DOCSLIB.ORG

Ductile Shearing to Brittle Thrusting Along the Nepal Himalaya: Linking Miocene Channel flow and Critical Wedge Tectonics to 25Th April 2015 Gorkha Earthquake

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ductile Shearing to Brittle Thrusting Along the Nepal Himalaya: Linking Miocene Channel flow and Critical Wedge Tectonics to 25Th April 2015 Gorkha Earthquake Tectonophysics 714–715 (2017) 117–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Ductile shearing to brittle thrusting along the Nepal Himalaya: Linking Miocene channel flow and critical wedge tectonics to 25th April 2015 Gorkha earthquake Mike Searle a,⁎, Jean-Philippe Avouac b, John Elliott a,1, Brendan Dyck a a Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK b Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA article info abstract Article history: The 25th April 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal ruptured the Main Himalayan thrust (MHT) for Received 29 January 2016 ~140 km east-west and ~50 km across strike. The earthquake nucleated at a depth of ~15–18 km approximating Received in revised form 1 August 2016 to the brittle-ductile transition and propagated east along the MHT but did not rupture to the surface, leaving half Accepted 6 August 2016 of the fault extent still locked beneath the Siwalik hills. Coseismic slip shows that motion is confined to the ramp- Available online 8 August 2016 flat geometry of the MHT and there was no out-of-sequence movement along the Main Central Thrust (MCT). Keywords: Below 20 km depth, the MHT is a creeping, aseismic ductile shear zone. Cumulated deformation over geological Gorkha earthquake time has exhumed the deeper part of the Himalayan orogen which is now exposed in the Greater Himalaya Nepal revealing a tectonic history quite different from presently active tectonics. There, early Miocene structures, in- Himalaya cluding the MCT, are almost entirely ductile, with deformation occurring at temperatures higher than ~400 °C, Channel flow and were active between ~22–16 Ma. Kyanite and sillimanite-grade gneisses and migmatites approximately Critical wedge 5–20 km thick in the core of the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) together with leucogranite intrusions along the top of the GHS were extruded southward between ~22–15 Ma, concomitant with ages of partial melt- ing. Thermobarometric constraints show that ductile extrusion of the GHS during the Miocene occurred at muscovite-dehydration temperatures ~650-775 °C, and thus brittle thrusting and critical taper models for GHS deformation are unrealistic. As partial melting and channel flow ceased at ~15 Ma, brittle thrusting and under- plating associated with duplex formation occurred along the Lesser Himalaya passively uplifting the GHS. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction metamorphic isograds are inverted along the Main Central Thrust zone (MCT) and along the upper contact isograds are right way-up be- The Himalayan orogen is commonly interpreted as a crustal scale neath the South Tibetan Detachment (STD), an enigmatic low-angle, wedge, analogous to a critical taper (Yin and Harrison, 2000; Avouac, north-dipping normal fault (e.g. Burg and Chen, 1984; Searle, 2010, 2015; Bollinger et al., 2006), that formed as units detached from the 2015; Law et al., 2011; Cottle et al., 2015a). The GHS was exhumed in underthrusting Indian plate were accreted to the southern margin of the Oligocene - Miocene as a result of ductile shearing along the coeval Tibet since the India-Asia collision started about 50 Ma ago (Figs. 1,2). MCT and STD ductile shear zones, by a process known as channel flow, The upper crust of the Himalaya is represented by the so-called Tethyan the ductile extrusion of a mid-crustal layer of partially molten rocks (e.g. Himalaya, a sequence of Neo-Proterozoic to Cenozoic mainly sedimen- Beaumont et al., 2001; Grujic et al., 2002; Searle et al., 2003, 2010; Godin tary rocks showing intense folding and thrusting, crustal shortening et al., 2006; Law et al., 2011; Cottle et al., 2015a, 2015b). The southern- and thickening, but generally not metamorphosed (Corfield and most and structurally lower part of the Himalaya is the Lesser Himalaya, Searle, 2000). The middle crust is the Greater Himalayan Sequence comprising a series of south-vergent thrust sheets emplacing the (GHS) of highly metamorphosed and partially melted gneisses, Himalaya over the Siwalik foreland basin