Microorganisms from Aphid Honeydew Attract and Enhance the Efficacy of Natural Enemies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTICLE Received 30 Nov 2010 | Accepted 11 May 2011 | Published 14 Jun 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1347 Microorganisms from aphid honeydew attract and enhance the efficacy of natural enemies Pascal D. Leroy1, Ahmed Sabri2, Stéphanie Heuskin3, Philippe Thonart2, Georges Lognay3, François J. Verheggen1, Frédéric Francis1, Yves Brostaux4, Gary W. Felton5 & Eric Haubruge1 Aphids are one of the most serious pests of crops worldwide, causing major yield and economic losses. To control aphids, natural enemies could be an option but their efficacy is sometimes limited by their dispersal in natural environment. Here we report the first isolation of a bacterium from the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum honeydew, Staphylococcus sciuri, which acts as a kairomone enhancing the efficiency of aphid natural enemies. Our findings represent the first case of a host-associated bacterium driving prey location and ovipositional preference for the natural enemy. We show that this bacterium has a key role in tritrophic interactions because it is the direct source of volatiles used to locate prey. Some specific semiochemicals produced by S. sciuri were also identified as significant attractants and ovipositional stimulants. The use of this host-associated bacterium could certainly provide a novel approach to control aphids in field and greenhouse systems. 1 Department of Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, University of Liege, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium. 2 Walloon Center of Industrial Biology, University of Liege, B40, 4000 Sart-Tilman, Belgium. 3 Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Liege, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium. 4 Department of Applied Statistics, Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Liege, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Avenue de la Faculté 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium. 5 Department of Entomology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.D.L. (email: [email protected] or [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:348 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1347 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1347 phids are pests that, by their rapid growth and their ability to Here we show that a bacterium from the microflora of the pea spread, constitute major problems for crop production1. The aphid A. pisum honeydew (a hostassociated bacterium) produces Ause of chemical treatments, unfortunately still widespread, semiochemicals that act as effective attractants and ovipositional leads to the selection of resistant individuals whose eradication stimulants for the hoverflyE. balteatus. These findings could lead to becomes increasingly difficult2–5. Natural enemies such as preda the generation of new methods for aphid biological control. tors and parasitoids could be an option6–9, but their efficacy is some times limited by their dispersal in natural environment as they are Results generally highly mobile insects. Identification of the honeydew volatile compounds. Because When feeding on the plant phloem sap, aphid excretes large honeydew was suspected to emit semiochemicals, volatiles from amounts of honeydew, a complex mixture of sugars, organic acids, honeydew samples were collected by solidphase microextraction amino acids and some lipids10–12. The composition of honeydew is (SPME) and analysed by gas chromatographymass spectrometry driven by the host plant that the aphid is feeding on but also by (GC–MS). Fifteen volatiles were identified from crude honeydew the aphid itself, including its primary symbionts. Indeed, sugars and including alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, a pyrazine, a monoterpene amino acids found in the honeydew reflect the phloem sap compo and acids (Table 1). sition12 but additional sugars are also synthesized by the sap feeder10. Essential amino acids are also provided by endosymbiotic bacteria to Origin of the volatile compounds. Because of the possible sources correct the very low and unbalanced concentrations of amino of volatile compounds could be bacterial, a global study of the pea acids in the phloem sap13,14. aphid (A. pisum) honeydew flora was conducted. Two cultivable This excretory product is considered as a food complement bacteria were isolated and identified by 16S ribosomal DNA for many aphid natural enemies15–17 and the volatiles that are sequences as Staphylococcus sciuri (Bacilles: Staphylococcaceae) released are supposed to act as kairomones for parasitoids and and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Pseudomonadales: Moraxellaceae). predators18–24. However, the identification of the semiochemicals The prevalences of the two strains were respectively 3×106 and or volatiles released from natural honeydew has not yet been 9×106 CFU per ml. established25. Because honeydew is mainly composed of sugars Because S. sciuri has been previously found from gut flora of and amino acids, this excretion constitutes an excellent growth some laboratory aphid species and to verify whether this bacte medium for microorganisms that actively contribute to the pro rium as well as A. calcoaceticus are present in the honeydew flora of duction of volatile compounds26. Many investigations using gas wild aphids, the honeydew flora of ten aphid natural species was chromatography and mass spectrometry have illustrated the analysed (Supplementary Table S1). S. sciuri was isolated from ability of bacteria to produce volatile compounds27–29; however, two aphid species: Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas) feeding on their ability to attract insects has been demonstrated in only a Cucurbita pepo L. (1×103 CFU per ml) and Amphorophora idaei very few studies30–33. In biological control, bacterial volatile com (Börner) feeding on Rubus idaeus L. (2×103 CFU per ml). The bacte pounds can serve as signals and act as semiochemicals, attracting rium A. calcoaceticus was identified from one aphid species: Aphis or repelling different insects27. fabae (Scopoli) feeding on Carduus nutans (Nyman) (1×104 CFU Among aphids’ enemies, the hoverfly Episyrphus balteatus per ml). These results indicated that S. sciuri and A. calcoaceticus (De Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae) is recognized as a very efficient occur naturally among natural aphid populations and that these aphidophagous predator. This syrphid is considered as the most bacteria are not contaminants from laboratory handlings. abundant natural enemy in agroecosystems and natural habitats34,35, To determine whether bacteria were responsible for the emis as the most efficient aphid predator36 and is associated with many sion of semiochemicals, SPME and GC–MS analyses were per different aphidplant complexes 37. Furthermore, E. balteatus larvae formed on different honeydew samples. Only a few volatiles were feed on a large variety of aphid species and are voracious feeders, detected when the honeydew was filtered to eliminate the bacteria, often eating hundreds of aphids during their development38. At the or when sterile honeydew was reinoculated with the A. calcoaceticus adult stage, they have an excellent efficiency in locating aphid colo bacterium (Table 1). However, nearly all the volatiles previously nies, using both vision and semiochemicals released from their prey found in crude honeydew were detected in the honeydew reinocu or from infested plants23,38,39. lated with S. sciuri (Table 1). When the 863 medium was inoculated Table 1 | Honeydew volatile compounds. Retention Volatile compounds Crude Sterilized S. sciuri- A. calcoaceticus- 863 liquid S. sciuri- A. calcoaceticus- time honeydew honeydew reinoculated reinoculated medium inoculated 863 inoculated 863 (min) honeydew honeydew liquid medium liquid medium 1.44 Propanone 9.25 ± 2.99 24.62 ± 6.78 10.27 ± 3.20 17.45 ± 5.86 25.63 ± 9.34 15.58 ± 6.46 24.27 ± 10.54 1.76 2,3-Butanedione 2.31 ± 1.26 40.54 ± 13.43 3.56 ± 1.78 15.32 ± 4.63 14.15 ± 5.71 3.14 ± 1.74 31.47 ± 9.55 2.23 3-Methylbutanal 14.01 ± 3.24 5.64 ± 2.65 17.36 ± 6.93 8.98 ± 2.96 2.32 2-Methylbutanal 12.92 ± 1.33 8.79 ± 1.97 9.56 ± 5.61 12.76 ± 4.26 3.24 3-Hydroxy-2-butanone 0.78 ± 0.24 4.77 ± 2.38 3.12 ± 1.29 2.76 ± 1.32 3.19 ± 1.34 6.21 ± 2.45 3.29 3-Methyl-3-buten-1-ol 0.89 ± 0.39 5.64 ± 2.73 1.05 ± 0.64 3.36 3-Methyl-1-butanol 12.32 ± 5.58 4.57 ± 1.03 34.22 ± 13.45 24.75 ± 12.75 15.54 ± 5.47 4.37 2-Methyl-2-buten-1-ol 14.41 ± 1.39 21.61 ± 7.32 4.61 3-Methyl-2-butenal 10.73 ± 2.71 15.82 ± 3.65 14.46 ± 6.34 5.65 Butanoic acid 6.24 ± 3.45 24.43 ± 8.65 5.67 ± 2.76 12.89 ± 4.67 9.22 3-Methylbutanoic acid 4.56 ± 0.45 8.67 ± 3.12 9.53 ± 3.56 9.88 2-Methylbutanoic acid 6.73 ± 5.55 7.31 ± 3.57 9.76 ± 2.87 10.54 2,5-Dimethylpyrazine 0.31 ± 0.16 1.86 ± 0.89 0.70 ± 0.27 3.10 ± 1.14 1.87 ± 0.98 16.04 Limonene 2.81 ± 0.17 33.1 ± 12.87 19.92 Benzeneethanol 1.73 ± 0.50 2.06 ± 1.07 4.45 ± 1.75 0.89 ± 0.13 3.60 ± 1.43 7.88 ± 2.67 Relative proportions (% ± s.e.m., n=5) of the volatile compounds collected by solid-phase microextraction and identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2:348 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1347 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. natUre commUnications | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1347 ARTICLE with the S. sciuri bacterium, the same results were obtained because most of the crude honeydew volatile compounds were detected (Table 1). This strongly indicated that the active honeydew volatiles 6 are mainly produced by S. sciuri. 4 5 1 2 3 Origin of S. sciuri and A.