Cogjm.Crsp Strong America.Pdf (2.584Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cogjm.Crsp Strong America.Pdf (2.584Mb) This booklet is published by the Upper Colorado River Commission. The Commission is the official agency representing the Federal Government and the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming in matters relating to the development and use of the water resources apportioned to the Upper Basin States by the Colorado River Compact and the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. ,,,. UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION Headquarters: 748 North Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado Cover Photo by Hal Rumel ~ ~· a,:;;;m 1T.'9 I It - ~, • :r, I * Authorized Projects ,>,,~ Projects subject to opproval and () authorization by Congress • Authorized Storage Dams Storage dam subject to approval II and authorization by Congress THE COLORADO: RIVER OF DESTINY The Colorado River is one of the great rivers of the world. It slashes across the western United States for 1700 miles, carving an awesome and Cenfro/ Utoh savage path and draining almost one-twelfth of the land area of the United States. UTAH This is the river that ripped wide fantastic Grand Canyon, a river that has its birth in the snow-cap­ ped Rockies and rolls through fertile valleys and picturesque canyons, across the southwestern desert. This is a strange river, this mighty Colorado. It's a river of destiny. DO That destiny, dreamed of by man for centuries, is to serve man. It is to provide the water that is the lifeblood of the West, to provide water for man to drink and to use to make this nation grow and prosper. Water in the west is the key to industrial and agricultural progress, and the Colorado River is the last big undeveloped "water hole" that will provide the means for conquering our last great frontier. :W MEXICO ARIZONA I By putting water from the Colorado River to use ~<>.f -by fulfilling this destiny-man will add greatly to w~ the nation's growth.Just what this Upper River development can mean to the people of the United States in new markets for goods and in a thousand other ways has been demonstrated in the Lower Basin of the Colorado, where part of the river has been tamed and the water put to use. The Lower Colorado River, its water and might harnessed by Hoover Dam, Imperial Dam, Davis Dam, Parker Dam, Morelos Dam and other de­ velopments, has been made to yield fantastic bene­ fits, not only for Southern California and Mexico but for the entire nation. But this is only half the story. A major volume in the history of the Colorado River is yet to be written: the development of the Upper Basin. , A plan to develop the river in its upper half has been devised after years of planning. The plan has been checked and re-checked, and it is sound in every respect. It is engineeringly and financially feasible. It protects completely Lower River rights. It pays for itself. ALLOCATION OF WATER was agreed upon through It is a magnificent plan, great for the West, great the Colorado River Com­ for America and great for all of its people. pact signed in 1922 and the Mexican Water Treaty of 1945. These agreements This plan is the Colorado River Storage Project. were approved by all parties concerned and roli· 1,500,000 fled by the Congress of the ACRE-FEET ANNUALLY United States. 2 ~--- ....... ~ - ~ - ,··-.JJ>\, ..,,.., . ~- ' How is a basin-wide project planned? The Colorado River Storage Project will be constructed In the case of the Colorado River Storage Project, under terms ef the Colorado River Compact. Otherwise, the engineering planning began many years ago. the Federal Government would never recommend such a development. Then came an honorable agreement among states to provide for that development. When all units of the Colorado River Storage Project proposed in current legislation are built, the That agreement, the Colorado River Compact, Upper Basin states will still be using less than 4 was negotiated in 1922 by seven states, Arizona, 1 million acre-feet annually, far short of-their 7 /2 California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah million acre-feet allotment. That 4 million acre-feet and Wyoming. This Compact subsequently was includes all present development and all units pro­ approved by the governors of those states, ratified posed for construction in the bill now before the by state legislatures and by the Congress of the House of Representatives. United States. Under provisions of the Colorado River Compact, This Compact was meant to open the door for a separate compact between the four Upper Basin development of both the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River. It has been highly successful states (Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyo­ ming) was negotiated in 1948. This is known as the in the Lower Basin, especially in southern California, but little development has taken place in the Upper Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. Basin. The Colorado River Storage Project meets pro­ The Compact recognized a dividing line between visions of that com pact as well as of the Colorado River Compact. the Upper and the Lower Basins, at Lee-; Ferry, Arizona. The Compact provides that the Upper LEE FERRY ... division point between upper and lower basin. 