sediments along the Main migmatites and leucogranites all of which show Cenozoic metamor- Boundary Thrust (MBT). phism up to kyanite and sillimanite grade. Along the base of the GHS, This paper attempts to link the deformation in the Greater Himalayan hinterland (Early Eocene – Early Miocene metamorphism and deforma- tion) to the Lesser Himalaya foreland critical wedge (mid-Miocene – Recent) to the active thrusting as exemplified by the 25th April 2015 ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Searle). Gorkha earthquake rupture. The geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust 1 Now at: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS29JT, UK. (MHT), the basal detachment that ruptured during the 25th April 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.08.003 0040-1951/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 118 M. Searle et al. / Tectonophysics 714–715 (2017) 117–124 84˚ 85˚ 86˚ 87˚ Tethyan Himalaya STD STD Manaslu MCT/CT Shisha Pangma Langtang Pokhara Cho Oyu 28˚Lesser Gorkha MCT/MT Everest Himalaya Greater Himalaya MBT Kathmandu Kathmandu Klippe Siwalik Hills Lukla MFT MCT/CT Phaplu MCT/RT 27˚ Tethyan Himalaya MFT STD - South Tibetan Detachment MBT Greater Himalaya MCT/CT - Chomrong Thrust Dunche Schist MCT/MT - Munsiari/Mahabharak Thrust MCT/RT - Ramgarh Thrust Lesser Himalaya MBT - Main Boundary Thrust Cities Line of Section Siwalik Group MFT - Main Frontal Thrust Mountains Fig. 2 Fig. 1. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the central Nepal Himalaya, showing main structures metamorphic grade across the Langtang – Ganesh Himalaya. Greater Himalayan Sequence (dark green) includes amphibolite facies gneisses and schists, migmatites and leucogranites. ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA. Gorkha earthquake (Avouac et al., 2015; Elliott et al., 2016), is critical to (e.g. Beaumont et al., 2001; Grujic et al., 2002; Searle et al., 2003, the interpretation of the kinematic history the Himalaya. 2006, 2010; Jessup et al., 2006; Godin et al., 2006; Streule et al., 2010) Two major conflicts in Himalayan tectonics involve: (1) the discus- and proponents of the critical wedge taper model (e.g. DeCelles et al., sion between proponents of Channel Flow along the Greater Himalaya 2001; Kohn et al., 2004; Kohn, 2008; Webb et al., 2011; He et al., S Ganesh TIBET N STD Chitwan Himal MCT Tethyan hills Kathmandu sill sediments MT MT ky sill MFT MDT MBT klippe Gsz st STD 0 D 0 LESSER hunc Leucogranite SIWALIKS GT he sc hist GREATER Palaeozoic RT locked MHT HIMALAYA HIMALAYA 10 granite sills 10 Proterozoic MCT earthquake rupture Gneisses Archaean basement Depth (km) 20 MHT 20 V.E 1x 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 85.068E 85.169E 85.269E 85.373E 85.477E 85.577E 85.682E 85.788E 85.840E 27.125N 27.321N 27.524N 27.726N 27.925N 28.123N 28.320N 28.125N 28.615N Distance Along Profile NNE-SSW (km) Metamorphic Key Unmetamorphosed Tethyan Himalaya STD STD - South Tibetan Detachment 20-15 Ma Way-up metamorphic field gradient Leucogranites MCT - Main Central Thrust 20-15 Ma sill Sillimanite isograd Migmatites, sills MT - Munsiari / Mahabharat Thrust 20-15 Ma ky kyanite isograd Amphibolite facies GHS RT - Ramgarth Thrust 15-10 Ma st staurolite isograd MCT zone Greenschist facies MBT - Main Boundary Thrust 7- 0 Ma GSZ Galchi shear zone MDT - Main Dun Thrust Active GT Gorkha blind thrust Low-grade Lesser Himalaya MBT MFT - Main Frontal Thrust Active MHT Main Himalayan Thrust Siwalik sediments Fig. 2. Geological cross-section of the Langtang – Kathmandu Himalaya showing major structural units, metamorphic grade, thrust faults and extent of the rupture during the 25th April 2015 Gorkha earthquake. M. Searle et al. / Tectonophysics 714–715 (2017) 117–124 119 2015; Yu et al., 2015)(Fig. 3), and (2) whether ‘out-of sequence’ thrust- of active thrusts but these, although fairly common (Morley, 1988), ing has occurred in the past along the Main Central Thrust (e.g. Wobus are not as important as in-sequence (‘piggy-back’) thrusts. et al., 2003, 2005) or not (e.g., Lavé and Avouac, 2001; Bollinger et al., At the leading edge of a fold-thrust belt a ‘critical taper’ (e.g., Elliott, 2006; Herman et al., 2010; Nadin and Martin, 2012). 