New Thesis, Final Text
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Paintings in the Year Without a Summer.” Philologia 11, No
Hubbard, Zachary. “Paintings in the Year Without a Summer.” Philologia 11, no. 1 (2019): pp. 17–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/ph.173 RESEARCH Paintings in the Year Without a Summer Zachary Hubbard Virginia Tech, US [email protected] The world of art changed in 1816. Paintings representing the brightest of skies of the European landscape now revealed the dark sun that seemed to take heat away from the world. Artist of this time did not under- stand why, but the atmosphere they were trying to depict was darker than that of the past. The dawns and sunsets that were the main focal points of their art and provided light and hope became redder and darker. A sense of perpetual darkness is shown, even with the light of the sun or the shine of the moon depicted in the skies above. Regardless, artists still looked to the heavens for inspiration, and their depictions have become snapshots of history in this “year without a summer,” showing that life, though hard, continued under a depressing atmosphere. With resilience and hard work, Europeans were able to live through this time, once again seeing the warmth of summer years later. The art created by J.M.W. Turner, John Crome, Caspar David Friedrich, and many other artists showed the changes in the atmosphere but also revealed how the lives of people were forced to continue in the face of darkness. Through their landscape paintings, common themes emerge, such as agriculture, religion, and shipping that will later have significant meaning to the people of these cold times in northern Europe. -
Atmospheric Effects of Volcanic Eruptions As Seen by Famous Artists and Depicted in Their Paintings C
Atmospheric effects of volcanic eruptions as seen by famous artists and depicted in their paintings C. S. Zerefos, V. T. Gerogiannis, D. Balis, S. C. Zerefos, A. Kazantzidis To cite this version: C. S. Zerefos, V. T. Gerogiannis, D. Balis, S. C. Zerefos, A. Kazantzidis. Atmospheric effects of volcanic eruptions as seen by famous artists and depicted in their paintings. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 2007, 7 (2), pp.5145-5172. hal-00302717 HAL Id: hal-00302717 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00302717 Submitted on 16 Apr 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 5145–5172, 2007 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/5145/2007/ Chemistry ACPD © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed and Physics 7, 5145–5172, 2007 under a Creative Commons License. Discussions Past volcanic aerosol optical depths C. S. Zerefos et al. Atmospheric effects of volcanic eruptions as seen by famous artists and depicted in Title Page their paintings Abstract Introduction Conclusions References 1,2 3 4 5 4 C. S. Zerefos , V. T. Gerogiannis , D. Balis , S. -
Caspar David Friedrich and the 20Th Century
Caspar David Friedrich and the 20th Century by Alicia Berdan Art styles in the twentieth century were heavily influenced by the revolutionary changes in art and culture that occurred in the nineteenth century. The first fifty years of the nineteenth century saw the rise and change of how art was expressed to the viewer. During this time period, Germany was home to some of the most essential artists who brought to life emotions, dreams, and nature in their paintings. At the turn of the nineteenth century, German artists reacted against classicism and created a very unique style of German Romanticism that highlighted an important shift in intellectual thinking. In the city of Dresden, located on the eastern border of Germany, one Romantic painter brought to life images of his country and ideas of transcendence that would re- define the ideal message of landscapes. His ideas would resonate through time and inspire artists over a century later. Caspar David Friedrich (1774-1840) developed a unique use of the rückenfigur, a rear-facing figure, in his landscapes to visually enhance the emotional, metaphysical, and the transcendence experience of his works. These developments greatly affected the works of several prominent twentieth century artists, specifically Giorgio de Chirico (1888- 1978) and Mark Rothko (1903-1970), who would both build upon Friedrich’s ideas. The Romantic period of art, which lasted roughly from 1800-1850, was not contained to Germany. Artists from all over Europe are categorized as being Romantic painters today. Romanticism was not a precisely distinct style of art but an extremely complex movement with many different facets. -
