July 30, 2019 Louise Carroll Commissioner Dept. of Housing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July 30, 2019 Louise Carroll Commissioner Dept. of Housing CITY OF NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD FOUR 330 West 42nd Street, 26th floor New York, NY 10036 tel: 212-736-4536 fax: 212-947-9512 www.nyc.gov/mcb4 BURT LAZARIN Chair JESSE R. BODINE District Manager July 30, 2019 Louise Carroll Commissioner Dept. of Housing Preservation and Development 100 Gold Street New York, NY 10007 Re: 606 West 30th Street Inclusionary Housing Plan Dear Commissioner Carroll, District Manager The Inclusionary Housing Plan Application (the “Application”) by West 30th Street LLC, or Lalezarian, (the “Applicant”) for the development of 606 West 30th Street (the “Project”) was discussed at the July 15th, 2019 meeting of Manhattan Community Board 4 (MCB4)’s Housing Health and Human Services Committee. By vote of 35 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 abstaining, and 0 present but not eligible to vote, MCB4 voted to recommend approval of the Application, with conditions. Background Block 675 Rezoning Block 675 lies in the northwest corner of Chelsea, bounded by West 29th and 30th Streets and Eleventh and Twelfth Avenues. Over the years, proposals for Block 675 have evolved from a park with an underground Department of Sanitation facility to being a gateway for an Olympic/Jets stadium to a coveted development site adjacent to the Hudson River, the High Line and the Western Rail Yards. 1 In 2013 CB4 prepared a study1 of Block 675 and the five blocks to the south, recommending to the Department of City Planning (DCP) that these blocks be studied for inclusion in an expanded Special West Chelsea District (SWCD). We specifically recommended that Block 675 be rezoned from M1-6 and M2-3 to C6-4 with building height and bulk regulations similar to those in SWCD Subarea A. Later in 2013, DCP released a study2 recommending that a planning framework to guide zoning decisions should be prepared for Block 675 when future uses were clearer. In 2017, the City Planning Commission (CPC) approved a Planning Framework3 for Block 675 that recommended C-6 districts with an “appropriate massing response to a transitioning context.” The Framework also recommended “active uses on frontages facing the High Line and transparency at and above the High Line level.” The western end of Block 675 is the site of the proposed Gateway Tunnel project. Preliminary plans call for part of the western portion of the Applicant’s proposed development site to be used for staging during tunnel construction. Both the timing and the extent of the tunnel project’s staging needs are currently unknown. Final Project Proposal: An Overview 2017 Proposed Project The original Application, certified on November 27, 2017, proposed a mixed-use building on Block 675 Lot 39. The development site is on the south side of the street between Eleventh and Twelfth Avenues and faces the High Line. The Applicant’s 2017 proposal included three commercial/retail stories and 33 residential stories with approximately 218 dwelling units, with 55 as Inclusionary units. MCB4 recommended denial of the Application unless certain conditions were met, as stated in the February 5, 2018 letter.4 During their presentation to the CLU committee, the applicant informally indicated that they were attempting to purchase the adjacent parcel, Lot 38 and hoped to include it in amended applications. The applicant reached an agreement to purchase Lot 38 and accordingly submitted amended applications. As a response to the recommendations made by MCB4 during the ULURP process, the Applicant made several project commitments, including matters on Inclusionary Housing. The Applicant’s June 18, 2018 letter to the Speaker of the City Council outlines those commitments. 5 2019 Proposed Project The revised proposed project is a 518 foot tall, 42 story, 207,320 square foot mixed use building at 606 West 30th Street, Block 675 Lot 39. The site will be rezoned from the current M2-3 to 1 MCB4 February 2013 Study for the Expansion of the SWCD 2 DCP June 2013 Study for the potential expansion of the SWCD 3 DCP May 2017 Block 675 Planning Framework 4 Letter from the Chelsea Land Use Committee, February 5th, 2018 5 Attachment A: Lalezarian Properties LLC June 18, 2018 Commitment Letter 2 C6-4X, increasing the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from two to ten. The applicant will purchase an additional two FAR, 29,625 sf of floor area, at $323.04/sf, totaling $9,570,000, from the Hudson River Park Trust pursuant to ZR 89-00 et seq. The revised proposed project is a building with four commercial/retail stories and 36 residential stories with approximately 277 dwelling units. 