DOCSLIB.ORG

The Story of Stonehenge Patricia Southern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Story of Stonehenge Patricia Southern The Prehistoric Society Book Reviews THE STORY OF STONEHENGE BY PATRICIA SOUTHERN Amberley Press. 2012. 158p; 19 text figs, 52 plates. ISBN978-1-4456-0563-0, pb, £16.99 The literature on this iconic monument continues to grow. What more can be said about Stonehenge and what is there new to say? Books aimed at children, the general public and specialists alike tend to recycle the same information whilst others explore fantasy in their striving for alternative enlightenment. Although we are getting there, no-one really knows what Stonehenge was ‘ for ’ – the most fundamental question most frequently asked by the interested non-specialist. This simple question is perhaps the most difficult to answer and as a result the floodgates of theory, speculation and sheer lunacy can be thrown wide open. Consequently the literature on Stonehenge ranges from the scholarly to the ridiculous within a recycled framework of the undeniable facts – the stones themselves. This book does nothing to advance our knowledge of Stonehenge and must be listed amongst the recyclers. After a brief introduction that clearly shows that the author is not up to date with the literature, there follows a series of chronologically-based chapters detailing the history of the site from the Mesolithic to the antiquarians. The chapters are all very simply written and we have rather patronising definitions of Mesolithic, microlith and megalith which makes me wonder if the book is aimed at children though this is not stated on the dust-jacket. This simplicity is continued through the book and is rather annoying. We have undiscovered causewayed enclosures ‘lurking’ (p20) and animal bones with ‘butcher marks’. The description of the early Neolithic field monuments is of poor quality, confusing chambered tombs and earthen long barrows (p.24-5) and no causewayed enclosures or long barrows in the vicinity of Stonehenge itself are mentioned. At least with cursus monuments, erroneously assigned to the early Neolithic in England, it is the Greater Stonehenge cursus that gets the (limited) attention. The discussion of Stonehenge 1 is fair but again written so simplistically. The author discusses the orientation and the major phase 1 elements. The internal timber structures are described and discussed as is the southern entrance. The lunar and solar orientations are also debated openly and cautiously. Even the possibility of the Aubrey Holes having held bluestones and the mention of Bluestonehenge shows awareness of some of the results of the Stonehenge Riverside Project. Chapter 3 is less accurate. Attempting to look at the ‘people’ who built Stonehenge, the long house from Lismore Fields, Buxton is given as an example of early architecture despite its early Neolithic associations. There is an attempt to reconstruct Neolithic Society but it is undertaken with such a broad brush that it is at the same time neither contentious nor accurate and so many bold statements are unsubstantiated by archaeological data or specific examples. Thus we have hallucinogens in ‘a pot from Scotland’, presumably Balfarg and now seriously questioned. Grooved ware and Peterborough ware are described together and their interaction explained even though it is acknowledged that the two were not strictly contemporary. Indeed current opinion is that the two styles hardly overlapped at all. Chapter 4 is more about how the Bluestones arrived at Stonehenge than Stonehenge itself and there seems slight confusion regarding the supposed origins of the Bluestones (Preseli) and the newly discovered location (Craig Rhosyfelin). Chapter 5 describes the sarsen arrangements, conventionally phase 3. The monument is described with very little reference to sequences and dates. The transportation of the stones, their finishing, setting and the fixing arrangements of the lintels are all described in some detail and the discussion about the altar stone – standing or not – owes much to Aubrey Burl (though without acknowledgement). Chapter 7, The Stonehenge People (also borrowed from Burl) is another attempt to analyse contemporary society though extending not from the time of Stonehenge but right up until the end of the Bronze Age. It is simplistic in the extreme, almost totally based on burial (‘burials’ is used when ‘inhumations’ are intended) with settlement being given the most cursory of treatments. The chapter certainly does not convey the complexity of the period. The book ends with a survey of the Iron Age and later history of the monument, and its description by early chroniclers and antiquarians. Again it is re-hashed material and there is nothing new. The glossary of terms is simplistic and, I would think, largely unnecessary and the list of further reading is not only pitifully small but contains works of a very general nature – all of them (except Cleal et al. ) popular works. As mentioned above, the general nature, the simplistic language, the lack of critical analysis and the complete lack of referencing, suggest to me that this is a book aimed at children rather than a mature audience. If this is the case, then it seems surprising that it is not mentioned on the dust- jacket. Certainly I see no other audience for a work of this kind. Furthermore, even a children’s book deserves better quality illustrations – the line drawings are particularly poor. Alex Gibson University of Bradford Review submitted: September 2012 The views expressed in this review are not necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews Editor TITLE OF BOOK HERE, AND AUTHORS Location, publisher, year. Pages, figs photos pb ISBM (£€price) Review here The study of British rock art is flouring as never before, and these two books are both outstanding contributions to the field, although markedly different in content and approach. Author Institution Review submitted: Month Year The views expressed in this review are not necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews Editor .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 30/09/2021 08:59:09
    Reframing the Neolithic Item Type Thesis Authors Spicer, Nigel Christopher Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 30/09/2021 08:59:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/13481 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Reframing the Neolithic Nigel Christopher SPICER Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Department of Archaeological Sciences School of Life Sciences University of Bradford 2013 Nigel Christopher SPICER – Reframing the Neolithic Abstract Keywords: post-processualism, Neolithic, metanarrative, individual, postmodernism, reflexivity, epistemology, Enlightenment, modernity, holistic. In advancing a critical examination of post-processualism, the thesis has – as its central aim – the repositioning of the Neolithic within contemporary archaeological theory. Whilst acknowledging the insights it brings to an understanding of the period, it is argued that the knowledge it produces is necessarily constrained by the emphasis it accords to the cultural. Thus, in terms of the transition, the symbolic reading of agriculture to construct a metanarrative of Mesolithic continuity is challenged through a consideration of the evidential base and the indications it gives for a corresponding movement at the level of the economy; whilst the limiting effects generated by an interpretative reading of its monuments for an understanding of the social are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramics and Society in Northern Europe Southern Scandinavia And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CLoK Ceramics and Society in Northern Europe Johannes Müller and Rick Peterson Southern Scandinavia and Northern Germany Johannes Müller The origins of pottery in Southern Scandinavia and Northern Germany The earliest types of pottery in Southern Scandinavia and Northern Central Europe have different origins and histories of development. On typological grounds we are dealing both with pottery in a late Mesolithic context (late Ertebølle c. 4300 cal BC onwards) and pottery associated with Neolithic ways of life (TRB, or Funnel Beaker, societies starting c. 4100 cal BC) (Fischer and Kristiansen 2002; Jöns et al. 2009; Klassen 2004). The relation and origin of both is a focus of debate: while Ertebølle ceramics were seen traditionally to reflect southern influences from contemporary early horticulturalists on the Nordic Mesolithic foragers, some researchers are modelling different origins for Ertebølle and TRB assemblages. Ertebølle pottery is associated with Mesolithic/Epipalaeolithic pottery traditions, stretching from central Siberia to Brittany (Jordan and Zvelebil 2009; Matiskainen 2011; Andersen 2011; Piezonka 2011). The use of pointed-bottomed vessels is known from foraging societies which integrated some domesticates and cultivates into their economy but did not change in principle their foraging identity. No pottery or other imports imply any kind of innovative southern influences on this development; rather ceramics are seen as an independent innovation. By contrast, Funnel Beaker pottery is associated with changes related to the spread of horticulture into the North European Plain, enhanced by the expansion of an enclosure building society from the west (early Michelsberg of the Paris Basin and the Rhinelands) and late Lengyel developments within south-eastern horticultural communities (e.g., Gatersleben groups of the Middle-Elbe-Saale region).
    [Show full text]
  • Dating Balbirnie | 51
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 140 (2010), 51–77 DATING BALBIRNIE | 51 Dating Balbirnie: recent radiocarbon dates from the stone circle and cairn at Balbirnie, Fife, and a review of its place in the overall Balfarg/Balbirnie site sequence Alex Gibson* To the memory of Graham Ritchie ABSTRACT The interpretation of the sequence at the Balbirnie stone circle and cairn was based largely on stratigraphy and the then-perceived chronology of ceramic styles. An increased radiocarbon database and the facility to date cremated bone have now allowed the sequence at this site to be refined and reinterpreted. The construction of the stone circle can be demonstrated to have begun 1,000 years earlier than originally reported and the stone circle can be shown to have been in use for over 1,500 years. These new data, as well as an increased and growing amount of research on later Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age ritual monuments in Britain as a whole, has further allowed the position of this site within the Balfarg/Balbirnie ritual complex to be reconsidered and as a result it is possible to suggest a revised sequence for the complex. INTRODUCTION burials added to the circle or was the circle built to enclose an existing cemetery? Even The dating of stone circles is fraught with in the case of circles with central cairns, the problems. Unlike the posts of timber circles, exact sequence may not be discernable until stones cannot themselves be dated by radio- excavation. Thus at Balbirnie, Fife, Graham carbon. Even the integrity of organics from Ritchie (1974) concluded that the stone the stoneholes needs strict scrutiny as residual circle was the primary monument, whilst at material can easily become incorporated into Tomnaverie, Aberdeenshire, Richard Bradley the backfill and intrusive material can work (2005) demonstrated the reverse sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply and Demand in Prehistory? Economics of Neolithic Mining in Northwest Europe
    1 Supply and demand in prehistory? Economics of Neolithic mining in northwest Europe Peter Schauer1, Stephen Shennan1*, Andrew Bevan1, Gordon Cook2, Kevan Edinborough1, Ralph Fyfe3, Tim Kerig4 and Mike Parker Pearson1 *Corresponding author 1 Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK 2 Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, UK 3 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK 4 Universität Leipzig, Historisches Seminar, Lehrstuhl für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Ritterstr. 14, 04109 Leipzig, DE Abstract The extent to which non-agricultural production in prehistory had cost-benefit motivations has long been a subject of discussion. This paper addresses the topic by looking at the evidence for Neolithic quarrying and mining in Britain and continental northwest Europe and asks whether changing production through time was influenced by changing demand. Radiocarbon dating of mine and quarry sites is used to define periods of use. These are then correlated with a likely first-order source of demand, the size of the regional populations around the mines, inferred from a radiocarbon-based population proxy. There are significant differences between the population and mine-date distributions. Analysis of pollen data using the REVEALS method to reconstruct changing regional land cover patterns shows that in Britain activity at the mines and quarries is strongly correlated with evidence for forest clearance by incoming Neolithic populations, suggesting that mine and quarry production were a response to the demand that this created. The evidence for such a correlation between mining and clearance in continental northwest Europe is much weaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Portals by Sergey Smelyakov [email protected]
    The Stone Portals by Sergey Smelyakov [email protected] This issue starts hosting of English edition of the e-book The Stone Portals (http://www.astrotheos.com/EPage_Portal_HOME.htm). The first Chapter presents the classification and general description of the stone artefacts which are considered the stone portals: stone – for their substance, and portals – for their occult destination. Their main classes are the pyramids, cromlechs, and stone mounds, as well as lesser forms – stone labyrinths et al. Then, chapter by chapter, we analyze the classes of these artefacts from the viewpoint of their occult and analytical properties, which, as it turned out, in different regions of the world manifest the similar properties in astronomical alignments, metrological and geometrical features, calendaric application, and occult destination. The second Chapter deals with the first, most extensive class of the Stone Portals – the Labyrinth- Temples presented by edifices of various types: Pyramids, mounds, etc. This study is preceded by an overview of astronomic and calendaric concepts that are used in the subsequent analysis. The religious and occult properties are analyzed relative to the main classes of the Labyrinth-Temples disposed in Mesoamerica and Eurasia, but from analytical point of view the main attention is devoted to Mesoamerican pyramids and European Passage Mounds. Thus a series of important properties are revealed re to their geometry, geodesy, astronomy, and metrology which show that their builders possessed extensive knowledge in all these areas. At this, it is shown that although these artefacts differ in their appearance, they have much in common in their design detail, religious and occult destination, and analytic properties, and on the world-wide scale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dead of Stonehenge
    The dead of Stonehenge Christie Willis1, Peter Marshall2, Jacqueline McKinley3, Mike Pitts4, Joshua Pollard5, Colin Richards6, Julian Richards7, Julian Thomas6, Tony Waldron1, Kate Welham8 & Mike Parker Pearson1,∗ Research The assemblage of Neolithic cremated human remains from Stonehenge is the largest in Britain, and demonstrates that the monument was closely associated with the dead. New radiocarbon dates and Bayesian analysis indicate that cremated remains were deposited over a period of around five centuries from c. 3000–2500 BC. Earlier cremations were placed within or beside the Aubrey Holes that had held small bluestone standing stones during the first phase of the Stonehenge monument; later cremations were placed in London the peripheral ditch, perhaps signifying the N 0km400 transition from a link between specific dead individuals and particular stones, to a more diffuse collectivity of increasingly long-dead ancestors. Keywords: Stonehenge, Late Neolithic–Early Bronze Age, cremation, Bayesian dating Introduction Stonehenge, a Late Neolithic–Early Bronze Age monument in Wiltshire, southern England, was constructed in five stages between around 3000 BC and 1500 BC (Darvill et al. 2012). The first stage consisted of a circular ditch enclosing pits thought to have held posts or standing stones, of which the best known are the 56 Aubrey Holes. These are now believed to have held a circle of small standing stones, specifically ‘bluestones’ from Wales (Parker Pearson et al. 2009: 31–33). In its second stage, Stonehenge took on the form in
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery & Excavation in Scotland
    1991 DISCOVERY & EXCAVATION IN SCOTLAND An Annual Survey of Scottish Archaeological Discoveries. Excavation and Fieldwork EDITED BY COLLEEN E BATEY WITH JENNIFER BALL PUBLISHED BY THE COUNCIL FOR SCOTTISH ARCHAEOLOGY ISBN 0 901352 11 X ISSN 0419 -411X NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS 1 Contributions should be brief statements of work undertaken. 2 Each contribution should be on a separate page, typed or clearly hand-written and double spaced. Surveys should be submitted in summary form. 3 Two copies of each contribution are required, one for editing and one for NMRS. 4 The Editor reserves the right to shorten published contributions. The unabridged copy will be lodged with NMRS. 5 No proofs will be sent to Contributors because of the tight timetable and the cost. 6 Illustrations should be forwarded only by agreement with the Editor (and HS, where applicable). Line drawings should be supplied camera ready to suit page layout as in this volume. 7 Enquiries relating to published items should normally be directed to the Contributor, not the Editor. 8 The final date for receipt of contributions each year is 31 October, for publication on the last Saturday of February following. Contributions from current or earlier years may be forwarded at any time. 9 Contributions should be sent to Hon Editor, Discouery & Excavation in Scotland, CSA, c/o Royal Museum of Scotland, Queen Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1JD. Please use the following format:- REGION DISTRICT Site Name ( parish) Contributor Type of Site/Find NCR (2 letters, 6 figures) Report Sponsor: HS, Society, Institution, etc, as appropriate. Name of Contributor: (where more than one, please indicate which name should appear in the list of contributors) Address of main contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Prehistoric Enclosures: Empty Spaces/Busy Places Chapter Author(S): Kenneth Brophy
    University of London Press Institute of Historical Research Chapter Title: Urban prehistoric enclosures: empty spaces/busy places Chapter Author(s): Kenneth Brophy Book Title: Empty Spaces Book Subtitle: Perspectives on emptiness in modern history Book Editor(s): Courtney J. Campbell, Allegra Giovine, Jennifer Keating Published by: University of London Press, Institute of Historical Research. (2019) Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvp2n2r8.15 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms This book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. University of London Press, Institute of Historical Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Empty Spaces This content downloaded from 130.209.28.138 on Thu, 07 May 2020 09:10:55 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 8. Urban prehistoric enclosures: empty spaces/busy places* Kenneth Brophy The archaeology of emptiness What does emptiness mean to archaeologists? Actually, emptiness is something we are used to. We work within lengthy timescales of centuries or even thousands of years and the majority of this, like the inside of an atom, is empty space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stonehenge Carvings
    The Stonehenge Carvings Joan Rankin James Matthews Lloyd Matthews © 2015 Lloyd H. Matthews, Joan Rankin and James Matthews All rights reserved Page 1 of 93 With appreciation to Carrie I who inspired this paper, and with special thanks to Joan, who co-authored it with the support of her Aunt, Dorothy Whitfield and to James Matthews whose critical eye was invaluable. ..... and much love to Susanna for her patience and support I Carolyn J. Clark-Peck, Curator of Education, 35 Maryhill Museum Drive, Goldendale, WA 98620 [email protected] www.maryhillmuseum.org Page 2 of 93 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Early Calendars and Early Man 5 The Development of Early Man 5 The Acquisition of Astronomical Knowledge 11 The Early Lunar Tally – 30,000 BCE 12 The Lascaux Caves – 17,300 BCE 14 The Warren Field Calendar – 8000 BCE 14 Constellation and Stars 17 Astro-archaeology and the Earth's Wobble 19 The Southern Cross and the Equinoxes 20 Sirius and Equinoxes 26 How Sirius could have been used to mark the start of Spring and Autumn 27 Orion, Solstices and Station Stones 91/92 31 Hercules, Solstices and Station Stones 93/94 33 Stonehenge - A Timepiece of the Stars 36 The Aubrey Hole circle 37 A Brief Background 37 The Aubrey Hole Circle 40 How the Aubrey Holes were used 41 Carvings on the Stones 44 Trilithon 52 - The Hidden 'Eye' 44 Trilithon 53 - The 'Divider' 45 Dividing the Day 45 Dividing Opinions 46 Dividing the lunar/solar years 47 Fallen Trilithon 59 - The 'Parallels' 50 Trilithon 58 – The Lost Symbol 54 Keeping track of thousands of days, the Aubrey Hole way 56 And In Conclusion ….
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Historical Society
    SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND Proceedings Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Vol. 127 (1997) Saville, A., Palaeolithic handaxes in Scotland. Alexander, D., Excavation of pits containing decorated Neolithic pottery and early lithic material of possible Mesolithic date at Spurryhillock, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire. Rideout, J.S., Excavation of Neolithic enclosures at Cowie Road, Bannockburn, Stirling, 1984-85. Pollard, T., Excavation of a Neolithic settlement and ritual complex at Beckton farm, Lockerbie, Dumfries & Galloway. Masters, L., The excavation and restoration of the Camster Long chambered cairn, Caithness, Highland, 1967-80. Johnston, D.A., Biggar Common, 1987-93: an early prehistoric funerary and domestic landscape in Clydesdale, South Lanarkshire. Rees, T., The excavation of Cairnwell ring-cairn, Portlethen, Aberdeenshire. Mercer, R.J.; Midgley, M.S., The early Bronze Age cairn at Sketewan, Balnaguard, Perth & Kinross. Pollock D., The excavation of Iron Age buildings at Ironshill, Inverkeilor, Angus. Murray, D., Ralston, I., The excavation of a square-ditched barrow and other cropmarks at Boysack Mills, Inverkeilor, Angus. Crone, A.; O’Sullivan, J., Excavation of a cropmark enclosure at Brixwold, Dalhousie mains, Bonnyrigg, Midlothian. Hingley, R. et al., The excavation of two later Iron Age fortified homesteads at Aldclune, Blair Atholl, perth & Kinross. Crawford, J., Archaeological collections from sandhill sites in the Isle of Coll, Argyll & Bute. Hunter, F., Iron Age coins in Scotland. Bateson, J.D.; McQ Holmes, N.M., Roman and medieval coins founding Scotland, 1988-95. Woolisfroft, D.J.; Hoffmann, B., The Roman Gask System tower at Greenloaning, Perth & Kinross. Bailey, G.B., Excavation of Roman, medieval and later features at Carriden Roman fort annexe in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations in the Ceremonial Complex of the Fourth to Second Millennium BC at Balfarg/Balbirnie, Glenrothes, Fife
    Proc Antiqc So Scot, (1993)3 12 , 43-210, fiche 1:A4-D4 Excavation ceremoniae th n si l comple fourte th f xho secono t d millennium B Ct Balfarg/Balbirniea , Glenrothes, Fife Edited by Gordon J Barclay* & Christopher J Russell-Whitef From texreportd an t s prepare : Gordodby nBarclayJ , Lin Barnetson, Jaqueline Birnie, Gordon Cook, Trevor Cowie, Magnar Dalland, Jane Downes, Alan Fairweather, Audrey Henshall, David Hogg, David Jordan McCullaghd ,Ro , Valerie McLellan, Brian Moffat, David Reed, Colin Richards, Christophe Russell-WhiterJ , lan Shepherd, Helen Smith, NicholaP s Tavene Carolind ran e Wickham-Jones 'Perfection obtainto such in once,at powerbodymen the any of inquiries in of not is whatever may be the extent of their views or the vigour of their exertions.' (Baile Culley& y 1805) ABSTRACT The portions Balfarg/Balbirniethe of ceremonial complex excavated between 1983 1985and are described related portionsand the previously:to dug Balbirnie stone circle Balfargand henge. The prehistoric ceremonial use of the area seems to have lasted from early in the third millennium until second the late in millennium terms(in uncalibratedof BC radiocarbon dates). sequenceThe began with diggingpit potteryand deposition site, partsthe two of in near Balfarg Riding School (BRS) and to the west of the Balfarg henge. Then, two timber structures, possibly with a mortuary function, were erected at BRS, probably in the early/mid third millennium (uncalibrated).moundedwas BC two overlaterthe surrounded The and of by a circular ditched enclosure (a henge?); this activity was associated with the deposition of Grooved Ware. At about the same time, at the west end of the site, a similar deposition of burnt and broken Grooved Ware predates the construction of the Balfarg henge, with its timber stoneand circles, there and evidence is Balbirnie firstof the of use the stone circle.
    [Show full text]