DOCSLIB.ORG

Wittmann on Davies, 'Rising '44: the Battle for Warsaw'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wittmann on Davies, 'Rising '44: the Battle for Warsaw' H-War Wittmann on Davies, 'Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw' Review published on Saturday, April 1, 2006 Norman Davies. Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw. London: Penguin Books, 2003. $18.00 (paper), ISBN 978-0-14-303540-4; $26.50 (paper), ISBN 978-0-330-48863-1. Reviewed by Anna Wittmann (Department of English, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta) Published on H-War (April, 2006) The Warsaw Rising of 1944: Allied Betrayal or Military Folly? On August 1, 1944, Polish insurgents of the Home Army (Armia Krajowa, AK, commanded by General Tadeusz Bor-Komorowski) seized major German strong points in Warsaw. By the time the last shot of the rising was fired two months later on October 2, some 200,000 lives, including those of about 150,000 civilians, had been lost, and shortly thereafter, approximately 700,000 Poles were expelled from the city and about 55,000 of these were sent to concentration camps.[1] Over 80 percent of Warsaw would be systematically destroyed by occupying Axis troops. Meanwhile, Soviet forces, mainly of the First Byelorussian Front commanded by Marshall Rokossovsky, had looked on from the west banks of the Vistula, a mere 25 to 40 miles south of Warsaw; other columns were some nine miles east of the city. British and American forces had made sporadic attempts to supply the insurgents by air, but, facing occasional bad weather and generally denied landing and refueling privileges--and indeed, sometimes fired upon--by their Soviet "ally," these missions provided little substantial aid. According to Norman Davies, the Warsaw Rising of 1944 represents more than the disastrous attempt of an underground army to drive out the Nazi occupiers who had seized Poland in the fall of 1939. Davies contends that the rising was "a three-sided struggle, in which the centrepiece was provided by the duel of two totalitarian monsters, fascism and communism, and in which the Western democracies frequently featured as a third party of only moderate importance" (p. 619). The Western Allies, he claims, had "no coherent strategy for dealing with Stalin" and were thus greatly responsible for the military disaster (p. 616). Concurrently, the Warsaw Rising, marking as it did a breakdown of the Grand Alliance, represents one of the earliest altercations of the Cold War (p. 620).[2] In Rising '44, Davies writes a polemical analysis of the events leading to the insurgency, the rising itself, and its short- and long-term aftermath. Correspondingly, the book is divided into three parts. Part 1, consisting of a prologue and four parallel chapters, traces Polish relationships with the Western Allies, Germany, and the Soviet Union, beginning well before World War II and continuing to the eve of the rising. He dismisses the Anglo-Polish Treaty of Mutual Assistance of August 25, 1939 as a love affair soon to go sour (p. 27), evidenced by the British claim that "the secret protocol … against an 'attack by a European power' could not be used to refer to the attack by the USSR" (p. 30). The final chapter of part 1 diffusely traces Polish resistance during German occupation, focusing on "Operation Tempest" (Pol. "Burza"), initially planned as a series of consecutive risings to be carried out against retreating Axis troops independently of the Red Army. As it turned out, however, Soviet forces often arrested Home Army fighters (pp. 224, 263). Citation: H-Net Reviews. Wittmann on Davies, 'Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw'. H-War. 03-06-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/13274/wittmann-davies-rising-44-battle-warsaw Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-War In view of this evident Soviet hostility, it is startling to consider that the Polish government-in-exile, headed by Premier Stanislaw Mikolajczyk, approved a rising, waited over a week for news of its launching, and only then took measures to organize full Western support and to resume contact with Moscow, which had been broken off over Katyn more than a year earlier. The government-in-exile also ignored the advice of prominent military personnel, such as Lieutenant-General Kazimierz Sosnkowski, Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Armed Forces, General Wladyslaw Anders, Commander of the Second Polish Corps in Italy, and General Marian Kukiel, Minister of National Defense, who all advised strongly against an insurgency. Davies mentions these details only to brush them aside in the claim that Polish leaders were unaware of true Allied intentions. The five chapters comprising the second part of the book deal with the rising itself and are interspersed with "Snapshots," consisting of firsthand accounts of participants. While these offer vivid glimpses of the insurrection, they are accompanied by little analysis and truncate the core text. What is more, the very "snapshot" nature of Davies's approach precludes any cohesive assessment of urban warfare in Warsaw. In military details, the treatment is limited; readers are forced to look elsewhere for a comprehensive assessment of the fighting capacity of the Home Army or of the approximately 45,000 Reich forces under command of General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski.[3] Davies does not fully consider that Polish strategists grossly underestimated the residual strength of Axis forces stationed in Warsaw and the reinforcements still at their disposal; indeed, the German perspective is one of the most lightly documented in the study, as when he refers to material from the German Federal Archives in Bonn (?)[4] but provides no source for citations from war diaries of the Ninth Army, and often fails to identify individual Axis units. In short, Davies's contention that the Allies sacrificed the Warsaw insurgents is not convincing from a military-strategic perspective, given the context of Polish-Soviet relations and World War II alliances. From the beginning, it is clear that the plan for a "Battle for Warsaw" was ill advised, stemming from wishful thinking on the Polish side that the Soviets would rapidly advance to take Warsaw and that, to supply the insurgents, the Western Allies would divert focus from the Western Front in the wake of D- Day landings in Normandy and the ongoing Battle of the Falaise Pocket from August 19-21. A further question that Davies could have addressed more fully is that of Allied airdrops, about which he provides few details, not even specifying the number of flights. Other sources confirm, nevertheless, that starting on the night of August 4-5, the Royal Air Force made 116 sorties throughout the rising, and the Polish Air Force another 97, with respective losses of just over 16 percent and 15 percent. Once the Soviets finally granted the U.S. Air Force landing permission, a further mission with 107 American Flying Fortresses took place on September 18, but by this time the Germans had regained most of Warsaw. Consequently, fewer than 250 of 1284 containers fell to the Home Army.[5] Still, the question emerges whether, even with ideal flying conditions and without the risk of "friendly fire" from the Soviets, more substantial air supply would have made a positive difference, given the fluctuating fronts of urban warfare--an aspect Davies does not fully address. The third and final part, "After the Rising," expounds on the predictable aftermath of the rising from 1944 to the present. As the Red Army entered Warsaw in January 1945, many insurgents who had escaped arrest by Reich forces found themselves bound for the Soviet Gulag. And, as Davies notes, the Victory Parade in London on June 8, 1946 saw no Polish representation, for the government-in- exile had lost formal recognition shortly after VE-Day. To this day, Davies claims, the rising is largely Citation: H-Net Reviews. Wittmann on Davies, 'Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw'. H-War. 03-06-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/13274/wittmann-davies-rising-44-battle-warsaw Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-War ignored and its leaders vilified, even though, he reiterates, the brunt of blame should fall on the Allied Coalition. Here, the objective analyst must ask whether the Polish military and political leaders who approved the rising, oblivious to political and military realities, were not equally guilty. While Rising '44 is a readable book with an encyclopedic approach, its polemicism makes it of limited value to the historian. Also, Davies's condescending claim that foreign readers are unable to deal with Polish names leads him to refer to prominent figures only by position titles (e.g., Minister of Defense) or pseudonyms, as when Premier Mikolajczyk becomes "Premier Mick" or General Bor-Komorowski becomes "General Boor." The tactic sends the reader scrambling to a fourteen-page list of modified names that are not alphabetically cross-referenced. In addition, a bibliography of archival, primary, and secondary sources would have been a substantial aid to researchers. Thus, a number of methodological and documentary limitations tailor Davies's otherwise substantial study more to a popular readership than a scholarly one, even though his contentions may well serve as springboards for academic debate. Notes [1]. Sources diverge in estimates of losses. Among others, see Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, "The Warsaw Rising 1944: Perception and Reality,"http://www.warsawuprising.com/paper/chodakiewicz1.htm (January 10, 2006); Tadeusz Kondracki, "The Warsaw Rising,"http://www.polishresistance-ak.org/4 Article.htm (January 10, 2006); Joanna Hanson, The Civilian Population and the Warsaw Uprising of 1944 (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982); Jozef Garlinski, Poland in the Second World War (London: Macmillan, 1985). [2]. This contention is, of course, not new. See Hanns von Krannhals, Der Warschauer Aufstand 1944 (Frankfurt: Bernard & Graefe, 1962); Richard Lukas, "The Big Three and the Warsaw Uprising," Military Affairs 39, no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stonehill College Europe Challenged
