DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Operative Program the Bjelovar-Bilogora County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Operative Program the Bjelovar-Bilogora County REGIONAL OPERATIVE PROGRAM THE BJELOVAR-BILOGORA COUNTY Draft Bjelovar, June 2006. 2. Basic analysis 2.1. Introduction In this portion, an overview, and the basic features of the county territory, environment, infrastructure, human and natural potentials, economic, social, administrative and business potentials of the county will be shown. The analysis is made based on available data, with the goal of insuring a high-quality foundation for ascertaining basic characteristics of life in the county and defining upcoming steps in strategies, priorities and measures for the future development of the County. Subsequently, the county resources are processed under the following headings: 1. Geographical position 2. Natural resources 3. Population and urban network 4. Administrative-territorial organization of the county 5. Transportation infrastructure 6. Communal infrastructure 7. Economy 8. Social infrastructure 9. Summary 2.2. Geographical position The Bjelovar-bilogora county, geographically speaking, belongs to the area of the Panonian (and peripanonian) mega region, mostly part of the macro region of the North Croatian outlet, and it partly borders with the macro region of the Slavonian boulder mountain range. It covers the area of four characteristic geographic entities: Bilogora (north and northeast), the edges of the Papuk and Ravna mountain ranges (east), the Moslavacka mountain range (southwest), and the Pleistocene prairies and Cesma and Ilova valleys (west, central and south). As far as the area of function is concerned, the Bjelovar-bilogora County is located in the eastern part of the group of counties of Central Croatia, the most developed area of Croatia and the key intersection of European and regional transportation routes. However, taking into account the borderline location (in regard to the group of eastern Croatian counties), and the position right between the most important transportation routes (Posavski and Podravski corridor, and the perpendicular corridor of Central Europe-Adriatic Coast, and Podunavlje- Adriatic Coast), it has stayed partially separate from the development plans, which was best seen after the interruption of secondary traffic routes connecting the north and south of Croatia through Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is one of two counties that doesn’t border with another country or with areas close to the national border. The Bjelovar-bilogora county borders: - on the north – with the Koprivnica-Krizevci county - on the north-east – with the Virovitica-podravina county - on the south-east – with the Pozega-slavonia county - on the south-west – with the Sisak-moslavina county - on the west – with the Zagreb county With an area of 2636.67km2 (4.66% of the area of the Republic of Croatia) and 133084 inhabitants (3% of the Croatian population), it is one of the mid-sized counties. 2.3. Natural resources 2.3.1. Relief and climate The basic characteristics of any landscape, including the landscape of the area of the Bjelovar- bilogora County, are given by a relief map. It’s dissection and indifferentiation define the basic predisposition on which the other landscape components are built onto – vegetation, hydrographic and anthropogenic influence. The county has a mostly sloped relief. Within that morphogenetic type, the eruptive- metamorphic complex of the Moslavacka gora differed, and the relief was created by an oleic accumulation that has all the features of the sloped relief. The majority of valleys, which are the consequence of more recent radial ground movements and surface flooding, have reflected themselves in the great meaning and complex character of water. In the extensive water issue, there are important questions about the easement of subsurface valleys and water supply. Within the entire zone of parapodalistic rocks, hydrogenation of the earth is a common appearance, occurring alongside larger rivers. Due to the intense hydrogenation, the soil isn’t usable for intensive agricultural production, so ameliorative procedures are necessary. The majority of parapodalistic soil, which coincides with higher zones, is of good quality and has relatively few limitations as far as choice of culture is concerned, so they are foreseen as the main zones of intensive farming. The highest portions of the County are, and will remain, forested areas. The natural features are diverse, and they give the entire county area a special appearance and offer the opportunity of economic development. The valleys alongside the rivers Cesma and Ilova, and their streams, are economically opportune. The general climatic features are a reflection of the County position and its openness towards the northeast. The consequence of that is a greater effect of the continental climate (lower winter temperatures, less precipitation, significant winds from the N and NE). 2.3.2. Soil An important natural resource of the Bjelovar-bilogora County is fertile soil, that is, arable agricultural area. With its area of 263919 ha, the Bjelovar-bilogora County accounts for 4.66% of the total area of the Republic of Croatia. The majority of the county (57.9%) is agricultural land spreading over an area of 152290 ha (5% of the total agricultural land in Croatia), of which a very large percentage, 94.7% or 144725 ha, is arable land, which accounts for 7.8% of the arable land in the Republic of Croatia. The geomorphic group of soils, or the litho-geological, relief and hydrological characteristics of the soil, along with the present climate conditions significantly affect the widespread vegetation and the way of using the land. It is important, because of that, to use individual areas, that is, to raise cultures that have a predisposition to the soil in question, and to prevent the irrational or inappropriate use of the most valuable agricultural land for other purposes. Valuable arable soil Valuable arable soil has relatively few restrictions for field production of plants. Level and slightly slanted (up to 5%) loamy soils can be included in this group of soils. Watering is minimal on these soils, and they hold little water. The physical characteristics of the soil for water are mostly good. Because of a significant appearance of dust and an increased packing of soil under the ground level, loosening of the soil is needed. The soil is very appropriate for field production of plants. Moisture deficit appears often in the summer months. With a watering system, regular agro-technical measures and sporadic drainage, this soil could provide varied, high-quality, stable production. Man has a lot of influence on the development of these soils. Human action is especially emphasized nowadays, and larger anthropic effects are expected in the future, because more significant interventions are expected. Many anthropic procedures changed the soil of this area. Forest clearing and soil processing, especially on slanted lands, lead to the washing away of soil, to the process of erosion. Some individual vineyards have changes in soil so radical, that they have completely lost the typical land characteristics of their area. Regulation of the water situation in the area lead to significant changes in the irrigation regime of soils in the flatlands, especially in river valleys. By raising the levees, and the deepening, widening and corrugating the flow of the Ilova, Cesma, and some of the adjacent waterways, the real danger of flooding in the area has been removed, or at least significantly decreases. If the area did flood, the water would spend less time on the soil, because the defined measures would be used to speed up the evacuation of the surplus water, which is beneficial for the soil and vegetation (meadows). 2.3.3. Forests The Bjelovar-bilogora County has an extremely balanced relationship between area, quality and condition of forests and forestland, even a balanced area layout. A forested area of 36% of the total county area qualifies the area as mid-forested. In relation to the total area of the county of 263667 hectare, forests cover 95455 hectares, which represents a 36% forest covering of the county, which is the same percentage that the Republic of Croatia has. The total forested area of the county accounts for 4.6% of the total forested area in the Republic of Croatia. Forests are a significant national treasure, and have been systematically monitored for over a century. The beginning of organized forestry in the Bjelovar-Podravina region, and so in the Bjelovar-bilogora County, was in 1874. That year, the Durdevac and Krizevci property offices, based in Bjelovar, were established, and they managed the woods. The property office in Durdevac controlled 39562 ha, the Krizevci property office controlled 29 320 ha, while the government controlled the remaining 39 160 ha of forests. At the end of the 19th century in the Bjelovar-Krizevci County, a total of 84.5% of workers were directly employed in the exploitation of the forests, and not a single lumber mill nor wood product company existed at the time. That state caused the ruin of the forest treasure. Lumber was exported to France, Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Czech Republic, Italy and other countries as a raw material, and rarely as a finished product. Today, of the total forested area in the county, government owned forests, managed by “Hrvatske Sume”, with 10 branches (Bjelovar, Cazma, Ivanska, Garesnica, Daruvar, Sirac, Dulovac, Grubisno Polje, Veliki Grdevac, Velika Pisanica within the framework of the Head office in Bjelovar), amount to 83 255 ha, while privately owned forests are represented by the unreliable number of 12 200 ha. It should be emphasised that privately owned forests, fragmented and devastated, aren’t even close to the quality of those owned by “Hrvatske Sume”. The majority of privately owned forests have been transformed into forests of low growth, or tree stumps, which are used for the production of firewood. There are also acacia forests, which are clear-cut every 4 to 5 years for vineyard posts, and they also renew themselves through tree stumps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Identitet, Stradanje, Sjećanje I Asimilacija Srba Na Području Grubišnog Polja I Bjelovara FILIP ŠKILJAN Institut Za Migracije I Narodnosti, Zagreb
    IZVORNI ZNANSTVENI RAD DOI: https://doi.org/10.52328/t.4.1.1 / PRIMLJENO: 19. prosinca 2020. Identitet, stradanje, sjećanje i asimilacija Srba na području Grubišnog Polja i Bjelovara FILIP ŠKILJAN Institut za migracije i narodnosti, Zagreb Autor na temelju usmenih iskaza prikupljenih na terenu na području Bilogore između Bjelovara i Grubišnog Polja i objavljene literature, donosi informacije o nekim bitnim identitetskim obilježjima Srba koji žive na tom području (običaji oko rođenja djeteta, vjenčanja, smrti, o vjerskim običajima i krsnim slavama). Potom istražuje koji su faktori utjecali u socijalističkom razdoblju na povećanu asimilaci- ju Srba (antifašistička borba i sjećanje na nju, jugoslavenstvo, ateizacija i slično). Posebno se bavi sjećanjima na prošli, Domovinski rat (1991. — 1995.) i na stradanja stanovništva Grubišnog Polja i bjelovarskog kraja u tome ratu. KLJUČNE RIJEČI: Grubišno Polje; Bjelovar; Bilogora; identitet; asimilacija; Srbi; pravoslavna vjeroispovijest Kratki povijesni uvod – fragmenti povijesti Srba na području Bilogore kao temelj identiteta Geografski okvir odručje Grubišnog Polja i Bjelovara nalazi se pod južnim obroncima Bilo- Pgore. Radi se o mikroregiji Bjelovarske kotline i Bilogore kojima pripadaju općine Veliki Grđevac, Velika Pisanica, Veliko Trojstvo, Zrinski Topolovac, Šan- drovac, Nova Rača, Rovišće i Kapela te gradovi Bjelovar i Grubišno Polje. Na sjeveru je granica ovog područja prema Podravini sljeme Bilogore, na istoku je granica prijelaz Bilogore u Papuk, na zapadu je granica rijeka Velika, a na jugu je granica prema Moslavini rijeka Česma i u jednom dijelu rijeka Ilova. filip škiljan Identitet, stradanje, sjećanje i asimilacija Srba 7 Prvi preci današnjih Srba u sjeverozapadnoj Hrvatskoj Prvi preci današnjih Srba na području sjeverozapadne Hrvatske, odnosno u Kraljevini Slavoniji, naseljavaju se već u 15.
    [Show full text]
  • February 13, 1992 Volume 4, Issue 4
    February 13, 1992 Volume 4, Issue 4 His Excellency Franjo Tudjman President of the Republic of Croatia Radi ev Trg 2 41000 Zagreb Croatia Dear President Tudjman: The U.S. Helsinki Watch Committee is deeply concerned by reports of serious human rights abuses by forces responsible to the Croatian government and by individual extremists in Croatia. Our own investigations of these reports, conducted during a series of fact-finding missions to Croatia in the past year, indicate that many of these reports are well-founded. We call upon you to investigate the abuses enumerated in this letter and to punish those responsible for them. We call upon you to take immediate measures to ensure that such violations of human rights do not occur again. The abuses described in this letter include violations of the laws of war in the current conflict between Croatian and Serbian forces and the Yugoslav army, including the summary execution of civilians and disarmed combatants; the torture and mistreatment of detainees; arbitrary arrests and disappearances; destruction of civilian property and the killing of journalists covering the war. In addition to violations connected with the war, Helsinki Watch has also documented restrictions on freedom of expression and the press and interference with the independence of the judiciary. Finally, we are gravely concerned about the harassment, discrimination and rising violence against Serbs not engaged in the armed conflict in Croatia. Rules of War Violations in Croatia by Croatian Forces Violations of the rules of war are often committed by local police officers and members of the Croatian army1 in areas which are under heavy siege by Serbian forces and the Yugoslav army.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Outturns of Croatian Municipalities, Cities and Counties for 20151
    NEWSLETTER Zagreb l Smičiklasova 21 doi: 10.3326/nle.2016.108 [email protected] l www.ijf.hr l tel: +385(0)1 4886 444 No. 108 l November 2016 l ISSN 1848-4662 Budget outturns of Croatian municipalities, cities and counties for 20151 KATARINA OTT, MIHAELA BRONIĆ, BRANKO STANIĆ This article aims to provide a simple presentation of basic data on the budget outturns of Croatian local government units in 2015.2 It includes synthesized tables based on the Ministry of Finance's database, showing revenues and expenditures3, as well as surpluses or deficits (in per capita and total terms). Also presented are data on the populations4 and levels of budget transparency in all the local government units5. This analysis and the tables additionally provided in the Excel format, allow all interested parties to get acquainted with the financial condition of their respective local government units in 2015 and make relevant comparisons with the situation in 20146. While the Ministry of Finance does publish budget outturns for all local government units7, they are in the form of oversized Excel tables, with the cities and municipalities arranged by county. Given the large number of local government units (whose complete budgets are presented), the navigation through these tables and comparison across the local units is often difficult. This article gives the reader a snapshot of the basic financial condition of the local government units in 2015, while more detailed information can be found on the Ministry of Finance’s and local government units’ websites. Nevertheless, some notes may be necessary for a proper understanding of the presented data.
    [Show full text]
  • Podravina PODRAVINA Volumen 16, Broj 31, Str
    148 Podravina PODRAVINA Volumen 16, broj 31, Str. 148 - 162 Koprivnica 2017. PRIRODNOGEOGRAFSKE ZNAČAJKE BJELOVARSKO- BILOGORSKE ŽUPANIJE U FUNKCIJI RAZVOJA TURIZMA NATURAL-GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF BJELOVAR-BILOGORA COUNTY IN THE FUNCTION OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT Nina LONČAR Primljeno/Received: 11. 11. 2016. Kristina ŽGANJER Prihvaćeno/Accepted: 5. 6. 2017. Sveučilište u Zadru Prethodno priopćenje Odjel za geografiju Preliminary communication Zadar UDK/UDC 338.486(497.5-35Bjelovar) [email protected] 332.1:911.3 SAŽETAK Bjelovarsko-bilogorska županija smještena je u Središnjoj hrvatskoj zavali te ima povolj- ne prirodnogeografske uvjete za razvoj turizma. Županija ima dobar geoprometni položaj PRIRODNOGEOGRAFSKE ZNAČAJKE BJELOVARSKO-BILOGORSKE ŽUPANIJE prema najvećoj urbanoj aglomeraciji koja je ujedno i najveće turističko središte kontinen- talne Hrvatske. Usprkos bogatoj i raznolikoj prirodnogeografskoj samo je zdravstveno-lje- čilišni turizam sustavno razvijan od druge polovice 20. stoljeća, a sve veća važnost pridaje se lovnom i ruralnom turizmu. Za potrebe istraživanja provedeno je kvantitativno anketno N. LONČAR - istraživanje na neprobabilistički odabranom, prigodnom uzorku koji čine građani Republike Hrvatske sa stalnim prebivalištem na području Bjelovarsko-bilogorske županije i oni koji nemaju stalno prebivalište na području Bjelovarsko-bilogorske županije. Na temelju rezul- tata ankete i analize statističkih podataka utvrđeno je da su posjetitelji uglavnom zadovoljni cjelokupnom turističkom ponudom, no nedostaje im više manifestacija
    [Show full text]
  • Ekonomska I Turistička Škola Daruvar
    SCHOOL OF ECONOMY AND TOURISM DARUVAR Ministry of Tourism Republic of Croatia CUP OF JOY IDEA • Students of our school have been creating travel brochures as a part of their curriculum for a long time. • Goran Bence suggested promoting Daruvar and Bjelovar and Bilogora County in a new way. His idea was that students create a brochure, and he will travel accross Europe an spread the word about Daruvar. MINISTRY OF TOURISM REPUBLIC OF CROATIA • After the announcement by the Ministry of Tourism: "Promoting and strengthening the competencies of vocational interest in tourism", our ideas could be realised. • We completed the forms and waited for the results. • After approval of our project we started the activities. ACTIVITIES • Our 4th grade Tourism students designed the brochure ”Daruvar – Cup of Joy”. • The brochure was originally written in the Croatian language, after which the students translated it into English. • The brochure contains the most important attractions and events, cultural and gastronomic, in Daruvar and in its surroundings. ACTIVITIES • The project has been promoted on the Cvjetni trg in Zagreb, 21 May 2016. • To promote the project, the students created a poster about the project, and they distributed the brochures. ACTIVITIES • Depaprture was on 5 July 2016. Students prepared over 3000 brochures for him to take to Europe. • We have prepared the snacks and the farewell party. • Everything was covered by the media ACTIVITIES • During Goran's travels, all the activities were posted on web and facebook pages. • We created the interactive map of Europe, to make it easier to keep track of where Goran is currently located.