70 of these units will be affordable pursuant to the Mandatory Inclusionary Housing Option 1. Inclusionary Housing - Proposed Affordability Bands The Project is mapped within a Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) designated area and subject to its requirements. That program has multiple affordability options with different requirements regarding income. The Applicant has chosen Option #1 for their revised proposed project which requires 25% of the total residential floor area be devoted to affordable housing. This selection remains unchanged from the 2017 proposal. The income eligibility bands chosen by the Applicant for Option #1 are as follows: Family Size 1-person 2-person 3-person 4-person 40% AMI6 $ 29,880 $ 34,160 38,440 $ 42,680 60% AMI $ 44,820 $ 51,240 $57,660 $64,020 100% AMI $ 97,110 $ 111,020 $ 124,930 $ 138,710 Affordability Distribution The 2017 proposal by the Applicant included 162 market rate apartments with 55 permanently affordable housing units. Of the 55 Inclusionary apartments, 44 were distributed for low-income units at 40% and 60% AMI. 11 moderate-income units were at an affordability level of 100%. The revised proposed project includes 206 market rate apartments and 70 permanently affordable housing units. We thank the developer for their commitment to increasing the number of permanently affordable housing units. Of the 70 Inclusionary units, 56 are distributed for low-income units at 40% and 60% AMI. 14 moderate-income units will be at an affordability level of 100% AMI. The breakdown of the Project’s affordable units is as below. Distribution of Units by Income Band 6 AMI: Area Median Income. Based on the 2019 New York City AMI. 3 Income Band % of Units Unit Count 40% AMI 10% 31 60% AMI 10% 25 100% AMI 5% 14 Total 70 The Board supports the increased number of affordable units and the affordability band distribution. Apartment Distribution—by Floor The Applicant’s 2017 proposal entailed the distribution of Inclusionary apartments throughout 70% of the building. During the ULURP process, MCB4 requested the increase of this distribution rate to 80%, exceeding the 65% requirement of the MIH program. The revised proposed project entails a distribution of the 70 Inclusionary apartments throughout 80% of the building. The affordable units will be located on floors 5 through 34 of the building’s 36 residential floors. MCB4 has always advocated for an equitable distribution of affordable units in Inclusionary Housing developments and we thank the developer for committing to increase the distribution rate. The Board supports the increased floor distribution percentage. Apartment Distribution—by Apartment Size The Applicant’s original 2017 proposal includes 55 Inclusionary apartments. The Applicant’s revised proposed project is to include 70 Inclusionary apartments that whose sizes will be apportioned as shown in the chart below. Inclusionary Apartment Size Distribution Apartment Number of Size Units Studio 24 1 Bedroom 31 2 Bedroom 15 Total 70 MCB4 notes the Applicant is required by the New York City Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) to make 5% (14 units) of the apartments available to mobility-disabled applicants and 2% (6 units) of the apartments available to vision or hearing impaired applicants. The Board supports the proposed apartment size distribution. 4 Apartment Finishes The Applicant has agreed that all apartment finishes, flooring, tile, plumbing and light fixtures, kitchen cabinets, countertops, and appliances will be the same for affordable and market-rate apartments in their revised proposed project. Washers and dryers will also be installed in all apartments. The Board supports the proposed apartment finishes being the same in all apartments. Building-wide Amenities In response to the Applicant’s 2017 proposal, MCB4 recommended that free amenities should be accessible to all residents and that amenities with fees adopt a sliding scale amenity fee such as a reduction of 25% for middle-income tenants and 50% for low-income tenants. The Applicant’s revised proposed project includes: • A children’s playroom—no fee • Fitness facilities—sliding scale fees o 50% reduction for tenants at 40% and 60% AMI o 25% reduction for tenants at 100% AMI We thank the developer for committing to the MCB4’s recommendations on inclusionary amenities. Conclusion MCB4 is pleased the Applicant has increased the number of affordable units and agreed to the conditions previously made by the Board.7 The Applicant has shown a willingness to discuss the Board’s requests in a thoughtful manner. MCB4 therefore supports this project. This project will be an important addition to West Chelsea and these requests will further MCB4’s goal of fostering equitable, quality affordable housing that is economically integrated into our District. Sincerely, [Signed 7/30/19] Maria Ortiz, Co-Chair Joe Restuccia, Co-Chair Housing, Health & Human Services Committee Housing, Health & Human Services Committee 7 The Applicants’ Inclusionary Housing commitments are noted in Attachment B. – DRAFT – Final signed copy to follow 5 cc: Hon. Corey Johnson, Speaker, City Council Hon. Helen Rosenthal, City Council Hon. Jerry Nadler, U.S. Congress Hon. Brad Hoylman, New York State Senator Hon. Richard Gottfried, New York State Assembly Patricia Zafiriadas, Associate Commissioner, Housing Incentives, HPD Molly Park, Deputy Comm.