1/ 2 Basin can consume 7 million acre-feet of water River measurements will assure each year, and that the Lower Basin can use 81/2 lower basin offull share of water. million acre-feet. By treaty, Mexico is granted use of 11/ 2 million acre-feet. An acre-foot of water is that amount which would cover one acre to a depth of one foot. 3 MENACE OR NATURAL RESOURCE? River of menace or natural resource of national In the spring, when snows in the mountains melt, significance? the river rises swiftly, casting aside its winter dor­ That is the question concerning the Upper Colo­ mancy to become a flooding river that gouges deep rado River today. It can go on as a wild and turbu­ and treacherous channels. In the summer the river's lent stream or be put to work for man's good in the tributaries slow to a trickle; some of them stop· Upper Basin as has already been accomplished in altogether. When the water is most needed, it is the Lower Basin. gone. This was the problem. The Colorado River Storage Project provides the answer. The engineers had the answer: build main-stream dams to stop the floods and to store the water. Then This answer to a once seemingly unsolvable prob­ water will be available, stored in man-made reser­ lem hasn't been easy to find, principally because of voirs, for use when man wants it. the complex nature of the river. In solving this problem of seasonal fluctuations, 26- 24- 1 22- ~1'(.!.\l•I•:"' - ,- •: 20- ,- ... •• ., 18- ... Nl'I.IT- ·­ 1:::: • ::::: ,~' ~ . "''""~ 16- ~ . ' i ,-----VIRGIN FLOW STREAMFLOW 14- ,- ..... ~ - ,- \ ii I ~:;: IN MILLION ,.. 12 ACRE FEET - PER YEAR- 10- 11 n1t·1 I Iii IIH j'~ ~~m: ii ~,n i~-IT ~""-··~~~~~~VE a- AVERAGE OF VIRGIN FLOW 6- (PLOTTED AT END OF YE AR) 4- 2 - 4 0,.. .,,. .. .. ... ii" 'M - -.---------., '4 1t 1t----..------,.r Q 'Ii '1i 'U .,. --...-------.,_ 'M 11 1M 'fl ·411 ·,i IMf ... •, , ... --...MO l~s lffl - -- -iito--------U - ~J 'Ii-----.- ilii~t "'it'N--.-----.. -'if ... .. 'ii V ·« - ~ WATER YEAR 0 ,n I ,n !!! ; §!? ~ ~ ,n ~ ~ !!! !!! ,n ~ ~ i i i !!! ...... .....__ ,..-- "'!- ,. the planners had the answer to a second problem as control, the main-stream dams also create power for well. man's use from a renewable resource. After that it This problem was one of annual stream fluctua­ still can be put to beneficial consumptive use- for tion. In addition to jumping from high to low flow irrigating farms, for communities and for industries. as seasons change, the Colorado has its yearly ups Power, like water, is needed in the West, and the and downs, and they are drastic. In 191 7, nearly 22 people of the West are willing to pay for both water million acre-feet of water flowed from the Upper and power. Basin to the Lower Basin. In 1934 only 4.4 million This payment by the people makes the project acre-feet reached the division point between the two possible. basins. It means that the people who use the water and The main-stream dams will level off the seasonal power pay for the project. fluctuations and the yearly variations. The main-stream dams are wonderfully-con­ The main-stream dams are the key units of the ceived units because they perform multiple func­ Colorado River Storage Project. tions: they control the river, make possible the use While performing the functions of regulation and of its water, and create power. HYDROGRAPH OF COLORADO RIVER BELOW HOOVER DAM ~ Ill II. 0 ~ 100,000 0 Ill ·E D Ul r ,C' ~1 IJL A :!:: 80,000 I,_ Ill C) 60,000 a: ,( ::c 0 Ul 40,000 i5 > ..I 20.000 ~ ~ ~ If ,, . ... II vu· < ~ .. ~~ 0 .... ,.,, u ... ~ .I I ,(z 0 I I Ill :E JAN. FEB, MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. 1949 5 the United States. This is in addition to the many ~ other direct and indirect benefits. ADDITIONAL PROFITS AFTER REPAYMENT The Project as proposed will cost less than $760,- $15-$20 MILLION EACH YEAR FOREVER ! 000,000 to construct. More than 99 per cent of the PROFIT IN EXCESS OF costs will be repaid by the people who benefit most ORIGINAL INVESTMENT DURING REPAYMENT PERIOD directly. $275,000,000 That portion which won't be repaid direct­ ly is non-reimbursable because of recreational and STORAGE UNITS GLEN CANYON flood control features which traditionally, and by FLAMING GORGE NAVAJO law, are borne by the nation as a whole.
