DOCSLIB.ORG

General Notes on Rx from Quirke L Prop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

•AT 41J86NWee28 BUCKLES48 BUCKLES 010 GENERAL NOTES ON ROCKS FROM QUIRKE LAKE PROPERTY In the accompanying reports on the individual sections the name of the rock as logged will be found following the sectin number. The true name for the rock will be found underlined near the end of each report. A number of points concerning the nomenclature require special mention. The names given during logging are to all intents accurate; with the exception of the quartzites which, with the exception of K2512, belong truly to the greywacke group. This is caused by the presence of altered argillaceous material as a matrix. The definition of greywacke presupposes that the rock consists of fragments of quartz, possibly feld spar and of rock in an argillaceous matrix. Sub-greywacke is a greywacke in which the argillaceous material is present in small amount. Sandstones and their metamorphic equivalents have no argillaceous matrix, the cement usually being quartz or rarely carbonate. The variation between the various members of the series K2511, K2513, K25H, K2515, K2516, K2518, K2523 can be seen to be essentially a variation in the ratio of quartz to matrix. The Huronian sediments have all suffered very low grade metamorphism, the degree being shown by the amount of recrys tallization of the argillaceous material. The clay minerals have gone over to sericite, the FeMg clastic fraction of the clay to chlorite© and in a few cases it is possible to see incipient combination of the two to form new biotite. At no; ;. y point has the biotite stage of metamorphism been attainedf^^fy^. ~ r-© © V- © ©""VjS.©^V © i"t"©(©"©-*©©i^S-- . j^X/r^V©i " QMii ill : ^^i^^O'^^^^^*™ ,:' B ..l J ' ^i '-M . • -•.'•' - - ••.'.(••" V.TLv:- life f. \ S m--tifyft". - 2 - © Sf-:!-©?©.."1: © © ||; These rocks are remarkably free of introduced material and although ||5 many of them have been intensely deformed most of the minerals in l;; fractures could be derived from primary constituents. This is ;! especially true of the carbonates which are present in some of ?; the rocks and which in general have the tendancy to become mobile under stress. The pyrite which is fairly common has obviously recrystallized but its distribution does not suggest introduction but rather the recrystallization of some primary constituents. Other accessory minerals are notably absent. Of the Pre-Huronian rocks K2519 and K2520 are true andesites as logged. The granite, diorite and granodiorite are really all granites, admittedly of different character and degree of alteration, giving them a great differ3nce in appearance in hand specimen. It would be impossible to say how they are related. K2523 logged as granodiorite is a sediment of greywacke composition, and I would suggest that it is related to the Huronian sediments and not pre-Huronian as suggested. K2506. DDH-Q309. Banded greywacke and argillite Coarse phase Approx. Calcite matrix jr© Quartz ;x: fragments V;, Plagioclase ^ r Pyrite in irregular patches --•':**r-"'--. '.'. - '-. ^ ' * •IfeS"-,'-,. -. '. Few graJ ns'sericite ;' Fine phase . Sericite 20# to Quartz and Feldspar #0?S to Rock is banded coarse and fine more or less alternating. The fragments in the coarse are of silt size, angular and up to 1/10 mm. diameter, with quartz predominant and not over 10^ feldspar. No argillaceous material in matrix which consists of calcite. This phase is really only a silty limestone. Meta~ morphism has not been sufficiently intense to cause reaction between the constituents. The fine grained phase consists of a gradation between mainly sericite with a little fine silt to mainly fine silt with sorr.e interstitial sericite and is therefore a graded bedded silty argillite showing low grade met amor phi srri. There has been considerable contortion of the original bedding. Rock is a banded silty argillite and limestone. K2507. DDH-Q309 Argillite probably a greywacke Approx. Cataclastic quartz grains Sericite Chlorite Calcite in veinlets and corroding quartz Few grains plagioclase Rock consists of very badly mashed up (cataclastic) grains ;, of quartz up to 5 nun. diam. in a matrix of sericite and ©rchiorito;i-© © -r ©© © © "© .- :© ::- © - - ••''^••:.^- !\-.':-^l^^i:^'^l^i^^^^ - 4 - The matrix shows signs of flowage, developing a mullion like structure-around, the quartz, and dragging broken fragments off the larger grains. The deformation has been particularly intense as it is unusual for quartz grains to be so considerably broken up when imbedded in such a soft matrix. Metamorphism is a low grade. Sufficient to cause sericite to form from the original argillaceous material but not advanced encugh to form biotite with the sericite and chlorite. The rock is a true greywacke, intensely deformed. K2508. Banded limestone and argillite Approx. Cataclastic quartz Calcite Chlorite vSericite Small amount of biotite The rock consists of badly mashed up quartz which was probably originally of sand size but has been reduced by deformation to a mush of cataclastic