"/X May 6, 1994

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surface Finishing Technology Selection and Work Team Development Study in a Product Conversion by John Michael Eustis B.S., Materials Engineering Brown University, 1989 Submitted to the MIT Sloan School of Management and the Department of Materials Science & Engineering in Partial Fulfillmentof the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Materials Science & Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 1994 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994. All rights reserved. / I ' CV -y - I- Signature of Author - I - __ "/x May 6, 1994 Certified by Stuart B. Brown, Richard P. Simmons Associate Professor of Materials Manufacturing Thesis Supervisor Certified by Jnice A. Klein, Visiting Associate Professor of Management Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Carl V. Thompsor II, Professor of Electronic Materials Chair, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students Science4 - !tvC a-~~~~'s 1l i -' 1 AUG 18 1994 .,-3p1 r";i'' 2 Surface Finishing Technology Selection and Work Team Development Study in a Product Conversion by John Michael Eustis Submitted to the MIT Sloan School of Management and the Department of Materials Science & Engineering on May 6, 1994 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Materials Science & Engineering Abstract Intense research efforts have been undertaken in the past decade to try to understand what changes are necessary for U.S. companies to regain their competitive edge. Intelligent use of new technologies and implementation of high-performance work systems are just two of the many recommendations that have come out of these research efforts. This thesis is the result of a six and a half month study of both of these issues at one particular U.S. manufacturing company. In an effort to reduce the production costs of surgical instruments, an investigation of automated surface finishing technologies was performed using a structured methodology. Several different technologies were researched including robotic finishing, several forms of mass finishing, and electrochemical finishing. Once the feasible technologies were identified, technical cost models were developed for each alternative and recommendations for capital expenditure were made. Several technologies proved to be attractive and would provide substantial cost savings compared with manual finishing. Concurrently, a work team development study was performed in one individual production cell. The study included a workplace analysis of the production cell and the initial stages of work redesign based on the small business team (SBT) job model conceived by Janice Klein (1993). The SBT model is a form of self-managed work team based, in part, on sociotechnical systems theory. Commitment at all levels of the organization and an understanding of the corporate culture were identified as critical success factors for a work design project. Although work team development can be a lengthy process, substantial improvements in productivity can be achieved by implementing high performance work systems such as SBT's. Thesis Supervisors: Stuart B. Brown, Richard P. SimmonsAssociate Professor of Materials Manufacturing Janice A. Klein, Visiting Associate Professor of Management Science 3 4 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my family and friends for their support during my internship and during my struggle to write this thesis. I would especially like to thank my parents for everything they have done for me. I would not be at this point in my life without them. I also want to thank Beth for making sure I actually finished this thesis. I would like to thank all of the people at Codman & Shurtleff who helped me during the internship. A special thanks to Chris Sullivan, Jose Almeida, and the rest of the staff in New Bedford who provided me with an opportunity to experience the turbulent and exciting world of manufacturing and expanded my knowledge of Portuguese food and culture. I would like to thank my thesis advisors, Janice Klein and Stuart Brown, for their wisdom and encouragement which enabled me to satisfy the multiple customers of this research. I would also like to acknowledge the Leaders for Manufacturing Program for its support of this work. 5 6 Table of Contents Chapter One - Introduction .................. ...................................................... 9 Description of the plant environment...................................................... 9 Motivation for automated surface finishing technology investigation .................. 11 Motivation for work team development study .................................................... 12 Chapter Two - Technology Selection Methodology ............................................. ......14 Chapter Three - Automated Surface Finishing Technologies ................................... 27 Robotic Finishing .............................................................................................. 28 Mass Finishing ...................................................... 31 Tumble Barrel Finishing ...................................................... 36 Vibratory Finishing ............................................................................... 37 Spindle Finishing ...................................................... 38 Centrifugal Disc Finishing . ..................................................... 39 Centrifugal Barrel Finishing .................................................................... 40 Electropolishing ................................................................................................. 45 Burlytic Processing ...................................................... 