Recommended publications
  • Imperial Dam/All American Canal Projects Update-2021
    Imperial Dam/All American Canal Projects Update-2021 David Escobar General Superintendent, Operations & Maintenance AAC/River Division May 19, 2021 www.iid.com www.iid.com 2 www.iid.com 3 Executive Summary • Imperial Dam is primarily a concrete slab and buttress structure on the Colorado River located approximately 18 northeast of Yuma, Arizona. The Dam was constructed between 1936 and 1938 by Reclamation to impound water for irrigation. • The Dam’s overall length is approximately 3,479 feet. The sections of the Dam consist of the California abutment, the All American Canal (AAC) Headworks, the California Sluiceway, the overflow weir (spillway) section, the Gila Canal Headworks, and the Arizona abutment. www.iid.com 4 Projects List • Imperial Dam Roller Gates 1 through 4 Overhaul completed in 2018, total project cost-$2,955,900 • Imperial and Laguna Dams Electrical Upgrade Project completed in 2018, total project cost-$20,940,977 • Imperial Dam Sluiceway Gate Replacement Project completed in 2019, total project cost-$3,132,200 • Imperial Dam Concrete Repairs 2019, total project costs- $823,954 www.iid.com 5 Projects List • Imperial Dam Desilting Basin Clarifier Valve Replacement Project will be completed in 2021, total project cost- $1,985,200 • Senator Wash Units 1, through 6 Rewind Stator and Pump Refurbishment 2019-2021, total project cost-$2,145,800 • Gila Headworks Trunnion Repair Project 2021-2022, estimated project costs-$4,156,635 • Gila Headworks Gate Replacement 2021-2022, estimated project costs-$2,900,000 www.iid.com 6 Projects List • Pilot Knob Wasteway/Spill Gate Replacement Project will be completed in 2021, project costs-$1,861,600 • Imperial Dam Desilting Basins Sludge Pipe Replacement Project 2022, estimated project costs-$15,000,000 • Gila Gravity Main Canal Unused Radial Gates Permanent Closure Project 2022, estimated project costs-$2,900,000 www.iid.com 7 Questions? www.iid.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2 UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 355 South 400 East • Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • 801-531-1150 • www.ucrcommission.com June 1, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Biden: The Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission, as required by Article VIII(d)(13) of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 (“Compact”), is enclosed. The report also has been transmitted to the Governors of each state signatory to the Compact, which include Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona. The budget of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2021 (July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021) is included in this report as Appendix B. Respectfully yours, Amy I. Haas Executive Director and Secretary Enclosure 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................. 8 COMMISSIONERS .................................................................................... 9 ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS ........................................................... 10 OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION ....................................................... 10 COMMISSION STAFF ............................................................................. 10 COMMITTEES ......................................................................................... 11 LEGAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Flow Advisory
    River Flow Advisory Bureau . of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Salt Lake City, Utah Vol. 15, No. 1 September 1984 River flows in the Upper Colorado River drainage, still high for this time of year, are not expected to decrease much for several weeks: While the daily update of operations and releases has been discontinued, the toll-free numbers now provide updates on Bureau of Reclamation activities and projects. Utah residents may call 1-800-624-1094 and out-of-Utah residents may call 1-800-624-5099. Colorado River at Westwater Canyon The flow of the Colorado River on September 10 was 7, 000 cfs, and is expected to decrease slightly over the next few weeks. Cataract Canyon Includin2 the Green- River The flow was 11,500 cfs on September 10 and will continue to decrease slightly. Lake Powell Lake Powell's elevation on September 10 was 3,699. Assuming normal inflow for this time of year, the lake should continue to go down slowly to elevation 3,682 by next spring. Colorado River through Grand Canyon . Releases through Glen Canyon Dam remain at 25,000 cfs. These releases are expected to be maintained with no daily fluctuations in river flows. Upper Green River - Fontenelle Reservoir Fontenelle Reservoir is now at elevation 6,482 feet. Releases through the dam will be reduced to about 600 cfs starting on September 17 for about 2 weeks during powerplant maintenance. Green River Flows Below Flaming Gorge Dam On September 10 Flaming Gorge Reservoir was at elevation 6,039.9 feet. Releases from the dam are expected to average 2, 500 cfs in September and October with usual daily fluctuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Etched Magazine, January 2015 Issue
