DOCSLIB.ORG

CURRENT DRAFT Summary and Intro Template.Docx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CURRENT DRAFT Summary and Intro Template.Docx INL/MIS-16-38127-E Revision 1 DE-EE0007159 Updated Permitting Inventory May 2016 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/MIS-16-38127-E Revision 1 Updated Permitting Inventory John S. Irving, Idaho National Laboratory Robert K. Podgorney, Idaho National Laboratory May 2016 Snake River Geothermal Consortium Hosted by Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, Idaho www.snakerivergeothermal.org Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ v 1. SURFACE OWNERSHIP .................................................................................................................. 1 2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL CONDITIONS ................................................................ 3 2.1 Existing Environmental Activities ........................................................................................... 3 2.2 INL Environmental Assessment Summary .............................................................................. 3 2.3 Nearby Population Center Density ........................................................................................... 5 2.4 Nearby Wildlife Habitats (endangered species/habitat) ........................................................... 6 2.5 Nearby Scenic Vistas ............................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Nearby Areas of Critical Environmental Concern or Wilderness Areas .................................. 8 2.7 Nearby Wetlands or Scenic Waterways ................................................................................... 8 2.8 Nearby Native American Tribes .............................................................................................. 8 2.9 Potential for Landslides or Excessive Subsidence as a Result of Induced Seismic Activity..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.10 Existence of Historic Structures or Identified Cultural Resources in the Immediate Vicinity of the Project Area ................................................................................................... 11 2.11 Potential Issues Associated with the National Historic Preservation Act .............................. 11 2.12 Public Support ........................................................................................................................ 12 3. PERMITTING STATUS .................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 National Environmental Policy Act ....................................................................................... 12 3.2 Well Permitting ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Exploratory Permits ............................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Approved Well Permits .......................................................................................................... 13 3.5 Permits Pending Approval ..................................................................................................... 14 3.6 Issues of Concern ................................................................................................................... 14 3.7 Mineral Rights........................................................................................................................ 14 3.8 Lease Status............................................................................................................................ 14 4. WATER AVAILABILITY .............................................................................................................. 14 4.1 Water Availability Onsite ...................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Water Rights .......................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.1 Water Rights Included/Secured with Land/Lease Deal ............................................ 15 4.2.2 Other Local Water Demands for Agricultural or other Purpose ............................... 15 5. STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS ......................................................................................... 15 5.1 Solid Waste Disposal Standards............................................................................................. 15 5.1.1 Access and Limitations on Waste Disposal .............................................................. 15 5.1.2 Sanitary Wastewater Disposal .................................................................................. 15 iii 5.2 Noise Standards ...................................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Air Quality Standards ............................................................................................................. 15 5.4 Drinking Water and Aquatic Life Protection ......................................................................... 15 5.5 Compatible Land Use ............................................................................................................. 16 5.6 Acceptable Local Effects of Heat Rejection .......................................................................... 16 6. POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE ................................... 16 7. YEAR-ROUND ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................................. 16 8. WEATHER CONDITIONS AT THE INL SITE ............................................................................. 16 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 17 ATTACHMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURES Figure 1. Map showing the INL Site and GRRA in relation to southeast Idaho and surrounding features such as national parks, a national monument, an Indian reservation, and cities. ............ 