48 Chapter Four - Technical Cost Modeling ................................................................... 52 Variable Costs ...................................................... 53 Fixed Costs .................................................................. 54 Technical Cost Models for Surface Finishing Technologies ................................ 60 M odel Results ...................................................... 71 Sensitivity Analysis ...................................................... 72 Chapter Five - Conclusions & Recommendations ..................................................... 74 Recommendations for Investment ...................................................... 75 Future Research .............................................................. 77 Chapter Six - The Evolution of W ork Design ......................................................... 80 Taylorism ...................................................... 80 Sociotechnical Systems ...................................................................................... 81 Internal M otivation and Job Satisfaction ...................................................... 83 Toyota Production System............................................................................... 84 Small Business Teams ................................................................. 85 7 Chapter Seven - Small Business Team Design Methodology . ............................ 89 Chapter Eight - Case Study: Rongeur Cell ............................................................. 107 The Initial Meetings .................... ......... ........................................ 107 Skill Identification Meetings ........................................................ 110 Levels of Expertise ........................................................ 111 Training Requirements ....................................................................... 112 Initial Design Steps and the Need for Future Work........................................... 113 Chapter Nine - Small Business Team Conclusions .................................................. 117 Lessons Learned ........................................................ 117 General Conclusions About Small Business Teams ........................................... 120 Appendix A - Technical Cost Models for Surface Finishing Technologies ............. 123 Appendix B - SBT Data Spreadsheets for Rongeur Cell ......................................... 148 Bibliography ...................... .......... .............................................................................172 8 Chapter One Introduction Many studies have been written about the steady erosion of U.S. manufacturing competitiveness since the end of World War II. Couple this with the rise of many new fierce competitors in many different nations and you might say that U.S. manufacturing companies are facing a crisis. If the U.S. is to become a world-class manufacturing nation, companies must be able to produce in small lots, customizing products to increasing demands. Intense research efforts have been undertaken in the past decade to try to understand what changes are necessary for U.S. companies to regain their competitive edge. Intelligent use of new technologies and implementation of high-performance work systems are just two of the many recommendations that have come out of these research efforts. This thesis is the result of a six and a half month study of both of these issues at one particular U.S. manufacturing company. This thesis is essentially written in two separate pieces. Chapters Two through Five are devoted to a discussion of automated surface finishing technology selection and Chapters Six through Nine document a work team development study. The remainder of the introduction is dedicated to
Recommended publications
  • Manufacturing Glossary
    MANUFACTURING GLOSSARY Aging – A change in the properties of certain metals and alloys that occurs at ambient or moderately elevated temperatures after a hot-working operation or a heat-treatment (quench aging in ferrous alloys, natural or artificial aging in ferrous and nonferrous alloys) or after a cold-working operation (strain aging). The change in properties is often, but not always, due to a phase change (precipitation), but never involves a change in chemical composition of the metal or alloy. Abrasive – Garnet, emery, carborundum, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, or other material in various grit sizes used for grinding, lapping, polishing, honing, pressure blasting, and other operations. Each abrasive particle acts like a tiny, single-point tool that cuts a small chip; with hundreds of thousands of points doing so, high metal-removal rates are possible while providing a good finish. Abrasive Band – Diamond- or other abrasive-coated endless band fitted to a special band machine for machining hard-to-cut materials. Abrasive Belt – Abrasive-coated belt used for production finishing, deburring, and similar functions.See coated abrasive. Abrasive Cutoff Disc – Blade-like disc with abrasive particles that parts stock in a slicing motion. Abrasive Cutoff Machine, Saw – Machine that uses blade-like discs impregnated with abrasive particles to cut/part stock. See saw, sawing machine. Abrasive Flow Machining – Finishing operation for holes, inaccessible areas, or restricted passages. Done by clamping the part in a fixture, then extruding semisolid abrasive media through the passage. Often, multiple parts are loaded into a single fixture and finished simultaneously. Abrasive Machining – Various grinding, honing, lapping, and polishing operations that utilize abrasive particles to impart new shapes, improve finishes, and part stock by removing metal or other material.See grinding.
