from the network after all traffic served by this switch is migrated to the Verizon Oakland PA CS2K switch located at 530 N. Neville St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. All traffic to be migrated includes, but is not limited to, Inter-LATA (ACCESS/FG-B- D/CLEC/IXC), wireless, and paging traffic. Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Impact(s) of the Planned Change(s): Competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), interexchange carriers (IXCs, IECs), wireless carriers, and paging carriers will need to secure new trunk groups built to the Oakland PA CS2K switch or have existing trunk groups to that switch augmented. Carriers that are code holders for access connectivity in the Dormont PA 5ESS switch will be required to reposition the codes to the Oakland PA CS2K switch. All ASRs for the Oakland PA CS2K switch must be received no later than July 8, 2019 in order to provide sufficient time to migrate the traffic described above. These direct end office trunk (DEOT) interconnections will support traffic migration for the Dormont PA 5ESS switch prior to its eventual decommissioning. Local Exchange Routing Guide (LERG) change effective dates will be posted prior to decommissioning of the Dormont PA 5ESS switch (on or after August 3, 2019). This will serve to guide interconnect re-routes of traffic for the ten (10) native codes currently served by the Dormont PA 5ESS switch to reflect the Oakland PA CS2K switch as the new home switch. All ASRs for the Oakland PA CS2K switch must carry the project code of DRMTPADORP1. CERTIFICATION OF SHORT TERM PUBLIC NOTICE UNDER RULE 51.333(a) I, Melissa Hefley, do hereby certify that on February 13, 2019 (a minimum of five business days prior to filing), I caused the Verizon Public Notice listed on the attached Short Term Public Notice of Network Change to be served via FedEx or U.S. Mail at the other service providers’ preference, upon each known provider of telephone exchange service that interconnects directly with Verizon in the applicable area(s). Attached are the names and addresses of those providers who were served. The Public Notice(s) can also be obtained at the Internet at: https://www.verizon.com/about/terms-conditions/network-disclosures Title(s) of Network Notification(s): Planned Network Change – Dormont, PA switch retirement Melissa Hefley Melissa Hefley Senior Manager – Contract Management Verizon Partner Solutions Telephone – (918) 590-6913 Date: February 13, 2019 Customer Legal Entity Name Company Address line 1 Address line 2 City State ZIP 365 Wireless LLC 365 Wireless LLC 2870 Peachtree Rd Suite 951 Atlanta GA 30305 365 Wireless, LLC 365 Wireless, LLC 2870 Peachtree Rd #951 Atlanta GA 30305 Access 2000 Access 2000 1241 West Chester Pike West Chester PA 19382 Access Point, Inc. Access Point, Inc. 1100 Crescent Green, Suite 109 Cary NC 27518 Acecape ACE Innovative Networks 277 Broadway Suite 807 New York NY 10007 ACN Communication Services, Inc. ACN Communication Services, Inc. 1000 Progress Place NE Concord NC 28025 ACN Communication Services, LLC ACN Communication Services, LLC 1000 Progress Place Concord NC 28025 ACN Communication Services, LLC ACN Communication Services, LLC 1000 Progress Place Concord NC 28025 ACN Communication Services, LLC ACN Communication Services, LLC 1000 Progress Place NE Concord NC 28025 Vesta Solutions, Inc. Airbus DS Communications, Inc. P.O. Box 9007 42555 Rio Nedo Temecula CA 92589 Airespring, Inc. Airespring, Inc. 7800 Woodley Ave. Van Nuys CA 91406 Airus, Inc. Airus, Inc. 840 South Canal, 