No. 11848 MULTILATERAL Madrid Agreement for the Repression Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No. 11848 MULTILATERAL Madrid Agreement for the Repression Of No. 11848 MULTILATERAL Madrid Agreement for the repression of false or deceptive in dications of source on goods of April 14, 1891, revised at Washington on June 2,1911, at The Hague on Novem ber 6,1925, at London on June 2,1934,, and at Lisbon on October 31, 1938. Done at Lisbon on 31 October 1958 Additional Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967 to the above- mentioned Agreement. Done at Stockholm on 14 July 1967 Authentic texts: French. Registered by the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organiza tion, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 30 June 1972. MULTILATÉRAL Arrangement de Madrid concernant la répression des indica tions de provenance fausses ou fallacieuses du 14 avril 1891 revisé à Washington le 2 juin 1911, à La Haye le 6 novembre 192;5, à Londres le 2 juin 1934 et à Lisbonne le 31 octobre 1958. Conclu à Lisbonne le 31 octobre 1958 Acte de Stockholm du 14 juillet 1967 additionnel à l'Arrange ment susmentionné. Conclu à Stockholm le 14 juillet 1967 Textes authentiques .-français. Enregistrés par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle, agissant au nom des parties, le 30 juin 1972. 1972______Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités_______165 [TRANSLATION 1 TRADUCTION2] MADRID AGREEMENT FOR THE REPRESSION OF FALSE OR DECEPTIVE INDICATIONS OF SOURCE ON GOODS OF APRIL 14, 1891,3 REVISED AT WASHINGTON ON JUNE 2, 1911,4 AT THE HAGUE ON NOVEMBER 6, 1925,5 AT LONDON ON JUNE 2, 1934,6 AND AT LISBON ON OCTOBER 31, 19587 Article 1 (1) All goods bearing a false or deceptive indication by which one of the countries to which this Agreement applies, or a place situated therein, is 1 Translation supplied by the World Intellectual Property Organization. 2 Traduction fournie par l©Organisation mondiale de la propri t intellectuelle. 3 British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 96, p. 837. 4 Ibid., vol. 104, p. 137. 5 League of Nations, Treaty Series, vol. LXXIV, p. 319. 6 Ibid., vol. CXCII, p. 9. 7 Came into force on 1 June 1963 between the following countries, which had deposited their instrument of ratification with the Government of Switzerland, or whose application for accession had been notified by the latter by 1 May 1963 at the latest, in accordance with article 6 (1) and (2): Date of deposit of the instrument of ratification, or of notification Country of application for accession (a} France ..................................................... 24 March 1961 (With a declaration to the effect that the ratification shall apply to all the territories of the French Republic: Metropolitan Depart ments, Algerian Departments, Departments of the Sahara, Depart ments of Guadeloupe, Guyana, Martinique and Reunion, and Overseas Territories.) Federal Republic of Germany ................................. 28 July 1961 (With a declaration to the effect that the Agreement shall also apply to Land Berlin with effect from the day it will come into force for the Federal Republic of Germany.X1) Czechoslovakia.............................................. 12 August 1961a Monaco .................................................... 2 September 1961 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .......... 6 {September 1961 (With the following declaration: "With regard to the International Agreement for the Suppres sion of False Indications of Origin on Goods, the Embassy have the honour to declare that, in the view of Her Majesty©s Govern ment, the United Kingdom, by its present legislation, gives full and complete effect to the Arrangement of Madrid as revised at Lisbon on the 31st of October, 1958, and l:hat the United Kingdom domes tic legislation does not impair this Arrangement in any way.") Switzerland ................................................. 25 June 1962 (©) The following countries notified the Government of Switzerland of the communications by which they objected to the declaration by the Federal Republic of Germany: Cuba, Czecho slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania. Subsequently, the Agreement came into force in each of the following countries after the notifica tion by the Government of Switzerland of the deposit of its instrument of accession, in accordance with article 6 (1) and (2): (Continued mpage m N" 11848 1972 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 167 directly or indirectly indicated as being the country or place of origin shall be seized on importation into any of the said countries. (2) Seizure shall also be effected in the country where the false or deceptive indication of source has been applied, or into which the goods bearing the false or deceptive indication have been imported. (3) If the laws of a country do not permit seizure upon importation, such seizure shall be replaced by prohibition of importation. (Footnote 7 continued from page 165) Date of notification Country of the accession Date of entry into force Algeria ............................. 5 April 1972 5 July 1972(©) Cuba............................... 11 September 1964 11 October 1964 German Democratic Republic ......... 