DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary Technical Scoping Report March 2003 Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary Technical Scoping Report Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD March 2003 Publishing organisation Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 © Environment Agency March 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. Statement of use This document provides information for use by the Environment Agency in scoping the Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary project. Contract Statement This report presents the scoping exercise conducted by HR Wallingford for Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary. The Environment Agency, whose representative was Sarah Lavery, commissioned the study and the HR Wallingford Job Number was DAS 0806. Mervyn Littlewood and Matt Crossman prepared the report with key contributions from Paul Sayers, David Ramsbottom, Dr Richard Whitehouse, Dr Peter Hawkes, Dr Mike Dearnaley, Roy Atkins and Silvia Segura. The HR Wallingford responsible Director was Dr Jane Smallman. Key members of client and project team Prepared by ................................................................................... Mervyn Littlewood and Matt Crossman HR Wallingford, Project Managers Approved by ................................................................................... Dr Jane Smallman HR Wallingford, Director ................................................................................... Sarah Lavery Environment Agency, Project Manager HR Wallingford accepts no liability for the use by third parties of results or methods presented in this report. The Company also stresses that various sections of this report rely on data supplied by or drawn from third party sources. HR Wallingford accepts no liability for loss or damage suffered by the client or third parties as a result of errors or inaccuracies in such third party data. PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE THAMES ESTUARY TECHNICAL SCOPING REPORT - ii - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Large areas of the Thames Estuary are potentially at risk from tidal flooding and are currently protected to a high standard by the defences constructed in the late 1970s and early 1980s, which included the Thames Barrier at Woolwich and raised defences eastwards to Southend-on-Sea and the Isle of Grain. Most of these flood defences were designed to last until approximately 2030. The Environment Agency has recently started the process of planning their future strategy for managing flood risk in the Thames Estuary in order to ensure that it is in place before large-scale works are required. This report provides a context for the defences, it reviews available information and identifies key opportunities and constraints relating to the physical environment, existing management framework for the defences, assets at risk from flooding and appropriate boundaries for future studies. Flood risk within the estuary is not simply dependent on the water level at sea (which itself results from a combination of factors), but influenced by a complex combination of meteorological factors, fluvial flows, estuary morphology and the operation of the flood defences. The area of influence extends to the whole of the Thames catchments and some distance into the North Sea Due to the size and importance of the estuary the development of a flood risk strategy will clearly be a difficult undertaking, demanding a good understanding of a wide range of processes and issues including hydrodynamics, environmental, economic and social factors associated with flooding and potential schemes. Reliable decision-making within such a complex environment will require the development and application of a well-structured approach drawing on existing best practice and knowledge as well as the results of the latest research.. It will undoubtedly be necessary to adopt a tiered approach to decision-making, solving issues at a manageable local scale, but within a regional framework that recognises opportunities and constraints on an estuary wide scale. The summary of hydraulic processes within the estuary identifies considerable gaps in information and understanding where further data will probably be required. One significant concern relates to the reliability of water level records and predictions. There is also only limited information available on the performance and condition of the existing defences and some uncertainty as to the accuracy of the indicative floodplain mapping published by the Environment Agency. This situation will be improved with the development of the National Flood and Coast Defence Database and completion of a number of studies in 2003. The initial assessment of assets at risk of flooding divided the