CHAPTER 30 Gryllotalpinae: Mole Crickets
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Are Biologicals Smart Mole Cricket Control?
Are biologicals smart mole cricket control? by HOWARD FRANK / University of Florida ost turf managers try to control mole faster than the biopesticides, but the biopesticides cricket pests with a bait, or granules or affect a narrower range of non-target organisms and liquid containing something that kills are more environmentally acceptable. The "biora- them. That "something" may be chemi- tional" chemicals are somewhere in between, be- M cause they tend to work more slowly than the tradi- cal materials (a chemical pesticide) or living biologi- cal materials (a biopesticide). tional chemicals, and to have less effect on animals Some of the newer chemical materials, called other than insects. "biorationals," are synthetic chemicals that, for ex- Natives not pests ample, mimic the action of insects' growth hor- The 10 mole cricket species in the U.S. and its mones to interfere with development. territories (including Puerto Rico and the Virgin Is- The biological materials may be insect-killing ne- lands) differ in appearance, distribution, behavior matodes (now available commercially) or fungal or and pest status. bacterial pathogens (being tested experimentally). In fact, the native mole crickets are not pests. These products can be placed exactly where they Our pest mole crickets are immigrant species. are needed. In general, the chemical pesticides work The three species that arouse the ire of turf man- agers in the southeastern states all belong Natural enemies to the genus Scapteriscus. They came from Introducing the specialist natural ene- South America, arriving at the turn of the mies from South America to the southeast- century in ships' ballast. -
House-Invading Crickets
■ ,VVXHG LQ IXUWKHUDQFH RI WKH &RRSHUDWLYH ([WHQVLRQ :RUN$FWV RI 0D\ DQG -XQH LQ FRRSHUDWLRQ ZLWK WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH 'LUHFWRU&RRSHUDWLYH([WHQVLRQ8QLYHUVLW\RI0LVVRXUL&ROXPELD02 HOME AND ■ ■ ■ DQHTXDORSSRUWXQLW\$'$LQVWLWXWLRQ H[WHQVLRQPLVVRXULHGX CONSUMER LIFE House-Invading Crickets rickets belong to the insect near buildings. Once inside, they order Orthoptera, which feed on and cause damage to items Calso includes grasshoppers such as cotton, linen, wool, silk and and katydids. The chirping sounds fur. Materials soiled by perspiration for which they are famous are made or food are more likely to be by the adult males rubbing their damaged. These crickets also eat wings together to attract females. dead or dying insects, including Like their grasshopper and katydid their own species. At times, field 0 1 relatives, crickets have long hind crickets may also cause damage to Approximate size in inches legs fitted for jumping. In addition, field crops. Figure 1. Field cricket. adult females have long, swordlike House cricket. The house ovipositors at the tip of their cricket (Acheta domesticus) is light abdomens for laying eggs in the yellowish-brown and has three soil. darker brown bands across the head Crickets will accidentally invade (Figure 2). The adult stage varies in homes, but only rarely will they length from 0.75 to 1 inch. During reproduce there. The usual point warm weather, house crickets can of entry is through open or poorly live outdoors and are especially 0 1 fitted doors, and cracks in doors, fond of garbage dumps. Approximate size in inches windows, foundations or siding. Like the field cricket, house Figure 2. -
Geographic Distribution of Gryllotalpa Stepposa in South-Eastern Europe, with First Records for Romania, Hungary and Serbia (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllotalpidae)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 605: 73–82Geographic (2016) distribution of Gryllotalpa stepposa in south-eastern Europe... 73 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.605.8804 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Geographic distribution of Gryllotalpa stepposa in south-eastern Europe, with first records for Romania, Hungary and Serbia (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllotalpidae) Ionuț Ștefan Iorgu1, Elena Iulia Iorgu1, Gellért Puskás2, Slobodan Ivković3, Simeon Borisov4, Viorel Dumitru Gavril5, Dragan Petrov Chobanov6 1 “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Kiseleff Blvd., 011341 Bucharest, Romania 2 Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, 13 Baross u., H-1088, Budapest, Hungary 3 14 Lovačka, 21410 Futog, Serbia 4 “St. Kliment Ohridski” University, Faculty of Biology, 8 Dragan Tsankov Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bul garia 5 Institute of Biology, Romanian Academy, 296 Independenţei Blvd., P.O. Box 56-53, 060031 Bucharest, Romania 6 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bul garia Corresponding author: Ionuț Ștefan Iorgu ([email protected]) Academic editor: F. Montealegre-Z | Received 11 April 2016 | Accepted 7 June 2016 | Published 14 July 2016 http://zoobank.org/693BF37D-8C2A-495E-8711-40B2C117EE06 Citation: Iorgu IS, Iorgu EI, Puskás G, Ivković S, Borisov S, Gavril VD, Chobanov DP (2016) Geographic distribution of Gryllotalpa stepposa in south-eastern Europe, with first records for Romania, Hungary and Serbia (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllotalpidae). ZooKeys 605: 73–82. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.605.8804 Abstract Described from the steppe zones north of the Black Sea, Caucasus, and central Asia, Gryllotalpa stepposa Zhantiev was recently recorded from a few localities in Greece, R. -
Orthoptera: Ensifera) in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh Shah HA Mahdi*, Meherun Nesa, Manzur-E-Mubashsira Ferdous, Mursalin Ahmed
Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences Abbreviated Key Title: Sch Acad J Biosci ISSN 2347-9515 (Print) | ISSN 2321-6883 (Online) Zoology Journal homepage: https://saspublishers.com/sajb/ Species Abundance, Occurrence and Diversity of Cricket Fauna (Orthoptera: Ensifera) in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh Shah HA Mahdi*, Meherun Nesa, Manzur-E-Mubashsira Ferdous, Mursalin Ahmed Department of Zoology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh DOI: 10.36347/sajb.2020.v08i09.003 | Received: 06.09.2020 | Accepted: 14.09.2020 | Published: 25.09.2020 *Corresponding author: Shah H. A. Mahdi Abstract Original Research Article The present study was done to assess the species abundance, monthly occurrence and diversity of cricket fauna (Orthoptera: Ensifera) in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. A total number of 283 individuals of cricket fauna were collected and they were identified into three families, six genera and seven species. The collected specimens belonged to three families such as Gryllidae (166), Tettigoniidae (59) and Gryllotalpidae (58). The seven species and their relative abundance were viz. Gryllus texensis (36.40%), Gryllus campestris (18.37%), Lepidogryllus comparatus (3.89%), Neoconocephalus palustris (9.89%), Scudderia furcata (4.95%), Montezumina modesta (6.01%) and Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (20.49%). Among them, highest population with dominance was Gryllus texensis (103) and lowest population was Lepidogryllus comparatus (11). Among the collected species, the status of Gryllus texensis, Gryllus campestris and Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa were very common (VC); Neoconocephalus palustris and Montezumina modesta were fairly common (FC) and Lepidogryllus comparatus and Scudderia furcata were considered as rare (R). Base on monthly occurrence 2 species of cricket were found throughout 12 months, 2 were 9-11 months, 2 were 6-8 months and 1 was 3-5 months. -
The Digger Wasps of Saudi Arabia: New Records and Distribution, with a Checklist of Species (Hym.: Ampulicidae, Crabronidae and Sphecidae)
NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 9 (2): 345-364 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2013 Article No.: 131206 http://biozoojournals.3x.ro/nwjz/index.html The digger wasps of Saudi Arabia: New records and distribution, with a checklist of species (Hym.: Ampulicidae, Crabronidae and Sphecidae) Neveen S. GADALLAH1,*, Hathal M. AL DHAFER2, Yousif N. ALDRYHIM2, Hassan H. FADL2 and Ali A. ELGHARBAWY2 1. Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. 2. Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Science, King Saud University, King Saud Museum of Arthropod (KSMA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. *Corresponing author, N.S. Gadalah, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 24. September 2012 / Accepted: 13. January 2013 / Available online: 02. June 2013 / Printed: December 2013 Abstract. The “sphecid’ fauna of Saudi Arabia (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) is listed. A total of 207 species in 42 genera are recorded including previous and new species records. Most Saudi Arabian species recorded up to now are more or less common and widespread mainly in the Afrotropical and Palaearctic zoogeographical zones, the exception being Bembix buettikeri Guichard, Bembix hofufensis Guichard, Bembix saudi Guichard, Cerceris constricta Guichard, Oxybelus lanceolatus Gerstaecker, Palarus arabicus Pulawski in Pulawski & Prentice, Tachytes arabicus Guichard and Tachytes fidelis Pulawski, which are presumed endemic to Saudi Arabia (3.9% of the total number of species). General distribution and ecozones, and Saudi Arabian localities are given for each species. In this study two genera (Diodontus Curtis and Dryudella Spinola) and 11 species are newly recorded from Saudi Arabia. Key words: Ampulicidae, Crabronidae, Sphecidae, faunistic list, new records, Saudi Arabia. Introduction tata boops (Schrank), Bembecinus meridionalis A.Costa, Diodontus sp. -