Hegel's Criticism of the Painting Style of Caspar David Friedrich
Penultimate full-text author version of an article that was published in the Hegel-Studien 51 (2018), pp. 29-58. Laure Cahen-Maurel (F.R.S.-FNRS / Université Saint-Louis, Brussels) AN ART OF FALSE MYSTERIOUSNESS? Hegel’s Criticism of the Painting Style of Caspar David Friedrich ABSTRACT: Der Aufsatz untersucht Hegels ästhetisches Urteil über den deutschen Maler der Romantik Caspar David Friedrich, das erstmals mit der Veröffentlichung der Ascheberg-Nachschrift von Hegels erster Vorlesung über Ästhetik an der Universität Berlin im Wintersemester 1820/21 zugänglich wurde. Zuerst wird der aktuelle Stand der Forschung zum Verhältnis zwischen Hegel und Caspar David Friedrich kurz betrachtet, wobei auffällt, wie wenig Resonanz Hegels Urteil über Friedrich bislang in der Sekundärliteratur gefunden hat. Über einige eher spekulative Resultate der bisherigen Forschung hinausgehend, wird dann gezeigt, daß man durch die Berücksichtigung bisher übergangener Originalquellen und Dokumente aus den Jahren 1820-1821 präzise bestimmen kann, welche Gemälde Caspar David Friedrichs Hegel bekannt gewesen sein konnten bzw. welche er sogar persönlich angeschaut hat. Hegels in der Ascheberg-Nachschrift überlieferte Kritik wird sodann auf genau diese Gemälde Friedrichs angewendet und schließlich in den größeren Zusammenhang von Hegels Überlegungen zum Stil sowie zum Geheimnis in der Malerei gestellt. Dadurch wird deutlich, daß aus den beiden wichtigsten Vorwürfen des Philosophen an Friedrich, der Strenge und Affektation, eine Reihe von Konsequenzen folgen, die sowohl für die Hegel- als auch für die Caspar David Friedrich-Forschung von Bedeutung sind. I. Introduction: The Ascheberg Transcript of 1820/21 Hegel’s abiding hostility for the writers and philosophers of Early German romanticism is so well known that it barely needs retelling. -
Cambridge Companions Online
Cambridge Companions Online http://universitypublishingonline.org/cambridge/companions/ The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism Edited by Nicholas Saul Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521848916 Online ISBN: 9781139002554 Hardback ISBN: 9780521848916 Paperback ISBN: 9780521613262 Chapter 14 - German Romantic painters pp. 227-242 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521848916.014 Cambridge University Press 14 RICHARD LITTLEJOHNS German Romantic painters A new aesthetic The work of German Romantic artists consistently refl ects, directly or indirectly, the new aesthetic propagated by Romantic writers, critics and theorists. The two most signifi cant painters of the epoch, Caspar David Friedrich and Philipp Otto Runge, were not given to issuing manifestos, preferring to set out their artistic agenda in letters to friends and relatives. Yet their paintings manifest the same tensions between empirical reality and spiritual vision which inform not only the poetic work of Romantic authors but also the theories of art enunciated by Romantics as diverse as Wackenroder and Friedrich Schlegel. Art was no longer conceived as a medium of entertainment, edifi cation or even aesthetic gratifi cation; rather, its function was to body forth insights into the transcendental. It was to be evaluated, not by the criterion of (good) taste, but according to its visionary intensity. In the Herzensergießungen eines kunstliebenden Klosterbruders (1797; Heartfelt Outpourings of an Art-Loving Friar ), which Wackenroder wrote with the assistance of Tieck, art is described as ‘Hieroglypenschrift’ (‘hieroglyphic script’).1 The term was topical, since contemporary schol- ars were on their way to deciphering the Egyptian hieroglyphs. It implied a medium of communication which employed recognisable characters whilst remaining only partially comprehensible and thus offered tantalis- ing but incomplete glimpses into ancient and arcane wisdom.