    Stonehill College April 14, 2016 Europe Challenged J. Brian Atwood It is a real pleasure to visit Stonehill. I thank Professor Anna Ohanyan for inviting me here today. Professor Ohanyan has done impressive scholarly work in her field. We met at the Watson Institute at Brown a few months ago participating in a symposium on the Dayton agreement on Bosnia. I want to talk to you today about the European Project—the 50­year effort to build an integrated, secure, democratic and prosperous Europe. Even casual observers would conclude that it is not going well today. Europe is under attack from within and without. This sad state of affairs should be of great concern to the United States; yet it appears that we are at risk of writing an American version of John F. Kennedy’s 1940 book “While England Slept.” Our approach to Europe today seriously underestimates the nature of the crisis. We hear a great deal about the terrorist attacks and the refugee and migrant crisis. However, this is the tip of a very dangerous iceberg. There is no denying the stresses these issues are creating, but there are also underlying threats that receive far less attention. Our presidential candidates tend to ignore these threats. Or worse in the case of Donald Trump who has questioned our 1 commitment to NATO at a time when the deterrent value of this alliance is arguably more important than ever. Even President Obama in his now well­read Atlantic magazine interview complains that European leaders need to do more while he states his own preference to look towards Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental Seminars - Spring Term 2007/08
    Departmental Seminars - Spring term 2007/08 The department puts on two separate seminar programmes: the Departmental Seminars (DS) and the Research Seminars (RS). The Departmental Seminars are joint seminars, organized by 2 or more professors (convenors), and are essentially teaching seminars, aimed at examining broad developments within the discipline, and exploring major theoretical and methodological issues. Each semester the department will put on 5 to 6 Departmental Seminars (8 to 9 sessions per semester). Alongside the Departmental Seminars are the Research Seminars (8 to 9 sessions per semester) which are organized by individual professors (or in some cases jointly organized by 2 professors). The Research Seminars are intended as specialized seminars dealing with the research in progress of professors, researchers and visiting scholars. Researchers normally attend the Research Seminars of their supervisors. First year researchers are required to take 3 seminars in the autumn semester (RS or DS) and two seminars in the spring semester (RS or DS). Of these five seminars the researcher has to choose two DS. A researcher is not confined to the Departmental Seminars offered by the Department of History, but may, where appropriate and with the approval of her/his supervisor, take a seminar offered by another department. The Department formally requires you to register with Mr. Sergio Amadei the titles of the seminars, which you must attend during each of your first and second semesters of study. During the autumn semester all first year researchers will be required to hand in a written presentation and to give an oral presentation upon the subject of 2 of the seminars that they are attending.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodation, Collaboration, and Resistance in Poland, 1939- 1947: a Theory of Choices and the Methodology of a Case Study 1
    1 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz Accommodation, Collaboration, And Resistance in Poland, 1939- 1947: A Theory of Choices and the Methodology of a Case Study 1 A human being virtually always has a choice of how to conduct himself. Depending on the circumstances and conditions, a man can choose to behave actively or passively, atrociously or decently, and, exceptionally, even heroically. Moreover, one can display in succession any or all of the aforementioned characteristics. The innate attributes and handicaps of an individual inform the choices but do not guarantee the outcomes. That means that, at a certain point, a decent human being can behave atrociously, and vice versa. This concerns in particular human behavior in the extremity of terror. However, rather than suggesting that human behavior is arbitrary and unpredictable, I would like to propose that human behavior is a result of choices. How I arrived at these conclusions is the topic of the present discussion. I shall discuss first the methodology of my inquiry and then I shall elaborate on my discoveries. The Scientific Laboratory Scientific experiments are usually performed in a laboratory. As any biologist, chemist, or physicist can attest, sometimes the practical application of various scientific theories in the laboratory renders them null and void. At other times, however, scientific discoveries achieved in the controlled environment of the laboratory prove problematic at best and worthless at the extreme, if applied in the outside world. 1 I would like to dedicate my lecture to the memory of Professor Stanisław Blejwas, a teacher and a friend. 2 Throughout the ages the world has served as a giant laboratory for social scientists, historians in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Name “Polish Death Camps” a Misnomer?
    Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal 95 Is the Name “Polish Death Camps” a Misnomer? Jacek Gancarson / e-mail: [email protected] The Home Army Cichociemni Paratroopers Foundation, Warsaw, Poland Natalia Zaitceva / e-mail: [email protected] The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia Gancarsom, J. – Zaitceva, N. (2019). Is the Name “Polish Death Camps” a Misnomer? Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal, 11/2, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.5817/cphpj-2019-022 The purpose of the study is a historical-linguistic analysis of the ambiguous name “Polish death camps” (or “Polish concentration camps”), which for the last thirty years has led to conflicting assessments among politicians, journalists and historians, and in some cases being considered as a term. In order to make an accurate assessment of this name, and to clarify the question of the correctness/incorrectness of its use and come to a conclusion about the linguistic suitability/unsuitability to consider it a term, the authors study the new evidence by historians, interviews with public and political figures, and in particular, for the first time investigate the original editorial material where the name was formulated. In the course of the study, the true source of the name “Polish death camps” was first disclosed and a comprehensive history of its use was presented. Basing on gathered material the conclusion was made that the name is linguistically incorrect and can not be used as a term. Key words: Polish death camps; language
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks to William Szych for Starting This Reading List. Most of the Books Below Can Be Found on Amazon Or Other Sites Where
    Thanks to William Szych for starting this reading list. Most of the books below can be found on Amazon or other sites where you can read reviews of the books (Google Search). Remember you can usually request your local library to get books for you through regional book-lending agreements. If you know of other books that you think should be added, let us know. This list includes some works of historical fiction. 1. 22 Britannia Road, a novel by Amanda Hodgkinson 2. 303 Squadron: The Legendary Battle of Britain Fighter Squadron 3. A Death in the Forest (Poland’s Daughter: A Story of Love, War, and Exile) by Daniel Ford 4. A Long Long Time Ago and Essentially True, by Brigid Pasulka 5. A Memoir of the Warsaw Uprising, by Miron Bialoszewski 6. A Question of Honor: The Kosciuszko Squadron: Forgotten Heroes of World War II. Lynne Olson and Stanley Cloud 7. A Secret Life: The Polish Officer, His Covert Mission, and the Price He Paid to Save His Country, by Benjamin Weiser 8. A World Apart: Imprisonment in a Soviet Labor Camp During World War II 9. An Army in Exile—the Story of the Second Polish Corps, by Lt. General W. Anders 10. Andrew Bienkowski: One life to Give: A Path to Finding Yourself by Helping Others 11. Andrzej Pityński Sculpture. Anna Chudzik (Editor), Andrzej K. Olszewski, Irena Grzesiuk-Olszewska (Introduction) 12. As Far As My Feet Will Carry Me by Josef Bauer 13. Bieganski: The Brute Polak Stereotype in Polish-Jewish Relations and American Popular Culture by Danusha Goska 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Even Past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST
    "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST Search the site ... The Isles: A History, by Like 20 Norman Davies (1999) Tweet By Mark Sheaves On September 18 the Scottish people will vote to decide whether the country should withdraw from the United Kingdom. Over the summer the polls have swung back and forth, and as the referendum draws closer the competing campaigns have intensied. Nationalist rhetoric prevails on both sides, with historical examples deployed to either highlight injustices or moments of peaceful prosperous union. Indeed, the historical animosity felt by many Scots towards the ruling Conservative party seems to be worrying the Prime Minister, David Cameron. Demonstrating his lack of faith in the Scottish people’s decision-making faculties he urged voters last week not to break up the union just to give the “eng Tories a kick”. The history of the relationship between the two kingdoms is vital for both camps, but surely it is more complicated than historical subjection or fraternal cooperation. Exploring the millennium long relationship between England and Scotland – as George Christian also did in his NEP article last Monday – we can begin to comprehend the complicated issues at stake in this referendum and the possible ramications. Few have tackled such a large topic, but one book that has is Norman Davies’ The Isles: A History. Published in 1999, The Isles, traces the development of the political entities and cultural identities inhabiting the archipelagos currently divided into the nations of England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851
    Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 Rosemary Hill Queen Mary, University of London Submitted for the degree of PhD March 2011 1 I confirm that the work presented in this thesis and submitted for the degree of PhD is my own. Rosemary Hill 2 Abstract The thesis concentrates on the work of fourteen antiquaries active in the period from the French Revolution to the Great Exhibition in England, Scotland and France. I have used a combination of the antiquaries’ published works, which cover, among other subjects, architecture, topography, costume history, Shakespeare and the history of furniture, alongside their private papers to develop an account of that lived engagement with the past which characterised the romantic period. It ends with the growing professionalistion and specialisation of historical studies in the mid-nineteenth century which left little room for the self-generating, essentially romantic antiquarian enterprise. In so far as this subject has been considered at all it has been in the context of what has come to be called ‘the invention of tradition’. It is true that the romantic engagement with history as narrative led to some elaboration of the facts, while the newness of the enterprise laid it open to mistakes. I have not ignored this. The restoration of the Bayeux Tapestry, the forged tartans of the Sobieski Stuarts and the creation of Shakespeare’s Birthplace are all considered. Overall, however, I have been concerned not to debunk but as it were to ‘rebunk’, to see the antiquaries in their historical context and, as far as possible, in their own terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Robbins on Davies, 'The Isles: a History'
    H-Albion Robbins on Davies, 'The Isles: A History' Review published on Monday, May 1, 2000 Norman Davies. The Isles: A History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. xliii + 1222 pp. $45.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-19-513442-1. Reviewed by Keith Robbins (Vice-Chancellor, University of Wales, Lampeter, Wales, U.K) Published on H-Albion (May, 2000) Capturing Insular Space Fresh from coping with a continent in his magisterial study of Europe, Norman Davies now tackles an equally daunting task -- a comprehensive history of his own country. He is only too aware of the risks entailed in such an undertaking particularly since he freely admits that while himself a British citizen and a professional historian he has no claim to special expertise in the British historical field. His reputation, of course, was initially made as an authority on the history of Poland. Moreover, although it appears that he has put chapters in front of specialists in particular periods of British history to gain their advice he has not been content to summarize what might be taken to be the reigning consensus. His intention, rather, has been to escape from what he calls "the professional game" and engage directly and personally with "the established record of the past." The result is a challenging, stimulating and sometimes irritating volume, and one suspects that Davies would himself have been irritated if he had been thought to have produced a bland and comfortable book in which his readers would have been at ease. The books takes further that scrutiny of the nature of "Britain" and "Britishness" which has been going on for several decades now that the old Anglocentric straitjacket is, as Davies puts it, bursting at the seams.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip to Siberia
    Glaukopis, no. 4 (2006): 74-96. The Fate of the Siberian Exiles: On the methodology of studying ethnic cleansing in the Soviet-occupied Polish lands 1 In September 1939 Hitler and Stalin jointly invaded Poland. Having conquered the state, both dictators applied terror toward its citizens. The Nazis and the Communists aimed “to completely suppress the political and sociocultural life of the Polish people forever,” according to Tadeusz Piotrowski (p. 1).2 Members of the elite, Christians in particular, were exterminated (e.g., in Katyn3 and Palmiry). The population experienced a variety of repressive measures, including deportations. Tadeusz Piotrowski selected about a score of recollections by Polish Christians to illustrate Stalin’s “ethnic cleansing” campaign in the Eastern Borderlands between 1939 and 1941.4 Unlike the contemporary Polish accounts available at the Hoover Institution,5 most of these depositions were written well after the Second World War. Therefore they reveal not only the ghastly Gulag experience of the Polish deportees but also their post-Soviet travails. Many of the authors were children during their ghastly exile to the Soviet Union, which gives their recollections a special twist. Many of them refer to their experience as “the Siberian Gehenna.” Members of the broadly understood elite were targeted first, for example Mr. Borkowski who had been “chairman of a rural co-operative and commandant of an army [mounted] reserve called Krakus” near Rożyszcze (p. 20). Community leaders of all levels and kinds as well as their families were earmarked for arrest and deportation. In some instances the arrest of the victims was carried out in a calm and orderly manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates on the Holocaust and the Legacy of Anti-Semitism in Poland
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 The Memory Wars: Debates on the Holocaust and the Legacy of anti-Semitism in Poland Jonathan Andrew Bergquist Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Bergquist, Jonathan Andrew, "The Memory Wars: Debates on the Holocaust and the Legacy of anti- Semitism in Poland" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 5188. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5188 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Memory Wars: Debates on the Holocaust and the Legacy of anti-Semitism in Poland Jonathan Andrew Bergquist Thesis submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Robert Blobaum, Ph.D., Chair Joshua Arthurs, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Polish-Jewish Relations; the Holocaust; Collective Memory; anti-Semitism Copyright 2015 Jonathan Andrew Bergquist ABSTRACT The Memory Wars: Debates on the Holocaust and the Legacy of anti-Semitism in Poland Jonathan Andrew Bergquist The process of Vergangenheitsbewältigung, or mastering the past, is often slow and painful.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermarium: the Land Between the Black and Baltic Seas by Marek Jan Chodakiewicz (New Brunswick: Transaction, 2012), 568 Pages
    Intermarium: The Land between the Black and Baltic Seas by Marek Jan Chodakiewicz (New Brunswick: Transaction, 2012), 568 pages Reviewed by Dovid Katz Cultural historian, DefendingHistory.com, Vilnius In this bold combination of succinct history, a sweeping—though tendentious— contemporary survey, and a dubious geostrategic blueprint intended mainly for Washington foreign-policy eyes, Marek Jan Chodakiewicz presents Eastern Europe (to which some, as matter of principle, refer as “East Central Europe”) as a major new United States ally on the European map. Positioned geographically between the Baltic and Black Seas, the author dubs this part of the world “Intermarium,” though it seems doubtful that his name for it will ever really catch on. He also draws attention to the fact that it is positioned between mighty and often rapacious powers, namely, Germany and Russia. Certainly the idea of a new federation that would “save” Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine from a Russian monster by putting them in a new grouping together with the former Soviet republics and satellites already firmly embedded in the EU and NATO, and a plan for this group to become a specifically American ally, sounds somewhat far-fetched. Still, the format of past–present–future shoehorned into twenty-six usually brief chapters (with many pages of notes immediately following) succeeds in making this book attractively dual-purposed, for the interested general reader and the scholar alike. But shockingly—uncannily, as if preordained by a Higher Authority—the author has undermined his own opus with a lengthy final chapter, in effect on the Holocaust, that is of an altogether different ilk and caliber than the rest of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Lands and Eastern Europe
    THE GERMAN LANDS AND EASTERN EUROPE STUDIES IN RUSSIA AND EAST EUROPE This series includes books on general, political, historical, economic and cultural themes relating to Russia and East Europe written or edited by members of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies in the University of London, or by authors working in association with the School. Recent titles include: Roger Bartlett and Karen Schon walder (editors) THE GERMAN LANDS AND EASTERN EUROPE Essays on the History of their Social, Cultural and Political Relations John Channon (editor) POLmCS, SOCIETY AND STALINISM IN THE USSR Geoffrey Hosking and Robert Service (editors) RUSSIAN NATIONALISM, PAST AND PRESENT Krystyna Iglicka and Keith Sword (editors) THE CHALLENGE OF EAST-WEST MIGRATION FOR POLAND Marja Nissinen LATVIA'S TRANSITION TO A MARKET ECONOMY Political Determinants of Economic Reform Policy Jeremy Smith THE BOLSHEVIKS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION, 1917-23 Jeanne Sutherland SCHOOLING IN THE NEW RUSSIA Innovation and Change, 1984-95 Keith Sword DEPORTATION AND EXILE Poles in the Soviet Union, 1939-48 Studies in Russia and East Europe Series Standing Order ISBN 978-0-333-71018-0 (outside North America onLy) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of difficulty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and the ISBN quoted above. Customer Services Department, Macmillan Distribution Ltd Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG2l
    [Show full text]