Impact of Fipronil Residues on Mole Cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) Behavior and Mortality in Bermudagrass
Cummings et al.: Fipronil Impact on Mole Cricket Behavior and Mortality 293 IMPACT OF FIPRONIL RESIDUES ON MOLE CRICKET (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLOTALPIDAE) BEHAVIOR AND MORTALITY IN BERMUDAGRASS HENNEN D. CUMMINGS1, RICK L. BRANDENBURG2, ROSS B. LEIDY3 AND FRED H. YELVERTON4 1Department of Agribusiness, Agronomy, Horticulture, and Range Management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76402 2Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613 3Department of Molecular and Environmental Toxicology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7633 4Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620 ABSTRACT In a greenhouse experiment, fipronil was applied at 0.014 kg ai/ha to bermudagrass, Cyn- odon dactylon L., in plastic 5-liter containers 120, 90, 60, 30, and 0 days before adding one tawny mole cricket nymph, Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder to the container. After the exposure period, soil in the containers was divided into depth increments of 0-4, 4-8, and 8-18 cm, and cricket status was recorded as dead, absent, or alive by thoroughly examining soil. Soil in the 0-4 cm-increment was analyzed for fipronil and four fipronil metabolite residues. Fipronil residue concentrations decreased with time (C = 0.00002×2 – 0.0053× + 0.3675, R2 = 0.9998 where C = fipronil concentration (µg/g of soil) and x = days after treatment). Concen- trations of two metabolites, fipronil sulfone and fipronil sulfide, increased as fipronil resi- dues decreased. Each treatment’s affect on late instar mole crickets was significantly different from the non-treated; however, there were no significant differences in nymph sta- tus among fipronil-treated containers. -
A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems. -
Feeding Habits of House and Feral Cats (Felis Catus) on Small Adriatic Islands (Croatia)
NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 12 (2): 336-348 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2016 Article No.: e151708 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Feeding habits of house and feral cats (Felis catus) on small Adriatic islands (Croatia) József LANSZKI1*, Eduard KLETEČKI2, Balázs TRÓCSÁNYI3, Jasmina MUŽINIĆ4, Gabriella L. SZÉLES1 and Jenő J. PURGER5 1. Department of Nature Conservation, Kaposvár University, H–7400 Kaposvár, Hungary. 2. Croatian Natural History Museum, HR–10000 Zagreb, Croatia. 3. Duna-Drava National Park Directorate, H–7625 Pécs, Hungary. 4. Institute for Ornithology CASA, HR–10000 Zagreb, Croatia. 5. Institute of Biology, University of Pécs, H–7624 Pécs, Hungary. *Corresponding author, J. Lanszki, e-mail: [email protected] Received: 17. March 2015 / Accepted: 18. July 2015 / Available online: 28. July 2015 / Printed: December 2016 Abstract. The domestic cat (Felis catus), a globally recognised invasive predator, was introduced to the Adriatic islands (Croatia), but its feeding ecology and impacts on biodiversity in this region is unknown. We studied the feeding habits of house cats living in villages and feral cats on the outskirts of villages on two small islands (Olib and Silba) by analysing faecal samples collected in the spring and autumn periods. Our hypothesis was that the feeding strategies of cats as top mammalian predators vary in different environments, due to significant dissimilarities in their food resources. We surveyed the abundance of cats and their primary food types, e.g. small mammals, birds, rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus, and lizards. Our results suggest that house cats fed most often on birds and common household food, while feral cats ate mostly small mammals and lizards. -
Cephalobellus Lobulata N. Sp. (Oxyurida