7th Floor Chicago IL 60607 Allied Telecom Group, L.L.C. Allied Telecom Group, L.L.C. 1400 Crystal Dr., Ste. 700 Arlington VA 22202 Allied Telecom Group, L.L.C. Allied Telecom Group, L.L.C. 1400 Crystal Dr., Ste. 700 Arlington VA 22202 America Online, Inc. America Online, Inc. 22000 AOL Way Dulles VA 20166 Network Services LLC American Messaging Services, LLC 1720 Lakepointe Dr., Ste. 100 Lewisville TX 75057 American Telecharge, Inc. American Telecharge, Inc. P.O. Box 130659 Dallas TX 75313 American Telesis American Telesis 200 East 7th Street, Suite 201 Loveland CO 80537 Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. 10806 Garrison Hollow Road Clear Spring MD 21722 AT&T Corp. AT&T Corp. One AT&T Way, RM 2A132 Bedminster NJ 07921 AT&T Corp. AT&T Corp. 3600 Aynor Dr. Mitchellville MD 20721 AT&T Corp. AT&T Corp. 30 Knightsbridge Rd., Rm. 32C269A Piscataway NJ 08854 Teleport Communications America, LLC AT&T Global Access Management One AT&T Way Room 2A132 Bedminster NJ 07921 AT&T Internet Services AT&T Internet Services 308 S Akard Street, Room 1520 Dallas TX 75202 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC AT&T Mobility 1 AT&T Way, Rm 4A105 Bedminster NJ 07921 Pacific Bell Telephone Company AT&T Network Operations 4711 Spring Street, Room #117 Room #117 La Mesa CA 91941 AT&T Corp. AT&T Services, Inc. 208 South Akard Street Dallas TX 75202 AT&T Corp. AT&T Services, Inc. 161 Inverness Drive West Room 474 Englewood CO 80112 AT&T Corp. AT&T Services, Inc. 311 S. Ackard Room 660 Dallas TX 75202 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC AT&T Services, Inc. 208 S. Akard Dallas TX 75202 AT&T Corp. AT&T Services, Inc. 208 S. Ackard St. Dallas TX 75202 Bandwidth, Inc. Bandwidth, Inc. 900 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 Raleigh NC 27606 Bandwidth.com, LLC Bandwidth.com, LLC 900 Main Campus Dr., Ste. 500 Raleigh NC 27606 Barr Tell USA, Inc. Barr Tell USA, Inc. 218 East Park Ave. Suite 522 Long Beach NY 11561 BCM One, Inc. BCM One, Inc. 521 5th Avenue, Fl 14 New York NY 10175 BCM One, Inc. BCM One, Inc. 521 5th Ave, Fl 14 New York NY 10175 BCM One, Inc. BCM One, Inc. 521 5th Avenue, Fl 14 New York NY 10175 BCN Telecom, Inc. BCN Telecom, Inc. 1200 Mt. Kemble Ave., Floor 3 Morristown NJ 07960 BCN Telecom, Inc. BCN Telecom, Inc. 1200 Mt. Kemble Ave., Floor 3 Morristown NJ 07960 Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. and NYNEX Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. and NYNEX Long Distance Company Long Distance Company 6665 N. MacArthur Blvd., HQK02D78 Irving TX 75039 BellSouth BSE Incorporated BellSouth BSE Incorporated 400 Perimeter Center Terrace Suite 400 Atlanta GA 30346 Berkshire County Network Berkshire County Network 17 Depot St Adams MA 01220 BestWeb Corp. BestWeb Corp. 25 South Riverside Av Croton NY 10520 Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI Billing Services, Inc., Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI Billing Services, Inc., Enhanced Services Billing, Inc., and HBS Billing Enhanced Services Billing, Inc., and HBS Billing Services Company Services Company 7411 John Smith Dr., Ste. 1500 San Antonio TX 78229 Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI Billing Services, Inc., Billing Concepts, Inc., ACI Billing Services, Inc., Enhanced Services Billing, Inc., and HBS Billing Enhanced Services Billing, Inc., and HBS Billing Services Company Services Company 7411 John Smith Dr., Ste.
Recommended publications
  • \\10.0.10.115\Eti\States\CA\2018-ORA\LLS Testimony\LLS Testimony Sprint T-Mo 01-05-19 NO FOOTER .Wpd