    MAGAZINE ([SHULHQFH7KH6RXWKZHVWFRP OUTDOOR Finding Common Ground 2015 PRESERVATION &2//$%25$7,21RECREATION $3.95 U.S. #theevolutionofelan Finding Common Ground PRESERVATION&2//$%25$7,21 RECREATION contents options art lovers a conversation with greg istock 18 creating art, music, and life in abstracts the art of interior design 22 artisans who bring function and style to life the allure of watercolor 26 an historical perspective through the eyes (and brush) of roland lee soul searchers the dark night of the soul 30 a space in time where new life begins let’s try some civility 32 the longing for meaningful (and civil) conversation adventure in wellness 34 a “dream” vacation that truly benefits mind, body, and soul adventure seekers the day we set the colorado river free 41 a grand experiment in ecological restoration boots and burgers 50 a deliciously novel hiking and dining guide concrete to canyons 58 when inner city students step foot into zion desert dwellers building ice age park 62 a prehistoric venture takes shape in urban style story keepers 66 expectations historic structures: in every issue the mouthpiece of history the green that turned golden 70 etched in time 8 the 50th anniversary of leaving their mark 10 dixie red hills golf course #theevolutionofelan 12 experiencethesouthwest.com 13 saving an oasis 74 meditations 14 the collaboration of preservation snapshots 92 and recreation in southern utah culture creators the hills are alive 80 a journey through the years of making music on our cover community arts and Writer, Rowan Jacobsen events information 84 Photography By: Fred Phillips the people, the places, the dates, the vibe...the culture of southern utah leaving their mark FINDING COMMON GROUND EXPERIENCE volume 9 – issue 1 ENJOY THE OUTDOOR ISSUE AWARENESS EDUCATE 2015 PRESERVE Darci Hansen Founder Editor in Chief │ │ Laurie James Design Editor ROWAN JACOBSEN writes about place and how it shapes ecosystems, │ │ cultures, cuisines, and us.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role
    Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role Updated March 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45546 SUMMARY R45546 Management of the Colorado River: Water March 21, 2019 Allocation, Drought, and the Federal Role Charles V. Stern The Colorado River Basin covers more than 246,000 square miles in seven U.S. states Specialist in Natural (Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California) and Resources Policy Mexico. Pursuant to federal law, the Bureau of Reclamation (part of the Department of the Interior) manages much of the basin’s water supplies. Colorado River water is used Pervaze A. Sheikh primarily for agricultural irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, but it also Specialist in Natural is important for power production, fish and wildlife, and recreational uses. Resources Policy In recent years, consumptive uses of Colorado River water have exceeded natural flows. This causes an imbalance in the basin’s available supplies and competing demands. A drought in the basin dating to 2000 has raised the prospect of water delivery curtailments and decreased hydropower production, among other things. In the future, observers expect that increasing demand for supplies, coupled with the effects of climate change, will further increase the strain on the basin’s limited water supplies. River Management The Law of the River is the commonly used shorthand for the multiple laws, court decisions, and other documents governing Colorado River operations. The foundational document of the Law of the River is the Colorado River Compact of 1922. Pursuant to the compact, the basin states established a framework to apportion the water supplies between the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, with the dividing line between the two basins at Lee Ferry, AZ (near the Utah border).