Recommended publications
  • Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20
    Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 83 85 82 12 41 62 ID PROPERTY UNITS 6 30 Morningside Drive 205 Total Lease Up 205 12 HAP Seven NY 129 15 418 West 126th Street 75 19 Victoria Theatre 191 15 Total Under Construction 395 19 37 Broadway Development 130 6 41 210 Wadsworth Avenue 98 46 Total Planned 228 43 96th Street 171 43 46 Frederick Douglass Blvd 100 37 62 4037 Broadway 132 82 The Heights on Broadway 171 83 Sherman Plaza 272 85 3875 9th Avenue 614 Total Prospective 1,460 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 44 73 ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 The Smile 233 3 Convivium 140 45 4 Sixty 125 141 4 39 23 26 5 Two Waterline Square 435 Total Lease Up 949 1 74 13 75 10 Sendero Verde Phase II 361 22 24 13 One East Harlem 404 25 Total Under Construction 765 49 22 15 West 118th Street 51 38 23 1971 Madison Avenue 93 10 24 72 East 120th Street 218 77 25 77 East 118th Street 202 47 26 East 127th Street 152 38 La Hermosa Tower 160 39 2031-2033 5th Avenue 240 Total Planned 1,116 48 44 58 West 135th Street 100 45 64-74 West 125th Street 200 47 1987-1991 3rd Avenue 59 76 48 1988-1996 2nd Avenue 185 49 248 East 120th Street 86 50 308 East 86th Street 68 78 52 Lenox Hill Hospital 200 73 Lenox Terrace Phase II 1,642 74 1800 Park Avenue 670 50 75 2460 2nd Avenue 730 3 76 321 East 96th Street 1,100 77 East River Plaza 1,100 52 5 78 Holmes Towers NextGen Development 339 Total Prospective 6,479 1000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND
    [Show full text]
  • June 28, 2020 Pursuant to Section 2896 (3) of the New York Public
    June 28, 2020 Pursuant to Section 2896 (3) of the New York Public Authorities Law, the Hudson River Park Trust reports that: (a) pursuant to Hudson River Park Act Section 7.3, the Hudson River Park Trust does not own any real property: it is the lessee under long term leases from each of the State and City of New York, respectively, demising all of the real property constituting Hudson River Park; and (b) the Hudson River Park Trust (the “Trust”) disposed of the following real property in Fiscal Year 2017-2018: 1. West 30th Street, LLC Action: Sale of Excess and Unused Development Rights Transaction Date: May 9, 2019 Purchase/Sale Price: $11,164,812.50 Property Address: Chelsea Piers, Block 662, Lots 11, 16 and 19 of the Tax Map of the Borough of Manhattan, County of New York, City of New York Description: Pursuant to the 2013 amendment to the Hudson River Park Act, the Trust sold 34,562.5 square feet of excess and unused development rights associated with Piers 59, 60 and 61 in the Chelsea section of New York City (the “Air Rights”). New York City amended its Zoning Resolution to allow for the transfer of the Air Rights to West 30th Street, LLC, which property is located across Route 9A/12th Avenue at 604 and 606 West 30th Street in Manhattan, New York (Tax Lot Block 675, Lots 38 and 39). An independent appraiser engaged by the Trust established the fair market value of the subject 34,562.5 square feet of Air Rights to be $11,164,812.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearings and Meetings
    1081 VOLUME CXLV NUMBER 43 MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2018 Price: $4.00 Office of Citywide Procurement . 1097 District Attorney - New York County . 1097 THE CITY RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS Purchasing . 1097 BILL DE BLASIO Environmental Protection ������������������������ 1097 Mayor PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS Water and Sewer Operations . 1097 Board Meetings . 1081 Fire Department . 1097 LISETTE CAMILO Commissioner, Department of Citywide Borough President - Bronx . 1082 Fiscal/Contracts . 1097 Administrative Services City Planning Commission . 1082 Parks and Recreation �������������������������������� 1098 City University ������������������������������������������ 1092 School Construction Authority . 1098 ELI BLACHMAN Community Boards . 1092 Contract Services . 1098 Editor, The City Record Employees’ Retirement System ���������������� 1093 Transportation ������������������������������������������ 1098 Franchise and Concession Review Roadway . 1098 Published Monday through Friday except legal holidays by the New York City Department of Committee . 1093 Traffic and Planning . 1098 Citywide Administrative Services under Authority Housing Authority . 1093 of Section 1066 of the New York City Charter. Office of Labor Relations �������������������������� 1093 CONTRACT AWARD HEARINGS Subscription $500 a year, $4.00 daily ($5.00 by Landmarks Preservation Commission . 1093 Aging ���������������������������������������������������������� 1099 mail). Periodicals Postage Paid at New York, N.Y. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to PROPERTY DISPOSITION SPECIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Comments Received During Significant Action Process
