DOCSLIB.ORG

With Brian Schmidt Interviewer: Melina Bersten

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
With Brian Schmidt Interviewer: Melina Bersten Interview with Brian Schmidt Interviewer: Melina Bersten Interest in Supernova my other one.) I was working Study Dates Back to for him on his project. After Undergraduate Days about a year, I was getting Bersten: First of all, I’d like to the point where I could to congratulate you for the do something useful. One of Nobel Prize. the things they wanted to do Schmidt: Thank was to discover supernovae you very much. in their data set. It was the Bersten: I can rst digital survey. It was like imagine you are very the Sloan Digital Sky Survey happy. I would like to where the sky transited go back to the origin across the detector and they of it all. How did you moved the information on the get interested in the study detector along with the sky, of supernova? drift scanning as it’s called. I Schmidt: I was an liked the idea of discovering undergraduate at the something new in the data. University of Arizona and So I started looking for that as there was a project run by part of my work for him as an John McGraw who was my undergraduate. undergraduate supervisor. Now, I had not intended (One of two. Tom Swihart was to do that for my Ph.D. thesis and it was when Bob Kirshner Brian Schmidt is Distinguished visited to give the rst Marc Professor at the Research School Aaronson Memorial Lecture of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the Australian National University, at University of Arizona when formerly known as Mount Stromlo I was nishing my last year and Siding Spring Observatories. He, together with Saul Perlmutter and of studies there and I was Adam Riess, received the 2011 Nobel trying to gure out where to Prize in Physics "for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of go to graduate school. Would the Universe through observations I go to Caltech, would I go of distant supernovae". He has also received many other distinguished to Santa Cruz, or would I go awards. In particular, he shared the to Harvard? Those were my 2006 Shaw Prize in Astronomy with Saul Perlmutter and Adam three choices at the end and I Riess. He received his Ph.D. from just could not decide. Harvard University in 1993. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard- In the end, Bob came and Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics gave a very good talk on from 1993 to 1994. He moved to the Mount Stromlo Observatory in 1995. supernovae and I said“, Well, I 18 Kavli IPMU News No. 20 December 2012 hadn’t really thought of doing Hubble constant to a level supernovae for my Ph.D. thesis, where the systematic error but I do nd them interesting in the method was about and here is someone who I the same as the statistical can work with at Harvard.” I error. I felt I had got my said to him“, If I can work with answer and there wasn’t you on supernovae then I’ll much else to do with that come to Harvard.” That’s how I method. I was looking to do got started. other things. I was looking Bersten: At the beginning, at how the explosions of you studied Type II supernova. Type II supernovae occur Schmidt: As an undergrad, in by measuring what their Arizona, we were just looking nucleosynthetic output was, for them. We didn’t care relative to their mass, and to what type they were. But, at their explosion energy. Harvard for my Ph.D. thesis, I In 1994, Mario Hamuy did study Type II supernovae. I visited us and showed us measured distances with them the work that they had done in a way that Bob Kirshner in Chile, which essentially did for his Ph.D. thesis. When said you could use Type I came to Harvard, Bob gave Ia supernovae to make me a project to go and look measurements that were at supernova 1987A. I said, roughly two to three times “No, I don’t want to do that. I better than the supernovae I want to do something else. I had used. At the same time, want to measure the Hubble Saul Perlmutter called us up constant and I want to do and said we have an object it using this technique that to look at, which we took a you developed back in your spectrum of with the MMT–I thesis.” I was going to improve was actually at Harvard; it was it. He had a postdoc who Bob Kirshner, Pete Challis, and could model the supernovae Adam Riess. When they said, very accurately and do it with “We think it’s a High-Redshift a radiative transfer code and supernova,” I went and so I was going to work with analyzed it. I got the same Ron Eastman, and to improve answer. the method to measure the Eventually, we found out Hubble constant. That’s what I from Saul Perlmutter that really did for my Ph.D. thesis. that was one of seven objects Bersten: What was the they had discovered. They main reason that made you had been looking for them change the focus into Type Ia since 1988 and suddenly supernova? In other words, they found seven of them. what was the main reason That was a real eye opener that motivated you to form the Interview High-Redshift Team? Melina Bersten is a postdoctoral Schmidt: When I nished my fellow at the Kavli IPMU. She is an astronomer studying supernovae Ph.D. thesis, I’d measured the computationally and theoretically. 