Central Texas Swimming Holes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Barton Springs Pool Health Consultion
Barton Springs Pool Health Consultation BARTON SPRINGS POOL AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS FACILITY ID: TXN000605514 APRIL 18, 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Barton Springs Pool EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Barton Springs Pool is a 1.9 acre pool, fed from underground springs which discharge from the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer. The pool is located within the confines of Barton Creek; however, water from the creek only enters the pool during flood events. The pool is located in downtown Austin and is used year round for recreation. Barton Springs Pool also is one of the only known habitats of the Barton Springs salamander (Eurycea sosorum) an endangered species. The City of Austin has been collecting water and sediment samples from Barton Springs Pool since 1991. Recent articles in the local daily newspaper have raised safety concerns regarding environmental contaminants found in the pool. In response to these concerns, the City Manager closed the pool pending an analysis of the perceived human health risks associated with chemical exposures occurring while swimming in the pool. We reviewed the results from water and sediment samples collected by the City of Austin, the United States Geological Survey, the Lower Colorado River Authority, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. We reviewed over 14,500 individual data points, involving approximately 441 analytes, collected over the past 12 years. We screened the contaminants by comparing reported concentrations to health-based screening values and selected twenty-seven contaminants for further consideration. -
4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project. -
Coordination of Statewide Aquatic Vegetation and Invasive Species
Texas Statewide Aquatic Vegetation and Invasive Species Management Update (a.k.a., “The State of the State”) Monica McGarrity Aquatic Invasive Species Team Lead – Austin, TX AIS Management in Texas • Cost of effective AIS management: ~$45M / year • TPWD total annual AIS budget historically ~$1.4M • Legislature allocated $6.3 M / biennium to TPWD Inland Fisheries for 2016-2017 & 2018-2019 • Federal boater access funds and partner funds augment state-funded efforts Public Awareness Campaigns • Clean, Drain, Dry call to action – “poster child” species • Focus on preventing the spread of AIS by day-use boaters • 2019 - increased focus on targeted marina outreach to prevent movement of mussels on wet-slipped boats Public Awareness Campaigns Zebra Mussel Early Detection • More than 50 lakes monitored by partner collaboration • Plankton samples analyzed with microscopy (CPLM) & eDNA • Settlement samplers & shoreline substrate surveys Water Body Status Classifications • Infested – established; reproducing population. • Positive Lakes – detected more than once; no evidence of reproduction (yet…) • Suspect Lakes – single detection • Inconclusive Lakes – DNA or an unverified suspect organism found in the past year Zebra Mussels Status Update • Infested (15 lakes, 5 river basins) – Austin, Belton, Bridgeport, Canyon, Dean Gilbert†, Eagle Mountain, Georgetown, Lady Bird*, Lewisville, Livingston, Randell †, Ray Roberts, Stillhouse Hollow, Texoma, Travis • Positive – Fishing Hole †, Grapevine*, Lavon, Richland Chambers, Waco, Worth; also river reaches -
River Run Fall 2017
A Publication of the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority Fall 2017 3 / Hydro Repairs Underway 8 / Zebra Mussels 16 / Grant Helps SOLC Constituent Communiqué Building Relationships In its 10-county statutory district, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority works with a variety of customers for water sales and treatment, wastewater treatment, power sales, recreational undertakings and other services. In conducting those operations, GBRA staff also work closely with elected officials, developers and other constituents to determine their current and future needs and to see how GBRA can help address those needs. The purpose of our efforts is to provide exceptional service for their benefit. We are able to do this by ensuring that GBRA has highly skilled employees who receive relevant training year round. This also includes state licensed operators for the water and wastewater treatment facilities that we own and Ithose that we operate in partnership with customers in our basin. Today, GBRA continues to nurture long-standing relationships with its current customers while building new relationships with new partners. Furthering existing partnerships and addressing a need for a geographic area that lacks certain utilities, GBRA is securing a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) to provide wastewater services to an unincorporated area between New Braunfels and Seguin. GBRA will work in partnership with New Braunfels Utilities and the city of Seguin to provide wholesale wastewater treatment to wastewater that is collected from the new developments that are occurring in this high growth area. GBRA is stepping up to build these relationships because the area is growing and circumstances demand it. -
Greenspace Portland
GREENSPACE PORTLAND CITY OF PORTLAND The City of Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) Bureau manages most of the protected natural areas within the city limits. Other large natural area sites include Metro’s Smith and Bybee Lakes Wildlife Area and Oregon State Parks’ Tryon Creek State Natural Area. Additional natural areas are held by Portland’s Bureau of Environmental Services (BES), organizations such the Port of Portland, Three Rivers Land Conservancy and private neighborhood associations. Natural area settings in Portland include forests, meadows, wetlands, streams and riverbanks. The 7,000 acres currently managed by PP&R as natural area are primarily forest (85 percent) and represent the range of forest types naturally occurring in the region including upland Douglas fir stands, ash and cottonwood riparian forests, and younger deciduous forest types. Open woodlands, such as those dominated by Oregon white oak, account for another eight percent of the system. Shrublands and grasslands, including wetland marshes and scrubs, and upland sites occur less frequently but offer unique habitat features. Land Acquisition Program Property acquisitions for park purposes are made possible through a variety of resources. In some cases, funds are obtained for purchase of a specific piece of property through grants or special one-time allocations from City Council. Previous bond measures have also provided resources for park acquisition. However, the Park System Development Charge (SDC) is currently the primary funding source to meet the need created by growth for acquisition of land for future parks and recreation facilities. These funds can also be used for development. SDC funds are generated by a one-time fee that is charged to new residential development at the time the building permit is issued. -
Gooj~ 7 Guadalupe Appraisal District
GOOJ~ 7 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT Main Ollice Schertz Substation 3000 N. Austin St 1101 Eibel Rd. Seguin, Texas 78155 Schertz, Texas 78154 (830) 303-3313 (210) 945-9708 Opt 8 (830) 372-2874 (Fax) (877) 254-0888 (Fax) [email protected] C) C z NOTICE OF MEETING {_;:_ >· -0 ... Notice is hereby given that the Guadalupe Appraisal Review Board will I vefuf"' at~00rltJm. on December 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, & 16, 2020 at the Guadalupe Appraisal D1sthct (~flic~300'0' N. Austin Street, Seguin, Texas 78155. j S c...~ Under the authority of Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, the Board, during the course of the meeting covered by this notice, may enter into closed or executive session for any of the fallowing reasons provided the subject to be discussed is on the agenda for the meeting. • For a private consultation with the Board's Attorney with respect to pending or contemplated litigation, settlement offers, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, clearly conflicts with this chapter. (Sec. 551-071) Notwithstanding Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, the Appraisal Review Board shall conduct a hearing that is closed to the public if the property owner or the chief appraiser intends to disclose proprietary or confidential information at the hearing that will assist the review board in determining the protest The review board may hold a closed hearing under this subsection only on a joint motion by the property owner and the chief appraiser. -
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. -
Local Swimming Committees & Zones
USA Swimming PACIFIC NORTHWEST 45 Local Swimming Committees & Zones INLAND EMPIRE 18 MN MAINE MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA 23 32 38 MICHIGAN OREGON 42 MINNESOTA ADIRONDACK 29 NEW ENGLAND SOUTH DAKOTA 2 33 SNAKE RIVER 51 WISCONSIN 49 59 NIAGARA MICHIGAN 36 SIERRA NEVADA WYOMING 26 LAKE ERIE 60 21 CONNECTICUT PACIFIC 48 MIDDLE 10 4 IOWA 4 ATLANTIC METROPOLITAN 19 27 25 MIDWESTERN 4 28 NEW JERSEY ALLEGHENYMOUNTAIN 34 ILLINOIS INDIANA OHIO UTAH 16 40 55 17 POTOMAC VALLEY WEST COLORADO 46 VIRGINIA 9 MARYLAND CENTRAL 58 VIRGINIA CALIFORNIA MISSOURI VALLEY 24 31 56 8 KENTUCKY OZARK 43 20 OK NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN 37 CALIFORNIA 54 ARIZONA OKLAHOMA 6 NEW MEXICO 41 35 ARKANSAS 3 SOUTH 5 5 CAROLINA 50 SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL SOUTHEASTERN 47 GEORGIA WEST TEXAS 13 57 NORTH TEXAS MISSISSIPPI 39 30 BORDER GULF 7 LOUISIANA 14 22 FLORIDA 11 SOUTH TEXAS 52 HAWAIIAN FLORIDA 15 GOLD COAST KEY LSC Name 12 SOUTH TEXAS zone colors 52 page # Western ALASKA 3 Central boundary lines Eastern Zone LSC Southern State Adirondack Swimming (AD) Eastern Zone That portion of New York State east of the counties of Oswego, Swimming / Natation Canada Onondaga, Cortland and Broome; and north of the counties of Sullivan, Orange and Dutchess. Clinton Franklin Cities (all New York) 1 – Albany St. Lawrence 2 – Lake Placid 3 – Schenectady 2 4 – Utica Jefferson 5 – Watertown Essex 5 NEW ENGLAND SWIMMING, p. 33 Lewis Warren Hamilton Washington Oswego Oneida Onondaga Fulton Saratoga Madison 4 Herkimer Montgomery Schoharie 3 Schenectady Cortland Otsego 1 NIAGARA SWIMMING, p. 36 Albany Rensselaer Chenango Greene Delaware Broome Columbia Ulster MIDDLE ATLANTIC SWIMMING, p. -
Groundwater Availability of the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer, Texas: Numerical Simulations Through 2050
GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY OF THE BARTON SPRINGS SEGMENT OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER, TEXAS: NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS THROUGH 2050 by Bridget R. Scanlon, Robert E. Mace*, Brian Smith**, Susan Hovorka, Alan R. Dutton, and Robert Reedy prepared for Lower Colorado River Authority under contract number UTA99-0 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin *Texas Water Development Board, Austin **Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin October 2001 GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY OF THE BARTON SPRINGS SEGMENT OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER, TEXAS: NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS THROUGH 2050 by Bridget R. Scanlon, Robert E. Mace*1, Brian Smith**, Susan Hovorka, Alan R. Dutton, and Robert Reedy prepared for Lower Colorado River Authority under contract number UTA99-0 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin *Texas Water Development Board, Austin **Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin October 2001 1 This study was initiated while Dr. Mace was an employee at the Bureau of Economic Geology and his involvement primarily included initial model development and calibration. CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA...................................................................................................................................3 -
RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map -
2020 05 May NWACA Newsletter
MAY 2020 VOLUME 11, ISSUE 5 Welcome New New to the Board Members! Neighborhood? By the time you read this, NWACA will have elected a new board for 2020-2022. You may have already read about our new board members via our Facebook group or NWACA Notes email, or on our website. If you’re not a NWACA member or Welcome to NWACA! don’t have access to our social media, you can read about the If this is your first copy of our newsletter, welcome to the NWACA neighborhood! The map shows our new board members in our June newsletter. boundaries – Mopac, RM 2222, Loop 360, and US I would like to express my gratitude for having been able to Highway 183 (Research Boulevard). There are about serve on the NWACA board. I have learned so much and met 13,500 households who are your neighbors and are so many wonderful people; it has been an honor to serve. And, happy you’re here! This newsletter is one way to know what’s happening in NWACA, but I would like to say thank you to the board members that I there’s much more. Check out the quick link For New Neighbors on the have worked with for the past four years. They have all worked home page at www.nwaca.org and visit our public Facebook page. Use amazingly hard. the Membership button on the home page, or use the form at the end of During the “Stay at Home, Stay Safe” period, our board and this newsletter to become a member of NWACA. -
Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, Central Texas
OLD G The Geological Society of America Memoir 215 OPEN ACCESS Barton Springs segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, central Texas Brian B. Hunt Brian A. Smith Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin, Texas 78748, USA Nico M. Hauwert Balcones Canyonland Preserve, City of Austin, Austin Water, Wildland Conservation Division, Austin, Texas 78738, USA ABSTRACT The Barton Springs segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer is a prolifi c karst aquifer system containing the fourth largest spring in Texas, Barton Springs. The Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer supplies drinking water for ~60,000 people, provides habitat for federally listed endangered salamanders, and sustains the iconic recreational Barton Springs pool. The aquifer is composed of Lower Cretaceous carbonate strata with porosity and permeability controlled by dep- ositional facies, diagenesis, structure, and karstifi cation creating a triple permeability system (matrix, fractures, and conduits). Groundwater fl ow is rapid within an inte- grated network of conduits discharging at the springs. Upgradient watersheds pro- vide runoff to the recharge zone, and the majority of recharge occurs in the streams crossing the recharge zone. The remainder is direct recharge from precipitation and other minor sources (infl ows from Trinity Group aquifers, the San Antonio segment, the bad-water zone, and anthropogenic sources). The long-term estimated mean water budget is 68 ft3/s (1.93 m3/s). The Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conserva- tion District developed rules to preserve groundwater supplies and maximize spring fl ow rates by preserving at least 6.5 ft3/s (0.18 m3/s) of spring fl ow during extreme drought.