DOCSLIB.ORG

Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Sandusky River (Lower) and Bay Tributaries Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Sandusky River (Lower) and Bay Tributaries Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Sandusky River (lower) and Bay Tributaries Watershed Division of Surface Water Final Report May 28, 2014 Cover photo: Wolf Creek at Township Line Rd., Sandusky County, Ohio. Sandusky River and Bay Tributaries Nutrient and Sediment TMDLs May 28, 2014 Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. 1468 West Ninth Street, Suite 620 Cleveland, OH 44113 Sandusky River and Bay Tributaries Nutrient and Sediment TMDLs Contents Tables ........................................................................................................................................................... iii Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... vi Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... vii Units of Measure ........................................................................................................................................ viii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... x 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Water Quality Standards and Impairments ........................................................................................... 4 2.1 Designated Uses ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Numeric Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Narrative Criteria and Guidance ................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Lake Erie Targets .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Impairments ................................................................................................................................ 10 3 Watershed Characterization ................................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Lake Erie Western Basin............................................................................................................. 12 3.2 Previous Studies .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Project Setting ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Land Use and Land Cover .......................................................................................................... 18 3.5 Geology and Soils ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.6 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 23 3.7 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 25 3.8 Community Profile ...................................................................................................................... 29 4 Source Assessment .............................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Pollutants of Concern .................................................................................................................. 31 4.2 Point Sources .............................................................................................................................. 35 4.3 Nonpoint Sources ........................................................................................................................ 50 4.4 Soil and Water Assessment Tool ................................................................................................ 59 4.5 Load Duration Curves ................................................................................................................. 60 5 Linkage Analysis: Tributaries to Sandusky Bay ................................................................................. 62 5.1 Pipe Creek-Frontal Sandusky Bay (HUC 04100011 01 02) ....................................................... 63 5.2 Mills Creek (HUC 04100011 01 03) ........................................................................................... 67 5.3 Frontal south side of Sandusky Bay (HUC 04100011 02 01) ..................................................... 73 5.4 Pickerel Creek (HUC 04100011 02 03) ...................................................................................... 76 5.5 Raccoon Creek (HUC 04100011 02 04) ..................................................................................... 78 5.6 South Creek (HUC 04100011 02 05) .......................................................................................... 83 6 Linkage Analysis: Tributaries of the Sandusky River (Lower) .......................................................... 86 6.1 East Branch East Branch Wolf Creek (HUC 04100011 10 01) .................................................. 87 6.2 Town of New Riegel-East Branch Wolf Creek (HUC 04100011 10 02) .................................... 91 6.3 Wolf Creek (HUC 04100011 10 04) ........................................................................................... 94 6.4 Spicer Creek-Sandusky River (HUC 04100011 11 05) .............................................................. 98 6.5 Beaver Creek (HUC 04100011 12 02) ...................................................................................... 100 6.6 Green Creek (HUC 04100011 12 03) ....................................................................................... 103 6.7 Muskellunge Creek (HUC 04100011 13 01) ............................................................................ 106 6.8 Mouth Sandusky River (HUC 04100011 13 03)....................................................................... 111 6.9 Little Muddy Creek (HUC 04100011 14 03) ............................................................................ 113 6.10 Town of Lindsay-Muddy Creek (HUC 04100011 14 04) ......................................................... 116 7 Linkage Analysis: Sandusky River (Lower) ..................................................................................... 120 7.1 Ohio EPA Monitoring Data ...................................................................................................... 121 7.2 National Center for Water Quality Research Monitoring Data................................................. 123 - ii - Sandusky River and Bay Tributaries Nutrient and Sediment TMDLs 7.3 Sources of Impairment .............................................................................................................. 124 8 TMDL and Allocations ..................................................................................................................... 128 8.1 Load Duration Curves ............................................................................................................... 128 8.2 Allocations ................................................................................................................................ 128 8.3 Summary of TMDLs ................................................................................................................. 131 9 Water Quality Improvement Strategy ............................................................................................... 138 9.1 Point Sources ............................................................................................................................ 140 9.2 Agricultural Runoff ................................................................................................................... 141 9.3 Urban Runoff ............................................................................................................................ 143 9.4 Watershed Specific Recommendations ..................................................................................... 144 9.5 Reasonable Assurances ............................................................................................................. 145 10 References ..................................................................................................................................... 147 Appendix A. Waterbodies, Designated Uses, Impairments, and Assessment Sites Appendix B. Additional Watershed Characterization Information Appendix C. Additional Source Assessment Information Appendix D. SWAT Model Report Appendix E. Pollutant Load Maps of SWAT Model Results Appendix F. SWAT Source Load Results by Impaired WAU Appendix G. Load Duration Curves Appendix H. Summary of NCWQR Data Appendix I. Storm Water Permittees Appendix J. Allocation Tables Appendix K. Implementation through the NPDES Program Appendix L. Implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Lake Erie Lighthouses
    U.S. Lake Erie Lighthouses Gretchen S. Curtis Lakeside, Ohio July 2011 U.S. Lighthouse Organizations • Original Light House Service 1789 – 1851 • Quasi-military Light House Board 1851 – 1910 • Light House Service under the Department of Commerce 1910 – 1939 • Final incorporation of the service into the U.S. Coast Guard in 1939. In the beginning… Lighthouse Architects & Contractors • Starting in the 1790s, contractors bid on LH construction projects advertised in local newspapers. • Bids reviewed by regional Superintendent of Lighthouses, a political appointee, who informed U.S. Treasury Dept of his selection. • Superintendent approved final contract and supervised contractor during building process. Creation of Lighthouse Board • Effective in 1852, U.S. Lighthouse Board assumed all duties related to navigational aids. • U.S. divided into 12 LH districts with inspector (naval officer) assigned to each district. • New LH construction supervised by district inspector with primary focus on quality over cost, resulting in greater LH longevity. • Soon, an engineer (army officer) was assigned to each district to oversee construction & maintenance of lights. Lighthouse Bd Responsibilities • Location of new / replacement lighthouses • Appointment of district inspectors, engineers and specific LH keepers • Oversight of light-vessels of Light-House Service • Establishment of detailed rules of operation for light-vessels and light-houses and creation of rules manual. “The Light-Houses of the United States” Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Dec 1873 – May 1874 … “The Light-house Board carries on and provides for an infinite number of details, many of them petty, but none unimportant.” “The Light-Houses of the United States” Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Dec 1873 – May 1874 “There is a printed book of 152 pages specially devoted to instructions and directions to light-keepers.
    [Show full text]
  • Maumee AOC Habitat Restoration
