DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling Human Cortical Development in Vitro Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling Human Cortical Development in Vitro Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Modeling human cortical development in vitro using induced pluripotent stem cells Jessica Mariania,b, Maria Vittoria Simoninia,b, Dean Palejeva,b, Livia Tomasinia,b, Gianfilippo Coppolaa,b, Anna M. Szekelya,c,d, Tamas L. Horvathe, and Flora M. Vaccarinoa,b,f,1 aProgram in Neurodevelopment and Regeneration, bChild Study Center, and Departments of cGenetics, dNeurology, eComparative Medicine, and fNeurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Edited* by Pasko Rakic, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved June 11, 2012 (received for review February 21, 2012) Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are emerging as described method for neural differentiation that allows formation a tool for understanding human brain development at cellular, of serum-free, floating embryoid body-like, quick aggregates molecular, and genomic levels. Here we show that hiPSCs grown (SFEBq) (16) we derived neurally differentiated SFEBq-like in suspension in the presence of rostral neuralizing factors can multilayered structures from hiPSC. We also performed detailed generate 3D structures containing polarized radial glia, interme- immunophenotyping of these cultures, analyzed their tran- diate progenitors, and a spectrum of layer-specific cortical neurons scriptome, and compared it with transcriptomes of hESCs, hiPSCs, reminiscent of their organization in vivo. The hiPSC-derived mul- human neuronal progenitors, and developing human brain tissue. tilayered structures express a gene expression profile typical of These combined analyses demonstrate that hiPSC-derived multi- layered structures display a gene expression profile typical of the the embryonic telencephalon but not that of other CNS regions. embryonic telencephalon, and that neurons within these structures Their transcriptome is highly enriched in transcription factors encompass both lower and upper cortical layer fates. controlling the specification, growth, and patterning of the dorsal telencephalon and displays highest correlation with that of the Results early human cerebral cortical wall at 8–10 wk after conception. Characterization of hiPSC Lines. We used two hiPSC lines: PGP1-1 Thus, hiPSC are capable of enacting a transcriptional program (17) and i03-01#9, a line derived in our laboratory. Both lines specifying human telencephalic (pallial) development. This model were established from healthy control adult male skin fibroblasts will allow the study of human brain development as well as dis- through retroviral reprogramming vectors expressing OCT4, NEUROSCIENCE orders of the human cerebral cortex. SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC (18). These hiPSC lines exhibited typical hESC morphology and expressed canonical pluripotency human embryonic stem cell | embryo | differentiation | cortical layer markers by immunocytochemistry as well as NANOG, DNMT3B, and other endogenous mRNAs that characterize pluripotent merging data highlight the complexity and dynamic nature of cells (Fig. S1 A and B). Pairwise correlations of global gene ex- Egene expression in the central nervous system (CNS) and the pression data obtained by microarrays (Dataset S1) showed high divergence between human and other mammalian species, which is similarity in gene expression between PGP1-1 and the hESC line especially pronounced in the developing brain (1–4). Exploring H1 (Pearson’s r > 0.978), i03-01#9 and H1 (Pearson’s r > 0.975), ’ > such differences may reveal the genetic underpinnings of the larger and PGP1-1 and i03-01#9 (Pearson s r 0.979). size and complex architecture of the human brain and elucidate the We then tested the hiPSC lines with Pluritest (http://www. fi molecular and cellular substrates of higher cognitive functions, as pluritest.org), an approach that classi es samples according to fi well as of our vulnerability to neurodevelopmental and neurode- more than 450 genome-wide transcriptional pro les, including generative disorders. To understand the genetic programs that 223 hESC and 41 hiPSC lines from multiple laboratories (19). drive cell specification and differentiation in the human brain, it is The i03-01#9 and PGP1-1 displayed Pluritest scores consistent important to develop model systems that recapitulate dynamic with normal human pluripotent cells and clustered together with the H1 hESC line (green arrowhead, Fig. S1D). Taken together, aspects of neural development, in addition to making inferences fi fi from commonly used models of lower mammalian species. these results con rm that PGP1-1 and i03-01#9 ful ll the Recapitulating human neural development in vitro using human established criteria for completely reprogrammed iPSC