    Responses to Comments Received During Significant Action Process for Proposed Transfer by Sale of Unused Development Rights from Piers 59, 60, and 61 and the Associated Headhouse in the Chelsea Section of Hudson River Park A. Overview On February 13, 2018, pursuant to the Significant Action process mandated by the Hudson River Park Act (as amended, the “Act”), the Hudson River Park Trust (“HRPT”) issued a public notice (the “Notice”) inviting public review and comment regarding the proposed transfer by sale of (1) 123,437.5 square feet of unused development rights from Piers 59, 60 and 61 and the associated headhouse in the Chelsea section of Hudson River Park (the “Granting Site”) to DD West 29th LLC for its construction of a new building at 601 West 29th Street (“project site A”) and (2) 29,625 square feet, or in the alternate, 34,562.5 square feet of unused development rights from the Granting Site to West 30th Street LLC for its development of a new building at 606 West 30th Street, or in the alternative 604 to 606 West 30th Street (“project site B”) (together, the “Air Rights Transfer”). In tandem with HRPT’s Significant Action process, a number of actions pertaining to the proposed Block 675 East Project were separately reviewed through New York City’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (“ULURP”), City Environmental Quality Review (“CEQR”), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act and its implementing regulations in 6 NYCRR Part 617 (“SEQRA”). The New York City Department of City Planning (“DCP”), acting on behalf of the City Planning Commission (“CPC”), was designated the lead agency for the required environmental review, and the Trust was named as an involved agency.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of New York City's Hudson Yards Redevelopment Project
    An Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of New York City’s Hudson Yards Redevelopment Project Michael Meola Eric Kober Kei Hayashi March 13, 2019 An Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of New York City’s Hudson Yards Redevelopment Project Michael Meola Eric Kober Kei Hayashi March 13, 2019 Executive Summary: • The City’s goal to transform the Hudson Yards District from a largely vacant, underdeveloped transportation and distribution zone into a vibrant mixed-use, medium to high density district of workers, residents and visitors is being achieved ahead of projections, with over 30 million square feet of new development completed or in construction since the rezoning in 2005 • The $3.5 billion infrastructure investment that the City made, or has committed to fund, through Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation (HYIC) bonds to facilitate this transformation is paying off as the essential first step to attract vast private investment in the District that otherwise would not have occurred • Tax abatements in Hudson Yards are consistent with long-standing City practice to stimulate development where it is not occurring, and have contributed to the viability of commercial development in a previously fringe location • City payments to cover interest on HYIC’s bonds from 2007 to 2018 totaled $358 million; it is now estimated that future revenues from the District will not only pay off the bonds but will generate more than $21 billion in net revenues to the City • The opening on March 15th of the Related/Oxford Hudson Yards Project, the largest in the City’s history, built over the MTA Rail Yard on a billion-dollar privately funded platform, is the symbol of this remarkably successful public/private development that evidences the enormous strength of the City’s economy • The MTA has received over $1.2 billion for its property over the MTA Rail Yard and retains valuable development rights that it will be able to sell in the future • Additional benefits to the City include extension of the No.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to DCP Re ULURP Application for 606 W. 30Th
    CITY OF NEW YORK MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD FOUR nd th 330 West 42 Street, 26 floor New York, NY 10036 tel: 212-736-4536 fax: 212-947-9512 www.nyc.gov/mcb4 BURT LAZARIN Chair JESSE R. BODINE District Manager th February 5 , 2018 Marisa Lago, Chair New York City Planning Commission 120 Broadway 31st Floor New York, NY 10271 re: 180150 ZMM; N 180151 ZRM; 180152 ZSM – 606 West 30th Street – Block 675 Lot 39 Dear Chair Lago: On the recommendation of its Chelsea Land Use Committee, the Executive Committee of Manhattan Community Board 4 (CB4) voted to recommend denial of the cited applications for a proposed development at 606 West 30th Street – Block 675 Lot 39 - unless the conditions and recommendations in Section XI below are met. This letter is subject to ratification by the full board at its February 7, 2018 meeting. I. Background Block 675 lies in the northwest corner of Chelsea, bounded by West 29th and 30th Streets and by Eleventh and Twelfth Avenues. Over the years, proposals for Block 675 have evolved from a park with an underground Department of Sanitation facility to being a gateway for an Olympic/Jets stadium to a coveted development site adjacent to the Hudson River, the High Line and the Western Rail Yards. In 2013 CB4 prepared a study of Block 675 and the five blocks to the south, recommending to the Department of City Planning (DCP) that these blocks be studied for inclusion in an expanded Special West Chelsea District (SWCD). We specifically recommended that Block 675 be rezoned from M1-6 and M2-3 to C6-4 with building height and bulk regulations similar to those in SWCD Subarea A.
    [Show full text]
  • CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | May 2018
    CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | May 2018 ULURP PIPELINE New Applications Certified into ULURP PROJECT DESCRIPTION COMM. BD. ULURP NO. CERTIFIED South Shore of Staten Island Coastal Site selection and city map amendment SI3, JIA 95 180302 PSR; May 7, 2018 Storm Risk Management Phase II 180303 MMR 27-01 Jackson Avenue Disposition of c-o-p and special permits Q2 180385 PPQ; May 7, 2018 180382 ZSQ; 180383 ZSQ 26-32 Jackson Avenue Disposition of c-o-p and special permit Q2 180386 PPQ; May 7, 2018 180384 ZSQ Variety Boys and Girls Club Rezoning Zoning map and zoning text amendments Q1 180085 ZMQ; May 7, 2018 N180086 ZRQ 11-14 35th Avenue Rezoning Zoning map and zoning text amendments Q1 180211 ZMQ; May 7, 2018 N180212 ZRQ Lefferts Boulevard Rezoning Zoning map amendment Q10 180304 ZMQ May 7, 2018 3901 9th Avenue Rezoning Zoning map and zoning text amendments K12 180186 ZMK; May 7, 2018 N180187 ZRK 110 East 16th Street Special permits M5 180263 ZSM; May 21, 2018 180264 ZSM United Federation of Black Community Acquisition M12 150263 PQM May 21, 2018 Organizations Children Care Development Center Friends of Crown Heights 16 Child Care Acquisition K8 160363 PQK May 21, 2018 Center Friends of Crown Heights 17 Child Care Acquisition K5 170146 PQK May 21, 2018 Center Brooklyn Fleet Services Workshop Site selection and acquisition K6 180418 PCK May 21, 2018 East 241st Street Rezoning Zoning map and zoning text amendments X12 180083 ZMX; May 21, 2018 N180084 ZRX CITYLAND | May 2018 | www.CityLandNYC.org C-1 BSA PIPELINE New Applications Filed with BSA — May 2018 APPLICANT PROJECT/ADDRESS DESCRIPTION APP.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Changes from the Last Voted on Affordable Housing Plan (June 2016)
    MCB4 Affordable Plan Updates: List of Changes from the last voted on Affordable Housing Plan (June 2016). October, 2019 Page Number (these page numbers Broad Updates: refer to the 2019 plan) 3 Updated Table of Contents 2 Updated Board and Officers 4,39,47,54,65,72,80, 112,114, 115 Throughout, updated summary chart numbers 114-115 Added overall summary into plan from appendix 119 Credits page updates 118 Appendix B. AMI Updated Title pages: 21,22,48,55,66,73,81, 94,99,105,113 Added in title pages Maps Updates: 20 Updated Affordable Housing Sites in MCD4 Map 23,24,41,49,56,56, 67,74,111 Updated map at beginning of each Site Section 89-92 Added new SWCD maps including NYCHA Maps Narratives Updates: 18 Brought Narratives