fragments in a carbonate matrix. The quartz is accompanied by chlorite and sericite showing flowage structure. In places there is a tendency to the formation of biotite in very small amount from some of the chlorite. The carbonate has obviously recrystallized which would be expected with deformation sufficient to brecciate the quartz. The chlorite and sericite have therefore been streaked out along with the quartz. The rock was probably a sandy limestone carrying a ,© : - 5 - small amount of argillaceous material in the matrix and during deformation the components have segregated. Rock is a highly deformed sandy limestone. K2509 Banded limestone and calcite veinlet Approx. Calcite 90^ Quartz ) ) 10/0 Feldspar) Rock consists wholly of fine grained calcite with a small amount of fine silty quartz and a few grains of plagioclase. The dark bands almost ur.detectable in thin section seem to be the result of a fine dusting of carbonaceous material. The rock appears to be ^.deformed. The v jinlvit consists mainly of calcite although there are a few grains of quartz up to l mm. in diameter. In places the walls have a lining of fine grained quartz. The quartz in the veinlet has been much corroded by the calcite and it looks somewhat as if it were originally a quartz veinlet replaced by calcite. The rock is a slightly silty limestone. K2510. Granite boulder in pebble conglomerate. Granite Pebble composition: Approx: Quartz Fresh microcline Sericitized plagioclase about obligoclase-andesine - 6 - Green biotite altering to chlorite Carbonate Few grains epidote, some zircon Pyrite and black opaque material Coarse grained granitic, the plagioclase is badly sericitized, the microcline remarkably fresh. The quartz is strained and almost cataclastic. All the minerals are shot through with stringers of Carbonate with which the opaques are associated. The rock is a ^ranodiorite. Matric composition : Approx: Quartz 60fo Plagioclase (sericitized) Micrclinec. Chlorite and sericite Carbonate The matrix consists of almost the same material as the pebble with the exception of biotite. The quartz and feldspar grains are quite coarse, of sand size, and of fairly uniform coarseness of grain (about l mm.}. All are well rounded to sub rounded. These are set in a matrix of sericite and chlorite with some carbonate replacing the matrix particularly at the borders of the pebble. The rock is a conglomerate with a sandy and argillaceous matric having a tendency cowards being arkosic. This might be s-vJ!?W? * j©lVX"y*--'' - 7 " K2510 (Cont©d) called a coarse greywacke. Metamorphism has been low grade, still in chlorite stage as there is no sign of biotite in the matrix and possibly the chlorite in the pebble is retrograde. There is no sign of interchange of material between the pebble and matrix. Any apparent "reaction" rim around the pebble may probably be the coating of carbonate. K2511. Quartzite, probably arkose or grit Approx. Quartz (slightly cataclastic) Microcline) Plagioclase ) Sericite and chlorite I 5fo Biotite The rock looks rather like the matrix of K2510 and consists of coarse quartz grains with minor amounts of feldspar, all of which are still showing the original sedimentary roundness. The grains have been slightly deformed with a tendancy to the formation of cataclastic texture. The matrix is mainly a mixture of chlorite and sericite which are beginning to go over to biotite so that the metamorphism is slightly more advanced than in K2510. This shews also in the very slight reaction between the matrix and the quartz grains around the borders of the latter. The rock would properly be called sub greywacke (grit requires ^... .... - 8 - angular grains) and does not have sufficient feldspar to be truly arkosic. Because of the presence of the argillaceous matrix and the lack of recrystallization of the quartz it is definitely not a true quartzite. K2512. Fine grained white quartzite Approx. Quartz 95# Microcline) ) less than 5^ Plagioclase ) Sericite and chlorite very small amount This is probably a phase of the same rock as K2511. It is almost wholly made up of grains of quartz with a few grains of feldspar of fairly uniform grain size about 2mm. diameter. There is a very little recrystallized argillaceous material, but insufficient to be significant. The grains have been cataclastically deformed so that although there has been no recrystallization of the quartz the rock has the appearance of a true quartzite. One could call the rock a cataclastically deformed sandstone but quartzite would be accurate enough within the definition of the term without splitting hairs. K2513. Quartzite Approx. Quartz * 40# ;iv ' -' ./j". -* . * f|^. ' © . - 9 - ttv.: . ;v Plagioclase slightly sericitized I . 15* .^v Microcline fresh 'S Sericite and chlorite ) •c . j 40?5 Biotite ) Pyrite Ankerite ? Limonite The grains of quartz and feldspar are rounded to subangular and have been somewhat cataclastically deformed. These are set in a matric of sericite and chlorite which is in process of going over to biotite.
Recommended publications
  • CMD 18-M48.9A File/Dossier : 6.02.04 Date