15 December 1964(2) 15 January 1965 Hungary............................ 23 February 1967 23 March 1967 (With the following declaration: [Translation—Traduction] With re gard to article 5 (2) of the Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods or 14 April 1891, revised at Washington on 2 June 1911, at the Hague on 6 November 1925, at London on 2 June 1934, and at Lisbon on 31 Oc tober 1958, the Presidential Council of the Hungarian People©s Republic wishes to state that it adheres to the principles embodied in the Declaration adopted on 14 December 1960(3;i by the United Nations General Assembly guaranteeing the independence of colonial countries and peoples. Ac cordingly, the Presidential Council of the Hungarian People©s Republic considers that colonialism, in any of its forms and manifestations, is contrary to existing international law.) Ireland ............................. 9 May 1967 9 June 1967 Israel............................... 2 June 1967 2 July 1967 Italy ............................... 29 November 1968 29 December 1968 Japan .............................. 21 July 1965 21 August 1965 Liechtenstein ....................... 10 March 1972 10 April 1972 Morocco............................ 15 April 1967 15 May 1967 Sweden............................. 3 September 1969 3 October 1969 (©) The date of entry into force, in respect of Algeria, of the Additional Act of Stockholm of 14 July 1967 to the above-me:ntioned Madrid Agreement (see p. 177 of this volume). (*) The Governments of the following States have sent communications to the depositary to the effect that they objected to that instrument: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Central African Republic, Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany, France, Greece, Haiti, Holy See, Iceland, Iran, Ireland, Ivory Coast, Japan, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Nether lands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Viet Nairn, San Marino, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America. (3) United Nations, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifteenth Session, Supple ment No. 16 (A/4684), p. 66. N 11848 1972______Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités________169 (4) If the laws of a country permit neither seizure upon importation nor prohibition of importation nor seizure within the country, then, until such time as the laws are modified accordingly, those measures shall be replaced by the actions and remedies available in such cases to nationals under the laws of such country. (5) In the absence of any special sanctions ensuring the repression of false or deceptive indications of source, the sanctions provided by the corresponding provisions of the laws relating to marks or trade names shall be applicable. Article 2 (1) Seizure shall take place at the instance of the customs authorities, who shall immediately inform the interested party, v/hether an individual person or a legal entity, in order that such party may, if he so desires, take appropriate steps in connection with the seizure effected as a conservatory measure. However, the public prosecutor or any other competent authority may demand seizure either at the request of the injuced party or ex officio; the procedure shall then follow its normal course. (2) The authorities shall not be bound to effect seizure in the case of transit. Article 3 These provisions shall not prevent the vendor from indicating his name or address upon goods coming from a country other than that in which the sale takes place; but in such case the address or the name must be accom panied by an exact indication in clear characters of the country or place of manufacture or production, or by some other indication sufficient to avoid any error as to the true source of the wares. Article 3bis The countries to which this Agreement applies also undertake to pro hibit the use, in connection with the sale or display or offering for sale of any goods, of all indications in the nature of publicity capable of deceiving the public as to the source of the goods, and appearing on signs, advertise ments, invoices, wine lists, business letters or papers, or any other com mercial communication. Article 4 The courts of each country shall decide what appellations, on account of their generic character, do not fall within the provisions of this Agr a it 11848 1972 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 171 ment, r gional appellations concerning the source of products of the vine being, however, excluded from the reservation specified by this Article. Article 5 (1) Countries of the Union for the Protection of Industrial Property which have not acceded to this Agreement may accede at their request in the manner prescribed by Article 16 of the General Convention. 1 (2) The provisions of Articles 16 bis and 17 bis of the General Conven tion shall apply to this Agreement. Article 6 (1) This Act shall be ratified and the instruments of ratification depo sited at Berne not later than May 1, 1963. It shall come into force, between the countries in whose names it has been ratified, one month after that date.
