2019-20 Men's Basketball
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Men's Basketball Coaching Records
MEN’S BASKETBALL COACHING RECORDS Overall Coaching Records 2 NCAA Division I Coaching Records 4 Coaching Honors 31 Division II Coaching Records 36 Division III Coaching Records 39 ALL-DIVISIONS COACHING RECORDS Some of the won-lost records included in this coaches section Coach (Alma Mater), Schools, Tenure Yrs. WonLost Pct. have been adjusted because of action by the NCAA Committee 26. Thad Matta (Butler 1990) Butler 2001, Xavier 15 401 125 .762 on Infractions to forfeit or vacate particular regular-season 2002-04, Ohio St. 2005-15* games or vacate particular NCAA tournament games. 27. Torchy Clark (Marquette 1951) UCF 1970-83 14 268 84 .761 28. Vic Bubas (North Carolina St. 1951) Duke 10 213 67 .761 1960-69 COACHES BY WINNING PERCENT- 29. Ron Niekamp (Miami (OH) 1972) Findlay 26 589 185 .761 1986-11 AGE 30. Ray Harper (Ky. Wesleyan 1985) Ky. 15 316 99 .761 Wesleyan 1997-05, Oklahoma City 2006- (This list includes all coaches with a minimum 10 head coaching 08, Western Ky. 2012-15* Seasons at NCAA schools regardless of classification.) 31. Mike Jones (Mississippi Col. 1975) Mississippi 16 330 104 .760 Col. 1989-02, 07-08 32. Lucias Mitchell (Jackson St. 1956) Alabama 15 325 103 .759 Coach (Alma Mater), Schools, Tenure Yrs. WonLost Pct. St. 1964-67, Kentucky St. 1968-75, Norfolk 1. Jim Crutchfield (West Virginia 1978) West 11 300 53 .850 St. 1979-81 Liberty 2005-15* 33. Harry Fisher (Columbia 1905) Fordham 1905, 16 189 60 .759 2. Clair Bee (Waynesburg 1925) Rider 1929-31, 21 412 88 .824 Columbia 1907, Army West Point 1907, LIU Brooklyn 1932-43, 46-51 Columbia 1908-10, St. -
What Style of Ball Should a College Basketball Team Play? Evan Nelson Ouachita Baptist University
Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Scholars Day Carl Goodson Honors Program 4-2018 What Style of Ball Should a College Basketball Team Play? Evan Nelson Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/scholars_day Part of the Sports Management Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Recommended Citation Nelson, Evan, "What Style of Ball Should a College Basketball Team Play?" (2018). Scholars Day. 36. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/scholars_day/36 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholars Day by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: COLLEGE BASKETBALL PLAYING STYLE 1 What Style of Ball Should a College Basketball Team Play? January 14, 2018 COLLEGE BASKETBALL PLAYING STYLE 2 Abstract The question I am trying to answer in this paper is “what style of ball should a college basketball team play?” To answer this question, I analyzed the data of points per game, opponent points per game, and winning percentage of every Division I and Division II and almost every Division III basketball team for the 2016-17 season. I concluded that offense is slightly more important than defense for Division II and Division III college basketball teams. Division II and Division III coaches can apply this finding by emphasizing their recruiting on better scorers. Keywords: player selection, playing style, recruiting COLLEGE BASKETBALL PLAYING STYLE 3 What Style of Ball Should a College Basketball Team Play? The question I am trying to answer in this paper is “what style of ball should a college basketball team play?” I got the idea for this question from the chapter in Tobias J. -
2020-21 Men's Basketball
