Year BP Kurile Lake Caldera-Forming Eruption, Kamchatka, Russia: Stratigraphy and Field Relationships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Year BP Kurile Lake Caldera-Forming Eruption, Kamchatka, Russia: Stratigraphy and Field Relationships Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 136 (2004) 199–222 www.elsevier.com/locate/jvolgeores The 7600 (14C) year BP Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption, Kamchatka, Russia: stratigraphy and field relationships V.V. Ponomarevaa,*, P.R. Kyleb, I.V. Melekestseva, P.G. Rinkleffb, O.V. Dirksena, L.D. Sulerzhitskyc, N.E. Zaretskaiac, R. Rourkeb a Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Piip Blvd. 9, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683006, Russia b Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801-4796, USA c Geological Institute, Pyzhevsky per. 7, Moscow 119017, Russia Abstract The 7600 14C-year-old Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption (KO) in southern Kamchatka, Russia, produced a 7-km-wide caldera now mostly filled by the Kurile Lake. The KO eruption has a conservatively estimated tephra volume of 140–170 km3 making it the largest Holocene eruption in the Kurile–Kamchatka volcanic arc and ranking it among the Earth’s largest Holocene explosive eruptions. The eruptive sequence consists of three main units: (I) initial phreatoplinian deposits; (II) plinian fall deposits, and (III) a voluminous and extensive ignimbrite sheet and accompanying surge beds and co-ignimbrite fallout. The KO fall tephra was dispersed over an area of >3 million km2, mostly in a northwest direction. It is a valuable stratigraphic marker for southern Kamchatka, the Sea of Okhotsk, and a large part of the Asia mainland, where it has been identified as a f 6 to 0.1 cm thick layer in terrestrial and lake sediments, 1000–1700 km from source. The ignimbrite, which constitutes a significant volume of the KO deposits, extends to the Sea of Okhotsk and the Pacific Ocean on either side of the peninsula, a distance of over 50 km from source. Fine co-ignimbrite ash was likely formed when the ignimbrite entered the sea and could account for the wide dispersal of the KO fall unit. Individual pumice clasts from the fall and surge deposits range from dacite to rhyolite, whereas pumice and scoria clasts in the ignimbrite range from basaltic andesite to rhyolite. Ignimbrite exposed west and south of the caldera is dominantly rhyolite, whereas north, east and southeast of the caldera it has a strong vertical compositional zonation from rhyolite at the base to basaltic andesite in the middle, and back to rhyolite at the top. Following the KO eruption, Iliinsky volcano formed within the northeastern part of the caldera producing basalt to dacite lavas and pyroclastic rocks compositionally related to the KO erupted products. Other post-caldera features include several extrusive domes, which form islands in Kurile Lake, submerged cinder cones and the huge silicic extrusive massif of Dikii Greben’ volcano. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: caldera; explosive eruption; ignimbrite; Kamchatka; Kurile Lake; Holocene 1. Introduction Arc volcanoes pose a significant hazard to society * Corresponding author. Tel.: + 7-415-22-59194; fax: +7-415- because of their number, explosiveness and frequency 22-59130. of eruptions. By documenting and dating past erup- E-mail address: [email protected] (V.V. Ponomareva). tions, and estimating their size and eruptive volumes, 0377-0273/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.05.013 200 V.V. Ponomareva et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 136 (2004) 199–222 we can contribute to the global paleovolcanic record eruption would have devastated the southern Kam- and provide a framework for further volcanological chatka Peninsula and is likely to have had a short-term and petrologic studies. impact on the global climate. We describe the stratig- Five large (VEI = 5–7) explosive caldera-forming raphy, distribution, age, composition and volume of eruptions took place on the Kamchatka Peninsula the deposits from the eruption and reconstruct the during the Holocene. Three occurred at the Ksudach eruptive sequence. New data allow us to re-consider volcanic massif and the other two resulted in the the extent of tephra dispersal and discuss the charac- formation of the Karymsky and Kurile Lake calderas teristic features