19 to me that you could discover computer hardware that we The second day is useless. If that we would go through them and we knew how to could all use together was a it’s cloudy at the second day, to discover these supernovae use them. I literally, when problem. We got around it by then the rst day image just because we didn’t have a I found those things out, working really, really hard. But sits there. home base we could ship dropped everything that I was that was part of the difculty We needed to have a them to–and just have stable doing and said“, There is an of having someone young place that was guaranteed software–that was a real, real opportunity to go and measure like myself going and running to give us two clear nights. nightmare. q0, the deceleration parameter, things. The good part is that Chile, the Atacama Desert, The other problem in 1995 right now.” To me, that was this was the one thing I was was really the only place that was that we didn’t have just the big thing to do and it working on. And not just me, gives that good of weather, access to the Keck 10 meter was the most exciting thing Adam Riess, Peter Garnavich, guaranteed. Plus that new telescopes. Now in 1995, I could think of doing. It was you know, we were young detector meant we could do Bruno Leibundgut and Jason measuring what’s the ultimate and we worked on this one it. And, of course, the team at Spyromilio with the ESO fate of the universe. I dropped thing. We worked on it night Cerro Tololo means we knew NTT, in very good conditions, everything I was doing to go and day and that was the only the instrument and telescope managed to get a spectrum measure that. thing we worked on. That very well. So that’s where of our supernova at a redshift Bersten: At that moment you was one of the reasons we we decided to work. Saul’s of 0.48. They spent almost all were quite young. Was that a were able to make progress– team had not yet realized night and it took them about problem for being a leader of that we were not distracted the possibilities at Cerro a month to reduce the data the program? by other things. Tololo at that point. So we and actually see that it was Bersten: Could you tell me a applied, and after we made a Type Ia supernova. But that little about the methodology our rst discovery (SN 1995K), was an all-night affair in very As a Young Leader, Organized the High-Redshift and how many telescopes you they realized the natural good conditions–in reality the Team like Organizing a Party used–and also, identify which advantages of working at 4-meter telescopes were too Schmidt: I was the leader was the most difcult task CTIO, and presumably thought, small to get spectra of these of the team but not in a during the program? “Geez, that’s a good place to high-redshift supernovae on a traditional sense. I wasn’t a Schmidt: In 1994 when we work. We should do that too.” consistent basis. general telling everyone what started, we had these new The challenge of actually In the meantime, Keck to do. I was the consensus CCDs, and I was down in discovering supernovae had come online and Saul leader of a bunch of people Chile talking to Nick Suntzeff, was hard. The software I Perlmutter’s group had access working together as friends. who was one of the leads had written wasn’t very to Keck and they completely I had to organize people, but of the Calán/Tololo Survey good. It worked, but I had killed us in 1995. They found it was like organizing a party. that had gured out how to written it in Australia and all these objects at the end You’d just tell people to show use Type Ia supernovae.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saul Perlmutter Receives Nobel Prize in Physics 27 October 2011
    Saul Perlmutter receives Nobel Prize in physics 27 October 2011 wonderful that the Nobel Prize is being awarded for results which reflect humanity's long quest to understand our world and how we got here. The ideas and discoveries that led to our ability to measure the expansion history of the universe have a truly international heritage, with key contributions from almost every continent and culture. And quite appropriately, our result - the acceleration of the universe - was the product of two teams of scientists from around the world. These are the kinds of discoveries that the whole world can feel a part of and celebrate, as humanity advances its knowledge of our universe." Saul Perlmutter addresses reporters and Berkeley Lab "I offer my congratulations to Dr. Perlmutter and the staff at a press conference on the morning of October 4 entire Berkeley Lab team for their extraordinary following the announcement of his Nobel Prize in contributions to science, which are being Physics. Credit: Roy Kaltschmidt, Lawrence Berkeley recognized with the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics," National Laboratory said Energy Secretary Steven Chu, former director of Berkeley Lab and himself a winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997. "His groundbreaking work showed us that the expansion of the universe is Saul Perlmutter, an astrophysicist at the U.S. actually speeding up rather than slowing down. Dr. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley Perlmutter's award is another reminder of the National Laboratory and a professor of physics at incredible talent and world-leading expertise the University of California at Berkeley, has won America has at our National Laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Observatories Interim Director Claire Max Astronomers Discover Three Planets Orbiting Nearby Star 4 Shortly