indicative tidal floodplain between Teddington and Foulness Point / Whitstable into 43 flood risk compartments covering a total 468 km2 with capital values totalling more than £99,000 million. Recommendations for the scope and timing of further studies are presented within ‘Advisory Report No. 1 in support of project development’ which has been prepared concurrently. For further information regarding the information contained in this report please contact Paul Sayers or Jane Smallman at HR Wallingford. PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE THAMES ESTUARY TECHNICAL SCOPING REPORT - iii - PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE THAMES ESTUARY TECHNICAL SCOPING REPORT - iv - CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1. Introduction 1 2. The Thames Estuary – A Context 2 2.1 Historical development of the Thames 3 2.2 Hydraulic drivers of flood risk 9 2.3 Hydraulic drivers and ecology 17 2.4 Overview of the defence system 18 2.5 Sediment processes and morphological response 20 2.6 Socio – economic constraints and opportunities 22 2.7 Recommendations 24 3. The Physical Environment 26 3.1 Hydraulic drivers 26 3.2 Sediment processes and morphology 36 3.3 The existing flood defence system 40 3.4 Environmental responses 43 3.5 Recommendations 43 4. Existing Management Framework 45 4.1 High level multi-disciplinary guidance 45 4.2 Flood and coastal defence policy and strategy 47 4.3 National and regional guidance and policy 50 4.4 Environmental, habitat and biodiversity 56 4.5 Recommendations 60 5. Identification of Assets at Risk from Flooding 62 5.1 Topography and ‘flood cells’ 62 5.2 Review of assets at risk from flooding 63 5.3 Future change scenarios 65 5.4 Definition of proposed valuation methodology for each asset type 66 5.5 Review of data for use in assessing economic impacts of flooding 66 5.6 Recommendations 69 6. Study Boundaries 70 6.1 Temporal 70 PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE THAMES ESTUARY TECHNICAL SCOPING REPORT - v - CONTENTS CONTINUED 6.2 Management / intervention 71 6.3 Physical Processes / Understanding 72 6.4 Recommendations 72 7. Recommendations 74 8. References 77 Tables Table 2.1 Ranked extreme high waters at London Bridge and Sheerness 6 Table 2.2 Classification of flood defences by immediate hinterland 23 Table 3.1 Environment Agency water level data 27 Table 3.2 Port of London Authority water level data 27 Table 3.3 Tributaries and creeks discharging into the Thames Estuary 29 Table 3.4 Consented discharges into the Thames Estuary in 1995 29 Table 3.5 Consented discharges into tributaries in 1995 30 Table 3.6 Tidal current data 32 Table 3.7 ADP data sets 33 Table 3.8 Defence types comprising the Tidal Walls 40 Table 3.9 Approximate cost of existing tidal defences 41 Table 4.1 North Kent Shoreline Management Policy 47 Table 4.2 South Essex Shoreline Management Policy 48 Table 4.3 Indicative standards of protection (after MAFF 1999) 52 Table 4.4 Planning response to sequential characterisation of flood risk 54 Table 4.5 Summary of Water Level Management Plans 59 Table 5.1 Distribution of assets within the different flood risk compartments 63 Table 5.2 Proposed development within the Thames Gateway ‘Zones of Change’ 65 Figures Figure 2.1 Annual maxima tide levels at Sheerness 6 Figure 2.2 The 1953 surge 12 Figure 2.3 The 1953 and mean spring high water levels 13 Figure 3.1 An example of acoustic backscatter measurement of suspended solids concentration and other associated parameters 37 PLANNING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE THAMES ESTUARY TECHNICAL SCOPING REPORT - vi - CONTENTS CONTINUED Figure 4.1 Hierarchy of plans (after MAFF 2001b) 51 Drawings Drawing 01 Indicative flood risk areas in the Thames Estuary Drawing 02 Thames River basin Drawing 03 Geology Drawing 04 Tidal defence system Drawing 05 Environment Agency boundaries Drawing 06 Local authority boundaries Drawing 07 Population Drawing 08 Hydraulic measures locations Drawing 09 Discharges and outfalls Drawing 10 Wind and wave data Drawing 11 PLA chart extents Drawing 12 Environmental designations Drawing 13 Environmental resources Drawing 14 Archaeology Drawing 15 Extents of policy and strategy studies Drawing 16 Topography Drawing 17 Flood cells Drawing 18 Proposed development areas Drawing 19 Topographic data coverage Drawing 20 Relevant boundaries Appendices Appendix A Planning for Flood Risk Management in the Thames Estuary 83 Appendix B The Outer Thames Estuary 97 Appendix C Combined Sewage Outfalls –
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greenwich TC Visitor