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Irrigation District Final EIS/EIR
    Contents Contents Section Page Preface/Abstract.................................................................................................................................iii List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................xv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. xxi Acronyms.......................................................................................................................................xxvii Glossary ..........................................................................................................................................xxxv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................ES-1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Background and History...................................................................................ES-2 Project Overview .............................................................................................................ES-3 Project Purpose, Need, and Objectives ........................................................................ES-6 Other Proposed Agreements, Plans, and Projects Related to Resources Affected by the Proposed Project..........................................................................ES-9
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study 2006
    NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY NAVAJO RESERVOIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84138 Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page ii NAVAJO RESERVOIR AND SAN JUAN RIVER TEMPERATURE STUDY PREPARED FOR: SAN JUAN RIVER ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAM BY: Amy Cutler U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Regional Office FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 ii Navajo Reservoir and San Juan River Temperature Study Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3 2. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................5 3. MODELING OVERVIEW .......................................................................................6 4. RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODELING ......................................................7 5. RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING...............................................................14 6. UNSTEADY RIVER TEMPERATURE MODELING........................................18 7. ADDRESSING RESERVOIR SCENARIOS USING CE-QUAL-W2................23 7.1 Base Case Scenario............................................................................................23 7.2 TCD Scenarios...................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • ATTACHMENT B Dams and Reservoirs Along the Lower
    ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT B Dams and Reservoirs Along the Lower Colorado River This attachment to the Colorado River Interim Surplus Criteria DEIS describes the dams and reservoirs on the main stream of the Colorado River from Glen Canyon Dam in Arizona to Morelos Dam along the international boundary with Mexico. The role that each plays in the operation of the Colorado River system is also explained. COLORADO RIVER INTERIM SURPLUS CRITERIA DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COLORADO RIVER DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Lake Powell to Morelos Dam The following discussion summarizes the dams and reservoirs along the Colorado River from Lake Powell to the Southerly International Boundary (SIB) with Mexico and their specific roles in the operation of the Colorado River. Individual dams serve one or more specific purposes as designated in their federal construction authorizations. Such purposes are, water storage, flood control, river regulation, power generation, and water diversion to Arizona, Nevada, California, and Mexico. The All-American Canal is included in this summary because it conveys some of the water delivered to Mexico and thereby contributes to the river system operation. The dams and reservoirs are listed in the order of their location along the river proceeding downstream from Lake Powell. Their locations are shown on the map attached to the inside of the rear cover of this report. Glen Canyon Dam – Glen Canyon Dam, which formed Lake Powell, is a principal part of the Colorado River Storage Project. It is a concrete arch dam 710 feet high and 1,560 feet wide. The maximum generating discharge capacity is 33,200 cfs which may be augmented by an additional 15,000 cfs through the river outlet works.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm.Pre Film 1963-09-24.Pdf (216.9Kb)