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OBSERVATORIES UCO FOCUS SPRING 2015 ucolick.org 1 From the Director’s Desk 2 From the Director’s Desk Contents Letter from UC Observatories Interim Director Claire Max Astronomers Discover Three Planets Orbiting Nearby Star 4 shortly. Our Summer Series tickets are already sold out. The Automated Planet Finder (APF) spots exoplanets near HD 7924. Lick Observatory’s following on social media is substantial – both within the scientific community and beyond. Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Expands at Lick 6 The NIROSETI instrument will soon scour the sky for messages. Keck Observatory continues to be one of the most scientifically productive ground-based telescopes in the Science Internship Program Expands 8 world. It gives unparalleled access to astronomers from UCSC Professor Raja GuhaThakurta’s program is growing rapidly. UC, Caltech, and the University of Hawaii, as well as at other institutions through partnerships with NASA and Lick Observatory’s Summer Series Kicks Off In June 9 academic organizations. Several new instruments for Keck are being built or completed right now: the Keck Tickets are already sold out for the 35th annual program. Cosmic Web Imager, the NIRES infrared spectrograph, and a deployable tertiary mirror for Keck 1. The Keck Lick Observatory Panel Featured on KQED 9 Observatory Archive is now fully ingesting data from all Alex Filippenko and Aaron Romanowsky interviewed about Lick. Keck instruments, and makes these data available to » p.4 Three Planets Found (ABOVE) Claire Max inside the Shane 3-meter dome while the the whole world. Keck’s new Director, Hilton Lewis, is on Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
    Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter and Dark Energy
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research The building blocks of the universe Author: I review the state of knowledge of the composition of the universe for a non-specialist audience. 1,2 Anslyn J. John The universe is built up of four components. These are radiation, baryonic (ordinary) matter, Affiliation: dark matter and dark energy. In this article, a quick outline of the theory of Big Bang 1Department of Physics, nucleosynthesis is presented, and the origin of the elements is explained. Cosmology requires Faculty of Science, the presence of dark matter, which forms most of the mass of the universe, and dark energy, Stellenbosch University, which drives the acceleration of the expansion. The dark sector is motivated, and possible Stellenbosch, South Africa explanations are stated. 2National Institute for Contribution: As part of this special collection on building blocks, the building blocks of the Theoretical and Computational Sciences universe are discussed and unsolved problems and proposed solutions are highlighted. (NITheCS), South Africa Keywords: cosmology; nucleosynthesis; dark matter; dark energy; cosmological constant; Corresponding author: general relativity; galaxies; particle physics. Anslyn John, [email protected] Dates: Introduction Received: 10 May 2021 Cosmology is the scientific study of the origin and development of the universe on the largest Accepted: 12 July 2021 Published: 25 Aug. 2021 scales. Today, the standard model of cosmology is a cornerstone of physics and astronomy. This is attested to by the award of four Nobel Prizes for research in cosmology. These awards, in How to cite this article: chronological order, are: John, A.J., 2021, ‘The building blocks of the universe’, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences - - an Analysis of Collectively Formed Errors in Physics by C
    Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Physics and Space Science Volume 12 Issue 4 Version 1.0 June 2012 Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896 Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences - - An Analysis of Collectively Formed Errors in Physics By C. Y. Lo Applied and Pure Research Institute, Nashua, NH Abstract - The 2011 Shaw Prize in mathematical sciences is shared by Richard S. Hamilton and D. Christodoulou. However, the work of Christodoulou on general relativity is based on obscure errors that implicitly assumed essentially what is to be proved, and thus gives misleading results. The problem of Einstein’s equation was discovered by Gullstrand of the 1921 Nobel Committee. In 1955, Gullstrand is proven correct. The