    Greenwich Meridian Island C to The O2 H Island R I L and Blackwall Tunnel D Gardens S A L WE RO PELTON T St. Joseph ST FERRY RO A Gardens AD C E T H ham RC Church W es N P U ath K A OO GREENWICH R LW C W ICH EET L C RO STR A AD L FERRY H B C A W AN L L A A V to East TOWN CENTRE Y S H S 6 E N O E 0 R 2 AN Greenwich Library, L T S S L A Trinity K The Forum E I DA S Thames Barrier and N T D Thames Path S R @ Greenwich OA R M Hospital O LE E R Woolwich S E A T A T H R D Tunnel T E R C E A E O ROA T G A L L A R Highbridge F O L D Greenwich Foot A M R S Wharf W . T B 16 ST R AD O E E V O S I N R R O A UT CH LN T CR I D A . LW W RD R E E Greenwich O E V O TR E AD W S RO USKAR S T A T TR T LE D E F A Pier L N D 4 O E T R R NAN O E AN OLD B B E ach I T Re R Greenwich S H Arches U ROYAL D E P G WOO L A R A R N G COLLEGE WAY S T R E Leisure D T AD ha K E RO NAVAL 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • SAILING DIRECTIONS for the RIVER THAMES. Norie, 1817 (Medway and Harwich Etc Omitted)
    14/09/2020 Sailing Directions,Norie 1817 - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE SAILING DIRECTIONS FOR THE RIVER THAMES. Norie, 1817 (Medway and Harwich etc omitted) https://thames.me.uk/sailing1817.htm 1/12 14/09/2020 Sailing Directions,Norie 1817 - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE https://thames.me.uk/sailing1817.htm 2/12 14/09/2020 Sailing Directions,Norie 1817 - WHERE THAMES SMOOTH WATERS GLIDE THE SAILING DIRECTIONS FOR THE RIVER THAMES,1817 Note. - Throughout the following Work, the Soundings are those taken at low Water, Spring Tides: the Bearings and Courses are Magnetic, or by Compass, an the Distances are in Nautic Miles, of 60 to a degree. The Variation allowed is Two Points and a Quarter West. It may be proper to premise, that the Sands in the River Thames frequently change their shapes and situations, thereby rendering many of the marks to avo them, obsolete, we shall endeavour to give such description as is adapted to the present time, leaving the Mariner to make such alterations as may hereafter b found necessary. Links to the latest mini charts from the Port of London Authority for comparison FROM LONDON BRIDGE TO THE NORE AND SHEERNESS. THE UPPER POOL, MODERN PLA chart THE UPPER POOL, 1817 The Upper Pool from London Bridge to Wappingness, lies nearly S.E. and N.W. Off the Custom-house is a shoal; and at Horsleydown-middle-tier, a hard shelf, on which are only 6 feet. Just above Fountain-stairs also is a shoal, which almost dries at low water; to avoid this, you must keep well over towards the ships at Wappingness.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkside-Brochure.Pdf
    www.parkside-e3.com Parkside is a beautifully designed new build development perfectly placed between Canary Wharf to the south, Westfield Stratford City to the north and The City of London to the west. It offers an exclusive collection of 52 private apartments and duplexes over 3 blocks. Although it’s set on a manicured park, most apartments enjoy very generous outside space – a rarity in central London these days. The development also boasts beautifully landscaped courtyards and gardens for residents’ use. For ease, all the apartments are accessible by lift. While for complete peace of mind, there’s a video entry system. Inside the apartments materials of the highest quality are used. With fully integrated designer kitchens, engineered wide board oak flooring and fully tiled luxurious bathrooms, these apartments will appeal to a discerning array of professionals and investors. In short, with its combination of a prime location, luxury finishes and excellent transport links, Parkside perfectly embodies the best of metropolitan living. A STUNNING PARKSIDE LOCATION MOMENTS FROM CANARY WHARF computer generated image FURZE GREEN & LIMEHOUSE CANAL With its setting overlooking a beautiful park just moments from one of London’s historic waterways, Parkside offers a perfect escape from the hustle of London. Just minutes from Canary Wharf and The City, residents can stretch their legs and their lungs with a multitude of open spaces to choose from. These include the Limehouse Canal, Furze Green, Mile End Park, Bartlett Park, Victoria Park (one of London’s oldest and largest). Finally the vast expanse of the largest park to be built in Europe over the past 100 years can be found minutes away at the former Olympic Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyola University New Orleans Study Abroad