of the tephra that are helpful for its (Braitseva et al., 1995, 1997a,b).SomeKsudach identification and correlation in distal sites. Petrologic eruptions have been described (Braitseva et al., evolution of the eruption will be considered in detail 1996; Bursik et al., 1993; Melekestsev et al., 1996; in a separate paper (Kyle et al., in preparation). Volynets et al., 1999), but the larger Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption has only received brief men- tion (Piip, 1947; Melekestsev et al., 1974; Braitseva et 2. Geologic background and previous studies al., 1995, 1997a,b). Recent field work in the Kurile Lake area has collected new data on the deposits and Kurile Lake is located at the southern end of the allows us to reconstruct the eruptive history. Here we Kamchatka Peninsula. The lake is 81 m above sea document the largest Holocene explosive eruption on level and has an area of 76 km2. It drains into the the Kamchatka Peninsula, which resulted in the for- Ozernaya River, which flows to the Sea of Okhotsk mation of the Kurile Lake caldera and produced an (Figs. 1 and 2). The lake and surrounds is a wilderness extensive ignimbrite deposit which has characteristics area and the rugged volcanic landscape is mostly resembling the Taupo ignimbrite (Wilson, 1985). The covered with bush and forest vegetation. In mid- Fig. 1. View looking southwest of Kurile Lake and Iliinsky volcano from Zheltovsky volcano. Iliinsky volcano and the dissected surface of the Kurile Lake caldera ignimbrite are in the foreground. Iliinsky is located in a crater of the Late Pleistocene pre-Iliinsky volcano (the rim of the crater can be seen at the break of slope to the left of Iliinsky and can be traced around before being buried by a young Iliinsky andesite lava flow). The large fresh crater on the center–left slope of Iliinsky formed in 1901 by a phreatic eruption. Kurile Lake is behind and to the right of Iliinsky. Dikii Greben’ extrusive massif is on the right just across the Kurile Lake. The Holocene and Late Pleistocene Kambalny and Kosheleva volcanoes are in the background. Photo by Nikolai Smelov. V.V. Ponomareva et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 136 (2004) 199–222 201 Fig. 2. Location map for the Kurile Lake region, South Kamchatka, and distribution of the basal unit (unit I) of the Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption deposits. Dashed line a–b south of the lake marks the profile shown in Fig. 7. Pleistocene time, the area is believed to be an island al., 1997). The 7-km-wide Kurile Lake caldera separated from the Kamchatka Peninsula by a strait belongs to the subduction-related Eastern volcanic (Melekestsev et al., 1974). belt of Kamchatka. The belt lies f 200 km inboard Volcanism on the Kamchatka Peninsula results of the Kurile–Kamchatka trench and 100 km above from subduction of the Pacific plate underneath the the Wadati–Benioff zone (Gorbatov et al., 1997). Okhotsk and North American plates at a rate of Volcanic eruptions in southern Kamchatka have f 8 cm/year (Geist and Scholl, 1994; Gorbatov et been highly explosive. Four of the six Holocene 202 V.V. Ponomareva et al. / Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 136 (2004) 199–222 eruptions in Kamchatka with tephra volumes greater Widespread outcrops of white pumice around Kur- than 10 km3 (Braitseva et al., 1997a) took place in ile Lake, some more than 150 m high, caught the southern Kamchatka. The Kurile Lake caldera is 50 attention of native settlers who called them ‘‘Kutkh’s km south of the Ksudach caldera complex which boats’’ (Kutkh was a hero of local folklore), since the experienced two Late Pleistocene and three Holo- shape of the vertical ribs, formed by erosion and cene caldera-forming eruptions (Melekestsev et al., possibly fumarolic induration, resembled huge over- 1996). Kurile Lake is surrounded by the Late turned boats put out to dry (Fig. 3D,E). Piip (1947) Pleistocene–Holocene volcanoes Zheltovsky, Iliin- began reconnaissance volcanological studies in South sky, Dikii Greben’, Kosheleva, and Kambalny which Kamchatka and suggested that the eruption of pumice are located only 12–18 km from one another (Figs. was associated with a tectonic depression centered 1 and 2). Recent eruptions include Zheltovsky in within Kurile Lake. This idea was supported by 1923, Illinsky in 1901, Kosheleva, and probably, Braitseva et al. (1965), who determined the pumice Kambalny, in the 17th century (Novograblenov, was a pyroclastic flow deposit erupted during the 1932). Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption. Some research- The Holocene and Pleistocene volcanic deposits ers attributed the pumice deposits in different valleys rest on Pliocene to Miocene volcanic and sedimen- to individual fissure vents and discounted the exis- tary rocks (Florensky and Bazanova, 1991). Pleisto- tence of a caldera (e.g. Masurenkov, 1980). Radiocar- cene volcanism included the formation of lava bon dates for the Kurile Lake caldera deposits, which plateaus, several calderas, and several stratovolca- are discussed in detail below, give an age of about noes including the pre-Iliinsky somma-volcano, 7600 years BP (Zaretskaia et al., 2001). Braitseva et which encloses modern Iliinsky (Figs. 1 and 2). al. (1997b) recognized widespread tephra fall from the The existence of a Late Pleistocene caldera within Kurile Lake eruption over much of southern Kam- a larger mid-Pleistocene Pauzhetka caldera has been chatka, and Melekestsev et al. (1991) identified it in proposed but the existence of this caldera is still the Magadan region on mainland Asia. These findings being debated (Melekestsev et al., 1974, 1991).At showed that the Kurile Lake caldera-forming eruption least two partly superimposed caldera scarps of (coded KO) was the largest Holocene eruption in Pleistocene age can be identified near the lake Kamchatka and the most important in ‘‘a century’’ (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Structural Positions of High Temperature Hydrothermal Systems of Kamchatka
    REGIONAL STRUCTURAL POSITIONS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEMS OF KAMCHATKA Vladimir Leonov Institute of Volcanology, Far East Division, Russian Academy of Sciences 9 Piip Avenue, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683006, Russia; -mail: [email protected] Key Words: hydrothermal system, volcanic belt, structure, The geological structure of most hydrothermal systems in basement, trough, fault, Kamchatka Kamchatka has been studied in detail. There are many works containing detailed geological maps, geothermal area ABSTRACT sections, data on the deep structure received on the basis of geophysical and drilling works and the like. (Vakin et al., Structural conditions of locations with high-temperature 1970; Volcanism, the Hydrothermal Process and Ore- hydrothermal systems in Kamchatka are analyzed herein. It is formation, 1974; Hydrothermal Systems…, 1976; Belousov, shown that hydrothermal systems are located within the 1978; Leonov, 1989; Kiryukhin et al., 1991; etc.). boundary of Pliocene-Quaternary volcanic belts and confined to areas where these belts are superimposed on deep troughs From the very beginning of hydrothermal activity study a of the basement. The main structural elements determining the close connection with outcrops of rocks of acid composition position of high-temperature hydrothermal systems are faults has been noted: extrusions of dacites, rhyolites, fields with that bound such troughs. These faults are rarely exposed on widespread pumices and ignimbrites. It was noted that many the surface, they are usually overlapped with a powerful hydrothermal systems are located within the boundary of sedimentary -volcanogene cover, but systems of recent volcanic-tectonic depressions, calderas and grabens. The (mainly late Pleistocene-Holocene) fractures stretching along connection between high-temperature hydrothermal systems the abyssal boundary are formed above them in this cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes
    Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes MAY 1, 2008 Cover: A plume of volcanic gas and water vapor rises above the summit crater and growing lava dome at Augustine Volcano in southern Cook Inlet. A mantle of light brown ash discolors the snow on the upper flanks. View is towards the southwest. Photograph taken by C. Read, U.S. Geological Survey, January 24, 2006. Alaska Volcano Observatory database image from http://www.avo.alaska.edu/image.php?id=7051. Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes May 1, 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Integrated Response to Volcanic Ash ....................................................................... 3 1.2 Data Collection and Processing ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Information Management and Coordination .............................................................. 4 1.4 Distribution and Dissemination.................................................................................. 5 2.0 Responsibilities of the Participating Agencies ........................................................... 5 2.1 ALASKA DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (DHS&EM) .............................................................................. 5 2.2 ALASKA VOLCANO OBSERVATORY (AVO)........................................................... 6 2.2.1 Organization.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopes \&Amp\; Geochemistry: Tools for Geothermal Reservoir
    E3S Web of Conferences 98, 08013 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199808013 WRI-16 Isotopes & Geochemistry: Tools For Geothermal Reservoir Characterization (Kamchatka Examples) Alexey Kiryukhin1,*, Pavel Voronin1, Nikita Zhuravlev1, Andrey Polyakov1, Tatiana Rychkova1, Vasily Lavrushin2, Elena Kartasheva1, Natalia Asaulova3, Larisa Vorozheikina3, and Ivan Chernev4 1Institute of Volcanology & Seismology FEB RAS, Piip 9, Petropavlovsk-Kamch., 683006, Russia 2Geological Institute RAS, Pyzhevsky 7, Moscow 119017, Russia 3Teplo Zemli JSC, Vilyuchinskaya 6, Thermalny, 684000, Russia 4Geotherm JSC, Ac. Koroleva 60, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683980, Russia Abstract. The thermal, hydrogeological, and chemical processes affecting Kamchatka geothermal reservoirs were studied by using isotope and geochemistry data: (1) The Geysers Valley hydrothermal reservoirs; (2) The Paratunsky low temperature reservoirs; (3) The North-Koryaksky hydrothermal system; (4) The Mutnovsky high temperature geothermal reservoir; (5) The Pauzhetsky geothermal reservoir. In most cases water isotope in combination with Cl- transient data are found to be useful tool to estimate reservoirs natural and disturbed by exploitation recharge conditions, isotopes of carbon-13 (in CO2) data are pointed either active magmatic recharge took place, while SiO2 and Na-K geothermometers shows opposite time transient trends (Paratunsky, Geysers Valley) suggest that it is necessary to use more complicated geochemical systems of water/mineral equilibria. 1 Introduction Active pore space limitation mass transport velocities are typically greater than heat transport velocities. That is a fundamental reason why changes in the isotope and chemistry parameters of geofluids are faster than changes in the heat properties of producing geothermal reservoirs, which makes them pre-cursors to production parameter changes. In cases of inactive to rock chemical species, they can be used as tracers of fluid flow and boundary condition estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Tour to Kuril Lake-Caldera of Volcano Ksudach-Khodutkinskye Hot Springs (Tour 2)
    HELICOPTER TOUR TO VALLEY OF GEYSERS-CALDERA OF VOLCANO UZON-NALYCHEVO VALLEY (TOUR 1) Period – all the year Transportation – helicopter Tour time – 6 hours Flight time – approximately 2 hours 15 minutes The famous Valley of Geysers is a canyon which has one of the biggest geyser area in the world. It is hidden in a hard access gorge of the Kronotsky Nature Reserve. It is unrivalled in beauty, landscape grandeur and number of springs throwing out fountains of hot water and steam. Gushing geysers, raging mud cauldrons, a turquoise lake, hot water and steam jets flowing down the slopes together with the lush greenery of grass and trees create a really fantastic sight. Not far from the Valley of Geysers there is one more unique and impressive place - Uzon caldera. It is a giant cavity with the dimensions 9×12 km, resulting from destruction of the ancient volcano, having an intensive hydrothermal activity on the bottom. There are a lot of boiling and raging craters, numerous mud cauldrons and small volcanoes, yellow fumaroles areas, steamy grounds where the steam and hot water come out from the earth. The peculiarity of this place is the crater-like holes 25-40 m deep and in diameter 25-150 m, in which hot lakes of odd colours are situated. ROUTE 11.00-12.00 - Flight from heliport of Yelizovo city to the Valley of Geysers. Flying around Karymskiy and Malyi Semyachik active volcanoes. 12.00-13.30 - Excursion to the Valley of Geysers. 13.30-13.40 - Flying to the Uzon caldera. 13.40-14.30 - Excursion in the caldera of Uzon volcano.