GAME 16 vs. 14/15 West Virginia // Saturday, January 23, 2021 2020-21 MEN’S BASKETBALL // GAME NOTES 1,600+ ALL-TIME VICTORIES // 31 NCAA TOURNAMENTS // 4 FINAL FOURS [1948, 1951, 1958, 1964] // 21 CONFERENCE TITLES [5-10, 1-6 Big 12] vs. 14/15 [9-4, 2-3 Big 12] n 2020-21 SCHEDULE & RECORD K-STATE WEST VIRGINIA Saturday, January 23 // 3:05 p.m. CT // Bramlage Coliseum (12,528) // Manhattan, Kan. Overall Record: 5-10 WILDCATS MOUNTAINEERS Big 12: 1-6 n Non-Conference: 4-4 Head Coach: Bruce Weber Head Coach: Bob Huggins Home: 4-7 n Away: 1-3 n Neutral: 0-0 Record at K-State: 166-120/9th Year Record at WVU: 300-165/14th Year MATCHUP Career Record: 479-275/23rd Year Career Record: 890-376/39th Year NOVEMBER vs. WVU: 7-10 (5-3 at home) vs. K-State: 11-7 (3-5 on the road) Little Apple Classic (Bramlage Coliseum; Manhattan, Kan.) Wed. 25 DRAKE ESPNU L, 70-80 Colorado vs. South Dakota ESPN+ CU 84-61 OPENING TIP Fri. 27 Drake vs. South Dakota DU 69-53 u Kansas State (5-10, 1-6 Big 12) returns home to Bramlage Coliseum on Saturday COLORADO ESPNU L, 58-76 afternoon, as the Wildcats play host to No. 14/15 West Virginia (9-4, 2-3 Big 12) at 3 n GAME INFORMATION Mon. 30 KANSAS CITY ESPNU W, 62-58 p.m., CT. K-State has won consecutive games against WVU at home, including an 84- 68 upset of the No. -
Aw a Rd Wi Nners
Aw_MBB01_sp 10/10/01 11:15 AM Page 107 Awa r d Win n e r s Division I Consensus All-American Selections .. .1 0 8 Division I Academic All-Americans By Tea m .. .1 1 3 Division I Player of the Yea r. .1 1 4 Divisions II and III Fi r s t - Te a m All-Americans By Tea m. .1 1 6 Divisions II and III Ac a d e m i c All-Americans By Tea m. .1 1 8 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners By Tea m. .1 1 9 Awar MBKB01 10/9/01 1:41 PM Page 108 10 8 DIVISION I CONSENSUS ALL-AMERICA SELECTIONS Division I Consensus All-America Selections Second Tea m —R o b e r t Doll, Colorado; Wil f re d Un r uh, Bradley, 6-4, Toulon, Ill.; Bill Sharman, Southern By Season Do e rn e r , Evansville; Donald Burness, Stanford; George Ca l i f o r nia, 6-2, Porte r ville, Calif. Mu n r oe, Dartmouth; Stan Modzelewski, Rhode Island; Second Tea m —Charles Cooper, Duquesne; Don 192 9 John Mandic, Oregon St. Lofgran, San Francisco; Kevin O’Shea, Notre Dame; Don Charley Hyatt, Pittsburgh; Joe Schaaf, Pennsylvania; Rehfeldt, Wisconsin; Sherman White, Long Island. Charles Murphy, Purdue; Ver n Corbin, California; Thomas 1943 Ch u r chill, Oklahoma; John Thompson, Montana St. First Te a m— A n d rew Phillip, Illinois; Georg e 1951 193 0 Se n e s k y , St. Joseph’s; Ken Sailors, Wyoming; Harry Boy- First Tea m —Bill Mlkvy, Temple, 6-4, Palmerton, Pa.; ko f f, St. -
2013-14 Men's Basketball Records Book
Award Winners Division I Consensus All-America Selections .................................................... 2 Division I Academic All-Americans By School ..................................................... 8 Division I Player of the Year ..................... 10 Divisions II and III Players of the Year ................................................... 12 Divisions II and III First-Team All-Americans by School ....................... 13 Divisions II and III Academic All-Americans by School ....................... 15 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners by School................................... 17 2 2013-14 NCAA MEN'S BASKETBALL RECORDS - DIVISION I CONSENSUS ALL-AMERICA SELECTIONS Division I Consensus All-America Selections 1917 1930 By Season Clyde Alwood, Illinois; Cyril Haas, Princeton; George Charley Hyatt, Pittsburgh; Branch McCracken, Indiana; Hjelte, California; Orson Kinney, Yale; Harold Olsen, Charles Murphy, Purdue; John Thompson, Montana 1905 Wisconsin; F.I. Reynolds, Kansas St.; Francis Stadsvold, St.; Frank Ward, Montana St.; John Wooden, Purdue. Oliver deGray Vanderbilt, Princeton; Harry Fisher, Minnesota; Charles Taft, Yale; Ray Woods, Illinois; Harry Young, Wash. & Lee. 1931 Columbia; Marcus Hurley, Columbia; Willard Hyatt, Wes Fesler, Ohio St.; George Gregory, Columbia; Joe Yale; Gilmore Kinney, Yale; C.D. McLees, Wisconsin; 1918 Reiff, Northwestern; Elwood Romney, BYU; John James Ozanne, Chicago; Walter Runge, Colgate; Chris Earl Anderson, Illinois; William Chandler, Wisconsin; Wooden, Purdue. Steinmetz, Wisconsin; -
