University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository

Res Gestae Law School History and Publications

1987 Vol. 35, No. 21, March 25, 1987 University of Michigan Law School

Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/res_gestae Part of the Legal Education Commons

Recommended Citation University of Michigan Law School, "Vol. 35, No. 21, March 25, 1987" (1987). Res Gestae. Paper 341. http://repository.law.umich.edu/res_gestae/341

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School History and Publications at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Res Gestae by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ,71"'" ;;c , c c c;:::: �)(_ (_ LAW Ltbnnr<( Brief Interlude

Vo1.35 No.21 The University of Michigan Lnw School March25, 1987 Exec Board Letter Sparks Debate By Rebecca Redosh of the editorial, the board decided to The letter stuffed in all law students' rustribute its own response, rather than lSSSElection Results pendaflexes last week from the LSSS writing to the RG rurectly. Courtade ran Executive Board sparked debate and for president in thls week's elections. Both President-Bruce Courtade dissension among the senate at its of Courtade's opponents, also senate Monday night meeting. In a very close members, approved the letter prior to its Vice-President-Michael McMurray vote, the senate decided not to reimburse insertion in the pendatlexs. Bruce Courtade the $33 he spent making Courtade said the quote reported in Treasurer-�e Larson copies of the letter. the R G misrepresented his actual Secretary-Bill Bock The executive board of the Senate meaning, because it was out ofthe context asserted that Courtade and LSSS President of the preceerung discussion. It came at the Third Year Reps-Jenny Delessio Reggie Turner had been "misquoted" in end of a five-minute talk at that week's an RG erutorial last week. The letter to meeting, during which the senate JeffCrawford law students, drafted by Courtade, expressed frustTationat theRG's refusal to explained that his comment had been print LSSS election deadlines because of Second Year Reps-Marija Willen taken from the "uncorrected" minutes of space limitations in that week's issue. Brian Gearinger the meeting, instead of the corrected and The meaning of the quote, Courtade's approved version. letter stated, was that should the senate Board of Governors-Danielle Carr Each week at its meeting, the senate encounter problems having its election reviews minutes from the previous week's deadlines published again, "in the event meeting. At that time senate members things ever did come to push and shove, he may amend, change or strike anything was confident that the administration discussions at a meeting, then the senate thls week. they may have said at the previous would support the LSSS." should expect it may be reported,he said. Adrutionally, a senate member meeting, or that may have been Though the letter carried the �Ifyou don't want to be damaged by reportedthat he saw approximately100 law erroneously recorded. The senate then endorsementof the executiveboard, not all what you say, then watch what you say," students at the showing of American approves and accepts the minutes into the senate members felt so strongly about it. Dater said. Pictures thls past week. The LSSS helped to record. The Senate does the procedure to Elliot Dater, a third-year representative In other business, the senate fund this multimedia presentation ensure the that the minutes correctly said he did not approve of the letter, nor of appropriated $180 for the registTation fees produced by Jacob Holdt, which drew a reflectthe contents ofthe meeting. senate members cautiously phrasing and of the two softbalJ teams representing very large crowd to Rockham Courtade said because the senate re-phrasing comments at the meetings. If Mkhigan Law School at the Law School Auditorium. elections followed so closely to the printing something is said or implied in National Softball Tourney in Virginia Ringes, Kahn Vie for NCAA Contest Crown

