CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Environmental

Manhattan City Limits City of Manhattan Boundary Roads Rivers and Water Features

Aerial: 2018 Pictometry 0 3,000 6,000 12,000 Data: Riley County GIS (exported 5/14/2019), Pottawatomie County Data Sources: City of Manhattan, Riley County GIS ¯ Feet

X:\GIS_BASE_MAP\MapDatabase\manhattan_ctybnd\City_Limits_small_5_29_2019.mxd Map produced by: Julie.Peterson, 5/29/2019 Map lasted saved on: 5/29/2019 by Julie.Peterson Parcel extents are approximate

County Map | Kansas Radon Program

Kansas Certified Contractors County Map FAQ Fact Sheets & Videos County Map Contacts Training Workshops Radon in New Homes Radon in Schools Links Newsletter

Kansas Radon Program Average Radon Level = 4.6 pCi/L Engineering Extension Maximum Reported Radon Level = 1,121.6 pCi/L 2323 Anderson Ave., Suite 300 Total Number of Measurements = 161,690 Kansas State University Total Measurements 4 pCi/L or greater = 62,555 Manhattan, KS 66502 Total Measurements 20 pCi/L or greater = 3,296 1-800-693-5343 Tota Estimated Mitigation (2005-2018) = 33,066 785-532-6026 / Fax: 785-532-6952

Copyright 2018, KDHE and Kansas State University. Caution: This map has been produced using data collected by Radon Test Kits available at Kansas KDHE through June of 2018. As further data becomes available, revision will be necessary. This map is provided County Extension Offices. Find your free of charge to the public and is generated for study purposes only. Permission is hereby given to reproduce this office here: map provided it is reproduced in its entirety without modification. This map cannot be used to characterize or predict indoor radon levels at any specific area or location. Measurement must be performed to determine radon levels in any given residence or building. Contact the Kansas Radon Program at (800) 693-5343.

Additional maps of radon and Kansas geology, lung cancer incidence, and smoking prevalence

Download All County Maps (zip file)

* Abbreviations:

Abbreviation County AN Anderson CK Cherokee CQ Chautauqua DK Dickinson DP Doniphan JF Jefferson LV Leavenworth PT Pottawatomie SN Shawnee WB Wabaunsee WY Wyandotte

Engineering Extension | College of Engineering | Kansas State University

https://kansasradonprogram.org/county-map[3/25/2020 9:39:40 AM] Air Quality (CEST and EA) General Requirements Legislation Regulation The Clean Air Act is administered by the Clean Air Act (42 USC 40 CFR Parts 6, 51 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7401 et seq.) as and 93 (EPA), which sets national standards on amended particularly ambient pollutants. In addition, the Clean Section 176(c) and (d) Air Act is administered by States, which (42 USC 7506(c) and (d)) must develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to regulate their state air quality. Projects funded by HUD must demonstrate that they conform to the appropriate SIP. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/air-quality Scope of Work

1. Does your project include new construction or conversion of land use facilitating the development of public, commercial, or industrial facilities OR five or more dwelling units?

☐ Yes  Continue to Question 2.

☒ No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination.

Air Quality Attainment Status of Project’s County or Air Quality Management District

2. Is your project’s air quality management district or county in non-attainment or maintenance status for any criteria pollutants? Follow the link below to determine compliance status of project county or air quality management district: http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/ https://www.epa.gov/green-book ☐ No, project’s county or air quality management district is in attainment status for all criteria pollutants  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination.

☐ Yes, project’s management district or county is in non-attainment or maintenance status for one or more criteria pollutants. Describe the findings:

 Continue to Question 3.

3. Determine the estimated emissions levels of your project for each of those criteria pollutants that are in non-attainment or maintenance status on your project area. Will your project exceed any of the de minimis or threshold emissions levels of non- attainment and maintenance level pollutants or exceed the screening levels established by the state or air quality management district? ☐ No, the project will not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions levels or screening levels  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Explain how you determined that the project would not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions.

☐ Yes, the project exceeds de minimis emissions levels or screening levels.  Continue to Question 4. Explain how you determined that the project would not exceed de minimis or threshold emissions in the Worksheet Summary.

4. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

Riley County, Kansas is a Radon Zone 1 based on the Kansas – EPA Map of Radon Zones. Per protocol with The City of Manhattan Community Development Housing Rehabilitation Program, applicable housing rehab projects will be tested for elevated levels of radon gas that exceed 4.0 pCi/L. When the individual test results are received it is then determined if a Radon Mitigation System will need to be installed in the home. If a radon mitigation system is installed, it is required to have a secondary test performed in order to determine the functionality of the newly installed mitigation system.

Asbestos: Every project site will be assessed and necessary remediation will be included in the description of work to be completed. If found, asbestos will be removed prior to any other work being completed.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Coastal Barrier Resources System Ecological Services CBRS Menu Official CBRS Maps CBRS Home The Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) of 1982 and subsequent amendments established the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS). The CBRS consists of relatively undeveloped coastal barriers and other areas located the Legislation & Testimony Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Great Lakes, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico coasts. The CBRS currently includes 585 System Units, which comprise nearly 1.4 million acres of land and associated aquatic habitat. There are also 277 "Otherwise Historical Changes Protected Areas," a category of coastal barriers that are mostly already held for conservation and/or recreation purposes that include an additional 2.1 million acres of land and associated aquatic habitat. The CBRS units are identified and CBRA Prohibitions depicted on a series of maps entitled “John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System.” These maps are controlling and indicate which lands are affected by the CBRA. The maps are maintained by the Department of the Interior through the U.S. Flood Insurance Fish and Wildlife Service.

Official Maps and Data +

Boundary Modifications Viewing an Official CBRS Map An official CBRS map can be obtained through the CBRS Mapper by following these steps: Mapping Projects + • Locate the area of interest in the mapper • Click on the location of interest. A pop-up window will open providing information for the area. CBRS Documentation • In the pop-up window, click on the map link. A PDF of the official map will then open in a separate tab or download.

Project Consultations + Alternatively, if the name or number of the CBRS unit is known, then the official CBRS maps can also be found in the table at: https://www.fws.gov/cbra/maps/cbrs/. Help and Contacts

State Locator Maps The below state locator maps show the locations of units in each state and may be helpful in determining a unit number. Frequently Asked Questions Alabama Georgia Massachusetts New Jersey Ohio Texas

Connecticut Louisiana Michigan New York Great Lakes Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Glossary Delaware Maine Minnesota New York Long Island Rhode Island Virginia

Florida Maryland Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Wisconsin

Documents Library

Last updated: November 6, 2019

For CBRA news, sign up for our listserv electronic mailing list

1:25,076,110 0 215 430 860 mi U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coastal Barrier Resources Act Program, Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coastal Barrier Resources Act Program, [email protected] 0 335 670 1,340 km Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community

This map is for general reference only. The Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) boundaries depicted on this map are representations of May 27, 2020 the controlling CBRS boundaries, which are shown on the official maps, accessible at https://www.fws.gov/cbra/maps/index.html. All CBRS related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the CBRS Mapper website. CBRS Units The CBRS Buffer Zone represents the area immediately adjacent to the CBRS boundary where users are advised to contact the Service for an official determination (http://www.fws.gov/cbra/Determinations.html) as to whether the property or project site is located "in" or "out" of the CBRS.

CBRS Units normally extend seaward out to the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS mapper. This page was produced by the CBRS Mapper Coastal Barrier Resources (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD financial assistance may not be Coastal Barrier Resources Act used for most activities in units of (CBRA) of 1982, as amended the Coastal Barrier Resources by the Coastal Barrier System (CBRS). See 16 USC 3504 for Improvement Act of 1990 (16 limitations on federal expenditures USC 3501) affecting the CBRS. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/coastal-barrier-resources

Projects located in the following states must complete this form. Alabama Georgia Massachusetts New Jersey Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Connecticut Louisiana Michigan New York Rhode Island Virginia Delaware Maine Minnesota North Carolina South Carolina Wisconsin Florida Maryland Mississippi Ohio Texas

1. Is the project located in a CBRS Unit? ☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within a CBRS Unit.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 2.

Federal assistance for most activities may not be used at this location. You must either choose an alternate site or cancel the project. In very rare cases, federal monies can be spent within CBRS units for certain exempted activities (e.g., a nature trail), after consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (see 16 USC 3505 for exceptions to limitations

on expenditures).

2. Indicate your selected course of action. ☐ After consultation with the FWS the project was given approval to continue  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map and documentation of a FWS approval.

☐ Project was not given approval Project cannot proceed at this location.

The City of Manhattan CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program Projects are located in a state that does not contain CBR Units. The Manhattan CDBG Housing Rehab projects comply with the Coastal Barrier Resource Act.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

6/18/2018 NOAA Office for Coastal Management | States and Territories Working on Ocean and Coastal Management OFFICE FOR COASTAL MANAGEMENT coast.noaa.gov

Coastal Zone Management Programs

Alabama [#alabama] Alaska (*) [#alaska] American Samoa [#samoa] California [#california] Connecticut [#connecticut] Delaware [#delaware] Florida [#florida] Georgia [#georgia] Guam [#guam] Hawaii [#hawaii] Illinois [#illinois] Indiana [#indiana] Louisiana [#louisiana] Maine [#maine] Maryland [#maryland] Massachusetts [#massachusetts] Michigan [#michigan] Minnesota [#minnesota] Mississippi [#mississippi] New Hampshire [#newhampshire] New Jersey [#newjersey] New York [#newyork] North Carolina [#northcarolina] Northern Mariana Islands [#mariana] Ohio [#ohio] Oregon [#oregon] Pennsylvania [#pennsylvania] Puerto Rico [#puertorico] Rhode Island [#rhodeisland] South Carolina [#southcarolina] Texas [#texas] Virgin Islands [#virginislands] Virginia [#virginia] Washington [#washington] Wisconsin [#wisconsin]

* All 35 coastal and Great Lakes states and territories (with the exception of Alaska) participate in the National Coastal Zone Management Program.

ALABAMA The Alabama Coastal Management Program [http://www.adem.state.al.us/programs/coastal/default.cnt] , approved by NOAA in 1979, is administered by two state agencies:

The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources [http://www.outdooralabama.com/alabama- coastal-area-management-program] is responsible for planning, fiscal management, public education, and research management; and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management [http://adem.alabama.gov/programs/coastal/default.cnt] carries out permitting, regulatory, and enforcement functions.

The primary authority for the coastal management program is the Alabama Coastal Area Act of 1976 (Act 534). The Alabama coastal zone [/czm/media/StateCZBoundaries.pdf] extends inland to the continuous 10-foot contour in Mobile and Baldwin Counties.

ALASKA Alaska withdrew from the voluntary National Coastal Zone Management Program [/czm/about/] on July 1, 2011. Contact NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management for additional information.

AMERICAN SAMOA The American Samoa Coastal Management Program [http://www.doc.as/resource-management/ascmp/] , approved by NOAA in 1980, is led by the American Samoa Department of Commerce. The coastal program has developed a unique approach that incorporates both western and traditional systems of management. The American Samoa Coastal Management Act provides the primary authority for the program. American Samoa’s coastal zone boundary [/czm/media/StateCZBoundaries.pdf] consists of seven islands, totaling roughly 77 square miles, with a coastline of 126 miles.

CALIFORNIA The California Coastal Management Program, approved by NOAA in 1978, is administered by three state agencies: https://coast.noaa.gov/czm/mystate/ 1/7 Coastal6/18/2018 Management Council,NOAA with Office representatives for Coastal Management from | localStates governments,and Territories Working state on Oceanagencies, and Coastal Native Management American tribes, and interest groups. The council sets the policy direction for the program. The Wisconsin coastal zone [/czm/media/StateCZBoundaries.pdf] comprises the 15 counties fronting Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, and Green Bay.

For more information, contact us [https://coast.noaa.gov/contactform/] .

About the National Program [/czm/about/]

States and Territories [/czm/mystate/]

Coastal Zone Management Act [/czm/act]

Regulations [http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx? SID=73fa77136a5eecb25a52b3ef02368ecb&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title15/15cfr923_main_02.tpl]

National Program Funding Summary [/czm/media/funding-summary.pdf]

Program Guidance [/czm/guidance/]

National Program Publications [/czm/publications/]

Evaluations [/czm/evaluations/]

Performance Measures [/czm/performance/]

https://coast.noaa.gov/czm/mystate/ 7/7 Coastal Zone Management Act (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Federal assistance to applicant Coastal Zone Management 15 CFR Part 930 agencies for activities affecting Act (16 USC 1451-1464), any coastal use or resource is particularly section 307(c) granted only when such and (d) (16 USC 1456(c) and activities are consistent with (d)) federally approved State Coastal Zone Management Act Plans. References https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/coastal-zone-management

Projects located in the following states must complete this form. Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi Ohio Texas Alaska Georgia Maine New Hampshire Oregon Virgin Islands American Guam Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Virginia Samona California Hawaii Massachusetts New York Puerto Rico Washington Connecticut Illinois Michigan North Carolina Rhode Island Wisconsin Delaware Indiana Minnesota Northern South Carolina Mariana Islands

1. Is the project located in, or does it affect, a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Management Plan?

☐Yes  Continue to Question 2.

☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within a Coastal Zone.

2. Does this project include activities that are subject to state review?

☐Yes  Continue to Question 3.

☐No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination.

3. Has this project been determined to be consistent with the State Coastal Management Program? ☐Yes, with mitigation.  Continue to Question 4.

☐Yes, without mitigation.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination.

☐No, project must be canceled. Project cannot proceed at this location.

4. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the State Coastal Management Program letter of consistency) and any other documentation used to make your determination.

The City of Manhattan CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program Projects are located in a state that does not participate in the Coastal Zone Management Program. Based on this information along with additional supplemental documents, Manhattan CDBG Housing Rehab projects comply with the Coastal Zone Management Program.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Endangered Species Act (CEST and EA) General requirements ESA Legislation Regulations Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) The Endangered 50 CFR Part mandates that federal agencies ensure that Species Act of 1973 (16 402 actions that they authorize, fund, or carry out U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); shall not jeopardize the continued existence of particularly section 7 federally listed plants and animals or result in (16 USC 1536). the adverse modification or destruction of designated critical habitat. Where their actions may affect resources protected by the ESA, agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (“FWS” and “NMFS” or “the Services”). References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/endangered-species

1. Does the project involve any activities that have the potential to affect species or habitats? ☒No, the project will have No Effect due to the nature of the activities involved in the project.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination.

☐No, the project will have No Effect based on a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement, programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office. Explain your determination:

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination.

☐Yes, the activities involved in the project have the potential to affect species and/or habitats.  Continue to Question 2.

2. Are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area? Obtain a list of protected species from the Services. This information is available on the FWS Website or you may contact your local FWS and/or NMFS offices directly.

☐No, the project will have No Effect due to the absence of federally listed species and designated critical habitat.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Documentation may include letters from the Services, species lists from the Services’ websites, surveys or other documents and analysis showing that there are no species in the action area.

☐Yes, there are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area.  Continue to Question 3.

3. What effects, if any, will your project have on federally listed species or designated critical habitat? ☐No Effect: Based on the specifics of both the project and any federally listed species in the action area, you have determined that the project will have absolutely no effect on listed species or critical habitat.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Documentation should include a species list and explanation of your conclusion, and may require maps, photographs, and surveys as appropriate.

☐May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect: Any effects that the project may have on federally listed species or critical habitats would be beneficial, discountable, or insignificant.  Continue to Question 4, Informal Consultation.

☐Likely to Adversely Affect: The project may have negative effects on one or more listed species or critical habitat.  Continue to Question 5, Formal Consultation.

4. Informal Consultation is required Section 7 of ESA (16 USC. 1536) mandates consultation to resolve potential impacts to endangered and threatened species and critical habitats. If a HUD-assisted project may affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, then compliance is required with Section 7. See 50 CFR Part 402 Subpart B Consultation Procedures.

Did the Service(s) concur with the finding that the project is Not Likely to Adversely Affect?

☐Yes, the Service(s) concurred with the finding.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to Question 6 and provide the following: (1) A biological evaluation or equivalent document (2) Concurrence(s) from FWS and/or NMFS (3) Any other documentation of informal consultation

Exception: If finding was made based on procedures provided by a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement, programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office, provide whatever documentation is mandated by that agreement.

☐No, the Service(s) did not concur with the finding.  Continue to Question 5.

5. Formal consultation is required Section 7 of ESA (16 USC 1536) mandates consultation to resolve potential impacts to federally listed endangered and threatened species and critical habitats. If a HUD assisted project may affect any endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, then compliance is required with Section 7. See 50 CFR Part 402 Subpart B Consultation Procedures.

 Once consultation is complete, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to Question 6 and provide the following: (1) A biological assessment, evaluation, or equivalent document (2) Biological opinion(s) issued by FWS and/or NMFS (3) Any other documentation of formal consultation

6. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that will be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. ☐Mitigation as follows will be implemented:

☐No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here:

The project sites will have no effect on critical habitats or endangered species as the project

sites only include single family owned home renovations to existing homes within city limits

that are known to not have endangered species.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Kansas Ecological Services Field Office 2609 Anderson Avenue Manhattan, KS 66502-2801 Phone: (785) 539-3474 Fax: (785) 539-8567

In Reply Refer To: March 23, 2020 Consultation Code: 06E21000-2019-SLI-0826 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 Project Name: CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program

Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. 03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 2

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/esa_section7_handbook.pdf

Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.)(https://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ eagle-management.php), and wind projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/ eagleconservationplanguidance.pdf). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (https://www.fws.gov/ecological-services/energy-development/wind.html) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: https:// www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance.php

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

▪ Official Species List ▪ USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries ▪ Migratory Birds ▪ Wetlands

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 1

Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Kansas Ecological Services Field Office 2609 Anderson Avenue Manhattan, KS 66502-2801 (785) 539-3474

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 2

Project Summary Consultation Code: 06E21000-2019-SLI-0826

Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521

Project Name: CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program

Project Type: Federal Grant / Loan Related

Project Description: The City intends to rehabilitate single family homes owned by LMI families. Homes in flood plains, or near explosive or contaminated sites are not eligible. Homes will be tested for Lead, Radon and Asbestos when appropriate and issues addressed if needed. Rehabilitation will include livability, safety and accessibility improvements, and each location will be reviewed and qualified by the Housing Rehabilitation Inspector. • Comprehensive Rehab Projects will not exceed $24,999; • Emergency and Accessibility Projects will not exceed $5,000; • Mobile Home Emergency and Accessibility Projects will not exceed $2,500.

Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/place/39.1928076006305N96.5922575753755W

Counties: Pottawatomie, KS | Riley, KS

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 3

Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

Mammals NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045

Birds NAME STATUS Least Tern Sterna antillarum Endangered Population: interior pop. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8505

Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 4

Fishes NAME STATUS Topeka Shiner Notropis topeka (=tristis) Endangered Population: Wherever found, except where listed as an experimental population There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4122

Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 1

USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.

THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 1

Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.

BREEDING NAME SEASON American Golden-plover Pluvialis dominica Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska.

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Oct 15 This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention to Aug 31 because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 2

BREEDING NAME SEASON Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Oct 10 and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399

Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds May 20 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31 and Alaska.

Buff-breasted Sandpiper Calidris subruficollis Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9488

Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 21 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 20 and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974

Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20 and Alaska.

Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Breeds This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention elsewhere because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680

Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Breeds May 1 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31 and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3941

Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska.

Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20 and Alaska.

Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 3

BREEDING NAME SEASON Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31 and Alaska.

Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10 and Alaska.

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska.

Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Breeds This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere and Alaska.

Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31 and Alaska.

Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to interpret this report.

Probability of Presence ( )

Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 4

probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.

Survey Effort ( ) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.

Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.

probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC American Golden- plover BCC Rangewide (CON) Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Black-billed Cuckoo BCC Rangewide (CON) Bobolink BCC Rangewide (CON) Buff-breasted Sandpiper BCC Rangewide (CON) Cerulean Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON)

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 5

SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Eastern Whip-poor- will BCC Rangewide (CON) Golden Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable

Henslow's Sparrow BCC Rangewide (CON)

Hudsonian Godwit BCC Rangewide (CON)

Kentucky Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON)

Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) Prothonotary Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) Rusty Blackbird BCC Rangewide (CON) Semipalmated Sandpiper BCC Rangewide (CON) Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide (CON)

Additional information can be found using the following links:

▪ Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php ▪ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/ management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php ▪ Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/ management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf

Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 6

in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.

Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 7

Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:

1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.

Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 8 contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

03/23/2020 Event Code: 06E21000-2020-E-01521 1

Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.

Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.

FRESHWATER POND ▪ Palustrine

RIVERINE ▪ Riverine

Manhattan Low-Moderate Income Neighborhoods 2-5 2011-2015 ACS Census Tract - Block Group Numbers N 2-4

2-4 2-5 2-4 Pottawattomie Co. 1-2

13.02-1

11-3 2-2 2-3 11-1

13.01-2 2-3 11-2 Riley Co.

2-1 3.04-2 2-3 13.01-2 3.04-1 11-3 6-4 5-4 3.03-1 6-3 Pottawattomie Co. 3.03-2 1-4 6-2 5-3 5-1 3.04-3 5-2 8.01-2 8.01-4 6-1 7-2 8.01 7-4 6-5 -1 8.01 8.01-5 -3 Riley Co. 7-1 8.02-2 9-4 6-5 8.02-1 7-3

9-3

6-1

9-5 9-3

6-5 Legend 9-5 LMI <51% LMI >51% City Boundary 9-2 Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Environmental Justice (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Determine if the project Executive Order 12898 creates adverse environmental impacts upon a low-income or minority community. If it does, engage the community in meaningful participation about mitigating the impacts or move the project. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/environmental-justice

HUD strongly encourages starting the Environmental Justice analysis only after all other laws and authorities, including Environmental Assessment factors if necessary, have been completed.

1. Were any adverse environmental impacts identified in any other compliance review portion of this project’s total environmental review? ☐Yes  Continue to Question 2.

☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

2. Were these adverse environmental impacts disproportionately high for low-income and/or minority communities? ☐Yes Explain:

 Continue to Question 3. Provide any supporting documentation.

☐No Explain:

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary and provide any supporting documentation.

3. All adverse impacts should be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. ☐Mitigation as follows will be implemented:

 Continue to Question 4.

☐No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here:

 Continue to Question 4.

4. Describe how the affected low-income or minority community was engaged or meaningfully involved in the decision on what mitigation actions, if any, will be taken.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary and provide any supporting documentation.

The CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program assists LMI homeowners with repairs that they are not able to either make or afford themselves. These projects are in single family residence and will not increase the structure’s footprint or the population density of the unit. The projects will enhance livability and accessibility for LMI families, and any project sites that create identified adverse environmental impacts will not be considered. Based on the City of Manhattan CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Policy, the projects will comply with the Environmental Justice Regulations.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Farmlands Protection (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Farmland Protection Farmland Protection Policy 7 CFR Part 658 Policy Act (FPPA) discourages Act of 1981 (7 U.S.C. 4201 federal activities that would et seq.) convert farmland to nonagricultural purposes. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/farmlands-protection

1. Does your project include any activities, including new construction, acquisition of undeveloped land or conversion that could convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use? ☐Yes  Continue to Question 2. ☒No Explain how you determined that agricultural land would not be converted:

The CDBG Housing Rehab projects are located in developed neighborhoods

within Manhattan City limits. No CDBG Housing Rehab project will be

considered if it is outside the city limits of Manhattan per policy. Therefore

the project will not convert from agricultural land to non-agricultural land.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting your determination.

2. Does “important farmland,” including prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide or local importance regulated under the Farmland Protection Policy Act, occur on the project site? You may use the links below to determine important farmland occurs on the project site:

. Utilize USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) Web Soil Survey http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm . Check with your city or county’s planning department and ask them to document if the project is on land regulated by the FPPA (zoning important farmland as non-agricultural does not exempt it from FPPA requirements) . Contact NRCS at the local USDA service center http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs or your NRCS state soil scientist http://soils.usda.gov/contact/state_offices/ for assistance

☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 3.

3. Consider alternatives to completing the project on important farmland and means of avoiding impacts to important farmland. . Complete form AD-1006, “Farmland Conversion Impact Rating” http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045394.pdf and contact the state soil scientist before sending it to the local NRCS District Conservationist. (NOTE: for corridor type projects, use instead form NRCS-CPA-106, "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating for Corridor Type Projects: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045395.pdf.) . Work with NRCS to minimize the impact of the project on the protected farmland. When you have finished with your analysis, return a copy of form AD-1006 (or form NRCS-CPA-106 if applicable) to the USDA-NRCS State Soil Scientist or his/her designee informing them of your determination.

Document your conclusion: ☐Project will proceed with mitigation. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide form AD-1006 and all other documents used to make your determination.

☐Project will proceed without mitigation. Explain why mitigation will not be made here:

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide form AD-1006 and all other documents used to make your determination.

The CDBG Housing Rehab project sites involved are existing single family homes located in developed residential neighborhoods within the city limits of Manhattan. Therefore Housing Rehab is not subject to the FPPA, per 7 CFR Part 658. No CDBG Housing Rehab project will be considered outside the city limits of Manhattan per policy.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Manhattan Low-Moderate Income Neighborhoods 2-5 2011-2015 ACS Census Tract - Block Group Numbers N 2-4

2-4 2-5 2-4 Pottawattomie Co. 1-2

13.02-1

11-3 2-2 2-3 11-1

13.01-2 2-3 11-2 Riley Co.

2-1 3.04-2 2-3 13.01-2 3.04-1 11-3 6-4 5-4 3.03-1 6-3 Pottawattomie Co. 3.03-2 1-4 6-2 5-3 5-1 3.04-3 5-2 8.01-2 8.01-4 6-1 7-2 8.01 7-4 6-5 -1 8.01 8.01-5 -3 Riley Co. 7-1 8.02-2 9-4 6-5 8.02-1 7-3

9-3

6-1

9-5 9-3

§ 658.2 Definitions. (i) Acquisition of land or easements (a) Farmland means prime or unique for the project had occurred or all re- farmlands as defined in section quired Federal agency planning docu- 1540(c)(1) of the Act or farmland that is ments and steps were completed and determined by the appropriate state or accepted, endorsed, or approved by the unit of local government agency or appropriate agency; agencies with concurrence of the Sec- (ii) A final environmental impact retary to be farmland of statewide of statement was filed with the Environ- local importance. ‘‘Farmland’’ does not mental Protection Agency or an envi- include land already in or committed ronmental assessment was completed to urban development or water storage. and a finding of no significant impact Farmland ‘‘already in’’ urban develop- was executed by the appropriate agen- ment or water storage includes all such cy official; and land with a density of 30 structures per (iii) The engineering or architectural 40-acre area. Farmland already in design had begun or such services had urban development also includes lands been secured by contract. The phrase identified as ‘‘urbanized area’’ (UA) on ‘‘undertaking, financing, or assisting the Census Bureau Map, or as urban construction or improvement projects’’ area mapped with a ‘‘tint overprint’’ on includes providing loan guarantees or the USGS topographical maps, or as loan insurance for such projects and in- ‘‘urban-built-up’’ on the USDA Impor- tant Farmland Maps. Areas shown as cludes the acquisition, management white on the USDA Important Farm- and disposal of land or facilities that a land Maps are not ‘‘farmland’’ and, Federal agency obtains as the result of therefore, are not subject to the Act. foreclosure or other actions taken Farmland ‘‘committed to urban devel- under a loan or other financial assist- opment or water storage’’ includes all ance provided by the agency directly such land that receives a combined and specifically for that property. For score of 160 points or less from the land the purposes of this section, the phrase evaluation and site assessment cri- ‘‘acquiring, managing, or disposing of teria. Federal lands and facilities’’ refers to (b) Federal agency means a depart- lands and facilities that are acquired, ment, agency, independent commis- managed, or used by a Federal agency sion, or other unit of the Federal Gov- specifically in support of a Federal ac- ernment. tivity or program, such as national (c) Federal program means those ac- parks, national forests, or military tivities or responsibilities of a Federal bases, and does not refer to lands and agency that involve undertaking, fi- facilities that are acquired by a Fed- nancing, or assisting construction or eral agency as the incidental result of improvement projects or acquiring, actions by the agency that give the managing, or disposing of Federal agency temporary custody or owner- lands and facilities. ship of the lands or facilities, such as (1) The term ‘‘Federal program’’ does acquisition pursuant to a lien for delin- not include: quent taxes, the exercise of con- (i) Federal permitting, licensing, or servatorship or receivership authority, rate approval programs for activities or the exercise of civil or criminal law on private or non-Federal lands; and (ii) Construction or improvement enforcement forfeiture or seizure au- projects that were beyond the planning thority. stage and were in either the active de- (d) State or local government policies or sign or construction state on August 4, programs to protect farmland include: 1984. Zoning to protect farmland; agricul- (2) For the purposes of this section, a tural land protection provisions of a project is considered to be ‘‘beyond the comprehensive land use plan which has planning stage and in either the active been adopted or reviewed in its en- design or construction state on August tirety by the unit of local government 4, 1984’’ if, on or before that date, ac- in whose jurisdiction it is operative tual construction of the project had within 10 years preceding proposed im- commenced or: plementation of the particular Federal

584

VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:23 Feb 17, 2010 Jkt 220017 PO 00000 Frm 00594 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220017.XXX 220017 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA § 658.3

program; completed purchase or acqui- or local government planning offices sition of development rights; com- can also provide this assistance. pleted purchase or acquisition of con- (b) Acquisition or use of farmland by servation easements; prescribed proce- a Federal agency for national defense dures for assessing agricultural viabil- purposes is exempted by section 1547(b) ity of sites proposed for conversion; of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4208(b). completed agricultural districting and (c) The Act and these regulations do capital investments to protect farm- not authorize the Federal Government land. in any way to regulate the use of pri- (e) Private programs to protect farm- vate or non-Federal land, or in any way land means programs for the protection affect the property rights of owners of of farmland which are pursuant to and such land. In cases where either a pri- consistent with State and local govern- vate party or a non-Federal unit of ment policies or programs to protect government applies for Federal assist- farmland of the affected State and unit ance to convert farmland to a non- of local government, but which are op- agricultural use, the Federal agency erated by a nonprofit corporation, should use the criteria set forth in this foundation, association, conservancy, part to identify and take into account district, or other not-for-profit organi- any adverse effects on farmland of the zation existing under State or Federal assistance requested and develop alter- laws. Private programs to protect native actions that would avoid or farmland may include: (1) Acquiring mitigate such adverse effects. If, after and holding development rights in consideration of the adverse effects and farmland and (2) facilitating the trans- suggested alternatives, the landowners fer of development rights of farmland. want to proceed with conversion, the (f) Site means the location(s) that Federal agency, on the basis of the would be converted by the proposed ac- analysis set forth in § 658.4 and any tion(s). agency policies or procedures for im- (g) Unit of local government means the plementing the Act, may provide or government of a county, municipality, deny the requested assistance. Only as- town, township, village, or other unit sistance and actions that would con- of general government below the State vert farmland to nonagricultural uses level, or a combination of units of local are subject to this Act. Assistance and government acting through an actions related to the purchase, main- areawide agency under a State law or tenance, renovation, or replacement of an agreement for the formulation of re- existing structures and sites converted gional development policies and plans. prior to the time of an application for assistance from a Federal agency, in- [49 FR 27724, July 5, 1984, as amended at 59 cluding assistance and actions related FR 31117, June 17, 1994] to the construction of minor new ancil- lary structures (such as garages or § 658.3 Applicability and exemptions. sheds), are not subject to the Act. (a) Section 1540(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. (d) Section 1548 of the Act, as amend- 4201(b), states that the purpose of the ed, 7 U.S.C. 4209, states that the Act Act is to minimize the extent to which shall not be deemed to provide a basis Federal programs contribute to the un- for any action, either legal or equi- necessary and irreversible conversion table, by any person or class of persons of farmland to nonagricultural uses. challenging a Federal project, pro- Conversion of farmland to non- gram, or other activity that may affect agricultural uses does not include the farmland. Neither the Act nor this construction of on-farm structures nec- rule, therefore, shall afford any basis essary for farm operations. Federal for such an action. However, as further agencies can obtain assistance from provided in section 1548, the governor USDA in determining whether a pro- of an affected state, where a state pol- posed location or site meets the Act’s icy or program exists to protect farm- definition of farmland. The USDA Nat- land, may bring an action in the Fed- ural Resources Conservation Service eral district court of the district where (NRCS) field office serving the area a Federal program is proposed to en- will provide the assistance. Many State force the requirements of section 1541

585

VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:23 Feb 17, 2010 Jkt 220017 PO 00000 Frm 00595 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220017.XXX 220017 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer Page 1 of 1

FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer with Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS

+ Find address or place  –

1mi1mi1mi -96.634 39.211 Degrees https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa9cd&extent=-96.72800821289034,39.1... 3/24/2020 Flood Insurance (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Certain types of federal financial assistance may Flood Disaster 24 CFR 50.4(b)(1) not be used in floodplains unless the community Protection Act of and 24 CFR participates in National Flood Insurance Program 1973 as amended 58.6(a) and (b); and flood insurance is both obtained and (42 USC 4001-4128) 24 CFR 55.1(b). maintained. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/flood-insurance

1. Does this project involve financial assistance for construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of a mobile home, building, or insurable personal property? ☐No. This project does not require flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance.  Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☒Yes  Continue to Question 2.