fundamental errors of Christodoulou were due to his failure to distinguish the difference between mathematics and physics. His subsequent errors in mathematics and physics were accepted since judgments were based not on scientific evidence as Galileo advocates, but on earlier incorrect speculations. Nevertheless, the Committee for the Nobel Prize in Physics was also misled as shown in their 1993 press release. Here, his errors are identified as related to accumulated mistakes in the field, and are illustrated with examples understandable at the undergraduate level. Another main problem is that many theorists failed to understand the principle of causality adequately. It is unprecedented to award a prize for mathematical errors. Keywords : Nobel Prize; general relativity; Einstein equation, Riemannian Space; the non- existence of dynamic solution; Galileo. GJSFR-A Classification : 04.20.-q, 04.20.Cv Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences -- An Analysis of Collectively Formed Errors in Physics Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of : © 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Luis Alvarez: the Ideas Man
    CERN Courier March 2012 Commemoration Luis Alvarez: the ideas man The years from the early 1950s to the late 1980s came alive again during a symposium to commemorate the birth of one of the great scientists and inventors of the 20th century. Luis Alvarez – one of the greatest experimental physicists of the 20th century – combined the interests of a scientist, an inventor, a detective and an explorer. He left his mark on areas that ranged from radar through to cosmic rays, nuclear physics, particle accel- erators, detectors and large-scale data analysis, as well as particles and astrophysics. On 19 November, some 200 people gathered at Berkeley to commemorate the 100th anniversary of his birth. Alumni of the Alvarez group – among them physicists, engineers, programmers and bubble-chamber film scanners – were joined by his collaborators, family, present-day students and admirers, as well as scientists whose professional lineage traces back to him. Hosted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and the University of California at Berkeley, the symposium reviewed his long career and lasting legacy. A recurring theme of the symposium was, as one speaker put it, a “Shakespeare-type dilemma”: how could one person have accom- plished all of that in one lifetime? Beyond his own initiatives, Alvarez created a culture around him that inspired others to, as George Smoot put it, “think big,” as well as to “think broadly and then deep” and to take risks. Combined with Alvarez’s strong scientific standards and great care in execut- ing them, these principles led directly to the awarding of two Nobel Luis Alvarez celebrating the announcement of his 1968 Nobel prizes in physics to scientists at Berkeley – George Smoot in 2006 prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics & Astronomy
    UCLADepartment of Physics & Astronomy Thursday April 22, 2004 at 3:30pm Room 1200 Alexei V. Filippenko, Professor of Astronomy University of California - Berkeley Alex Filippenko received his B.A. in Physics from UC Santa Barbara in 1979, and his Ph.D. in Astronomy from Caltech in 1984. He then became a Miller Fellow at UC Berkeley, and he joined the Berkeley faculty in 1986. His primary areas of research are supernovae, active galaxies, black holes, and observationalcosmology; he has also spearheaded efforts to develop robotic telescopes. He has coauthored over 400 publications on these topics, and has won numerous awards for his research, most recently a Guggenheim Fellowship. A dedicated and enthusiastic instructor, he has won the top teaching awards at UC Berkeley, and in 1995, 2001, and 2003 he o was voted the "Best Professor" on campus in informal student polls. In 1998 he produced a 40- i lecture astronomy video course with The Teaching Company, and in 2003 he taped a 16-lecture update on recent astronomical discoveries. In 2000 he coauthored an award-winning b introductory astronomy textbook; the second edition appeared in 2003. Evidence from Type Ia Supernovae for a Decelerating, then Accelerating Universe and Dark Energy The measured distances of type Ia (hydrogen- t deficient) supernovae as a function of redshift c (z) have shown that the expansion of the Universe is currently accelerating, probably a due to the presence of repulsive dark energy (X) such as Einstein's cosmological constant r (L). Combining all of the data with existing t results from large-scale structure surveys, we find a best fit for WM and WX of 0.28 and s 0.72 (respectively), in excellent agreement with b the values (0.27 and 0.73) recently derived from WMAP measurements of the cosmic a microwave background radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Wrong
