DOCSLIB.ORG

A Sociable Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform (The SHARP Project): an Evaluation of the G.E.N.E.S.I.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Sociable Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform (The SHARP Project): an Evaluation of the G.E.N.E.S.I.S University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2012 A Sociable Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform (the SHARP Project): An evaluation of the G.E.N.E.S.I.S. robot as an interactive consumer robotic platform Jeffrey J. Rick University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2012 Jeffery J. Rick Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Rick, Jeffrey J., "A Sociable Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform (the SHARP Project): An evaluation of the G.E.N.E.S.I.S. robot as an interactive consumer robotic platform" (2012). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 606. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/606 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SOCIABLE HUMANOID AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC PLATFORM (THE SHARP PROJECT): AN EVALUATION OF THE G.E.N.E.S.I.S. ROBOT AS AN INTERACTIVE CONSUMER ROBOTIC PLATFORM An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Jeffrey J Rick University of Northern Iowa July 2012 ABSTRACT The Social Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform (SHARP) project is an android project that was created with the intent of making learning about androids and robotics easier for the novice, diverse for the expert, educational in the classroom, and useful in the home or business. The project centers itself on its simplicity, low cost, and expandability. This paper illustrates how the SHARP Project has the potential to be an affordable fit in nearly every modern setting. The introduction of the SHARP project lays the groundwork for people of many ages, incomes, and educational levels to take advantage of robotics technology. The SHARP project features research based, in part, on a personal android project named "G.E.N.E.S.I.S." as an example of the SHARP project's features. The features of G.E.N.E.S.I.S. include voice recognition, speech synthesis, and responses to various sensor stimuli which help encourage human-robot interaction. This study uses survey results to examine the factors that make these robots desirable to consumers and identifies which factors make some robots more sociable than others. The study concludes with an evaluation of the G.E.N.E.S.I.S. robotic platform and suggests an appropriate market niche for this and other similar sociable humanoid robotic platforms. Keywords: android, human-robot interaction (HRI), sociable robots, humanoid robots, GENESIS, G.E.N.E.S.I.S., SHARP Project A SOCIABLE HUMANOID AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC PLATFORM (THE SHARP PROJECT): AN EVALUATION OF THE G.E.N.E.S.I.S. ROBOT AS AN INTERACTIVE CONSUMER ROBOTIC PLATFORM A Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Jeffrey J Rick University of Northern Iowa July 2012 UMI Number: 1521363 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ttswWioft FtoMstfiriii UMI 1521363 Published by ProQuest LLC 2012. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 This study by: Jeffrey James Rick Entitled: A SOCIABLE HUMANOID AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC PLATFORM (THE SHARP PROJECT): AN EVALUATION OF THE G.E.N.E.S.I.S. ROBOT AS AN INTERACTIVE CONSUMER ROBOTIC PLATFORM has been approved as meeting the thesis requirement for the Degree of Master of Science - Industrial Technology Date Dr. Recayi Pecen, Chair, Thesis Committee Date Dr. Jin Zhu, Thesis Committee Member Date Dr. Dale Olson, Thesis Committee Member Date Dr. Hong (Jeff) Nie, Thesis Committee Member Date Dr. Michael J. Licari, Dean, Graduate College Ill DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this work to my Grandmother M. Dorothy Rick, who has been there for me all of my life, through my hardest and roughest days and most discouraging moments, you were there to pick me up and keep me grounded. You gave me a place to live when I had nowhere else and you gave me food when I was hungry. You had complete confidence in my ability to succeed in my education, my career, and my life's work. You were my best friend and the inspiration for all of the work that follows. You are missed every day of my life and will live always in my heart. Thank you for being the candid, loving, caring, supportive, beautiful woman you have been since my earliest memories. My Beloved Grandmother, until we meet on the other side may Heavenly Father keep you in his grace. Rest in Peace Margaret Dorothy Rick 3/2/1912 - 4/14/2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all of the people who helped me complete this thesis with special consideration to my advisor and friend Dr. Recayi (Reg) Pecen who has given his guidance and support since the first day I set foot on the University of Northern Iowa campus. Also to my committee members Dr. Jin Zhu, Dr. Hong (Jeff) Nie, and Dr. Dale Olson who have stood beside me in my research and opened doors for me that would not have been opened without their support and their input on my work. I would also like to thank Dr. Muhammad Fahmy whose wisdom and compassion for his students has encouraged and inspired me to pursue my goals with persistence and vigor. A special thanks to Dr. James O. Gouge and the members of the Machine Intelligence Technology Beta team who have contributed so much to the development of the technology involved in this research as well as offered me personal guidance and encouragement. My family has been an amazing source of love, support, inspiration and encouragement through every step of my life especially my graduate work; my parents James and Barbara Rick, my grandmother Dorothy, my sister Julie, and my daughters Jordan, Kimberly, and Lisa, from the very bottom of my heart, Thank You! Finally, I would also like to offer a very special Thank-You to my Lord and savior Jesus Christ who has blessed me and sustained me through the trials and tribulations of this work and in my life in general. Without the grace of the Holy Spirit, none of this work would be possible. V TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Statement of Problem 2 Purpose of the Study 3 Need and Justification 4 Research Hypotheses Questions 5 Assumptions 5 Limitations 6 Definition of Terms 6 CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 8 Social Robotics Overview 8 Social Hardware 9 Social Software 10 Theories Involving Social Robots 11 Current Research with Social Robots 13 Uncanny-Valley 16 Summary 18 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 19 Social Humanoid Autonomous Robotic Platform 19 The Survey 21 Sample Analysis 24 The Interactive Face of G.E.N.E.S.I.S 25 Speech and Vocabulary 27 The Machine Intelligence Brain 28 CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS OF DATA 31 Statistical Overview 31 General Respondent Information 31 Interactive Features 34 Personality and Emotions 44 Statistical Analysis of Personality, Emotions, and Conventional vs. Progressive 57 The Human-Robot Environment 63 User Defined Features 72 Results and Discussion 75 CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 81 Summary 81 Hypothesis Findings 83 Conclusions 84 Recommendations for Future Work 88 REFERENCES 91 vii APPENDIX A: HUMAN PARTICIPANTS REVIEW FORM 94 APPENDIX B: INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY SURVEY 95 APPENDIX C: INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY SURVEY COVER LETTER 98 APPENDIX D: FACEBOOK SURVEY INVITATION 99 APPENDIX E: VARIABLES RESEARCHED 100 APPENDIX F: SPSS-PASW MULTIPLE COMPARISON OUTPUT 101 APPENDIX G: INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY SURVEY DATASET 119 viii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 4.1 Interactive Features List 40 4.2 One-Way Personality ANOVA by Age 60 4.3 Multiple Comparison Personality by Occupation 61 4.4 One-Way Consumerl ANOVA by Age 63 4.5 Human-Robot Environment List 65 4.6 One-Way Environment ANOVA by Age 67 4.7 One-Way Environment ANOVA by Occupation 68 4.8 Multiple Comparison LSD Environment by Occupation 70 ix LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1.1 The Uncanny-Valley 17 3.1 Functional Block diagram of the SHARP Project 20 3.2 Servo Placement Map 25 3.3 G.E.N.E.S.I.S. Emotional Expression Example 26 3.4 Machine Intelligence Root Component Layout 30 4.1 Respondent Age Chart 33 4.2 Respondent Occupation Chart 33 4.3 Programs Using Voice Recognition by Age 36 4.4 Programs Using Voice Recognition by Occupation 37 4.5 Programs Using Speech Programs by Age 37 4.6 Programs Using Speech Programs by Occupation 38 4.7 Interactive Features Chart 39 4.8 Artificial Personality Chart by Entire Sample Population 46 4.9 Artificial Personality Chart by Age 47 4.10 Artificial Personality Chart by Occupation 48 4.11 Machine Emotional Expression Chart by Entire Sample Population 49 4.12 Machine Emotional Expression Chart by Age 50 4.13 Machine Emotional Expression Chart by Occupation 51 4.14 Computer Appearance Chart by Entire Sample Population 53 4.15 Computer Appearance Chart by Age 55 X 4.16 Computer Appearance Chart by Occupation 56 4.17 Human-Robot Environment Preference Chart 64 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Background For the last 50 years, computers have played an increasingly integral role in the way people live their lives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statewide Habitat Management FY2018
    IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Virgil Moore, Director Annual Statewide Report Wildlife Restoration Grant Report WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 Prepared by: Dave Leptich ............................................................................................ Panhandle Region Don Jenkins ............................................................................................. Clearwater Region Brad Lowe ................................................................................................ Southwest Region Mark Fleming...................................................................................... Magic Valley Region Anna Owsiak ............................................................................................. Southeast Region Rob Cavallaro ...................................................................................... Upper Snake Region Jesse Shallow ................................................................................................ Salmon Region David Smith ............................................................................................... Grants Specialist Compiled and edited by: Martha Wackenhut, Habitat Program Coordinator and Don Kemner, State Habitat Manager September 2018 Boise, Idaho Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, disability or veteran’s status. If you feel you have been discriminated
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Its Own Agenda for Growth
    manchesTer City Region TheBusinessDesk.com supplemenT | norTh WesT | ocToBer 2013 FEATURING Top 25 high growth companies. 9 A city united by sport. 13 US graphene firm sets up European HQ. 19 Setting its own agenda for growth in association with manchesTer City Region 2 Confidence north West Supplement editoR FoReWoRd october 2013 is key HeRe is a real belief among contents businesses in the Manchester City sponsor forewords: T Tim newns of MidAS; mike rose of Region that better times are around the Santander Corporate & Commercial; corner. After five years of uncertainty Gary houghton of Baker tilly and confidence is returning, be it through stephen chalcraft of Pannone. 3 & 4 ➔ increased M&A activity, investment, job Giving wings to creation or physical development. manchester’s business growth. global connectivity The city region has a number of major strengths: its strong leadership; its is vital to the continued rise business support ecosystem, with the biggest regional legal and financial of the country’s fatest services community outside London; its entrepreneurial culture; diverse growing city. 5 ➔ business sectors and of course the airport. Business appetite for finance returning. Manchester Airports group continues to drive economic growth and is this a sign that broader business out-perform other regional airports. The multi-milllion pound Airport City confidence is on the up? 8 ➔ enterprise Zone development has the potential to be a real game-changer for the city and wider region in terms of wooing international investment. Top 25 high growth companies in Greater manchester. our data table, produced with in property, the Co-operative group’s new flagship headquarters at one experial Corpfin, details the high growth Angel Square completed this year, while number one St Peters Square companies across the ten local authorities of and the Central Library and town Hall redevelopments are to follow the city region.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee
    Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee Scotland’s Screen Sector Written submission from Patricia Duncan I am writing in relation to your open call for written evidence to the above inquiry, in particular the subject of studios and of ‘Infrastructure, Intelligence and Maximising Benefit to Scotland’. In this document, I will initially summarise UK studio development trends, and in context of this analysis, evidence why state aid has become a perceived, rather than actual, barrier to state or local authority investment in screen infrastructure in Scotland. I will subsequently discuss how we can take advantage of present and forthcoming opportunities in the screen and creative industries sector, and propose a viable model for the development of the type of physical space the industry requires. 1. UK studio development trends Studio facility development for the creation of film and television content broadly falls into two categories - new build, or the refurbishment or repurposing of vacant industrial space. 1.1. New build From a new build perspective, UK studio development seems (which I will disprove later in this document) to be private sector driven. Typically, the developer may be an existing studio provider looking to expand their offer using debt or equity financing, or indeed their own resources. Alternatively, it may be a new entrant to the sector speculatively building facilities, and presenting a business proposal that will interest investors on the promise of an attractive yield. The obvious UK industry leader, Pinewood Group Ltd, has an existing global reputation and critical mass in Buckinghamshire on which to build upon, and as an investable entity is very strong, hence the ongoing new build expansion of their site1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee
    Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee Scotland’s Screen Sector inquiry Supplementary written evidence from Film City Glasgow On behalf of our tenants, please accept my thanks to you and the Committee for taking the time to visit Film City Glasgow. The ongoing work of the Committee has been conspicuous and well received by the industry, and I look forward to hearing how your inquiry is progressing. In terms of the discussion we had in relation to infrastructure, despite the challenges the sector has faced in resolving the ‘studio’ question, I believe more now than ever there is a confluence of opportunity that will allow us to create the foundation on which the sector can build. The SSLG report; the creation of the Screen Unit; the doubling of Creative Scotland’s screen budget; the NFTS’s flag in the ground in Scotland; and the FOCUS business development project which Film City is managing; all initiatives that will lead to what I see are the two overriding ambitions for the sector - growth and volume. As you will recall, my presentation to the Committee paid particular attention to infrastructure and the success of Manchester City Council in their delivery of production facilities for the screen and creative industries, primarily through an arms- length organisation MCDA Ltd, which is 100% owned by the local authority. I also drew parallels with Film City Glasgow, and how both our respective projects in Glasgow and Manchester have been founded on the principles of ‘sectoral clustering’ and ‘attracting both indigenous and international productions’ – and both very successfully.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manchester Investment Portfolio 曼彻斯特 投资组合
    THE MANCHESTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO 曼彻斯特 投资组合 Manchester – China Forum is delighted to be able to present this document detailing the tremendous array of investment opportunities in Greater Manchester. The Forum is a business-led initiative aimed at increasing Greater Manchester’s commercial connectivity with China. The forum is led by the following companies: The Forum would like to thank Addleshaw Goddard and Deloitte for their kind support and advice with the production of the Investment Portfolio. This publication has been written in general terms and therefore cannot be relied on to cover Photography courtesy of: specific situations; application of the principles set out will depend upon the particular Becky Lane circumstances involved and it is recommended that you obtain professional advice before acting Rick Grange or refraining from acting on any of the contents of this publication. The Manchester-China Ben Page Forum, its Members and the Sponsors of this document accept no duty of care or liability for any TfGM loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. Deloitte refers to Deloitte LLP, the United Kingdom member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.co.uk/ about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms. © 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 2 New Street Square, London, EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report March 1, 2017
    Board Approved 2/28/2017 ConsolidatedAnnual Report March 1, 2017 Consolidated Annual Report Project Team Overall report coordination, preparation and distribution ----------- Trisha Neasman, Dennis Cockrell Executive Summary - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trisha Neasman Chapter 1. Water Management District Performance Measures Annual Report ------------------Jim Golden Chapter 2. Minimum Flows and Levels Priority List and Schedule ------------------------- Doug Leeper Chapter 3. MFL/Water Quality Grade for Projects ------------------------------------------------ Eric DeHaven Chapter 4. Annual Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan ----------- Cathy Linsbeck, Mike Cacioppo Chapter 5. Alternative Water Supplies Annual Report ---------------------------------------- Anthony Andrade Chapter 6. Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program --------------------------- John Ferguson Chapter 7. Florida Forever Work Plan --------------------------------------------------------------------- Cheryl Hill Chapter 8. Mitigation Donation Annual Report ------------------------------------------------ Michelle Hopkins Chapter 9. 2015-2019 Strategic Plan (updated 2016) and the Annual Work Plan Report -------------------------------------------- Colleen Thayer, Trisha Neasman DI ST RI C T OFFIC E S Brooksville Bartow Sarasota Tampa 2379 Broad Street 170 Century Boulevard 6750 Fruitville Road 7601 Highway 301 North Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Bartow, FL 33830-7700 Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 Tampa,
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester's State of the City Report
    Manchester’s State of the City Report 2011/2012 Prepared by the Manchester Partnership Issue 6: July 2012 Contents Foreword 8 2.4.1 Increasing employment and skills ...................18 2.4.2 Education ������������������������������������������������������19 1 Introduction 10 2.4.3 Living longer, healthier lives ...........................19 1.1 Context ........................................................ 10 2.5 Neighbourhoods of choice .............................19 1.2 The Manchester Partnership ......................... 10 2.5.1 Overview �������������������������������������������������������19 1.3 The Manchester Way – Manchester’s 2.5.2 Satisfaction with the local area ......................19 Community Strategy 2006–15 .........................11 2.5.3 Improving the environment ...........................19 1.3.1 Overview �������������������������������������������������������11 2.5.4 Housing ��������������������������������������������������������19 1.3.2 The spines explained ...................................... 12 2.5.5 Making communities safer ����������������������������19 1.4 Performance management of the Community Strategy Delivery Plan ................. 12 2.6 Individual and collective self-esteem and mutual respect .......................................20 1.5 The Greater Manchester City Region ............. 12 2.6.1 Overview ������������������������������������������������������20 1.5.1 Manchester Independent Economic Review ... 12 2.6.2 Satisfaction with life .....................................20 1.5.2 Greater
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Outside cover 2017.indd 1 01/05/2018 13:02:14 Outside cover 2017.indd 2 01/05/2018 13:02:14 EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT 2017 THE EIGHTY SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted by the Council at its meeting held on 30 April, 2018 for submission to the Annual Representative Conference 20-21 May, 2018 Equity Incorporating the Variety Artistes’ Federation Guild House Upper St Martin’s Lane London WC2H 9EG Tel: 020 7379 6000 Fax: 020 7379 7001 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.equity.org.uk Annual report 2017 cover_contents FINAL.indd 5 01/05/2018 12:56:18 Annual report 2017 cover_contents FINAL.indd 6 01/05/2018 12:56:18 CHAPTERCONTENTS 1: GENERAL A. ANNUAL REPRESENTATIVE CONFERENCE ...............................................................................................................7 B. ELECTIONS & REFERENDUMS ..................................................................................................................................7 C. LOBBYING ACTIVITY ..................................................................................................................................................7 D. MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION .......................................................................................................................8 E. RECRUITMENT & RETENTION ..................................................................................................................................9 F. CLARENCE DERWENT AWARDS ..............................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Sharpfutures Annual Report 2017
    2 FOREWORD 2017 has been an award winning year for SharpFutures: we have won the MPA Inspiring Manchester Award, the Little Chip Apprentice Award, SEUK Highly Commended CEO & have been nominated for many more. It’s wonderful to be recognised for our great apprentices, inspiring work and strong leadership. However what really matters is whether we are making a difference to the community we have set out to serve: are we sourcing from diverse communities? Are we advancing education in creative digital? Are we opening access to talent from a wider social background? Furthermore, how are we more than the sum of our parts? This year we commissioned an independent report created by First Ark, who calculated that every £1 spent with SharpFutures generates £8 in social value. We have proven that we are solving a business need and creating social impact in Manchester – why wouldn’t you book us? This year, grow and invest in POD. Rose Marley CEO 3 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 05 SEED 08 NURTURE 16 GROW 24 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 30 SOCIAL IMPACT AND PERFORMANCE 31 4 INTRODUCTION SharpFutures was formally set up as a social enterprise in 2012 with the purpose of building the capacity of deprived communities through nurturing, educating and growing talent to enhance and expand the creative digital sector in the UK. SharpFutures plays a significant role in promoting the social impact of The Sharp Project and Space Studios, both sites owned by Manchester City Council and managed by Manchester Creative Digital Assets (MCDA). The Sharp Project is a 200,000 square foot hub, home to over 60 digital entrepreneurs and production companies specialising in digital content production, digital media and TV and film production.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Kurt G. Strunk
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-7, SUB 1146 In the Matter of Application of Duke Energy Carolinas, ) LLC, for Adjustment of Rates and Charges ) Applicable to Electric Utility Service in ) North Carolina ) TESTIMONY OF KURT G. STRUNK ON BEHALF OF APPLE INC., FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE LLC (THE “TECH CUSTOMERS”) January 23, 2018 NERA Economic Consulting CONTENTS Contents .....................................................................................................................i I. QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................................1 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................2 III. DEC’S PROPOSED USE OF A RIDER FOR SUCH A LARGE AMOUNT OF TRADITIONAL NETWORK INVESTMENTS SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED...............5 A. DEC has not Distinguished the Power/Forward Carolinas Program from its Other Network Investments.............................................................13 B. DEC’s Power/Forward Carolinas Proposal Threatens to Unbalance the Regulatory Framework...........................................................................18 C. DEC’s Cost/Benefit Analysis of Power/Forward Carolinas is Flawed and Incomplete ................................................................................21 IV. DEC’S REQUESTED COST OF CAPITAL IS OVERSTATED AND INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT ..............................................................................................36 A. Duke Energy Has an Equity
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharp Project Impact Assessment
    The Sharp Project Impact Assessment February 2016 The Sharp Project Target Market The Sharp Project received funding specifically to help grow and build on Overview the creative and digital sector in order to create employment and career The Sharp Project officially opened in 2011 at the former European opportunities in the area. To help create an ecosystem on site which allows distribution centre for Sharp Electronics on Oldham Road, east Manchester, growth of companies in these sectors to develop, and to encourage next to Central Park. It is Manchester City Council’s flagship initiative to collaborative working, companies are admitted in accordance with an support the development of the City’s digital sector. The building was admission policy. completed in June 2011, having received £6.8m of public funding between The policy requires both companies accessing The Sharp Project as 2009 and 2011. permanent tenants and as temporary users to offer complementary or The strategic aim of The Sharp Project is to develop and expand the creative additional services which allow creative companies to develop their skills and digital sector in Manchester through creating work and generating and support their businesses to grow. All prospective tenants are assessed business. The Sharp Project also has a strong focus on developing a to confirm that they are “involved in, or support thereof, the making, balanced ecosystem which supports growth, as companies collaborate as manipulation or moving around the world of digital content in order to make well as compete with each other for business. money and grow the sector”. The scope of the final facility and on-site services emerged through Overall Aims and Objectives extensive consultation with sector representatives to ensure the resulting The Sharp Project’s original aims and objectives were outlined to: facility would effectively support the sector’s growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Greater Manchester Key Facts 2016
    Greater Manchester Key Facts January 2016 POPULATION ECONOMY • 2.73 million people live in Greater Manchester, of which 1.76 • The Greater Manchester economy generates £56 billion of gross million are of working age (16-64). Local authority populations value added (GVA) on an annual basis (e.g. £56 billion of real break down as follows: value produced in the economy, like national GDP), higher than the GVA of the North East (£45 billion), West Yorkshire o Bolton – 280,400 (£46 billion), Merseyside (£27 billion), and accounting for nearly o Bury – 187,500 40% of GVA in the North West. o Manchester – 520,200 • There are 1.4 million people working in Greater Manchester in o Oldham – 228,800 around 105,000 businesses. These businesses can be broken o Rochdale – 213,000 down by employee base as follows: o Salford – 242,000 - Micro, 0-9 employees: 86,100 businesses o Stockport – 286,000 - Small, 10-49 employees: 15,300 businesses o Tameside – 220,800 - Medium, 50-249 employees: 3,400 businesses o Trafford – 232,500 - Large, 250+ employees: 600 businesses o Wigan – 321,000 • Around 110,000 additional jobs are forecast within Greater • The population of Greater Manchester grew by 7.2% (183,100) Manchester for the period 2014–24 by the Greater Manchester between mid-2004 and mid-2014. Economic Forecasting Model (GMFM). • Manchester local authority saw its population grow by 16.9% • GVA is forecast by GMFM to rise by 2.8% per year between 2014 (+75,300) between 2004 and 2014 – more than double the UK and 2024 – in line with the UK figure and above the North West growth rate over the same period (7.8%).
    [Show full text]