2. Provide a FEMA/FIRM map showing the site. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designates floodplains. The FEMA Map Service Center provides this information in the form of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). For projects in areas not mapped by FEMA, use the best available information to determine floodplain information. Include documentation, including a discussion of why this is the best available information for the site. Provide FEMA/FIRM floodplain zone designation, panel number, and date within your documentation.

Is the structure, part of the structure, or insurable property located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area? ☒No  Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 3.

3. Is the community participating in the National Flood Insurance Program or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards?

☒Yes, the community is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. For loans, loan insurance or loan guarantees, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the term of the loan. For grants and other non-loan forms of financial assistance, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the life of the building irrespective of the transfer of ownership. The amount of coverage must equal the total project cost or the maximum coverage limit of the National Flood Insurance Program, whichever is less Provide a copy of the flood insurance policy declaration or a paid receipt for the current annual flood insurance premium and a copy of the application for flood insurance.  Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐Yes, less than one year has passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards. If less than one year has passed since notification of Special Flood Hazards, no flood Insurance is required.  Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐No. The community is not participating, or its participation has been suspended. Federal assistance may not be used at this location. Cancel the project at this location.

Each location will be evaluated on Tier 2 Level Review. Locations within a flood plain or requiring Flood Insurance will be ineligible for this project. FEMA FIRM Panels will be uploaded for each approved project site.

FIRM Panels for applicable areas within Manhattan City Limits include Panels numbered: 20161C0334G, 20161C0335G, 20161C0342G, 20161C03434G, 20161C0351G, 20161C0352G, 20161C0353G, 20161C0354G, 20161C0358G, 20161C0361G, 20161C0362G, 20161C0366G.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Floodplain Management (CEST and EA) General Requirements Legislation Regulation Executive Order 11988, Executive Order 11988 24 CFR 55 Floodplain Management, requires Federal activities to avoid impacts to floodplains and to avoid direct and indirect support of floodplain development to the extent practicable. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/floodplain-management

1. Does 24 CFR 55.12(c) exempt this project from compliance with HUD’s floodplain management regulations in Part 55? ☐ Yes Provide the applicable citation at 24 CFR 55.12(c) here. If project is exempt under 55.12(c)(7) or (8), provide supporting documentation.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☒ No  Continue to Question 2.

2. Provide a FEMA/FIRM or ABFE map showing the site. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designates floodplains. The FEMA Map Service Center provides this information in the form of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) or Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs). For projects in areas not mapped by FEMA, use the best available information to determine floodplain information. Include documentation, including a discussion of why this is the best available information for the site.

Does your project occur in a floodplain? ☒ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐ Yes

Select the applicable floodplain using the FEMA map or the best available information: ☐ Floodway  Continue to Question 3, Floodways

☐ Coastal High Hazard Area (V Zone)  Continue to Question 4, Coastal High Hazard Areas

☐ 500-year floodplain (B Zone or shaded X Zone)  Continue to Question 5, 500-year Floodplains

☐ 100-year floodplain (A Zone)  The 8-Step Process is required. Continue to Question 6, 8-Step Process

3. Floodways Is this a functionally dependent use? ☐ Yes The 8-Step Process is required. Work with your HUD FEO to determine a way to satisfactorily continue with this project. Provide a completed 8-Step Process, including the early public notice and the final notice. Continue to Question 6, 8-Step Process

☐ No Federal assistance may not be used at this location unless a 55.12(c) exception applies. You must either choose an alternate site or cancel the project at this location.

4. Coastal High Hazard Area Is this a critical action? ☐ Yes Critical actions are prohibited in coastal high hazard areas. Federal assistance may not be used at this location. Unless the action is excepted at 24 CFR 55.12(c), you must either choose an alternate site or cancel the project.

☐ No Does this action include construction that is not a functionally dependent use, existing construction (including improvements), or reconstruction following destruction caused by a disaster? ☐ Yes, there is new construction. New construction is prohibited in V Zones ((24 CFR 55.1(c)(3)).

☐ No, this action concerns only a functionally dependent use, existing construction(including improvements), or reconstruction following destruction caused by a disaster. This construction must have met FEMA elevation and construction standards for a coastal high hazard area or other standards applicable at the time of construction.  Continue to Question 6, 8-Step Process

5. 500-year Floodplain Is this a critical action? ☐ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 6, 8-Step Process

6. 8-Step Process. Does the 8-Step Process apply? Select one of the following options: ☐ 8-Step Process applies. Provide a completed 8-Step Process, including the early public notice and the final notice.  Continue to Question 7, Mitigation

☐ 5-Step Process is applicable per 55.12(a)(1-3). Provide documentation of 5-Step Process. Select the applicable citation: ☐ 55.12(a)(1) HUD actions involving the disposition of HUD-acquired multifamily housing projects or “bulk sales” of HUD-acquired one- to four-family properties in communities that are in the Regular Program of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and in good standing (i.e., not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24). ☐ 55.12(a)(2) HUD's actions under the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701) for the purchase or refinancing of existing multifamily housing projects, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board and care facilities, and intermediate care facilities, in communities that are in good standing under the NFIP. ☐ 55.12(a)(3) HUD's or the recipient’s actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or improvement of existing multifamily housing projects, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board and care facilities, intermediate care facilities, and one- to four-family properties, in communities that are in the Regular Program of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and are in good standing, provided that the number of units is not increased more than 20 percent, the action does not involve a conversion from nonresidential to residential land use, the action does not meet the thresholds for “substantial improvement” under § 55.2(b)(10), and the footprint of the structure and paved areas is not significantly increased. ☐ 55.12(a)(4) HUD’s (or the recipient’s) actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or improvement of existing nonresidential buildings and structures, in communities that are in the Regular Program of the NFIP and are in good standing, provided that the action does not meet the thresholds for “substantial improvement” under § 55.2(b)(10) and that the footprint of the structure and paved areas is not significantly increased.  Continue to Question 7, Mitigation

☐ 8-Step Process is inapplicable per 55.12(b)(1-4). Select the applicable citation: ☐ 55.12(b)(1) HUD's mortgage insurance actions and other financial assistance for the purchasing, mortgaging or refinancing of existing one- to four-family properties in communities that are in the Regular Program of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and in good standing (i.e., not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24), where the action is not a critical action and the property is not located in a floodway or coastal high hazard area. ☐ 55.12(b)(2) Financial assistance for minor repairs or improvements on one- to four-family properties that do not meet the thresholds for “substantial improvement” under § 55.2(b)(10) ☐ 55.12(b)(3) HUD actions involving the disposition of individual HUD-acquired, one- to four-family properties. ☐ 55.12(b)(4) HUD guarantees under the Loan Guarantee Recovery Fund Program (24 CFR part 573) of loans that refinance existing loans and mortgages, where any new construction or rehabilitation financed by the existing loan or mortgage has been completed prior to the filing of an application under the program, and the refinancing will not allow further construction or rehabilitation, nor result in any physical impacts or changes except for routine maintenance. ☐ 55.12(b)(5) The approval of financial assistance to lease an existing structure located within the floodplain, but only if— (i) The structure is located outside the floodway or Coastal High Hazard Area, and is in a community that is in the Regular Program of the NFIP and in good standing (i.e., not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24); (ii) The project is not a critical action; and (iii) The entire structure is or will be fully insured or insured to the maximum under the NFIP for at least the term of the lease.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

7. Mitigation For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

Which of the following mitigation/minimization measures have been identified for this project in the 8-Step or 5-Step Process? Select all that apply. ☐ Permeable surfaces ☐ Natural landscape enhancements that maintain or restore natural hydrology ☐ Planting or restoring native plant species ☐ Bioswales ☐ Evapotranspiration ☐ Stormwater capture and reuse ☐ Green or vegetative roofs with drainage provisions ☐ Natural Resources Conservation Service conservation easements or similar easements ☐ Floodproofing of structures ☐ Elevating structures including freeboarding above the required base flood elevations ☐ Other

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Elaine Huch, Chairwoman Kaw Nation of Oklahoma P.O. Box 50 Kaw City, Oklahoma 74641

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Chairwoman Huch,

The City of Manhattan funds our Housing Rehabilitation program with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) CDBG Program. Under HUD regulation 24 CFR 58.4, the City has assumed HUD’s environmental review responsibilities for the Rehabilitation Program, including Tribal Consultation related to historic properties. Historic properties typically include archeological sites, burial grounds, sacred landscapes or features, ceremonial areas, traditional cultural places and landscapes, plant and animal communities, and buildings and structures, having significant tribal association.

The City is conducting an environmental review for the Housing Rehabilitation Program for Grant Year 2020, to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations 36 CFR Part 800. More information on the Section 106 review process is available at: http://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/historic-preservation/.

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

The City invites you to assist us by being a consulting party in this review process for our CDBG Year 2020 Housing Rehabilitation program, to help identify any historic single-family homes within Manhattan’s city limits that may have religious and cultural significance to your Nation.

The Rehabilitation Program involves only “Single-Family owner-occupied homes” located within Manhattan’s city limits. The program provides renovations that improve accessibility, livability, and safety for low and moderate income, single-family homes; and typically addresses hazard mitigation for radon, lead, and asbestos, as well as activities to preserve the structure’s usable life such as roof replacement, HVAC replacement, foundation stabilization and other renovations. Specific project addresses are identified as homeowners make an application for rehabilitation assistance, and it is unknown if there are any addresses that may potentially have a significant tribal association.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

In 2009, the City contracted with the Kansas State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work to conduct the Manhattan Archaeological Survey - Phases I and II. Links to the results of the survey are found online at https://cityofmhk.com/2872/Historic-Surveys under the section Titled “2008 Archaeological Survey”. The Survey revealed a variety of archaeological resources in the Manhattan Urban Area that included Archaic, Woodland, Central Plains’ tradition, Historic Native American, and Historic Euro-American components. However, none of the sites identified in the study included existing single-family homes, which may be historically important to your Nation, and the City currently has no historical record of any homes that may have tribal significance.

Please provide a list of any single-family home addresses within Manhattan’s city limits that are important to your Nation. If a rehabilitation application is made for any address you identify as being significant, City Administration will contact you to help assess how the project activities might affect the site and discuss possible ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate potential adverse effects, if any.

To meet Project timeframes, if you choose to be a consulting party on this project, please let us know of your interest within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and include in your reply the name and contact information for the Nation’s principal representative in the consultation. The City will contact you if rehabilitation activities are applied for at any address that you identify.

If no single-family homes having tribal religious or cultural significance exist within the City limits of Manhattan, or if you do not wish to consult on this project, please also let us know in writing within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If the City does not received a response from you within 30 days, it will then presume that your Nation has no concerns with the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program moving forward.

We value your assistance and look forward to consulting for any historic properties of religious and/or cultural significance to your Nation that may be affected by this project. Thank you very much for any information you may provide.

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

EC/CLE/sl 20030

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Dr. Andrea A. Hunter, THPO Osage Nation of Oklahoma 627 Grandview Pawhuska, Oklahoma 74056

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Dr. Hunter,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

cc: Geoffrey Standing Bear, Principal Chief

EC/CLE/sl 20031

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Gary McAdams, THPO Wichita & Affiliated Tribes of Oklahoma P.O. Box 729 Anadarko, Oklahoma 73005

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Mr. McAdams,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

In 2009, the City contracted with the Kansas State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work to conduct the Manhattan Archaeological Survey - Phases I and II. Links to the results of the survey are found online at https://cityofmhk.com/2872/Historic-Surveys under the section Titled “2008 Archaeological Survey”. The Survey revealed a variety of archaeological resources in the Manhattan Urban Area that included Archaic, Woodland, Central Plains’ tradition, Historic Native American, and Historic Euro-American components. However, none of the sites identified in the study included existing single-family homes, which may be historically important to your Tribes, and the City currently has no historical record of any homes that may have tribal significance.

Please provide a list of any single-family home addresses within Manhattan’s city limits that are important to your Tribes. If a rehabilitation application is made for any address you identify as being significant, City Administration will contact you to help assess how the project activities might affect the site and discuss possible ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate potential adverse effects, if any.

To meet Project timeframes, if you choose to be a consulting party on this project, please let us know of your interest within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and include in your reply the name and contact information for the Tribes’ principal representative in the consultation. The City will contact you if rehabilitation activities are applied for at any address that you identify.

If no single-family homes having tribal religious or cultural significance exist within the City limits of Manhattan, or if you do not wish to consult on this project, please also let us know in writing within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If the City does not received a response from you within 30 days, it will then presume that your Tribes has no concerns with the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program moving forward.

We value your assistance and look forward to consulting for any historic properties of religious and/or cultural significance to your Tribes that may be affected by this project. Thank you very much for any information you may provide.

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

cc: Terri Parton, President

EC/CLE/sl 20032

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Terri Parton, President Wichita & Affiliated Tribes of Oklahoma P.O. Box 729 Anadarko, Oklahoma 73005

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear President Parton,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

In 2009, the City contracted with the Kansas State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work to conduct the Manhattan Archaeological Survey - Phases I and II. Links to the results of the survey are found online at https://cityofmhk.com/2872/Historic-Surveys under the section Titled “2008 Archaeological Survey”. The Survey revealed a variety of archaeological resources in the Manhattan Urban Area that included Archaic, Woodland, Central Plains’ tradition, Historic Native American, and Historic Euro-American components. However, none of the sites identified in the study included existing single-family homes, which may be historically important to your Tribes, and the City currently has no historical record of any homes that may have tribal significance.

To meet Project timeframes, if you choose to be a consulting party on this project, please let us know of your interest within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and include in your reply the name and contact information for the Tribes’ principal representative in the consultation. The City will contact you if rehabilitation activities are applied for at any address that you identify.

If no single-family homes having tribal religious or cultural significance exist within the City limits of Manhattan, or if you do not wish to consult on this project, please also let us know in writing within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If the City does not received a response from you within 30 days, it will then presume that your Tribes has no concerns with the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program moving forward.

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

cc: Gary McAdams, THPO

EC/CLE/sl 20033

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Reggie Wassana, Governor Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma 100 Red Moon Circle Concho, Oklahoma 73022

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Governor Wassana,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

In 2009, the City contracted with the Kansas State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work to conduct the Manhattan Archaeological Survey - Phases I and II. Links to the results of the survey are found online at https://cityofmhk.com/2872/Historic-Surveys under the section Titled “2008 Archaeological Survey”. The Survey revealed a variety of archaeological resources in the Manhattan Urban Area that included Archaic, Woodland, Central Plains’ tradition, Historic Native American, and Historic Euro-American components. However, none of the sites identified in the study included existing single-family homes, which may be historically important to your Tribes, and the City currently has no historical record of any homes that may have tribal significance.

To meet Project timeframes, if you choose to be a consulting party on this project, please let us know of your interest within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and include in your reply the name and contact information for the Tribes’ principal representative in the consultation. The City will contact you if rehabilitation activities are applied for at any address that you identify.

If no single-family homes having tribal religious or cultural significance exist within the City limits of Manhattan, or if you do not wish to consult on this project, please also let us know in writing within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If the City does not received a response from you within 30 days, it will then presume that your Tribes has no concerns with the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program moving forward.

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

cc: Max Bear, THPO

EC/CLE/sl 20034

May29, 2020 Community Development

Max Bear, THPO Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma 700 Black Kettle Blvd. Concho, Oklahoma 73022

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Mr. Bear,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

In 2009, the City contracted with the Kansas State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work to conduct the Manhattan Archaeological Survey - Phases I and II. Links to the results of the survey are found online at https://cityofmhk.com/2872/Historic-Surveys under the section Titled “2008 Archaeological Survey”. The Survey revealed a variety of archaeological resources in the Manhattan Urban Area that included Archaic, Woodland, Central Plains’ tradition, Historic Native American, and Historic Euro-American components. However, none of the sites identified in the study included existing single-family homes, which may be historically important to your Tribes, and the City currently has no historical record of any homes that may have tribal significance.

To meet Project timeframes, if you choose to be a consulting party on this project, please let us know of your interest within 30 days of receipt of this letter, and include in your reply the name and contact information for the Tribes’ principal representative in the consultation. The City will contact you if rehabilitation activities are applied for at any address that you identify.

If no single-family homes having tribal religious or cultural significance exist within the City limits of Manhattan, or if you do not wish to consult on this project, please also let us know in writing within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If the City does not received a response from you within 30 days, it will then presume that your Tribes has no concerns with the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program moving forward.

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development

cc: Reggie Wassana, Governor

EC/CLE/sl 20035

May 29, 2020 Community Development

Geoffrey Standing Bear, Principal Chief Osage Nation of Oklahoma 627 Grandview Pawhuska, Oklahoma 74056

Re: City of Manhattan, KS - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Housing Rehabilitation Program

Dear Principal Chief Standing Bear,

HUD’s describes its process for Tribal Consultation under Section 106 in its Notice available at https://www.onecpd.info/resource/2448/notice-cpd-12-006-tribal-consultation-under-24-cfr-part-58.

City Hall * 1101 Poyntz Avenue * Manhattan Kansas * 66502-5497 * Phone 785-587-2412* fax 785-587-2439 * [email protected] www.cityofmhk.com

Sincerely,

Eric Cattell, AICP Director, Community Development cc: Dr. Andrea A. Hunter, THPO

EC/CLE/sl 20036

Historic Preservation (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Regulations under Section 106 of Section 106 of the 36 CFR 800 “Protection of the National Historic National Historic Historic Properties” Preservation Act (NHPA) require Preservation Act a consultative process to identify (16 U.S.C. 470f) historic properties, assess project impacts on them, and avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/historic-preservation

Threshold Is Section 106 review required for your project? ☐ No, because the project consists solely of activities listed as exempt in a Programmatic Agreement (PA). (See the PA Database to find applicable PAs.) Either provide the PA itself or a link to it here. Mark the applicable exemptions or include the text here:

Each Project site will be evaluated for Historic Preservation impacts in the Tier II level review. The Kansas SHPO will be consulted for any property not meeting the criteria of the 2017 Programmatic Agreement.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐ No, because the project consists solely of activities included in a No Potential to Cause Effects memo or other determination [36 CFR 800.3(a)(1)]. Either provide the memo itself or a link to it here. Explain and justify the other determination here:

Each Project site will be evaluated for Historic Preservation impacts in the Tier II level review. If the Kansas SHPO is consulted for any property not meeting the criteria of the 2017 Programmatic Agreement, the copy of the SHPO Report Record will be included in the ERR Tier 2 documentation. The city consulted with Tribes that have a potential interest within city limits, during the Tier 1 review process. Tribes were identified using TDAT. No known sites have been identified by the tribes consulted.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐Yes, because the project includes activities with potential to cause effects (direct or indirect).  Continue to Step 1.

The Section 106 Process After determining the need to do a Section 106 review, initiate consultation with regulatory and other interested parties, identify and evaluate historic properties, assess effects of the project on properties listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and resolve any adverse effects through project design modifications or mitigation. Note that consultation continues through all phases of the review. Step 1: Initiate consultation Step 2: Identify and evaluate historic properties Step 3: Assess effects of the project on historic properties Step 4: Resolve any adverse effects

Step 1 - Initiate Consultation The following parties are entitled to participate in Section 106 reviews: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs); federally recognized Indian tribes/Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs); Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs); local governments; and project grantees. The general public and individuals and organizations with a demonstrated interest in a project may participate as consulting parties at the discretion of the RE or HUD official. Participation varies with the nature and scope of a project. Refer to HUD’s website for guidance on consultation, including the required timeframes for response. Consultation should begin early to enable full consideration of preservation options.

Use the When To Consult With Tribes checklist within Notice CPD-12-006: Process for Tribal Consultation to determine if you should invite tribes to consult on a particular project. Use the Tribal Directory Assessment Tool (TDAT) to identify tribes that may have an interest in the area where the project is located. Note that consultants may not initiate consultation with Tribes.

Select all consulting parties below (check all that apply): ☐State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) ☐Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ☐Indian Tribes, including Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) or Native ☐Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) List all tribes that were consulted here and their status of consultation:

☐Other Consulting Parties List all consulting parties that were consulted here and their status of consultation:

Describe the process of selecting consulting parties and initiating consultation here:

Provide all correspondence, notices, and notes (including comments and objections received) and continue to Step 2.

Step 2 - Identify and Evaluate Historic Properties Define the Area of Potential Effect (APE), either by entering the address(es) or providing a map depicting the APE. Attach an additional page if necessary.

Gather information about known historic properties in the APE. Historic buildings, districts and archeological sites may have been identified in local, state, and national surveys and registers, local historic districts, municipal plans, town and county histories, and local history websites. If not already listed on the National Register of Historic Places, identified properties are then evaluated to see if they are eligible for the National Register. Refer to HUD’s website for guidance on identifying and evaluating historic properties.

In the space below, list historic properties identified and evaluated in the APE. Every historic property that may be affected by the project should be listed. For each historic property or district, include the National Register status, whether the SHPO has concurred with the finding, and whether information on the site is sensitive. Attach an additional page if necessary.

Provide the documentation (survey forms, Register nominations, concurrence(s) and/or objection(s), notes, and photos) that justify your National Register Status determination.

Was a survey of historic buildings and/or archeological sites done as part of the project? If the APE contains previously unsurveyed buildings or structures over 50 years old, or there is a likely presence of previously unsurveyed archeological sites, a survey may be necessary. For Archeological surveys, refer to HP Fact Sheet #6, Guidance on Archeological Investigations in HUD Projects.

☐ Yes  Provide survey(s) and report(s) and continue to Step 3. Additional notes:

☐ No  Continue to Step 3.

Step 3 - Assess Effects of the Project on Historic Properties Only properties that are listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places receive further consideration under Section 106. Assess the effect(s) of the project by applying the Criteria of Adverse Effect. (36 CFR 800.5)] Consider direct and indirect effects as applicable as per HUD guidance.

Choose one of the findings below - No Historic Properties Affected, No Adverse Effect, or Adverse Effect; and seek concurrence from consulting parties. ☐ No Historic Properties Affected Document reason for finding: ☐ No historic properties present.  Provide concurrence(s) or objection(s) and continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐ Historic properties present, but project will have no effect upon them.  Provide concurrence(s) or objection(s) and continue to the Worksheet Summary.

If consulting parties concur or fail to respond to user’s request for concurrence, project is in compliance with this section. No further review is required. If consulting parties object, refer to (36 CFR 800.4(d)(1)) and consult further to try to resolve objection(s).

☐ No Adverse Effect Document reason for finding:

Does the No Adverse Effect finding contain conditions? ☐ Yes Check all that apply: (check all that apply) ☐ Avoidance ☐ Modification of project ☐ Other

Describe conditions here:

 Monitor satisfactory implementation of conditions. Provide concurrence(s) or objection(s) and continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐ No  Provide concurrence(s) or objection(s) and continue to the Worksheet Summary.

If consulting parties concur or fail to respond to user’s request for concurrence, project is in compliance with this section. No further review is required. If consulting parties object, refer to (36 CFR 800.5(c)(2)) and consult further to try to resolve objection(s).

☐ Adverse Effect Document reason for finding: Copy and paste applicable Criteria into text box with summary and justification. Criteria of Adverse Effect: 36 CFR 800.5]

Notify the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation of the Adverse Effect and provide the documentation outlined in 36 CFR 800.11(e). The Council has 15 days to decide whether to enter the consultation (Not required for projects covered by a Programmatic Agreement).

 Continue to Step 4.

Step 4 - Resolve Adverse Effects Work with consulting parties to try to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects. Refer to HUD guidance and 36 CFR 800.6 and 800.7.

Were the Adverse Effects resolved? ☐ Yes Describe the resolution of Adverse Effects, including consultation efforts and participation by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation:

For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Provide signed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or Standard Mitigation Measures Agreement (SMMA). Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

☐ No The project must be cancelled unless the “Head of Agency” approves it. Either provide approval from the “Head of Agency” or cancel the project at this location. Describe the failure to resolve Adverse Effects, including consultation efforts and participation by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and “Head of the Agency”:

Explain in detail the exact conditions or measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Provide correspondence, comments, documentation of decision, and “Head of Agency” approval. Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Each Project site will be evaluated for Historic Preservation impacts in the Tier II level review. The Kansas SHPO will be consulted for any property not meeting the criteria of the 2017 Programmatic Agreement, and will abide by recommendations for preservation of Historic Properties. The City will not take any action deemed to have an adverse effect. If significant ground disturbance is to occur then the tribes will be consulted. This is the only instance identified on the check list that may have a potential impact on sites with significant historical or cultural tribal relevance.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Sole Source Aquifer Map

3/24/2020, 12:22:14 PM 1:9,244,649 0 60 120 240mi

Sole_Source_Aquifers 0 95 190 380km Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Sole Source Aquifers (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 Safe Drinking Water 40 CFR Part 149 protects drinking water systems Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. which are the sole or principal 201, 300f et seq., and drinking water source for an area and 21 U.S.C. 349) which, if contaminated, would create a significant hazard to public health. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/sole-source-aquifers

1. Does your project consist solely of acquisition, leasing, or rehabilitation of an existing building(s)? ☒Yes  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐No  Continue to Question 2.

2. Is the project located on a sole source aquifer (SSA)1? ☐No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination, such as a map of your project (or jurisdiction, if appropriate) in relation to the nearest SSA and its source area.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 3.

3. Does your region have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) or other working agreement with EPA for HUD projects impacting a sole source aquifer? Contact your Field or Regional Environmental Officer or visit the HUD webpage at the link above to determine if an MOU or agreement exists in your area. ☐Yes  Provide the MOU or agreement as part of your supporting documentation. Continue to Question 4.

☐No  Continue to Question 5.

4. Does your MOU or working agreement exclude your project from further review? ☒Yes  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination and document where your project fits within the MOU or agreement. ☐No  Continue to Question 5.

1 A sole source aquifer is defined as an aquifer that supplies at least 50 percent of the drinking water consumed in the area overlying the aquifer. This includes streamflow source areas, which are upstream areas of losing streams that flow into the recharge area. 5. Will the proposed project contaminate the aquifer and create a significant hazard to public health? Consult with your Regional EPA Office. Your consultation request should include detailed information about your proposed project and its relationship to the aquifer and associated streamflow source area. EPA will also want to know about water, storm water and waste water at the proposed project. Follow your MOU or working agreement or contact your Regional EPA office for specific information you may need to provide. EPA may request additional information if impacts to the aquifer are questionable after this information is submitted for review.

☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide your correspondence with the EPA and all documents used to make your determination. ☐Yes  Work with EPA to develop mitigation measures. If mitigation measures are approved, attach correspondence with EPA and include the mitigation measures in your environmental review documents and project contracts. If EPA determines that the project continues to pose a significant risk to the aquifer, federal financial assistance must be denied. Continue to Question 6.

6. In order to continue with the project, any threat must be mitigated, and all mitigation must be approved by the EPA. Explain in detail the proposed measures that can be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency’s concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

Manhattan Wet Lands Map

1:47,811 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 mi U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team, [email protected] 0 0.5 1 2 km

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife May 27, 2020 Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other

Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Pond Riverine National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This page was produced by the NWI mapper Manhattan City Limits City of Manhattan Boundary Roads Rivers and Water Features

Aerial: 2018 Pictometry 0 3,000 6,000 12,000 Data: Riley County GIS (exported 5/14/2019), Pottawatomie County Data Sources: City of Manhattan, Riley County GIS ¯ Feet

X:\GIS_BASE_MAP\MapDatabase\manhattan_ctybnd\City_Limits_small_5_29_2019.mxd Map produced by: Julie.Peterson, 5/29/2019 Map lasted saved on: 5/29/2019 by Julie.Peterson Parcel extents are approximate Wetlands (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Executive Order 11990 discourages that direct or Executive Order 24 CFR 55.20 can indirect support of new construction impacting 11990 be used for wetlands wherever there is a practicable general guidance alternative. The Fish and Wildlife Service’s regarding the 8 National Wetlands Inventory can be used as a Step Process. primary screening tool, but observed or known wetlands not indicated on NWI maps must also be processed. Off-site impacts that result in draining, impounding, or destroying wetlands must also be processed. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/wetlands-protection

1. Does this project involve new construction as defined in Executive Order 11990, expansion of a building’s footprint, or ground disturbance? The term "new construction" shall include draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, and related activities and any structures or facilities begun or authorized after the effective date of the Order. ☒ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. ☐ Yes  Continue to Question 2.

2. Will the new construction or other ground disturbance impact an on- or off-site wetland? The term "wetlands" means those areas that are inundated by surface or ground water with a frequency sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances does or would support, a prevalence of vegetative or aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas such as sloughs, potholes, wet meadows, river overflows, mud flats, and natural ponds. Wetlands under E.O. 11990 include isolated and non-jurisdictional wetlands.

☐ No, a wetland will not be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990’s definition of new construction.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map or any other relevant documentation to explain your determination.

☐ Yes, there is a wetland that be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990’s definition of new construction. You must determine that there are no practicable alternatives to wetlands development by completing the 8-Step Process. Provide a completed 8-Step Process as well as all documents used to make your determination, including a map. Be sure to include the early public notice and the final notice with your documentation. Continue to Question 3.

3. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

Which of the following mitigation actions have been or will be taken? Select all that apply: ☐ Permeable surfaces ☐ Natural landscape enhancements that maintain or restore natural hydrology through infiltration ☐ Native plant species ☐ Bioswales ☐ Evapotranspiration ☐ Stormwater capture and reuse ☐ Green or vegetative roofs with drainage provisions ☐ Natural Resources Conservation Service conservation easements ☐ Compensatory mitigation

Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Map, the only identified wetlands near the project area are freshwater ponds within City limits and in the watershed above the City which will not be affected by interior renovation of single family homes. No Project site will include draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, or impounding of water bodies or streams, and no adverse impacts are expected. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No Wild and Scenic Rivers (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act The Wild and Scenic Rivers 36 CFR Part 297 provides federal protection for Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287), certain free-flowing, wild, scenic particularly section 7(b) and and recreational rivers (c) (16 U.S.C. 1278(b) and (c)) designated as components or potential components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) from the effects of construction or development. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/wild-and-scenic-rivers

1. Is your project within proximity of a NWSRS river as defined below? Wild & Scenic Rivers: These rivers or river segments have been designated by Congress or by states (with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior) as wild, scenic, or recreational Study Rivers: These rivers or river segments are being studied as a potential component of the Wild & Scenic River system. Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI): The National Park Service has compiled and maintains the NRI, a register of river segments that potentially qualify as national wild, scenic, or recreational river areas

☒ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination, such as a map identifying the project site and its surrounding area or a list of rivers in your region in the Screen Summary at the conclusion of this screen.

☐ Yes, the project is in proximity of a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) River.  Continue to Question 2.

2. Could the project do any of the following? . Have a direct and adverse effect within Wild and Scenic River Boundaries, . Invade the area or unreasonably diminish the river outside Wild and Scenic River Boundaries, or . Have an adverse effect on the natural, cultural, and/or recreational values of a NRI segment.

Consultation with the appropriate federal/state/local/tribal Managing Agency(s) is required, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, to determine if the proposed project may have an adverse effect on a Wild & Scenic River or a Study River and, if so, to determine the appropriate avoidance or mitigation measures. Note: Concurrence may be assumed if the Managing Agency does not respond within 30 days; however, you are still obligated to avoid or mitigate adverse effects on the rivers identified in the NWSRS

☐ No, the Managing Agency has concurred that the proposed project will not alter, directly, or indirectly, any of the characteristics that qualifies or potentially qualifies the river for inclusion in the NWSRS.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency’s concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination. ☐ Yes, the Managing Agency was consulted and the proposed project may alter, directly, or indirectly, any of the characteristics that qualifies or potentially qualifies the river for inclusion in the NWSRS.  Continue to Question 3.

3. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the Managing Agency’s concurrence) and any other documentation used to make your determination.

Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region The National Wild and Scenic River System states that Kansas has approximately 133,956 miles of river, but no designated wild & scenic rivers. The National Parks System report, last updated November 2016, shows that there are currently no “study river” sections in Riley County. Therefore the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation project sites comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

5/22/2019 Kansas - Rivers (U.S. National Park Service)

National Park Service(/)

Kansas

River County Reach Length Description Potential ORVs Watershed Year Other (miles) Classification (HUC Listed/ State Code 8) Updated

Caney Chautauqua, Headwaters to KS/OK line 62 Very scenic southern Flint Hills stream through Fish, Verdigris 1982 River Elk relatively undisturbed woodland tall grass prairie Geologic, ecosystem; excellent seasonal canoeing; excellent Historic, sport fishery; significant limestone outcrops and Recreational, unusual formations; old trail crossings. Scenic Cedar Chase Segment 2: Middle Creek 16 Relatively clear gravel bottom stream; excellent Geologic, Neosho 1982 Creek to confluence with quality Flint Hills stream. Recreational, Cottonwood River Scenic Chikaskia Sumner, Highway 2 northeast of 53 Best of south central Kansas streams, one of best Fish, Arkansas- 1982 OK River Harper Runnymede to KS/OK high plains streams; good seasonal canoeing; high Historic, Keystone line water quality, good fishery; excellent wildlife diversity Recreational, and populations; old mill site. Scenic, Wildlife Cimarron Comanche, Segment 2: Highway 23 99 Wide stream with minimal flow, scattered trees, Historic Upper 1982 OK River Clark, Meade east of Liberal, KS to surrounded by isolated, undeveloped land; Cimarron Cimarron confluence with Buffalo Redoubt, excavated remains of small sandbag 'fort' Creek in OK (continues built by army in 1870 to protect military route between upstream in Section 13d Kansas and Indian territory. to KS/CO line) Cimarron Meade, Segment 1: CO/KS Line 149 Wagon Bed Springs National Historic Landmark, an Cultural, Upper 1982 River Seward, to highway 23 east of oasis on 60-mile Cimarron Cutoff route of Santa Fe Historic Cimarron Haskell, Liberal, KS (continues Trail (ruts still visible in vicinity); numerous prehistoric Grant, downstream in Section sites from Paleo to more recent Indian usage. Stevens, 13e to KS/OK State line) Morton https://www.nps.gov/subjects/rivers/kansas.htm 1/4 5/22/2019 Kansas - Rivers (U.S. National Park Service)

Cottonwood Chase Little Cedar Creek to 26 Flint Hills stream, surrounded by rolling hills and Fish, Neosho 1982 River, confluence with native tall grasses; excellent native fishery; excellent Geologic, South Fork Cottonwood River riparian habitat. Recreational, Scenic, Wildlife Fall River Wilson, Elk, Fall River Lake to 59 Scenic larger river flowing out of rolling tall grass Fish, Verdigris 1982 Greenwood confluence with Verdigris prairie, upper reaches in high quality Flint Hills Geologic, River ecosystem; excellent fish and wildlife resources; Recreational, excellent canoeing. Scenic, Wildlife Grouse Cowley Cowley/Butler County 64 High quality western Flint Hills stream; good Fish, Arkansas- 1982 Creek Line to confluence with canoeing; excellent fish and wildlife resources. Geologic, Keystone Arkansas River Recreational, Scenic, Wildlife Kansas Wyandotte, Delaware River to I-635 57 Relatively large plains river having good scenic Cultural, Kansas 1982 River Johnson, values; one of only three public streams in the state; Fish, Leavenworth, access for recreation opportunities, including Recreational, Douglas, canoeing, is uncommonly good. Scenic, Jefferson Wildlife Lyon Creek Geary, RR Bridge south of 35 Scenic northern Flint Hills stream with good water Fish, Smoky Hill 1982 Dickinson Woodbine to confluence quality, dense tree corridor; good canoeing; good Recreational, with Smoky Hill River native fish population; large blue heron rookery. Scenic, Wildlife Medicine Barber, Segment 1: Belvidere to 60 Good stream flow through rolling topography with Recreational, Arkansas- 1982 (Lodge) Kiowa Gerlane (continues moderate-to-heavy streamside vegetation; excellent Scenic, Keystone River downstream in Section wildlife values. Wildlife 12f to KS/OK Line) Medicine Barber Segment 2: Gerlane to 22 Good stream flow through rolling topography with Historic, Arkansas- 1982 (Lodge) KS/OK Line (continues moderate to heavy streamside vegetation; excellent Recreational, Keystone River upstream in Section 13e wildlife values; Carrie A. Nation House National Scenic, to Belvidere) Historic Landmark, Medicine Lodge Peace Treaty Wildlife Site National Historic Landmark. Middle Chase Segment 1: Chase/ Butler 9 Relatively clear gravel bottom stream; excellent Geologic, Neosho 1982 Creek County line to confluence quality Flint Hills stream. Recreational, with Cedar Creek Scenic https://www.nps.gov/subjects/rivers/kansas.htm 2/4 5/22/2019 Kansas - Rivers (U.S. National Park Service)

Mill Creek Wabaunsee Segment 4: confluence 36 Highly scenic Flint Hills stream, some stretches Fish, Kansas 1982 with South and West surrounded by virgin tall grass prairie; excellent Geologic, Branches to confluence seasonal canoeing, some white water and riffles; Recreational, with Kansas River excellent native fishery, wildlife. Scenic, Wildlife Mill Creek, Wabaunsee Segment 2: Headwaters 15 Highly scenic Flint Hills stream, some stretches Fish, Kansas 1982 East to confluence with South surrounded by virgin tall grass prairie; excellent Geologic, Branch Branch seasonal canoeing, some white water and riffles; Recreational, excellent native fishery, wildlife. Scenic, Wildlife Mill Creek, Wabaunsee Segment 3: From 7 Highly scenic Flint Hills stream, some stretches Fish, Kansas 1982 South confluence with East surrounded by virgin tall grass prairie; excellent Geologic, Branch Branch to confluence with seasonal canoeing, some white water and riffles; Recreational, Mill Creek excellent native fishery, wildlife. Scenic, Wildlife Mill Creek, Wabaunsee Segment 1: Headwaters 29 Highly scenic Flint Hills stream, some stretches Fish, Kansas 1982 West to confluence with East surrounded by virgin tall grass prairie; excellent Geologic, Branch Branch and Mill Creek seasonal canoeing, some white water and riffles; Recreational, excellent native fishery, wildlife. Scenic, Wildlife Otter Creek Greenwood Segment 2: Confluence 14 Good flow through rolling terrain with relief features to Fish, Verdigris 1982 with North Branch Otter 300'; heavy tree corridor; good fishery. Recreational, Creek to Fall River Scenic Reservoir Otter Greenwood Segment 1: Highway 96 15 Good flow through rolling terrain with relief features to Fish, Verdigris 1982 Creek, (US Highway 400) 300'; heavy tree corridor; good fishery. Recreational, North northwest of Blodgett to Scenic Branch confluence with Otter Creek Saline Russell Wilson Lake to Fairport 48 Good flow through scenic portion of Smoky Hills; Fish, Smoky Hill 1982 River (just East of Elis/Russell good fishery and riparian wildlife. Geologic, county line) Recreational, Scenic, Wildlife

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/rivers/kansas.htm 3/4 5/22/2019 Kansas - Rivers (U.S. National Park Service)

Spring Jasper, Highway 96 to Highway 59 One of the two Ozarkian watersheds that extend into Fish, Spring 1982 MO River Lawrence, 44 Kansas; narrow tree-covered corridor through gently Recreational, and Ottawa rolling terrain; excellent canoeing; unique fish Scenic, communities confined to drainage including two on Wildlife Missouri rare/endangered list--Neosho madtom, redfin shiner; rare/endangered mussels (Missouri).

Last updated: November 30, 2016

EXPERIENCE MORE

SUBJECTS PARKS

Urban Parks and Programs (/subjects/urban/index.htm) Alagnak Wild River (/alag/index.htm) Buffalo National River (/buff/)

Wetlands (/subjects/wetlands/index.htm) Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area (/chat/) (/biso/index.htm) Watersheds (/subjects/watersheds/index.htm) Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (/dewa/) Bluestone National Scenic River (/blue/index.htm) View All Related Subjects (/experiencemore/related- View All Related Parks (/experiencemore/related- content.htm?subjectID=0706D95C-3010-42EE-A65D- content.htm?subjectID=0706D95C-3010-42EE-A65D- 163943F641EB#subject) 163943F641EB#park)

National(//www.nps.gov) Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/rivers/kansas.htm 4/4 Manhattan City Limits Outlined in Red

May 28, 2020 1:95,000 0 0.75 1.5 3 mi

0 1.25 2.5 5 km Aerial 18, RL Basemap, RL County Kansas

NATIONAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS CONTACT US 50 YEARS SITE INDEX

KANSAS

Kansas has approximately 133,956 miles of river, but no designated wild & scenic rivers.

Choose A State

Choose A River

Nourished by the fertile soils of the region, rivers of the Midwest explode with life, from great avian migrations to ancient fishes.

Legend

+ View larger map

Kansas does not have any designated rivers.

https://www.rivers.gov/kansas.php[5/28/2020 8:47:06 AM] Kansas

NATIONWIDE RIVERS INVENTORY CONTACT US PRIVACY NOTICE Q & A SEARCH ENGINE SITE MAP

Designated Rivers National System River Management Resources

About WSR Act WSR Table Council Q & A Search State Listings Study Rivers Agencies Bibliography Profile Pages Stewardship Management Plans Publications WSR Legislation River Mgt. Society GIS Mapping GIS Mapping Logo & Sign Standards

https://www.rivers.gov/kansas.php[5/28/2020 8:47:06 AM] Manhattan City Limits City of Manhattan Boundary Roads Rivers and Water Features

0 3,000 6,000 12,000 Aerial: 2018 Pictometry Feet Data: Riley County GIS (exported 5/14/2019), Pottawatomie County Data Sources: City of Manhattan, Riley County GIS ¯ Map lasted saved on: 5/29/2019 by Julie.Peterson X:\GIS_BASE_MAP\MapDatabase\manhattan_ctybnd\City_Limits_small_5_29_2019.mxd Map produced by: Julie.Peterson, 5/29/2019 Parcel extents are approximate Airport Hazards (CEST and EA) General policy Legislation Regulation It is HUD’s policy to apply standards to 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D prevent incompatible development around civil airports and military airfields. References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/airport-hazards

1. To ensure compatible land use development, you must determine your site’s proximity to civil and military airports. Is your project within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport? ☒No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within the applicable distances to a military or civilian airport.

☐Yes  Continue to Question 2.

2. Is your project located within a Runway Potential Zone/Clear Zone (RPZ/CZ) or Accident Potential Zone (APZ)? ☐Yes, project is in an APZ  Continue to Question 3.

☐Yes, project is an RPZ/CZ  Project cannot proceed at this location.

☐No, project is not within an APZ or RPZ/CZ  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within either zone.

3. Is the project in conformance with DOD guidelines for APZ? ☐Yes, project is consistent with DOD guidelines without further action. Explain how you determined that the project is consistent:

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting this determination.

☐No, the project cannot be brought into conformance with DOD guidelines and has not been approved.  Project cannot proceed at this location.

☐Project is not consistent with DOD guidelines, but it has been approved by Certifying Officer or HUD Approving Official. Explain approval process:

If mitigation measures have been or will be taken, explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documentation supporting this determination.

According to nfdc.faa.gov the Manhattan Regional Airport is located 4 miles South West of the City Limits of Manhattan, Kansas. Due to this noted distance, it is presumed that all CDBG Housing

Rehabilitation Projects will be farther away than the required minimum 15,000 feet (2.84 miles) of a military airport or 2,500 feet (0.47 miles) of a civilian airport. The documentation this assessment is included in the HEROS Environmental Report along with the environmental constraints map. It is therefore determined that the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation project sites will be in compliance with the Airport Hazard Policy.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

MANHATTAN RGNL

Aeronautical Information Services

Lookup

Data Effective: 05/21/2020 - 06/18/2020 MHK (KMHK) MANHATTAN RGNL MANHATTAN , KS - UNITED STATES

All Summary Operations Communications NAVAIDS Weather

RWY 03/21 RWY 13/31 Heliports Charts Contacts Remarks

Summary

Latitude/Longitude 39-8-28.4 N / 96-40-18.5 W

Elevation 1066 FT

Variation 4 E 2010

From city 4 miles SW of MANHATTAN, KS

ARTCC ZKC

Section chart KANSAS CITY

Time Zone UTC-6(-5DT)

View active NOTAMS

FAA.gov Home | Privacy Policy | Web Policies & Notices | Contact Us | Help

Readers & Viewers: PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | WinZip

https://nfdc.faa.gov/nfdcApps/services/ajv5/airportDisplay.jsp?airportId=MHK[5/27/2020 2:29:37 PM] Contamination and Toxic Substances (Single Family Properties)

General requirements Legislation Regulations It is HUD policy that all properties that are being 24 CFR 58.5(i)(2) proposed for use in HUD programs be free of 24 CFR 50.3(i) hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances, where a hazard could affect the health and safety of the occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/site-contamination

1. Evaluate the site for contamination. Were any on-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances found that could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? Provide a map or other documentation of absence or presence of contamination1 and explain evaluation of site contamination in the Worksheet below. ☐ No Explain:

Project sites for Housing Rehabilitation Project are identified as application is made. This section of the review is completed in the Tier 2 level.

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐ Yes

1 Utilize EPA’s Enviromapper and state/tribal databases to identify nearby dumps, junk yards, landfills, hazardous waste sites, and industrial sites, including EPA National Priorities List Sites (Superfund sites), CERCLA or state- equivalent sites, RCRA Corrective Action sites with release(s) or suspected release(s) requiring clean-up action and/or further investigation. Additional supporting documentation may include other inspections and reports.  Describe the findings, including any recognized environmental conditions (RECs), in Worksheet Summary below. Continue to Question 2.

Check here if an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report was utilized. [Note: HUD regulations does not require an ASTM Phase I ESA report for single family homes]

2. Mitigation Document the mitigation needed according to the requirements of the appropriate federal, state, tribal, or local oversight agency. If the adverse environmental mitigation cannot be mitigated, then HUD assistance may not be used for the project at this site.

Can adverse environmental impacts be mitigated? ☐ Adverse environmental impacts cannot feasibly be mitigated  Project cannot proceed at this location.

☐ Yes, adverse environmental impacts can be eliminated through mitigation.  Provide all mitigation requirements2 and documents. Continue to Question 3.

3. Describe how compliance was achieved. Include any of the following that apply: State Voluntary Clean-up Program, a No Further Action letter, use of engineering controls3, or use of institutional controls4.

2 Mitigation requirements include all clean-up actions required by applicable federal, state, tribal, or local law. Additionally, provide, as applicable, the long-term operations and maintenance plan, Remedial Action Work Plan, and other equivalent documents. 3 Engineering controls are any physical mechanism used to contain or stabilize contamination or ensure the effectiveness of a remedial action. Engineering controls may include, without limitation, caps, covers, dikes, trenches, leachate collection systems, signs, fences, physical access controls, ground water monitoring systems and ground water containment systems including, without limitation, slurry walls and ground water pumping systems. 4 Institutional controls are mechanisms used to limit human activities at or near a contaminated site, or to ensure the effectiveness of the remedial action over time, when contaminants remain at a site at levels above the applicable remediation standard which would allow for unrestricted use of the property. Institutional controls may include structure, land, and natural resource use restrictions, well restriction areas, classification exception areas, deed notices, and declarations of environmental restrictions. If a remediation plan or clean-up program was necessary, which standard does it follow? ☐ Complete removal ☐ Risk-based corrective action (RBCA) ☐ Other  Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

Project involves rehabilitation of LMI owned single family homes and may or may not include disturbing contaminated materials. Each housing Rehab project location will be evaluated on Tier 2

level review. No project site impacted by contamination or toxic substances will be eligible.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☐ No

KDHE Program Name Program ID Location Status

Stormwater Runoff Permitting FRONTIER FARM CREDIT NEW ADM BLDG 15730-STORMWATER 2009 VANESTA PL. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ANNEBERG PARK SOCCER & SOFTBALL FIELDS 19081-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground GASOLINE ALLEY II 28180-TANKS 336 S SETH CHILD RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DILLONS #294 FUEL CENTER 23651-TANKS 2925 CLAFLIN RD Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting GJL ADDITION 18722-STORMWATER 2800 AMHERST AVE. Inactive

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste WALGREENS # 12814 KSR105290813-KSG 2719 ANDERSON AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground RILEY CO 03981-TANKS 2711 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground CENTURY VAN LINES 25453-TANKS 2730 AMHERST AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KIMBALL AVE RECONSTRUCTION 22826-STORMWATER K-113 TO KENMAR DR Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting COLLEGE HILL EARLY LEARNING CENTER 23368-STORMWATER 2600 KIMBALL AVE Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting JARDINE APARTMENT REDEVELOPMENT PH I 3128-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

RCRA: Large Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KSD980632772-LQG 2016 AGRONOMY CENTRAL RD Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KANSAS WHEAT INNOVATION CENTER 15080-STORMWATER 0110S07E OTHER

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (HYDRAULIC OIL) KDHE-34890-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FASTLANE #12 23180-TANKS 1701 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU SEATON HALL EXPANSION 19824-STORMWATER SEATON HALL - KSU Inactive

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (KSU) 24195-TANKS 66506, postal area, United States Tank(s) Currently In Use

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-28593-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PARKING LOT A17 RECONSTRUCTION 15829-STORMWATER CLAFLIN AND MID CAMPUS DR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting A NEW BUILDING FOR COLLEGE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 18454-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator 1 HOUR CINDERELLA KSR000004051-NCG 1227 BLUEMONT AVE Active

Dry Cleaners IDEAL CLEANERS 0022-DRYCLEAN 1206 1/2 MORO ST Closed

Spill Incident Report STICKEL'S DRY CLEANERS KDHE-05191-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator 1101 MORO STREET KSR000511766-NCG 1101 MORO STREET Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU CCD URBAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 13748-STORMWATER EAST JARDINE DR. OTHER

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite SHORT STOP #12 30245-LUST 2010 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT 82709-TANKS N 3RD ST & OSAGE ST No Tank Information Given

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT 10250-STORMWATER 206 OSAGE OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN CROSSING PAD SITE 19192-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MCDONALDS REST EXPANSION 17361-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground GAS 4 LESS 19242-TANKS 917 N. 3RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OLD BIG BLUE BEAUTIFICATION PHASE V 21210-STORMWATER TUTTLE CREEK BLVD. & MCCALL RD. Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OLIVE GARDEN 13492-STORMWATER 615 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground GREEN HARDING 26364-TANKS 111 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DILLONS #15 FUEL CENTER 30203-TANKS 130 SARBER LN Tank(s) Currently In Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator MCKINZIE PEST CONTROL KSD985002070-NCG 1129 HAYES DR Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 40140-TANKS 1120 HAYES DR Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite MANHATTAN TRANSIT CHARTERS INC 25044-LUST 225 MCCALL RD Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PIZZA RANCH RESTAURANT 17502-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ALLEN RD SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORMSEWER IMPROVEMENTS 20875-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive RCRA: Not Currently a Generator USD 383 MANHATTAN MAINT SHOP KSD984969956-NCG 2031 CASEMENT RD Active

EPCRA: Right-to-Know UNITED RENTALS BRANCH F23 PT00318-RTK 915 ENOCH LN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting K STATE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 19886-STORMWATER 615 MCCALL RD. Inactive

Wastewater Treatment Federal/State Facility MANHATTAN CITY M-KS38-OO01-WWT-FED 1201 SOUTH LEVEE DRIVE Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting SHORT STOP CONVENIENCE MARKET 17216-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting AARON'S 17121-STORMWATER 8223 S. PORT DR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 2007 WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 10638-STORMWATER 0910S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting FISCHER SITE GRADING 22859-STORMWATER 00000 ANDERSON AVE Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OLD CHICAGO 18880-STORMWATER 2001 CLOCK TOWER PL Inactive

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-35324-SPILL 1110S07E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SHOP QUIK #11 05119-TANKS 3108 ANDERSON AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground ED SCHRAM DODGE INC 13991-TANKS 3100 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-28947-SPILL 1110S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WILDCAT CREEK EWP STREAMBANK PROTECTION 16519-STORMWATER 925 GARDEN WAY OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WESTPORT COMMONS 12829-STORMWATER BROWNING & CLAFLIN AVE. Inactive

Identified Sites RILEY COUNTY SHOP C508170194-ISL 2711 ANDERSON AVE Resolved

Identified Sites WESTPORT DRY CLEANERS C508173125-ISL 1120 WESTPORT DR Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator WESTPORT DRY CLNRS INC KSD984967844-NCG 1120 WESTPORT DR Active

Spill Incident Report ROBSON OIL KDHE-07590-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-30940-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting CICO PARK DETENTION AREA IMPROVEMENTS 18514-STORMWATER KIMBALL AVE & WREATH AVE. Inactive

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KSU COLES HALL 44516-TANKS 66506, postal area, United States Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KERR MCGEE #6402 09196-TANKS S HWY 18 ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MOORMAN MFG CO MANHATTAN DIV 26264-TANKS 1210S07E ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground LARSON CONST 82301-TANKS 1210S07E No Tank Information Given

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste CENTER FOR GRAIN & ANIMAL HLTH RES KSD021206099-KSG 1515 COLLEGE AVE Active

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-34759-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PHASE III NEW NORTH END & VANIER COMPLEX 18395-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OH KRUSE FEED TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION C 15862-STORMWATER 1908 KIMBALL AVE. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 1800 KIMBALL 18569-STORMWATER 1800 KIMBALL AVE. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PARKING LOT B18 RECONSTRUCTION 15831-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MIXED USE BUILDING (FORMER DAY 82793-TANKS 1101 MORO ST. No Tank Information Given

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator PREMIUM AUTO RESTORATION DERBY KSR000508234-NCG 920 N RIVER ST Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NBAF SANITARY SEWER MAIN 17446-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KSU D112 MOSIER HALL 44348-TANKS 1700 DENISON AVE. Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OLD BLUE RIVER TRAIL 22058-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NORTH MANHATTAN AVE PHASE 3A 22584-STORMWATER N MANHATTAN AVE & BAKERS WAY Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PARKER HANNIFIN 10477-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 2005 STORM WATER DETENTION POND 3301-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite GAS 4 LESS 19242-LUST 917 N. 3RD Closed

Wastewater Treatment Federal/State Facility PARKER HANNIFIN CORP P-KS38-OO01-WWT-FED 1501 HAYES DR Inactive Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground RYDER TRUCK RENTAL 06879-TANKS 121 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WASTE MANAGEMENT KANSAS MANHATTAN 11159-STORMWATER 0810S08E OTHER

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator ARTEX MFG CO KSD086056512-NCG 1416 HAYES DR Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KEITH NOLL MAINT CTR 05955-TANKS 2031 CASEMENT RD Tank(s) Currently In Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator KMART #7037 KSD073072407-NCG 401 E POYNTZ AVE Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PANDA EXPRESS MANHATTAN KANSAS 20524-STORMWATER 501 MCCALL RD. Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DARA'S FAST LANE #3 27829-LUST 473 EAST POYNTZ Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #3 27829-TANKS 473 EAST POYNTZ ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-32047-SPILL 0810S08E Closed

Wastewater Treatment Federal/State Facility MCCALL PATTERN CO INC I-KS38-CO01-WWT-FED 615 MCCALL RD Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting QUAKER MFG LLC (PEPSI CO BEV & FOODS) 10369-STORMWATER 1111 KRETSCHMER DR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HWY 177 / KONZA WATER EXTENSION 14960-STORMWATER 0810S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting DOLLAR GENERAL MANHATTAN KS 16752-STORMWATER 0910S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MHK SRTS PHIIB 23024-STORMWATER CLAFLIN RD Active

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-28138-SPILL 0210S07E Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator WESTSIDE AMOCO KSD981717168-NCG 3001 ANDERSON AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground OPPY BROS INC 22713-TANKS 3001 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Dry Cleaners WESTPORT DRY CLEANERS 0047-DRYCLEAN 1120 WESTPORT DR Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #5 29746-TANKS 1124 WESTPORT DR ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO 08863-TANKS 2620 AMHERST AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PEIL SUBSTATION 20933-STORMWATER 3132 DICKENS AVE Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting TOUA LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT 2347-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground USDA ARS 82311-TANKS 1515 COLLEGE AVE No Tank Information Given

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HARTFORD ROAD T/2 PH I STORM IMPROV 15755-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY 43340-TANKS 1105 SUNSET AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (KSU) 24195-LUST 66506, postal area, United States Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MCCAIN ENTRY DRIVE 12068-STORMWATER 207 MCCAIN AUDITORIUM OTHER

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-30558-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report KWIK SHOP KDHE-31566-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator AGI BIKE STATION KSD981720352-NCG 612 N MANHATTAN AVE Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator FRANKS CLNRS KSD980967483-NCG 706 N MANHATTAN AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DARA'S FAST LANE #5 07127-LUST 1102 LARAMIE ST Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU NBAF SITE PREPARATION 14108-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KANSAS DEPT AGRICULTURAL BUILDING 16991-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator AMERICAN INST BAKING KSP000000774-NCG 1213 BAKERS WAY Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NATIONAL BIO & AGRO DEFENSE FACILITY 14319-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NORTH MANHATTAN AVE PHASE 3B 23523-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite JERRY'S 66 SERVICE 01510-LUST 2000 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator JERRYS 66 SVC KSD052304821-NCG 2000 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting BRICK REHABILITATION JUULETTE AVE LARAMIE ST MORO ST 20851-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WATER TREATMENT PLT & WELLFIELD IMPVS 13850-STORMWATER 1201 N. 3RD ST. OTHER RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste WALGREEN DRUG STORE #7060 KSR508209400-KSG 325 BLUEMONT AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground VALERO 4162 06984-TANKS 809 N 3RD ST ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite SHORT STOP (LEISZLER) 01507-LUST 720 N 3RD ST Monitor

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground REFUSE CONTROL 42804-TANKS 127 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator KANSAS ENTREPRENEURIAL CTR KSR000500876-NCG 1500 HAYES DR Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator PENSKE AUTO CTR KSR000002436-NCG 401 E POYNTZ AVE Active

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste KSU DIAGNOSTICS & ANALYTICAL SVCS KSR000508226-KSG 2005 RESEARCH PARK CR Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground NAT'L GAS MACHINERY LAB / KSU 43492-TANKS 245 LEVEE DR ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting K STATE SUPERSTORE RETAIL BUILDING 17182-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator MCCALL PATTERN CO KSD054077318-NCG 615 MCCALL RD Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator SUN COUNTRY FOODS KSD062733068-NCG 1111 KRETSCHMER DR Active

EPCRA: Right-to-Know MCCALL PATTERN CO PT00315-RTK 615 MCCALL RD Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WILDCAT CREEK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 14670-STORMWATER WILDCREEK RD RD B/W CORP. CIR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 13110-STORMWATER 7408 E. HWY 24 Inactive

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste RC AUTO BODY KSR000006361-KSG 7845 E US HIGHWAY 24 Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN LEVEE PROJECT 15352-STORMWATER 0810S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting LEISZLER OIL CO 19437-STORMWATER S PORT DR. Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTER 19769-STORMWATER SOUTH PORT DRIVE Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting SALISBURY SUPPLY 17634-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HERITAGE SQUARE NORTH 20947-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator MANHATTAN PIGGING STATION KGS KSR174234938-NCG 3994 ANDERSON AVE Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting STONE POINTE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 12828-STORMWATER 3810 ANDERSON AVE. OTHER

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY 42802-SPILL 1010S07E Closed

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DARA'S FAST LANE #2 07751-LUST 3270 KIMBALL AVE Monitor

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #2 07751-TANKS 3270 KIMBALL AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste ROBBINS MOTOR CO LLC KSD043946318-KSG 3100 ANDERSON AVE Active

Spill Incident Report MEAD LUMBER KDHE-31250-SPILL 1110S07E Closed

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DILLONS #294 FUEL CENTER 23651-LUST 2925 CLAFLIN RD Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground PEERLESS TYRE 19246-TANKS 2829 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WESTLOOP SHOPPING CENTER 14861-STORMWATER 1000 WESTLOOP PL OTHER

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DARA'S FAST LANE #6 01506-LUST 2707 ANDERSON AVE Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN MEDICAL CENTER PH 3 12924-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ST THOMAS MORE ADDITION & RENOVATION 10907-STORMWATER 2900 KIMBALL AVE. OTHER

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-29319-SPILL 1310S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 2216 CLAFLIN TOWNHOMES 14907-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 06208-TANKS 1105 SUNSET AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #1 00190-TANKS 1816 CLAFLIN RD Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NEW SOCCER STADIUM & TOINTON FAMILY STADIUM IMPROVEMENTS 22606-STORMWATER 1800 COLLEGE AVE Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU OCWLF EXCAVATION 16032-STORMWATER 2200 KIMBALL AVE OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU FOUNDATION OFFICE PARK II 21061-STORMWATER 1880 KIMBALL AVE. Inactive

Solid Waste -- Regulated Facilities KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY SATELLITE HHW 916-SOLWASTE KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY EDWARDS HALL Closed: post-closure care completed/not required Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground NATIONAL BIO & AGRO DEFENSE (N 30587-TANKS 1980 DENISON AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator RILEY CO MANHATTAN FIRE DEPT KSD981507619-NCG 2000 DENISON AVE Active

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-30119-SPILL 0610S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting CHILLER PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT 18574-STORMWATER KSU CAMPUS Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 12TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS NORO STREET TO BLUEMONT AVENUE 23834-STORMWATER 701 N 12TH ST Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator ATOMIC AGE KSD985012301-NCG 1214 MORO ST Active

RCRA: Kansas Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste STICKEL CLNRS KSD031328305-KSG 714 N 12TH ST Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite SHOP QUIK #13 08648-LUST 1131 BLUEMONT AVE Monitor

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 917 & 931 MORO APARTMENTS 14649-STORMWATER 1810S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU FOUNDATION 12373-STORMWATER KIMBALL & DENISON - NW CORNER OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU REC CENTER TENNIS COURTS 16098-STORMWATER 101 PETERS REC COMPLEX OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO 82306-TANKS BAKERS WAY No Tank Information Given

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground VERIZON WIRELESS MANHATTAN CAL 44513-TANKS 5960 TECHNOLOGY CIR Tank(s) Temporarily Out or Pending Registration

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-28591-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground JERRY'S 66 SERVICE 01510-TANKS 2000 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-33818-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator STEEL & PIPE SUPPLY CO INC KSD007172703-NCG 205 OSAGE ST Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OLD BIG BLUE BEAUTIFICATION PHASE III & IV 17128-STORMWATER 1810S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting BRICK REHABILITATION JULIETTE AVE PH II LARAMIE ST TO OSAGE ST 21163-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ABBOTT'S LANDING 18761-STORMWATER 425 MCCALL RD. Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MENARDS WAREHOUSE EXPANSION 20981-STORMWATER 515 MCCALL RD. Active

Spill Incident Report SISCO KDHE-28948-SPILL 0810S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report HELENA CHEMICAL CO 44124-SPILL 0810S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PURPLE WAVE ADDITION MANHATTAN KS 11274-STORMWATER 0810S08E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground CAMPBELL DISTRIBUTORS INC 26129-TANKS 825 LEVEE DR ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY 43981-SPILL 1510S07E Closed

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite SHOP QUIK #11 05119-LUST 3108 ANDERSON AVE Monitor

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite OPPY BROS INC 22713-LUST 3001 ANDERSON AVE Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WALGREEN'S MANHATTAN KS 12773-STORMWATER 2711 ANDERSON AVE. OTHER

Spill Incident Report KPL KDHE-06631-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting OPTIMIST BASEBALL FIELDS PH 1 & 2 12785-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator PETERSON CLINICAL LAB PA KSD073043226-NCG 1133 COLLEGE AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KANSAS FARM BUREAU 16469-TANKS 2321 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite KANSAS FARM BUREAU 16469-LUST 2321 ANDERSON AVE Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground TOWN PUMP 01890-TANKS -- ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground CAPITAL CITY OIL 30427-TANKS 2320 SKYVUE LANE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (ANTI FREEZE) KDHE-34705-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU INDOOR BASKETBALL FACILITY 15065-STORMWATER KIMBALL & COLLEGE AVE. Inactive

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (HYDRAULIC OIL) KDHE-33545-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (FERT) KDHE-32583-SPILL 0110S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU TRACK & FIELD RENOVATIONS 21956-STORMWATER R.V. CHRISTIAN TRACK Inactive Spill Incident Report UNKNOWN (DIESEL) KDHE-34219-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MANHATTAN FIRE DEPT 09206-TANKS 2000 DENISON AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Air Quality Title V Permittee - major source KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY MANHATTAN 16100007-AQ1 66506, postal area, United States Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU ENGINEERING EXPANSION PH 4 17653-STORMWATER DURLAND-RATHBONE-FIEDLER HALL OTHER

Spill Incident Report KPL GAS SERVICE KDHE-17587-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting K STATE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT 12331-STORMWATER EAST JARDINE DR. OTHER

Air Quality Title V Permittee - major source NATIONAL BIO AGRO DEFENSE FACILITY 16100038-AQ1 1980 DENISON AVENUE Active

Spill Incident Report NANOSCALE CORP KDHE-31366-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELE CO 08842-TANKS MANHATTAN JUNCTION ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting DENISON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS 3530-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting BRICK REHABILITATION JULIETTE AVE OSAGE TO POYNTZ 22179-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting 4TH STREET & BLUEMONT AVENUE ROUNDABOUT 13476-STORMWATER INTERSECTION OF 4TH & BLUEMONT OTHER

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite VALERO 4162 06984-LUST 809 N 3RD ST Monitor

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SHORT STOP (LEISZLER) 01507-TANKS 720 N 3RD ST ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator RUAN LEASING CO KSD126624949-NCG 121 MCCALL RD Active

EPCRA: Right-to-Know PARKER HANNIFIN CORP PT00277-RTK 1501 HAYES DR Active

RCRA: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste WALMART SUPERCENTER #35 KSD984989582-SQG 101 E BLUEMONT AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground REFUSE CONTROL CO INC 04557-TANKS 127 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WALNUT SUPERCENTER #35 01 558-STORMWATER 1710S08E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 27050-TANKS 1133 HAYES DR ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

EPCRA: Right-to-Know MANKO WINDOW SYSTEMS INC RL00200-RTK 800 HAYES DR Active

Identified Sites MANHATTAN PWS #12 #13 C407503003-ISL HAYES DR AT LEVEE DR Active

Wastewater Treatment Federal/State Facility MANKO WINDOW SYSTEM INC P-KS38-OO02-WWT-FED 800 HAYES DR Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PANERA BREAD @ POYNTZ & SANDER 21544-STORMWATER 325 POINTZ Active

Spill Incident Report MCCALL PATTERN CO KDHE-24841-SPILL 1710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MCCALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 13182-STORMWATER MCCALL RD. BETWEEN HWY 24 OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SHORT STOP #26 30564-TANKS 8207 SOUTHPORT DRIVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting CROWN C CIRCLE IMPROVEMENTS 14903-STORMWATER SO. OF US HWY 24-CONNECTING SOUT OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HERITAGE SQUARE SOUTH 11313-STORMWATER 0910S08E OTHER

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator JANZEN OIL (EAST BULK) KSR000510669-NCG EAST 10TH ST., E. OF VINE ST. Active

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-34107-SPILL 1110S07E Closed

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator OSCO DRUGS KSR000008060-NCG 3003 ANDERSON AVE STE 961 Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator BURNETT AUTOMOTIVE KSD052898558-NCG 2905 ANDERSON AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite PEERLESS TYRE 19246-LUST 2829 ANDERSON AVE Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NEW BOSTON COMMONS 14044-STORMWATER 1310S07E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting SOUTHWIND CAPITAL PUD 566-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting PI KAPPA ALPHA FRATERNITY HOUSE 21067-STORMWATER 2021 COLLEGE VIEW RD. Inactive

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-34216-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-33954-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting K STATE PARKING STRUCTURE 11007-STORMWATER 1810S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting RILEY COUNTY DETENTION POND IMPROVEMENTS 22542-STORMWATER 2101 CLAFLIN RD Inactive Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU SOCCER & FOOTBALL PRACTICE FIELDS 18951-STORMWATER UNKNOWN OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU WEST STADIUM EXPANSION 15874-STORMWATER 1210S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground AGRONOMY RESEARCH FARM 43553-TANKS 2200 KIMBALL AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite DARA'S FASTLANE #12 23180-LUST 1701 ANDERSON AVE Monitor

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO 08823-TANKS 1640 FAIRCHILD AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

EPCRA: Right-to-Know AT&T/SWB MANHATTAN CO K56430 RL00187-RTK 1640 FAIRCHILD AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DYKSTRA HALL 30389-TANKS 1628 CLAFLIN ROAD Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU SCHOOL LEADERSHIP STUDIES 12838-STORMWATER MID CAMPUS DR. & PETTICOAT LN OTHER

Identified Sites GAMBINOS PIZZA PROPERTY C508172160-ISL 1219 BLUEMONT AVE Resolved

Dry Cleaners CINDERELLA CLEANERS 0072-DRYCLEAN 1227 BLUEMONT AVE Closed

Identified Sites STICKEL CLEANERS C508171238-ISL 714 N 12TH ST Active

Solid Waste -- Dumps CITY MANHATTAN #2 (081 MAN#2) 1451-SOL-DUMPS SW:1451 Closed: post-closure care completed/not required

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY JARDINE APTS 15634-STORMWATER 2032 BLDG B/2033 BLDG C OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU BIOSECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1565-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground AGRONOMY RESEARCH FARM 30388-TANKS 2213 AGRONOMY FARM ROAD Tank(s) Currently In Use

Spill Incident Report SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE KDHE-06648-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SHORT STOP #12 30245-TANKS 2010 TUTTLE CREEK BLVD Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground STEEL SUPPLY FORMER MAINT SH 82672-TANKS 121 MCCALL RD No Tank Information Given

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground CONOCO 3RD STREET 82668-TANKS N 3RD ST AND FREMONT ST No Tank Information Given

Identified Sites COIN O MATIC LAUNDRY C508100624-ISL 304 FREMONT ST Resolved

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator ABBOTT MGMT KSD981120272-NCG 227 MCCALL RD Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator EKARTS MOTOR INN INC KSD981497191-NCG 209 SARBER LN Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting RAISING CANE'S #344 21538-STORMWATER 325 E POINTZ AVENUE Inactive

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KMART #7037 26428-TANKS 401 POYNTZ AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MANHATTAN TRANSIT CHARTERS INC 25044-TANKS 225 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 22220-STORMWATER 680 KNOX LANE Inactive

RCRA: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste RELIANCE LABEL SOLUTIONS KSR000502302-SQG 205 N GOLD ST Active

Identified Sites MANHATTAN PWS WELLS #14 & #15 C407503042-ISL 1111 KRETSCHMER DR Resolved

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground JON MURDOCK CHEVROLET INC 28152-TANKS 600 MCCALL RD ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator KANSAS ARNG/FIELD MAINT SHOP 11 KSR000504993-NCG 721 LEVEE DR Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT ACCESS ROAD 13510-STORMWATER SOUTH SIDE HWY 24 B/W LEVEE DR OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground FLINT HILLS FORD 28318-TANKS 7920 EAST HWY 24 Tank(s) Temporarily Out or Pending Registration

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HERITAGE SQUARE NORTH 17093-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MANHATTAN COMMISSION CO INC 05340-TANKS 8424 E US HIGHWAY 24 # E ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting GRAND MERE FIRE STATION 14748-STORMWATER 3900 VANESTA DR. OTHER

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator RILEY CO MANHATTAN FIRE DEPT KSD981507601-NCG 3131 ANDERSON AVE Active

Identified Sites PREHOP CLEANERS C508172418-ISL 1090 WESTLOOP PL. Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground BURNETT PETROLEUM CO INC 02885-TANKS 2905 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground RILEY CO WEED DEPT 24493-TANKS 2711 ANDERSON AVE Tank(s) Temporarily Out or Pending Registration

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite RILEY CO 03981-LUST 2711 ANDERSON AVE Monitor

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MINI MART NO 4 07128-TANKS 2706 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #6 01506-TANKS 2707 ANDERSON AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground FARMERS COOP ASSN 26609-TANKS 118 PIERCE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-27470-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting LEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION 14232-STORMWATER 701 LEE STREET OTHER

Wastewater Treatment Federal/State Facility KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY I-KS38-CO02-WWT-FED UNKNOWN Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KSU FACILITIES MOTOR POOL 44021-TANKS 2610 CLAFLIN RD Tank(s) Currently In Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator WILDCAT BP KSD981699663-NCG 1701 ANDERSON AVE Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground FRED BRAMLAGE COLISEUM 30391-TANKS 1800 COLLEGE AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Stormwater Runoff Permitting EAST MEMORIAL STADIUM WELCOME CENTER 18725-STORMWATER 803 N. 17TH ST. Inactive

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (PAINT) KDHE-33423-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KWIK SHOP #733 28031-TANKS 1337 ANDERSON AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Identified Sites CINDERELLA CLEANERS C508170782-ISL 1227 BLUEMONT AVE Active

Dry Cleaners STICKEL CLEANERS 0095-DRYCLEAN 714 N 12TH ST Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground CITY MANHATTAN 82305-TANKS 615 N 12TH ST No Tank Information Given

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground SHOP QUIK #13 08648-TANKS 1131 BLUEMONT AVE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Spill Incident Report KPL GAS SERVICE KDHE-17576-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY PRACTICE ROWING 16506-STORMWATER 0710S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NORTH MANHATTAN AVE/RESEARCH PARK DR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 17731-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ATO HOUSE MANHATTAN KS 16086-STORMWATER 1632 MCCAIN LN. OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KSU ACKERT HALL 44517-TANKS 66506, postal area, United States Tank(s) Currently In Use

Spill Incident Report KP&L GAS SERVICE KDHE-03232-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground MANHATTAN WATER TREATMENT 82313-TANKS 3RD & BERTRAND No Tank Information Given

Stormwater Runoff Permitting BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE MANHATTAN KS 11300-STORMWATER 121 MCCALL RD OTHER

EPCRA: Toxic Release Inventory Reporter PARKER HANNIFIN MANHATTAN FACILITY 66502PRKRH1501H-TRI 1501 HAYES DR Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting COMFORT SUITES MANHATTAN 12415-STORMWATER 1020 HOSTETLER DR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANKO WAREHOUSE & OFFICE ADDITIONS 23273-STORMWATER 800 HAYES DR Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator BURNETT GOODYEAR AUTO KS0000886077-NCG 400 MCCALL RD Active

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite KEITH NOLL MAINT CTR 05955-LUST 2031 CASEMENT RD Closed

RCRA: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste DCC MANHATTAN INC DBA DRY CLEAN CITY KSR000012807-SQG 427 E POYNTZ AVE Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator ITS GREEK TO ME INC KSR000010389-NCG 520 MCCALL RD Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground PARKER HANNIFIN 07808-TANKS 1501 HAYES DR ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator LEARNING RESOURCES KSD980686877-NCG 1650 HAYES DR Active

EPCRA: Right-to-Know CONTINENTAL MILLS PT00290-RTK 1111 KRETSCHMER DR Active

Spill Incident Report OWEN TRUCKING KDHE-36652-SPILL 1710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MCCALL ROAD PHASE II US 24 RCB 15669-STORMWATER 1710S08E OTHER

Identified Sites MANHATTAN PWS PESTICIDES C407570795-ISL 0810S08E Resolved

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator DICK EDWARDS FORD LINCOLN MERCURY INC KS0000190199-NCG 7920 E US HIGHWAY 24 Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MIDWAY WHOLESALE 17120-STORMWATER 0910S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting HERITAGE COMMONS 10946-STORMWATER 0910S08E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MSHMOB SITE 21839-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting CROWN C & HIGHWAY 24 IMPROVEMENTS 22833-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Active Stormwater Runoff Permitting HERITAGE SQUARE 3180-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting GRAND VISTA ADDITION 10336-STORMWATER 700' WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting AMANDA ARNOLD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITIO 14017-STORMWATER 1010S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground GUERDO 26366-TANKS 2711 AMHERST AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-31671-SPILL 1110S07E Closed

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (SOLVENT) KDHE-34404-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY KDHE-28298-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY 41372-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting NEW DINING CENTER RESIDENCE HALL 18161-STORMWATER UNKNOWN Inactive

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-28158-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting FIELDHOUSE MANHATTAN DONDOMINIUMS 3018-STORMWATER 0110S07E OTHER

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL MANHATTAN 06282-TANKS 1823 COLLEGE AVENUE Tank(s) Currently In Use

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground KANSAS STATE UNIVERSTIY FACI 43909-TANKS 1600 COLLEGE AVE ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Spill Incident Report KP & L GAS SERVICE KDHE-03152-SPILL 1210S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting VANIER FOOTBALL COMPLEX NE EXPANSION 19484-STORMWATER 1800 COLLEGE AVE. Inactive

Spill Incident Report VEHICLE DRIVER 40830-SPILL 0110S07E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU GRAIN SCIENCE PROJECT 555-STORMWATER 0110S07E OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KSU CMG/NABF WATER MAIN RELOCATION 13854-STORMWATER DENISON & KIMBALL AVE. OTHER

Spill Incident Report EMORY SAPP & SONS (HYDRAULIC OIL) KDHE-36274-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (DIESEL) KDHE-34080-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY KDHE-26964-SPILL 1810S08E Closed

Spill Incident Report KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY (PAINT OVER SPRAY RESIDUE) KDHE-34891-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ACTIVITY CENTER 20451-STORMWATER 1415 ANDERSON AVE. Inactive

Spill Incident Report WESTAR ENERGY (TRANSFORMER OIL) KDHE-32639-SPILL 0710S08E Closed

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground DARA'S FAST LANE #5 07127-TANKS 1102 LARAMIE ST ALL Tank(s) Out of Use

Storage Tanks: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Onsite MIXED USE BUILDING (FORMER DAY 82793-LUST 1101 MORO ST. Closed

EPCRA: Right-to-Know VERIZON WIRELESS MANHATTAN 13 (ID:21132495) RL00198-RTK 1531 N 10TH ST Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator ICE HALL KSR000501536-NCG 1310 RESEARCH PARK DR Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting KANSAS DEPT AGRICULTURE RESEARCH LAB 22533-STORMWATER RESEARCH PARK Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator BONAWITZ HENRY D KSD007161318-NCG 310 OSAGE ST Active

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator REFUSE CONTROL INC KSD045089950-NCG 127 MCCALL RD Active

Spill Incident Report HILAND DAIRY KDHE-23400-SPILL 1710S08E Closed

Stormwater Runoff Permitting SIRLOIN STOCKADE DEMOLITION MANHATTAN KS 21337-STORMWATER 325 W. POYNTZ AVE. Inactive

EPCRA: Right-to-Know CHAMPION TEAMWEAR/HANESBRANDS INC PT00317-RTK 520 MCCALL RD Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting LEVEE DRIVE SUBSTATION 16194-STORMWATER WEST OF 605 LEVEE DR. OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MANHATTAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT 13794-STORMWATER 7408 E. HWY 24 OTHER

Stormwater Runoff Permitting MIDLAND EXTERIORS 19326-STORMWATER S PORT DR. Inactive

Stormwater Runoff Permitting TRACTOR SUPPLY 11004-STORMWATER 8110 HERITAGE RD. SOUTH OTHER

RCRA: Not Currently a Generator K S S TRUCK LINE INC KSR000015891-NCG 8424 E US HIGHWAY 24 # E Active

Stormwater Runoff Permitting ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER 23369-STORMWATER 8231 POSITANO DR Active

Storage Tanks: Above and/or Underground NELSON POULTRY FARMS INC 44535-TANKS 8530 E USHY 24 Tank(s) Currently In Use Kansas Department of Health and Environment Environmental Interest Finder

Legend

ISL: Identified Sites List TRI: Toxic Release Inventory Spills LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Air Quality UIC: Underground Injection Wells WW: Waste Water SWR: Storm Water Runoff Dry Cleaners Tanks: Above and Underground Storage Tanks RTK: Right-to- Know RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Solid Waste/ This map product is provided without representation or expressed warranty of accuracy f or any uses bey ond those expressed Data Source: Landfills/ by the originating KDHE program. The originating agencies are not responsible f or publication or use of this product KS Dept of Health and Environment Kansas Data Access & Support Center (DASC) Dumps for purposes other than those expressed. This product may be updated as necessary without prior notif ication. Image Sources: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, ± The use of names/addresses derived from public records for commercial purposes is prohibited under Kansas Law (KSA 45-230). Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), 0 1 Miles Provided as a Public Service by KS Department of Health & Env ironment Printed: May 27, 2020 Explosive and Flammable Hazards (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD-assisted projects must meet N/A 24 CFR Part 51 Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Subpart C requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards. Reference https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/explosive-and-flammable-facilities

1. Is the proposed HUD-assisted project itself the development of a hazardous facility (a facility that mainly stores, handles or processes flammable or combustible chemicals such as bulk fuel storage facilities and refineries)? ☒ No  Continue to Question 2.

☐ Yes Explain:

 Go directly to Question 5.

2. Does this project include any of the following activities: development, construction, rehabilitation that will increase residential densities, or conversion? ☒ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐ Yes  Continue to Question 3.

3. Within 1 mile of the project site, are there any current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers that are covered by 24 CFR 51C? Containers that are NOT covered under the regulation include: • Containers 100 gallons or less in capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OR • Containers of liquified petroleum gas (LPG) or propane with a water volume capacity of 1,000 gallons or less that meet the requirements of the 2017 or later version of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code 58. If all containers within the search area fit the above criteria, answer “no.” For any other type of aboveground storage container within the search area that holds one of the flammable or explosive materials listed in Appendix I of 24 CFR part 51 subpart C, answer “yes.”

☐ No  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide all documents used to make your determination.

☐ Yes  Continue to Question 4.

4. Visit HUD’s website to identify the appropriate tank or tanks to assess and to calculate the required separation distance using the electronic assessment tool. To document this step in the analysis, please attach the following supporting documents to this screen: • Map identifying the tank selected for assessment, and showing the distance from the tank to the proposed HUD-assisted project site; and • Electronic assessment tool calculation of the required separation distance. Based on the analysis, is the proposed HUD-assisted project site located at or beyond the required separation distance from all covered tanks?

☐ Yes  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐ No  Go directly to Question 6.

5. Is the hazardous facility located at an acceptable separation distance from residences and any other facility or area where people may congregate or be present? Please visit HUD’s website for information on calculating Acceptable Separation Distance. ☐ Yes  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide map(s) showing the location of the project site relative to residences and any other facility or area where people congregate or are present and your separation distance calculations.

☐ No  Provide map(s) showing the location of the project site relative to residences and any other facility or area where people congregate or are present and your separation distance calculations. Continue to Question 6.

6. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Mitigation measures may include both natural and manmade barriers, modification of the project design, burial or removal of the hazard, or other engineered solutions. Describe selected mitigation measures, including the timeline for implementation, and attach an implementation plan. If negative effects cannot be mitigated, cancel the project at this location. Note that only licensed professional engineers should design and implement blast barriers. If a barrier will be used or the project will be modified to compensate for an unacceptable separation distance, provide approval from a licensed professional engineer.

