CDSG Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Delaware -Fort Miles Military Reservation FUDS
Fort Miles Military Reservation, DE FACT SHEET as of March 2, 2018 AUTHORIZATION: Defense Environmental Restoration Program TYPE OF PROJECT: Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) PROJECT PHASE: Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) Feasibility Study, Proposed Plan, Removal Actions, Design and Implementation of Land Use Controls CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: Senators Carper and Coons (DE) and Representative Blunt (DE-At Large) BACKGROUND: The former Fort Miles Military Reservation (FMMR), originally called Cape Henlopen Military Reservation, consisted of 2,011.25 acres located in Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware. The Post was formally named Fort Miles in 1938.The FMMR served primarily as a Coast Artillery Installation during World War I and World War II, providing for the defense of Delaware’s Atlantic coast line and protection of the entrance to Delaware Bay. In 1941, the Department of the Navy established the Harbor Entrance Control Post and placed mines in the channel leading to the Delaware Bay. A fortress with gun emplacements, ammunition dumps, and living quarters was constructed. Several small arms firing ranges and a 3.5-inch rocket range were also established. Approximately 60 percent of the site was used for military training. During World War II, Fort Miles was also used as a prisoner of war camp for German and Italian prisoners. Following World War II, the site remained an active Army installation and was used as a training post during the Korean War. The FMMR closed in 1958. In 1961, any remaining land was transferred to the Department of Navy, which was subsequently transferred to the State of Delaware in 1996. -
Remember Mid-April 1970, America Was Angry
EAaN rth Day TO Remember mid-April 1970, America was angry. The baby boomers had become cynical, mistrusting In parents, business, industry and Back in 1970, John Stenger government. This generation was especially disdainful of the so-called military-indus - and a band of students came to trial complex that President Dwight Eisenhower had warned about. The Vietnam War dragged on, filling the defense of Cape Henlopen’s the 6 o’clock news with death and destruction, and no end was in sight. The previous month, the Army had imperiled dunes charged 14 officers with suppressing the truth about the horrific My Lai massacre in Vietnam, where as many as 500 essentially unarmed civilians had been murdered by U.S. troops. The hopeful Apollo 13 moon mission had suffered an oxygen tank explosion a few days before, forcing its hasty retreat to Earth. The Cold War with the communist USSR was tense and dispiriting, and Paul McCartney had just announced the breakup of the Beatles. To many Americans, the future seemed dismal and hundreds of thousands had taken to the streets and college cam - puses to protest the nation’s various problems. Among those concerns was the environment. Decades of hellbent-for-leather industrial develop - ment with little regard for the land, oceans and air was taking an ever-greater toll. To a growing number of people, this threat trumped all others: If you can’t breathe the air, can’t eat the food, and can’t drink the water, little else mattered. Scientists and other con - cerned individuals were beginning to sound the alarm, and people were beginning to listen. -
Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms. -
CDSG Newsletter - Winter 2021 Page 2
CDSGThe Newsletter The Coast Defense Study Group, Inc. — Winter 2021 * * * * * CDSG Meeting and Tour Calendar Membership Minute Please advise Terry McGovern of any additions Quentin Schillare or changes at [email protected] As we move into the second month of 2021 the membership 2021 CDSG Special Tour of the Coast Defense Study Group has grown a bit. We now have August 21 - 29 and August 25 - September 3, 2021 403 individual members and 19 organizational members for a Sweden total of 422. This total includes 18 new members, including two Terry McGovern, [email protected] who have rejoined after a short break. It is unknown what impact the coronavirus has had on membership. Membership depends 2021 CDSG Conference on several variables. Some members join and renew to have access October 12 - 17, 2021 to our quarterly publications, others sign up to be eligible for a Charleston/Savannah conference or special tour, and still others with an interest in the Gary Alexander, [email protected] history of seacoast fortifications find us on the Internet or from a friend. Regardless, membership supports all CDSG activities. 2022 CDSG Conference Things are quiet now, but they will pick up in October with the March 30 - April 3, 2022 Charleston/Savannah conference followed six months later in late New Orleans March 2022 with our visit to New Orleans. Quentin Schillare, [email protected] * * * * * 2021 Nominations Committee for the 2023 CDSG Special Tour CDSG Board September Northern Poland Terry McGovern – Corporate Secretary Terry McGovern, [email protected] The CDSG Nominations Committee, Danny Malone, Tom Other Meetings and Tours Batha, and Alex Hall, are seeking board candidates for the full Board to consider by May 1, 2021. -
World War II Finding
A Guide to World War II Resources at the Delaware Public Archives Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Notes on Access ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Federal Records at the Delaware Public Archives ........................................................................................ 6 Governor’s Papers (RG 1302)....................................................................................................................... 8 State Council of Presidents and Executives ............................................................................................ 13 Delaware Department of State Records (RG 1325) .................................................................................... 15 Delaware Veterans Military Pay Commission (RG 1470) .......................................................................... 24 Delaware Department of Transportation (RG 1540) .................................................................................. 29 Delaware State Council of Defense (RG 1673) .......................................................................................... 29 Military Records (RG 1800) ....................................................................................................................... 33 Sussex County Levy Court (RG 4200) ...................................................................................................... -
Annual Enforcement & Compliance Report
Maryland Department of the Environment ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT & COMPLIANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Ben Grumbles Horacio Tablada Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Deputy Secretary TABLE OF CONTENTS Section One – REPORT BASIS AND SUMMARY INFORMATION 3 Statutory Authority and Scope 4 Organization of the Report 4 MDE Executive Summary 5 MDE Performance Measures – Executive Summary 6 Enforcement Workforce 6 Section 1-301(d) Penalty Summary 7 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2004 8 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2005 – 2010 9 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2011 – 2017 10 MDE Enforcement Actions Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2017 11 MDE Penalties Historical Annual Summary Chart FY 1998 - 2017 11 MDE’s Enforcement and Compliance Process and Services to Permittees 12 and Businesses The Enforcement and Compliance Process 12 Enforcement Process Flow Chart 13 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) 14 Contacts or Consultations with Businesses 15 Compliance Assistance 15 Consultations with Businesses 15 Section Two - ADMINISTRATION DETAILS 17 Measuring Enforcement and Compliance 18 Performance Measures Table Overview and Definitions 19 Enforcement and Compliance Performance Measures Table Format 23 Air and Radiation Administration (ARA) 25 ARA Executive Summary 26 ARA Performance Measures 27 Ambient Air Quality Control 28 Air Quality Complaints 34 Asbestos 38 Radiation Machines 42 Radioactive Materials Licensing and Compliance 46 Land -
Real Stories Baltimore County History
REAL STORIES FROM BALTIMORE COUNTY HISTORY Data Obtained hvJ the Teachers and Children of Baltimore County (Maryland) Schools IDustrated with drawings by 7th and 8th Grade Pupils Revised and Adapted by ISOBEL DAVIDSON, Supercisor of Primary Grades, Baltimore County School.s. ---0--- BALTIMORE WARWICK & YORK, INC. 1917. Copyrighted, 1917, by· WARWICK & YORK, INc. REAL STORIES FROM BALTIMORE COUNTY HISTORY CONTENTS Page A FOREWORD ················~···························~---························ . 1 I. ONCE UPON A TIME IN OUR., ~OMMUNITY 1. Neighborhood Changes ....... .-........................................ 5 2. Our Country Long ~,g-0................................................ 9 3. Indians of Marylat'lct: Susquehannoughs and Al- gonqu1ns ......................................... .. ......................... 10 4. Con1ing of the First White 1'Ian-Captain John Smith in the Chesapeake . .: ........................ ~............. 13 5. How Maryland Was Named ........................................ 16 II. ONCE UPON A TIME IN BALTIMORE COUNTY 1. The Changing Boundary Line...................................... 19 2. The Early Pioneers...................................................... 20 3. Colonial Times .............................................................. 22 4. County Seats: Old Baltimore, Foster's Neck, Joppa, Baltimore Town, Towson ........................................ 37 III. ONCE UPON A TIME IN BALTIMORE TowN ........................ 46 IV. ONcE UPON A TIME IN OuR TowN AND V1c1NITY 1. Green Spring. Valley-1743......................................... -
FORT Howard, Maryland History and Artifacts
Fort Howard History 1896 - 1940 • If you have old pictures, written documents or family history stories about Fort Howard and the soldiers who served there, the Friends of Fort Howard Park would love to see and record them. Please contact us at [email protected]. Developed by the Dundalk – Patapsco Neck Historical Society & Museum and Edgemere - Sparrows Point Recreation Council Fort Howard was built at North Point, where the Patapsco River flows into the Chesapeake Bay. North Point was historically important long before the fort was constructed.. NORTH POINT Old North Point Road was once an Indian trail leading down the “backbone of Patapsco Neck.” Captain John Smith In 1608, during his epic exploration of the Chesapeake Bay, Captain John Smith and his crew are thought to have entered Old Road Bay, just west of North Point. “They adorn themselves with copper beads and paintings. The women have their legs, hands, chests, and faces cunningly tattooed with beasts, and serpents wrought into their flesh with black dots. In each ear they have 3 great holes whereat they hang chains, bracelets or copper. Some of the men wear in those holes a small green and yellow snake, near half a yard in length which crawling and lapping itself about his neck oftentimes would kiss his lips. Others wear a dead rat tied by the tail, the whole skin of a hawk stuffed with the wings abroad or the hand of their enemy dried.” Captain John Smith describing the natives he met during his exploration of the Chesapeake in 1608. Colonial Ships Anchored At North Point In 1683 an Act was passed establishing “North Point” as a terminus for ships moving goods to or from eastern Baltimore County . -
Fiscal Year 2019 Budget
Fiscal Year 2019 DNREC Capital Improvements Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Working for Delaware • Investing in open space • Protecting critical infrastructure • Cleaning up and managing Delaware’s waterways • Improving outdoor recreational opportunities • Cleaning up abandoned industrial sites • Remediating/redeveloping brownfields • Helping communities mitigate and adapt to climate change and sea level rise • Increasing recycling Trap Pond State Park 3 Capital Budget History 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 $ Millions 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 GRB Recent Highlights • 2,124 children attended education programs at the National Estuarine Research Reserve • 88,980 overnight stays (camping and cabins) in state parks (up 19% and a new record) • 105,000 samples tested (groundwater, surface water, soil, sediment and biological samples tested for multiple parameters) • 664 home heating oil tanks removed or filled in place Cape Henlopen State Park Investing in Open Space • More than 103,300 acres of lands managed • 35 park and wildlife areas • 10 nature preserves • 2 National Estuarine Research Reserve locations • 124 conservation easements Blackbird Creek Reserve (DNERR) Protecting Critical Infrastructure • 2,000 miles of tax ditches • 42 state-owned dams • 619 structures on State Park lands, 80 on Fish & Wildlife lands • 65 freshwater ponds and marine fishing access areas • 244 miles of trails • More than 100 miles of roads Killens Pond State Park Managing Delaware’s Waterways -
Surviving American Seacoast Artillery Weapons February 2021
232 American Seacoast Defenses Surviving American Seacoast Artillery Weapons February 2021 Compiled: Lists in various CDSG publications prepared by C.L. Kimbell (1985), R.D. Zink (1989), T.C. McGovern (1992 and 1996) and Tom Batha (2014-16). General Note: This is an attempt to list surviving weapons (or the same model/type) that were used by the American armed forces, either in the U.S. and overseas, in a coast defense role in the “modern era” (1890 to 1950). Items to be included in this list must retain at least the whole gun/mortar/howitzer. Sur- viving weapons from earlier periods, muzzleloading cannon (rifled and smoothbore), field artillery (except for 155mm), mobile anti-aircraft guns, and British, Canadian, or Mexican coast artillery are excluded from this list, even if used in North America. In a few cases, weapons have been included because they represent weapons similar to those used for coast defense, and are sufficiently interesting to warrant inclusion. Every effort has been made to make this list as accurate as possible, but it will probably contain a number of er- rors and omissions. Corrections and additions can be sent to Tom Batha ([email protected]), Mark Berhow ([email protected]) or Terry McGovern ([email protected]) The list is arranged by caliber (largest to smallest). The first line contains data about the weapon: the quantity at the site, the caliber of weapon (inches or millimeters), the model, serial number, place of manu- facture, and carriage information, if known. The next lines contain information on where the weapon was previously located as coast defense weapon. -
Cultural Landscape Report for Fort Mchenry National Monument and Historic Shrine
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE SITE HISTORY, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY FORT M C H ENRY N ATIONAL M ONUMENT AND HISTORIC S HRINE Prepared by: Mark Davison, Historical Landscape Architect, Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation Eliot Foulds, Historical Landscape Architect, Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation August 2004 CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT FOR FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE The Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation promotes the preservation of significant landscapes through research, planning, stewardship, and education. The Center accomplishes its mission in collaboration with a network of partners including national parks, universities, government agencies and private nonprofit organizations. Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation 99 Warren Street Brookline, Massachusetts 02445 617.566.1689 www.nps.gov/frla/oclp.htm Publication Credits: Information in this report may be copied and used with the condition that credit be given to the authors, and the Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation. This report has been prepared for in-house use, and will not be made available for sale. Photographs and graphics may not be reproduced for re-use without the permission of the owners or repositories noted in the captions. Cover Photo: Fort McHenry and Patapsco River, looking east, by the authors, July 2003. NPS / FOMC - D62 August. 2004 ii CONTENTS LIST OF -
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
TOWN OF Slaughter Beach COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AUGUST 2018 TOWN OF SLAUGHTER BEACH Contents • TOWN, COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS ........................................................................................................ v • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ vi Chapter I BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The Authority to Plan ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Public Participation .............................................................................................................................. 1 A. Resilient Community Partnership (RCP) ............................................................................................... 1 B. Comprehensive Land Use Planning Committee ................................................................................... 4 1.3. Overview of the Community ................................................................................................................ 4 A. Location ................................................................................................................................................ 4 B. Community, History, and Characteristics ............................................................................................