TIMING and RATE of SKELETAL MATURATION in HORSES, with Comments on Starting Young Horses and the State of the Industry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TIMING AND RATE OF SKELETAL MATURATION IN HORSES, With Comments on Starting Young Horses and the State of the Industry ©2008 By Deb Bennett, Ph.D. Introduction One of the most widely-read and widely- requested pieces of information contained in our ESI Website has been the following article which we familiarly refer to as “the Ranger piece.” By 2008, with our permission this article has been re-printed in more than 75 magazines and riding-club newsletters in countries as far away as South Africa, Scotland, and New Zealand. Without our permission it has also been posted on about a gazillion websites and “boards”, and, I am sure – one way or another — read by many thousands of people. Originally posted on December 14th, 2001 as part of the old “conformation analysis” section of our website, it was taken off line in January of 2004 with the restructuring of the site. It ran from 2005 to mid-2008 in the “Knowledge Base” section of our upgraded website, and a newly-revised version, which for the first time includes data tables and a Fig. 1. Barbaro at the Preakness, before his catastrophic bibliography of technical references, is here bone fracture. presented in PDF format. We continue to post this article in the belief that you might appreciate having a downloadable copy, so as to more readily be able to share it with friends and neighbors whom you think might want or need to see it. Of particular relevance are recent conversations I have had with breeders, owners, the officials of several different humane organizations, news reporters, veterinarians, and numerous members of the general public who have been concerned over the well-publicized deaths of such racehorses as Ruffian, Barbaro, and Eight Belles. While some have cited “poor breeding practices” (inbreeding to Native Dancer) as cause for the catastrophic fractures which ultimately killed these horses and which were incurred during or just after high-stakes races, others have pointed to the rampant abuse at the tracks of drugs such as lasix, corticosteroids, and phenylbutazone, and of treatments such as joint injections. Dr. Gregory L. Ferraro, currently Director of the Center for Equine Health at the University of California at Davis, writing in a 1992 issue of The North American Review, observes: “In general, treatments designed to repair a horse’s injuries and to alleviate its suffering are now used to get the animal out onto the track to compete – to force the animal, like some punchdrunk fighter, to make just one more round. Equine veterinary medicine has been misdirected from the art of healing to the craft of portfolio management, and the business of horse racing is in the process of killing its goose with the golden eggs.” Ferraro’s stinging rebuke rings true, but there is yet another factor: it would be absolutely foolish to ignore the fact that racehorses are routinely trained and competed long before they have a chance to achieve physical maturity. That an official of a racing organization should, in a nationally-broadcast interview, defend the practice of racing two, three, and four-year-old horses does not shock me. Neither has it shocked me when I have received angry Emails from track sponsors or members of racing organizations – these people have a vested interest that they feel is being threatened by facts presented in this article. What does shock me is being castigated by an official of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, who Fig. 2. Barbaro holds up the fractured hind pastern that claims, in harmony with racing interests, ultimately caused his death. that horses are fully mature at two years of age. Any such statement is utter falsehood. This person – I can hardly believe that he had received a veterinary education – was totally unaware, as many members of the general public are also unaware, that horses have more than one “growth plate”, that there are multiple ossification centers pertaining to every bone of the body outside of the skull, and that the schedule of growth- plate closure (which begins around the time of birth and extends until the sixth year, and is coordinated with the eruption schedule of the teeth) has been well known to veterinarians, paleontologists, zooarchaeologists, and mammalogists since the early 19th century. Racing interests sometimes cite as justification for competing very young horses that “race conditioning is good for their bones.” This statement is a mis- application of good research, which has shown that, indeed, the distal limb bones of young horses in training remodel in response Fig. 3. Charismatic (left) battles Silverbulletday at the 1999 Belmont Stakes. Torque and forces of impact on bones can reach dangerously high levels in championship racing. Charismatic suffered a limb fracture at the end of this race. He later recovered and went on to a breeding career. to whatever stresses they’re faced with. Thus, it is wise for American breeders and race trainers to have young horses, even foals, on a program in which they run as a group or herd to the left, on unbanked hard turf or dirt – because those are the conditions they’re going to find on American tracks. When bone-scans or postmortem studies are done on young horses that have undergone this “preconditioning,” it is found that the left sidewalls of the cannon bone shafts have thickened in response to the stress. This, however, has nothing whatsoever to do with the rate at which the bones mature, and it does nothing to accellerate (or retard) the schedule of fusion of the growth Fig. 4. One very telling statistic: the average number of starts plates. Moreover, what happens during per horse per year has declined nearly 50% since 1960. Ac- “preconditioning” is not the cording to the same source, career starts have dropped 90%. development of “super bone” — These figures show that racehorses are either actually less significantly more bone substance durable, or are being managed as if they were less durable than than there would have been without in the past. preconditioning — but merely the remodeling of the bone, which means that bone substance that would have been evenly distributed through the bone shaft without preconditioning, is merely shifted with preconditioning from one wall of the bone to another. Is preconditioning good for young horses? Only in relative terms, for the animal would have achieved equal or better bone substance and quality if it had simply been allowed to mature for a longer time before racing. While growth in cannon bone length stops with the fusion of both growth plates at around 1 ½ years of age, increase in cannon bone girth does not taper off until close to 5 years of age, and essentially the same can be said for the girth of any other limb element, with those bones located higher up in the body maturing later. The Kentucky Derby, one of the oldest and most prestigious race meets in the world, is a futurity contest open to horses “officially” three years old when they come out of the starting gate. That is what a “futurity” contest is: a race for horses that are not yet physically mature. What the present article teaches – bottom line – is that no horse, of any breed, in any country, at any time in history either now or in the past, has ever been physically mature before it is five and a half years old: and that would be small, scrubby mares living on rough tucker. Healthy, domestically-raised males, and many females, do not mature until they are six. Tall, long-necked horses may take even longer than that. What we are talking about here is the skeleton – and it has been skeletal fractures and/or ruptures that have killed not only the three famous racehorses noted above, but many hundreds of others involved in racing, Three Day Event, and open jumping. It should be noted that by no means all racehorses currently active at the track are immature: there are many “claimers” or veteran racers on American tracks that are six years or older, and an even larger population of these “maturity” horses in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand where longer races and turf tracks are more common. Unfortunately, however, racing rules in almost all American states mandate that Thoroughbreds must “break maiden” – win a race — before they are four years old; so that virtually 100% of all Thoroughbreds at American tracks are in training, and being raced, before achieving physical maturity. Those who stay at the track past their fourth birthday are, simply, the survivors. Oftentimes, such horses are gelded males who, though they might be winners, cannot be “retired” to a breeding career. It should also be noted that some mature horses suffer distal limb fractures in the course of racing: but not at anything like the rate at which immature horses succumb to them. We need to be clear that the sesamoid fracture that killed Ruffian and the fractured pasterns that killed Barbaro and Eight Belles are not directly related to growth plate fusion. In a three year old horse, all the growth plates from the distal end of the radius down are normally already fused. Nevertheless, another lesson taught by the present paper is that most of the growth plates above the distal radius in a three year old horse are unfused, including, most importantly, those of the animal’s spine. It is the spine of the horse that governs the overall coordination of the limbs and the animal’s running “style”. It is the spine, not the limbs, that the animal primarily uses to compensate for potholes, slick spots, and other irregularities in the track.