Nanotechnologies: a Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nanotechnologies: a Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of A EUROPEAN COMMISSION Community Health and Consumer Protection NANOTECHNOLOGIES: A PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSIS ON THE BASIS OF A WORKSHOP ORGANIZED IN BRUSSELS ON 1–2 MARCH 2004 BY THE HEALTH AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Cover page illustration: The picture on the cover page shows nanoparticles of titanium silicide embedded in silicon (3200Å × 3200Å × 291Å). (Courtesy of Professor Mark E. Welland, Cambridge University.) LEGAL NOTICE: Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The present report may be found under http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/events_risk_en.htm. © European Communities, 2004 2 FOREWORD Nanotechnologies refer to “technologies of the tiny”. They span domains as diverse as computing, material science, medicine, energy production and storage, etc., bring together fields as varied as physics, chemistry, genetics, information and communication technologies, and cognitive sciences, and should become virtually ubiquitous before long. Nanotechnologies are with us already. Indeed, consumers are already being offered products manufactured with nanotechnologies including cosmetics, clothing, and sporting goods. But, while technology and market analysts alike expect the very small to become very big, nanotechnologies are still emerging. Like other new technologies before them, nanotechnologies may not only present potential benefits, but also potential risks. Today therefore constitutes an appropriate time to establish a dialog on nanotechnologies involving scientists, consumers, workers, industrialists, and other stakeholders. Today also represents an opportune moment to reflect on the implications of these “technologies of the tiny” for public health, health and safety at work, and the environment. Today presents us with a unique chance to set nanotechnologies on a responsible development trajectory, one that will benefit both human and environmental health and global competitiveness. The “Mapping out Nano Risks” workshop represents a modest first step—albeit an important one—towards analyzing the potential risks of nanotechnologies and what they may imply. Consequently, I should like to thank all the experts who took part in the workshop for contributing written statements prior to the workshop, for actively participating in the workshop, and for producing this timely report. This report is available under http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/events_risk_en.htm. Risk Assessment Unit Public Health and Risk Assessment Directorate Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD............................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 13 PART 1: WORKSHOP OUTCOMES ................................................................................. 15 1. PRELIMINARY RISK ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 17 1.1. Overview .............................................................................................................. 17 1.1.1 Hazard identification........................................................................................... 17 1.1.1.1 Clarifications ....................................................................................................... 18 1.1.1.2 Concerns.............................................................................................................. 18 1.1.1.2.1 Toxicology and ecotoxicology............................................................................ 18 1.1.1.2.2 Ethics ............................................................................................................... 19 1.1.1.2.3 Security ............................................................................................................... 20 1.1.1.3 Limits .................................................................................................................. 21 1.1.2 Policy options evoked during the meeting .......................................................... 22 1.1.3 Twelve recommendations from experts at the workshop.................................... 24 1.2. Options for future policies identified by the workshop secretariat ...................... 27 2. GENERAL STATEMENT ON NANOTECHNOLOGIES .......................................................... 33 3. CONCEPT NOTE ON A HAZARD TRIGGER ALGORITHM AS A POTENTIAL PRIORITIZATION TOOL FOR USE BY REGULATORS ................................................................................... 35 PART 2: DOCUMENTS PRODUCED AND CIRCULATED PRIOR TO 1 MARCH 2004..................................................................................................................... 37 1. COLLECTION OF SHORT CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE INVITED EXPERTS ............................. 39 Security Problems from Nanotechnology Jürgen Altmann ..................................................................... 39 Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards Short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constitution Alexander Arnall* and Douglass Parr** ....................................... 43 A need for integrated testing of products in Nanotechnology Paul J.A. Borm and Wolfgang Kreyling ... 