Recommended publications
  • 19-292 Torres V. Madrid (03/25/2021)
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus TORRES v. MADRID ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No. 19–292. Argued October 14, 2020—Decided March 25, 2021 Respondents Janice Madrid and Richard Williamson, officers with the New Mexico State Police, arrived at an Albuquerque apartment com- plex to execute an arrest warrant and approached petitioner Roxanne Torres, then standing near a Toyota FJ Cruiser. The officers at- tempted to speak with her as she got into the driver’s seat. Believing the officers to be carjackers, Torres hit the gas to escape. The officers fired their service pistols 13 times to stop Torres, striking her twice. Torres managed to escape and drove to a hospital 75 miles away, only to be airlifted back to a hospital in Albuquerque, where the police ar- rested her the next day. Torres later sought damages from the officers under 42 U. S. C. §1983. She claimed that the officers used excessive force against her and that the shooting constituted an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Affirming the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to the officers, the Tenth Circuit held that “a suspect’s continued flight after being shot by police negates a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim.” 769 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States – Three Years on by Jason M
    K THE MADRID PROTOCOL – AN INDUSTRY VIEW The United States – three years on By Jason M. Vogel of Kilpatrick Stockton he United States joined the Madrid Union are Canada, Mexico, most of Latin Protocol on 2 November 2003. America, New Zealand, South Africa, TAlthough adoption by U.S. trademark Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, the owners of this multinational trademark Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Israel, India registration system was perhaps a bit slow and Pakistan, although there are efforts initially, the U.S. now represents the third underway in many of these countries to join. largest user of the system, with over 2800 The process of filing for an International international applications filed in 2005, or 8.5% Registration (“IR”) under this system can be of the total of 33,565 applications filed that tricky. As an initial matter, the Madrid year.1 This article, will explain the nuts and system is only available to individuals or bolts of how the system works, and provide legal entities that are nationals of, are some practice pointers for deciding when to domiciled in, or have a real and effective use the system and how to avoid common commercial or industrial establishment in, a pitfalls that are endemic to the system. country that is a member of the Madrid The “Madrid Protocol Relating to the Union. Such country in which the Madrid Agreement Concerning the international applicant qualifies for International Registration of Marks,” was participation in the Madrid system is adopted in June 1989 as an outgrowth of an referred to as the applicant’s “Country of 1891 trademark treaty entitled the “Madrid Origin.” For U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the International Registration of Marks Under the Madrid
    2018 Guide to the International Registration of Marks under the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol Guide to the International the Registration Marks MadridGuide to under the of Agreement Madrid and the Protocol World Intellectual Property Organization © WIPO, 2018 34, chemin des Colombettes Attribution 3.0 IGO license P.O. Box 18 (CC BY 3.0 IGO) CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland The CC license does not apply to non-WIPO content in this publication. Tel: + 41 22 338 91 11 Printed in Switzerland Fax: + 41 22 733 54 28 For contact details of WIPO’s External Offices visit: WIPO Publication No. 455E18 www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/offices/ ISBN 978-92-805-2904-3 GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL (updated 2018) World Intellectual Property Organization GENEVA 2018 ii GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS Complementary information can be obtained from Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland Tel.: (+41) 022 338 9111 Contact us: www.wipo.int/madrid/en/contact/ Internet: www.wipo.int WIPO PUBLICATION No. 455(E) ISBN 978-92-805-2904-3 WIPO 2018 GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS iii PREFACE This Guide is primarily intended for applicants for, and holders of, international registrations of marks, as well as officials of the competent administrations of the member States of the Madrid Union. It leads them through the various steps of the international registration procedure and explains the essential provisions of the Madrid Agreement, the Madrid Protocol and the Common Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Chinese Services Group Co-Leader