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 95(1): 49-51, Jan./Feb. 2000 49 Cephalobellus lobulata n. sp. (Oxyurida:Thelastomatidae) a Parasite of Neocurtilla claraziana Saussure (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) from Argentina Nora B Camino+, Guillermo R Reboredo Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, Calle 2, No. 584, 1900 La Plata, Argentina Cephalobellus lobulata n. sp. (Oxyurida: Thelastomatidae) a parasite of the mole cricket Neocurtilla claraziana Saussure (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) found in Argentina is described and illustrated. It is characterized by a short buccal cavity armed with three teeth, a striated cuticle with the first annule wide with four lobes and the second annule divided in twelve lobes. The male have three pairs of preanal papillae and two pairs of postanal papillae. Key words: Cephalobellus lobulata n. sp. - Thelastomatidae - Gryllotalpidae - parasite - cricket - taxonomy - Argentina The genus Cephalobellus was proposed by dissected them in Petri dishes with distilled water Cobb (1920) who described a nematode from a under microscope stereoscope. We found the nema- beetle larva under the name of C. papilliger. He todes (males and females) in the stomodeo intesti- described only the male without any diagram of nal of the insects and then they were killed in dis- the nematode. Christie (1933) described the genus tilled water at 60ºC during 2 min. Posteriorly they Scarabanema as a synonym of Cephalobellus (both were put in a solution of distilled water + TAF (1:1) males were identical), putting S. cylindricum as a during 48 h, finally we finished the fixed in pure synonym of C. papilliger. Basir (1956) recognized TAF. six species from Europe, USA, North India and Living and fixed specimens were employed for Brazil. -
Mole Crickets Scapteriscus Spp
Mole Crickets Scapteriscus spp. Southern mole cricket, Scapteriscus borellii Tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus DESCRIPTION OF INSECT All stages live in the soil and are rarely see on the surface. Immature stage Nymphs of both species are similar in appearance to adults, but lack wings. Nymphs proceed through 8-10 instars ranging in size from 0.2 to 1.25 inches in length. Each instar is progressively larger with wing buds apparent on later instars. Color varies from gray to brown. Pronotum (large shield behind head) with distinctive mottling or spots, depending on species and location. Mature stage Adults are somewhat cylindrically shaped, light colored crickets 1.26 to 1.38 inches in length. Adults have two pairs of wings, but only fly at night during two brief flight periods in fall and early spring. Spring flights are generally more extensive than fall flights. Damaging stage(s) Both nymphs and adults cause damage Predictive models (degree day, plant phenology, threat temperatures, other) Eggs being to hatch at threat temperatures of 65° F and higher (spring/early summer in most locations). Egg-laying and hatch timing are affected by soil moisture. Threat temperatures can be used to trigger preventive treatments. See the article, “Threat temperatures” for more information. Preventive treatments should be applied prior to egg-hatch (early June) or at the time of peak hatch (last week of June, first week of July in most years and locations). Weekly soap flushes in June and early July is the best method to determine when hatch is occurring, and the best time to treat. -
Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)
3613 The Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3613-3618 Published by The Company of Biologists 2008 doi:10.1242/jeb.023143 Hearing and spatial behavior in Gryllotalpa major Saussure (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) Daniel R. Howard1,2,*, Andrew C. Mason2 and Peggy S. M. Hill1 1University of Tulsa, Faculty of Biological Sciences, 600 South College, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA and 2University of Toronto Scarborough, Department of Life Sciences, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 23 September 2008 SUMMARY The prairie mole cricket (Gryllotalpa major Saussure) is a rare orthopteran insect of the tallgrass prairie ecosystem of the south central USA. Populations are known to currently occupy fragmented prairie sites in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas and Missouri, including The Nature Conservancyʼs Tallgrass Prairie Preserve in north central Oklahoma. Prairie mole cricket populations were surveyed at this site and at another site in Craig County, OK during the spring of 2005 and 2006, using the male cricketʼs acoustic call to locate advertising aggregations of males. Five males from one large aggregation were removed in a study to describe (1) the hearing thresholds across the callʼs range of frequencies, (2) the distances over which the higher harmonic components of the maleʼs calls are potentially detectable, (3) the speciesʼ sensitivity to ultrasound and (4) the spatio-auditory dynamics of the prairie mole cricket lek. Results indicate that G. major has a bimodal pattern of frequency tuning, with hearing sensitivities greatest at the 2 kHz carrier frequency (41 dB SPL) and declining through the callʼs frequency range (84 dB at 10 kHz). -
List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites