Children with Disabilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Children with Disabilities Disabilities www.futureofchildren.org The Future of Children Children with Disabilities VOLUME 22 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2012 3 Children with Disabilities: Introducing the Issue 13 The Changing Landscape of Disability in Childhood 43 Childhood Health: Trends and Consequences over the Life Course 65 The Economic Costs of Childhood Disability Volume 22 Number 1 Spring 2012 Volume 97 Disability and the Education System 123 Health Insurance and Children with Disabilities 149 How Can Quality Improvement Enhance the Lives of Children with Disabilities? 169 Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability 193 Prevention of Disability in Children: Elevating the Role of Environment A COLLABORATION OF THE WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT A COLLABORATION OF THE WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION The Future of Children seeks to translate high-level research into information that is useful Board of Advisors to policy makers, practitioners, and the media. Lawrence Balter Marguerite Kondracke The Future of Children is a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and New York University America’s Promise—The Alliance for Youth International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution. Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Rebecca Maynard Columbia University University of Pennsylvania Senior Editorial Staff Journal Staff Judith Feder Lynn Thoman Sara McLanahan Kris McDonald Georgetown University Corporate Perspectives Editor-in-Chief Associate Editor William Galston Heather B. Weiss Princeton University Princeton University Brookings Institution Harvard University Director, Center for Research on Lauren Moore University of Maryland Child Wellbeing, and William S. Tod Amy Wilkins Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Project Manager Princeton University Kay S. Hymowitz Education Reform Now Ron Haskins Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Senior Editor Brenda Szittya Charles N. Kahn III Brookings Institution Managing Editor Federation of American Hospitals Senior Fellow and Co-Director, Center on Princeton University Children and Families Martha Gottron Christina Paxson Managing Editor Senior Editor Princeton University Princeton University Lisa Markman-Pithers Dean, Woodrow Wilson School of Public Outreach Director and International Affairs, and Hughes-Rogers Princeton University Professor of Economics and Public Affairs Mary Jones Cecilia Rouse Outreach Coordinator Senior Editor Brookings Institution Princeton University Director, Education Research Section, Regina Leidy and Katzman-Ernst Professor in the Communications Coordinator Economics of Education and Professor of Princeton University Economics and Public Affairs Tracy Merone The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of the Woodrow Isabel Sawhill Administrator Wilson School at Princeton University or the Brookings Institution. Senior Editor Princeton University Copyright © 2012 by The Trustees of Princeton University Brookings Institution Senior Fellow, Cabot Family Chair, and This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Co-Director, Center on Children and Families Unported License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0. Authorization to reproduce articles is allowed with proper attribution: “From The Future of Children, a collaboration of the The Future of Children would like to thank the David and Lucille Packard Foundation for its Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the generous support. Brookings Institution.” To purchase a print copy, access free electronic copies, or sign up for our e-newsletter, go to ISSN: 1054-8289 our website, www.futureofchildren.org. If you would like additional information about the ISBN: 978-0-9814705-8-0 journal, please send questions to [email protected]. VOLUME 22 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2012 Children with Disabilities 3 Children with Disabilities: Introducing the Issue by Janet Currie and Robert Kahn 13 The Changing Landscape of Disability in Childhood by Neal Halfon, Amy Houtrow, Kandyce Larson, and Paul W. Newacheck 43 Childhood Health: Trends and Consequences over the Life Course by Liam Delaney and James P. Smith 65 The Economic Costs of Childhood Disability by Mark Stabile and Sara Allin 97 Disability and the Education System by Laudan Aron and Pamela Loprest 123 Health Insurance and Children with Disabilities by Peter G. Szilagyi 149 How Can Quality Improvement Enhance the Lives of Children with Disabilities? by James M. Perrin 169 Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability by Paul H. Wise 193 Prevention of Disability in Children: Elevating the Role of Environment by Stephen A. Rauch and Bruce P. Lanphear www.futureofchildren.org Children with Disabilities: Introducing the Issue Children with Disabilities: Introducing the Issue Janet Currie and Robert Kahn This issue of The Future of Children explores health care quality. The volume concludes childhood disability—its prevalence, nature, with a discussion of the prevention of child- treatment, and consequences. With unprec- hood disability. edented numbers of U.S. children now being identified as having special medical Themes of the Volume and educational needs and with the nation’s Out of the research presented in this volume, resources for addressing those needs increas- five broad themes emerge. These themes are ingly constrained, the topic is timely. related to defining and measuring disability; trends in disability; the growing importance Public discussion of childhood disability, by of mental relative to physical health; the the media, parents, scholars, and advocates importance of families; and the fragmenta- alike, tends to emphasize particular causes of tion of services for children with disabilities. disability, such as autism, asthma, cystic fibro- sis, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Defining Disability and Other (ADHD). In this volume, however, we focus Measurement Issues not on individual disabilities, but rather on First, it is remarkably difficult to point to cross-cutting themes that apply more broadly a consensus definition of disability. In the to the issue of children with disabilities. opening article of the issue Neal Halfon and Kandyce Larson, both of the University of To this end, we commissioned a group of California–Los Angeles, and Paul Newacheck experts to review research on childhood dis- and Amy Houtrow, both of the University of ability, including its definition (itself a chal- California–San Francisco, make the case for lenge), its prevalence and trends over time a definition that highlights the relationship (likewise), and the costs it imposes both on between health, functioning, and the environ- the individual child and on the child’s fam- ment. Specifically, the authors propose that a ily. Our contributors also consider disability disability be defined as “an environmentally within the context of the nation’s educational, contextualized health-related limitation in health insurance, and medical systems; the a child’s existing or emergent capacity to impact of emerging technologies on the perform developmentally appropriate activi- experience of disability; and the definition of ties and participate, as desired, in society.” Janet Currie is the Henry Putnam Professor of Economics and Public Affairs and the Director of the Center for Health and Wellbeing at Princeton University. Robert Kahn is an associate professor of pediatrics at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. VOL. 22 / NO. 1 / SPRING 2012 3 Janet Currie and Robert Kahn Defining disability as a limitation rather than the measure of disability. Research based on a health condition per se highlights the social historical data (which analysts use to examine and technological context of the individual. disability over the life course) consists almost In a world with electric wheelchairs, for entirely of information about the presence or example, a child with impaired mobility will absence of specific conditions. Clearly, there be less disabled than he or she would be is little uniformity across time periods or otherwise. It follows then that home and studies in the definition of disability. school environments can shape disability and that new technologies can either mitigate or exacerbate disability, as Paul Wise, of Stan- ford University, discusses in his article on the Defining disability as a role of technology. The definition proposed limitation rather than a by Halfon, Houtrow, Larson, and Newacheck also emphasizes that disability exists along a health condition per se continuum and varies across children’s ages highlights the social and and functional domains. technological context of the Until now empirical work on the prevalence individual. of childhood disability has been based on a variety of simpler and more concrete defini- tions. National surveys that collect informa- Beyond the challenge of defining and tion about childhood disabilities, for example, measuring disability, many of the articles generally ask questions about limitations on in the volume highlight ancillary measure- activities of daily living; they also usually clas- ment issues. For example, Peter Szilagyi, sify children as disabled if they are receiving of the University of Rochester, addresses services for their limitations. Although the the challenge of comparing
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Studies Center Canadian Studies Center
    WINTER QUARTER REPORT 2009 CANADIANCANADIAN STUDIESSTUDIES CENTERCENTER HENRY M. JACKSON SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH | TEACHING | OUTREACH ARCTIC SOVEREIGNTY: A TEN-WEEK CRASH COURSE BY PATRICK LENNON Patrick Lennon is a newly-minted alumnus of the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies at the University of Washington. He was one of thirteen International Studies students enrolled in SIS 495C Task Force on Arctic Sovereignty, taught by Canadian Studies Center Associate Director, Nadine Fabbi, and Center Affiliate, Vincent Gallucci, Aquatic and Fishery Sciences. After graduation, Patrick plans to work and consider his options for graduate school. During this past fall quarter, I was along with Emily Epsten, to write faced with the question that awaits the chapter on North America and every student in International Studies the Arctic. Canada and the United – which Task Force did I want to States both have significant interests take? Task Force is a senior capstone in the Arctic, so Emily and I dove project where students work in into the wealth of information from groups to write a policy paper about governments, academics, and a current issue. When I looked at the non-governmental organizations list of choices, one jumped out at (NGOs). We chose to focus on the me immediately – Arctic sovereignty. Northwest Passage, which runs It was an issue that I didn’t even through Canada’s Arctic archipelago know existed, but it encompassed and is slowly opening to increased several of my interests, including shipping as ice cover melts. The US international law and human rights, and Canada dispute the legal status particularly the rights of indigenous of the Passage, so we thought it peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 335 443 CE 057 484 AUTHOR Bossort
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 335 443 CE 057 484 AUTHOR Bossort, Patty, Ed.; And Others TITLE Literacy 2000: Make the Next Ten Years Matter. Conference Summary (New Westminster, British Columbia, October 18-21, 1990). INSTITUTION British Columbia Ministry of Advanced Education, Training and Technology, Victoria.; Douglas Coll., New Westminster (British Columbia).; National Literacy Secretariat, Ottawa (Ontario). REPORT NO ISBN-0-7718-8995-X PUB DATE Oct 90 NOTE 184p. PUB TYPE Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; Adult Literacy; *Community Involvement; Community Services; Cultural Awareness; Demonstration Programs; Developed Nations; Foreign Countries; *Illiteracy; Industrial Education; *Literacy Education; Models; Multicultural Education; On the Job Training; *Outreach Programs; Program Effectiveness; Recruitment; Research Utilization; Teacher Certification; Teacher Education IDENTIFIERS Canada; England; Wales; *Workplace Literacy ABSTRACT _. This conference summary contains 36 presentations. Participants' comments, taken from response cards, are quoted . throughout. Presentations from the Opening Plenary include a keynote address--"What Is Literacy?: Critical Issues for the Next Decade" (John Ryan) and four "Panzlist Presentations" (Francis Kazemek, Lorraine Fox, Joyce White, Robin Silverman). Papers in the section, "Evening with Fernando Cardenal," are "Background" (Evelyn Murialdo); "Introduction" (David Cadman); "Special Presentation" (Fernando Cardenal); and "Closing
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines and Autism: What You Should Know | Vaccine Education
    Q A Vaccines and Autism: What you should know Volume& 1 Summer 2008 Some parents of children with autism are concerned that vaccines are the cause. Their concerns center on three areas: the combination measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine; thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative previously contained in several vaccines; and the notion that babies receive too many vaccines too soon. Q. What are the symptoms of autism? Q. Does the MMR vaccine cause autism? A. Symptoms of autism, which typically appear during the A. No. In 1998, a British researcher named Andrew Wakefi eld fi rst few years of life, include diffi culties with behavior, social raised the notion that the MMR vaccine might cause autism. skills and communication. Specifi cally, children with autism In the medical journal The Lancet, he reported the stories of may have diffi culty interacting socially with parents, siblings eight children who developed autism and intestinal problems and other people; have diffi culty with transitions and need soon after receiving the MMR vaccine. To determine whether routine; engage in repetitive behaviors such as hand fl apping Wakefi eld’s suspicion was correct, researchers performed or rocking; display a preoccupation with activities or toys; a series of studies comparing hundreds of thousands of and suffer a heightened sensitivity to noise and sounds. children who had received the MMR vaccine with hundreds Autism spectrum disorders vary in the type and severity of of thousands who had never received the vaccine. They found the symptoms they cause, so two children with autism may that the risk of autism was the same in both groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotechnology and Consumer Decision-Making
    SAX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2017 2:44 PM Biotechnology and Consumer Decision-Making Joanna K. Sax* ABSTRACT Society is facing major challenges in climate change, health care and overall quality of life. Scientific advances to address these areas continue to grow, with overwhelming evidence that the application of highly tested forms of biotechnology is safe and effective. Despite scientific consensus in these areas, consumers appear reluctant to support their use. Research that helps to understand consumer decision-making and the public’s resistance to biotechnologies such as vaccines, fluoridated water programs and genetically engineered food, will provide great social value. This article is forward-thinking in that it suggests that important research in behavioral decision-making, specifically affect and ambiguity, can be used to help consumers make informed choices about major applications of biotechnology. This article highlights some of the most controversial examples: vaccinations, genetically engineered food, rbST treated dairy cows, fluoridated water, and embryonic stem cell research. In many of these areas, consumers perceive the risks as high, but the experts calculate the risks as low. Four major thematic approaches are proposed to create a roadmap for policymakers to consider for policy design and implementation in controversial areas of biotechnology. This article articulates future directions for studies that implement decision-making research to allow consumers to appropriately assign risk to their options and make informed decisions. * Visiting Faculty Member, James E. Rogers College of Law – University of Arizona (Fall 2016); Professor of Law, California Western School of Law; J.D., University of Pennsylvania Law School; Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Transcript Health and Behavior Lecture Companion to the Text
    Transcript Health and Behavior Lecture companion to the text, Chapter 7, “Health and Behavior.” 1. Welcome to the lecture on Health and Behavior. The lecture is a companion to Jonas & Kovner’s Health Care Delivery in the United States, chapter 7. 2. The objectives of this presentation are: Explain personal health behavior’s impact on individual and population health status Define approaches for addressing behavioral risk factors Relate the importance of trust in public health 3. Health behaviors significantly contribute to individual and population health. As you probably have learned in your Health, Behavior, and Society class (HSC 4211), these are the most important behavioral risk factors in the U.S.: tobacco use, alcohol abuse, sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy diet, and overweight & obesity. As you’ve learned, a core public health function is policy development. Within this function is the key public health service to “inform, educate, and empower people about health issues.” This key service is what this Health and Behavior lecture is about. 4. Because these behaviors lead to poorer health outcomes, public health aims to change these behaviors. To make a difference at the population level, our interventions as public health professionals must address all people, not just those that are motivated to change. But, how do we approach this? In this section of this lecture, I will discuss these three approaches to health promotion. First, the social ecological model to health promotion, then social marketing, and, lastly, chronic condition self-care. There are many more perspectives to health promotion, some of which your textbook addresses, but I want know these key approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrupted Infrastructures of Meaning: Post-Truth Identities Online
    Corrupted Infrastructures of Meaning: Post-truth Identities Online Catherine R. Baker and Andrew Chadwick1 Forthcoming in Howard Tumber and Silvio Waisbord (eds) (2021) The Routledge Companion to Media Misinformation and Populism. New York: Routledge. May 12, 2020. Summary This article outlines a framework for analyzing post-truth identities. Our overarching argument is that post-truth identities emerge from a confluence of individual-level and contextual factors. Cognitive biases that shape how individuals encounter and process information have recently been granted freer rein as a result of changes in the technological basis of media systems in the advanced democracies. But in addition to these macro- structural changes, we suggest that attention should also focus on how post-truth identities come to be formed and maintained at the micro level, in everyday life. Drawing upon the social identity theory tradition in social psychology, we assume that identity is inextricably tied to group formation and the maintenance of group belonging. Post-truth identities rely upon corrupted, self-initiated infrastructures of meaning that are animated by emotional narratives and repositories of cherry-picked, misrepresented justifying ‘evidence.’ These infrastructures are, in part, enabled by the unique affordances of social media for decentralizing, but also algorithmically organizing, the production and circulation of socially consequential information. Identity affirmation is reinforced by the major online platforms’ commercially driven, personalized recommendation features, such as Google search’s autosuggest, YouTube’s autoplay, and Facebook’s news feed. The affordances these create contribute to shared experiences among believers but can also make it more likely that larger audiences are exposed to falsehoods as part of everyday searching, reading, viewing, and sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Shows Vaccines Unrelated to Autism
    Evidence Shows Vaccines Unrelated to Autism Claims that vaccines cause autism have led some parents but the past decade of research has supported the role of to delay or refuse vaccines for their children. Some of the genetics in an autism diagnosis. In fact, no scientific question most common claims are that autism is caused by measles- into the causes of autism has been better researched, tested, mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, vaccines that contain and examined as the role of vaccines in autism. Volumes thimerosal, or by too many vaccines. Many studies have been of evidence show no link between the two. done to test these claims. None has shown that vaccines This sheet lays out the facts to help parents understand cause autism. The real causes of autism are not fully known, why experts do not think vaccines cause autism. Medical and legal authorities agree that no evidence The causes of autism are not fully understood, exists that vaccines cause autism. but the evidence does not point toward vaccines. The Institute of Medicine is an impartial group of the world’s Parents often first notice the behaviors of autism when their leading experts that advises Congress on science issues. After child is 18–24 months old – the age by which most childhood reviewing more than 200 studies in 2004 and more than 1,000 vaccines have been given. Because of this, many parents incor- studies in 2011, the consensus report strongly stated that rectly associate vaccination with the onset of autism. Develop- the evidence did not show a link between vaccines and autism.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts for Parents About Autism and Vaccine Safety from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Facts for Parents About Autism and Vaccine Safety From the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) The AAP understands that vaccine safety is an ongoing concern for parents of young children, and supports ongoing research in this area. In addition, the AAP supports further research into the causes of autism. The following information is to help parents and caregivers to understand some of the common issues and questions surrounding this topic. WHAT IS AUTISM? Autism is not a specific disease, but rather a collection of disorders of brain development called “autism spectrum disorders,” or ASDs. Autism has a strong genetic basis. Studies show that the incidence of autism has risen. The apparent increase in autism may be due to a combination of factors. For example, more and more behaviors and disorders are being included in the definition of in the definition of ASD than in the past. Also, the public and the medical profession recognize these disorders more often. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 1 in 150 children have an ASD. Although many theories have been discussed, the cause or causes of autism are not known More research is being done every year to try to identify the causes and improve efforts to prevent, diagnose and treat ASDs. The nation’s top experts in pediatric neurology, genetics, and other fields are moving closer to answers about this group of disorders. Early diagnosis is crucial. Pediatricians should screen all children for ASDs at 18 and 24 months. They should also listen carefully to parents about their child’s development.
    [Show full text]
  • VAXXED – a Conspiracy Theory Science Fiction Film
    Trust no one except when they agree with you. Big Pharma is everywhere It is all a conspiracy 1 Your children were poisoned Trust no one except when they agree with you. Big Pharma is everywhere When Wakefield says he lost his country, this may refer to there being an outstanding warrant for his arrest in the UK. The warrant arose from his being found guilty of malpractice by the British Medical Council as I was told by a reliable source. To this day, I have found no online corroboration of this. But still...? At the end of the X Files television show in the 1990’s, one columnist summed the show up perfectly for me. They wrote it was ‘What stupid people think is clever’. Please dip in and out of any part of this document. It is written as a collection of stand alone statements in a loosely connecting style. For the sake of brevity – this is the short version of my report on the Vaxxed film - I assume the reader has a knowledge of the people mentioned. It is all a conspiracy 2 Your children were poisoned Trust no one except when they agree with you. Big Pharma is everywhere What exactly would it take to convince the global Anti Vaccination movement the world over that any single vaccine was safe? I am still trying to find an answer to that question. It looks to me like it is not possible. The Stealthy Aspie, 2017. It is all a conspiracy 3 Your children were poisoned Trust no one except when they agree with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Incubation Period of Measles from Exposure to Prodrome ■ Exposure to Rash Onset Averages 11 to 12 Days
    Measles Paul Gastanaduy, MD; Penina Haber, MPH; Paul A. Rota, PhD; and Manisha Patel, MD, MS Measles is an acute, viral, infectious disease. References to measles can be found from as early as the 7th century. The Measles disease was described by the Persian physician Rhazes in the ● Acute viral infectious disease 10th century as “more to be dreaded than smallpox.” ● First described in 7th century In 1846, Peter Panum described the incubation period of ● Vaccines first licensed include measles and lifelong immunity after recovery from the disease. measles in 1963, MMR in 1971, John Enders and Thomas Chalmers Peebles isolated the virus in and MMRV in 2005 human and monkey kidney tissue culture in 1954. The first live, ● Infection nearly universal attenuated vaccine (Edmonston B strain) was licensed for use in during childhood in the United States in 1963. In 1971, a combined measles, mumps, prevaccine era and rubella (MMR) vaccine was licensed for use in the United ● Still common and often fatal States. In 2005, a combination measles, mumps, rubella, and in developing countries varicella (MMRV) vaccine was licensed. Before a vaccine was available, infection with measles virus was nearly universal during childhood, and more than 90% of persons were immune due to past infection by age 15 years. Measles is still a common and often fatal disease in developing countries. The World Health Organization estimates there were 142,300 deaths from measles globally in 2018. In the United 13 States, there have been recent outbreaks; the largest occurring in 2019 primarily among people who were not vaccinated.