    Luxembourg The European hub for China Table of contents Foreword: Why Luxembourg for China? 3 Luxembourg at a glance 4 Opportunities between China and Luxembourg 8 Deloitte Luxembourg - your trusted advisor 22 Acknowledgement 26 Contacts 28 2 Foreword: Why Luxembourg for China? Luxembourg Grand Duchy has an old saying In recent years, Luxembourg has progressively gained “Small is beautiful”. recognition as a key hub for cross-border renminbi business in the eurozone: it is the leading European Although Luxembourg is one of the world's smallest centre for renminbi payments, deposits and loans, sovereign states, it has been successful in attracting renminbi investment funds, and the listing mainland China-based investors, banks, multinational of Dim Sum bonds. corporations, state-owned enterprises, sovereign wealth funds and high net worth individuals seeking to Six large Chinese banks have chosen to establish their establish or expand their business in Europe through a European headquarters in Luxembourg and thereby multi-advantageous platform. We will describe some of selected Luxembourg as a hub for their European the many advantages in this brochure. operations. Leveraging the European Passport, these banks are able to serve the entire EU from Luxembourg, Luxembourg is the perfect gateway for Chinese taking advantage of its business and Chinese-friendly outbound activities, irrespective of their regulatory regulatory and governmental environment. profile. It is the world's second-largest fund centre (after the United States), the global leader in cross-border fund Going forward, we expect Luxembourg and China to distribution, and a long-established fund domicile continue to strengthen their relationships, to the mutual for investment flows into and out of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Dispossession, Income and Immigration in Las Palmas De Gran Canaria (Spain)
    Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (87) eISSN: 2605-3322 How to cite this work: Parreño Castellano, J. M., Domínguez-Mujica, J., Moreno-Medina, C. (2020). Real estate dispossession, income and immigration in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain). Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (87). https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.3000 Real estate dispossession, income and immigration in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) Desposesión inmobiliaria, renta e inmigración en Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España) Juan Manuel Parreño Castellano [email protected] Josefina Domínguez-Mujica [email protected] Claudio Moreno-Medina [email protected] Departamento de Geografía University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) Abstract The legal proceedings of real estate dispossession are essential elements in understanding the impact of the economic crisis on Spanish cities. Those that took place between 2009 and 2017 in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, their quantitative dimension and their intra-urban distribution are analysed in this study. This perspective allows an appreciation of their relationship with the unequal distribution of income and alien status, factors leading the investigations on the loss of property. In order to achieve this objective, the records of the Common Service of Notifications and Seizures have been used together with data of the Inland Revenue Ministry and Municipal Register, combining statistical and cartographical analysis with the purpose of finding associations Received: 07.06.2020 Accepted: 23.08.2020 Published: 19.11.2020 Published under the terms and conditions of an Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. and predictive factors. The study reveals that there is a great concentration of real estate deprivation in the central areas of the city and that the standards of distribution of dispossession are inversely related to the level of income of the urban districts and directly related to the foreign population.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Stockholm & Brussels 1911 & 1912: a Feminist
    1 16. STOCKHOLM & BRUSSELS 1911 & 1912: A FEMINIST INTERNATIONAL? You must realize that there is not only the struggle for woman Suffrage, but that there is another mighty, stormy struggle going on all over the world, I mean the struggle on and near the labour market. Marie Rutgers-Hoitsema 1911 International Woman Suffrage Alliance (IWSA) became effective because it concentrated on one question only. The Alliance (it will be the short word for the IWSA) wanted to show a combatant and forceful image. It was of importance to have many followers and members. Inside the Alliance, there was no room to discuss other aspect of women's citizenship, only the political. This made it possible for women who did not want to change the prevalent gender division of labor to become supporters. The period saw an increase of the ideology about femininity and maternity, also prevalent in the suffrage movement. But some activists did not stop placing a high value on the question of woman's economic independence, on her economic citizenship. They wanted a more comprehensive emancipation because they believed in overall equality. Some of these feminists took, in Stockholm in 1911, the initiative to a new international woman organization. As IWSA once had been planned at an ICW- congress (in London in 1899) they wanted to try a similar break-out-strategy. IWSA held its sixth international congress in June in the Swedish capital. It gathered 1 200 delegates.1 The organization, founded in opposition to the shallow enthusiasm for suffrage inside the ICW, was once started by radical women who wanted equality with men.
