Università Degli Studi Di Milano the Role of NOTCH Pathway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Università Degli Studi Di Milano the Role of NOTCH Pathway Università degli Studi di Milano PhD program in Experimental medicine and medical biotechnologies XXIX cycle The role of NOTCH pathway in multiple myeloma progression: control of IL-6 expression in malignant plasma cells and bone marrow niche PhD thesis: Serena GALLETTI R10586 Tutor: Professor Antonino NERI Academic Year: 2015/2016 Summary ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Multiple Myeloma ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Multiple Myeloma pathogenesis and progression ............................................................................. 6 1.2 Genetic of Multiple Myeloma ........................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Diagnosis and clinical features ........................................................................................................ 12 1.4 The role of bone marrow niche in MM ........................................................................................... 12 1.5 Pharmacological treatments of MM ................................................................................................ 16 2 NOTCH pathway ..................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1 NOTCH components structure ........................................................................................................ 18 2.1.1 NOTCH receptors structure ............................................................................................................ 18 2.1.2 NOTCH ligands structure ............................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Activation and intracellular signaling of NOTCH ........................................................................... 20 2.3 NOTCH pathway regulation ............................................................................................................ 22 2.3.1 Receptors regulation ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Ligands regulation .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.4 NOTCH interaction with other signaling pathway .......................................................................... 26 2.4.1 Nuclear factor-κB ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.2 mTOR ............................................................................................................................................. 28 2.4.3 Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT................................................................................................ 30 2.4.4 Epidermal growth factor receptor ................................................................................................... 31 2.4.5 Wnt pathway ................................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.6 Hedgehog pathway ......................................................................................................................... 33 2.5 NOTCH involvement in cancer disease .......................................................................................... 34 2.5.1 NOTCH in Multiple Myeloma ....................................................................................................... 38 3 Interleukin-6 pathway .............................................................................................................................. 40 3.1 IL-6 signaling ........................................................................................................................................ 41 3.2 IL-6 and cancers .................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.1 IL-6 in Multiple Myeloma .............................................................................................................. 44 3.3. NOTCH pathway and IL-6 ................................................................................................................... 45 MATERIALS and METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 46 1. Cell cultures ............................................................................................................................................. 47 2. Treatments ............................................................................................................................................... 48 2.1 NOTCH pathway inhibition ............................................................................................................ 48 2.2 NOTCH pathway activation ............................................................................................................ 49 3. Gene expression analysis ......................................................................................................................... 49 3.1 RNA extraction ................................................................................................................................ 49 3.2 RNA quantification ......................................................................................................................... 50 3.3 Reverse transcription ....................................................................................................................... 50 3.4 Quantitative RT-PCR ...................................................................................................................... 51 3.5 Gene Expression Profiling (GEP) analysis ...................................................................................... 52 4. Western Blot ............................................................................................................................................ 53 5. RNA interference ..................................................................................................................................... 53 6. Luciferase reporter assay ......................................................................................................................... 54 7. Flow cytometry analysis .......................................................................................................................... 55 7.1 Apoptosis assay ............................................................................................................................... 55 7.2 Cell cycle assay ............................................................................................................................... 55 7.3 Intracellular IL-6 detection .............................................................................................................. 55 8. Immunohistochemistry (IHC).................................................................................................................. 56 9. Statistical analysis ................................................................................................................................... 57 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 58 1. Gene expression profiling (GEP) analysis on a cohort of MM patients .................................................. 59 2. IL-6 independence is a consequence of NOTCH pathway activity ......................................................... 61 3. IL-6 production is induced by NOTCH signaling in MM cells ............................................................... 66 4. BMSCs are able to support MM tumor growth through IL-6 production induced by NOTCH signaling pathway ........................................................................................................................................................... 70 5. NOTCH pathway activation in BMSCs mediated by JAGGED ligands presented on MM cells promotes IL-6 production by BMSCs and their ability to support tumor growth ........................................................... 74 6. NOTCH signaling withdrawal reduces the release of IL-6 in co-cultures of primary MM cells and BMSCs ............................................................................................................................................................ 78 CONCLUSIONS and DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................. 82 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................... 90 ABSTRACT Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological tumor characterized by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells (PCs) within the bone marrow (BM). MM cells create a very strictly interaction with the surrounding BM niche that directly supports tumor growth through adhesion
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Type I Interferon in the Immunobiology of Chikungunya Virus
    The role of type I interferon in the immunobiology of chikungunya virus Jane Amelia Clare Wilson B. App. Sc. (Human Biology), B. App. Sc. (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Medicine & QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute I Abstract Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-transmitted alphavirus that can cause explosive outbreaks of a febrile, arthritic/arthralgic disease usually lasting weeks to months, and in rare cases, more than a year. In 2004, the largest ever CHIKV outbreak began in Kenya, spreading to islands of the Indian Ocean, India, South East Asia and major outbreaks have recently occurred in the South Pacific Islands and the Caribbean. The host type I interferon (IFN) response is crucial for effective control of CHIKV infection. Herein, the dynamics, source and responses generated by the type I IFNs following CHIKV infection were investigated. Interferon regulatory factors 3 (IRF3) and IRF7 are key transcription factors for the type I IFN response. While CHIKV infection of wild-type mice is non-lethal, infection of mice deficient in both IRF3 and IRF7 (IRF3/7-/-) resulted in mortality, illustrating that these factors are essential for protection. Using knockout mice for the adaptor molecules upstream of IRF3 and 7, IPS1 was found to be the most important for type I IFN production, with TRIF and MyD88 also contributing to the response. Mortality in IRF3/7-/- mice was also associated with type I IFN suppression of pathological levels of IFNγ and haemorrhagic shock. Heterozygous reporter mice, in which eGFP was expressed under the control of either the IFNβ or the IFNα6 promoter on one chromosome, were employed to try and identify the cellular source of type I IFN production following CHIVK infection.