up to front and reorganized for clarity 88 Added Slide about NYCHA and SWCD th th 87 Added note in SWCD about 606 W 30 and 201 W 29 11 Updated Points of Agreement Numbers Sites Updates (From 2016 Plan): Properties that moved from “In Construction” to “Completed”: th 26 625 W 57 street th 34 424 W 55 street 37 301 W 46th street th 27 555 10 avenue th 33 525 W 28 street th 35 606 W 57 street rd 38 540 W 53 street nd 33 525 W 52 street th 30 515 W 28 street TH 31 509 W 38 street Properties that moved from “Completed Review” to “Completed”: th 36 429 W 18 street Properties that moved from “Under Review” to “Under construction”: MCB4 Affordable Plan Updates: List of Changes from the last voted on Affordable Housing Plan (June 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12B: Vibration
    Chapter 12B: Vibration 12B.1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 12 of this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) presents the evaluation the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ TRANSIT) conducted of the potential noise and vibration impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Hudson Tunnel Project. It is divided into two subchapters, Chapter 12A, “Noise,” and Chapter 12B, “Vibration.” Chapter 12A presents the assessment of potential noise impacts associated with the Preferred Alternative undertaken by FRA and NJ TRANSIT. In Chapter 12B, FRA and NJ TRANSIT have assessed the potential vibration impacts associated with the Preferred Alternative by examining projected future vibration levels resulting from the Project at sensitive receptors near the Project site. This chapter evaluates the potential for adverse vibration impacts from both construction and operation of the Preferred Alternative and presents potential measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate vibration impacts. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), in its role as Project Sponsor, has accepted and relied on the evaluations and conclusions of this chapter. This chapter reflects the following changes made since the Draft EIS (DEIS) for the Hudson Tunnel Project: • The DEIS provided the noise and vibration analyses in one chapter, Chapter 12, “Noise and Vibration.” The chapter is now divided into two parts for the Final EIS (FEIS) to simplify the presentation of the analysis. • FRA and NJ TRANSIT revised the vibration analyses using the Federal Transit Administration’s updated methodology, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, FTA Report No. 0123, September 2018. • FRA and NJ TRANSIT updated the vibration analysis to include new residences and a park on Paterson Plank Road in North Bergen, New Jersey and a future development currently under construction on Manhattan Avenue in Union City, New Jersey that were not present when the DEIS was prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • C 180152A Zsm-606 West 30Th Street- Lalezarian
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION May 7, 2018 / Calendar No. 10 C 180152A ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by West 30th Street LLC pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 and proposed for modification pursuant to Section 2-06(c)(1) of the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 89-21* of the Zoning Resolution: 1. to allow the distribution of 34,562.5 square feet of floor area from a granting site (B1, Block 662, Lots 11, 16 & 19) to a receiving site (B2, Block 675, Lots 38 & 39); 2. to modify the height and setback requirements of Section 35-65 (Height and Setback Requirements for Quality Housing Buildings) and Section 23-60 (Height and Setback Regulations); and 3. to modify the rear yard requirements of Section 33-26 (Minimum Required Rear Yards); in connection with a proposed mixed used development on property located at 606 West 30th Street (Block 675, Lots 38 and 39), in a C6-4X District, within the Special Hudson River Park District (HRP), Borough of Manhattan, Community District 4. *197-d(b)(2) eligible An application for a special permit pursuant to the Zoning Resolution (ZR) Section 89-21 (Transfer of Floor Area from Hudson River Park), as modified by a related proposed zoning text amendment (N 180151 ZRM), was filed by West 30th Street LLC on November 21, 2017 to facilitate the redevelopment of 606 West 30th Street in Manhattan Community District 4 with a mix of uses.