lines. induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can provide our first un- derstanding of how genetic variation and disease-causing muta- Excitatory Neuronal Precursor Cells Are Generated Within Multilayered tions influence neural development. Human iPSCs generated from Structures Derived from hiPSCs. Undifferentiated PGP1-1 and i03- 01#9 colonies were dissociated into single cells and cultured in reprogrammed cells can be differentiated into any tissue, including – the CNS, while maintaining the genetic background of the in- suspension in the presence of FGF2 (5 20 ng/mL) and inhibitors of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), Wnt/β-catenin, and dividual of origin. These critical features have been exploited to β model monogenic forms of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as TGF- /activin/nodal pathways to induce forebrain fate. The resulting 3D aggregates were then transferred onto a coated surface Rett and Timothy syndromes, and even psychiatric disorders with – complex inheritance, such as schizophrenia (5–7). and maintained without any additional factors until day 45 70. On The brain and spinal cord develop according to distinct dif- day 25, cells within the SFEBq-like structures expressed early ferentiation programs from the earliest stages of CNS develop- neuroepithelial markers, including BLBP, N-CADHERIN, PAX6, ment (i.e., at the progenitor stage during gastrulation) (8, 9). and NESTIN (Fig. S1C). Regional differences in gene expression within stem and pro- genitor cells appear at the onset of the formation of both mouse (10, 11) and human CNS, as shown by recent studies of the human Author contributions: J.M., A.M.S., and F.M.V. designed research; J.M., M.V.S., L.T., and transcriptome using postmortem tissue (4). T.L.H. performed research; J.M., M.V.S., D.P., L.T., G.C., and F.M.V. analyzed data; and J.M., M.V.S., A.M.S., and F.M.V. wrote the paper. Neural cells are thought to differentiate by “default” into an fl anterior, forebrain-like fate (12), and indeed monolayer neuronal The authors declare no con ict of interest. cultures derived from hiPSCs and human embryonic stem cells *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. (hESCs) can express some forebrain markers (6, 13, 14). However, Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. they have not yet been shown to recapitulate the transcriptional 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fl[email protected]. program that gives rise to the mammalian telencephalon, and This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. their regional specification remains unclear (15). Using a recently 1073/pnas.1202944109/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1202944109 PNAS Early Edition | 1of7 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 hindbrain (Fig. 1 P and Q). Additionally, cells did not express ISLET1 and showed barely detectable levels of OLIG2 (Fig. 1R), TFs both expressed by more posterior and ventral regions of the brain and in the spinal cord. We next investigated the potential of these 3D multilayered aggregates to generate inhibitory neurons. On day 50 of neuronal differentiation, we found presence of GABAergic precursor cells (DLX1/2+, MASH1+) as well as more differentiated GAD-67+ inhibitory neurons (Fig. S3). Strongly positive DLX+ cells ten- ded to be rounded and devoid of GAD-67+ processes (Fig. S3B, arrowheads), whereas cells weakly stained for DLX acquired long GAD-67+ processes (Fig. S3 A and C, arrows) and seemed to be migrating within the structure. Importantly, cells positive for inhibitory markers did not express the excitatory neuronal marker TBR1, suggesting that excitatory and inhibitory neuronal lineages are distinct and coexist in the preparation. The GABAergic component was always segregated from excitatory cells, in the center (Fig. S3A) or at the periphery (Fig. S3 D–F). The overall Fig. 1. Radial glia and excitatory progenitors differentiate from hiPSCs at day 50 in vitro. Day-50 forebrain-like structures contain radial glial cells immunoreactive for NESTIN, PAX6, and BLBP (A, B, and E), and βIIITUBULIN+ and TBR1+ neurons (B, D, and G). The radial glia express SOX1 and SOX2 (H–L), are mitotically active, as shown by Ki67 expression (M–O, red), and are polarized, displaying N-CADHERIN+ apical end-feet (C and F) as well as apical mitoses (M–O, arrowheads). A layer of TBR2+ intermediate progenitors (C and F) surrounds the radial glial layer and displays pH3+ basal mitoses (M–O, arrows). The neurons express MAP2 but rarely ZIC1 (P and Q) and do not express ISLET1 and OLIG2 (R). (Scale bars, 200 μminA–D and M;5μminE–G and I;10μminH, J–L, N, and O.) Immunofluorescence analysis of the 3D structures at day 45– 50 in serial cryosections revealed neural tube-like substructures within each aggregate, composed of radially arranged cells with apico-basal polarity, organized around a central lumen (Fig. 1). The radially arranged cells were PAX6+, NESTIN+, BLBP+, and GFAP+ and displayed N-CADHERIN immunoreactivity along their apical edge (Fig. 1 A–C, E, and F and Fig. S2 A–C). These radial glia-like progenitors expressed the neuroepithelial transcription factors (TFs) SOX1 and SOX2 (Fig. 1 H–L). Su- perficially to the radial glial layer were numerous neuronal precursor cells expressing T-box brain 2 (TBR2) (Fig. 1 C and F), a TF expressed by intermediate neuronal progenitors in the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the mammalian cerebral cortex Fig. 2. Evidence for synapses in hiPSC-derived multilayered structures at (20).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sonic Hedgehog-Gli1 Signaling and Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein 1 Gene Regulation in Motor Neuron Differentiation and Diseases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Sonic Hedgehog-Gli1 Signaling and Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein 1 Gene Regulation in Motor Neuron Differentiation and Diseases Yu-Lung Lin y, Yi-Wei Lin y, Jennifer Nhieu y, Xiaoyin Zhang and Li-Na Wei * Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; [email protected] (Y.-L.L.); [email protected] (Y.-W.L.); [email protected] (J.N.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-612-6259402 Contributed equally. y Received: 29 April 2020; Accepted: 7 June 2020; Published: 9 June 2020 Abstract: Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1 (CRABP1) is highly expressed in motor neurons. Degenerated motor neuron-like MN1 cells are engineered by introducing SODG93A or AR-65Q to model degenerated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or spinal bulbar muscular atrophy neurons. Retinoic acid (RA)/sonic hedgehog (Shh)-induced embryonic stem cells differentiation into motor neurons are employed to study up-regulation of Crabp1 by Shh. In SODG93A or AR-65Q MN1 neurons, CRABP1 level is reduced, revealing a correlation of motor neuron degeneration with Crabp1 down-regulation. Up-regulation of Crabp1 by Shh is mediated by glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (Gli1) that binds the Gli target sequence in Crabp10s neuron-specific regulatory region upstream of minimal promoter. Gli1 binding triggers chromatin juxtaposition with minimal promoter, activating transcription. Motor neuron differentiation and Crabp1 up-regulation are both inhibited by blunting Shh with Gli inhibitor GANT61. Expression data mining of ALS and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) motor neurons shows reduced CRABP1, coincided with reduction in Shh-Gli1 signaling components.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Gas1 Down-Regulation in Mitogenic Stimulation of Quiescent NIH3T3 Cells by V-Src
    Oncogene (1998) 17, 1629 ± 1638 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/onc Role of Gas1 down-regulation in mitogenic stimulation of quiescent NIH3T3 cells by v-Src Milena Grossi1, S Anna La Rocca1, Gloria Pierluigi1, Serena Vannucchi1, Elisabetta M Ruaro2, Claudio Schneider2 and Franco TatoÁ 1 1Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare e dello Sviluppo, UniversitaÁ di Roma `La Sapienza', Vie degli Apuli, 100185-Roma, Italy and 2Laboratorio Nazionale Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Biotecnologie, 34012-Trieste, Italy Quiescent mammalian ®broblasts can be induced to re- interfering with the early serum response (Del Sal et enter the cell cycle by growth factors and oncoproteins. al., 1992). Gas1-induced growth arrest appears to be We studied the pathway(s) through which v-Src, the mediated by p53, with no requirement for its sequence- oncogenic tyrosine kinase encoded by the v-src oncogene speci®c transactivating function (Del Sal et al., 1995). of Rous sarcoma virus, forces serum-starved NIH3T3 Ample evidence documents that positive signalling cells to enter S-phase. To this purpose, we isolated and from growth factors and oncogene products very often characterized a polyclonal population of NIH3T3 cells involves the activation of a major biochemical pathway transformed by the MR31 retroviral vector, encoding known as the Ras-pathway (Kazlauskas, 1994; Mar- G418 resistance and the v-src temperature-sensitive allele shall, 1994; McCormick, 1994; Schlessinger, 1994). In from the mutant ts LA31 PR-A. NIH(MR31) cells order to activate this pathway, ultimately leading to S- displayed a temperature-conditional transformed pheno- phase entry, transduction of signals generated at the type and could be made quiescent by serum deprivation cell membrane is needed and performed by adaptor at the restrictive temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Thin Spines Learn to Be Mushroom Spines That Remember? Jennifer Bourne and Kristen M Harris
    CONEUR-488; NO OF PAGES 6 Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember? Jennifer Bourne and Kristen M Harris Dendritic spines are the primary site of excitatory input on most or whether they instead switch shapes depending on principal neurons. Long-lasting changes in synaptic activity are synaptic plasticity during learning. accompanied by alterations in spine shape, size and number. The responsiveness of thin spines to increases and decreases Maturation and stabilization of spines in synaptic activity has led to the suggestion that they are Spines tend to stabilize with maturation [5]; however, a ‘learning spines’, whereas the stability of mushroom spines small proportion continues to turnover in more mature suggests that they are ‘memory spines’. Synaptic brains [5–7]. The transient spines are thin spines that enhancement leads to an enlargement of thin spines into emerge and disappear over a few days, whereas mush- mushroom spines and the mobilization of subcellular resources room spines can persist for months [5,6]. Mushroom to potentiated synapses. Thin spines also concentrate spines have larger postsynaptic densities (PSDs) [1], biochemical signals such as Ca2+, providing the synaptic which anchor more AMPA glutamate receptors and make specificity required for learning. Determining the mechanisms these synapses functionally stronger [8–12]. Mushroom that regulate spine morphology is essential for understanding spines are more likely than thin spines to contain smooth the cellular changes that underlie learning and memory. endoplasmic reticulum, which can regulate Ca2+ locally [13], and spines that have larger synapses are also more Addresses Center for Learning and Memory, Department of Neurobiology, likely to contain polyribosomes for local protein synthesis University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-0805, USA [14].
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrointestinal Defects of the Gas1 Mutant Involve Dysregulated Hedgehog and Ret Signaling
    144 Research Article Gastrointestinal defects of the Gas1 mutant involve dysregulated Hedgehog and Ret signaling Sandrine Biau1,2,*, Shiying Jin1,* and Chen-Ming Fan1,` 1Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 3520 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA 22iE Foundation, International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering, Rue de la Science, 01 BP 594, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso *These authors contributed equally to this work `Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Biology Open 2, 144–155 doi: 10.1242/bio.20123186 Received 24th September 2012 Accepted 2nd October 2012 Summary The gastrointestinal (GI) tract defines the digestive system and in the GI tract. Because Gas1 has been shown to inhibit Ret is composed of the stomach, intestine and colon. Among the signaling elicited by Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor major cell types lining radially along the GI tract are the (Gdnf), we explored whether Gas1 mutant enteric neurons epithelium, mucosa, smooth muscles and enteric neurons. displayed any alteration of Ret signaling levels. Indeed, isolated The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway has been implicated in directing mutant enteric progenitors not only showed increased levels of various aspects of the developing GI tract, notably the mucosa phospho-Ret and its downstream effectors, phospho-Akt and and smooth muscle growth, and enteric neuron patterning, phospho-Erk, but also displayed altered responses to Gdnf and while the Ret signaling pathway is selectively required for Shh. We therefore conclude that phenotypes observed in the enteric neuron migration, proliferation, and differentiation. The Gas1 mutant are due to a combination of reduced Hh signaling growth arrest specific gene 1 (Gas1) encodes a GPI-anchored and increased Ret signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Roles of Sonic Hedgehog in the Developing Human Cortex Are Suggested by Its Widespread Distribution
    Brain Structure and Function https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1621-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Multiple roles of Sonic Hedgehog in the developing human cortex are suggested by its widespread distribution Fani Memi1,3 · Nada Zecevic1 · Nevena Radonjić2 Received: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 25 January 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication Abstract Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) plays an instrumental role in brain development, fine-tuning processes such as cell proliferation, patterning, and fate specification. Although, mutations in the SHH pathway in humans are associated with various neurode- velopmental disorders, ranging from holoprosencephaly to schizophrenia, its expression pattern in the developing human brain is not well established. We now determined the previously not reported wide expression of SHH in the human fetal cerebral cortex during most of the gestation period (10–40 gestational weeks). This spatiotemporal distribution puts Shh in