Global Shipping Faces Upheaval
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement
2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement The Company’s policy is to participate in public policymaking by informing government officials about our positions on issues significant to the Company and our customers. These issues are discussed in the context of existing and proposed laws, legislation, regulations, and policy initiatives, and include, for example, commerce, intellectual property, trade, data privacy, transportation, and web services. Relatedly, the Company constructively and responsibly participates in the U.S. political process. The goal of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures is to promote the interests of the Company and our customers, and the Company makes such decisions in accordance with the processes described in this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement, without regard to the personal political preferences of the Company’s directors, officers, or employees. Click here for archives of previous statements. Approval Process The Company’s Vice President of Public Policy reviews and approves each political contribution and expenditure made with Company funds or resources to, or in support of, any political candidate, political campaign, political party, political committee, or public official in any country, or to any other organization for use in making political expenditures, to ensure that it is lawful and consistent with the Company’s business objectives and public policy priorities. The Company’s Senior Vice President for Global Corporate Affairs and the Senior Vice President and General Counsel review all political expenditures. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors annually reviews this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement and a report on all of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures, including any contributions made to trade associations or 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations. -
Voters' Pamphlet Has a Shaded Side Bar and Has City of Wilsonville, Councilor
VOTERS’ PAMPHLET NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL ELECTION Important Information Clackamas County Elections Division ● The deadline to register to vote is 1710 Red Soils Court Suite 100 October 16, 2018 to be eligible for a ballot for this election. Oregon City, OR 97045 www.clackamas.us/elections ● All official drop sites in Clackamas 503.655.8510 County are available to the public 24 hours a day from October 17, 2018 until 8 pm on Election Day. (p. C-84) Sherry Hall ● Ballots may be received by 8:00 pm County Clerk on Election Day, November 6, 2018 CLACKAMAS COUNTY Office of the County Clerk SHERRY HALL CLERK 1710 RED SOILS CT, SUITE 100 OREGON CITY, OR 97045 503.655.8510 FAX 503.650.5687 Dear Clackamas County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet contains information designed to assist you in voting: candidates’ statements, ballot titles, explanatory statements, and arguments pertaining to local measures that appear on the November 6, 2018 General Election ballot in Clackamas County. You will not vote on everything that appears in this pamphlet, only those candidate races and measures that appear on the Official Ballot in your Vote-By-Mail packet. In order to vote on a certain measure or race, you must be an active registered voter of the jurisdiction placing the measure on the ballot. Your voted ballot must be received at the Elections Office, 1710 Red Soils Court, Suite 100, in Oregon City or an official ballot drop site by 8:00 p.m. on election night in order to be counted. Remember, the postmark on a mailed ballot does NOT count. -
2012 Political Contributions
2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. -
How the Breathers Beat the Burners: the Policy Market and The
HOW THE BREATHERS BEAT THE BURNERS: THE POLICY MARKET AND THE ROLE OF TECHNICAL, POLITICAL, AND LEGAL CAPITAL IN PURSUING POLICY OUTCOMES. By AARON J. LEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Political Science MAY 2011 To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of AARON J. LEY find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ______________________________ J. Mitchell Pickerill, Ph.D., Co-Chair ______________________________ Cornell W. Clayton, Ph.D., Co-Chair ______________________________ Edward P. Weber, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation was written over a period of three years and the final product would not have been possible if not for the invaluable support from family, friends, mentors, institutions, and colleagues. My dissertation committee deserves first mention. They truly have molded me into the man I am today. Cornell Clayton, Mitch Pickerill, and Ed Weber have not only made me a better scholar, but they‘ve taught me important things about life. My family deserves recognition for the support and encouragement I have received throughout the years. Mom and Dad, when the going got tough I thought about how proud you both would be after I finished this project – these dreams are your‘s and mine that time can‘t take away. Todd and Allison, thanks for giving me a place to focus my eyes on the catalyst and stand high in the middle of South Minneapolis. Wade Ley deserves special mention for his qualitative research assistance about the Pacific Northwest hop industry in Seattle, Portland, and Spokane during Spring 2010. -
June 22, 2020 Senate President Peter Courtney House Speaker Tina Kotek Oregon State Capitol 900 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97
June 22, 2020 Senate President Peter Courtney House Speaker Tina Kotek Oregon State Capitol 900 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 Sent via email Re: Statutory Corrections to the Corporate Activity Tax (H.B. 4009-A, 2020) Dear Senate President Courtney and House Speaker Kotek, On behalf of the Smart Growth Coalition and Council On State Taxation (C.O.S.T.), we are writing to express our continued concerns regarding statutory ambiguities complicating the implementation of the corporate activity tax (C.A.T.) and the crucial need for corrective legislation in the upcoming special session. To be clear, we are not asking for delaying the implementation or changing the structural design of the tax, but to enact clarifying amendments proposed during the 2020 session. While our organizations approached the enabling legislation differently, we are aligned in our commitment to working alongside the executive and legislative branches to ensure the C.A.T. functions as intended by the legislature. Through the development of the rules and regulations, however, it has become clear there are significant statutory ambiguities regarding the statutory subtraction, filing groups, and filing period. These provisions are inherently technical but represent the underpinnings required for every taxpayer to calculate the tax, and, thus, pose significant administrative and compliance obstacles without clarification. During the 2020 session, we worked closely with a technical working group to identify and recommend corrective measures to simplify the administrative and compliance burdens. Together with the Oregon Department of Revenue (“Department”) and Legislative Revenue Office, we agreed to a series of statutory corrections designed to resolve the known ambiguities. -
Agenda Item B.1 Situation Summary April 2013 FORMALIZATION OF
Agenda Item B.1 Situation Summary April 2013 FORMALIZATION OF COUNCIL DECISIONS AT THE MARCH COUNCIL MEETING The Federal Register (FR) notice for the March 2013 meeting was filed late, and based on guidance from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration General Counsel, all Council decisions at the March 2013 meeting were considered “Preliminary Selections” to be formalized under a specific agenda item at the April, 2013 Council meeting. There were two exceptions: Agenda Items C.6, Adoption of 2013 Management Alternatives for Public Review, and C.7, Salmon Hearings Officers, which were noticed earlier in a separate FR notice associated with finalizing Amendment 17 to the Salmon Fishery Management Plan. Attachment 1 is a list of all Council Motions in need of formalization. Attachment 2 is the March Decision Summary Document, which includes some Council decisions that were not in the form of a motion, such as guidance on future agenda and workload planning. Council Action: 1. Formally confirm Council decisions made as preliminary selections at the March 2013 Council meeting, contained in Attachments 1 and 2. Reference Materials: 1. Agenda Item B.1.a, Attachment 1: Draft Voting Log, Pacific Fishery Management Council, 217th Meeting, March 2013. 2. Agenda Item B.1.a, Attachment 2: Decision Summary Document, Pacific Fishery Management Council, March 7-11, 2013. Agenda Order: a. Agenda Item Overview Don McIsaac b. Reports and Comments of Advisory Bodies and Management Entities c. Public Comment d. Council Action: Approve Preliminary -
Testimony from the Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association in Support of House Bill 2560
March 4, 2021 House Democratic Leader Barbara Smith Warner, Chair House Republican Leader Christine Drazan, Vice-Chair Representative Paul Holvey, Vice-Chair House Committee On Rules Salem, OR 97301 RE: Testimony from the Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association in Support of House Bill 2560 Dear Chair Smith Warner, Vice Chair Drazan, Vice Chair Holvey, and Members of the Committee: The Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association (OAPA) supports the passage of HB 2560. Passage of this bill will increase equitable access to public meetings and hearings by requiring all such meetings to be accessible remotely (when reasonably feasible) and allowing the general public to remotely provide oral and written testimony when such testimony is allowed. OAPA is an independent, statewide, not-for-profit educational organization of more than 800 planners from across the state who work for cities, counties, special districts, state agencies, tribes, community-based organizations, universities, and private firms. We provide leadership in the development of vital communities by advocating excellence in community planning, promoting education and resident empowerment, and providing the tools and support necessary to meet the challenges of growth and change. OAPA supports sustainable communities and works to enhance the quality of life for current and future generations by helping to create and stabilize places that are equitable, healthy, and resilient and provide ongoing economic, environmental, and social benefits. HB 2560 supports two of OAPA’s 2021 Legislative Priorities: “Advocate For Oregon’s Planning Program” and “Advance Racial Equity.” The bill will advance inclusion and expand opportunity for participation at all phases of the planning process as envisioned by Statewide Planning Goal 1, which calls for “the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process.” Increasing access and opportunities for participation can help elevate the voices of traditionally underrepresented communities. -
House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent Issues Will Get Dedicated Attention in New Committees
OFFICE OF THE HOUSE SPEAKER 900 Court St., N.E., Room H-269 Salem OR 97301 http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/kotek NEWS RELEASE December 31, 2020 Danny Moran, 503-986-1204 [email protected] House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent issues will get dedicated attention in new committees SALEM – Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek on Thursday announced House committees for the 2021 Legislative Session. In addition to the standard policy and budget committees, the Oregon House of Representatives will have new committees in the upcoming session to address timely issues, including wildfire recovery, redistricting, institutional reform of the Legislature, as well as subcommittees focusing on COVID-19 response, equitable policing and the return of a policy committee dedicated to early childhood issues. “Oregonians are facing crises that demand urgent action. The House is ready to lead on the issues that matter most in people’s lives right now. We also need to create the space to have a focused conversation about long-term, transformational changes to modernize the people’s legislature,” Speaker Kotek said. “I’m grateful for the diverse perspectives that my colleagues will bring as we all work together to help Oregonians navigate the big challenges that lie ahead.” Speaker Kotek communicated directly with every returning and new member of the Oregon House of Representatives before deciding on committee assignments, taking the time to weigh and discuss their priorities, interests and notable experience. She also consulted with both caucus leaders before finalizing the assignments. The House will convene on Monday, January 11 to swear in members. -
OREGON STATE SENATORS and REPRESENTATIVES 2019 Legislative Session * Denotes That Only a Few City Precincts Are Located in That District
OREGON STATE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES 2019 Legislative Session * Denotes that only a few city precincts are located in that district SENATE HOUSE D: 18 R: 12 D: 38 R: 22 City Senator(s) District Representative(s) District Adair Village Brian Boquist (R) 12 Mike Nearman (R) 23 Adams Bill Hansell (R) 29 Greg Barreto (R) 58 Adrian Cliff Bentz (R ) 30 Lynn Findley (R) 60 Albany Sara Gelser (D) 8 Shelly Boshart Davis (R) 15 Amity Brian Boquist (R) 12 Mike Nearman (R) 23 Antelope Bill Hansell (R) 29 Greg Smith (R) 57 Arlington Bill Hansell (R) 29 Greg Smith (R) 57 Ashland Jeff Golden (D) 3 Pam Marsh (D) 5 Astoria Betsy Johnson (D) 16 Tiffiny Mitchell (D) 32 Athena Bill Hansell (R) 29 Greg Barreto (R) 58 Aumsville Denyc Boles (R) 10 Raquel Moore-Green (R) 19 Aurora Fred Girod (R) 9 Rick Lewis (R) 18 Baker City Cliff Bentz (R ) 30 Lynn Findley (R) 60 Bandon Dallas Heard (R) 1 David Brock Smith (R) 1 Banks Betsy Johnson (D) 16 Tiffiny Mitchell (D) 32 Barlow Alan Olsen (R) 20 Christine Drazan (R) 39 Bay City Betsy Johnson (D) 16 Tiffiny Mitchell (D) 32 Beaverton Mark Hass (D) 14 Sheri Schouten (D) 27 Elizabeth Steiner Jeff Barker (D) 28 17 Hayward (D) Mitch Greenlick (D) 33 Ginny Burdick (D) 18 Ken Helm (D) 34 Margaret Doherty (D) 35 Bend Tim Knopp (R) 27 Cheri Helt (R) 54 Boardman Bill Hansell (R) 29 Greg Smith (R) 57 City Senator(s) District Representative(s) District Bonanza Dennis Linthicum (R) 28 Werner Reschke (R) 56 Brookings Dallas Heard (R) 1 David Brock Smith (R) 1 Brownsville Lee Beyer (D) 6 Marty Wilde (D) 11 Burns Cliff Bentz (R ) 30 Lynn Findley (R) 60 Butte Falls Dennis Linthicum (R) 28 55 Vacant Seat Canby Alan Olsen (R) 20 Christine Drazan (R) 39 Cannon Beach Betsy Johnson (D) 16 Tiffiny Mitchell (D) 32 Canyon City Cliff Bentz (R ) 30 Lynn Findley (R) 60 Canyonville Dallas Heard (R) 1 Gary Leif (R) 2 Carlton Brian Boquist (R) 12 Ron Noble (R) 24 Cascade Locks Chuck Thomsen (R) 26 Anna Williams (D) 52 Cave Junction Herman Baertschiger Jr. -
Members of the Washington State Legislature
State of Washington Members of the Legislature 1889-2019 Members of the Washington State Legislature ͳͺͺͻ౮Ȃ౮ʹͲͳͻ This edition of the Members of the Legislature is available from: Legislative Information Center 110 Legislative Building P.O. Box 40500 Olympia, WA 98504-0500 Legislative : www.leg.wa.gov/lic E-mail: [email protected] In accordance with RCW 42.56.070, this report is available at a fee based on actual reproduction costs. ǯϐ ȋ͵ͲȌͺǦͷͷͲǤ State of Washington Members of the State Legislature By Districts Since 1889 (With Name Index) Revised and Published by: Brad Hendrickson, Secretary of the Senate Bernard C. Dean, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives F EBRUARY 2019 History of Publication 1. Originally compiled and published in 1962 by S.R. Holcomb, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 2. Revised and published in 1966 by Sid Snyder, Acting Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 3. Revised and published in 1978 by Sid Snyder, Secretary of the Senate, and Dean Foster, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 4. Revised and published in 1987 by Sid Snyder, Secretary of the Senate, and Dennis L. Heck, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 5. Revised and published in 1991 by Gordon A. Golob, Secretary of the Senate, and Alan Thompson, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 6. Revised and published in 1997 by Mike O’Connell, Secretary of the Senate, and Timothy A. Martin, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives; 7. Revised and published in 1999 by Tony Cook, Secretary of the Senate, and Dean Foster, Co-Chief Clerk, House of Representatives, and Timothy A. -
CSG West Western Legislative Academy Alumni 2000–2017
CSG West Western Legislative Academy Alumni 2000–2017 ALASKA Sen. Bert Stedman-06 Fmr. Sen. Tom O’Halleran-02 Rep. Joann Ginal-14 Fmr. Rep. Bob Buch-09 Sen. Gary Stevens-01 Fmr. Sen. Lynne Pancrazi-10 Sen. Kevin Grantham-11 Rep. Matt Claman-15 Rep. Dave Talerico-15 Fmr. Sen. Jonathon Paton-07 Fmr. Rep. Dale Hall-06 Sen. John Coghill, Jr.-02 Rep. Geran Tarr-15 Fmr. Rep. Daniel Patterson-10 Rep. Millie Hamner-12 Sen. Mia Costello-11 Fmr. Sen. Joe Thomas-09 Sen. Frank Pratt-12 Rep. Chris Hansen - 17 Fmr. Rep. Eric Croft-00 Fmr. Rep. William Thomas, Jr.-06 Rep. Macario Saldate IV-12 Fmr. Sen. Mary Hodge-02 Fmr. Rep. Nancy Dahlstrom-04 Rep. Steve Thompson-12 Rep. Thomas T.J. Shope-13 Fmr. Sen. Evie Hudak-10 Rep. Harriet Drummond-16 Rep. Cathy Tilton-15 Fmr. Rep. David Smith-11 The late Sen. Jim Isgar-04 Rep. Bryce Edgmon-10 Rep. Chris Tuck-12 Fmr. Rep. Victoria Steele -13 Sen. Cheri Jahn-04 Fmr. Rep. Hugh “Bud” Fate-02 Fmr. Sen. Thomas Wagoner-03 Fmr. Sen. Thayer Verschoor-03 Fmr. Rep. Ramey Johnson-03 Fmr. Rep. Eric Feige-13 Sen. Bill Wielechowski-09 Fmr. Rep. Ted Vogt-11 Fmr. Rep. Janak Joshi-11 Rep. Neal Foster-11 Fmr. Sen. Gary Wilken-00 Fmr. Sen. Kelli Ward-13 Sen. John M. Kefalas-10 Fmr. Rep. Lynn Gattis-14 Fmr. Rep. Peggy Wilson-01 Fmr. Sen. Jim Waring-04 Fmr. Rep. James J. Kerr-06 The late Rep. Carl Gatto-06 Fmr. Rep. Rae Waters-09 Rep. -
We2.0 Washington Education Association Volume 50, Number 3 – Summer 2012
we2.0 Washington Education Association Volume 50, Number 3 – Summer 2012 2012 ELECTION A vote for our future “His first opportunity to get involved in politics started as a parent in the Selah School District to fight for education. … If you compare Jay Inslee to the other candidate who is running, he understands people. He understands fighting for and allowing us to preserve our collective bargaining rights. … Who’s going to be able to protect our bargaining rights and be able to allow us to fight for kids?” Kendell Millbauer Middle school social studies teacher Richland Summer 2012 1 am an optimist. I think I inherited my glass- Our compensation, up for discussion next half-full tendencies alongside the educator legislative session, is a good illustration of the geneI that runs in my family. And I have to say, it’s linkage between funding and policy. Back in 2009, come in handy lately. I’ve been working in public the Quality Education Council set the road map education for 42 years, and I’ve never experienced a for education policy and funding in motion. It From year quite like this — the pace has accelerated, the was reaffirmed by the Legislature in 2010, and the demands are high, the issues relentless. McCleary decision cites these steps as legislative intent regarding funding. Mary I know you feel it too. As I’ve been out visiting with councils Meaning money and reforms and members this fall, everyone ‘We care so much are linked, and how those play has been talking about Chicago, forward relies on the people we “Won’t Back Down,” the about this election elect.