    Maumee AOC Habitat Restoration The Maumee River habitat restoration project at Penn 7 will improve habitat for fish and wildlife by creating coastal wetlands and forested upland along the Maumee River. Project Location and 30% Design Concept Map • Northern Shoreline of the Maumee River in Toledo, Ohio Project Highlights Create 8.5 acres of emergent coastal wetland and 6.7 acres of submerged coastal wetland Improve roughly 59 acres of habitat including adjacent upland areas Control invasive plant species and plant native vegetation Install water control and fish habitat connectivity structures Funding is provided by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - Great Lakes Commission (GLC) Regional Partnership The City of Toledo is implementing this project with assistance from their consultant, Hull and Associates Environmental Benefits Economic Benefits Community Benefits New fish and wildlife habitat Regional benefits to Downtown nature space Improved hydrologic eco-tourism, birding Improved water quality and connectivity and fishing ecosystem health Background of the Area of Concern (AOC) Located in Northwest Ohio, the Maumee AOC is comprised of 787 square miles that includes approximately the lower 23 miles of the Maumee River downstream to Maumee Bay, as well as other waterways within Lucas, Ottawa and Wood counties that drain to Lake Erie, such as Swan Creek, Ottawa River (Ten Mile Creek), Grassy Creek, Duck Creek, Otter Creek, Cedar Creek, Crane Creek, Turtle Creek, Packer Creek, and the Toussaint River. In 1987 the Maumee AOC River was designated as an AOC under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ADAMS 242 - XXX D ELLISON MEMORIAL PARK VILLAGE OF PEEBLES $74,000.00 C 3/7/1973 12/31/1975 2 ADAMS County Total: $74,000.00 County Count: 1 ALLEN 580 - XXX A STRAYER WOODS ACQUISITION JOHNNY APPLESEED METRO PARK DIST. $111,500.00 C 12/6/1977 12/31/1979 4 819 - XXX D OTTAWA RIVER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LIMA $45,045.00 C 3/21/1980 12/31/1984 4 913 - XXX D VILLAGE PARK VILLAGE OF SPENCERVILLE $11,265.00 C 7/28/1981 12/31/1986 4 ALLEN County Total: $167,810.00 County Count: 3 ASHLAND 93 - XXX D MOHICAN STATE PARK SWIMMING POOL DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES $102,831.30 C 4/23/1971 6/30/1972 16 463 - XXX D MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CITY OF ASHLAND $144,615.70 C 4/7/1976 12/31/1978 16 573 - XXX A BROOKSIDE PARK EXPANSION CITY OF ASHLAND $45,325.00 C 11/10/1977 12/31/1979 16 742 - XXX D LEWIS MEMORIAL TENNIS COURTS VILLAGE OF JEROMESVILLE $4,715.00 C 5/2/1979 12/31/1983 16 807 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK CITY OF ASHLAND $200,300.00 C 7/14/1980 12/31/1985 16 953 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK III CITY OF ASHLAND $269,669.98 C 6/14/1983 12/31/1988 16 1159 - XXX D BROOKSIDE WEST CITY OF ASHLAND $154,500.00 C 7/11/1990 12/31/1995 16 ASHLAND County Total: $921,956.98 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusually Large Loads in 2007 from the Maumee and Sandusky Rivers, Tributaries to Lake Erie
    point sources of pollution, the control of erosion and sediment transport to Lake Erie doi:10.2489/jswc.65.6.450 became important because much of the non- point phosphorus was bound to sediment (IJC 1978). In this context, more detailed and accurate knowledge of tributary loads Unusually large loads in 2007 from the of sediment, phosphorus, and other nutrients became a matter of concern. Maumee and Sandusky Rivers, tributaries The National Center for Water Quality Research (NCWQR) at Heidelberg to Lake Erie University began monitoring sediment and nutrients in the major US tributaries to Lake R.P. Richards, D.B. Baker, J.P. Crumrine, and A.M. Stearns Erie in 1975, with some records extend- ing back as far as the late 1960s. The past Abstract: During water year 2007 (October 1, 2006, through September 30, 2007), the thirty years have seen improvements in some Maumee River and Sandusky River in northern Ohio transported the largest, or nearly aspects of water quality in these tributar- Copyright © 2010 Soil and Water Conservation Society. All rights reserved. the largest, loads of several water quality constituents that have been observed in 33 years of ies (reductions in suspended solids [SS] and Journal of Soil and Water Conservation monitoring. Discharge, total phosphorus, dissolved reactive phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitro- particulate phosphorus [PP] [Richards et gen, and chloride all recorded 33-year maximum loads, while the loads for nitrate ranked al. 2008, 2009]), as well as some worsening 5th (Sandusky) and 8th (Maumee) out of 33. Loads of particulate phosphorus ranked 2nd trends (increasing dissolved reactive phos- (Sandusky) and 4th (Maumee), and those for suspended solids ranked 10th (Sandusky) and phorus [DRP] [Richards 2006]).
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species
    Gap Analysis Program Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species By S. Alex. Covert, Stephanie P. Kula, and Laura A. Simonson Open-File Report 2006–1385 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Covert, S.A., Kula, S.P., and Simonson, L.A., 2007, Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis: An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1385, 509 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Executive Summary...........................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations 2021-2022
    FISHING REGULATIONS OHIO 2021-2022 Effective MARCH 1, 2021 to FEBRUARY 28, 2022 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE wildohio.gov OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE The Division of Wildlife’s mission is to conserve and improve fish and wildlife resources and their habitats for sustainable use and appreciation by all. VISIT US ON THE WEB WILDOHIO.GOV FOR GENERAL INFORMATION 1-800-WILDLIFE (1-800-945-3543) LAKE ERIE FISHING FORECAST 1-888-HOOKFISH (1-888-466-5347) OF TO REPORT WILDLIFE VIOLATIONS DIVISION WILDLIFE CALL OR TEXT DISTRICT OFFICES 1-800-POACHER WILDLIFE DISTRICT ONE (1-800-762-2437) 1500 Dublin Road **AVAILABLE 24 HOURS** Columbus, OH 43215 1-800-WILDLIFE FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA WILDLIFE DISTRICT TWO 952 Lima Avenue Like us on Facebook Findlay, OH 45840 facebook.com/ohiodivisionofwildlife 1-800-WILDLIFE Like us on Facebook WILDLIFE DISTRICT THREE facebook.com/yourwildohioangler 912 Portage Lakes Drive Akron, OH 44319 Follow us on Twitter 1-800-WILDLIFE twitter.com/OhioDivWildlife WILDLIFE DISTRICT FOUR 360 E. State Street Athens, OH 45701 1-800-WILDLIFE WILDLIFE DISTRICT FIVE 1076 Old Springfield Pike Xenia, OH 45385 1-800-WILDLIFE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The Ohio Division of Wildlife offers equal opportunity regardless of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex (in education programs). If you believe GOVERNOR, STATE OF OHIO you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, you should contact: MIKE DEWINE The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Diversity & Civil Rights Programs-External Programs, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT 4040 N. Fairfax Dr., Suite 130, Arlington, VA 22203 OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ohio Department of Natural Resources, EEO Office MARY C.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo-Magazine-Fall-Fly-Fishing.Pdf
    TOLEDO MAGAZINE toledoBlade.com THE BLADE, TOLEDO, OHIO SUNDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2011 SECTION B, PAGE 6 THE OUTDOORS PAGE !7BB<BO<?I>?D= on the scenic Little Beaver Creek BLADE WATERCOLOR/JEFF BASTING PHOTOS BY MIKE MAINHART By STEVE POLLICK and JEFF BASTING t is time well-spent, flycasting bald eagle, an osprey, and, around for smallmouth bass on a re- the next bend, two deer, wading, Imote, wild, scenic stream on one of them a nice buck. This is a a sunny autumn day. place to lose track of time. The surprising thing is that here It is not easy wading over the cob- on Little Beaver Creek, it is so wild, ble for hours, but too soon the sun- so quiet, so remote that you wonder shot shadows are getting long and whether you actually are in Ohio. you realize that you are a steady, 45- Hard by the Pennsylvania line on minute hike from the Jeep, follow- the eastern border of Ohio, 36 miles ing an old mule towpath. Tracing it of the Little Beaver system comprise is a godsend when you are hungry a state and national wild and scenic and tired and want to “get back.” river. A 2,722-acre state park named The raised path was used in the for the creek is a good place for an 1830s and 1840s by muleskinners outing, the bridges at its upper and prodding teams that pulled tow- lower ends making nice bookends boats through the 90 locks of the 73- for a day astream. mile-long Sandy and Beaver Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballville Dam Project, Sandusky County, Ohio
    Ballville Dam Project, Sandusky County, Ohio DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Midwest Region Regional Office - Fisheries 5600 American Boulevard West Bloomington, MN 55437 February 2016 a. Title: Ballville Dam Project, Sandusky County, Ohio b. Subject: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement c. Lead Agency: United States Fish and Wildlife Service d. Abstract: Ballville Dam is currently a complete barrier to upstream fish passage and impedes hydrologic processes. The purpose for the issuance of federal funds and preparation of this Draft SEIS are to restore natural hydrological processes over a 40-mile stretch of the Sandusky River, re-open fish passage to 22 miles of new habitat, restore flow conditions for fish access to new habitat above the impoundment, and improve overall conditions for native fish communities in the Sandusky River system both upstream and downstream of the Ballville Dam, restoring self- sustaining fish resources. On October 21, 2011, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a notice of intent to prepare a Draft EIS and request for comments in the Federal Register. The comment period for this notice ended on November 21, 2011 with many comments provided. On January 24, 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published the Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (FR 79 4354), opening a 60 day public comment period. Comments were received from 29 individuals, organizations, and agencies, addressing a number of topics. On August 1, 2014, the Service issued the FEIS in the Federal Register (FR 79 44856) opening a 30-day comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio
    University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program 4-2016 The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Sarah Anne Stalder University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the Biology Commons eCommons Citation Stalder, Sarah Anne, "The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio" (2016). Honors Theses. 133. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/133 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Honors Thesis Sarah Anne Stalder Department: Biology Advisor: Jeffrey Kavanaugh, Ph.D. April 2016 The Effects of Low Dam Removal and Kayak Run Installation on the Biodiversity of Fish and Macroinvertebrates in the Great Miami River in Downtown Dayton, Ohio Honors Thesis Sarah Anne Stalder Department: Biology Advisor: Jeffrey Kavanaugh, Ph.D. April 2016 Abstract Five Rivers Metroparks and the Miami Conservancy District have made plans to remove the upper portion of the Monument Avenue low-head dam in downtown Dayton due to the hazard it poses for recreation on the river and its negative impact on water quality and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]