    For further information contact: University of East London International Office Tel: +44 (0)20 8223 3333 Email: [email protected] Visit: uel.ac.uk/international Docklands Campus University Way London E16 2RD uel.ac.uk/international Study Abroad uel.ac.uk/international Contents Page 1 Contents Page 2 – 3 Welcome Page 4 – 5 Life in London Page 6 – 9 Docklands Campus Page 10 – 11 Docklands Page 12 – 15 Stratford Campus Page 16 – 17 Stratford Page 18 – 19 London Map Page 20 – 21 Life at UEL Page 23 Study Abroad Options Page 25 – 27 Academic School Profiles Page 28 – 29 Practicalities Page 30 – 31 Accommodation Page 32 Module Choices ©2011 University of East London Welcome This is an exciting time for UEL, and especially for our students. With 2012 on the horizon there is an unprecedented buzz about East London. Alongside a major regeneration programme for the region, UEL has also been transformed. Our £170 million campus development programme has brought a range of new facilities, from 24/7 multimedia libraries and state-of-the-art clinics,to purpose-built student accommodation and, for 2011, a major new sports complex. That is why I am passionate about our potential to deliver outstanding opportunities to all of our students. Opportunities for learning, for achieving, and for building the basis for your future career success. With our unique location, our record of excellence in teaching and research, the dynamism and diversity provided by our multinational student community and our outstanding graduate employment record, UEL is a university with energy and vision. I hope you’ll like what you see in this guide and that you will want to become part of our thriving community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hydrography & Cartography of a Great
    THE HYDROGRAPHY & CARTOGRAPHY OF A GREAT SEAPORT by C o m m a n d e r E. C. SHANKLAHD, R. H. R., F. R . S. E., R i v e r S uperintendent a n d H ydrographic S u r v e y o r , P o r t o f L o n d o n A u t h o r i t y . The Port of London Authority exercises jurisdiction over that part of the Thames which flows from Teddington Lock (approximately) to a line joining Havengore Creek in Essex and Warden Point in Sheppey, Kent. To depict the changes in the hydrography of the channels, creeks, whar­ ves, bridges and dock entrances the survey of the river requires continuous attention. CARTOGRAPHY. Within the dock system a regular watch is kept to maintain depth, as a considerable amount of silt in suspension finds its way inside the tidal gates. The triangulation and surveyor’s working sheets are connected with those of the Ordnance Survey and are divided up into convenient lengths of river, more or less identified with the Reaches so well known to mariners. The survey sheets and the scales on which they are projected are enumerated in the following table. LIST OF SURVEYS — RIVER THAMES TIDEWAY Chxvt Section of River. Date of Scale Survey i. 1929 1/1056 2. Cross Deep to Petersham Drawdock.................................................... 1929 )) 3- Petersham Drawdock to Richmond Lock and Weir........................ 1929 )) )) 4 - Richmond Lock and Weir to Church Ferry, Isleworth.................. 1928 *>• 1928 )) 6. 1927 )) )) 7- 1926-7 8. Barnes R ailw ay Bridge to Chiswick Ferry.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Destination London the Expansion of the Visitor Economy
    DESTINATION LONDON THE EXPANSION OF THE VISITOR ECONOMY EDITED BY ANDREW SMITH and ANNE GRAHAM Destination London: The Expansion of the Visitor Economy Edited by Andrew Smith and Anne Graham University of Westminster Press www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Published by University of Westminster Press 115 New Cavendish Street London W1W 6UW www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Text © the editors and several contributors 2019 First published 2019 Cover and back cover image: Diana Jarvis; Front cover image: Tristan Luker Print and digital versions typeset by Siliconchips Services Ltd. ISBN (Paperback): 978-1-912656-26-4 ISBN (PDF): 978-1-912656-27-1 ISBN (EPUB): 978-1-912656-28-8 ISBN (Kindle): 978-1-912656-29-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book35 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This license allows for copying and distributing the work, provid ing author attribution is clearly stated, that you are not using the material for commercial purposes, and that modified versions are not distributed. The full text of this book has been peer-reviewed to ensure high academic standards. For full review policies, see: http://www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk/ site/publish. Suggested citation: Smith, A. and Graham, A. (eds.) 2019. Destination London: The Expansion of the Visitor Economy. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book35 License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 To read the free, open access version of this book online, visit https://doi.org/10.16997/ book35 or scan this QR code with your mobile device: Contents Acknowledgements vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside Coverage Introduction