    CMD 18-M48.9A File/Dossier : 6.02.04 Date

    CMD 18-M48.9A File/dossier : 6.02.04 Date : 2018-12-03 Edocs pdf : 5725730 Revised written submission from Mémoire révisé de Northwatch Northwatch In the Matter of À l’égard de Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Rapport de surveillance réglementaire des Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned mines et usines de concentration d’uranium et Sites in Canada: 2017 des sites historiques et déclassés au Canada : 2017 Commission Meeting Réunion de la Commission December 12, 2018 Le 12 décembre 2018 Revised version with changes made on pages 5 and 6 November 20, 2018 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street, P.O. Box 1046, Station B Ottawa, ON K1P 5S9 Ref. CMD 18-M48 Dear President Velshi and Commission Members: Re. Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned Sites in Canada: 2017 On 29 June 2018 the Secretariat for the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission provided notice that the Commission would hold a public meeting in December 2018 during which CNSC staff will present its Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned Sites in Canada: 2017. The notice further indicated that the Report would be available after October 12, 2018, online or by request to the Secretariat, and that members of the public who have an interest or expertise on this matter are invited to comment, in writing, on the Report by November 13 2017. Northwatch provides these comments further to that Notice. Northwatch appreciates the extension of the deadline for submission of our comments by one week in response to delays in finalizing the contribution agreement which had to be in place prior to our technical experts beginning their review.
  • Uranium Deposits of Ontario- Their Distribution and Classification

    Uranium Deposits of Ontario- Their Distribution and Classification

    Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 86 The Uranium Deposits of Ontario- Their Distribution and Classification By James A. Robertson 1981 lanWPope Ministry of !^st£ Natural ...__ W.T. Foster Deputy Minister Ontario ®OMNR-OGS 1981 ISSN 0704-2752 Printed in Canada ISBN 0-7743-602627 Publications of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and price list are available through the Ministry of Natural Resources, Public Service Centre Room 1640, Whitney Block, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 1W3 (personal shopping and mail orders). and reports only from the Ontario Government Bookstore, Main Floor 880 Bay St., Toronto for per- sonal shopping. Out-of-Town customers write to Ministry of Government Services, Publica- tions Services Section, 5th Floor, 880 Bay St., Toronto. Ontario. M7A 1N8. Telephone 965-6015. Toll free long distance 1 •800-268-7540, in Area Code 807 dial 0-Zenith 67200. Orders for publications should be accompanied by cheque or money order payable to the Treasurer of Ontario. Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information con- tained in this report, but the Ministry of Natural Resources does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users may wish to verify critical information. Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this report be made in the following form: Robertson, James A. 1981: The Uranium Deposits ol Ontario-Their Distribution and Classifica- tion; Ontario Geological
  • U and Th Deposits

    U and Th Deposits

    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
  • Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Northern Ontario

    Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Northern Ontario

    Ontario Geological Survey Mineral Deposits Circular 25 Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Northern Ontario by James A. Robertson and Kerry L. Gould This project was partially funded by the Ministry of Northern Affairs 1983 Ministry of Hoa Alan w. Pope Minister Natural lA(__ , W. T. Foster Resources Deputy Minister Ontario Copyright OMNR 1983 ISSN 0706-4551 Printed in Canada ISBN 0-7743-8439-5 Publications of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources are available from the following sources. Orders for publications should be accompanied by cheque or money order payable to the Treasurer of Ontario. Reports, maps, and price lists (personal shopping or mail order): Public Service Centre, Ministry of Natural Resources Room 1640, Whitney Block, Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Reports and accompanying maps only (personal shopping). Ontario Government Bookstore Main Floor, 880 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario Reports and accompanying maps (mail order or telephone orders): Publications Services Section, Ministry of Government Services 5th Floor, 880 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 1N8 Telephone (local calls), 965-6015 Toll-free long distance, 1-800-268-7540 Toll-free from area code 807, O-ZENITH-67200 Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but the Ministry of Natural Resources does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users may wish to verify critical information. Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this report be made in the following form: Robertson, J.A., and Gould, K.L 1983: Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Northern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Mineral Deposits Circular 25, 152p.
  • The Blind River Uranium Deposits: the Ores and Their Setting

    The Blind River Uranium Deposits: the Ores and Their Setting

    Ontario Division of Mines THE BLIND RIVER URANIUM DEPOSITS: THE ORES AND THEIR SETTING by James A. Robertson MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 65 1976 MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ontario Division of Mines HONOURABLE LEO BERNIER, Minister of Natural Resources DR. J. K. REYNOLDS, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources G. A. Jewett, Executive Director, Division of Mines E. G. Pye, Director, Geological Branch THE BLIND RIVER URANIUM DEPOSITS: THE ORES AND THEIR SETTING1 by James A.Robertson MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 65 1976 MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1A paper presented at a workshop sponsored by the United States Geoloqical Survey on The Genesis of Uranium—and Gold-Bearing Precambrian Quartz- Pebble Conglomerates at Golden, Colorado, October 13 to 14, 1975. ©ODM 1976 Publications of the Ontario Division of Mines and price list are obtainable through the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Map Unit, Public Service Centre Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario and The Ontario Government Bookstore 880 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario. Orders for publications should be accompanied by cheque, or money order, payable to Treasurer of Ontario. Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given to the Ontario Division of Mines. It is recommended that reference to this report be made in the following form- Robertson, James, A. 1976: The Blind River Uranium Deposits: The Ores and Their Setting; Ontario Div. Mines, MP 65, 45p. 3000-300-1976-BP CONTENTS PAGE Abstract ;• Introduction I Regional Geology 1 Table of Formations 2-3 Archean (Early Precambrian) ."> Keewatin-Type
  • U, Th Deposits

    U, Th Deposits

    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
  • Canadian Experience with Uranium Tailings Disposal By: Kb Culver

    Canadian Experience with Uranium Tailings Disposal By: Kb Culver

    CANADIAN EXPERIENCE WITH URANIUM TAILINGS DISPOSAL BY: K. B. CULVER - RIO ALGOM LIMITED ay INTRODUCTION; No matter what we produce or manufacture in this world, be it food, clothing, metals, petroleum products or energy, waste is produced as a by-product. The disposal of the waste product may be as technically simple as garbage collection from your household and burial in a land-fill site or as politically complex as irradiated fuel bundles from a nuclear power generation station. In the mining industry this waste product is called tailings, which in simple terms represents finely ground rock from which a large percentage of the economic mineral product has been removed. Unfortunately, the mxneral content of a ton of rock is generally low, so that large quantities of rock must be treated to meet society's requirements. TRANSPARENCY 1 For instance, the Lornex mine, a large open pit copper producer in B.C. recovers 7.5 pounds of copper from each ton of rock. Thus, for each 2,000 pounds milled they must dispose of 1992.5 pounds of rock, or tailings. Since they only recover 90% of the copper, the tailings contain 0.83 pounds of copper. Lornex is currently milling in excess of 80,000 tons/day. A typical gold mine will recover 0.29 ounces of gold per ton of rock treated and disposes 1999.93 pounds of tailings. At the uranium operations in Elliot Lake, approximately 1.6 pounds of uranium are recovered per ton of rock treated and 1998.4 pounds of tailings are disposed. Since only 94% of the uranium is recovered, the tailings contain 0.11 pouiA': .
  • Performance of Shallow Water Covers on Pyritic Uranium Tailings