a position to influence the fundamental processes involved in corticogenesis. SHH expression increased during development, shifting from progenitor cells in the proliferative zones to neurons, both glutamatergic and GABAergic, and astrocytes in upper cortical compartments. Importantly, the expression of its downstream effectors and complementary receptors revealed evolutionary differences inSHH -pathway gene expression between humans and rodents. Keywords Cerebral cortex · Human fetal brain · Morphogen · SHH receptors Introduction generally well conserved in mammals, a number of changes and novelties have emerged during evolution that may Corticogenesis is a developmental process that requires underlie the biological basis for the higher cognitive and coordination of the signaling pathways providing mitogenic motor abilities that are specific to humans (Geschwind and signals and guiding the regulation of symmetric/asymmetric Rakic 2013; Silbereis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas1 Is a Receptor for Sonic Hedgehog to Repel Enteric Axons
    Gas1 is a receptor for sonic hedgehog to repel PNAS PLUS enteric axons Shiying Jina, David C. Martinellia,1, Xiaobin Zhenga, Marc Tessier-Lavigneb, and Chen-Ming Fana,2 aDepartment of Embryology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, MD 21218; and bRockefeller University, New York, NY 10065 Edited by Kathryn V. Anderson, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY, and approved November 26, 2014 (received for review September 26, 2014) The myenteric plexus of the enteric nervous system controls the neurons (1, 2). Germ-line and endoderm-specific conditional mouse movement of smooth muscles in the gastrointestinal system. They mutants for Shh and/or Ihh display reduced mesenchyme and extend their axons between two peripheral smooth muscle layers smooth muscle mass (6, 8). Shh and Ihh directly act on the gut to form a tubular meshwork arborizing the gut wall. How a tubular mesoderm, as inactivation of smoothened (Smo), the obligatory Hh axonal meshwork becomes established without invading centrally signaling component, in gut mesoderm causes the same defect (8). toward the gut epithelium has not been addressed. We provide Mice mutant for growth arrest specific gene 1 (Gas1), which encodes evidence here that sonic hedgehog (Shh) secreted from the gut an Hh surface binding receptor (9, 10), also share this defect (11). epithelium prevents central projections of enteric axons, thereby The role of Hh signaling in enteric neuron development is less forcing their peripheral tubular distribution. Exclusion of enteric defined. Shh mutant intestines contained more punctuated Tuj1 central projections by Shh requires its binding partner growth (an antibody recognizing neuronal βΙΙΙ-tubulin) staining signals er- arrest specific gene 1 (Gas1) and its signaling component smooth- roneously located near the base of the villi and were interpreted to ened (Smo) in enteric neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Wide Shrna Screen Identifies GAS1 As a Novel Melanoma Metastasis Suppressor Gene
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press A genome-wide shRNA screen identifies GAS1 as a novel melanoma metastasis suppressor gene Stephane Gobeil,1 Xiaochun Zhu,1 Charles J. Doillon,2 and Michael R. Green1,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Programs in Gene Function and Expression and Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA; 2Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, CHUL’s Research Center, CHUQ, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada Metastasis suppressor genes inhibit one or more steps required for metastasis without affecting primary tumor formation. Due to the complexity of the metastatic process, the development of experimental approaches for identifying genes involved in metastasis prevention has been challenging. Here we describe a genome-wide RNAi screening strategy to identify candidate metastasis suppressor genes. Following expression in weakly metastatic B16-F0 mouse melanoma cells, shRNAs were selected based upon enhanced satellite colony formation in a three-dimensional cell culture system and confirmed in a mouse experimental metastasis assay. Using this approach we discovered 22 genes whose knockdown increased metastasis without affecting primary tumor growth. We focused on one of these genes, Gas1 (Growth arrest-specific 1), because we found that it was substantially down-regulated in highly metastatic B16-F10 melanoma cells, which contributed to the high metastatic potential of this mouse cell line. We further demonstrated that Gas1 has all the expected properties of a melanoma tumor suppressor including: suppression of metastasis in a spontaneous metastasis assay, promotion of apoptosis following dissemination of cells to secondary sites, and frequent down-regulation in human melanoma metastasis-derived cell lines and metastatic tumor samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Modular Transport of Postsynaptic Density-95 Clusters and Association with Stable Spine Precursors During Early Development of Cortical Neurons