    [Show full text]
  • Source of the Great A.D. 1257 Mystery Eruption Unveiled, Samalas Volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia
    Source of the great A.D. 1257 mystery eruption unveiled, Samalas volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia Franck Lavignea,1, Jean-Philippe Degeaia,b, Jean-Christophe Komorowskic, Sébastien Guilletd, Vincent Roberta, Pierre Lahittee, Clive Oppenheimerf, Markus Stoffeld,g, Céline M. Vidalc, Suronoh, Indyo Pratomoi, Patrick Wassmera,j, Irka Hajdask, Danang Sri Hadmokol, and Edouard de Belizala aUniversité Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Département de Géographie, and Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8591, 92195 Meudon, France; bUniversité Montpellier 3 Paul Valéry and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5140, 34970 Lattes, France; cInstitut de Physique du Globe, Equipe Géologie des Systèmes Volcaniques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7654, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, 75238 Paris Cedex 05, France; dInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; eDépartement des Sciences de la Terre (IDES), Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; fDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom; gDepartment of Earth Sciences, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland; hCenter for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; iGeological Museum, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; jFaculté de Géographie et d’Aménagement, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; kLaboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland; and lFaculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Geography, Gadjah Mada University, Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Edited by Ikuo Kushiro, University of Tokyo, Tsukuba, Japan, and approved September 4, 2013 (received for review April 21, 2013) Polar ice core records attest to a colossal volcanic eruption that northern hemisphere in A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Arc of Kamchatka: a Province with High-␦18O Magma Sources and Large-Scale 18O/16O Depletion of the Upper Crust
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 841–865, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/04 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.009 Volcanic arc of Kamchatka: a province with high-␦18O magma sources and large-scale 18O/16O depletion of the upper crust 1, 2 3 1 ILYA N. BINDEMAN, *VERA V. PONOMAREVA, JOHN C. BAILEY, and JOHN W. VALLEY 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 2Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia 3Geologisk Institut, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Received March 20, 2003; accepted in revised form July 16, 2003) Abstract—We present the results of a regional study of oxygen and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of Pleistocene to Recent arc volcanism in the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuriles, with emphasis on the largest caldera- forming centers. The ␦18O values of phenocrysts, in combination with numerical crystallization modeling (MELTS) and experimental fractionation factors, are used to derive best estimates of primary values for ␦18O(magma). Magmatic ␦18O values span 3.5‰ and are correlated with whole-rock Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes and major elements. Our data show that Kamchatka is a region of isotopic diversity with high-␦18O basaltic magmas (sampling mantle to lower crustal high-␦18O sources), and low-␦18O silicic volcanism (sampling low-␦18O upper crust). Among one hundred Holocene and Late Pleistocene eruptive units from 23 volcanic centers, one half represents low-␦18O magmas (ϩ4 to 5‰). Most low-␦ 18O magmas are voluminous silicic ignimbrites related to large Ͼ10 km3 caldera-forming eruptions and subsequent intracaldera lavas and domes: Holocene multi-caldera Ksudach volcano, Karymsky and Kurile Lake-Iliinsky calderas, and Late Pleistocene Maly Semyachik, Akademy Nauk, and Uzon calderas.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Rhyolite Lava Dome Formation
    Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Giant rhyolite lava dome formation after 7.3 ka supereruption at Kikai Title caldera, SW Japan Tatsumi, Yoshiyuki / Suzuki-Kamata, Keiko / Matsuno, Tetsuo / Ichihara, Hiroshi / Seama, Nobukazu / Kiyosugi, Koji / Nakaoka, Reina / 著者 Nakahigashi, Kazuo / Takizawa, Hideaki / Hayashi, Kazuki / Chiba, Author(s) Tatsuro / Shimizu, Satoshi / Sano, Mamoru / Iwamaru, Hikaru / Morozumi, Haruhisa / Sugioka, Hiroko / Yamamoto, Yojiro 掲載誌・巻号・ページ Scientific Reports,8:2753 Citation 刊行日 2018-02-09 Issue date 資源タイプ Journal Article / 学術雑誌論文 Resource Type 版区分 publisher Resource Version © The Author(s) 2018 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party 権利 material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons Rights license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21066-w JaLCDOI URL http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/handle_kernel/90004609
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Hazards As Components of Complex Systems: the Case of Japan
    Volume 13 | Issue 33 | Number 6 | Article ID 4359 | Aug 17, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Volcanic Hazards as Components of Complex Systems: The Case of Japan Gregory Smits The past year or so has been a time of the earth’s crust suggested Mt. Fuji is more particularly vigorous volcanic activity in Japan, likely to erupt owing to effects from the 2011 or at least activity that has intruded into public Tōhoku earthquake.3 Well publicized by a press awareness. Perhaps most dramatic was the release on the eve of its publication, mass deadly eruption of Mt. Ontake on September media around the world have reported this 27, 2014, whose 57 fatalities were the first finding, along with speculation regarding volcano-related deaths in Japan since 1991. On possible connections between earthquakes and May 29, 2015, Mt. Shindake, off the southern volcanic eruptions. tip of Kyushu, erupted violently, forcing the evacuation of the island of Kuchinoerabu. That As of June 30, 2015, the Japan Meteorological same day, Sakurajima, located just north in Agency (JMA) designated ten volcanoes in or Kagoshima Bay, erupted more forcefully than near the main Japanese islands as warranting usual. Sakurajima has been erupting in some levels of warning ranging from Mt. Shindake’s fashion almost continuously since 1955, but Level 5 (“Evacuate”), to Level 2 (“Do not since 2006, its activity has become relatively approach the crater”) in seven cases. more vigorous. Indeed, a May 30 Asahi shinbun Sakurajima is at Level 3 (“Do not approach the article characterized these eruptions as “the volcano”), as is Hakoneyama, located near Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2009 by Richard Vanderhoek. All Rights Reserved
    © 2009 by Richard VanderHoek. All rights reserved. THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL BARRIERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURAL BOUNDARIES DURING THE LATER HOLOCENE OF THE CENTRAL ALASKA PENINSULA BY RICHARD VANDERHOEK DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor R. Barry Lewis, Chair Professor Stanley H. Ambrose Professor Thomas E. Emerson Professor William B. Workman, University of Alaska ABSTRACT This study assesses the capability of very large volcanic eruptions to effect widespread ecological and cultural change. It focuses on the proximal and distal effects of the Aniakchak volcanic eruption that took place approximately 3400 rcy BP on the central Alaskan Peninsula. The research is based on archaeological and ecological data from the Alaska Peninsula, as well as literature reviews dealing with the ecological and cultural effects of very large volcanic eruptions, volcanic soils and revegetation of volcanic landscapes, and northern vegetation and wildlife. Analysis of the Aniakchak pollen and soil data show that the pyroclastic flow from the 3400 rcy BP eruption caused a 2500 km² zone of very low productivity on the Alaska Peninsula. This "Dead Zone" on the central Alaska Peninsula lasted for over 1000 years. Drawing on these data and the results of archaeological excavations and surveys throughout the Alaska Peninsula, this dissertation examines the thesis that the Aniakchak 3400 rcy BP eruption created a massive ecological barrier to human interaction and was a major factor in the separate development of modern Eskimo and Aleut populations and their distinctive cultural traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dr. Nikita Mironov Curriculum Vitae