    [Show full text]
  • Téma Očkování a Dezinformace V Českém Informačním Prostoru
    PRAGUE SECURITY STUDIES INSTITUTE (PSSI) / ČERVEN 2019 TÉMA OČKOVÁNÍ A DEZINFORMACE V ČESKÉM INFORMAČNÍM PROSTORU Autor: Lenka Dušková OBSAH Shrnutí 3 Úvod 5 Očkování v mezinárodním kontextu 5 Systém očkování v České republice 7 Česká debata o očkování 8 Analýza debaty o očkování na webech se sporným obsahem v roce 2018 10 Populární negativní narativy 11 Nejaktivnější platformy 13 Závěr 17 Příloha 18 Sběr dat byl proveden pomocí nástroje > versus< vyvinutého v rámci Beacon Project realizovaného International Republican Institute. SHRNUTÍ • Světová zdravotnická organizace počátkem • Negativní články o očkování publikovalo roku 2019 zařadila nedůvěru vůči očková- celkem 18 webových stránek. Nejčastěji se ní na seznam globálních hrozeb. Navzdory jednalo o webovou stránku Rozalio.cz, před- strategickým plánům na vymýcení řady in- stavující oficiální portál spolku Rozalio – Rodiče fekčních nemocí, které indikovaly úplnou za lepší informovanost a svobodnou volbu eradikaci spalniček do konce roku 2020, se svět v očkování, z. s. (19 příspěvků), dále webo- naopak potýká s jejich zvyšujícím se výsky- vou stránku Nwoo.org – New World Order tem. Odmítání očkování je propagováno jak Opposition Organisation (10 příspěvků) a webo- antivakcinačními skupinami, které využíva- vou stránku Czech Free Press (10 příspěvků). 3 jí internetu a zejména sociálních sítí pro šíření svých narativů, tak ale i populistickými stra- • Zastřešujícím narativem všech 76 negativ- ORU nami v Itálii, Polsku, Francii či na Slovensku. ních článků bylo, že vakcíny jsou neefektivní T Kromě možného zneužití otázky vakcinace pro a nebezpečné. Mezi nejpopulárnější negativ- čním prOS účely vnitropolitických úspěchů se téma oč- ní narativy o očkování patřily ty poukazující na A kování rovněž stalo předmětem zájmu třetích negativní důsledky očkování (zejména tvrze- aktérů – jmenovitě Ruska, jehož Výzkumná ní, že vakcíny způsobují autismus) a narativy internetová agentura (tzv.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination Beliefs Among Parents in Marin County, California: Opportunities for New Understanding
    Vaccination beliefs among parents in Marin County, California: Opportunities for new understanding Jasmine Carver, MPH Sharayn Forkel, RN, MS Jessica Cunningham-Krahl, MPH Karina Arambula, MPH Rochelle Ereman, MS, MPH Matthew Willis, MD, MPH CSTE Annual Conference 2015 Marin County, California • Affluent county in the San Francisco Bay Area • Population ~256,000 people • National attention for vaccine hesitancy • Marin-specific reasons that parents requested vaccine exemptions were not well known California Personal Belief Exemptions (PBEs) • Exemptions from required immunizations if immunization is contrary to parent or guardian beliefs • New 2014 California Law – Assembly Bill (AB) 2109 – Requires documented conversation with health care practitioners to receive exemption – Religious exception Kindergarten PBE Rates in Marin County and California, 1999-2013 Marin California 8% 7.6% 7.1% 6.8% 7% 5.8% 6% 5% 4.2% 3.8% 4% 2.8% 3.2% 3% 2.4% 1.9% 2.0% 2% 1.6% 1.2% 1.2% 1.3% 1% 0.7% 0% 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: California Department of Public Health Immunization Branch, Statewide Kindergarten Assessment Kindergarten Personal Belief Exemption Rates in Marin County by School Type, 2013-2014 3500 3000 6.1% PBE 2500 2000 1500 Without PBE Students With PBE 1000 15.1% PBE 500 0 Public Private School Type Study Purpose Better understand vaccine decision-making in Marin to equip providers for conversations required under the new law Specific Aims: • Identify differences between parents who choose PBEs compared with those who do
    [Show full text]