Don't Expect Much to Change in Big 12 Page 1 of 2
ESPN.com - Don't expect much to change in Big 12 Page 1 of 2 ESPN.com: Katz [Print without images] Wednesday, May 2, 2012 Don't expect much to change in Big 12 If the most pressing issue for the Big 12 in its new configuration is how to schedule West Virginia road trips, there isn't much to be concerned about going forward. The Big 12 men's basketball coaches wrapped up their meetings Tuesday in Phoenix with its new members -- West Virginia and TCU -- replacing the departed Missouri and Texas A&M. And the consensus was that the league is actually as strong as it's ever been. "I never questioned the stability," Texas coach Rick Barnes said. "The anchors were always the ones that wanted to keep it together -- Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. I know our AD [DeLoss Dodds] never wavered on keeping the league together. We're very comfortable with where it is right now." The Big 12 made an easy switch in adding West Virginia and TCU. The league will continue as a 10- The Big 12 welcomes WVU, which has made five team conference for the foreseeable future with a new straight NCAA tourney trips under Bob Huggins. television agreement that will ensure even more status quo. Kansas is coming off an appearance in the national title game. Baylor made an Elite Eight trip for the second time in three years. And four others made the NCAA tournament, meaning 60 percent of the league went dancing. The odds are high that the Big 12 can duplicate that percentage going forward. -
Bob Huggins BASKETBALL FANTASY CAMP JUNE 5 - JUNE 7, 2020 MORGANTOWN, WV the LEGEND BOB HUGGINS YOUR HOST, COACH THEGAME
Bob Huggins BASKETBALL FANTASY CAMP JUNE 5 - JUNE 7, 2020 MORGANTOWN, WV YOUR HOST, BOB HUGGINS, IS ONE OF THE GREATEST COACHES TO EVER PLAY AND COACH THE GAME. THE LEGEND I would like you to be one of the select 40 invited campers to my Bob Huggins’ Basketball Fantasy Camp, to be held at the fabulous West Virginia University Coliseum and new state-of-the-art practice facility. I am a Morgantown native and 1977 graduate of West Virginia University, compiling 880+ wins in my 37 seasons as a head coach. I rank third in total victories among active Division I head coaches. I am a three-time Academic All-American and three-year letterman. It is my sincere desire to give something back to the game. This Basketball Fantasy Camp is just one of the events I use to do this. At my Basketball Fantasy Camp we will be concentrating on developing your basketball knowledge. In addition, you will have the opportunity to develop personal relationships with the country’s top basketball coaches and former great Mountaineer players, as well as many other highly successful people. You will participate in basketball drills, fun contests and daily 5-on-5 games, all under the watchful eyes of our coaching staff. No better coaching staff has ever been assembled. We will eat together, compete together and socialize together. I will be directly involved on a daily basis and intend to make this a memorable experience for everyone. I look forward to meeting you and shaking your hand on June 5th. -
Coaching Staff