47 Engineered anomaterials and risks: One perspective Vicki Colvin......................................................... 49 Mapping Out Nano Risks. Some considerations on possible toxicity W.H. de Jong .............................. 51 Complexity and Uncertainty A Prudential Approach To Nanotechnology Jean-Pierre Dupuy................ 71 Nano Ethics Primer Göran Hermerén, ................................................................................................... 95 Nanotechnology - From the insurers' perspective Annabelle R. Hett ................................................... 103 A briefing note on Nanoparticles C.Vyvyan Howard............................................................................ 105 Mapping Out Nano Risks Lutz Mädler.................................................................................................. 109 Social Imagination for Nanotechnology Alfred Nordmann .................................................................... 111 Emerging Concepts in Nanoparticle (NP) Toxicology G. Oberdörster,................................................. 115 “Mapping Out Nano Risks” M.A.Pierotti ............................................................................................... 117 Mapping out Nano Risks Jos Put ......................................................................................................... 119 Public Perception of Nanotechnology Ortwin Renn.............................................................................. 123 Risks and Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnology in Healthcare D.G. Rickerby................................... 127 5 Towards an appropriate corporate and public governance of Nano Risks : Promoting and strengthening a multilateral approach Françoise Roure............................................... 131 Nanotechnology and its implications M E Welland.............................................................................. 135 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE................................................................................................. 137 3. AGENDA ...................................................................................................................... 143 6 LIST OF WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS THE EXPERT GROUP Dr Jürgen ALTMANN1 Institut für Exp. Physik III Ruhr-Universität Bochum Bochum,Germany and Experimentelle Physik III Universität Dortmund Mr Alexander Huw ARNALL Department of Geography University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK Prof. Paul J.A. BORM Centre of Expertise in Life Sciences (CEL) Heerlen and Department of Particle Toxicology/Institut für Umweltmedizinische Forschung (IUF) Department of Particle Research University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany Dr Vicki COLVIN Director, Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (CBEN) Rice University Houston TX, USA Dr Wim H. DE JONG Laboratory for Toxicology, Pathology and Genetics National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven, The Netherlands Dr Jean-Pierre DUPUY1, 2 Centre of Research in Applied Epistemology (CREA) École Polytechnique Paris, France Prof. Göran HERMERÉN President of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies Lund, Sweden Dr Annabelle R. HETT Swiss Re Zurich, Switzerland 1 Member of the High Level Expert Group (HLEG) on “the new wave of emerging technologies and the convergence of nano, bio, info and cogno-technologies” set up by the Research Directorate-General to analyse and suggest proposals on European actions in these areas. Results and report expected for October 2004. For any further information, please contact Michael Rogers or Elie Faroult . 2 Invited expert
Recommended publications
  • Overgrazed Shrublands Support High Taxonomic, Functional and Temporal
    Ecological Indicators 103 (2019) 599–609 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Indicators journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind Overgrazed shrublands support high taxonomic, functional and temporal diversity of Mediterranean ground spider assemblages T ⁎ Dimitris Kaltsasa, , Eleni Panayiotoub, Konstantinos Kougioumoutzisc, Maria Chatzakid a Don Daleziou 45, 382 21 Volos, Greece b Palagia Alexandroupolis, PO Box 510, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece c Laboratory of Systematic Botany, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, Greece d Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The phryganic and maquis shrublands form the most typical vegetal formations in the Eastern Mediterranean Indicator species that since thousands of years have been subject to various types of anthropogenic disturbance, including grazing. Gnaphosidae We studied the impact of sheep and goat grazing on 50 assemblages of ground spiders (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) in Crete phryganic, maquis and forest habitats from zero to 2000 m elevation on Crete, Greece using pitfall traps for one Maquis year at each sampling site. In total, 58 gnaphosid species and 16,592 individuals were collected. Cretan endemic Livestock grazing Gnaphosidae were negatively affected by intensive grazing and, contrary to findings on other taxa studied on the Habitat degradation island, they were sparse and rare throughout the study area. The species composition of gnaphosid assemblages was primarily determined by elevation. Trachyzelotes lyonneti, Urozelotes rusticus, Zelotes scrutatus, Anagraphis pallens and Berinda amabilis proved to be significant indicators of overgrazing. The vast majority of spiders belonging to synanthropic and nationally red-listed species were found in overgrazed sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Impact of Molecular Nanotechnology on Textile Technology and on the Textile Industry
    The Future Impact of Molecular Nanotechnology on Textile Technology and on the Textile Industry David R. Forrest1 Discover Expo ’95 Industrial Fabric & Equipment Exposition Charlotte, North Carolina 12 October 1995 1 Business address: Research Specialist, Allegheny Ludlum Steel, Technical Center, Alabama & Pacific Aves., Brackenridge, PA 15014-1597. Voice: 412-226-6434, FAX: 412-226-6452, Internet: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: Technical Issues 1 Definition of Terms 1 Designing Molecular Machines and Devices 3 Calculating Geometries and Forces in Nanomechanical 4 Devices Nanomechanical Computational Systems 6 Molecular Sorting, Processing, and Assembly 7 Design for Reliability 8 Theoretical Properties of Materials 10 Applications of Nanotechnology to Industrial Fabrics 11 Smart Materials and Nanotechnology 12 Conclusions 13 Part 2: Economic and Social Policy Issues 14 The Origins of Molecular Nanotechnology 14 State-of-the-Art 17 Driving Forces for (and against) Development 18 Time Frame, Rate of Progress 19 Conclusions 20 Introduction Molecular nanotechnology is an emerging, interdisciplinary field combining princi- ples of molecular chemistry and physics with the engineering principles of mechani- cal design, structural analysis, computer science, electrical engineering, and systems engineering. Molecular manufacturing is a method conceived for the processing and rearrangement of atoms to fabricate custom products. It would rely on the use of a large number of molecular electro-mechanical subsystems working in parallel and using commonly available chemicals. Built to atomic specification, the products would exhibit order-of-magnitude improvements in strength, toughness, speed, and efficiency, and be of high quality and low cost. In Part 1: Technical Issues, I pro- vide an overview of molecular nanotechnology and explore ways in which molecu- lar manufacturing could be applied to improve textile products.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties
    ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    January 2018 CURRICULUM VITAE AGNES B. KANE PERSONAL DATA Business Address: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Box G-E534, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 Business Telephone Number: (401) 863-1110 Fax: (40l) 863-9008 EDUCATION B.A. Swarthmore College, Zoology 1968 M.D. Temple University School of Medicine 1974 Ph.D. Temple University School of Medicine, Experimental Pathology 1976 PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 1996-2017 Chair, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 1995-present Professor, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 1992-present Director, Training Program in Environmental Pathology, Brown University, Providence, RI 1987-95 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 1982-87 Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 1979-82 Staff Pathologist, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 1977-82 Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology and Fels Research Institute, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 1977-78 Resident in Anatomic Pathology, Temple University Hospital 1976-77 Postdoctoral Fellowship, National Research Service Award under Dr. Nils R. Ringertz, Medical Cell Genetics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden 1975-76 Resident in Anatomic Pathology, Temple University Hospital SPECIALTY BOARD CERTIFICATION 1979 Anatomic Pathology PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Pennsylvania, Rhode Island
    [Show full text]
  • Nanodata Landscape Compilation
    NanoData Landscape Compilation Environment Written by the Joint Institute for Innovation Policy, Brussels, Belgium, in co-operation with CWTS, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands; Frost & Sullivan Limited, London, United Kingdom; Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria; the Nanotechnology Industries Association, Brussels, Belgium; Tecnalia Research and Innovation, Bilbao, Spain; and TNO, The Hague, Netherlands. August 2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate Industrial Technologies Unit D.3 - Advanced Materials and Nanotechnologies E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION NanoData Landscape Compilation Environment Written by: Jacqueline E M Allan Babette Bakker Harrie Buist Guillaume Flament Christian Hartmann Iain Jawad Eelco Kuijpers Hanna Kuittinen Ed Noyons Claire Stolwijk Xabier Uriarte Olaeta and Alfredo Yegros Additional contributions: Ashfeen Aribea Iker Barrondo Saez Robbert Fisher Milica Misojcic Luca Remotti Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2017 Key Enabling Technologies EN EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you) LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. PDF ISBN 978-92-79-68388-6 doi: 10.2777/017097 KI-02-17-427-EN-N © European Union, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Promise and Threat of Nanotechnology: Can Environmental Ethics Guide Us?
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Philosophy Faculty Publications Philosophy 2005 The Promise and Threat of Nanotechnology: Can Environmental Ethics Guide Us? Christopher J. Preston The University Of Montana, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/philosophy_pubs Part of the Philosophy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Preston, Christopher J., "The Promise and Threat of Nanotechnology: Can Environmental Ethics Guide Us?" (2005). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 2. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/philosophy_pubs/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Promise and Threat of Nanotechnology Can Environmental Ethics Guide Us? Christopher J. Preston Abstract: The growing presence of the products of nanotechnology in the public domain raises a number of ethical questions. This paper considers whether existing environmental ethics can provide some guidance on these questions. After a brief discussion of the appropriateness of an environmental ethics framework for the task at hand, the paper identifies a representative en- vironmental ethic and uses it to evaluate four salient issues that emerge from nanotechnology. The discussion is intended both to give an initial theoretical take on nanotechnology from the perspective of environmental ethics and to provide a clear indication of the direction from which environmental resis- tance might come. Keywords: nanotechnology, environmental ethics, nature, fabricated biology, evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap: the Impact of Nanotechnologies on the Global Divide
    NIA Report 2 Closing the Gap: The Impact of Nanotechnologies on the global Divide 26 November 2013 Cover Picture: source: Steffi Friedrichs® The NIA, Nanotechnology Industries Association, is the sector-independent, responsible voice for the industrial nanotechnologies supply chains; it proactively supports the ongoing innovation and commercialisation of nanotechnologies and promotes their safe and reliable advancement. © Nanotechnology Industries Association, 2013 Legal Notice: Neither the Nanotechnology Industries Association (NIA) nor any person acting on behalf of the NIA is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Nanotechnology Industries Association BRUSSELS: 101 Avenue Louise 1050 Brussels Belgium t: +32 2300 5933 e: [email protected] w: www.nanotechia.org No. d'Entreprise / Company Registration No.: 810.218.531 LISBON: Apartado 000017 EC Rebelva - Carcavelos 2776-901 Rebelva Portugal t: +351 218 200 547 e: [email protected] LONDON: Lion House Red Lion Street London, WC1R 4GB United Kingdom t: +44 7554 713 394 e: [email protected] w: www.nanotechia.co.uk Company Registration No. 6521614 i NIA Report NIA Report Closing the Gap: The Impact of Nanotechnologies on the global Divide By Guillaume Flament 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... iv Glossary ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_manufacturing Molecular nanotechnology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Molecular manufacturing) Part of the article series on Molecular nanotechnology (MNT) is the concept of Nanotechnology topics Molecular Nanotechnology engineering functional mechanical systems at the History · Implications Applications · Organizations molecular scale.[1] An equivalent definition would be Molecular assembler Popular culture · List of topics "machines at the molecular scale designed and built Mechanosynthesis Subfields and related fields atom-by-atom". This is distinct from nanoscale Nanorobotics Nanomedicine materials. Based on Richard Feynman's vision of Molecular self-assembly Grey goo miniature factories using nanomachines to build Molecular electronics K. Eric Drexler complex products (including additional Scanning probe microscopy Engines of Creation Nanolithography nanomachines), this advanced form of See also: Nanotechnology Molecular nanotechnology [2] nanotechnology (or molecular manufacturing ) Nanomaterials would make use of positionally-controlled Nanomaterials · Fullerene mechanosynthesis guided by molecular machine systems. MNT would involve combining Carbon nanotubes physical principles demonstrated by chemistry, other nanotechnologies, and the molecular Nanotube membranes machinery Fullerene chemistry Applications · Popular culture Timeline · Carbon allotropes Nanoparticles · Quantum dots Colloidal gold · Colloidal
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Importance of Islands to Environmental Conservation?