    [Show full text]
  • FAM46C Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression And
    www.aging-us.com AGING 2020, Vol. 12, No. 7 Research Paper FAM46C inhibits cell proliferation and cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis through PTEN/AKT signaling pathway and is associated with chemosensitivity in prostate cancer Libin Ma1,*, Huadong He2,*, Kang Jiang2, Peiwu Jiang3, Han He2, Shengjia Feng4, Kean Chen5, Jia Shao2, Gang Deng2 1Department of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, China 2Department of Urology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China 3Surgical Department I, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang, China 4Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China 5Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, China *Equal contribution Correspondence to: Gang Deng; email: [email protected] Keywords: prostate cancer, tumorigenesis, ubiquitination, FAM46C, PTEN Received: September 27, 2019 Accepted: February 23, 2020 Published: April 13, 2020 Copyright: Ma et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Family with sequence similarity 46 member C (FAM46C) is a non-canonical poly(A) polymerase that is associated with tumorigenesis. However, its role in prostate cancer development is not fully understood. Herein, we determined expression pattern of FAM46C in prostate cancer and further identified its effect on the tumorigenesis and chemosensitivity. FAM46C expression was decreased in prostate cancer tissues and cell lines compared with corresponding controls.
    [Show full text]
  • NCTD Elicits Proapoptotic and Antiglycolytic Effects on Colorectal Cancer Cells Via Modulation of Fam46c Expression and Inhibition of ERK1/2 Signaling
    774 MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 22: 774-782, 2020 NCTD elicits proapoptotic and antiglycolytic effects on colorectal cancer cells via modulation of Fam46c expression and inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling SHIQIANG ZHANG1,2*, YUN YANG1,2*, YUNWEI HUA3, CHEN HU4 and YI ZHONG2 1Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Departments of 2Oncology and 3Gastroenterology, Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital; 4School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200082, P.R. China Received April 18, 2019; Accepted November 1, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11151 Abstract. Colorectal cancer is a digestive tract malignancy identified a novel therapeutic target of NCTD in the clinical and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality treatment of colorectal cancer. worldwide. Norcantharidin (NCTD), the demethylated form of cantharidin, has been reported to possess anticancer Introduction properties. Family-with-sequence-similarity-46c (Fam46c), a non-canonical poly(A) polymerase, has been reported to Colorectal cancer was the third leading cause of cancer-related be critical in NCTD‑mediated effects in numerous types of deaths worldwide in 2016 (1,2). Its pathogenesis is closely cancer, including hepatoma. In the current study, it was found related to various factors, including lifestyle, heredity and that Fam46c expression was reduced in colorectal cancer colorectal adenoma (3,4). Colorectal cancer often arises at tissues and cells. Treatment with NCTD was observed to the age of 40-50 years, with the ratio of men to women being significantly enhance apoptosis and inhibit glycolysis in 1.65:1 (1). According to previous studies, the incidence of colorectal cancer cells. In addition, Fam46c and cleaved colorectal cancer has been steadily increasing in China over caspase 3 expression levels were found to be increased in the years, especially in underdeveloped areas (5-7).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Indacaterol-Regulated Transcriptome in Human Airway
    Supplemental material to this article can be found at: http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/04/13/jpet.118.249292.DC1 1521-0103/366/1/220–236$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.118.249292 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS J Pharmacol Exp Ther 366:220–236, July 2018 Copyright ª 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Analysis of the Indacaterol-Regulated Transcriptome in Human Airway Epithelial Cells Implicates Gene Expression Changes in the s Adverse and Therapeutic Effects of b2-Adrenoceptor Agonists Dong Yan, Omar Hamed, Taruna Joshi,1 Mahmoud M. Mostafa, Kyla C. Jamieson, Radhika Joshi, Robert Newton, and Mark A. Giembycz Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology (D.Y., O.H., T.J., K.C.J., R.J., M.A.G.) and Cell Biology and Anatomy (M.M.M., R.N.), Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Received March 22, 2018; accepted April 11, 2018 Downloaded from ABSTRACT The contribution of gene expression changes to the adverse and activity, and positive regulation of neutrophil chemotaxis. The