1976; Davis et al., 1983; Dahlen et al., 1984; Dahlen, 1990) develops The Langtang – Kathmandu profile across the Nepal Himalaya where material is continually added to the wedge by frontal accretion, (Figs. 1,2) is a well-exposed and well-studied transect where the ductile or underplating (Fig. 3). The shape of the critical wedge is governed and brittle structures have been mapped and there are P-T-t-D data (e.g. by various factors including the composition and density of the Reddy et al., 1993; Kohn, 2008). This was the area affected by the recent deforming rock, the geometry and slope of the basal detachment, fric- 25th April 2015 Gorkha earthquake and interpretation of the deep tional stress along the basal thrust fault, convergence rate, erosion structure of the MHT during this earthquake (Avouac et al., 2015; rate, and the nature of the backstop (e.g. Dahlen, 1984; Dahlen and Elliott et al., 2016) gives us a unique opportunity to correlate the geolog- Suppe, 1988; Malavieille, 2010). Whereas the pro-wedge side accom- ical history of older, deeper, hotter GHS rocks to Late Cenozoic brittle modates most of the crustal shortening, over-thickened wedges fre- thrust faulting beneath the Lesser Himalaya, and active thrust faulting quently result in backthrusts along the retro-wedge side. These along the MHT as deduced from the 25th April 2015 Gorkha earthquake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterizing the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with Receiver Function CCP Stacking
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 367 (2013) 15–27 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Characterizing the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking Warren B. Caldwell a,n, Simon L. Klemperer a, Jesse F. Lawrence a, Shyam S. Rai b, Ashish c a Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States b National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India c CSIR Centre for Mathematical Modeling and Computer Simulation, NAL Belur, Bangalore, India article info abstract Article history: We use common conversion point (CCP) stacking of Ps receiver functions to image the crustal structure Received 20 November 2012 and Moho of the Garhwal Himalaya of India. Our seismic array of 21 broadband seismometers spanned Received in revised form the Himalayan thrust wedge at 79–801E, between the Main Frontal Thrust and the South Tibet 10 February 2013 Detachment, in 2005–2006. Our CCP image shows the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), the detachment Accepted 11 February 2013 at the base of the Himalayan thrust wedge, with a flat-ramp-flat geometry. Seismic impedance Editor: T.M. Harrison contrasts inferred from geologic cross-sections in Garhwal imply a negative impedance contrast (velocity decreasing downward) for the upper flat, located beneath the Lower Himalaya, and a positive Keywords: impedance contrast (velocity increasing downward) for the ramp, located beneath the surface trace of Himalaya the Munsiari Thrust (or MCT-I). At the lower flat, located beneath the Higher Himalaya, spatially India coincident measurements of very high electrical conductivities require the presence of free fluids, and Garhwal receiver functions we infer a negative impedance contrast on the MHT caused by ponding of these fluids beneath the CCP stacking detachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Contractional Tectonics: Investigations of Ongoing Construction of The
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Contractional Tectonics: Investigations of Ongoing Construction of the Himalaya Fold-thrust Belt and the Trishear Model of Fault-propagation Folding Hongjiao Yu Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Yu, Hongjiao, "Contractional Tectonics: Investigations of Ongoing Construction of the Himalaya Fold-thrust Belt and the Trishear Model of Fault-propagation Folding" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2683. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2683 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. CONTRACTIONAL TECTONICS: INVESTIGATIONS OF ONGOING CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIMALAYAN FOLD-THRUST BELT AND THE TRISHEAR MODEL OF FAULT-PROPAGATION FOLDING A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geology and Geophysics by Hongjiao Yu B.S., China University of Petroleum, 2006 M.S., Peking University, 2009 August 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have had a wonderful five-year adventure in the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Louisiana State University. I owe a lot of gratitude to many people and I would not have been able to complete my PhD research without the support and help from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalayan Megathrust Geometry and Relation to Topography Revealed by the Gorkha Earthquake J
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 11 JANUARY 2016 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2623 Himalayan megathrust geometry and relation to topography revealed by the Gorkha earthquake J. R. Elliott1*, R. Jolivet2†, P. J. González3, J.-P. Avouac2,4, J. Hollingsworth5, M. P. Searle6 and V. L. Stevens4 The Himalayan mountain range has been the locus of some of the largest continental earthquakes, including the 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake. Competing hypotheses suggest that Himalayan topography is sustained and plate convergence is accommodated either predominantly on the main plate boundary fault, or more broadly across multiple smaller thrust faults. Here we use geodetic measurements of surface displacement to show that the Gorkha earthquake ruptured the Main Himalayan Thrust fault. The earthquake generated about 1 m of uplift in the Kathmandu Basin, yet caused the high Himalaya farther north to subside by about 0.6 m. We use the geodetic data, combined with geologic, geomorphological and geophysical analyses, to constrain the geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Kathmandu area. Structural analyses together with interseismic and coseismic displacements are best explained by a steep, shallow thrust fault flattening at depth between 5 and 15 km and connecting to a mid-crustal, steeper thrust. We suggest that present-day convergence across the Himalaya is mostly accommodated by this fault—no significant motion on smaller thrust faults is required. Furthermore, given that the Gorkha earthquake caused the high Himalayan mountains to subside and that our fault geometry explains measured interseismic displacements, we propose that growth of Himalayan topography may largely occur during the ongoing post- seismic phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2005, Mw 7.6 Kashmir Earthquake
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 249 (2006) 514–528 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The 2005, Mw 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: Sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis ⁎ Jean-Philippe Avouac , Francois Ayoub, Sebastien Leprince, Ozgun Konca, Don V. Helmberger Tectonic Observatory, Geology and Planetary Science Division, Caltech Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Received 6 April 2006; received in revised form 16 June 2006; accepted 16 June 2006 Available online 17 August 2006 Editor: R.D. van der Hilst Abstract We analyze the Mw7.6 Kashmir earthquake of October 8, 2005, using sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images to measure ground deformation, and modeling seismic waveforms. The surface rupture is continuous over a distance of 75 km and cuts across the Hazara syntaxis reactivating the Tanda and the Muzaffarabad faults. North of Muzaffarabad the surface rupture coincides approximately with the MBT, on the southwestern flank of the syntaxis, although the two faults have opposite dip angles. The rupture terminates abruptly at the hairpin turn of the MBT showing a strong structural control. The fault offset is 4 m on average and peaks to 7 m northwest of Muzaffarabad. The rupture lasted about 25 s and propagated updip and bi-laterally by ∼2 km/s, with a rise time of 2–5 s. The shallowness and compactness of the rupture, both in time and space, provide an explanation for the intensity of destructions. This kind of analysis could be achieved as soon as a post-earthquake image is available, and would provide key information for early assessment of damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Tectono-Stratigraphic Architecture, Structural Geometry, and Kinematic Evolution of the Himalayan Fold-Thrust Belt, Kumaun, Northwest India
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Geosciences Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Geosciences 8-1-2019 Examining the Tectono-Stratigraphic Architecture, Structural Geometry, and Kinematic Evolution of the Himalayan Fold-Thrust Belt, Kumaun, Northwest India Subhadip Mandal University of Alabama Delores M. Robinson University of Alabama Matthew J. Kohn Boise State University, [email protected] Subodha Khanal Georgia Department of Transportation Oindrila Das University of Alabama Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/geo_facpubs Part of the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Publication Information Mandal, Subhadip; Robinson, Delores M.; Kohn, Matthew J.; Khanal, Subodha; and Das, Oindrila. (2019). "Examining the Tectono-Stratigraphic Architecture, Structural Geometry, and Kinematic Evolution of the Himalayan Fold-Thrust Belt, Kumaun, Northwest India". Lithosphere, 11(4), 414-435. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1130/L1050.1 RESEARCH Examining the tectono-stratigraphic architecture, structural geometry, and kinematic evolution of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, Kumaun, northwest India Subhadip Mandal1,*, Delores M. Robinson1, Matthew J. Kohn2, Subodha Khanal3, and Oindrila Das1 1DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, CENTER FOR SEDIMENTARY BASIN STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, BEVILL BUILDING, TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 35487, USA 2DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES, BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY, 1910 UNIVERSITY DRIVE, BOISE, IDAHO 83725, USA 3GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 600 WEST PEACHTREE STREET NORTHWEST,
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic and Tectonic Discontinuities in Western Nepal
    Lithosphere, published online on 17 June 2015 as doi:10.1130/L444.1 Along-strike changes in Himalayan thrust geometry: Topographic and tectonic discontinuities in western Nepal Jonathan E. Harvey1,*, Douglas W. Burbank1, and Bodo Bookhagen2 1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA–SANTA BARBARA, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93106, USA 2INSTITUTE OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM, 14476 POTSDAM-GOLM, GERMANY ABSTRACT Geodetic and seismologic studies support a tectonic model for the central Himalaya wherein ~2 cm/yr of Indo-Asian convergence is accom- modated along the primary décollement under the range, the Main Himalayan thrust. A steeper midcrustal ramp in the Main Himalayan thrust is commonly invoked as driving rapid rock uplift along a range-parallel band in the Greater Himalaya. This tectonic model, developed primarily from studies in central Nepal, is commonly assumed to project along strike with little lateral variation in Main Himalayan thrust geometry or associated rock uplift patterns. Here, we synthesize multiple lines of evidence for a major discontinuity in the Main Himalayan thrust in western Nepal. Analysis of topography and seismicity indicates that west of ~82.5°E, the single band of steep topography and seismicity along the Main Himalayan thrust ramp in central Nepal bifurcates around a high-elevation, low-relief landscape, resulting in a two-step topographic front along an ~150 km segment of the central Himalaya. Although multiple models could explain this bifurcation, the full suite of data appears to be most consistent with a northward bend to the Main Himalayan thrust ramp and activation of a young duplex horse to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Strike-Slip Faults and an Outer Frontal Thrust in the Himalayan Foreland Basin
    Active strike-slip faults and an outer frontal thrust in the Himalayan foreland basin Michael J. Duvalla, John W. F. Waldrona,1, Laurent Godinb, and Yani Najmanc aDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2E3, Canada; bDepartment of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston ON K7L 3N6, Canada; and cLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LA1 4YQ Lancaster, United Kingdom Edited by Lisa Tauxe, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved June 11, 2020 (received for review February 2, 2020) The Himalayan foreland basin formed by flexure of the Indian Plate unconformably on Proterozoic mobile belts, sedimentary basins, below the advancing orogen. Motion on major thrusts within the and an Archean craton, exposed along the southern edge of the orogen has resulted in damaging historical seismicity, whereas south basin. The stratigraphy of the basin is known from drilling and of the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT), the foreland basin is typically from outcrop in the sub-Himalaya and Lesser Himalaya (22). portrayed as undeformed. Using two-dimensional seismic reflection The basin fill is divided by an Oligocene disconformity in the sub- data from eastern Nepal, we present evidence of recent deformation Himalaya (23, 24), below which a thin (>90 m) Paleogene suc- propagating >37 km south of the MFT. A system of tear faults at a cession is dominated by marine mudstone (25). The overlying high angle to the orogen is spatially localized above the Munger- Miocene to Quaternary rocks are fluvial deposits that filled the Saharsa basement ridge. A blind thrust fault is interpreted in the subsiding basin (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Structure of the Bhutanese Himalaya: New Insights from a Gravity Analysis in Western and Central Bhutan