    \\10.0.10.115\Eti\States\CA\2018-ORA\LLS Testimony\LLS Testimony Sprint T-Mo 01-05-19 NO FOOTER .Wpd

    Before the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of the Joint Application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. (U-5112) and T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, For Approval of Transfer of Application 18-07-011 Control of Sprint Communications Company L.P. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 854(a). And Related Matter. Application 18-07-012 Direct Testimony of LEE L. SELWYN on behalf of the Public Advocates Office at the California Public Utilities Commission January 7, 2019 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LEE L. SELWYN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 Qualifications, background and experience 1 Assignment 6 The public interest and other issues identified in the Scoping Memo 7 ISSUE 1. How would the merger impact competition for services currently provided by Sprint or T-Mobile in any metropolitan area or other geographically distinct market? 8 The mobile wireless telecommunications market in California and throughout the US is already highly concentrated, and further market consolidation is neither warranted nor in the public interest. 8 An analytical framework for assessing the level of market concentration 15 As a general matter, wireless service price levels in the US are decidedly higher than in other western countries where multiple facilities-based carriers are present and where competition appears more intense. 22 ISSUE 3. What are the relevant markets to consider? 27 To properly utilize the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) to assess the level of market concentration, one must firmly establish a proper definition for the relevant product and geographic market.
  • CLLI™ Codes) Description for Location Identification

    CLLI™ Codes) Description for Location Identification

    COMMON LANGUAGE® Location Codes (CLLI™ Codes) Description for Location Identification Telcordia Technologies Practice BR-795-100-100 Issue 28, May 2010 Licensed Material — Property of Telcordia Technologies Possession and/or use of this material is subject to the provisions of a written license agreement with Telcordia Technologies. Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Confidential — Restricted Access This document and the confidential information it contains shall be distributed, routed or made available solely to authorized persons having a need to know within Telcordia, except with written permission of Telcordia. Confidential — Restricted Access BR-795-100-100 Copyright Page Issue 28, May 2010 COMMON LANGUAGE® Location Codes (CLLI™ Codes) Description for Location Identification Prepared for Telcordia Technologies by: John Curreri, [email protected] Target audience: Licensed Clients This document replaces: BR-795-100-100, Issue 27, May 2009 Where material has been added, changed, or deleted, the location of the change is marked by a vertical bar (|) in the outer margin next to the change. Related document: JA-18, Issue 22, May 2010 Technical contact: John Curreri, [email protected] To obtain copies of this document, contact your company’s document coordinator or your Telcordia account manager, or call +1 866.672.6997 (from the USA and Canada) or +1 732.699.6700 (worldwide), or visit our Web site at www.telcordia.com. Telcordia employees should call +1 732.699.5802. Copyright © 1997-2010 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark Acknowledgments COMMON LANGUAGE, LocateIt, Telcordia and TIRKS are registered trademarks and CLCI, CLEI, CLFI, and CLLI is a trademark of Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance for certified products based on the IEEE 802.11 standards.
  • Record of Prior Testimony

    Record of Prior Testimony

    RECORD OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2010 California Public Utilities Commission, O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) v. Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C), C.08-02-013 and Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C) v. O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) C. 09-06-025, on behalf of O1 Communications, Inc., Reply Testimony filed February 3, 2010. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn 2009 Illinois Commerce Commission, Frontier Communications Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., et al, Joint Application for Approval of a Reorganization, Docket No. 09-0268, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, Citizens Utility Board, Direct Testimony filed October 20, 2009, Rebuttal Testimony filed December 14, 2009. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, James Thomas, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Global Vision Products, Inc., Antony Imbriolo, Derrike Cope, David L. Gordon, Powertel Technologies, Inc., Craig Dix, Henry Edelson and Robert Debenedictis, Defendants, Case No. RG03-091195, on behalf of the Law Offices of Scott A. Bursor, Oral testimony and cross examination on November 9, 2009. Witness: Colin B. Weir United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Judy Larson, Barry Hall, Joe Milliron, Tessie Robb, and Willie Davis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AT&T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC and Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint Nextel and Nextel Finance Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-5325 (JLL), on behalf of PinilisHalpern, LLP and Law Offices of Scott A.
  • E 9-1-1 Activation Process

    E 9-1-1 Activation Process

    E 9-1-1 Activation Process For Frontier Wholesale Customers Disclaimer: This documentation is for information purposes only and does not obligate Frontier to provide services in the manner herein described. Frontier reserves the right as its sole option to modify or revise the information in this document at any time without prior notice. In no event shall Frontier or its agents, employees, directors, officers, representatives or suppliers be liable under contract, warranty, tort (including but not limited to negligence of Frontier), or any other legal theory, for any damages arising from or relating to this document or its contents, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. © 2020 Frontier Communications Corporation – All Rights Reserved. Revised: 04/13/2020 Effective: 05/01/2020 E911 Activation Process – Frontier DISCLAIMER: This document is designed to be a guide to the E9-1-1 activation process for Frontier Wholesale customers. Frontier may modify this Guide at any time with or without notice. In the event of any conflict between this Guide and any Interconnection Agreement or Tariff, the Interconnection Agreement or Tariff shall control. FRONTIER HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. FRONTIER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR GUARANTEES WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT. ANY RELIANCE ON THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT IS ENTIRELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 What is 9-1-1 ? ..............................................................................................................................
  • 1 Attachment 1 Notification of Pro Forma Assignment And

    1 Attachment 1 Notification of Pro Forma Assignment And

    ATTACHMENT 1 NOTIFICATION OF PRO FORMA ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF CONTROL Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 64.24(f) of the Commission’s rules,1 Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) notifies the Commission of an internal restructuring that occurred on July 31, 2018, which resulted in the pro forma assignment and transfer of control of certain licensees and authorizations. As further described below, as part of the restructuring the international Section 214 authorization (the “Authorization”) of XO Communications, LLC (“XOC”) was assigned to XO Communications Services, LLC (“XOCS”), and XOCS was relocated within the Verizon ownership chain.2 In addition, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries that were operating under the Authorization were eliminated or relocated in the Verizon ownership chain. Because the restructuring did not result in a change in the ultimate control of any licensees or authorizations, which continue to be controlled by Verizon, the transaction was pro forma. Answer to Question 10 (Section 63.18(c)-(d)) All communications in connection with this notification should be directed to the following: Ian Dillner Jennifer L. Kostyu Federal Regulatory Affairs Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP Verizon Communications Inc. 1800 M Street, N.W., Suite 800N 1300 I Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: 202.783.4141 Phone: 202.515.2458 Fax: 202.783.5851 [email protected] [email protected] Verizon, a Delaware corporation, does not hold any international Section 214 authorizations but it does directly or indirectly control subsidiaries that hold such authorizations to provide international switched resale services and global or limited global facilities-based and resale services.
  • The History of Verizon Communications

    The History of Verizon Communications

    The history of Verizon Communications Verizon Communications Inc., based in New York City and incorporated in Delaware, was formed on June 30, 2000, with the merger of Bell Atlantic Corp. and GTE Corp. Verizon began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the VZ symbol on Monday, July 3, 2000. It also began trading on the NASDAQ exchange under the same symbol on March 10, 2010. The symbol was selected because it uses the two letters of the Verizon logo that graphically portray speed, while also echoing the origin of the company name: veritas, the Latin word connoting certainty and reliability, and horizon, signifying forward-looking and visionary. While Verizon is truly a 21st century company, the mergers that formed Verizon were many years in the making, involving companies with roots that can be traced to the beginnings of the telephone business in the late 19th century. Government regulation largely shaped the evolution of the industry throughout most of the 20th century. Then, with the signing of the Telecommunications Act on February 8, 1996, federal law directed a shift to more market-based policies. This promise of a new competitive marketplace was a driving force behind Verizon’s formation. Verizon’s formation The mergers that formed Verizon were among the largest in U.S. business history, culminating in a definitive merger agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Bell Atlantic, based in New York City, and GTE, which was in the process of moving its headquarters from Stamford, Conn., to Irving, Texas. GTE and Bell Atlantic had each evolved and grown through years of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures.
  • Evaluation of the United States Department of Justice ______

    Evaluation of the United States Department of Justice ______

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Application by Verizon New Jersey ) Inc., Bell Atlantic Communications, ) Inc. (d/b/a Verizon Long Distance), ) NYNEX Long Distance Company ) WC Docket No. 02-67 (d/b/a Verizon Enterprise Solutions), ) Verizon Global Networks Inc., and ) Verizon Select Services Inc., for ) Authorization to Provide In-Region, ) InterLATA Services in New Jersey ) _______________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE _______________________________________________________ Charles A. James R. Hewitt Pate Assistant Attorney General Deputy Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division Margaret A. Ward Michael L. Katz Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General Deputy Assistant Attorney General Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Nancy M. Goodman Chief W. Robert Majure Benjamin D. Brown Assistant Chief Katherine E. Brown J. Parker Erkmann John Henly Lauren J. Fishbein Jeffrey Prisbrey Laura R. Starling Economists Economic Regulatory Section Attorneys Telecommunications and Media April 15, 2002 Enforcement Section Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Justice Verizon - New Jersey II (April 15, 2002) Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................... ii Index of Full Citations ................................................... iii Introduction and Summary .................................................1 I. The Department’s Evaluation .........................................3
  • Exhibit II Curriculum Vitae Ofdon J

