DOCSLIB.ORG

Delayed Complications and Functional Outcome of Isolated Sternal Fracture After Emergency Department Discharge: a Prospective, Multicentre Cohort Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delayed Complications and Functional Outcome of Isolated Sternal Fracture After Emergency Department Discharge: a Prospective, Multicentre Cohort Study ORIGINAL RESEARCH RECHERCHE ORIGINALE Delayed complications and functional outcome of isolated sternal fracture after emergency department discharge: a prospective, multicentre cohort study Samuel Racine, MD*†**; Marcel Émond, MD, MSc*†**; Jean-Sébastien Audette-Côté, MD¶; Natalie Le Sage, MD, PhD*†**; Chantal Guimont, MD, PhD†**; Lynne Moore, PhD***; Jean-Marc Chauny, MD, MSc‡; Éric Bergeron, MD, MSc*§; Laurent Vanier, MD, PhD§ ABSTRACT cliniques fonctionnels chez des patients ayant subi une fracture isolée du sternum, et ce après le congé du Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the département d’urgence (DU), comparativement à des patients incidence of delayed complications, specifically hemothorax, ayant subi d’autres traumas thoraciques mineurs. and functional outcome in patients with isolated sternal Méthode: Il s’agit d’une étude prospective de cohorte qui a fracture discharged from the emergency department (ED) été menée dans quatre DU rattachés à des centres hospita- compared to patients with other minor thoracic trauma. liers universitaires au Canada. Des patients âgés de 16 ans et Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in plus ayant obtenu leur congé du DU après avoir subi un four university-affiliated Canadian EDs. Patients ages 16 and traumatisme thoracique mineur isolé ont participé à cette older discharged from the ED with an isolated minor thoracic étude; leur état a été catégorisé comme suit : fracture isolée du injury were included and categorized as isolated sternal sternum, fracture(s) de côte(s) ou aucune fracture. Un suivi fracture, rib fracture, or no fracture. A standardized clinical clinique et radiologique standardisé a été effectué au 7e et 14e and radiological follow-up was performed at 7 and 14 days as jour, ainsi qu’un suivi téléphonique au 30e et 90e jour après well as a phone follow-up at 30 and 90 days post-injury. l’accident. Les résultats cliniques fonctionnels ont été évalués Functional outcome was determined using the Medical selon le questionnaire Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Outcome Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Survey (SF-12). Results: A total of 969 patients were included, of whom 32 Résultats: Au total, 969 patients ont participé à l’étude, dont (3.3%) had an isolated sternal fracture, 304 (31.3%) had rib 32 (3,3%) souffraient d’une fracture isolée du sternum; 304 fracture, and 633 (65.3%) had no fracture. Within 14 days, (31,3%), d’une fracture(s) de côte(s) et 633 (65,3%), d’aucune 112 patients presented with a delayed hemothorax: 12.5% of fracture. Au cours des 14 jours suivants, 112 patients ont sternal fracture patients, 23% of rib fracture(s) patients, and consulté pour un hémothorax retardé : 12,5% à la suite d’une 6% of minor thoracic injury patients without fracture fracture du sternum; 23% à la suite d’une fracture(s) de côte(s) (p < 0.05). At 90 days, 57.1% of patients with sternal fracture et 6% à la suite de traumatisme thoracique mineur sans had moderate to severe disability compared to 25.4% and fracture (p < 0,05). Au bout de 90 jours, 57,1% des patients 21.2% for both of the other groups, respectively (p < 0.001). ayant subi une fracture du sternum présentaient une incapa- Conclusion: In this prospective study, we found that 12.5% cité modérée ou grave par rapport à 25,4% et 21,2% dans les (n = 4, p < 0.05) of patients with sternal fracture developed a deux autres groupes, respectivement (p < 0,001). delayed hemothorax, but the clinical significance of this remains Conclusions: Les résultats de cette étude prospective questionable. The proportion of patients with sternal fracture démontrent qu’un hémothorax retardé s’est formé chez who had moderate to severe disability was significantly higher 12,5% (n = 4; p < 0,05) des patients ayant subi une fracture than that of patients with other minor thoracic trauma. du sternum, mais la portée clinique de cette complication RÉSUMÉ reste discutable. Une incapacité modérée ou grave a été observée dans une proportion significativement plus grande Objectif: L’étude visait à déterminer l’incidence de complica- de patients ayant subi une fracture du sternum que de tions tardives, précisément de l’hémothorax, et de résultats patients ayant subi d’autres traumas thoraciques mineurs. From the *Axe santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus, Québec, QC; †Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d’urgence, Université Laval, Québec, QC; ‡Centre hospitalier du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, QC; §Centre hospitalier de Charles-LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Longueuil, QC; ¶Centre hospitalier régional de Lanaudière, Joliette, QC; and; and **CHU de Québec, Québec, QC. Correspondence to: Dr. Marcel Émond, Emergency Department, CHU de Québec, Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus, 1401, 18e Rue, Room H-607, Québec, QC G1J 1Z4; Email: [email protected]. © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians CJEM 2016;18(5):349-357 DOI 10.1017/cem.2016.326 CJEM JCMU 2016;18(5) 349 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 01 Oct 2021 at 04:08:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2016.326 Racine et al Keywords: isolated sternal fracture, minor thoracic trauma, METHODS delayed complications, funtionnal outcome, delayed hemothorax Study setting and population This prospective observational cohort study was INTRODUCTION conducted in four Canadian university-affiliated EDs (Hôpitaux l’Enfant-Jésus and CHUL of the CHU de fi Sternal fracture is usually the result of signi cant blunt Québec, Centre Hospitalier du Sacré-Cœur de thoracic trauma and occurs more frequently in drivers Montréal, Centre hospitalier Charles-Lemoyne), wearing three-point restraint who are involved in a motor between March 25, 2006 and November 2, 2010 and 1 vehicle crash. Its reported incidence varies between was a preplanned subanalysis of a larger project with 2 0.33% of trauma patients and 3.7% of patients admitted prior publications involving the follow-up of patients 3 after a motor vehicle crash and increases with age. It can with minor thoracic injury.13,14,17 Patients ages 16 years be present in up to 27.7% of thoracic injuries associated and over who presented to the ED with a minor thor- with motor vehicle crashes in the extreme elderly popu- acic injury were screened for eligibility. Minor thoracic > 4 lation ( 80 years of age). Sternal fractures are often injury was defined by the presence of chest abrasion or associated with other injuries, most commonly soft tissue contusion, or suspected or radiographically confirmed 2 contusions (56%) and rib fractures (49.6%). When rib fracture. All participants were discharged from the isolated, they are associated with a reported mortality rate ED after receiving care by the attending physician of between 0.7% and 3.5%. Poor outcomes are associated (primary care physician, emergency physician, or other with the severity of other injuries, complications, and specialist). Patients were excluded if 1) they had a 3,5 pre-existing comorbidity. hemothorax, pneumothorax, lung contusion, or any fi Knowledge regarding the clinical signi cance of significant cerebral, thoracic, abdominal, or extremity isolated sternal fracture has evolved, and many studies injury diagnosed on their initial ED visit; or 2) a follow- have demonstrated that patients with this injury can up was not possible due to geographic or social safely be discharged from the emergency department circumstances; or 3) there was a delay greater than 6-9 (ED) after investigation. A retrospective cohort study 3 days between the injury and the ED visit (a cut-off found that cardiac complications were present in 0.8% of based on a previous publication showed that 90% of 5 fi isolated sternal fracture cases. Clinically signi cant patients seeking medical attention in an acute care cardiac complications associated with isolated sternal setting do so within 72 hours of injury).18 The study fracture have been shown to be essentially nonexistent was approved by the Research Ethics Board of all four when an initial electrocardiogram and cardiac biomarker involved institutions, and written consent was obtained 7 levels are normal. Current literature suggests that rou- from study participants. tine admission is no longer required for isolated sternal 9,10 11 fracture ; however, this practice remains widespread. Study protocol Delayed hemothorax has been reported as an important complication with patients with minor thoracic injuries Initial ED care, evaluation, and data collection were left discharged from the ED, with an incidence of 7.4% of to the discretion of the attending physicians, who were 12 blunt thoracic injuries reported in Europe and 11.8% in blinded to the research protocol and study outcomes. 