Gopher Basketball 2008-09 Coaching Staff [ 71 ] Minnesota Basketball 2008-09 Gopher Basketball 2008-09 Head Coach Tubby Smith TUBBY SMITH Head Coach n March 23, 2007 Tubby Smith was announced as the 16th head bas - ketball coach of the Minnesota Golden Gophers Men’s Basketball pro - gram. One of the most respected coaches in the country and a nation - O al champion was coming to Gold Country to lead the Gopher program. The excitement of bringing one of the top coaches in the country to the University of Minnesota was only matched by the satisfaction of welcoming one of the classiest individuals in the world of college basketball today to the Maroon and Gold. In his first season at the “U”, Smith took a team that had won nine games the season before to a 20-14 record. The Gophers finished sixth in the Big Ten Conference at 8-10 and were the sixth seed in the Big Ten Tournament. The 11-game improvement in the win column from the 2006-07 season is the largest season turn - around in school history and tied for the second-best turnaround in Division I in 2007-08. Also, the five-win improvement in conference play was the second biggest Big Ten turnaround in 2007-08. Smith came to Minnesota with a reputation for winning at the highest level not matched by many coaches in the country. In his 17-year career, he has claimed a National Title (Kentucky in 1997-98), made four “Elite Eight appearances”, nine “Sweet Sixteen” appearances, posted 15 straight 20-win seasons and has the 12th-best active winning percentage of any coach at the Division I level with a 407-159 record (.719). -
Aw a Rd Wi Nners
Awar MBKB02 10/21/02 10:19 AM Page 107 Awa r d Win n e r s Division I Consensus All-American Selections.. .1 0 8 Division I Academic All-Americans By Tea m. .1 1 3 Division I Player of the Yea r .. .1 1 4 Divisions II and III Fi r s t - Te a m All-Americans By Tea m. .1 1 6 Divisions II and III Ac a d e m i c All-Americans By Tea m. .1 1 8 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners By Tea m .. .1 1 9 Awar MBKB02 10/21/02 10:19 AM Page 108 10 8 DIVISION I CONSENSUS ALL-AMERICA SELECTIONS Division I Consensus All-America Selections Second Tea m —R o b e r t Doll, Colorado; Wil f re d Un r uh, Bradley, 6-4, Toulon, Ill.; Bill Sharman, Southern By Season Do e rn e r , Evansville; Donald Burness, Stanford; George Ca l i f o r nia, 6-2, Porte r ville, Calif. Mu n r oe, Dartmouth; Stan Modzelewski, Rhode Island; Second Tea m —Charles Cooper, Duquesne; Don 192 9 John Mandic, Oregon St. Lofgran, San Francisco; Kevin O’Shea, Notre Dame; Don Charley Hyatt, Pittsburgh; Joe Schaaf, Pennsylvania; Rehfeldt, Wisconsin; Sherman White, Long Island. Charles Murphy, Purdue; Ver n Corbin, California; Thomas 1943 Ch u r chill, Oklahoma; John Thompson, Montana St. First Te a m— A n d rew Phillip, Illinois; Georg e 1951 193 0 Se n e s k y , St. Joseph’s; Ken Sailors, Wyoming; Harry Boy- First Tea m —Bill Mlkvy, Temple, 6-4, Palmerton, Pa.; ko f f, St. -
Justin Patton Biography (Includes 2016-17)
Justin Patton Biography (Includes 2016-17) Justin 7-0 • 230 Patton Freshman • Center Omaha, Neb. Game-by-Game Statistics #23 Justin Patton’s Game-by-Game Stats Opponent Min FG Pct 3FG Pct FT Pct O-D-R A T B S Pts. UMKC• 22 4-7 .571 0-1 .000 4-7 .571 1-7-8 2 0 1 0 12 #9 WISCONSIN• 29 5-6 .833 0-0 --- 0-1 .000 3-4-7 0 0 1 1 10 Washington State• 15 5-7 .714 0-1 .000 0-2 .000 1-3-4 0 1 0 0 10 North Carolina State• 18 4-5 .800 0-0 --- 2-4 .500 1-4-5 1 0 0 1 10 Ole Miss• 28 5-7 .714 0-0 --- 1-2 .500 2-3-5 2 3 2 0 11 #23 LOYOLA (MD.)• 19 8-8 1.000 0-0 --- 1-2 .500 0-6-6 0 1 0 1 17 BUFFALO• 32 9-10 .900 1-1 1.000 2-4 .500 4-6-10 0 1 2 1 21 AKRON• 26 5-7 .714 1-1 1.000 0-1 .000 2-5-7 2 1 2 3 11 Nebraska• 21 4-4 1.000 0-0 --- 1-4 .250 3-5-8 0 2 3 1 9 LONGWOOD• 15 4-5 .800 1-1 1.000 0-1 .000 0-3-3 2 1 3 3 9 2016-17 Season Highlights ORAL ROBERTS• 30 5-8 .625 0-0 --- 0-0 --- 0-6-6 1 0 2 0 10 • Redshirt freshman who was one of 10 finalists for the Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Award Arizona State• 33 6-10 .600 1-1 1.000 5-6 .833 1-2-3 4 0 3 1 18 (National Center of the Year) and one of 12 men on the midseason list for the SETON HALL• 33 8-13 .615 0-1 .000 1-2 .500 0-9-9 1 2 1 2 17 Wayman Tisdale Award (National Freshman of the Year). -
Spectator 1969-10-23 Editors of the Ps Ectator
Seattle nivU ersity ScholarWorks @ SeattleU The peS ctator 10-23-1969 Spectator 1969-10-23 Editors of The pS ectator Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator Recommended Citation Editors of The peS ctator, "Spectator 1969-10-23" (1969). The Spectator. 1174. http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator/1174 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The peS ctator by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. State BSU Convention Here Saturday by Kathy McCarthy Brown has been out of jail for two months. dueled In "rap sessions" on such topics as News Editor Any state has the right to accept or reject the role of the black man in society, the use school, A state-wide convention of Black Student his request to enter and Washington's de- of his education out of his community Unions will definitely meet on the S.U. cam- cision is not yet known. role, etc. The convention will be filmed. pus this weekend, according to Emile Wilson, NATHAN WRIGHT, head of the Black president of S.U.s B.S.U. S.U.s Black Student Union requested use Studies program at New York City's Colum- of campus facilities for the convention when Plans were completed this week and the bia University, will address the convention. AstroTurf room of the Connolly P.E. Center it was learned that delegates would be gath- Bobby Davis is also scheduled to speak. in Seattle but did not have a definite has heen secured for convention use. -
The Best Coach Evaluation Based on CW-TOPSIS Xudong Yang North China Electric Power University, Baoding, China
2nd Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA 2016) The Best Coach Evaluation Based on CW-TOPSIS Xudong Yang North China Electric Power University, Baoding, China Keywords: best coach, evaluation, Composite Weight, TOPSIS, AHP, entropy Abstract. We analyze the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Prefer- ence by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS). We build an old model based on the combination of them, which is named AHP-TOPSIS. The old model is built as: First, use the AHP to determine the weight of each factor on the coach’s evaluation. Then, use TOPSIS to rank the coaches. After ana- lyzing the result of the old model, we draw a conclusion that the weight vector calculated by AHP is subjective. Therefore, we decide to find a more objective method.Next, we build a totally new evaluation method based on the Entropy and AHP, which is named Composite Weight-TOPSIS (CWTOPSIS). The AHP is a representative of calculating subjective weight, which ignores the ob- jective factors. The Entropy is a representative of calculating objective weight. It depends on objec- tive numerical indicators, but ignores the relevant experts experience and subjective judgment. So we introduced the preference factor β to combine them together. We compare the results of the two models, and we can see the improved one has more advantages. Then, we take other factors into consideration: time the coach coaches and gender of the coach. We analyze them separately, and draw the conclusion that the time factor does affect the evaluation result and the gender factor has little influence on the final result.