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Spring 2018 Crustal Structure of the Bhutanese Himalaya: New Insights from a Gravity Analysis in Western and Central Bhutan Kinzang Duba Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Recommended Citation Duba, Kinzang, "Crustal Structure of the Bhutanese Himalaya: New Insights from a Gravity Analysis in Western and Central Bhutan" (2018). MSU Graduate Theses. 3240. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3240 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRUSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE BHUTANESE HIMALAYA: NEW INSIGHTS FROM A GRAVTITY ANALYSIS IN WESTERN AND CENTRAL BHUTAN A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial
    [Show full text]
  • Active Structures of the Himalayan-Tibetan Orogen and Their Relationships to Earthquake Distribution, Contemporary Strain fi Eld, and Cenozoic Volcanism
    Active structures of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and their relationships to earthquake distribution, contemporary strain fi eld, and Cenozoic volcanism Michael Taylor Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1735 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA An Yin Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA ABSTRACT used to correlate surface geology with geo- earthquake distributions, and Cenozoic volca- physical properties such as seismic veloc- nism. The main fi ndings of this study include the We have compiled the distribution of ity variations and shear wave-splitting data following: (1) Tibetan earthquakes with mag- active faults and folds in the Himalayan- across the Himalaya and Tibet. nitudes >5 correlate well with surface faults; Tibetan orogen and its immediate surround- (2) the decadal strain-rate fi elds correlate well ing regions into a web-based digital map. The INTRODUCTION with the kinematics and rates of active faults; main product of this study is a compilation and (3) Tibetan Neogene–Quaternary volcanism of active structures that came from those The Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the is controlled by major strike-slip faults along documented in the literature and from our Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and its surround- the plateau margins but has no relationship with own interpretations based on satellite images ing regions is expressed by the development of active faults in the plateau interior. Our com- and digital topographic data. Our digital tec- complex fault systems, folds, and widespread piled active structures are far from being com- tonic map allows a comparison between the volcanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Fault Plane Solutions and Stress Drop Using Local Broadband Network Data: the 2011 Sikkim Himalaya Earthquake of Mw 6.9 and Its Aftershocks
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 61, 1, SE107, 2018; DOI: 10.4401/ag-7367 Study of fault plane solutions and stress drop using local broadband network data: the 2011 Sikkim Himalaya earthquake of Mw 6.9 and its aftershocks Santanu Baruah 1,2, *, Sebastiano D’Amico 3, Sowrav Saikia 4, J. L. Gautam 4, R. K. Mrinalinee Devi 1, Goutam Kashyap Boruah 1, Antara Sharma 1,2 , Mohamed F Abdelwahed 5,6 1 Geosciences & Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science & Technology (NEIST), India 2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-NEIST Campus, India 3. Dept. of Geosciences, University of Malta, Malta 4. National Center for Seismology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New-Delhi, India 5. Geohazards Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 6. National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Cairo, Egypt Article history Received January 27, 2017; accepted January 22, 2018. Subject classification: Sikkim Himalaya; Stress Drop; Seismic moment. ABSTRACT severe damages to property and