13 North America. However, the only published prospective Participants thus received usual care and standard studies addressing delayed complications of minor thoracic discharge instructions. Participants then returned for fi injuries did not speci cally assess isolated sternal frac- standardized medical outpatient evaluations at 7 and 12-14 tures. Moreover, very few authors have studied func- 14 days post-injury. Assessment at these visits included tional outcome or pain experienced by patients with minor pain severity, clinical examination, and an upright chest 14-17 thoracic injuries or sternal fracture after ED discharge. X-ray. There was no specific protocol regarding pain The purpose of this study was to determine and regimen, and this, too, was left to the discretion of compare complications and outcomes of patients with the physician involved. Information on potentially sig- isolated sternal fracture discharged from the ED to nificant delayed complications, including hemothorax, those with other minor thoracic injury. pneumothorax, atelectasis, and lung contusion, were 350 2016;18(5) CJEM JCMU Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Practice Management Guidelines for Screening of Blunt Cardiac Injury
    PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR SCREENING OF BLUNT CARDIAC INJURY EAST Practice Parameter Workgroup for Screening of Blunt Cardiac Injury Michael D. Pasquale, MD Kimberly Nagy, MD John Clarke, MD © Copyright 1998 Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma 1 Practice Management Guidelines for Screening of Blunt Cardiac Injury I. Statement of the problem The reported incidence of blunt cardiac injury (BCI), formerly called myocardial contusion, depends on the modality and criteria used for diagnosis and ranges from 8% to 71% in those patients sustaining blunt chest trauma. The true incidence remains unknown as there is no diagnostic gold standard, i.e. the available data is conflicting with respect to how the diagnosis should be made (EKG, enzyme analysis, echocardiogram, etc.) The lack of such a standard leads to confusion with respect to making a diagnosis and makes the literature difficult to interpret. Key issues involve identifying a patient population at risk for adverse events from BCI and then appropriately monitoring and treating them. Conversely, patients not at risk could potentially be discharged from the hospital with appropriate follow-up. II. Process A Medline search from January 1986 through February 1997 was performed. All English language citations during this time period with the subject words “myocardial contusion”, “blunt cardiac injury”, and “cardiac trauma” were retrieved. Letters to the editor, isolated case reports, series of patients presenting in cardiac arrest, and articles focusing on emergency room thoracotomy were deleted from the review. This left 56 articles which were primarily well-conducted studies or reviews involving the identification of BCI. III. Recommendations A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sternal Insufficiency Fracture Related to Steroid-Induced Osteoporosis: a Case Report Jessica J
    0008-3194/2013/48–54/$2.00/©JCCA 2013 Sternal insufficiency fracture related to steroid-induced osteoporosis: A case report Jessica J. Wong, BSc, DC, FCCS(C)1 Brian Drew, MD, FRCPS2 Paula Stern, BSc, DC, FCCS(C)1 Osteoporosis often results in fractures, deformity L’ostéoporose cause souvent des fractures, des and disability. A rare but potentially challenging difformités et l’invalidité. Une complication rare, mais complication of osteoporosis is a sternal insufficiency potentiellement grave, de l’ostéoporose est la fracture fracture. This case report details a steroid-induced par insuffisance osseuse du sternum. Ce rapport osteoporotic male who suffered a sternal insufficiency décrit en détail le cas d’un mâle atteint d’ostéoporose fracture after minimal trauma. Prompt diagnosis causée par les stéroïdes et qui a subi une fracture par and appropriate management resulted in favourable insuffisance osseuse du sternum après un traumatisme outcome for the fracture, though a sequalae involving a minime. Grâce à un diagnostic rapide et une gestion myocardial infarction ensued with his osteoporosis and appropriée, on a obtenu de bons résultats pour la complex health history. The purpose of this case report fracture, mais des séquelles ont été laissées sous forme is to heighten awareness around distinct characteristics d’un infarctus du myocarde en raison de ses antécédents of sternal fractures in osteoporotic patients. Discussion médicaux complexes. Le but de cette étude de cas est focuses on the incidence, mechanism, associated de sensibiliser sur les caractéristiques distinctes des factors and diagnostic challenge of sternal insufficiency fractures du sternum chez les patients ostéoporotiques. fractures. This case report highlights the role primary La discussion porte sur l’incidence, le mécanisme, contact practitioners can play in recognition and les facteurs associés et la difficulté de diagnostic des management of sternal insufficiency fractures related to fractures par insuffisance osseuse du sternum.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Blunt Chest Trauma-Suspected Cardiac Injury
    Revised 2020 American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Blunt Chest Trauma-Suspected Cardiac Injury Variant 1: Suspected cardiac injury following blunt trauma, hemodynamically stable patient. Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level US echocardiography transthoracic resting Usually Appropriate O Radiography chest Usually Appropriate ☢ CT chest with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT chest without and with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ CTA chest with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ CTA chest without and with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢ US echocardiography transesophageal May Be Appropriate O CT chest without IV contrast May Be Appropriate ☢☢☢ CT heart function and morphology with May Be Appropriate IV contrast ☢☢☢☢ US echocardiography transthoracic stress Usually Not Appropriate O MRI heart function and morphology without Usually Not Appropriate and with IV contrast O MRI heart function and morphology without Usually Not Appropriate IV contrast O MRI heart with function and inotropic stress Usually Not Appropriate without and with IV contrast O MRI heart with function and inotropic stress Usually Not Appropriate without IV contrast O MRI heart with function and vasodilator stress Usually Not Appropriate perfusion without and with IV contrast O CTA coronary arteries with IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ SPECT/CT MPI rest only Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢ FDG-PET/CT heart Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢☢ SPECT/CT MPI rest and stress Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢☢ ACR Appropriateness
    [Show full text]
  • Nuss Procedure for Surgical Stabilization of Flail Chest with Horizontal Sternal Body Fracture and Multiple Bilateral Rib Fractures
    Case Report Nuss procedure for surgical stabilization of flail chest with horizontal sternal body fracture and multiple bilateral rib fractures Sung Kwang Lee, Do Kyun Kang Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, South Korea Correspondence to: Do Kyun Kang, MD. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 875 (Jwadong) Haeundae-ro, Haeundaegu, Busan 612-030, South Korea. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Flail chest is a life-threatening situation that paradoxical movement of the thoracic cage was caused by multiply fractured ribs in two different planes, or a sternal fracture, or a combination of the two. The methods to achieve stability of the chest wall are controversy between surgical fixation and mechanical ventilation. We report a case of a 33-year-old man who fell from a high place with fail chest due to multiple rib fractures bilaterally and horizontal sternal fracture. The conventional surgical stabilization using metal plates by access to the front of the sternum could not provide stability of the flail segment because the fracture surface was obliquely upward and there were multiple bilateral rib fractures adjacent the sternum. The Nuss procedure was performed for supporting the flail segment from the back. Flail chest was resolved immediately after the surgery. The patient was weaned from the mechanical ventilation on third postoperative day successfully and was ultimately discharged without any complications. Keywords: Nuss procedure; sternum fracture; rib fractures; flail chest Submitted Feb 13, 2016. Accepted for publication Mar 10, 2016. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.05 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.04.05 Introduction the sternal body and bilaterally fractured ribs adjacent to the sternum (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • High Yield Topics of the ABSITE: Trauma/Critical Care