    Performance of Shallow Water Covers on Pyritic Uranium Tailings

    Performance of Shallow Water Covers on Pyritic Uranium Tailings I Ludgate1, A Coggan2 and N K Davé3 ABSTRACT The ore was hosted as metamorphosed quartz-pebble conglomerate with the mineralisation confined mainly to the The performance of in situ, shallow water covers in controlling acid generation was evaluated at four recently decommissioned pyritic cementing material that bound the pebbles. The uranium milling uranium tailings sites at Elliot Lake, Ontario, Canada. The tailings are and extraction processes consisted of hot-sulfuric-acid leaching, acid generating, having a pyrite content of approximately five to ten per using compressed air or hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant, cent and a very low to non-existent alkaline buffering capacity. followed by ion-exchange separation and precipitation as Adverse market conditions led to the closure of all operating uranium ammonium di-uranate or magnesium uranate (yellow cake). The mines in the early- to mid-1990s, followed by rehabilitation and latter process was adopted for newer second-generation mills for decommissioning of mine and waste management facilities. In order to decreasing the total ammonia load to the environment. control acidic drainage, all new and active tailings areas at Denison, The tailings were neutralised and deposited in surface-based Quirke, Panel, Spanish-American and Stanleigh mine sites were overland tailings impoundments. The Tailings Management re-engineered to provide in situ submersion of these tailings under Areas (TMAs) were generally located in valley depressions shallow water covers. The tailings impoundment dams were upgraded and reinforced or in some cases reconstructed, to minimise seepages and bounded by upland ridges and outcrops and impounded by provide a minimum 1 m depth of water cover.
  • Ontario's Uranium Mining Industry- Past, Present, and Future

    Ontario's Uranium Mining Industry- Past, Present, and Future

    r THE AUTHOR O. J. C. Runnalls, M.A.Sc, Ph.D., P.Eng. Former Senior Adviser, Uranium and Nuclear Energy, Energy, Mines and Resources, Canada, and executive Vice-President, Uranium Canada Limited Professor of Energy Studies Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering University of Toronto NOTE: This background discussion paper does not represent of- ficial policy and the views expressed herein are not nec- essarily the viewpoint of the Government of Ontario JUNE, 1981 Price: $25.00 ONTARIO'S URANIUM MINING INDUSTRY- PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE A Report Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario Mineral Policy Background Paper No. 13 by O. J. C. Punnalls Professor of Energy Studies Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering Univ.iSity of Toronto January, 1981 Ministry Of H°n- A|an W. Pope ... Minister Natural „ ,. T Mr. W. T. Foster ReSOUrceS Deputy Minister Ontario Parts of this publication ma> be quoted if credit is given to the On- tario Ministry of Natural Resources. It is recommended that refer- ence to this report be made in the following form: Runnalls, J.C., 1981 "'Ontario's Uranium Mining Industry— Past, Present, and Future" Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Mineral Background Paper No. 13 (6/81) Foreword The report "Ontario's Uranium Mining Industry—Past, This report traces the Ontario uranium mining industry Present and Future" is the thirteenth in a series of studies from the first discovery of uranium in Canada north of prepared under the auspices of the Mineral Resources Sault Ste. Marie through the uranium boom of the 1950's Branch, of the Mineral Resources Group, Ontario Ministry when Elliot Lake and Bancroft were developed, the cut- of Natural Resources.
  • Canadian Uranium Production

    Canadian Uranium Production

    CANADIAN URANIUM PRODUCTION From start to finish >the beginning >the ’50s to ’70s >the ’80s to present ff.Map of lJranium Mining Activities in Canada Page 1 of 2 This is Google's cache of http:l/www.ccnr.o1g/uranium_map.html. lt is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 30 Oct 2008 23'.40:46 GMT. The cryrent page could have changed in the meantime. l-qarn more These search terms are highlighted: uranium map canada Text nn!y versiorr **-I..-t';o Unanium Activities hffi in d- #=-"*- fanada €af port Ra*ium *#ff Bske'H: tu,F*t rock # "frffiiurnEity fluff t-atflr tg fiigar tEk+ ] f,learulat e r I qS ett le Yalle Sf+Frq n{lu I ntF H ope Fline t 0pereti,pg I'li;re I [imedD4un l'l i ne l. Pot e nt ial Refinery * 0peratirrg Map of Uranium Mining Activities in Canada adapted from U_ranium: A ffiiscrlssiclrl fireirie by Gordon Edwards et al published by the National Film Board of Canada I Uranium Sub-I]ir*ct*r]'l I f.'f,Jfu{FLnTH I}{&gC,'tr'{}RY ] http:l1209.85.l73.l04lsearch?q:cache:YrcYBlDPu2MJ:www.ccnr.org/uranium_map.html+... 08.11.04 The beginning • Port Radium (NWT) – Discovered 1932 by Geiger counter – Produced Radium from 1934-1939 – Produced U from 1943 to 1962 (note: US cancelled all U imports from Canada in 1962) Production figures - unknown The ’50s to ’70s • Beaverlodge (SK) » Discovered 1947 by Geiger counter » Produced from 1952 to 1981 • Elliot Lake (ON) » Discovered 1953 by Geiger and scintillation counter » Produced from 1955 to 1996 • Cluff Lake (SK) » Discovered 1960 by scintillometer » Produced from 1980 to 2002 Athabasca l,akelorth Project RB1 and RB2 Claim Blocks Beaverlodge Uranium Distr...Page 47 of I22 8.4 Past Production from the Beaverlodge District, and RBI and RB2 Blocks The Beaverlodge Uranium District contains literally hundreds of uranium showings and occurrences (Beck, 1969; Tremblay, 1972).
  • Rio Algom Limited