    The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2001, 21(23):9325–9333 Modular Transport of Postsynaptic Density-95 Clusters and Association with Stable Spine Precursors during Early Development of Cortical Neurons Oliver Prange,1 and Timothy H. Murphy1,2 Kinsmen Laboratory, Departments of 1Psychiatry and 2Physiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3 The properties of filopodia and spines and their association spine membranes can move. Although processes bearing clus- with the postsynaptic density (PSD) protein PSD-95 were stud- ters were generally stable, in 8 DIV neurons, we observed that ied during early development of cultured cortical neurons using a subset (ϳ10%) of PSD-95/GFP clusters underwent rapid time-lapse confocal microscopy. Neurons were transfected modular translocation between filopodia–spines and dendritic with recombinant PSD-95 constructs fused to green fluores- shafts. We conclude that, during early synaptic maturation, cent protein (GFP) for, on average, either 8 d in vitro (DIV) or 14 prefabricated PSD-95 clusters are trafficked in a developmen- DIV. We find that, during 1 hr of imaging, filopodia and spines tally regulated process that is associated with filopodial stabi- bearing PSD-95/GFP clusters are significantly more stable (i.e., lization and synapse formation. do not turnover) than those lacking clusters. When present within a spine precursor, a PSD-95/GFP cluster appeared to Key words: development; dendritic spine; filopodium; gluta- nucleate a relatively stable structure around which filopodium– mate receptor; NMDA receptor; PSD-95 The postsynaptic density (PSD) protein PSD-95 is a founding associated protein) via GK] can tether PSD-95 and its binding member of the growing superfamily of PDZ (PSD-95–Disks partners to the intracellular tubulin and actin lattice, respectively large–zona occludens1/2) domain-containing proteins (Craven (Scannevin and Huganir, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Solution Structure and Biophysical Characterization of the Multifaceted
    Rosti et al. BMC Biochemistry (2015) 16:8 DOI 10.1186/s12858-015-0037-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Solution structure and biophysical characterization of the multifaceted signalling effector protein growth arrest specific-1 Katja Rosti1, Adrian Goldman2,3 and Tommi Kajander1* Abstract Background: The protein growth arrest specific-1 (GAS1) was discovered based on its ability to stop the cell cycle. During development it is involved in embryonic patterning, inhibits cell proliferation and mediates cell death, and has therefore been considered as a tumor suppressor. GAS1 is known to signal through two different cell membrane receptors: Rearranged during transformation (RET), and the sonic hedgehog receptor Patched-1. Sonic Hedgehog signalling is important in stem cell renewal and RET mediated signalling in neuronal survival. Disorders in both sonic hedgehog and RET signalling are connected to cancer progression. The neuroprotective effect of RET is controlled by glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor receptor alphas (GFRαs). Human Growth arrest specific-1 is a distant homolog of the GFRαs. Results: We have produced and purified recombinant human GAS1 protein, and confirmed that GAS1 is a monomer in solution by static light scattering and small angle X-ray scattering analysis. The low resolution solution structure reveals that GAS1 is more elongated and flexible than the GFRαs, and the homology modelling of the individual domains show that they differ from GFRαs by lacking the amino acids for neurotrophic factor binding. In addition, GAS1 hasanextendedloopintheN-terminaldomainthatisconserved in vertebrates after the divergence of fishes and amphibians. Conclusions: We conclude that GAS1 most likely differs from GFRαs functionally, based on comparative structural analysis, while it is able to bind the extracellular part of RET in a neurotrophic factor independent manner, although with low affinity in solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Understanding of Kidney Diseases Associated with WT1 Mutations Lihua Dong1, Stefan Pietsch1 and Christoph Englert1,2
    mini review http://www.kidney-international.org © 2015 International Society of Nephrology OPEN Towards an understanding of kidney diseases associated with WT1 mutations Lihua Dong1, Stefan Pietsch1 and Christoph Englert1,2 1Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute for Age Research, Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany and 2Faculty of Biology and Pharmacy, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany Mutations in Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1)causeawidespectrum Kidney failure is a worldwide public health problem, with of renal manifestations, eventually leading to end-stage increasing incidence and prevalence, high costs, and poor kidney failure. Insufficient understanding of WT1’smolecular outcomes.1 Some of those renal manifestations are caused functions in kidney development has hampered efficient by Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) mutations, including Wilms’ therapeutic applications for WT1-associated diseases. tumor, the Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS), the Frasier Recently, the generation and characterization of mouse syndrome (FS), and the steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. models and application of multiple state-of-the-art To understand WT1 function in kidney development and approaches have significantly expanded our understanding homeostasis, multiple mouse models have been generated and of the molecular mechanisms of how WT1 mutations lead to characterized. Particularly, the generation of Wt1 conditional kidney failure. Here, we discuss the WT1 binding consensus knockout mice crossed to inducible and cell-specific Cre mice and illustrate the
    [Show full text]
  • Gathering at the Nodes
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS GLIA Gathering at the nodes Saltatory conduction — the process by which that are found at the nodes of Ranvier, where action potentials propagate along myelinated they interact with Na+ channels. When the nerves — depends on the fact that voltage- authors either disrupted the localization of gated Na+ channels form clusters at the nodes gliomedin by using a soluble fusion protein of Ranvier, between sections of the myelin that contained the extracellular domain of sheath. New findings from Eshed et al. show neurofascin, or used RNA interference to that Schwann cells produce a protein called suppress the expression of gliomedin, the gliomedin, and that this is responsible for characteristic clustering of Na+ channels at the clustering of these channels. the nodes of Ranvier did not occur. The formation of the nodes of Ranvier is Aggregation of the domain of gliomedin specified by the myelinating cells, not the that binds neurofascin and NrCAM on the axons, and an important component of this surface of purified neurons also caused process in the peripheral nervous system the clustering of neurofascin, Na+ channels is the extension of microvilli by Schwann and other nodal proteins. These findings cells. These microvilli contact the axons at support a model in which gliomedin on the nodes, and it is here that the Schwann References and links Schwann cell microvilli binds to neurofascin ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Eshed, Y. et al. Gliomedin cells express the newly discovered protein and NrCAM on axons, causing them to mediates Schwann cell–axon interaction and the molecular gliomedin. cluster at the nodes of Ranvier, and leading assembly of the nodes of Ranvier.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Consequences of Synapse Remodeling Following Astrocyte-Specific Regulation of Ephrin-B1 in the Adult Hippocampus
    5710 • The Journal of Neuroscience, June 20, 2018 • 38(25):5710–5726 Cellular/Molecular Functional Consequences of Synapse Remodeling Following Astrocyte-Specific Regulation of Ephrin-B1 in the Adult Hippocampus Jordan Koeppen,1,2* XAmanda Q. Nguyen,1,3* Angeliki M. Nikolakopoulou,1 XMichael Garcia,1 XSandy Hanna,1 Simone Woodruff,1 Zoe Figueroa,1 XAndre Obenaus,4 and XIryna M. Ethell1,2,3 1Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California 92521, 2Cell, Molecular, and Developmental Biology Graduate program, University of California Riverside, California, 92521, 3Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, and 4Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92350 Astrocyte-derived factors can control synapse formation and functions, making astrocytes an attractive target for regulating neuronal circuits and associated behaviors. Abnormal astrocyte-neuronal interactions are also implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodegenera- tive diseases associated with impaired learning and memory. However, little is known about astrocyte-mediated mechanisms that regulate learning and memory. Here, we propose astrocytic ephrin-B1 as a regulator of synaptogenesis in adult hippocampus and mouse learning behaviors. We found that astrocyte-specific ablation of ephrin-B1 in male mice triggers an increase in the density of immature dendritic spines and excitatory synaptic sites in the adult CA1 hippocampus. However, the prevalence of immature dendritic spines is associated with decreased evoked postsynaptic firing responses in CA1 pyramidal neurons, suggesting impaired maturation of these newly formed and potentially silent synapses or increased excitatory drive on the inhibitory neurons resulting in the overall decreased postsynaptic firing.
    [Show full text]