1 Figure 2. INL Site map showing the GRRA in relationship to the INL boundary, facility areas, roadways, and surrounding landforms. ......................................................................................... 2 Figure 3. Map showing population surrounding the GRRA (adapted from previous INL studies). ............. 6 Figure 4. Map of the GRRA and project area (see inset) showing the Sage-Grouse Conservation Area and sage-grouse leks (classified as active following the 2015 breeding season) in relationship to power lines, roads, and nearby INL facilities, i.e., the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and Central Facilities Area (CFA). ..................................................................... 7 Figure 5. U.S. Highway 20 running through the GRRA near the project location (right of highway). ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 6. View of the project area (looking south from the U.S. Highway 20) showing typical topography and vegetation in the surrounding area. ................................................................... 10 Figure 7. View of the project area (looking north and west across U.S. Highway 20) showing typical topography and vegetation in the surrounding area. ....................................................... 11 TABLES Table 1. Summary of three recent EAs at INL.............................................................................................. 3 iv ACRONYMS BLM Bureau of Land Management DOE U.S. Department of Energy DOE-ID Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office CRMP Cultural Resource Management Plan EA environmental assessment FONSI finding of no significant impact FORGE Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy GRRA Geothermal Resource Research Area IDWR Idaho Department Water Resources INL Idaho National Laboratory NGO non-governmental organization SHPO State Historic Preservation Office SOX Stand-Off Experiment SRGC Snake River Geothermal Consortium v vi Updated Permitting Inventory 1. SURFACE OWNERSHIP The site for the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) will be located within the boundaries of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Estimated 100-Year Peak Flows and Flow Volumes in the Big Lost River and Birch Creek at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho
    Estimated 100-Year Peak Flows and Flow Volumes in the Big Lost River and Birch Creek at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho By L.C. Kjelstrom and Charles Berenbrock U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4163 Prepared in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy Boise, Idaho 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL $URVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 230 Collins Road Box 25286 Boise, ID 83702-4520 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Purpose and scope......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Description of study area.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Previous investigations ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sara L. Rathburn a Prepublication Manuscript Submitted to The
    Pleistocene glacial outburst flooding along the Big Lost River, east-central Idaho Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Rathburn, Sara L. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 12:16:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191351 PLEISTOCENE GLACIAL OUTBURST FLOODING ALONG THE BIG LOST RIVER, EAST-CENTRAL IDAHO by Sara L. Rathburn A Prepublication Manuscript Submitted To the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1989 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This manuscript, prepared for publication in GEOLOGY, has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the Antevs Reading Room to be made available to borrowers as are copies of regular theses and dissertations. Brief quotations from this manuscript are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the department, or the graduate student coordinator, when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Draft November 7, 2008
    Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Draft November 7, 2008 2008 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan January 6, 2009 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 Preface The Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan was developed in late fall of 2006 through the early summer of 2008. It contains information relative to the hazards and vulnerabilities facing Custer County. The jurisdictions participating in this Plan include Custer County and the cities of Challis, Mackay, and Stanley. The City of Clayton will be requested to endorse this Plan and participate in its implementation. This Plan is designed to interface with the State of Idaho Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan published in November 2004 and revised in November 2007. 1 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 This Page Intentionally Blank 2 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 3 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 4 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 This Page Intentionally Blank 5 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 6 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 This Page Intentionally Blank 7 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan Final January 6, 2009 8 Custer County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard
    [Show full text]
  • Library Idaho Technicalbulletin
    Idaho Point-headed Grasshopper Survey and Inventory Idaho Falls District Bureau of Land Management Final Report December 2010 Prepared by: Beth Waterbury, Regional Wildlife Biologist Idaho Department of Fish and Game Salmon Regional Office 99 Highway 93 North Salmon, Idaho 83467 Challenge Cost Share Agreement No. L09AC16255 U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Idaho Falls District and Idaho Department of Fish and Game ABSTRACT The Idaho point-headed grasshopper (Acrolophitus pulchellus) (IPG) is a rare Idaho endemic known to occur in xeric shrublands of Idaho’s Birch Creek and Big Lost River drainages. The species is known from only 17 records dating from 1883 to 1993. Surveys conducted in 2002- 2003 failed to detect IPGs, leading to speculation that the species was extinct. Due to the lack of essential information on distribution and status, the IPG is designated as an Idaho Species of Greatest Conservation Need and a Bureau of Land Management Type 2 Sensitive Species. The purpose of our project was to survey public lands within the known range of this species to demonstrate, if possible, its extant status, evaluate habitat composition and condition at historical sites of collection, and assess its general conservation status. We surveyed 7 historic collection sites and 22 additional sites from 21 July to 20 August 2010. We detected 55 IPGs in 11 of 29 survey sites. We recorded a majority of detections in the Birch Creek Valley of Clark County (n = 41) on public lands managed by the Upper Snake BLM Field Office and the Dubois Ranger District of Caribou-Targhee National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Permit Fact Sheet, City of Mackay, Idaho, #ID0023027
    Fact Sheet - DRAFT NPDES Permit #ID0023027 Mackay WWTP Fact Sheet The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposes to Reissue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit to Discharge Pollutants Pursuant to the Provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to: City of Mackay Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES Permit No. ID0023027 Public Comment Start Date: January 25, 2018 Public Comment Expiration Date: February 26, 2018 Technical Contact: Maxwell Petersen 206-553-6118 800-424-4372, ext. 6118 (within Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington) [email protected] The EPA Proposes to Reissue NPDES Permit The EPA proposes to reissue the NPDES permit for the facility referenced above. The draft permit places conditions on the discharge of pollutants from the wastewater treatment plant to the Big Lost River. In order to ensure protection of water quality and human health, the permit places limits on the types and amounts of pollutants that can be discharged from the facility. This Fact Sheet includes: . information on public comment, public hearing, and appeal procedures . a listing of proposed effluent limitations and other conditions for the facility . a map and description of the discharge location . technical material supporting the conditions in the permit State Certification Upon the EPA’s request, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) has provided a draft certification of the permit for this facility under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Comments regarding the certification should be directed to: DEQ Idaho Falls Regional Office 900 N. Skyline Drive, Suite B Idaho Falls, ID 83402 (208) 528-2650 1 Fact Sheet - DRAFT NPDES Permit #ID0023027 Mackay WWTP Public Comment Persons wishing to comment on, or request a Public Hearing for the draft permit for this facility may do so in writing by the expiration date of the Public Comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Borah Peak Earthquake (M 7.3, Star) in East-Central Idaho
    Geological Field Trips in Southern Idaho, Eastern Oregon, and Northern Nevada Edited by Kathleen M. Haller and Spencer H. Wood Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Open-File Report 2004-1222 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 118 Geologic Field Trips to Central and Southwestern Idaho, Central Nevada, and Eastern Oregon 114�00' ������� � � 44�30' �� 44�30' � �� � � � �� �� � �� � 1983 Gap � �� �� �� � �� �� �� � � � ��� �� � �� � 44�00' 44�00' �� � � ����� ���� ���� ��������� � � ���� 0 10 20 30 km 114�00' Figure 1. Map of Lost River fault and location of the Borah Peak earthquake (M 7.3, star) in east-central Idaho. Solid line shows the 1983 surface rupture on the Lost River fault; dotted line shows unruptured parts of the fault. Field-trip stops are shown by numbered circles. Selected locations are Big Lost River Valley (BLRV), Round Valley (RV), Thousand Springs Valley (TSV), and Willow Creek hills (WC). Segments, from south to north, of the Lost River fault are bounded by double black line: Arco (A), Pass Creek (PC), Mackay (M), Thou- sand Springs (TS), Warm Spring (WS), and Challis (C). 118 Geologic Field Trips to Central and Southwestern Idaho, Central Nevada, and Eastern Oregon Twenty Years After the Borah Peak Earthquake—Field Guide to Surface-Faulting Earthquakes Along the Lost River Fault, Idaho By Kathleen M. Haller and Anthony J. Crone Introduction understanding of the coseismic failure of major range-front normal faults in extensional tectonic settings. The Basin-and-Range region of Idaho north of the Snake The spectacular range front on the southwestern side of River Plain, including the Lost River Range and ranges to the the Lost River Range has caught the attention of many geolo- east (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of East-Central Idaho: Geologic Roadlogs for the Big and Little Lost River, Lemhi, and Salmon River Valleys
    Link and Janecke -- Geology of East-Central Idaho: Roadlogs 295 Geology of East-Central Idaho: Geologic Roadlogs for the Big and Little Lost River, Lemhi, and Salmon River Valleys Paul Karl Link Department of Geology, Idaho State University, Pocatello ID 83209 Susanne U. Janecke Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan UT 84322 INTRODUCTION As part of this introduction we present several summary fig- This article contains a discussion of the regional geology and ures. First is a regional geographic map (Fig. 1), and a simplified historical geography of east-central Idaho, north of the Snake River geologic map on the same base (Fig. 2). The Proterozoic and Plain and southeast of the Salmon River, and four roadlogs for Paleozoic stratigraphic correlation diagram (Fig. 3) also shows the main highways in this huge (15,000-km2) area. The roadlogs thrust fault relations. Figure 4 shows major structures and basins progress from south to north and west to east. They include: of the Trans-Challis fault zone and Figure 5 shows the Challis 1) Big Lost River Valley, Volcanic field. Photographs in the road log section illustrate many 2) Little Lost River-Pahsimeroi Valley, of the field localities. In the introductory summary we cite (out- 3) Birch Creek-Lemhi Valley, and of-sequence with their position in the text) several photographs 4) Stanley to Salmon along the Salmon River. in which specific stratigraphic features are present. This article covers much of the same country described by East-central Idaho contains diverse and economically impor- Ross (1963) in the first geologic roadlog of east-central Idaho, tant, mineral deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson V. Big Lost River Irrigation Dist. Clerk's Record V. 1 Dckt. 35543
    UIdaho Law Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs 10-31-2008 Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation Dist. Clerk's Record v. 1 Dckt. 35543 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/ idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs Recommended Citation "Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation Dist. Clerk's Record v. 1 Dckt. 35543" (2008). Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs. 2196. https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/2196 This Court Document is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vot. --1I.. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ----------· ------------------------~------------------------------ DAVID NELSON and LOY PEHRSON, et al, LAVJ CLER!< Plaintiffs-Counterdefandants-Appellants, ) . ' 1 1 vs. WV u·· '! TI··o.N 1tEt~;t{ih'J< D.fJl'J A.·.. ,G'mNT _l~~ .. ti ., ! ......., .. ,~. -, ..1.,,,1 . ) . ' BIG LOST RIV.ER IRRIGATION DISTRICT; ) Board of Directors, RICHARD REYNOLDS, ) CHARLIE HUGGINS, KENT HARWOOD, ) JOEL ANDERSON, BRUCE WARNER, ) SUl'RE' "!i: CGUF· ·10. 35543 IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF \V ATEf! RESOURCES ) and DAVID R. TUTHILL, JiC,,,, D'cectu,· · Custt:r Couri,Y Cu.sr ·; ~,;.8V-05-·91 ) De f endants-Countet'c la i rnr.n ts~Crvs.s 1i,A'endanrs­ Respondents. .. .. ) and ,_..... .....F_,,,ilc-i.l'-:i,,...J:-~-(.;~-l=,)-,p\i- .. --,-- - I . ROBERTWAiiDOl.:?S,<tal,JAYF.PEARSO ,et I, • . ..·. 1 I Intervenors-CounterclaiH•>.,its-Crossclaimants-Re p~r-., ents ( · ' ,:; I allM! ! l -----------------.-' ___ ___ _ ____ Supreme\l,i~~~1~:.:=.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the CHALLIS NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE CHALLIS NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region Introduction This is a transcription of the Challis National Forest history cataloged in the R4 History Collection as R4-1680-2006-0238. It is apparent that various people added to the original compilation over a period of several years. Forest Service retiree LeAnn Tracy retyped the document so it could be available to and searchable by a wider audience. We have taken the liberty of correcting spelling and typographical errors, reformatting to improve readability (including the addition of headers), relocating some additions to their relevant sections, and generating a table of contents. The original compilation referred to appendices in a “separate folder” but we do not have these. They are: 1. Proclamations 2. Newspaper clippings 3. Progress reports 4. Challis fact sheets 5. Bibliography of historical books 6. Miscellaneous publications, periodicals, etc. 7. Old History File Folder 8. Charlie Langer Memorial 9. Photographs (see photo file for additional pictures) 10. Sawtooth Mountains Study Area Richa Wilson, Regional Architectural Historian October 2009 Cover: Supervisor’s Office & Ranger Station compound in Challis, Idaho. TABLE OF CONTENTS PRE-FOREST HISTORY ............................................................................................................... 4 Yankee Fork Ranger District .................................................................................................... 13 Bayhorse Crossing ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Magnitude of the 100-Year Peak Flow in the Big Lost River at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho
    DOE/ID–22181 ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE OF THE 100- YEAR PEAK FLOW IN THE BIG LOST RIVER AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY, IDAHO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4299 Prepared in cooperation with U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Estimating the Magnitude of the 100-Year Peak Flow in the Big Lost River at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho By Jon E. Hortness and Joseph P. Rousseau Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4299 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Idaho Falls, Idaho 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. Additional information can be Copies of this report can be Copies of this report also are obtained from: purchased from: available in PDF format, which can be viewed using Adobe Acrobat U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Reader at URL: INEEL, MS 1160 Information Services P.O. Box 2230 Box 25286 http://idaho.usgs.gov/public/reports.html Idaho Falls, ID 83403-2230 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and scope. 2 Description of the study area. 2 Previous investigations . 4 Historical peak flows . 5 Explanation of data . 5 Gaging-station data . 5 Adjusted peak-flow data . 8 Estimation of error (confidence limits) . 9 Estimation of the 100-year peak flow .
    [Show full text]