    [Show full text]
  • Grubišno Polje CRO Grubišno Bih SER Polje MN MAC
    BUSINESS FRIENDLY MUNICIPALITY SOUTH EAST EUROPE Grubišno Polje CRO Grubišno BiH SER Polje MN www.grubisnopolje.hr MAC Location Croatia, 45°42’N 17°10’E Border Crossings Hungary (44 km), Bosnia and Herzegovina (92 km) Population 6.478 Territory 269 km²; 31,6% arable land, 41,6% forests, 26,8% roads and other Budget € 3,46 million, 16,61% of capital investments Contact Trg Bana Josipa Jelačića 1, 43.290 Grubišno Polje, +385 43 448 210, [email protected] The City of Grubišno Polje is located in the northeast part of Vienna (358 km) the Bjelovarsko – Bilogorska County, on the slopes of Bilogora Budapest (291 km) mountain. Its economic development is based on the efforts towards strengthening competitiveness, improving the social and utility infrastructure, raising the quality of life, human resources development and the improvement of demographic trends. Zagreb (125 km) The city established its business zone in 2002 and following two GRUBIŠNO POLJE expansions, the zone now covers 72.29 hectares, intended for small and medium enterprises. The zone has 27 SME parcels, of which Milan (766 km) 13 are occupied (21.73 ha) by 10 entrepreneurs operating in metal, Belgrade (350 km) stone, asphalt, firewood industry, energy and waste management, and others. The remaining parcels are currently available for sale. The developed utility infrastructure includes the water supply Sofia (740 km) system, drainage system, gasification system, electrical supply, waste disposal. For investors engaged in production activities and Sarajevo (359 km) Istanbul giving priority to local population in the employment process, the (1.299 km) city offers concrete support measures aimed at creating favorable conditions within its SME Zone, including the low price of land, Thessaloniki (991 km) possibility of using cheaper thermal energy, and 100% exemption from the municipal contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Heritage Sites in Croatia, 2005
    JEWISH HERITAGE SITES IN CROATIA PRELIMINARY REPORT United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Fayetteville, NY Staff: Michael B. Levy Jeffrey L. Farrow Washington, DC Executive Director Rachmiel Liberman Samuel D. Gruber Brookline, MA Research Director Laura Raybin Miller Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Hollywood, FL Program Manager Vincent Obsitnik Peachtree City, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: (202) 254-3824 Fax: (202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] October 10, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust. The atheistic Communist Party dictatorships that succeeded the Nazis throughout most of the region were insensitive to American Jewish concerns about the preservation of the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS General Assembly Security Council
    UNITED NATIONS AS General Assembly Distr. Security Council GENERAL A/48/623 S/26772 23 November 1993 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH GENERAL ASSEMBLY SECURITY COUNCIL Forty-eighth session Forty-eighth year Agenda item 79 REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECLARATION ON THE STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY Letter dated 19 November 1993 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Yugoslavia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to transmit herewith a letter from His Excellency Mr. Vladislav Jovanovic´, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, addressed to you (see annex). I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex circulated as an official document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 79, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Dragomir DJOKIC´ Ambassador Chargé d’affaires a.i. 93-65637 (E) 011293 /... A/48/623 S/26772 English Page 2 ANNEX Letter dated 15 November 1993 from the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia addressed to the Secretary-General Deeply alarmed by the activities carried out in the Republic of Croatia with a view to exterminating the Serb people in the region in violation of the provisions of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948, I have informed the competent bodies and commissions of the United Nations, as well as other international forums, about mass murders of Serbs, destruction of many Serb settlements and the ethnic cleansing of towns and villages with a mixed population (Zagreb, Osijek, Vinkovci, Novska, Slavonska Požega, Karlovac, Sisak, Varaždin, Daruvar, Virovitica, Bjelovar, Dubrovnik, Sibenik, Zadar and others, in some of which Serbs accounted for up to 41 per cent of the overall population, have now become almost ethnically "pure Croatian towns").
    [Show full text]
  • Stanovništvo Prema Starosti I Spolu Po Naseljima
    PRILOG 7 - Popis naselja u kojima je dozvoljeno ulaganje u smještajne objekte u sektoru ruralnog turizma skupina po Grad ili Broj indeksu Ime županije općina Ime grada/općine Ime naselja stanovnika razvijenosti Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Bastajski Brđani 0 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Batinjani 247 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Batinjska Rijeka 30 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Borova Kosa 91 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Dobra Kuća 15 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Donja Vrijeska 76 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Donje Cjepidlake 3 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Đulovac 957 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Gornja Vrijeska 42 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Gornje Cjepidlake 46 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Katinac 115 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Koreničani 246 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Kravljak 22 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Mala Babina Gora 32 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Mala Klisa 2 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Mali Bastaji 112 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Mali Miletinac 22 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Maslenjača 174 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Nova Krivaja 70 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Potočani 70 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Puklica 106 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Removac 19 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Stara Krivaja 0 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Škodinovac 35 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Velika Babina Gora 55 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Velika Klisa 0 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Veliki Bastaji 502 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Veliki Miletinac 59 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Đulovac Vukovije 97 I. Bjelovarsko-bilogorska Općina Zrinski Topolovac Jakopovac 138 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspektive Razvoja Ruralnog Turizma U Bjelovarsko- Bilogorskoj Županiji
    Perspektive razvoja ruralnog turizma u Bjelovarsko- bilogorskoj županiji Ćetković, Sara Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2018 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:842078 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-24 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb Sara Ćetković Perspektive razvoja ruralnog turizma u Bjelovarsko-bilogorskoj županiji Diplomski rad predan na ocjenu Geografskom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu radi stjecanja akademskog zvanja magistre geografije Zagreb 2018. Ovaj je diplomski rad izrađen u sklopu diplomskog sveučilišnog studija Geografija; smjer: baština i turizam pri Geografskom odsjeku Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, pod vodstvom izv. prof. dr. sc. Aleksandra Lukića. II TEMELJNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA KARTICA Sveučilište u Zagrebu Diplomski rad Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Geografski odsjek Perspektive razvoja ruralnog turizma u Bjelovarsko-bilogorskoj županiji Sara Ćetković Izvadak: Ruralni prostor Bjelovarsko-bilogorske županije u proteklom desetljeću kontinuirano bilježi porast broja dolazaka turista. Cilj ovog rada je detaljnom analizom turističke atrakcijske osnove prostora Bjelovarsko-bilogorske županije, analiziranjem postojećih oblika ruralnog turizma koji se razvijaju na promatranom
    [Show full text]
  • Toponymic Guidelines for Map and Other Editors – Croatia
    UNITED NATIONS E/CONF.98/CRP.74 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL 20 August 2007 Ninth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names New York, 21 - 30 August 2007 Item 9 (e) of the provisional agenda* National standardization: Toponymic guidelines for map editors and other editors Toponymic Guidelines for Map and Other Editors - Croatia Submitted by Croatia ** * E/CONF.98/1. ** Prepared by Dunja Brozović, Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistics and Zvonko Stefan, Croatian Geodetic Institute. TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS - CROATIA FOR INTERNATIONAL USE First Edition August 2007 Dunja Brozović Rončević (Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistics) and Zvonko Štefan (Croatian Geodetic Institute) Zagreb, Croatia 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Languages 1.1. General remarks 1.2. National language - Croatian 1.2.1. General remarks 1.2.2. The Croatian alphabet 1.2.3. Spelling rules for Croatian geographical names 1.2.3.1. Capitalization 1.2.3.2. Use of hyphens 1.2.3.3. Use of one or two words 1.2.4. Pronunciation of Croatian geographical names 1.2.5. Linguistic strata recognizable in Croatian place names 1.2.6. Croatian dialects 1.3. Minority languages 1.3.1. Serbian 1.3.1.1. General remarks 1.3.1.2. The Serbian alphabet 1.3.1.3. Geographical names 1.3.2. Italian 1.3.2.1. General remarks 1.3.2.2. The Italian alphabet 1.3.2.3. Geographical names 1.3.3. Hungarian 1.3.3.1. General remarks 1.3.3.2. The Hungarian alphabet 1.3.3.3.
    [Show full text]