    Environmental Conservation (2017) 44 (4): 311–322 C Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 doi:10.1017/S0376892917000479 What is the importance of islands to environmental THEMATIC SECTION Humans and Island conservation? Environments CHRISTOPH KUEFFER∗ 1 AND KEALOHANUIOPUNA KINNEY2 1Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland and 2Institute of Pacifc Islands Forestry, US Forest Service, 60 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, USA Date submitted: 15 May 2017; Date accepted: 8 August 2017 SUMMARY islands of the world’s oceans, we cover both islands close to continents and others isolated far out in the oceans, and the This article discusses four features of islands that make full range from small to very large islands. Small and isolated them places of special importance to environmental islands represent unique cultural and biological values and the conservation. First, investment in island conservation environmental challenges of insularity in its most pronounced is both urgent and cost-effective. Islands are form. However, as we will demonstrate, all islands and island threatened hotspots of diversity that concentrate people share enough come concerns to consider them together unique cultural, biological and geophysical values, (Baldacchino 2007; Royle 2008; Gillespie & Clague 2009; and they form the basis of the livelihoods of Baldacchino & Niles 2011; Royle 2014). millions of islanders. Second, islands are paradigmatic Islands are hotspots of cultural, biological and geophysical places of human–environment relationships. Island diversity, and as such they form the basis of the livelihoods livelihoods have a long tradition of existing within of millions of islanders (Menard 1986; Nunn 1994; Royle spatial, ecological and ultimately social boundaries 2008; Gillespie & Clague 2009; Royle 2014; Kueffer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Y A-T-Il Encore De La Place En Bas ? Le Paysage Contemporain Des Nanosciences Et Des Nanotechnologies
    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences 23-1 | 2019 Y a-t-il encore de la place en bas ? Le paysage contemporain des nanosciences et des nanotechnologies Jonathan Simon et Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (dir.) Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1693 DOI : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1693 ISSN : 1775-4283 Éditeur Éditions Kimé Édition imprimée Date de publication : 18 février 2019 ISSN : 1281-2463 Référence électronique Jonathan Simon et Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (dir.), Philosophia Scientiæ, 23-1 | 2019, « Y a-t-il encore de la place en bas ? » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 01 janvier 2021, consulté le 30 mars 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1693 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ philosophiascientiae.1693 Tous droits réservés Y a-t-il encore de la place en bas ? Le paysage contemporain des nanosciences et des nanotechnologies Introduction. Nanotechnoscience: The End of the Beginning Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (France) Jonathan Simon Archives Henri-Poincaré – Philosophie et Recherches sur les Sciences et les Technologies (AHP-PReST), Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Nancy (France) Is there still room at the bottom? The question providing the theme for the present issue of Philosophia Scientiæ is, of course, adapted from Richard Feynman’s well-known speech at the 1959 meeting of the American Physical Society. On this occasion he attracted physicists’ attention to the vast potential of working at the scale of the nanometre if not the ångström, using the catchy title: “Plenty of Room at the Bottom” [Feynman 1959]. This hookline from a famous Nobel laureate physicist served as a motto for the emerging field of nanoscience and nanotechnology (which we will here abbreviate to nanoresearch) in the early 2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Procedure #610
    09/2008 C-18. WORKING WITH NANOMATERIALS I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE At this time, there are no published regulations for safe work practices with nanomaterials, nor for controlling release of manufactured nanomaterials into the environment. Manufactured nanomaterials may pose unusual risks to human health due to their unique composition, reactivity, size, and ability to cross cell membranes [Nel 2006]. Preliminary studies indicate that engineered nanomaterials may exhibit markedly higher toxicity compared with macro scale materials of similar chemical composition. Current information about environmental, health, and safety risks associated with exposure to engineered nanomaterials is extremely limited. Until more definitive conclusions are made regarding the occupational and environmental risks of nanomaterials, interim precautionary work practices will be established and followed. Risk assessments and control strategies for nanotechnology research at the NCI-Frederick will be based on the most current toxicological data, exposure assessments, and exposure control information that is available1. II. POLICY It is the policy of the National Cancer Institute at Frederick (NCI-F) that all work with nanoparticles and material containing nanoparticles be conducted in a safe and responsible manner that protects NCI-F employees, the public, and the environment. Safe work practices are generally based on an understanding of the hazards associated with the composition of a material. Since the toxicity and hazards associated with nanomaterials is uncertain, nanomaterials will be handled using the same precautions currently used at NCI-F when handling toxic materials or materials of unknown toxicity (Chemical Hygiene Plan, Chapter C-1, EHS Operations Manual). III. DEFINITIONS Nanomaterials - Nanomaterials are defined as having at least one dimension less than 100 nanometers (nm; a nanometer is 10-9 meters) and typically are engineered to have unique properties which make them desirable for medical or commercial applications.
    [Show full text]