    [Show full text]
  • Enghandbook.Pdf
    785.392.3017 FAX 785.392.2845 Box 232, Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expy Minneapolis, KS 67467 ENGINEERING HANDBOOK TECHNICAL INFORMATION STEELMAKING Basic descriptions of making carbon, alloy, stainless, and tool steel p. 4. METALS & ALLOYS Carbon grades, types, and numbering systems; glossary p. 13. Identification factors and composition standards p. 27. CHEMICAL CONTENT This document and the information contained herein is not Quenching, hardening, and other thermal modifications p. 30. HEAT TREATMENT a design standard, design guide or otherwise, but is here TESTING THE HARDNESS OF METALS Types and comparisons; glossary p. 34. solely for the convenience of our customers. For more Comparisons of ductility, stresses; glossary p.41. design assistance MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METAL contact our plant or consult the Machinery G.L. Huyett’s distinct capabilities; glossary p. 53. Handbook, published MANUFACTURING PROCESSES by Industrial Press Inc., New York. COATING, PLATING & THE COLORING OF METALS Finishes p. 81. CONVERSION CHARTS Imperial and metric p. 84. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Steelmaking 4 Metals and Alloys 13 Designations for Chemical Content 27 Designations for Heat Treatment 30 Testing the Hardness of Metals 34 Mechanical Properties of Metal 41 Manufacturing Processes 53 Manufacturing Glossary 57 Conversion Coating, Plating, and the Coloring of Metals 81 Conversion Charts 84 Links and Related Sites 89 Index 90 Box 232 • Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expressway • Minneapolis, Kansas 67467 785-392-3017 • Fax 785-392-2845 • [email protected] • www.huyett.com INTRODUCTION & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was created based on research and experience of Huyett staff. Invaluable technical information, including statistical data contained in the tables, is from the 26th Edition Machinery Handbook, copyrighted and published in 2000 by Industrial Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Surface Finishing Action and Resulting Surfaces Produced by the Cascade Finishing Process Peter Charles Brust Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1997 An investigation of the surface finishing action and resulting surfaces produced by the Cascade Finishing process Peter Charles Brust Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons, and the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Brust, Peter Charles, "An investigation of the surface finishing action and resulting surfaces produced by the Cascade Finishing process " (1997). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 11777. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/11777 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UME films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter &ce, while others may be from ai^ type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMl a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 438, App. B
    Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 438, App. B MISCELLANEOUS METAL PRODUCTS Miscellaneous Fabricated Wire Products Miscellaneous Metal Work Miscellaneous Repair Shops & Related Services Miscellaneous Transportation Equipment APPENDIX B TO PART 438—OILY (1) Alkaline cleaning is performed to re- OPERATIONS DEFINITIONS move foreign contaminants from parts. This operation usually is done prior to finishing NOTE: The definitions in this appendix (e.g., electroplating). shall not be used to differentiate between the (2) Emulsion cleaning is an alkaline clean- six ‘‘core’’ metal finishing operations (i.e., ing operation that uses either complex Electroplating, Electroless Plating, Anod- chemical enzymes or common organic sol- izing, Coating (chromating, phosphating, and vents (e.g., kerosene, mineral oil, glycols, coloring), Chemical Etching and Milling, and and benzene) dispersed in water with the aid Printed Circuit Board Manufacture) and of an emulsifying agent. The pH of the sol- forty ‘‘ancillary’’ process operations listed at vent usually is between 7 and 9, and, depend- 40 CFR 433.10(a). ing on the solvent used, cleaning is per- Abrasive Blasting involves removing surface formed at temperatures from room tempera- ° ° film from a part by using abrasive directed ture to 82 C (180 F). This operation often is at high velocity against the part. Abrasive used as a replacement for vapor degreasing. blasting includes bead, grit, shot, and sand Alkaline Treatment Without Cyanide is a blasting, and may be performed either dry or general term used to describe the application with water. The primary applications of wet of an alkaline solution not containing cya- nide to a metal surface to clean the metal abrasive blasting include: Removing burrs on surface or prepare the metal surface for fur- precision parts; producing satin or matte fin- ther surface finishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgings, Castings and Additive Manufactured Components Introduction
    Surface Finishing Applications we redefine Forgings, Castings and Additive Manufactured Components Introduction Why Choose Us? We’re the UK’s We’re a family run business that pride ourselves on working as a strong, unified team of specialists. leading experts in We believe in British Born in the United Kingdom, we are unique in our product design providing effective and the manufacture of our specialist machines and consumables. We’re here for you Being based in the heart of the country means we and efficient processes, have easy access to all of our clients. We have experience With five decades of experience and knowledge in and solutions, for the the finishing industry, we know what works for you. We provide options manufacturing industry. We have an impressive range of media and compounds to choose from, including one of the best polishing compounds in the market. We also provide a wide range of machinery and subcontract services to meet all of your needs. we redefine: We go the extra mile We’ll tailor our services to your needs, not the other Vibratory Finishing way round. Our service is all about you. High Energy Finishing Consumables Precision Polishing Subcontract Services 2 3 Mass Finishing What is Mass Finishing? Man x Machine x Media = M3 Mass finishing is a process that The aim of this process can vary based on the type of application, which include: Almost all manufactured components have automates the mechanical and experienced some surface improvement, high stock removal chemical finishing of various deburring to ensure that these are in an acceptable shaped parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrifugal Iso-Finishing
    MECHANICAL CENTRIFUGAL ISO-FINISHING New Challenges with 3D-Printed Parts Metal parts manufactured using various additive manufac- turing technologies present a new and entirely different set of challenges for surface finishers. Unlike with conventional manufacturing technologies, additive manufacturing does not produce parts with substantial burrs, which are by-products of cutting or metal-forming operations. Printed parts also are free of the non-isotropic machining or grinding patterns common to subtractive operations that can have negative effects on part wear and fatigue resistance. In many cases, however, 3D printing does produce unaccept- ably rough surfaces on parts, and this poses severe challenges for many mechanical surface finishing methods. Sometimes the surfaces of printed parts rival those of unfinished casted parts in terms of their initial surface roughness and positive skew. High-energy finishing methods are required to produce accept- able surface finishes with process cycle times that won’t be a Centrifugal iso-finishing can produce very refined surface source of bottlenecks or production constraints. finishes on parts in abbreviated process cycle times. (Image courtesy of Cole Mathisen, MFI.) A High-Speed, High-Energy Alternative Centrifugal iso-finishing is a high-speed and high-intensity mass finishing method in which abrasive or polishing mate- rials are caused to interact with part edges and surfaces with 10 times the surface pressure of low-energy finishing methods. What this means, in practical terms, is that it is possible to produce very refined surface finishes in abbre- viated process cycle times. It also means that parts with complex and detailed geometries can be deburred with a minimum of manual intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Accelerator Mass Finishing Stainless Steel Deburring
    CLINIC MASS FINISHING pfonline.com/experts Chemical Accelerator Mass Finishing and can we use vibratory methods Q. We manufacture hardened steel gears of all types and sizes. for our requirements?– J.K. We have a vibratory machine, but it’s been ineffective in A. You have three finishing require- smoothing our grinding lines. Can you recommend a vibra- ments: deburring, refinishing and tory or mass finishing process?– H.P. refining an existing finish. These A. We recommend a chemical accelerator process in your are all excellent applications vibratory machine. The machine must have a precise flow- for vibratory/mass finishing. through soap compound system, and coated or stainless Let’s define the two drains. Chemical accelerator finishing processes can be finishing specifications accomplished in vibratory, high-energy centrifugal disc, (2B and #8) and then spindle and drag finishing systems. The process produces discuss the vibratory super surface refinement (in the 2-to-4-Ra finish range) and process solutions. keeps edge radiusing to a minimum. Finish Specification: Chemical accelerators (oxalic acid, phosphates or citric Stainless steel finishes acids) are metered into and carried by a cutting or non- have been standardized cutting, high-density (110 to 140 lbs per cu ft), preformed by the Stainless Steel media. The accelerator chemical continuously oxidizes the Sheet Manufacturers surface of iron-based and some non-ferrous metal alloys, Association. Two of the enabling the high-density ceramic media to remove metals standard finishes are PAT WENINO / M.C. Finishing at much higher rates. The accelerator system cuts, refines, the 2B and #8. Below [email protected] and brightens surfaces within the same machine and media.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Mass
    Critical Mass By Dr. LaRoux K. Gillespie Courtesy of Rosler Metal Finishing USA A six-load, centrifugal disc mass-finishing system from Rosler features automatic loading and auto screening. Mass finishing parts at the machining center offers economic advantages. There are major economic and scheduling advantages to having a part come off a machining center complete. Most machinists think parts are finished at this point because part dimensions are correct. However, they forget that most parts must be deburred, cleaned, weighed or counted and then packaged before shipping. In most shops, that involves moving the machined parts to another part of the shop, putting them on shelves and eventually having someone perform the final operations prior to shipment. Done at the Machine Deburring parts at the machine means that they are truly ready to ship. Joe Gaser, vice president of Osborn International, Cleveland, a manufacturer of industrial brushes and surface finishing tools, noted that manufacturers would obviously like to receive payment for their parts earlier than they do. His solution: “Finish your parts at the machine instead of having them sit for days or weeks waiting to be deburred.” There are other benefits to finishing parts at a machining center. Shops find and fix problems earlier, better understand the impact of keeping burrs small, prevent mistakes from using the wrong finishing process, do not lose parts, and possibly prevent oils from drying on parts, which makes the oils difficult to remove. In addition, one person is responsible for the completed part. There are three major ways of producing a burr-free part at the machine: preventing and minimizing burrs, brush deburring during the machine cycle, and cellular manufacturing that includes deburring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leader in Small Mass Finishing About Us Raytech®
    The Leader in Small Mass Finishing About Us Raytech® WHO WE ARE Through strong and innovative engineering, Raytech is clearly the leader in today’s demanding marketplace. Raytech products are sold through specialized distributors around the world. We are confident in the superior quality of our products and would like to instill some of this confidence in the people who use them. OUR VISION Whether you make castings, stampings, or fabrications or you want to process gemstones, Raytech has a machine to suit your application. Raytech is the world’s leader in the manufacturing of small mass finishing equipment and accessories. We hold all of our equipment to the highest quality standards. In this catalog you will see Raytech’s full product offering. Each machine will deburr, finish, burnish, and perform many other applications. They are task-oriented and designed to provide another tool in your tool box. OUR MISSION Raytech’s mission is manufacturing excellence: serving industry, science, and craftsmen. OUR HISTORY Founded in 1958 in Stafford Springs, Connecticut, Raytech began as any small business does, with hard work and a dedication to supplying the highest quality products to craftsmen and hobbyists. In 1987, Raytech joined forces with Lyman Products Corporation, enhancing the manufacturing capabilities and product lines. For more than 60 years, Raytech Industries has continued this mission of manufacturing excellence. In more recent years, Raytech has enhanced this tradition by meeting the demands of industrial users and professional
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mass Finishing
    News from the surface technology Mass Finishing | Shot Blasting | Engineering | Environmental Technologies Mass Finishing Shot Blasting Rösler News Page 2 – 5 Page 6 – 9 Page 10 – 12 1 MASS FINISHING EDITORIAL Innovative consumables for optimized finishing solutions Better and more efficient mass finishing processes Not moving forward is actually a step back – Following this mantra, Rösler is constantly working to optimize its media and compounds to further improve the process stability, cost efficiency and productivity of mass finishing processes. Due to an increasing customer demand, Rösler is excited The utilization of such sophisticated dosing systems has to introduce its new “Y-range” of media - a plastic media helped improve the process controls, which has resulted type with the grinding characteristics of ceramic media, in achieving desired finishing results with less personnel. The managing directors of the Rösler Oberflächentechnik GmbH: Volker Löhnert, Stephan Rösler, Frank Möller (f.l.t.r) which does not chip and will also minimize the risk of work New developments can also be reported from the field piece damage. This is a unique and frequently requested of wastewater cleaning with recycling systems. Granular We are happy to report that our business divisions combination, a challenge in which Rösler has met head pellets are replacing the powder products which have are currently operating near capacity to meet the on with developing this new range of media. Featuring been used up to this point for flocculation and high demand we have experience throughtout a special composition, these plastic grinding media have improvement of sludge consistency. Granular flocculants 2018. Frequently, this poses challenges on the the same grinding and metal removal characteristics as have several advantages: They allow optimized handling procurement side of our business.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Process Control for Improved Surface Finish of Metal Additive Manufactured Parts of Complex Build Geometry
    inventions Article Design Process Control for Improved Surface Finish of Metal Additive Manufactured Parts of Complex Build Geometry Mikdam Jamal 1 and Michael N. Morgan 2,* ID 1 The Manufacturing Technology Centre Ltd., Ansty Park, Coventry CV7 9JU, UK; [email protected] 2 Advanced Manufacturing Technology Research Laboratory (AMTREL), Faculty of Engineering and Technology (FET), Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)151-2312590 Received: 11 August 2017; Accepted: 6 December 2017; Published: 13 December 2017 Abstract: Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is increasingly used to create complex 3D components at near net shape. However, the surface finish (SF) of the metal AM part is uneven, with surface roughness being variable over the facets of the design. Standard post-processing methods such as grinding and linishing often meet with major challenges in finishing parts of complex shape. This paper reports on research that demonstrated that mass finishing (MF) processes are able to deliver high-quality surface finishes (Ra and Sa) on AM-generated parts of a relatively complex geometry (both internal features and external facets) under select conditions. Four processes were studied in this work: stream finishing, high-energy (HE) centrifuge, drag finishing and disc finishing. Optimisation of the drag finishing process was then studied using a structured design of experiments (DOE). The effects of a range of finishing parameters were evaluated and optimal parameters and conditions were determined. The study established that the proposed method can be successfully applied in drag finishing to optimise the surface roughness in an industrial application and that it is an economical way of obtaining the maximum amount of information in a short period of time with a small number of tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Finishing
    Mass Finishing 1 Rösler provides total finishing solutions CERTIFICATE The Certification Body of TÜV SÜD Management Service GmbH certifies that Rösler Oberflächentechnik GmbH Hausen 1, 96231 Bad Staffelstein, Germany Vorstadt 1, 96190 Untermerzbach, Germany has established and applies an Energy Management System for Bad Staffelstein: Development and production of When it comes to surface finishing, Rösler is known to offer complete, well-engineered process consumables for the vibratory technology Untermerzbach: Development, production and sale of machines, installations and consumables for solutions. Based on our comprehensive knowledge of mass finishing and shot blasting technologies, the vibratory and shot-blasting technology. An audit was performed, Report No. 70010098. Proof has been furnished that the requirements according to we can provide our customers with practically unlimited finishing solutions. In our state-of-the- ISO 50001:2011 are fulfilled. The certificate is valid from 2016-11-28 until 2018-12-08. Certificate Registration No.: 12 340 10167 TMS. art test lab, we conduct meaningful test trials to develop the optimum finishing processes for our CERTIFICATE The Certification Body of TÜV SÜD Management Service GmbH Product Compliance Management Munich, 2016-12-01 certifies that customers because only complete solutions yield the best results. We are not simply offering specific Rösler Oberflächentechnik GmbH Hausen 1, 96231 Bad Staffelstein, Germany surface finishing processes but we are also supply perfectly matched auxiliary
    [Show full text]