    Exceptional Riverside Coverage Introduction Few, if any, international agents can offer property is given the absolute maximum exposure, by their clients better coverage along the river than people best placed to sell its benefits and understand Knight Frank. With 10 of our 29 offices in London its eccentricities. (and growing) directly covering areas on the Thames, In the following pages you will see a clear Knight Frank has expert teams that are able to share distinction between the river’s architectural styles their vast knowledge of the river and ensure that and local attractions, as well as the locations of property is offered to applicants that have registered strategically placed Knight Frank offices, maximising interest, simply in living on the River Thames and not our riverside coverage. in a local area specifically. Knight Frank is a globally trusted brand We are experts in riverside locations that and its concentration on excellent riverside property widely vary in character and local amenities, existing in London is a clear message to clients, buyers and infrastructure and ongoing development, financial tenants from all over the world that we have this hubs and suburban oases. This ensures that your market well and truly covered. Matthew Smith Riverside Office Head T: +44 20 3597 7670 [email protected] Richmond Richmond and the river have a very • Waterloo in under 20 minutes, District Line distinguished history portrayed by many artists over underground to Sloane Square in 30 minutes the centuries with, most notably, the views from the top • Stunning Royal Parks including the amazing of Richmond Hill over Petersham Meadows towards 2,300 acres of Richmond Park Twickenham immortalised by both Reynolds and Turner.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 6 – Zonal Plans & Maps
    MEDWAY COUNCIL SHORELINE OIL POLLUTION AND CHEMICAL SPILL EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION 6 – ZONAL PLANS & MAPS 145 FEB 2011 MEDWAY COUNCIL SHORELINE OIL POLLUTION AND CHEMICAL SPILL EMERGENCY PLAN 1 Zone Summaries 1.1 River Thames and Estuary Zone Notation corresponds with the Map Index used in the Port of London Authority Oil Spill Contingency Plan. PLA Zone 066: Cliffe Fort PLA Zone 067: Lower Hope Point PLA Zone 068: Cliffe Fleet/Blythe Sands PLA Zone 069: Halstow Marshes/Cliffe Fleet PLA Zone 070: St Mary Marshes PLA Zone 071: Allhallows PLA Zone 072: Yantlet Creek/Lees Marshes PLA Zone 073: Grain 1.2 River Medway and Swale Estuary Zone Notation differs from revised Map Index used in the Medway Ports Authority Oil MedSpill Plan. The corresponding Medway Ports Plan zone is listed in brackets. Medway Council Oil Spill Medway Ports Oil Response Plan Zones Contingency Spill Plan Zones Zone 2A: Medway Estuary Mouth (MP Zone 2) Zone 2B: Stoke Ooze (MP Zone 2) Zone 2C: Hoo Flats/Kingsnorth (MP Zone 2/3) Zone 2D: Copperhouse Marshes/ Rainham Creek (MP Zone 2/3) Zone 3: Basin 3 (MP Zone 3) Zone 3A: Basin ½ (MP Zone 3) Zone 4: Chatham Docks/Rochester Bridge (MP Zone 3) 146 FEB 2011 MEDWAY COUNCIL SHORELINE OIL POLLUTION AND CHEMICAL SPILL EMERGENCY PLAN Zone 5: Rochester Bridge/Halling (MP Zone 4) 147 FEB 2011 MEDWAY COUNCIL SHORELINE OIL POLLUTION AND CHEMICAL SPILL EMERGENCY PLAN 2 Zonal Plans 2.1 Introduction - Zones PLA 66 - 73 The following zonal plans contain maps and information on: 1) The type of shoreline 2) Sensitivities 3) Clean-up recommendations 4) Access routes 5) Ecology 6) Amenity impact 7) Industrial and economic implications 8) Other relevant information The zones are numbered PLA 66 to PLA 73; these zone numbers correspond to the zones 66 – 73, as in the Port Of London Authority - Oil Spill Contingency Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Heritage Asset Review 2017 Final Draft: November 2017
    Medway Heritage Asset Review 2017 Final Draft: November 2017 Executive Summary The Medway Heritage Asset Review intends to provide a comprehensive overview of the heritage assets in Medway in order to inform the development of a Heritage Strategy to support the emerging Medway Local Plan 2015. Medway benefits from a rich heritage spanning millennia, underpinning the local distinctiveness and creating a unique and special character that can be readily interpreted through the historic environment. The main report is broken down into sections, initially looking at the topography of Medway and how this influenced human settlement in the area, then looking at the development of the key settlements in Medway; taking into consideration the key drivers for their establishment and identifying existing heritage assets. Furthermore, the main influences to development in the area are also considered; including Chatham Dockyard and the military, the brick, cement and lime industry, agriculture, maritime and religion. Through investigating Medway’s history both geographically and thematically, the significance of heritage assets and the importance of historic landscapes can be readily identified; enabling a better understanding and providing opportunities to enhance their enjoyment. Non-designated heritage assets are also identified using a broad range of sources; providing a deeper knowledge of what shapes the distinct local character experienced in Medway and the how this identity is of great importance to the local community. The report concludes with suggestions for additional areas of research and identifies themes to be considered to inform the development of a coherent and robust Heritage Strategy that will help enhance, understand and celebrate Medway’s heritage for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Tower Bridge