    Rio Algom Limited

    1 1 2 Rio Algom Limited: 3 Application for the renewal of its 4 Class 1B Waste Facility Operating 5 Licence 6 7 05-H18.1 / 05-H18.1A 8 Oral presentation by 9 Rio Algom Limited 10 11 MS. WIBER: Thank you, Madam President. 12 Hello to the Commission Members. My name is Maxine Wiber, 13 Vice-President of Closed Mines. I’m an officer and 14 director of Rio Algom Limited. To my right is Art Coggan. 15 He is Projects Manager, and you have met Art before, I 16 think, at least year’s hearing. Art is actually taking 17 retirement and helping us through the transition to our 18 new manager, Debbie Berthelot, on my left. 19 Debbie is familiar with Elliot Lake from 20 past experience, has a strong technical background and is 21 really well suited for the position of Manager of 22 Reclamation for Elliot Lake, and I am delighted to 23 introduce Debbie to you today as well. Debbie and Art 24 will assist in answering questions of the Commission as 25 they come up. 2 1 Today we are here to present our submission 2 for renewal of our licence for an indefinite term for the 3 operation, care and maintenance of the Elliot Lake 4 properties. The physical work of reclamation has been 5 finished now for about five years and during that period 6 we have been able to show data that demonstrates the 7 performance of the systems, improvements in environment 8 quality, and these things are supporting, I think, our 9 indefinite term.
  • Current Expansion of Th Ellio

    Current Expansion of Th Ellio

    IN[S-mf _- CURRENT EXPANSION OF TH ELLIO BY: 6. STENNING, P. ENG. 'IANAGER OF ENGINEERING SERVICES OENISON MINES LIMITED ELLIOT LAKE, ONTARIO PRESENTED TO: 22N0 AMNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CANADIAN NtiaEAR ASSOCIATION TORONTO, ONTARIO TUESDAY 8 JUNE Î982 J ABSTRACT The Elliot Lake mines are located in Northern Ontario, on the north shore of Lake Huron and along the edge of the Quirke syncline, covering . an area of some thirty square miles. Mining operations in this area were started in the mid-1950's and were severely restricted during the 1960's. Starting in 1973, Rio Algom's Quirke Mine and Denison, the only mines remaining in operation, started to make plans to expand. It was planned to increase production from a total of 13,400 tpd (milled) to approximately 30,000 tpd (milled), which required the re-opening of the Panel and Stanleigh Mines of the Rio Algom group, and the Stanrock-CanMet area at Denison. The first phase of the expansion was preceded by extensive public hearings before an Environmental Assessment Board. Hearings lasted approxi- mately 30 months, and covered every aspect of environmental conditions, assessment of community needs, a review of current and proposed mining methods, current mill process operations and alternatives and a thorough analysis of tailings disposal plans with discussion of long term strategies. Presentations were made by the mining companies, federal and provincial agencies, special Interest groups, and the public at large. More specifically, the expansion required an increase of production at the Rio Algom Quirke Mine from 4,500 to 7,000 tpd (milled), and the dewatering and re-opening of the Panel mine and mill for production at a rate of 3,300 tpd, with an alternate process in the mill operation.