    Dr. Nikita Mironov Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical chemistry of Russian Academy of Science, GEOKHI RAS, Laboratory of geochemistry of magmatic and metamorphic rocks, Russia, 119991, Moscow, Kosygin str., 19 Tel. +7-495-939 7062; Fax +7-495-938 2054 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL: Name: Nikita Mironov Leonardovich Born: September 23, 1977 in Moscow, Russia Nationality: Russian Family: Married, 2 children (son, 2005 and daughter, 2011) EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC DEGREES: 1984-1994 Elementary and intermediate schools, Moscow 1994-1999 Diploma (MSc eq.) in geochemistry (with honours), Moscow State University 2001-2009 Cand. Sci (PhD eq.) in geochemistry, Vernadsky Institute, Moscow, Russia. Dissertation “The origin and evolution of Kliuchevskoi volcano magmas from study of melt inclusions in olivine”, supervisor M.V. Portnyagin PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS: 1999-2002 Post graduated student at M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geological Department, Chair of Petrology, Teaching experience in petrography 2001-2008 Junior Researcher at the V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Science (GEOKHI RAS) in Moscow (Russia) 2008-2011 Research Assistant at GEOKHI RAS 2002-2013 Several one-two months’ research visits at GEOMAR, Kiel and at the Institute of Mineralogy, Hannover, Germany Since 2011 Senior Researcher at the V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (GEOKHI) in Moscow (Russia) . SCIENTIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES: - Reviews for publications and English scientific editing of Geochemistry International ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES: - Vice-chairman of young scientists’ council of Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry SCIENTIFIC INTERESTS: 1. Origin and evolution of magmas at active continental margins, island arcs and ocean islands 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory
    The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys . The Alaska Volcano Observtory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Southeast flank of Augustine Volcano showing summit steaming, superheated fumarole jet, and ash dusting on snow. View is toward the northwest with Iniskin Bay in the distance. Photograph taken by Chris Waythomas, AVO/USGS, December 20, 2005. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory By R.G. McGimsey, C.A. Neal, J.P. Dixon, U.S. Geological Survey, and Sergey Ushakov, Institute of Volcanology and Seismology The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophuysical Surveys. The Alaska Volcano Observatory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fire and Brimstone: How Volcanoes Work
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-64112-8 - Eruptions that Shook the World Clive Oppenheimer Excerpt More information 1 Fire and brimstone: how volcanoes work Some volcanos are in a state of incessant eruption; some, on the contrary, remain for centuries in a condition of total outward inertness, and return again to the same state of apparent extinction after a single vivid eruption of short duration; while others exhibit an infinite variety of phases intermediate between the extreme of vivacity and sluggishness. G. P. Scrope, Volcanos (1862) [1] The Earth is cooling down! This has nothing to do with contem- porary global warming of the atmosphere and surface. I refer instead to the Earths interior the source of the molten rocks erupted by volcanoes throughout the planets 4.567 billion year history. Aeons before the continents drifted to anything like their familiar positions, and as early as 3.34 billion years ago, parts of the Earth were already colonised by primitive bacterial life forms. At this time, volcanoes erupted lavas with a much higher content of an abundant green min- eral called olivine than found in most modern volcanic rocks. This testifies to much higher eruption temperatures for the ancient lavas compared with present-day eruptions from Mt Etna or the Hawaiian volcanoes. In turn, it reveals that the Earths largest internal shell, the olivine-rich mantle, which comprises about 84% of the Earths volume, used to be considerably hotter, too (anywhere between 100 and 500 °C depending on whom you believe). While the Earth changes irreversibly through time, it also exhibits behavioural cycles acted out on vastly different timescales, such as the amalgamation and break-up of super- continents; the clockwork advance and retreat of ice ages steered by oscillations in the Earths axis of rotation and orbit around the Sun; the seasons; and the tides.
    [Show full text]