Housing Rehab activities address safety, livability and accessibility issues only. Homes rehabilitated or modernized under the Housing Rehab Program will not result in an increased number of people being exposed to hazardous operations and will not increase residential densities, nor convert the type of use. Therefore, the provision of 24 CFR 51C are not implicated and no further action is required.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

CERTIFICATION OF CLERK

I, Brenda K. Wolf, the duly appointed, qualified, and City Clerk of Manhattan, Kansas, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at rd a meeting of the City of Manhattan, Kansas, held on the 3 day of December, 2019, and that said Resolution has been compared by me with the original thereof on file and of record in my office, is a true copy of the whole of said original.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the City of Manhattan, Kansas, 4th day of December, 2019.

______Brenda K. Wolf, CMC, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 120319-B

A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF FORT RILEY, KANSAS, TO THE LOCAL, REGIONAL AND STATE ECONOMY, AND IN SUPPORT OF IMPLEMENTING THE NOTICE OF POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACT NOTIFICATION PROCESS TO INFORM THE PUBLIC AND PROVIDE VOLUNTARY NOISE ATTENUATION CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES TO HELP ENSURE THE CONTINUED OPERATIONAL CAPACITY OF FORT RILEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE NOTICE.

WHEREAS, The City of Manhattan recognizes that continued operation of Fort Riley, Kansas, as a major military installation in the United States is important to the local and regional economy, and the economy of the State of Kansas, and that its future operational capacity should be protected; and

WHEREAS, Fort Riley has an estimated total direct regional economic impact of $1.7 billion; and

WHEREAS, The City of Manhattan partnered in development of the Flint Hills/Fort Riley Joint Land Use Study (JLUS), dated August 2017, with the Flint Hills Regional Council, Fort Riley, Geary County, Riley County, City of Junction City, City of Milford, City of Grandview Plaza, City of Ogden, and the City of Riley; and

WHEREAS, The City of Manhattan subsequently adopted and incorporated the JLUS into the Manhattan Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, through Planning Board Resolution No. 110617-A and City Commission Ordinance No. 7326, dated December 5, 2017; and

WHEREAS, the JLUS identifies growth management strategies to reduce potential impacts of urban encroachment on Fort Riley, while recognizing cities’ and counties’ need to grow; and

WHEREAS, The JLUS identified a number of action items to address noise mitigation and land use compatibility issues, including: conducting a study using an acoustic consultant to determine appropriate methods of noise attenuation construction or other minimization strategies, and creating a uniform noise disclosure real estate process; and

WHEREAS, The Riley County and the City of Manhattan jointly developed a uniform noise disclosure process, the Notice of Potential Nosie Impact (NOPNI), to provide property owners, buyers, realtors, and developers with notice that the property in question may be located in an area that could be subject to noise caused by training activities on Fort Riley, and directs the public to the Riley County website to identify in which noise zone the property is located; and

Exhibit A

Fort Riley Noise Levels

5/26/2020, 3:27:14 PM 1:64,000

RL County Boundary S_WTR_LN_Named 40K-99999 KSRILE008063.sid Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2KSRILE022073.sid Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2 0 0.75 1.5 3mi Red: Band_1 Red: Band_1 Road Centerline 50K-99999 City Boundaries 250-99K KSRILE014063.sid Blue: Band_3 KSRILE030085.sid Blue: Band_3 0 1.25 2.5 5km Overpass Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Water Body 40K-79999 KSRILE022063.sid KSRILE036085.sid Interstate; State Highway; U.S. Highway Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Fort Riley Aerial 18, RL Basemap, RL County Orion Map Service Major Road Paved; Minor Road Paved KSRILE011063.sid Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2KSRILE028073.sid Blue: Band_3 Green: Band_2 Manhattan Regional Airport (MHK) Red: Band_1 Red: Band_1 Interstate, Underpass KSRILE018063.sid Blue: Band_3 KSRILE034078.sid Blue: Band_3 Konza Prairie Natural Area Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Red: Band_1 Median; Off Ramp; On Ramp Riley County GIS RL Basemap | Aerial 18 | RL County Orion Map Service | HUD DNL Noise Attenuation Policy Locations https://www.rileycountyks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/18114/Noise-Attenuation-Guidelines-pdf

https://www.rileycountyks.gov/1844/Fort-Riley-Noise-Zones

https://www.rileycountyks.gov/1853/Notice-of-Potential-Noise-Impacts

https://gisportal.rileycountyks.gov/portal/apps/sites/#/data/pages/fort-riley-noise Noise (CEST Level Reviews)

General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD’s noise regulations protect Noise Control Act of 1972 Title 24 CFR 51 residential properties from Subpart B excessive noise exposure. HUD General Services Administration encourages mitigation as Federal Management Circular appropriate. 75-2: “Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields” References https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/noise-abatement-and- control

1. What activities does your project involve? Check all that apply: ☐ New construction for residential use NOTE: HUD assistance to new construction projects is generally prohibited if they are located in an Unacceptable zone, and HUD discourages assistance for new construction projects in Normally Unacceptable zones. See 24 CFR 51.101(a)(3) for further details.  Continue to Question 4.

☒ Rehabilitation of an existing residential property NOTE: For modernization projects in all noise zones, HUD encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. See 24 CFR 51 Subpart B for further details.  Continue to Question 2.

☐ A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction, interstate, land sales registration, or any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provisions or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

☐ None of the above  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below.

2. Do you have standardized noise attenuation measures that apply to all modernization and/or minor rehabilitation projects, such as the use of double glazed windows or extra insulation? ☒ Yes Indicate the type of measures that will apply (check all that apply): ☒ Improved building envelope components (better windows and doors, strengthened sheathing, insulation, sealed gaps, etc.) ☐ Redesigned building envelope (more durable or substantial materials, increased air gap, resilient channels, staggered wall studs, etc.) ☐ Other Explain: The Riley County Potential Noise Impact Notification Process adopted a noise disclosure procedure whereby the Riley County Deed office is filing a noise disclosure on all property in Riley County that is located within the Noise Disclosure Boundary shown on the map at the bottom of the Resolution.

The Noise Attenuation Construction Guidelines are VOLUNTARY and found in the PDF document at: https://www.rileycountyks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/18114/Noise -Attenuation-Guidelines-pdf. The Guidelines create two levels of attenuation to choose from: Level A which is tied to the LUPZ Noise contour on the attached map, and Level B - tied to Noise Zone II on that same map. The guidelines are for new construction or additions/rehab, if the owner so chooses to follow them, but are not required.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below and provide any supporting documentation.

☐ No  Continue to Question 3.

3. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000’ from a major road, 3000’ from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Describe findings of the Preliminary Screening:

Noise level will be evaluated at each project site on the Tier II level review as applications to the Housing Rehabilitation Program are made.

 Continue to Question 6. 4. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000’ from a major road, 3000’ from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Indicate the findings of the Preliminary Screening below: ☐ There are no noise generators found within the threshold distances above.  Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing the location of the project relative to any noise generators.

☐ Noise generators were found within the threshold distances.  Continue to Question 5.

5. Complete the Noise Assessment Guidelines to quantify the noise exposure. Indicate the findings of the Noise Assessment below: ☐ Acceptable: (65 decibels or less; the ceiling may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in §24 CFR 51.105(a))

Indicate noise level here:

 Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis.

☐ Normally Unacceptable: (Above 65 decibels but not exceeding 75 decibels; the floor may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in 24 CFR 51.105(a))

Indicate noise level here:

Is the project in a largely undeveloped area1? ☐ No Your project requires completion of an Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). Elevate this review to an EA-level review. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6.

☐ Yes Your project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). Elevate this review to an EIS-level review. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6.

1 A largely undeveloped area means the area within 2 miles of the project site is less than 50 percent developed with urban uses and does not have water and sewer capacity to serve the project.

☐ Unacceptable: (Above 75 decibels)

Indicate noise level here:

Your project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). You may either complete an EIS or provide a waiver signed by the appropriate authority. Indicate your choice:

☐ Convert to an EIS  Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6.

☐ Provide waiver  Provide an Environmental Impact Statement waiver from the Certifying Officer or the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development per 24 CFR 51.104(b)(2) and noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 6.

6. HUD strongly encourages mitigation be used to eliminate adverse noise impacts. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. This information will be automatically included in the Mitigation summary for the environmental review.

☐ Mitigation as follows will be implemented:

If warranted, Mitigation actions will be included as part of the Tier II review and included as part of the Scope of Work for each Project Site.

 Provide drawings, specifications, and other materials as needed to describe the project’s noise mitigation measures. Continue to the Worksheet Summary. ☐ No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here:

Mitigation actions will not be included in the Scope of Work for each Project Site

if the Tier II review shows noise at or below acceptable levels.

 Continue to the Worksheet Summary.

Noise level will be evaluated at each project site on the Tier II level review. If warranted,

Mitigation actions will be included as part of the Tier II review and included as part of the Scope of Work for each Project Site. A HUD DNL Calculation will be included in the Tier 2 Review for each site.

Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? ☐ Yes ☒ No

TIER II STATUTORY CHECKLIST

Use this worksheet for projects that are Categorically Excluded under 24 CFR §58.35(a).

This document will be completed for each individual housing rehabilitation site location, uploaded into HEROS with supporting documents attached and hardcopies maintained in Property Address: the site location file at the City.

ERR FILE # CDBG 2020 (optional)

The "ERR Determination" and “Statutory Checklist” forms are incorporated herein. This checklist is a component of the Environmental Review Record (ERR) [§58.38]. Supplement the ERR, as appropriate, with photographs, site plans, maps, narrative and other information that describe the project.

24 CFR §58.5 - NEPA-Related Federal Statutes and Authorities – TIER II

DIRECTIONS - For each authority, check one of the appropriate boxes under "Status." "A box" The project is in compliance, either because: (1) the nature of the project does not implicate the authority under consideration, or (2) supporting information documents that project compliance has been achieved. In either case, information must be provided as to WHY the authority is not implicated. or HOW compliance is met: OR "B box" The project cannot be brought into compliance, or compliance cannot be economically achieved. IMPORTANT: Compliance documentation consists of verifiable source documents and/or relevant base data. Appropriate documentation must be provided for each law or authority. Documents may be incorporated by reference into the ERR provided that each source document is identified and available for inspection by interested parties. Proprietary material and studies that are not otherwise generally available for public review shall be included in the ERR. Refer to HUD guidance for more information.

1. Air Quality STATUS: A B  Does the Project anticipate removal of roofing, siding, mastic, floor tiles, ceiling tiles or other substance that may be Asbestos Containing Materials? Yes No

 Is the Project located within a county that is designated Zone I by the EPA (http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap/kansas.htm)? Yes No

 Does the property have an elevated level of radon gas (>4.0 picocuries per liter) Yes No If yes, contact KHRC.

If yes to any of the above, describe the mitigation action that will occur: Project involves Rehabilitation of a LMI owned single family home which may or may not include disturbing materials that containing Asbestos materials. Asbestos: The project site will be assessed and necessary remediation will be included in the description of work to be completed. Radon: Zone1. All of Riley County is in Zone 1, and each site is tested for Radon as part of the project site review. If the site has an elevated level of radon, the City will include remediation measures as part of the site’s rehabilitation activities.

2. Contamination and Toxic Substances [24 CFR 58.5(i)(2)] STATUS: A B  Is the project near (w/in 1,000 feet) a dump or landfill site? Yes No

 Is the project near (w/in 300 feet) an industry handling chemicals or hazardous wastes? Yes No

 Is the project adjacent to or across the street from a gasoline station? Yes No

 Are there other unusual conditions on site or along the perimeter such as:  Distressed vegetation  Odors of chemical, solvent or petroleum nature  Waste material/ waste containers  Soil staining, pools of liquid  Loose/empty drums, barrels  Oil/chemical spills  Abandoned machinery, cars, refrigerators, etc.  Transformers, fill/vent pipes, pipelines, drainage structures Yes No

 Other Considerations

 Does the Project anticipate removal of florescent light fixtures? Yes No

 Does the Project anticipate removal of a HVAC system? Yes No

 Is a mercury-filled tipping mechanism (thermostat) to be removed? Yes No

 Is there a Freon-based AC unit to be replaced? Yes No

Based consultation with City of Manhattan staff and a site review conducted on ______by Shaun Linenberger, Housing Rehabilitation Inspector, the subject property does not appear to be contaminated or in proximity to other contaminated sites.

If yes to any of the above, describe the mitigation action that will occur: Project involves rehabilitation of LMI owned single family homes and may or may not include disturbing contaminated materials. Each housing Rehab project location will be evaluated on Tier 2 level review. No project site impacted by contamination or toxic substances will be eligible.

3. Explosive or Flammable Operations [24 CFR 51 C] STATUS: A B As the eligible activities entail rehabilitation of occupied single-family home without any change in unit density or change in land use, the provisions of Explosive and Flammable Operations (24 CFR 51C) are not implicated, thus no further action is required.

Mitigation Activities are not needed for this project.

4. Floodplain Management [24 CFR 55, Executive Order 11988] STATUS: A B Property is not located in a flood plain per FIRM map, community panel ______, dated ______.

Mitigation Activities: If a property is in a flood hazard area, project will be rejected. City CDBG Rehabilitation Policy actively excludes any property in an identified flood hazard area.

5. Historic Preservation [36 CFR 800] STATUS: A B Section 106 review conducted on the site by the Kansas Historical Society determined that no historic properties will be affected by the project, pursuant to KHS letter dated ______

If a historic or potentially historic property will be affected, the Kansas Historical Society and appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Offices will be contacted. Each property is assessed to determine its historic status or potential, and the Kansas SHPO office is contacted for direction, or the Programmatic agreement is followed. Tribes that may have interest in properties within city limits will be consulted.

6. Noise Control [24 CFR 51 B] STATUS: A B The proposed site is not within 5 miles of a major civil airport, 15 miles of a military airfields, 1,000 feet of a major highway or road, or 3,000 feet of a railroads (maps attached),

If within one of these threshold distances, a HUD Noise Analysis must be conducted and mitigation (or rejection) must occur, as appropriate. Project involves rehabilitation of LMI owned single family homes and may or may not include locations near the types of infrastructure mentioned above. Each site location will be evaluated for impact on a site by site basis.

Summary of Findings and Conclusions DETERMINATION:

Box "A" has been checked for all authorities. The activity can proceed and funds may be drawn down; OR Box "B" has been' checked for one or more authority. The project cannot proceed since one or more authority requires compliance which either has not been resolved or cannot be economically resolved. Failure to resolve all authority compliance issues will result in denial of the activity.

PREPARER SIGNATURE: DATE:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Shaun Linenberger, Housing Rehabilitation Inspector PART 58.6 Review

Property Address:

ERR FILE #: CDBG PY 2019 – Housing Rehabilitation Projects REQUIREMENTS listed at 24 CFR 58.6

1. AIRPORT RUNWAY CLEAR ZONES AND CLEAR ZONES NOTIFICATION [24 C.F.R. Part 51.303(a)(3)] Does the project involve the sale or acquisition of property located within a Civil Airport Runway Clear Zone or a Military Airfield Clear Zone? No. Cite or attached Source Document: Activity does not include the acquisition of property, thus the requirements of this authority are not implicated. (Project complies with 24 CFR 51.303(a)(3).)

Yes. Notice must be provided to buyer. The notice must advise the buyer that the property is in a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone, what the implications of such a location are, and that there is a possibility that the property may, at a later date, be acquired by the airport operator. The buyer must sign a statement acknowledging receipt of this information, and a copy of the signed notice must be maintained in this ERR.

2. COASTAL BARRIERS RESOURCES ACT [Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3501)] Is the project located in a coastal barrier resource area? No. Cite or attached Source Document: No CBRA in Kansas http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/mystate/welcome.html (Proceed with project.) Yes. Federal assistance may not be used in such an area.

3. FLOOD DISASTER PROTECTION ACT [Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4128)] Does the project involve acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of structures located in a FEMA-identified Special Flood Hazard Area? No. Cite or attached Source Document: Property is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area per FIRM map, community panel ______, dated ______. (Proceed with project.)

Yes. Cite or attached Source Document: Is the community participating in the National Insurance Program (or has less than one year passed since FEMA notification of Special Flood Hazards)?

Yes. Flood Insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program must be obtained. If HUD assistance is provided as a grant, insurance must be maintained for the economic life of the project and in the amount of the total project cost (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). If HUD assistance is provided as a loan, insurance must be maintained for the term of the loan and in the amount of the loan (or up to the maximum allowable coverage, whichever is less). A copy of the flood insurance policy declaration must be kept on file in the ERR. No. Federal assistance may not be used in the Special Flood Hazards Area.

Responsible Entity Official: Signature / Name / Date