    High Yield Topics of the ABSITE: Trauma/Critical Care Jacob D. Edwards, MD PGY5-General Surgery Resident East Carolina University Vidant Medical Center Outline • Trauma • Critical Care • Head • Ventilator management • Neck • ARDS • Chest • Hemodynamic monitoring and • Abdominal parameters • Retroperitoneal • Shock • Pelvic • Cardiovascular Pharmacology • Extremity • Nutrition • Pregnacy • AKI/ARF • Indications for hemodialysis Trauma Feature Response Score Head Trauma Motor Follows Commands 6 Localizes to pain 5 Withdraws to pain 4 • GCS calculation Flexion w/ pain (decort) 3 • Indications for Head CT Extension w/ Pain (decer) 2 • Penetrating trauma No response 1 • CSF from Nose or Ears Verbal Oriented 5 • Hemotympanum Confused 4 • EtOH/Drugs Inappropriate words 3 Incomprehensible sounds 2 • AMS or depressed GCS No response 1 • Focal Neurologic signs Eye Spontaneous 4 opening Open to command 3 Open to pain 2 No response 1 Head Trauma • Epidural hematomaMiddle meningeal artery • LOClucid perioddeterioration • Operate for MLS>5mm • Subdural Hematomabridging veins/venous plexus • Operate for MLS >1cm • Intraventricular hemorrhage • Cause Hydrcephalusventriculostomy • DAI • MRI>CT • If elevated ICPcraniectomy Photo credit: Medscape.com Head Trauma • ICP Monitors • Brain trauma foundation • GCS <9 w/ abnormal CT • Normal CT w/ GCS <9 and >40 yo or posturing or hypotensive • Peak ICP 48-72hrs after injury • CPP = MAP – ICP • ICP management >20mmHg (newer guidelines >22mmHg) • Goal to obtained CPP >60 • Raise HOB • Relative Hyperventilation •
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Causation Sternal Fractures
    Ministry of Defence Synopsis of Causation Sternal Fractures Authors: Mr M Jeyam, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham and Professor W Angus Wallace, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham Validator: Mr Sheo Tibrewal, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London September 2008 Disclaimer This synopsis has been completed by medical practitioners. It is based on a literature search at the standard of a textbook of medicine and generalist review articles. It is not intended to be a meta-analysis of the literature on the condition specified. Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in the synopsis is accurate and consistent with current knowledge and practice and to do this the synopsis has been subject to an external validation process by consultants in a relevant specialty nominated by the Royal Society of Medicine. The Ministry of Defence accepts full responsibility for the contents of this synopsis, and for any claims for loss, damage or injury arising from the use of this synopsis by the Ministry of Defence. 2 1. Definition 1.1. Sternal fracture involves disruption to the cortex of the sternum due to a direct blow or a pathological process. It occurs in isolation or with other associated injuries. 3 2. Clinical Features 2.1. Sternal fractures are diagnosed in 3.7% of victims of road traffic accidents who attend hospital.1 Whilst these are among the less common fractures, the incidence has increased following the implementation of seat belt legislation. Sternal fractures may occur in association with cardiothoracic injuries, rib fractures, craniocerebral injuries, whiplash injuries and spinal injuries. 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebral Artery Injuries Associated with Cervical Spine Trauma
    Vertebral Artery Injuries Associated with Cervical Spine Trauma Scott D. Daffner, M.D. Associate Professor Department of Orthopaedics West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown, WV USA Introduction a. Incidence of vertebral artery injury (VAI) i. 0.5% of all trauma patients ii. 70% of VAI in blunt trauma has associated cervical fracture iii. 33%-39% of all cervical spine fractures b. Impact of VAI difficult to predict i. Not all patients symptomatic ii. Variable symptomatology II. Anatomy a. 4 segments i. Most injuries from cervical trauma in V2 (foraminal segment) b. Types of injury i. Intimal tear ii. Dissection iii. Pseudoaneurysm iv. Occlusion v. Transection Cloud G , and Markus H QJM 2003;96:27-54 III. Injury Patterns a. V2 segment (foraminal) most commonly injured b. Mechanism i. Direct trauma (bone fragments) ii. Stretching (dislocation / subluxation) c. Most common fracture / injury i. Transverse foramen ii. Subluxation or dislocation iii. Upper cervical injury (C1-C3) d. Associated conditions i. Basilar skull fracture ii. Occipitocervical dissociation iii. Ankylosing Spondylitis / DISH Woodring Vaccaro Miller Kral Cothren Ding Even (1993) (1998) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2010) (2012) TP / Foramen Transversarium 88% 25% 48% 8% \ - 17% Facet Subluxation / Dislocation - 40% 44% 21% 33% - 63% Upper Cervical (C1-C3) - - - - / 18% 25% I. Screening a. Modalities i. Digital subtraction angiography (gold standard) ii. CT Angiography iii. MR Angiography b. Criteria i. No definite established Criteria for Ordering CTA (Head & Neck) criteria West Virginia University ii. Varies by institution Unexplained or incongruous central or lateralizing neurologic deficit iii. East & West Trauma Evidence of acute cerebral infarct on Head CT Assoc.’s criteria Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluations of Sternal Fracture Guideline