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLPJ.AATION Peterson - Interior 4662 WATE For Release SEPTEMBER 24, 1963 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION TO PREMIERE NEW~~IN NEVADA DURING PRESIDENT'S VISIT The world premiere of the Bureau ~lamation's new documentary motion held in- Las-Vegas, Nev .. -,--durin President Kennedy's visit there September 28, the Department of the Interior announced today. The 13!-minute 16 mm. color-and-sound film will be shown on a large screen in the Las Vegas Convention Center rotunda immediately preceding the President's address. On his way to Las Vegas during his conservation tour, the President will fly over nearby Hoover Dam, pioneer Reclamation multipurpose structure, and its reservoir, Lake Mead, for an aerial inspection. The dam and reservoir, along with Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Powell, 370 miles upstream, are featured in the film. "Clear Water on the Colorado 11 presents spectacular scenes of the once-muddy and almost inaccessible Colorado River in the canyons of Arizona and southern Utah, now desilted and cleared by Glen Canyon Dam which began storing water March 13, 1963. The film portrays the miracle of a silt-free Colorado River between the headwaters of Lake Mead and the headwaters of Lake Powell. The film points out that Glen Canyon Dam--topped out September 13, 1963, has desilted and cleared the Colorado River just as did Hoover Dam downstream 28 years ago. A tremendous load of sediment, varying from 24 to 270 million tons in different years, has been deposited at the head of Lake Mead since Hoover Dam was closed in 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • 1976 Link Is to a PDF File
    t • I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SCALE OF MILES Annual Report Operation of the Colorado· River Basin 1976 Projected Operations 1977 u.s. Department of the Interior Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary Bureau of Reclamation Gilbert G. Stamm, Commissioner January 1977 Table·of Contents Introduction ii Authority for ·Report ii Actual .Operations under Criteria-Water Year 1976 1 Upper Basin Reservoirs 2 Lo~er Bas1nReservoirs __ ------------------------------~------------ 14 River Regulations 20 Beneficial Consumptive Uses 21 Upper Basin Uses 21 Lo~er Basin Uses and· Losses 21 Water Quality Control 22 Water Quality Operations during Water Year 1976 22 Enhancement of Fish and Wildlife 23 Upper Basin 23 Lo~erBasin 23 Preservation· of Environment 24 Projected Plan of Operation under Criteria for Current Year ~------------------------------------------__ 26 Determination Storage" 26 Lower Basin Requirements 27 Plan of Operation-Water Year 1977 29 Upper Basin Reservoirs 30 Lo~er Basin Reservoirs 31 (Prepared pursuant to the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968, Public Law 90-537) Intr cti The operation of the Colorado River Basin during the past year and the projected operation for the current year reflect domestic use, irrigation, hydro­ electric power generation, water quality control, fish and wi Idl ife propagation, recreation, flood control, and Colorado River Compact require­ ments. Storage and release of water from the Upper Basin reservoirs recognize all applicable laws and relevant factors governing the Colorado River, in­ cluding the impoundment of water in the Upper Basin required by section 602(a) of Public Law 90-537. The operation of the Lower Basin reser­ voirs reflects Mexican Treaty obligations and Lower Basin contractual commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of the River the Colorado River Compact
    Colorado River Water Users Association: Law of the River . The Colorado River Compact . As the 20th century dawned, the The Colorado River Compact vast domain of the Colorado River lay almost entirely Boulder Canyon Project Act untouched. Though there had been a few early filings for Treaty with Mexico diversion and a "grand ditch" conveying water some 16 miles across the Continental Divide Upper Colorado River Basin into eastern Colorado in the late Compact of 1948 1800s, California's Imperial Valley was among the first areas to tap the river's true potential. In early 1901, the 60 mile long Alamo Canal, Colorado River Storage Project developed by private concerns, was completed to deliver Colorado Act River water for irrigation, and a wasteland was transformed. But the Imperial Valley did not move ahead without problems. About 50 miles Grand Canyon Protection Act of the canal coursed through Mexico, leaving the valley farmers at the mercy of a foreign government. And in 1905, the river, raging with Arizona vs. California floods, eroded the opening to the canal, roared through and created the Salton Sea before the river was pushed back into its normal channel. Future of Western Water With the constant threat of flood looming along the lower Colorado, demands grew for some sort of permanent flood control work -a storage reservoir and dam on the river. And Imperial Valley farmers called for a canal totally within the United States, free of Mexican interference. By 1919, Imperial Irrigation District had won the support of the federal Bureau of Reclamation. A bureau engineering board recommended favorably on the canal and added the government "should undertake the early construction of a storage reservoir on the drainage basin of the Colorado." While this report was greeted with enthusiasm by people along the river's lower stretches, it was viewed with alarm by those in upper reaches.
    [Show full text]