    [Show full text]
  • In Airplane and Ferry Passenger Stories in the Northern Baltic Sea Region
    VARSTVOSLOVJE, Risk, Safety and Freedom of Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, year 18 Movement: no. 2 pp. 175‒193 In Airplane and Ferry Passenger Stories in the Northern Baltic Sea Region Sophia Yakhlef, Goran Basic, Malin Åkerström Purpose: The purpose of this study is to map and analyse how travellers at an airport and on ferries experience, interpret and define the risk, safety and freedom of movement in the northern part of the Baltic Sea region with regard to the border agencies. Design/Methods/Approach: This qualitative study is based on empirically gathered material such as field interviews and fieldwork observations on Stockholm’s Arlanda airport in Sweden, and a Tallink Silja Line ferry running between Stockholm and Riga in Latvia. The study’s general starting point was an ethno-methodologically inspired perspective on verbal descriptions along with an interactionist perspective which considers interactions expressed through language and gestures. Apart from this starting point, this study focused on the construction of safety as particularly relevant components of the collected empirical material. Findings: The study findings suggest that many passengers at the airport and on the ferries hold positive views about the idea of the freedom of movement in Europe, but are scared of threats coming from outside Europe. The travellers created and re-created the phenomenon of safety which is maintained in contrast to others, in this case the threats from outside Europe. Originality/Value: The passengers in this study construct safety by distinguishing against the others outside Europe but also through interaction with them. The passengers emphasise that the freedom of movement is personally beneficial because it is easier for EU citizens to travel within Europe but, at the same time, it is regarded as facilitating the entry of potential threats into the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsyas in the Garden?
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Opuscula: Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Habetzeder, J. (2010) Marsyas in the garden?: Small-scale sculptures referring to the Marsyas in the forum Opuscula: Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome, 3: 163-178 https://doi.org/10.30549/opathrom-03-07 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-274654 MARSYAS IN THE GARDEN? • JULIA HABETZEDER • 163 JULIA HABETZEDER Marsyas in the garden? Small-scale sculptures referring to the Marsyas in the forum Abstract antiquities bought in Rome in the eighteenth century by While studying a small-scale sculpture in the collections of the the Swedish king Gustav III. This collection belongs today Nationalmuseum in Stockholm, I noticed that it belongs to a pre- to the Nationalmuseum in Stockholm. It is currently being viously unrecognized sculpture type. The type depicts a paunchy, thoroughly published and a number of articles on the col- bearded satyr who stands with one arm raised. To my knowledge, four lection have previously appeared in Opuscula Romana and replicas exist. By means of stylistic comparison, they can be dated to 3 the late second to early third centuries AD. Due to their scale and ren- Opuscula. dering they are likely to have been freestanding decorative elements in A second reason why the sculpture type has not previ- Roman villas or gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, Ms. Lorena Rojas
    Ref. Ares(2019)5743277 - 13/09/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION S ECRETARI АТ-GEN ERAL Directorate E - Single Market & Connectivity SG.E.l-Competitivencss, Innovation & Digital Europe Brussels, SG.E.l/OG/OC By registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt Ms. Lorena Rojas Paz C. Juan Bravo, 63. Madrid 28006 Advance copy by email: ask+req uest-7177- [email protected] Dear Madam, Subject: Your application for access to documents - Ref GestDem No 2019/4465 We refer to your email of 31/07/2019 in which you submit a request for access to documents, registered on 01/08/2019 under the above mentioned reference numbers. You request access for the period between from 1 January 2014 onwards to: - a list of all lobby meetings held by any member of your team/staff, including the First Vice-president Frans Timmermans or any other member of its Cabinet, with EURATEX; - all emails, minutes, reports, briefing papers or other documents received or drawn up before, during or after the meetings. Pursuant your application we have identified the following documents: Ares(2017)990117 - Breakfast meeting with the Alliance for a Competitive European Industry - 23 February 2017; Ares(2018) 189876 - Minutes of the meeting with Industry4europe, 11 January, 2018; The documents to which you request access contain personal data, in particular email addresses and phone numbers. Indeed, Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/1725 provides that personal data ‘means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person [...]’. The Court of Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELG1QUE/BELG1Ë - Tel. +32 22991111 Office: BERL 06/161 - Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Christina's Esoteric Interests As a Background to Her