    Tower Bridge Tower Bridge was opened in 1894, and at the time was the largest bascule bridge in the world. The bascules are the two central lower parts that lift up for tall boats and ships to pass under the bridge. It took 8 years to build, 432 construction workers and 11000 tons of steel. It is an iconic building in London and is known around the world as well as playing host to events such as the London Marathon. Stink and Stench For many years, most of the city’s rubbish, food and toilet waste was dumped in the river! In 1858, the smell coming from the river was so disgusting that Parliament (which is on the banks of the Thames) had to be suspended. Consequently, the government decided to find a way to rid the Thames of sewage. Along came Sir Joseph Bazalgette who built a sewerage system for London. Frozen History Before the 19th century, cold winter temperatures would sometimes freeze the surface of the Thames. ‘Frost Fairs’ would be held on the ice, where Londoners could dance, skate and drink. The last fair was in 1814 and it appears unlikely there will ever be another one because the river now flows too quickly for the water to freeze. Thames Frost Fair, 1683-84, Thomas Wyke The Tower of London Since 1066, when William the Conqueror founded it, The Tower of London has stood on the North bank of the Thames. Over its long history, the Tower of London has hosted Kings and Queens as well as being a prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Medway ~ Sheerness ~ Port Victoria Stangate Creek ~ Colemouth ~ Long Reach Cockham Wood ~ Chatham ~ the Upper Medway
    chapter iv The River Medway ~ Sheerness ~ Port Victoria Stangate Creek ~ Colemouth ~ Long Reach Cockham Wood ~ Chatham ~ The Upper Medway 4 When one’s little vessel has safely crossed the dangers of the Grain Spit, and is running into the Medway with a fair wind, there is time to take a look round, and feast one’s eyes upon the moving panorama of shipping. On the east side there is the fort on Garrison Point, and the dockyards, and the big iron sheers towering high above all the buildings; on the west side there is the old Martello tower, with Cockleshell Hard and Port Victo- ria beyond. In the middle, the guardship Duncan, a screw frigate of the early days of steam, used to swing to the tide at her moorings until quite lately. Round about there lie other men-of-war, some large and some small; a liner, or swift cruiser, or a torpedo catcher, and a training schoon- er flying the pennant; then there is the Chatham steamer alongside the pier taking in or discharging passengers, and a fleet of barges coming out or running into the river in procession from the Medway to the Thames, or from the Thames to the Medway; a Norwegian timber-laden brig or schooner, and a ketch or two from some of the ports on the east coast, are usually to be seen brought up off Cock- leshell Hard. 55 swin, swale and swatchway To the southward can be descried the beacon which marks the entrance to the Queenborough Swale, where the Flushing steamers lie, and in the distance beyond are the hills of Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of LORDS Parliamentary Debates
    7 Volume Index to the HOUSE OF LORDS Parliamentary Debates SESSION 2015–16 11th January, 2016—11th February, 2016 (VOLUME 768) Obtainable on standing order only - The first time a Member speaks to a new piece of parliamentary business, the following abbreviations are used to show their party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Ind UU Independent Ulster Unionist Lab Labour LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2016, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 11th January, 2016—11th February, 2016 1 - INDEX TO THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT INDEX FOR SESSION 2015–16, Volume 768 11th January, 2016—11th February, 2016 EXPLANATION OF ARRANGEMENT AND ABBREVIATIONS Dates of proceedings are indicated by numerals in brackets. Volume numbers are shown in square brackets. Bills: Read First, Second or Third Time = 1R, 2R, 3R. Column numbers in italics refer to Written Answers. - - - Aberdare, Lord: Age of Criminal Responsibility Bill Airports: Adult Education and Lifelong [HL]: Expansion, Question, [768] (4.2.16) Learning, Motion to Take Note, 2R, [768] (29.1.16) 1553-78.
    [Show full text]