therapeutic effects of b2-adrenoceptor agonists in asthma was general enriched GO term extracellular space was also associ- investigated using human airway epithelial cells as a therapeu- ated with indacaterol-induced genes, and many of those, in- tically relevant target. Operational model-fitting established that cluding CRISPLD2, DMBT1, GAS1, and SOCS3, have putative jpet.aspetjournals.org the long-acting b2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) indacaterol, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and/or antiviral activity. Numer- salmeterol, formoterol, and picumeterol were full agonists on ous indacaterol-regulated genes were also induced or repressed BEAS-2B cells transfected with a cAMP-response element in BEAS-2B cells and human primary bronchial epithelial cells by reporter but differed in efficacy (indacaterol $ formoterol .
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Inflammation Regulates Long Non-Coding RNA-PTTG1-1:1 in Myeloid Leukemia
    SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Inflammation regulates long non-coding RNA-PTTG1-1:1 in myeloid leukemia Sébastien Chateauvieux, 1,2 Anthoula Gaigneaux, 1° Déborah Gérard, 1 Marion Orsini, 1 Franck Morceau, 1 Barbora Orlikova-Boyer, 1,2 Thomas Farge, 3,4 Christian Récher, 3,4,5 Jean-Emmanuel Sarry, 3,4 Mario Dicato 1 and Marc Diederich 2 °Current address: University of Luxembourg, Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication, Life Science Research Unit, Belvaux, Luxemburg. 1Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du Cancer, Hôpital Kirchberg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg; 2College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea; 3Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, UMR 1037 INSERM/ Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; 4Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France and 5Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopôle, Toulouse, France Correspondence: MARC DIEDERICH - [email protected] doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.217281 Supplementary data Inflammation regulates long non-coding RNA-PTTG1-1:1 in myeloid leukemia Sébastien Chateauvieux1,2, Anthoula Gaigneaux1*, Déborah Gérard1, Marion Orsini1, Franck Morceau1, Barbora Orlikova-Boyer1,2, Thomas Farge3,4, Christian Récher3,4,5, Jean-Emmanuel Sarry3,4, Mario Dicato1 and Marc Diederich2 1 Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du Cancer, Hôpital Kirchberg, 9, rue Edward Steichen, 2540 Luxembourg, Luxemburg; 2 College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro,
    [Show full text]
  • Promiscuous MYC Locus Rearrangements Hijack Enhancers but Mostly Super-Enhancers to Dysregulate MYC Expression in Multiple Myeloma
    Leukemia (2014) 28, 1725–1735 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/14 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Promiscuous MYC locus rearrangements hijack enhancers but mostly super-enhancers to dysregulate MYC expression in multiple myeloma M Affer1, M Chesi1, WD Chen2, JJ Keats3, YN Demchenko2, K Tamizhmani1,2, VM Garbitt1, DL Riggs1, LA Brents2, AV Roschke2, S Van Wier1, R Fonseca1, PL Bergsagel1,4 and WM Kuehl2,4 MYC locus rearrangements—often complex combinations of translocations, insertions, deletions and inversions—in multiple myeloma (MM) were thought to be a late progression event, which often did not involve immunoglobulin genes. Yet, germinal center activation of MYC expression has been reported to cause progression to MM in an MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance)-prone mouse strain. Although previously detected in 16% of MM, we find MYC rearrangements in nearly 50% of MM, including smoldering MM, and they are heterogeneous in some cases. Rearrangements reposition MYC near a limited number of genes associated with conventional enhancers, but mostly with super-enhancers (e.g., IGH, IGL, IGK, NSMCE2, TXNDC5, FAM46C, FOXO3, IGJ, PRDM1). MYC rearrangements are associated with a significant increase of MYC expression that is monoallelic, but MM tumors lacking a rearrangement have biallelic MYC expression at significantly higher levels than in MGUS. We also have shown that germinal center activation of MYC does not cause MM in a mouse strain that rarely develops spontaneous MGUS. It appears that increased MYC expression at the MGUS/MM transition usually is biallelic, but sometimes can be monoallelic if there is an MYC rearrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1