Providence all the way. I pick them over By VinceBG88 their eventual championship game The top two prognosticators entering opponent, Indiana." the Sweet Sixteen weekend, Mark Ringes At least one member of theRG panel of and Hilde Kahn, are tied going into the experts rebels at the thought of the Friars Final Four in the RG's NCAA tourney as champions. Chris Allabashl says, contest. However, several contestants "After seeing most of my picks for the remain in striking range for first place.. Final Sixteen wind up in the loss column, The scores registered by the 134 I'm picking UNLV to win it all, thereby participants in the RG contest mnge from jinxing their chances completely." a high of 80 to a low of 42 after four rounds of the NCAA tourney. (The 135th participant, identified as Adolph Rupp, is Fin a I Four not being counted out of kindness to the memory of the great, late conch. The Rupp Forecasters entry surely would have had one of the lowest scores, because it picked Kentucky Photoby TomKnox 1. (tie) Hilde Kahn, 2L. & Mark Ringes, as national champ.) 1L, 80 Sadly, the end has come for many of ContestHilde co-leader Kahn studieswinninc herc:banoesfor the NCAA conteGt 3. (tie) Todd Duchene, 2L, & Kendall the entries. Such teams as North place in the tourney contest. Nonetheless, nlinois, Iowa (the choke-eyes) all let me James, 3L, 72 Carolino, Iowa, Georgetown and they have ventured forth their final set of down. I still don't know why North 5. Tim McClain, 3L, 71 Alabama were popular predictions for the preructions for the tournament. Carolina lost. It will be Providence and Final Four but were eliminated during Steve Steinborn, winner of last year's UNLV in the finals with Providence 6. (tie) Steve Cernak, 1 L, Andrew M. the Sweet Sixteen weekend. On the other contest, says, "There isn't much doubt that winning, because I've been completely Kenefick, 2L, & Matthew Meza, 3L, 70 hand, no one, absolutely no one aL all, the ACC is the best conference. Until the wrong so far and I see that as the least 9. (tie) Eric Luoma, 1 L, & Jennifer picked Providence for the Final Four, Big Ten plays good teams outside their likely outcome." Sherman, 1 L, 69 though eight wise (lucky? brave?) conference, they will continue to be the Big Providence received a vote of 11. (tie) Scott Bassett, faculty, Brian participants selected Lhe Friars as a Final Disappointment. I refuse to pick any more confidence from another RG expert, Joe Beutner, 3L, Kevin Holton, 3L, Don Eight team. games, but they should be fantastic. OK, Bermudez. "The true Cinderellas in this Plum, 2L, & Bill Riedman, 1 L. 67 Sadly, too, the momhers of the RG's Indiana to win it all." tourney are Providence and Syracuse. 16. (tie) Nancy Rose, 3L, and Reid panel of experts and celebrities find Steve Hunter confesses, "Big Ten There ca.n only be one Cinderella, and I Rozen. 2L, 66 themselves out of the running for first loyalty blinded me once again. Purdue, am going heart over mind by taking Ree Ge:st.a&-March25, 1987-pagetwo

F.dilt:Jr.fn.CAU/. ReidJ.Rou:n OpWon: Joc:lto l[nappmann Letters Frattu-n.: Bob M u !len Bu.iMu:Newdow 1\Uke Lou! in tlvl)oQg R4w: Gl"'lham, T\m Thomp80n PlwtlJf/ropAy;Sch�ker, Unda Tom Ko0111: Gropllica.Mllto Cnmer Staff: llllnio-,Jlm Sk:!I."G Komic,John WeDdlandt,Jen!Ccr� U� Racism is Real Issue R.ecbb.Unda Kim. Miller.I>lan.fte Vlnoe U. B-. Batey. llelloy Grimm. RuthZlti\J'Dernwu" Drew MrutyKaro. Farlouo, B.... d Lane To theEditor: principle that all people are enLitled to equal concern One hopes that Barry Petersen·s intemperate and respect. Now, we can imaginl' the quick response: Tho Ru O..ol.ao lo pubhohod ... ry Wodneeda1 durlo1 \he r•i"lar le ou\horllu and\ht Caao Eklund's and Dean G<>rdan's concerns about thl' intolerant of the intolerant? We think not. At base or. ctedlled and nolllled. Walliftl addn>u Unlvuwl\y or )llcblpn Law School, AM Art-, MI. 481 011-1215. PhaM:(JIS) 763-«13.1. harassment of students with the actions of Joseph here are substantive value choices-a willingness to McCarthy. say certa.in things ure evil nnd \'tTong. We should We are equally troubled by the RG's persistent not-under the comfortable mantle of ethical desire to transmute condemnation of racism into calls relativism-shy awny from sut'h judgments. To us, ProfessionallyResponsible for censorship. Perhaps the RG is particularly (and racism JS an evil and defense of racism is an evil. To properly) concerned about First Amendment rights. those who would nssnil the deans we say: don't hide W ITII ALL TllE TALK about harassment But the cry of censorship has hud •!,;;unfortunate effect behind neutral souncting claims of "tolerance for all." beingbruited about the law school.we thinkit would of taking our focus off the underlying issue-that Engage the deans m the d.Jscussion on their terms: be instructive to remind the student body of the serious harms have been innicted on members of the Shouldn't we affirm the principle that harassment of minority students is wrong (yes, even intolerable) and disciplinary procedures available to the harassed law school community. It may well be that some of the activities that have been at the center of controversy are will we together try to create a community where such and downtrodden. "protected" speech. But the fact that the First acts do not occur? The perpetratorofharassment can bebrought Amendment might prevent state regulation of certain Alex Alein.i.koff beforethe LawSchool Court. There can beno doubt kinds of speech certainly does not. mean that all such MichaelRo8enzweig about thisfact, because there is a specificsection of protected speech ought to be engaged in. It seems to us the ''Rules of Conduct and Disciplinary that reflective, sensitive individuals might well decide Editor's Reply: It has rwt been our intention, during the Procedures" devoted solely to harassment. That that some kinds of speech are hurtful and destructive of pest few weeks, to "tronsmute condemnation of racism provision defines harassment as "any assault commuruty and therefore decide not to exercise their into calls for censorship.·· We do not advocate racism upon,threat against, or interferencewith the work liberties to the fullest. Moreover, some of the actions to or intolerance, nor are we very fond of racists. But or study of a member of the faculty or staff or a which minority students have been subjected are not while eueryone is talking about eliminating racism at student at the school" Think about that the next exercises of free speech; they are outright acts of the uniuersity, nobody has addressed the issue of time you'retearing all the pages out of the Federal harassment. Consider just the most recent example. A censorship. We do not want to distract people from problem of racism by pointing out these free speech Reporter. minority law student walking on South University was concerns, but neither do we think that such concern.s More interesting, however, is the Committee followed by a car of white students shouting racial epithets. Is this conduct that the university has no right repreRent a red herring. It is a very real possibility on Professional Responsibility. This group, to seek tostop? that, in their zeal to silence racists or homophobes, consisting of three faculty members plus an Whatwe fear most, and what we see repeatedly in ckdica.ted and sincere individual.� or groups may stifle optional student member,has the ability, when a legitimate expression. For the RG, this pos.�ibility of guilty the pages of the RG, is abstract.ion of the issue to a student is judged to be of conduct making ctiscussion of tolerance. We do not believe that all censorship is especially worrisome, and is something him or her unfit for the practice of law, to place a intolerance is unjustifiable. This society ought not to which has uniquely confronted the law school report in that student's permanentfile. This report tolerate racism, sexism, homophobia, poverty or community in recent weeks. We donot feel the need to then will.lll08tlikely be sent to thebar examiners of hunger. To condemn such acts is to reaffirm the apologize if we focus on that aspect of the controversy.

the statethe inwhich studentaeeks to practice after • eraduation. IS We are awarethat anyone canwrite to the bar RG Like Ungrateful Whore examiners in any state and fink on any law To theEditor: wish that you would respect my right to criticize the Res I can understand the disappointment you student seeking admission to any bar. That fact Gestae's ectit<>rial board when it doesn't live up to its expressed in your March 18 editorial about the minutes has been mentionedseveral times in recentweeks, agreements. It is ludicrous to imply that senate of the March 9 meeting at the Law School Student and we have no reason to doubt it. Thatbeing the funding of the Res Gestae is some kind of quid pro quo Senate. Unfortunately, the minutes were inaccurate. case,aome have arguedthat what the Committeeon for cooperation in the election process. Because of your Bruce and I are oot interested in curbing the ectitorial ProfessionalResponsibility does is no different unilateral abrogation of our agreement, you freedom of the Rea Gestae. We are interested in what private citizen do, and sothere jeopardized the timing of the senate election and you than any may ensuring that the student body has fair notice of is no measure of extraordinary punishment may have prevented an interested student from getting · upcoming elections as is required by the LSSS the information needed to file an election petition. involved inthe Comm ittee's procedures. constitution and the election code. Nobody is going to take action against the Res Accepting that premise, it seems that the The fact that you "don't give a damn about the Ckstae. You have the right to beinaccurate, to be mean LSSS constitution" is totally irrelevant. For years that Committee is redundant. H the worst thing the spirited, to be sexist and to be subtly racist. Along with constitution has required the senate to fund the Res Committeedo can isno morethan what any Joeoff these rights, however, comes the possibility that you will Gestae because it provides a valuable service to the law the street can do, what is the incentive inbeing a be criticized as you criticize others. school student body (some may disagree). You seem to member of the Committee? How can the Reginald M. Turner. Jr. make much of the fact that the Res Gestae may no administration find faculty members who are P.S. The Res Gestae should be aware that each longer need funding from the senate. I'd like to willing to gothrough the procedural nonsense ofa week, the senate approve the previous meeting's remind you that this was made possible because this full·blown hearing when they write a report at minutes with corrections. The minutes of March 9 can year's senate voted the ResGestae an abnormally large were approved with corrections on March 16, prior to the home? subsidy so you could purchase the necessary computer publication of the inaccurate March 18 ectitorial. equipment. We also lobbied faculty members and The obvious answer is thatthe letter sent by Editor's Reply: We are not unaware of the possibility admirustrators to supplement this subsidy because we John and Jane Q.Public doesnot beara University of being criticizedfor what appears in the RG. In fact, felt that an independentRes Ckstae would be a stronger of Michiaran Law School letterhead. Bar we come to expect it. We are keen to hear the views of paper. We also hoped that eliminating the $5800 a year examiners,although civil servants, are not so dim our rea

To theEditor: does the public airing of those thoughts cease to be sanctionable behavior. The reference to the white male I think the furor over the letters from Deans protected free expression and start to be harassment of law student society posters suggests that they view Eklund and Gordan and from the Task Force misses others? tasteless humor or any public airing of racist, sexist or the pmnt. Certainly we don't want the university or the We are in the process of bemg trained to identify anti-gay beliefs as ground for imposing sanctions. bar to impose sanctions solely on the bnsis of unpopular, l�.>gal issues and formulate legal standards to anwer Such a standard is unacceptable because it privately held beliefs. As has bt>en pointed out, this these types of qu�.>stions. I am not sure where exactly the substantially impinges on fundamental free speech smacks of McCarthyism or a witch hunt, and is line between harassment and free expression should be rights. The Dt>ans should be faulted, as college completely contrary to our notion of fundamental drawn. I would, however, say that behaviour qualifies administrators and as lawyers, for not clearly individual rights. The university should not try and as harassment when a person or group singles out an identifying the issue and describing precisely the legislate morality. indiv1dual and holds that individual up to public standard of behavior they were proposing. However, Probably all of us, mnlt> or female, black, ridicule and scorn solely on the basis of a superficial the University has an obligation to protect individuals hispanic or white, gay or straight, have harbort>d racist, characteristic like ethnic background or sexual studying here from harassment by others. In the rush sexist or anti-gay thoughts at some time. We may preference. to protect free expression here on campus, we should not have expressed those thoughts to friends and The letter sent by Deans Eklund and Gordan was losesight of that other goal. acquaintances. The rl:'al issue here is: At what point imprecise as to where they would draw the line for CynthiaTurik Undergrad Invasion Must be Stemmed sensible plan of limited access would include undergraduates, not to mention non-students, these To theEditor: provisions for the access of non-law students with thefts will, of course, continue. l'm certain that all of In response to his letter last week lamenting the passes, needing to do legal research. widespread feehng among law students that non-law those who have experienced the horror-or those who .Moreover, as Mr. Benyas fails to reali�r at fear such a horror--<>f IO&ing an annotated c� book students should be denied access to the reading room, I least fails to address-far more is at stake here than one week before a final will enthusiastically agree can only comment that Edward Benyas's emotional study space in the reading room. The non-law students with me. appeal-if that's whaL it was--was most unpersuasive. use our entire school-the Reading Room, the Finally, regarding our �ethical obligation" to Cliches about breaking down elitist attitudes among underground section whenever guards are not on duty, provide unlimited access to our specialized facility, lawyers and fostering an open, diverse university the stacka area even when guards are on duty, both might I remind .Mr.Benyas that most if not all of our community may have appeal to some, however forgive snack bar/lounge areas, etc. Another crucial point is facilities have been paid for either through gifta to the me if I find other causes more deserving of my support that of the security of students' personal belongings law school or through the support of our law school and sympathy than that of the medical, MBA, or and law school property ( e.g. books, bulletin boards). alumni. I for one know that when it comes time for me undergraduate student looking for a change of While it is possible that some of the book/notebook be making contributions I will be rar more generous atmosphere. Breaking down the stereotype of the elitist to stealing and bulletin board vandalization has been lawyer can be far better accomplished through ifI know that the benefits of my gifta will accrue to the done by our fe11ow law students, at least with a small, substantive pro bono work for underprivileged groups law school students and faculty than if I am convinced than throu�h inconveniencing ourselves for the benefit relatively close-knit professional community there that such benefit will be diffused throughout the of other elite groups. As far as any legitimate need for can be some measure of internal control/self undergraduate student body. access to our specialized legal facility, presumably any monitoring. With the facility open to 30,000 David Cbinofsky LAW STUDENTS PHOENIX LAW FIRMS SPONSOR OPEN HOUSE

You are Invited to an Informal program about living and practicing law In PHOENIX, ARIZONA. Please join us for refreshments and conversation on

Tli:SOAY University of Mchigan 7, 1987 April School of Law 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. The Lawyers Cllb, Main LOll'lg8

Brown & Bain Jennings, Strouss & Salmon O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson; Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears Fennemore, Craig, von Ammon, Udall & Powers Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes Lewis & Roca Snell & Wilmer Streich, lang, Weeks & Cardon

mrhe legal community in the metropolitan Phoenix area is composed of diverse firms of varying sizes. We encourage you to explore opportunities for practicing in the metropolitan Phoenix area and to contact or interview with other law firms not sponsoring this Program. " See the Placement Office for Fall Interview datesand firm resumes. ResGesLa&-Mareh 25,1987 page four Diversions Platoon Winto Oscar Battle ByJimKomie some of the other nominees will be denied Ofthe two Britishers in this category, though Mary Elizabeth Mastriano (The If the first casualty of war is a real shot at an Oscar because such a big Michael Caine and Denholm Eliot, only Color of Money) has a great name, the innocence, then the second would be my star is owed one. Bob Hoskins, a sort of Caine stands a real chance. Eliot is just smart money is down against her. last-year's Oscar picks. Seldom has British Danny Devito, was terrific in too unknown, and though his performance That leaves Maggie Smith and anyone done so poorly, with the possible Mona Lisa - be's probably the most inA Room With a View was qwte good, the Dianne West. This is a tough choice. exception of the Free Press's Catherine deserving. competition isjust tootough. Smith is always terrific and her turn inA Rambeau, and she doesn"t work there A surprise nominee was jazz Caine might have just the opposite Room With a View was no exception. West anymore. saxophonist Dexter Gordon for his acting problem- he mjght be too big of a star to was equally as good m Hannah and Her Well, I'm bnck, and so are my picks. debut in 'Round Midnight. l"m not sure win an Oscar for a supporting role. Sisters as the sister Woody Allen It seems like an easierjob this year, with how much acting was involved in Besides, if he was only a supporting actor eventually winds up marrying. Though clear favorites is several categories. The Gordon"s portrayal of an alcoholic ja:zz in Hannah and Her Sisters, who was the my stomach tells me I'm making a envelopes, please. musician on his last legs, but he certainly lead actor? mistake, I'm going to pick West, who BESTPicrtJRE: It has to be Platoon, a was compelling. My enthusiastic choice for Best seems to be on the verge of becoming a big much-acclaimed movie thnt delved into William Hurt in Children of a Lesser Supporting Actor is Dennis Hopper for his star. new territory for Hollywood with its God and James Woods in Sa/uack>r are the performance as Shooter in Hoosiers. This Best Director will also be an "reaUstic" depiction of a soldier's life in darkest of dark horses. is one actor I not only feel will win , but interesting category to watch. Oliver Stone Vietnam. Though I wonder whether BEST ACTRESS: In a tough category should win. Hopper is hot in Hollywood seems the logical choice for Platoon, but I Platoon's realism wasn't overestimated, (like this one), an Oscar-picking veteran these days, drawing accolades both for have a feeling that David Lynch might the film's quality wasn't. always works by process of eUmjnation. Hoosiers and Blue Veluet. Hopper's sneak in for Blue Ve luet, a much more Platoon's only real competition will So goodbye, Jane Fonda in The Morning charisma should carry him to a much­ ambitious film. Best Original Score has come from Woody Allen's Hannah and After and Marlee Matlin from Children of deserved victory here. got to go to Herbte Hancock for 'Round Her Sisters. But Allen is so anti­ a Lesser God, although the Academy could Midnight. Hollywood that I doubt the Academy would generate much pathos by giving Matlin, BEST SUPPORTINGACTRESS: Last year, give him an Oscar when tlie have a good Best Supporting Actress was the toughest who happens to be deaf, the Oscar. I think The Oscars will be presented next ex.cuse not to. category to pick. Not so this year, with we can also count out Sissy Spacek in Monday, March 30, and will be televised The other nominees stand less of a Tess Harper fromCrimes ofthe Heart and Crimes ofthe Heart. on ABC. chance of winning than I do of being That ]eaves Sigourney Weaver in Children of a Lesser God 's Piper Laurie selected tQ replace Dean Sandalow - A Aliens, and Kathleen Turner from Peggy sharing not a hope between them. And Room With a View is too British, The Su� Got Married. I haven't seen either of a Mission too preachy, and Children film, and each actress is about due for an Lesser God too pedestrian to challenge for Oscar. Cren•e Ball-Tickets go on sale next week, 10:00 a.ru. t.o 3:00 p.m., in front of Room 100. the title. Weaver, however, will fall by the 8:30-1 :00, As always, the Academy ignored 'rho Ball is April 3, from at tho wayside because the Hollywood -Notices-- Union Ballroom. Tickot11 are $30 per couple, or several of my favorite films, includjng estabHshment doesn't take sci-fi films $15 for o single ticket. Got ready for the social Blue Veluet, 'Round Midnight, and My seriously. I say it's Turner, with Matlin a event of the season! Beautiful Laundrette. Of these three, I possible surprise winner. would give my personal Best Picture of BESTSUPPORTING ACTOR: Another Misain.:-One keg t.appcr from the GO's party. SFF, Part 1-Remcmbcr that this is the last 1986 to My Beautiful Loundrette, a great, Oscar-picking technique is to eliminate This i11 LSSS money paying for it: if found, week to make your SFF pledge. Pledge cards great movie about the interaction of actors from the same film nominated in please return t.o tho Senate office, 217 Hutchins are available outside Room 100. Thanks for Pakjstani immigrants and the British the same category. This year, Platoon's Hall. yoursupport. working class in South London. Tom Berenger and Willem Dafoe are in a BEST ACTOR: The only easier choice SFF, Part U-SFF applicants must fill out n position to cancel each other out. The Forum-The University of Michigan chapters than Best Picture isBest Actor. There is no work-study eligibility form immediately (even strength of their performances and the of the National Lawyer& Guild •nd the if you don't. think you would be el igible) and way that Paul Newman will not win for momentum of Platoon, however, may American Civil Liberties Union are turn it into Katherine Got.tschalk in the his portrayal of Fast Eddie Felson in The allow them to overcome this obstacle, just sponsoring a panel discussion on the topic Financial Aid office. It is crucial that you fill Color of Money. Newman has never won --prug Testing In the Workplace." This event as last year Oprah Winfrey managed to this out if you're even considering applying for an Oscar, and he's deserved it many is scheduled for Thursday, March 26 at 7:30 an SFF fellowship. Complete applications are sneak by her The Color Purple co-star, p.m., in Room 100 of Hutchins Hall. For times before. They owe it to him. if only for due March 25. It you have any questions, please Margaret Avery, to take Best Supporting further information contact the NLG at 763- leave a note in Nancy Radner"s pcndaflex. the cumulative strength of his work. Actress. 2300. In many respects, it's unfortunate that Law In The Raw BY DOUG GRAHAMAND TIM THOMPSON

Q: Now, Mrs. Johnson, how was your firstmarriage Just Answer tlu!Question terminated? It's AboutCrime A: By Death. Real transcripts from real trials. Would we lie? Q: And by whose death was it terminated? Mark Kadish of ITT Chicago-Kent College of Law has made some enemies among his student's parents. Q: Did you ever stay all night with this man in New Family Aduocate, S ummer 1981 and Kadish is a professor of the school's teaching clinic York? has prompted a few sons and daughters to switch from A: I refuse to answer that question. That Was No Lady, That corporate to criminal Jaw by getting them involved in Q: Did you ever stay all night with this man in such matters as the Gacy appeal (he lOlled boys and Chicago? Was My Connection buried them in the crawl space under his house), the A: I refuse to answer that question. F.A.L.N. case (a Puerto Rican terrorist group Q: Did you ever stay all night with this man in Billy Idol gets the Gentleman Award of the Week for responsible for bombings in Chjcago and New York), Miami? a stawment he made to New York police. When and consumer class action swts. ""There are parents A: No. questioned by police about some of the drug ··crack"" he everywhere who will never speak to me," Kadjsh was holding while he walked down a Manhattan street, A Philadelphia lawyer who was representing a reports. We guess the parenta are concerned about the the rock star reportedly told police: ""It's not mine. She defendant accused of murder almost fainted when a age-old maxim "Crime (law) doesn"t pay."" handed it to me." His girlfriend was arrested. Sounds character witness replied to a question about the like Billy may be dancing with himself for some time. The Reader, Dec.19,1986 defendant's reputation by stating "he was a straighL shooter." Newsweek, March2, 1987