    Evaluations of Sternal Fracture Guideline Presenting complaints of : Anterior chest wall pain Sternal pain Obtain Imaging: Substernal pain CT chest or lateral sternal xray Anterior chest wall ecchymosis Sternal fracture present on imaging Consider the wide differential: Rib fractures, CT angiogram chest with contrast. Flail chest, - Include CT angiogram of neck if Vertebral and spine injuries concurrent 1st rib fx. Solid organ injuries Pulmonary contusions Major vascular injuries. Monitor VS 12 lead on initial evaluation and repeat 12 lead in 6 hours *Echo not recommended as initial screening tool for isolated fx’s nor CK-MB as a diagnostic tool (EAST) Isolated Sternal Fx with Isolated Sternal Fx with abnormal Sternal Fx with associated normal ECG ECG injuries --Treat associated injuries --IF normal VS, --IF VS unstable or --IF both 12 leads --IF EKG shows heart block, ST IF VS unstable or without signs of acute changes or arrthymias IF EKG shows heart block, ST process and changes or arrthymias --IF pain controlled and -- Admit to telemetry for 24 --IF age < 65 with no hours -- Admit to IMC or ICU cardiac hx -- Obtain Echocardiogram -- Obtain Echocardiogram -- Follow Blunt Cardiac Injury -- Follow Blunt Cardiac Injury DC to home with pain Algorithm Algorithm meds -- Follow pain control and -- Follow pain control and respiratory toilet rec’s from Rib respiratory toilet rec’s from Rib Fracture Management Guideline. Fracture Management Guideline Indications for Thoracic Surgery Consult: Indications for Thoracic Surgery Consult: Acute fracture Chronic fracture - Unstable fracture - Chronic severe pain - Compression from fractured - Non-union or malunion. segment - Signs of infection: Sternal click, - Severe pain erythema etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sternal Fracture
    Sternal fracture What is a sternal fracture? The sternum or breastbone is the bone in the front and center of the chest. Your ribs and clavicle (collar bone) attach to your sternum. A sternal fracture is a break in this bone. The most common cause of a sternal fracture is trauma. It can occur with direct blow to front of your chest, fall or motor vehicle accidents where your chest hits the steering wheel or seat belt. Common symptoms include: Chest pain at time and site of injury Pain with breathing, coughing, or sneezing Shortness of breath Bruising and tenderness of front of chest. Diagnosis: The fracture may have been found with an x-ray or CT scan. An EKG or ultrasound may be performed to look at your heart, major blood vessels, and lungs to make sure there is no damage to these organs. Treatment: Most sternal fractures will heal in several weeks and do not require surgery. Treatment will often be pain control and avoiding activities that may reinjure your sternum. It is important to continue to take deep breaths and cough to prevent pneumonia. It is important you do not smoke as this will slow bone healing. Continue to take your pain medications as prescribed. These are some precautions to help you while your sternum heals: - Brace your chest when coughing, sneezing, or turning. You will need to hold a pillow or cross your arms over your chest (this is called splinting). This is most important to prevent pneumonia. - Do not lift push or pull anything over 10 pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Pericardial Injury from Chest Compression: a Case Report Of
    Aoyagi et al. Journal of Intensive Care (2018) 6:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0325-5 CASE REPORT Open Access Pericardial injury from chest compression: a case report of incidental release of cardiac tamponade Shigeaki Aoyagi*, Tomokazu Kosuga, Kumiko Wada, Shin-ichi Nata and Hiroshi Yasunaga Abstract Background: Although chest compression is a standard technique in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, it is well recognized that manual chest compression causes various internal injuries, of which major injuries are often fatal. Similarly, when cardiac tamponade occurs in patients with type A acute aortic dissection, many patients die before reaching the hospital. We report a rare case in which chest compressions caused pericardial laceration that may have inadvertently played a life-saving role in releasing cardiac tamponade induced by acute aortic dissection. Case presentation: A 67-year-old woman developed cardiac arrest soon after complaining of epigastric pain, and after successful resuscitation by manual chest compression, she was transferred to our