    Supplementary Table 1. 492 genes are unique to 0 h post-heat timepoint. The name, p-value, fold change, location and family of each gene are indicated. Genes were filtered for an absolute value log2 ration 1.5 and a significance value of p ≤ 0.05. Symbol p-value Log Gene Name Location Family Ratio ABCA13 1.87E-02 3.292 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family unknown transporter A (ABC1), member 13 ABCB1 1.93E-02 −1.819 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter B (MDR/TAP), member 1 Membrane ABCC3 2.83E-02 2.016 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter C (CFTR/MRP), member 3 Membrane ABHD6 7.79E-03 −2.717 abhydrolase domain containing 6 Cytoplasm enzyme ACAT1 4.10E-02 3.009 acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1 Cytoplasm enzyme ACBD4 2.66E-03 1.722 acyl-CoA binding domain unknown other containing 4 ACSL5 1.86E-02 −2.876 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain Cytoplasm enzyme family member 5 ADAM23 3.33E-02 −3.008 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 23 Membrane ADAM29 5.58E-03 3.463 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 29 Membrane ADAMTS17 2.67E-04 3.051 ADAM metallopeptidase with Extracellular other thrombospondin type 1 motif, 17 Space ADCYAP1R1 1.20E-02 1.848 adenylate cyclase activating Plasma G-protein polypeptide 1 (pituitary) receptor Membrane coupled type I receptor ADH6 (includes 4.02E-02 −1.845 alcohol dehydrogenase 6 (class Cytoplasm enzyme EG:130) V) AHSA2 1.54E-04 −1.6 AHA1, activator of heat shock unknown other 90kDa protein ATPase homolog 2 (yeast) AK5 3.32E-02 1.658 adenylate kinase 5 Cytoplasm kinase AK7
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Factors and Ribosomal Proteins Control Tumor Onset and Progression: How?
    Oncogene (2014) 33, 2145–2156 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/14 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Translation factors and ribosomal proteins control tumor onset and progression: how? F Loreni1, M Mancino2,3 and S Biffo2,3 Gene expression is shaped by translational control. The modalities and the extent by which translation factors modify gene expression have revealed therapeutic scenarios. For instance, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E activity is controlled by the signaling cascade of growth factors, and drives tumorigenesis by favoring the translation of specific mRNAs. Highly specific drugs target the activity of eIF4E. Indeed, the antitumor action of mTOR complex 1 (mTORc1) blockers like rapamycin relies on their capability to inhibit eIF4E assembly into functional eIF4F complexes. eIF4E biology, from its inception to recent pharmacological targeting, is proof-of-principle that translational control is druggable. The case for eIF4E is not isolated. The translational machinery is involved in the biology of cancer through many other mechanisms. First, untranslated sequences on mRNAs as well as noncoding RNAs regulate the translational efficiency of mRNAs that are central for tumor progression. Second, other initiation factors like eIF6 show a tumorigenic potential by acting downstream of oncogenic pathways. Third, genetic alterations in components of the translational apparatus underlie an entire class of inherited syndromes known as ‘ribosomopathies’ that are associated with increased cancer risk. Taken together, data suggest that in spite of their evolutionary conservation and ubiquitous nature, variations in the activity and levels of ribosomal proteins and translation factors generate highly specific effects. Beside, as the structures and biochemical activities of several noncoding RNAs and initiation factors are known, these factors may be amenable to rational pharmacological targeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammatory, Regulatory, and Autophagy Co-Expression Modules
    Durocher et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2019) 16:56 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1433-4 RESEARCH Open Access Inflammatory, regulatory, and autophagy co-expression modules and hub genes underlie the peripheral immune response to human intracerebral hemorrhage Marc Durocher1, Bradley P. Ander1, Glen Jickling1, Farah Hamade1, Heather Hull1, Bodie Knepp1, Da Zhi Liu1, Xinhua Zhan1, Anh Tran1, Xiyuan Cheng1, Kwan Ng1, Alan Yee1, Frank R. Sharp1 and Boryana Stamova1,2* Abstract Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has a high morbidity and mortality. The peripheral immune system and cross-talk between peripheral blood and brain have been implicated in the ICH immune response. Thus, we delineated the gene networks associated with human ICH in the peripheral blood transcriptome. We also compared the differentially expressed genes in blood following ICH to a prior human study of perihematomal brain tissue. Methods: We performed peripheral blood whole-transcriptome analysis of ICH and matched vascular risk factor control subjects (n = 66). Gene co-expression network analysis identified groups of co-expressed genes (modules) associated with ICH and their most interconnected genes (hubs). Mixed-effects regression identified differentially expressed genes in ICH compared to controls. Results: Of seven ICH-associated modules, six were enriched with cell-specific genes: one neutrophil module, one neutrophil plus monocyte module, one T cell module, one Natural Killer cell module, and two erythroblast modules. The neutrophil/monocyte modules were enriched in inflammatory/immune pathways; the T cell module in T cell receptor signaling genes; and the Natural Killer cell module in genes regulating alternative splicing, epigenetic, and post-translational modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • FAM46C Inhibits Lipopolysaccharides-Induced
    Life Sciences 229 (2019) 1–12 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Life Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lifescie FAM46C inhibits lipopolysaccharides-induced myocardial dysfunction via downregulating cellular adhesion molecules and inhibiting apoptosis T ⁎ Jiaying Tana,1, Tao Sunb,1, Jun Shena, Huigeng Zhua, Ye Gonga, Hechen Zhua, Gang Wua, a Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, PR China b Department of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Aims: Sepsis is a syndrome of inflammatory response induced by infection. Cellular adhesion molecules may FAM46C involve in sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) which is a major predictor of morbidity and mortality Sepsis of sepsis. Here we studied the role of FAM46C in AC16 cells and c57 mice with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) TLR4 treatment. SIMD Main methods: Real-time PCR and western blot were used to detect the expression level of relative genes and protein. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated. Key findings: Interestingly, negative correlation between Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and FAM46C in sepsis was observed. The overexpression of FAM46C reduced the apoptosis induced by LPS in AC16 cells. Inhibition of apoptosis contributed by FAM46C was mediated by adhesion molecule via blocking p38 and ERK/MAPK sig- naling pathway. Moreover, overexpression of Fam46c and inhibition of TLR4 by TAK-242 could attenuate apoptosis induced by LPS in vivo. Significance: FAM46C played an important role in SIMD via inhibiting LPS-induced myocardial dysfunction by downregulating cellular adhesion molecules and inhibiting apoptosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Retinoid Regulation of Antiviral Innate Immunity in Hepatocytes Noell E
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Staff U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Publications 2016 Retinoid Regulation of Antiviral Innate Immunity in Hepatocytes Noell E. Cho University of Southern California Bo-Ram Bang University of Southern California Purnima Gurung University of Southern California Meng Li University of Southern California Dahn L. Clemens University of Nebraska Medical Center, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/veterans Cho, Noell E.; Bang, Bo-Ram; Gurung, Purnima; Li, Meng; Clemens, Dahn L.; Underhill, T. Michael; James, Laura P.; Chase, Jenifer R.; and Saito, Takeshi, "Retinoid Regulation of Antiviral Innate Immunity in Hepatocytes" (2016). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Staff Publications. 114. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/veterans/114 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Noell E. Cho, Bo-Ram Bang, Purnima Gurung, Meng Li, Dahn L. Clemens, T. Michael Underhill, Laura P. James, Jenifer R. Chase, and Takeshi Saito This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/veterans/114 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OFLIVERD I S E ASES HEPATOLOGY, VOL. 63, NO.
    [Show full text]
  • DURUSSEL Et Al TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURE of Rhuepo
    DURUSSEL et al TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF rHuEPO Title: The blood transcriptional signature of recombinant human erythropoietin administration and implications for anti-doping strategies Authors: Jérôme Durussel1, Diresibachew W. Haile2, Kerli Mooses3, Evangelia Daskalaki4, Wendy Beattie1, Martin Mooses3, Wondyefraw Mekonen2, Neford Ongaro5, Edwin Anjila5, Rajan K. Patel1, Neal Padmanabhan1, Martin W. McBride1, John D. McClure1, and Yannis P. Pitsiladis6*. Affiliations: 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 2Department of Medical Physiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 3Faculty of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; 4Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom;5Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya; and 6Centre for Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, United Kingdom. *Corresponding Author: Professor Yannis P. Pitsiladis Professor of Sport and Exercise Science, Director of the Centre Centre for Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME) Hillbrow, Denton Road Eastbourne, BN20 7SP, United Kingdom Email [email protected] Telephone +44 (0) 1273 643707 (Reception) Fax +44 (0) 1273 643704 1 | DURUSSEL et al TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF rHuEPO Running Head: Transcriptional signature
    [Show full text]