    SUSANNA ÅKERMAN Queen Christina’s Esoteric Interests as a Background to Her Platonic Academies n 1681 the blind quietist, Francois Malaval, stated that Queen Christina of Sweden late in life had ‘given up’ [Hermes] Trismegistos and the IPlatonists, in favour of the Church fathers. The statement does not ex- plain what role the Church fathers were to play in her last years, but it does show that Christina really had been interested in the rather elitist and esoteric doctrine of Hermetic Platonic Christianity. In this paper I shall look at her library to show the depth of this Hermetic involvement. Her interest serves as a background to her life as ex-queen in Italy after her famous abdication from the Swedish throne in 1654, when she was 27 years old. Christina styled herself as the Convert of the Age, and she set up court in Rome where she held a series of scientific and cultural acad- emies in her palace. Her Accademia Reale was staged briefly in the Palazzo Farnese in her first year in Rome, 1656, but was revived in 1674 and was held for a number of years in her own Palazzo Riario.1 Also, Giovanni Ciampini’s Accademia dell’Esperienze, also called Ac­­ cademia Fisico-mathematico, gathered there for their first founding meeting in 1677. Furthermore, she was protectress of the Accademia degli Stravaganti in Collegio Clementina from 1678 and in Orvieto for the Accademia dei Misti. (Christina 1966: 377, cited below as NMU.) Her inspirational presence and resources were valued by many liter- ary figures. After her death in 1689, she was chosen to be a symbolic figurehead, Basilissa (Greek for Empress), by the poets that formed the Accademia dell’Arcadia (D’Onofrio 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • The Madrid Protocol: a Slumbering Giant Awakens at Last
    JEROME GILSON ANNE GILSON LALONDE THE MADRID PROTOCOL: A SLUMBERING GIANT AWAKENS AT LAST Matthew Bender® Mealey Publications & Conferences Group The Madrid Protocol: A Slumbering Giant Awakens At Last by JEROME GILSON ANNE GILSON LALONDE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION? For questions about the Editorial Content appearing in this publication or reprint permission, please call: Edward Berger, J.D., at .............................................. 1-800-252-9257 Ext. 2510 Barbara L. Post, J.D. at .............................................. 1-800-252-9257 Ext. 2536 Kenneth Litt, J.D. at ................................................... 1-800-252-9257 Ext. 2046 Nellie Howard, J.D. at................................................ 1-800-252-9257 Ext. 2513 Deneil Targowski at ................................................... 1-800-252-9257 Ext. 2223 Outside the United States and Canada please call...................... (973) 820-2000 For assistance with replacement pages, shipments, billing or other customer service matters, please call: Customer Services Department at............................................. (800) 833-9844 Outside the United States and Canada, please call.................... (518) 487-3000 Fax number................................................................................ (518) 487-3584 For information on other Matthew Bender publications, please call Your account manager or.......................................................... (800) 223-1940 Outside the United States and Canada, please call...................
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Local Review City of Stockholm 2021
    Voluntary Local Review City of Stockholm 2021 start.stockholm Voluntary Local Review City of Stockholm 2021 Dnr: KS 2021/156 | Release date: May 2021 | Publisher: Stadsledningskontoret Contact: Elisabet Bremberg, Helen Slätman | Production: BLOMQUIST.SE Opening Statement Opening Statement The year 2020 and 2021 has forced us to radically change our day-to-day lives and our way of living. Things that we used to take for granted, such as spending time with friends, grandchildren and elderly relatives or travelling have been made impossible by the pandemic. In some parts of the world, people’s ability to spend time outside has been limited in an attempt to stop the spread of the covid-19 virus. The pandemic has left deep scars. Lifes has been lost far too soon and loved ones are mourned. Others have become depressed as a result of social isolation or seen their life’s work destroyed due to a faltering economy. We have all been affected in some way. From a socio-economic perspective, many countries have suffered signifcant economic losses as a result of decreased tourism and lockdowns. The fact that we now have several vaccines that can be used to fght covid-19, and that the process of immunising the population has begun, offers hope for the future. We now have the opportunity to build something new, and cities will play an important role in this respect. Vision 2040 Stockholm – City of Opportunities clearly states that the city aims to be a leader when it comes to implementing the 2030 Agenda. Given the effects of the pandemic, it is more important than ever for major cities to continue to work towards achieving the goals relating to economically, socially and environmentally sustainable development.
    [Show full text]