    [Show full text]
  • March 7, 2018 Recommendation on ULURP Application
    March 7, 2018 Recommendation on ULURP Application Nos. C 180150 ZMM, N 180151 ZRM, and C 180152 ZSM; N 180151 (A) ZRM and C 180152(A) ZSM – 606 West 30th Street By West 30th LLC PROPOSED ACTIONS West 30th LLC (the “applicant”) is seeking a zoning text amendment, a zoning map amendment, and a special permit pursuant to the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York (“ZR”) Section 89-21 in order to facilitate the development of the property located at 606 West 30th Street in Manhattan (Block 675, Lot 39) (the “Development Site”) with a mix of residential and commercial uses (the “Proposed Project”). The Proposed Project would have approximately 177,750 zoning square feet of mixed residential and commercial floor area, including affordable housing. Zoning Text Amendment (C 180150 ZRM) The applicant is seeking a zoning text amendment to create a Map in the Appendix to the Special Hudson River Park District Regulations (ZR Section 89-00) to define Piers 59, 60, and 61 and their associated headhouses, which are located in a portion of Hudson River Park, as a “granting site” and Block 675, Lots 38 and 39 as a “receiving site” and to modify certain provisions of the Special Hudson River Park District (the "SHRPD"). The zoning text amendment would also map a Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (“MIH”) designated area on the Development Site, per Appendix F of the Zoning Resolution. In evaluating the text amendment, this office must consider whether the modifications and new special permit are appropriate and beneficial to the community in which the eligible sites and proposed project are situated.
    [Show full text]
  • The City Record
    2521 VOLUME CXLV NUMBER 91 THURSDAY, MAY 10, 2018 Price: $4.00 City University . 2545 LaGuardia Community College � � � � � � � �2545 THE CITY RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS Citywide Administrative Services . 2545 Comptroller . 2545 BILL DE BLASIO Information Systems � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2545 Mayor PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS Design and Construction . 2545 Borough President - Brooklyn . 2521 LISETTE CAMILO Agency Chief Contracting Officer � � � � � � �2545 City Council . 2522 Commissioner, Department of Citywide Housing Authority ��������������������������������������� 2546 City Planning Commission ������������������������� 2531 Administrative Services Citywide Administrative Services . 2533 Supply Management � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2546 Community Boards . 2534 Parks and Recreation . 2546 ELI BLACHMAN Contracts � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2546 Design Commission ������������������������������������� 2535 Editor, The City Record Finance ��������������������������������������������������������� 2536 Revenue � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2546 Police ������������������������������������������������������������� 2547 Housing Authority ��������������������������������������� 2536 Published Monday through Friday except legal Landmarks Preservation Commission ������� 2536 Contract Administration � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2547 holidays by the New York City Department of Transportation ��������������������������������������������� 2537 School Construction Authority �������������������
    [Show full text]