also caused 60 casual - Fault plane solutions of the September 18, 2011 Sikkim Himalaya ties. This is the strongest instrumentally recorded earth - earthquake of Mw 6.9 and its four aftershocks (Mw>4.0) are studied quake in the Sikkim Himalaya during the last two by waveform inversion using the local broadband network data. The centuries [Pradhan et al. 2013]. The most significant sig - solutions show pure strike-slip mechanisms; one aftershock show thrust natures of the 2011 Sikkim earthquake are landslides faulting with strike-slip component. Strike-slip mechanisms indicate and landslide-induced loss of life as well as damage to predominant transverse tectonics in Sikkim, in the eastern Himalaya the economy and infrastructure due to which the max - region, unlike predominant thrust tectonics in the western Himalaya.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Model for the Main Central Thrust in Nepal
    Kinematic model for the Main Central thrust in Nepal D.M. Robinson* Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA P.G. DeCelles C.N. Garzione Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA O.N. Pearson Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA T.M. Harrison Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia E.J. Catlos School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA ABSTRACT thrust to ;4 kbar near the South Tibetan de- We present a kinematic model for the Himalayan thrust belt that satis®es structural tachment system. In the northern part of the and metamorphic data and explains recently reported late Miocene±Pliocene geochrono- Lesser Himalaya, the rocks have been meta- logic and thermochronologic ages from rocks in the Main Central thrust zone in central morphosed to upper greenschist facies, and Nepal. At its current exposure level, the Main Central thrust juxtaposes a hanging-wall metamorphic isograds in the footwall of the ¯at in Greater Himalayan rocks with a footwall ¯at in Lesser Himalayan rocks of the Main Central thrust are inverted, progressing Ramgarh thrust sheet, which is the roof thrust of a large Lesser Himalayan duplex. Se- from chlorite to garnet in a northward direc- quential emplacement of the Main Central (early Miocene) and Ramgarh (middle Mio- tion (e.g., Harrison et al., 1998). The kine- cene) thrust sheets was followed by insertion of thrust sheets within the Lesser Himalayan matic history of the thrust belt involved a gen- duplex and folding of the Main Central and Ramgarh thrusts during late Miocene± eral southward progression of main phases of Pliocene time.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling of Crustal Composition and Moho Depths and Their Implications Toward Seismogenesis in the Kumaon–Garhwal Himalaya Prantik Mandal*, D
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Modelling of crustal composition and Moho depths and their Implications toward seismogenesis in the Kumaon–Garhwal Himalaya Prantik Mandal*, D. Srinivas, G. Suresh & D. Srinagesh We image the lateral variations in the Moho depths and average crustal composition across the Kumaon–Garhwal (KG) Himalaya, through the H–K stacking of 1400 radial PRFs from 42 three- component broadband stations. The modelled Moho depth, average crustal Vp/Vs, and Poisson’s ratio estimates vary from 28.3 to 52.9 km, 1.59 to 2.13 and 0.17 to 0.36, respectively, in the KG Himalaya. We map three NS to NNE trending transverse zones of signifcant thinning of mafc crust, which are interspaced by zones of thickening of felsic crust. These mapped transverse zones bend toward the north to form a NE dipping zone of maximum changes in Moho depths, below the region between Munsiari and Vaikrita thrusts. The 1991 Mw6.6 Uttarakashi and 1999 Mw6.4 Chamoli earthquakes have occurred on the main Himalayan thrust (MHT), lying just above the mapped zone of maximum changes in Moho depths. Modelled large values of average crustal Vp/Vs (> 1.85) could be attributed to the high fuid (metamorphic fuids) pressure associated with the mid-crustal MHT. Additionally, the serpentinization of the lowermost crust resulted from the continent–continent Himalayan collision process could also contribute to the increase of the average crustal Vp/Vs ratio in the region. Te continent–continent collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates at ~ 55 Ma led to the formation of the Himalayan mountain chain and the Tibetan plateau, the largest continental plateau on the earth.
    [Show full text]