hospital. On arrival, the patient was 14 on the Glasgow Coma Scale. An ECG showed a normal sinus rhythm, and no arrhythmias or signs of myocardial ischemia were observed. A chest X-ray revealed left pleural effusion, while cardiomegaly and pneumothorax were not identified. Computed tomography revealed type A aortic dissection, mild pericardial effusion, and massive left pleural effusion. No pulmonary embolus was found on the CT. After drainage of bloody effusion from the left pleural space, an emergency operation was begun. During surgery, a pericardial laceration with communication to the left pleural space and a hemothorax were found; however, no cardiac injury was identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture of the Sternum in Children L P Ferguson, a G Wilkinson, T F Beattie
    518 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Emerg Med J: first published as 10.1136/emj.20.6.518 on 17 November 2003. Downloaded from Fracture of the sternum in children L P Ferguson, A G Wilkinson, T F Beattie ............................................................................................................................... Emerg Med J 2003;20:518–520 Objective: Sternal fracture is poorly characterised in children. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the mechanism, radiological characteristics, and accompanying injuries of sternal fracture in children. Methods: The study was retrospective. The records of all children who underwent plain radiography of the sternum, or computed tomography of the thorax after trauma, over a 40 month period in our paediatric hospital were reviewed for evidence of sternal fracture. See end of article for Results: 12 of 33 children identified had radiological evidence of sternal fracture. The age range of authors’ affiliations children with fractures was 5 to 12 years. Eleven children had fracture of the anterior cortex of the first or ....................... second sternebra of the body of the sternum. One child had fracture through the manubriosternal joint with Correspondence to: posterior displacement of the body. Seven fractures resulted from direct blows to the anterior chest, five T F Beattie, Royal Hospital fractures resulted from hyperflexion injury of the thoracic spine. None were the result of motor vehicle for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, crash. All fractures were isolated injuries. Scotland; Louise.Cowan@ Conclusions: Sternal fracture is uncommon in children. Injury may result from direct or indirect violence. luht.scot.nhs.uk The child’s sternum is commonly fractured by more minor blunt trauma than generally recognised in the Accepted for publication literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Isolated Sternal Fracture with Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Nerve Block: a Case Report and Literature Review
    Kosin Medical Journal 2019;34:152-160. https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.2019.34.2.152 &D VH 5HSRUWV Treatment of Isolated Sternal Fracture with Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Nerve Block: a Case Report and Literature Review Jun-Mo Park 1, Hyunjeong Kim 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook Na - tional University Hospital, Daegu, Korea In the case of isolated sternal fractures, conservative treatment with analgesics is common, but pain can persist for more than 10 weeks, which can significantly interfere with daily life. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block is reported to be a successful means of pain control in patients with chest wall injury or rib fracture. A 70-year-old female patient presented with anterior chest pain that had persisted for 2 weeks despite conservative treat - ment. Sagittal reconstruction chest computed tomography and sternum lateral oblique x-ray revealed an isolated sternal fracture. An ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral nerve block was performed for pain control. After performing the procedure twice at a 1-week interval, the patient reported complete pain alleviation, and no other problems were observed over the 3-month follow-up period. Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral nerve block can help patients with isolated sternal fractures to manage pain and return to normal activities sooner than with oral analgesics. Key Words : Fracture, Nerve block, Pain management, Sternum, Ultrasonography Sternal fractures are not uncommon and have to the internal thoracic organs, with isolated ster - been reported to occur in 3.7% of patients hos - nal fractures considered benign lesions in the ab - pitalized after a traffic accident.
    [Show full text]