    Exhibit II Curriculum Vitae Ofdon J

    Exhibit II Curriculum Vitae ofDon J. Wood 914 Stream Valley Trail, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 770. 475.9971, [email protected] CURRENT EMPLOYMENT Don J. Wood is a principal in the firm of Wood & Wood. He provides economic, financial, and regulatory analysis services in telecommunications and other technology-driven industries, specializing in economic policy related to the development of competitive markets, intercarrier compensation, regulatory compliance, cost of service issues, and the calculation of financial damages. In addition, Mr. Wood advises industry associations on regulatory and economic policy and assists investors in their evaluation of investment opportunities. In the area of administrative law, Mr. Wood has presented testimony before the regulatory bodies of forty-three states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and has prepared comments and testimony for filing with the Federal Communications Commission. The subject matter of his testimony has ranged from broad policy issues to detailed cost and rate analysis. Mr. Wood has also presented testimony in state, federal, and overseas courts regarding business plans and strategies, competition policy, intercarrier compensation disputes, and cost of service issues. He has presented studies of the damages incurred by plaintiffs and has provided rebuttal testimony to damage calculations performed by others. Mr. Wood has also testified in alternative dispute resolution proceedings conducted pursuant to both AAA and CPR rules. Mr. Wood is an experienced commercial mediator and is registered as a neutral with the Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution. PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT Klick. Kent & Allen/FfI Consultim?. Inc. Regional Director. GDS Associates, Inc. Senior Project Manager. MCI Telecommunications Corporation Manager of Regulatory Analysis, Southeast Division.
  • CCC NORTHERNTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CRTC 25510 Page

    CCC NORTHERNTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CRTC 25510 Page

    NORTHERNTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CRTC 25510 Page 1 GENERAL TARIFF Revision 4 Section N200 ACCESS SERVICES TARIFF PRIMARY INTEREXCHANGE CARRIER AND CUSTOMER ACCOUNT RECORD CHANGE (PIC/CARE) NOTE: In accordance with the determinations set out by the Commission in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2017-11, all persons who offer and provide any telecommunications services who are not Canadian carriers as defined in the Telecommunications Act shall: (1) register with the Commission prior to receiving service from the Company; (2) ensure that all of their own wholesale customers and subordinate wholesale customers have registered with the Commission prior to receiving telecommunications services; and (3) abide by the obligations set out in the Appendix to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2017-11 as well as any subsequent requirements as may be set out by the Commission from time to time and ensure that all of their own wholesale customers and subordinate wholesale customers abide by these requirements. 1. Definitions For the purposes of this Tariff: 1.01 CARE is Customer Account Record Exchange 1.02 Interconnecting Circuit means a circuit or path that connects an IXC’s facility to a facility of the Company to provide access to the Company’s public switched telephone network (PSTN). An interconnecting circuit may connect: (a) an IXC’s facility to a Company Central Office to which customer C lines are directly connected (end office); or (b) a Company Central Office to an IXC’s Centrex service via a Direct C Inward System Access (DISA) path; or (c) an IXC’s Centrex service to the PSTN via an outgoing Centrex PSTN connection; or (d) an IXC’s facility to a Company Central Office to which end offices C are directly connected in order to originate or terminate toll traffic (toll office).

  • Filed/Accepted

    EMBARQ~ Voice \ Data \ Internet \ Wireless \ Entertainment Embarq Mailstop: KSOPKJ0502-5032 December 13,2006 54~.,«E;.~tl'W pth Street DOCKET FILE COpy <&.Ifull'li,\/,-Ks 66211 FILED/ACCEPTED Secretary Federal Communications Commission DEC 13 2006 Washington, DC 20554 Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary Attention: Wireline Competition Bureau The accompanying material is being submitted on behalfofthe Embarq local operating companies (Embarq LaC), and is sent to you for filing in compliance with the requirements ofthe Federal Communications Commission's Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, In the Matter ofImplementation ofthe Local Competition Provisions ofthe Telecommunications Act of1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, released August 8, 1996 (FCC 96-333). This submission includes notification ofnetwork changes proposed by Embarq LaC and scheduled to become effective on the dates indicated herein. Since certain ofthe proposed changes are being implemented on less than six months notice, telephone exchange service providers directly interconnecting with Embark LaC's network were notified ofthe proposed changes at least five business days prior to this filing with the Commission. In this regard, a certificate ofservice identifying the service providers notified is included as required by Section 51.333 ofthe Commission's Rules. Acknowledgment and date ofreceipt ofthis submission is requested. A duplicate copy ofthe letter is provided for this purpose. In addition, one paper copy and one diskette copy ofthe proposed network changes have been provided to the Chief, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. All correspondence and inquiries in connection with this information should be addressed to me at 5454 West 11 Oth Street, Mailstop KSOPKJ0502-5032, Overland Park KS 66211, (913) 345-7853.

  • 48431 Illillion Item Number: 1 Addendum Startpage: 0

    11 11 1 111 11 i 11 i 1 111 i 1 11 Con rol um er: 48431 illillION Item Number: 1 Addendum StartPage: 0 Public Utility Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. O. Box 13326 Austin, Texas 78711-3326 512 / 936-7000 • (Fax) 936-7003 Fri 11: 25 Web Site: www.puc.state.tx.us TITLE PAGE APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION, RE-QUALIFICATION, OR AMENDMENT TO A SERVICE PROVIDER CERTIFICATE OF OPERATING AUTHORITY OR A CERTIFICATE OF yER4AT G AUTHQ.RITY L § DOCKET/PROJECT NO. 4 3 1 APPLICANT(s): 1. MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services ("MCICS”) 2. XO Communications Services, LLC ("XO") Authorized Representative for this Application: Dulaney L. O'Roark III General Counsel -- South Verizon One Verizon Place Alpharetta, GA 30004 Tel: 678-339-5081 Fax: 678-339-8492 [email protected] Regulatory Representative: Kathy L. Buckley VP, State Government Affairs Verizon 4700 MacCorkle Ave., SE, Box 3 Charleston, WV 25304 Tel: 304-356-3194 Fax: 304-356-3590 [email protected] Complaint Representative: Verizon: Rick Greiner Acting Supervisor 500 2nd Avenue Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 Tel: 319-892-2047 800-624-0533 Fax: 800-854-7960 [email protected] XO: Executive Response Team 9201 N. Central Expressway, Bldg B 3( Floor Dallas, TX 75231 Tel: 877-912-4829 Fax: 214-261-7509 [email protected] Effective Date 2 AFFIDAVIT State of West Virginia County of Kanawha 1. My name is Kathy L. Buckley. I am Vice President, Regulatory Affairs for the Applicants, MCI Communications Services, Inc.
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-58

    Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-58

    Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-58 Ottawa, 6 October 2005 Issues related to CLEC Access to ILEC OSS Reference: 8638-C12-200506016 The Commission approves the operational support systems (OSS) working group quarterly progress report on competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) access to incumbent local exchange carrier OSS. The Commission finds that Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) are not required to provide the service address query function proposed by the CLECs as part of CLEC access to OSS. The Commission directs, however, Bell Canada to provide CLECs with Bell Canada’s proposed graphical user interface service address query function by 31 December 2005, and TCI to provide CLECs with a service address query function similar to that proposed by Bell Canada by 16 March 2006. Background 1. In Competitive local exchange carrier access to incumbent local exchange carrier operational support systems, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-14, 16 March 2005 (Decision 2005-14), the Commission directed Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) to develop and implement competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) access to certain operational support systems (OSS) within a one-year period. 2. In order to achieve that objective, the Commission directed the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee (CISC) OSS working group (OSWG) to report to the Commission, within two months of Decision 2005-14, the industry-wide standard formats and protocols that would be used for the exchange of OSS information between incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) and CLECs. The Commission also indicated that any non-consensus items should be reported to the Commission as soon as possible so that these items could be dealt with by the Commission on an expedited basis, in order to not delay the development and implementation process.