    Einstein’s wrong way: from STR to GTR Adrian Ferent I discovered a new Gravitation theory which breaks the wall of Planck scale! Abstract My Nobel Prize - Discoveries “Starting from STR, it is not possible to find a Quantum Gravity theory” Adrian Ferent “Einstein was on the wrong way: from STR to GTR” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation, he calculated Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong because the gravitational force experienced locally is caused by a negative energy, gravitons energy and the force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference is caused by a positive energy.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong, Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong, LQG, String theory… are wrong theories” Adrian Ferent “Einstein bent the space, Ferent unbent the space” Adrian Ferent 1 “Einstein bent the time, Ferent unbent the time” Adrian Ferent “I am the first who Quantized the Gravitational Field!” Adrian Ferent “I quantized the gravitational field with gravitons” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational field is a discrete function” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational waves are carried by gravitons” Adrian Ferent In STR and GTR there are continuous functions. This is another proof that LIGO is a fraud. The 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded for a project, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) not for a scientific discovery; they did not detect anything because Einstein’s gravitational waves do not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Universe Ringing Like a Crystal Glass? by Tara Burcham, University of Southern Mississippi
    Home / Astronomy & Space / Astronomy JUNE 26, 2015 Is the universe ringing like a crystal glass? by Tara Burcham, University of Southern Mississippi The standard view of the expanding universe. Many know the phrase "the big bang theory." There's even a top television comedy series with that as its title. According to scientists, the universe began with the "big bang" and expanded to the size it is today. Yet, the gravity of all of this matter, stars, gas, galaxies, and mysterious dark matter, tries to pull the universe back together, slowing down the expansion. Now, two physicists at The University of Southern Mississippi, Lawrence Mead and Harry Ringermacher, have discovered that the universe might not only be expanding, but also oscillating or "ringing" at the same time. Their paper on the topic has been published in the April 2015 issue of the Astronomical Journal. In 1978 Arno Allan Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson received the Nobel prize for their 1964 discovery of the key signature of this theory, the primal radiation from the early universe known as the "cosmic microwave background" (CMB). "Then in 1998 the finding that the universe was not only expanding, but was speeding up, or accelerating in its expansion was a shock when it was discovered simultaneously by east coast and west coast teams of astronomers and physicists," said Mead. "A new form of matter, dark energy, repulsive in nature, was responsible for the speed-up. The teams led by Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess, and Brian Schmidt won the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics for that discovery." According to Mead and Ringermacher, this change from slowing down to speeding up (the transition time) took place approximately 6 to 7 billion years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Cosmology and Large Scale Structure
    Neutrino cosmology and large scale structure Christiane Stefanie Lorenz Pembroke College and Sub-Department of Astrophysics University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Trinity 2019 Neutrino cosmology and large scale structure Christiane Stefanie Lorenz Pembroke College and Sub-Department of Astrophysics University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Trinity 2019 The topic of this thesis is neutrino cosmology and large scale structure. First, we introduce the concepts needed for the presentation in the following chapters. We describe the role that neutrinos play in particle physics and cosmology, and the current status of the field. We also explain the cosmological observations that are commonly used to measure properties of neutrino particles. Next, we present studies of the model-dependence of cosmological neutrino mass constraints. In particular, we focus on two phenomenological parameterisations of time-varying dark energy (early dark energy and barotropic dark energy) that can exhibit degeneracies with the cosmic neutrino background over extended periods of cosmic time. We show how the combination of multiple probes across cosmic time can help to distinguish between the two components. Moreover, we discuss how neutrino mass constraints can change when neutrino masses are generated late in the Universe, and how current tensions between low- and high-redshift cosmological data might be affected from this. Then we discuss whether lensing magnification and other relativistic effects that affect the galaxy distribution contain additional information about dark energy and neutrino parameters, and how much parameter constraints can be biased when these effects are neglected.
    [Show full text]