Stabilizing Coastal Sand Dunes in the Pacific Northwesfgi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stabilizing Coastal Sand Dunes in the Pacific Northwesfgi S4Fík.^, United States Department of H Agriculture Stabilizing Coastal Sand Dunes Soil Conservation Service in the Pacific Northwesfgi V Agriculture (y Handbook 687 (/-' r r\> ' to CO o: . U3 33 CO ~J3 > fNi > ___ \<^^. 2r k 'JO o -< PRICE /V^ Cover: European beachgrass ¡s the dominant plant for stabilizing frontal dunes in the Pacific Northwest. Photo credits: All photographs were taken by Ron Nichols, pubfic affairs specialist (former photographer), Soil Conservation Service, ex- cept for the black and white historic photo- graphs. All programs and services of the U.S. Depart- ment OT Agriculture, Soil Conservation Ser- vice, are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap. August 1991 stabilizing Coastal Sand Dunes in the Pacific Northwest by Jack Carlson,' Frank Reckendorf,^ and Wilbur Ternyik' ' Plant materials specialist, Soil Conservation Service, West National Technical Center, Portland, Oregon. ^ Sedimentation geologist. Soil Conservation Service, West National Technical Center, Portland, Oregon. ^ Former plant materials technician. Soil Conservation Service, Plant Materials Nursery at Warrenton, Oregon; current nurseryman and private consultant. Wave Beachgrass Nursery, Florence, European beachgrass. Oregon. Contents Introduction 3 Marsh Habitats for Wet Interdune Areas 38 Extent and location of dunes 3 Description 38 Formation of dunes 5 Species and mixtures 38 The need for selective stabilization of dunes 8 Cover for Dredge Spoils 40 Planning a Dune Control Program 9 Approach 40 Land use 9 Species 40 Dune management areas 11 Mixtures 40 Site investigation 13 Maintenance 14 Case History: Warrenton Dune Control Project 41 Specifications 43 Sand-Stilling Dunegrasses for Initial Stabilization 15 Specifications for contracts 43 Species 15 Labor and equipment requirements 43 Unsuitable plants 18 Summary of recommended plant material 43 When to plant sand-stilling grasses 19 Planting stock 19 Literature Cited 48 Tools for planting 21 Methods of planting 21 Glossary 49 Fertilizing the plantings 22 Maintaining dunegrass stands 24 Appendixes 50 Establishing and maintaining a source of beachgrass 25 I Common and Scientific Plant Names Used in This Publication 50 II Beaches and Dunes Site Investigation Checklist 51 Permanent Cover 27 Species 27 List of Tables Native seed harvest 30 Table ^ Page Planting times and seed mixtures for grasses and legumes 30 1 Plants Not Recommended for Controlling Sand Seeding methods 32 Movement in Coastal Dune Areas 18 Fire control 32 2 Hill Spacing and Culms Per Acre for European Beachgrass 24 Woody plantings 33 3 Time Requirements or Work Rates for Three Types Planting methods 33 of Dune Stabilization Tasks 43 Maintenance 34 4 Basic Recommended Plant Material Chart for Dune Stabilization 44 Temporary Mechanical Aids 35 5 Transplants Needed with Varied Space Requirements 47 Landscape Plants for Stabilized Dunes 37 Ground covers 37 Medium shrubs 37 Trees 37 Introduction F Extent and Location of Dunes this publication draws upon the more than 50 years of infield dune The Pacific Northwest Coast is management experience of the U.S. defined as the area from Cape Department of Agriculture's Soil Mendocino, California, to the Strait Conservation Service (SCS). it re- of Juan de Fuca, Washington. This views fundamental dune-building area has a similar climate, vegeta- processes, describes how to plan a tion, soil, and geology, as well as dune-control program, and explains similar variation in wind and wave the mechanical aids, plants, and action. planting techniques for dune stabili- Many types of sand dunes and zation. sand spits, which make up 250,000 The recommendations in this acres of the Pacific Northwest coast, publication apply specifically to the provide exceptional recreational op- dune lands in the Pacific Northwest. portunities as well as rich habitat ar- Some of the plants, however, have eas for wildlife. Of the total dune been grown successfully as far north area, about 26,000 acres are dunes as Vancouver Island, Canada, and as with essentially no vegetation; and far south as Morrow Bay, California. of these, nearly 5,000 acres are "ac- (See appendix I for common and sci- tive" dunes that threaten competing entific plant names used in this pub- land uses. Active dunes, so called lication.) because they lack a stabilizing plant cover and are subject to extensive movement by wind action, advance onto forests, lakes, stream channels, roads, railroads, estuaries, and agri- cultural land. Every year several hundred acres of vegetated dune land are disturbed, mainly as a result of human activity, and become new active dunes. Landowners and community planners face the challenge of select- ing a dune stabilization plan that protects adjoining property and natural resources yet preserves suffi- cient open, active dune land for public recreation, aesthetics, and scientific purposes. To assist them. Typical dune development in early stages of natural revegetation. Residential and resort development are common on stabilized dunes, but vegetative cover must be maintained and managed to minimize sand deposition and damage to buildings. Building in beachgrass vegetation on or near foredunes is considerably more risky than further inland on much older stabilized dunes. Formation of Dunes break at an angle to the shoreline, from the northwest during the sum- Northwest coast. Their preliminary they generate a current that flows mer months. As a result, littoral drift results indicate longshore transport is changes direction from season to bounded by major headlands and is Coastal dune formation is deter- parallel to the shoreline (Komer season. highly correlated to the prevailing mined by four factors: wind action, 1976). This current, together with Recent work (Chesser and wave approach angle. They also wave action, vegetation, and source the waves, produces a transport of sand along the beach known as lit- Peterson 1987) based on physi- concluded that episodic events may of sand. The two immediate sources ographic and minéralogie analysis overshadow seasonal cycles of of dune sand particles are the ero- toral drift (Komer 1979). Winds and indicates that there are at least 1 7 transport. sion of coastal formations exposed to associated waves arrive from the major littoral cells along the Pacific wave attack, and sediment load from southwest during winter months and rivers. Ocean currents move sand from eroding headlands, and from the mouths of rivers, to where there are indentations in the coastline. As sand is deposited on beaches, it is exposed at low tide, dries quickly, is caught by the wind, and is carried inland. Along the Pacific coast there is almost always a moderate wind. At times the wind approaches hurri- cane force. High-velocity winds move enormous amounts of sand in- land. After a winter storm, rivers and streams carry a heavy load of sedi- -^ ments from the upper watershed. This sand is combined with that de- rived from storm waves attacking sea '^' . cliffs, dunes, and spits. These storms >/./*? provide a seasonal near-shore sand supply, whereas lower-energy waves and currents, which occur more on a continual basis, transport the near- shore sand to beaches and tidal in- lets (Peterson et al., 1982). Waves reaching the coast gener- ate longshore currents in the near- shore area that are important in the movement of sand along the beach and in beach erosion. When waves Dunes form and reform naturally or from human activities. Concentrated wind channels frequently create blowouts, or areas where wind removes existing vegetation. The three largest littoral cells are wind and trap the sand. Thus, in- associated with the three largest riv- stead of a hummocky landscape or a ers—the Columbia, the Umpqua, series of transverse and oblique and the Eel (Chesser and Peterson ridges of barren sand, a grassy 1987). Therefore, it is no surprise foredune develops parallel to the that some of the largest dune areas coastline (Cooper 1958). The great- occur in areas near these major riv- est amount of sand movement along ers. Jetty construction on the Pacific the North Pacific coast takes place Northwest coast also has a major ef- during the high-velocity winter wind fect on littoral sand drift and accu- storms. At this time sand engulfs the mulation. Sand accumulates on both foredune vegetation. During the the north and south sides of jetties spring and summer, however, veg- from the seasonally reversing waves. etation grows up through the sand Embankments, formerly at the mouth and forms a lush growth. This is cov- of rivers, are filled with sand. This ered again the next winter, and a sand accumulation can be quite fast, continuous sand ridge, built layer by such as behind the south jetty of the layer, extending without interrup- Columbia River. Between 1885 and tion, and parallel to the coastline, re- the 1930's, a prograding beach de- sults. The lands lying to the leeward veloped in this area, resulting in of the foredune are protected from 3,000 acres of open, active sand the scouring action of the sand-laden dunes. wind and a dense sod or forest cover Vegetation is a major factor af- eventually develops. fecting dune formation. Along a bar- If sand is deposited more rapidly ren shore, dunes are oriented than it is blown inland, the beach transversely or obliquely to the line will build oceanward. The veg- wind, depending on the existing etation will advance to a new storm wind regime. Prior to 1900,
Recommended publications
  • Review Article Biological Method in Stabilization of Sand Dunes Using the Ornamental Plants and Woody Trees: Review Article
    Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceuticals and Biological Sciences JIPBS www.jipbs.com ISSN: 2349-2759 Review article Biological method in stabilization of sand dunes using the ornamental plants and woody trees: Review article Metwally S.A.*1, Abouziena H.F.2, Bedour M.H. Abou- Leila3, M.M. Farahat1, E. El. Habba1 1Department of Ornamental Plants and Woody Trees, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, 12622. 2Department of Botany, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, 12622. 3 Department of Water Relation and Field irrigation, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, 12622. Abstract Sand dunes are considered one of the most obstacles that face the horizontal or vertical expansion of agriculture in the desert. Sand dunes are a collection of a loose grouping of sand on the land surface in the form of a pile with top. In the recent years, increasing attention has been taken to cultivate the timber trees and ornamental plants in a narrow range to combat the desertification, sand encroachment and sand dunes. The climate factors are characterized by high temperature, strong winds laden with sand and sandy dunes, lead to soil erosion and remove the fertility soil in the surface layer, and destroying cultivated lands. Therefore, it's important to planting windbreaks and stabilization sand dunes to reduce the damage and loss of all areas of development aspects. The methods used for combating the sand dunes can be classified into two types; biological methods or plant measure and the second are the mechanical methods or engineering measure. We will focus in this article on the biological methods where the trees, shrubs and grasses are planted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Dune Systems in Iran - Distribution and Activity
    Sand Dune Systems in Iran - Distribution and Activity. Wind Regimes, Spatial and Temporal Variations of the Aeolian Sediment Transport in Sistan Plain (East Iran) Dissertation Thesis Submitted for obtaining the degree of Doctor of Natural Science (Dr. rer. nat.) i to the Fachbereich Geographie Philipps-Universität Marburg by M.Sc. Hamidreza Abbasi Marburg, December 2019 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Christian Opp Physical Geography Faculty of Geography Phillipps-Universität Marburg ii To my wife and my son (Hamoun) iii A picture of the rock painting in the Golpayegan Mountains, my city in Isfahan province of Iran, it is written in the Sassanid Pahlavi line about 2000 years ago: “Preserve three things; water, fire, and soil” Translated by: Prof. Dr. Rasoul Bashash, Photo: Mohammad Naserifard, winter 2004. Declaration by the Author I declared that this thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. Hamidreza Abbasi iv List of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. General Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Introduction and justification ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CLATSOP COUNTY Scale in Mlles
    CLATSOP COUNTY Scale In Mlles 81 8 I A 0,6 O 6 Secmide 0 10 6 7 WASV INGTON T I L LAMOOK COUNTY CO Clatsop County Knappa Prairie U. S. Army Fort Stevens, Ruth C. Bishop Dean H. Byrd (1992) Janice M. Healy (1952) Oregon Burial Site Guide Clatsop County Area: 873 square miles Population (1998): 35,424 County seat: Astoria, Population: 10,130 County established: 22 June 1844 Located on the south bank of the lower Columbia River where it enters the Pacific Ocean. Clatsop County was the site of the first white trading post in Oregon and therefore the earliest established cemetery. This was Fort Astoria founded in the spring of 1811 for the fur trade. It was occupied by the British in the fall of I 813 during the War of 1812 and was renamed Fort George. Returned to the Americans in 1818 and once again called Fort Astoria, the name was gradually transferred to a small civilian settlement as Astoria. The earliest burials after 1811 and those dating from the 1850's to about 1878 are now built over. Eventually most of Astoria's known burials were transferred to Ocean View which was established in 1872. The Clatsop Plains Pioneer Cemetery was begun in 1846 and is the earliest organized cemetery outside of Astoria. By the 1870's there were at least four other organized cemeteries. There were many family burial sites and still some Indian burials sites and a United States Military cemetery begun as early as 1868 at Fort Stevens. The most prominent ethnic nationalities from Europe were Finns and Swedes who are scattered through many cemeteries and family burial sites.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOTEXTILE TUBE and GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL for COASTAL PROTECTION an ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3
    PIANC-World Congress Panama City, Panama 2018 GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL FOR COASTAL PROTECTION AN ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3 ABSTRACT The present study deals with a site-specific innovative solution executed in the northeast coastline of Odisha in India. The retarded embankment which had been maintained yearly by traditional means of ‘bullah piling’ and sandbags, proved ineffective and got washed away for a stretch of 350 meters in 2011. About the site condition, it is required to design an efficient coastal protection system prevailing to a low soil bearing capacity and continuously exposed to tides and waves. The erosion of existing embankment at Pentha ( Odisha ) has necessitated the construction of a retarded embankment. Conventional hard engineered materials for coastal protection are more expensive since they are not readily available near to the site. Moreover, they have not been found suitable for prevailing in in-situ marine environment and soil condition. Geosynthetics are innovative solutions for coastal erosion and protection are cheap, quickly installable when compared to other materials and methods. Therefore, a geotextile tube seawall was designed and built for a length of 505 m as soft coastal protection structure. A scaled model (1:10) study of geotextile tube configurations with and without gabion box structure is examined for the better understanding of hydrodynamic characteristics for such configurations. The scaled model in the mentioned configuration was constructed using woven geotextile fabric as geo tubes. The gabion box was made up of eco-friendly polypropylene tar-coated rope and consists of small rubble stones which increase the porosity when compared to the conventional monolithic rubble mound.
    [Show full text]
  • Linktm Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet
    LinkTM Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet www.globalsynthetics.com.au Australian Company - Global Expertise Contents 1. Introduction to Link Gabions and Mattresses ................................................... 1 1.1 Brief history ...............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applications ..............................................................................................................................1 1.3 Features of woven mesh Link Gabion and Mattress structures ...............................................2 1.4 Product characteristics of Link Gabions and Mattresses .........................................................2 2. Link Gabions and Mattresses .............................................................................. 4 2.1 Types of Link Gabions and Mattresses .....................................................................................4 2.2 General specification for Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link netting...............................4 2.3 Standard sizes of Link Gabions, Mattresses and Netting ........................................................6 2.4 Durability of Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link Netting ..................................................7 2.5 Geotextile filter specification ....................................................................................................7 2.6 Rock infill specification .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • GEOTEXTILE TUBE and GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL for COASTAL PROTECTION an ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3
    PIANC-World Congress Panama City, Panama 2018 GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL FOR COASTAL PROTECTION AN ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3 ABSTRACT The present study deals with a site-specific innovative solution executed in the northeast coastline of Odisha in India. The retarded embankment which had been maintained yearly by traditional means of ‘bullah piling’ and sandbags, proved ineffective and got washed away for a stretch of 350 meters in 2011. About the site condition, it is required to design an efficient coastal protection system prevailing to a low soil bearing capacity and continuously exposed to tides and waves. The erosion of existing embankment at Pentha ( Odisha ) has necessitated the construction of a retarded embankment. Conventional hard engineered materials for coastal protection are more expensive since they are not readily available near to the site. Moreover, they have not been found suitable for prevailing in in-situ marine environment and soil condition. Geosynthetics are innovative solutions for coastal erosion and protection are cheap, quickly installable when compared to other materials and methods. Therefore, a geotextile tube seawall was designed and built for a length of 505 m as soft coastal protection structure. A scaled model (1:10) study of geotextile tube configurations with and without gabion box structure is examined for the better understanding of hydrodynamic characteristics for such configurations. The scaled model in the mentioned configuration was constructed using woven geotextile fabric as geo tubes. The gabion box was made up of eco-friendly polypropylene tar-coated rope and consists of small rubble stones which increase the porosity when compared to the conventional monolithic rubble mound.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 213 the Impacts of Shoreline Protection
    CHAPTER 213 THE IMPACTS OF SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES ON BEACHES ALONG MONTEREY BAY, CALB^ORNIA GaryB. Griggs* James F. Tait* Katherine Scott* Abstract As a result of severe coastal storm damage in recent years along the California coast and the continuation of development and redevelopment in hazard prone oceanfront areas, large numbers of coastal protection structures have been built. This same trend has been observed on the Atlantic and Gulf coasts as well. At present, fully 12%, or 130 miles of California's 1100 miles of shoreline have been armored. As the number of structures and their coastal frontage has increased, concern along the California coast and elsewhere has arisen in regard to the impacts of these protective structures on the adjacent beaches. Three Atlantic coast states (Maine, New Jersey, and North Carolina) have responded to this concern by establishing state-level policy which prohibits construction of any new "hard" protective structures. Although considerable laboratory scale research has been carried out on this problem, field work has been extremely limited. A study along the central California coast was initiated in order to resolve some of the most critical questions regarding the impacts of protection structures on beaches. Based on 4 years of precise, biweekly, shore- based surveys in the vicinity of different types of seawalls along the shoreline of northern Monterey Bay along the central California coast, some consistent beach changes have been documented. All of the changes observed to date have been seasonal and are best developed in the fall and winter months during the transition from summer swell to winter storm conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Komandorsky Zapovednik: Strengthening Community Reserve Relations on the Commander Islands
    No. 36 Summer 2004 Special issue: Russia’s Marine Protected Areas PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (A letter from the editors)......................................1 Komandorsky Zapovednik: Strengthening Community Reserve Relations on the Commander Islands......................................24 AN INTRODUCTION TO MARINE Lazovsky Zapovednik: PROTECTED AREAS Working to Create a Marine Buffer Zone...................................................28 MPAs: An Important Tool in Marine Conservation......…………………...2 Kurshskaya Kosa National Park: Tides of Change: Tracing the Development Preserving World Heritage on the Baltic Sea ..........................................30 of Marine Protected Areas in Russia .................................................................4 Dalnevostochny Morskoi Zapovednik: How Effective Are Our MPAs? Looking for Answers An Important Role to Play.........................................................................................6 with Russia’s First Marine Protected Area..................................................32 The Challenges that Lie Ahead.....................………………………………………………8 Russia’s Marine Biosphere Reserves......………………………………………………10 MPA Workshop Offers Opportunities for Dialogue..........................13 THE FUTURE Plans for the Future: Developing a Network of Marine Protected Areas .....................................................……....………………...35 CASE STUDIES An Introduction .............................................................................……....………………...14
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Giessow Testimony
    Raszka Shelley From: Gallagher Chuck Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:50 AM To: Raszka Shelley Subject: FW: testimony on HB 2183 Attachments: Cal-IPCNews_Winter2015.pdf From: Jason Giessow [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:49 AM To: Gallagher Chuck Subject: testimony on HB 2183 Hi Chuck- I was the primary author on this Impact Assessment for CA. It is posted at this web site: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/research/arundo/index.php Basically- no one should be growing Arundo, it is destroying riverine systems in CA and Texas. There are entire conferences about how to control Arundo and tamarisk (the Deadly Duo). In the report is a CBA for coastal watersheds in CA and estimates $380 million dollars in damage . It destroys habitat- but also severely impacts flooding, fire, and water (the impact report has a chapter on each). That is why folks from both sides of the isle work on eradicating this plant. Planting it for commercial use is exceedingly dangerous, should be banned, or bonded at very high levels. CA has spent about $100 million dollars dealing with Arundo and its impacts (mostly state bond funds dealing with water: conservation, conveyance, and improvement). New state funding (Proposition 1) for water conservation and river conveyance will likely increase state funding for Arundo control to over $200 million dollars. Don’t let Oregon follow this trajectory. This recent article (attached- page 10) on the Salinas River Arundo program is one example of the impacts caused by Arundo, the complicated regulatory approval required to work on the issue, the high cost of the program, and most important- the farmers and landowners who pay the price for the impacts caused by Arundo (flooding, less water, fire, etc….).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Clatsop by Unknown This Photo Shows a Replica of Fort Clatsop, the Modest Structure in Which the Corps of Discovery Spent the Winter of 1805-1806
    Fort Clatsop By Unknown This photo shows a replica of Fort Clatsop, the modest structure in which the Corps of Discovery spent the winter of 1805-1806. Probably built of fir and spruce logs, the fort measured only fifty feet by fifty feet, not a lot of space for more than thirty people. Nevertheless, it served its purpose well, offering Expedition members shelter from the incessant rains of the coast and giving them security against the Native peoples in the area. Although the Corps named the fort after the local Indians, they did not fully trust either the Clatsop or the related Chinook people, and kept both at arms length throughout their stay on the coast. The time at Fort Clatsop was well spent by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark. The captains caught up on their journal entries and worked on maps of the territory they had traversed since leaving St. Louis in May 1804. Many of the captains’ most important observations about the natural history and Native cultures of the Columbia River region date from this period. Other Expedition members hunted the abundant elk in the area, stood guard over the fort, prepared animal hides, or boiled seawater to make salt, but mostly they bided their time, eagerly anticipating returning east at the first sign of spring. The Corps set off in late March 1806, leaving the fort to Coboway, headman of the Clatsop. In a 1901 letter to writer Eva Emery Dye, a pioneer by the name of Joe Dobbins noted that the remains of Fort Clatsop were still evident in the 1850s, but “not a vestige of the fort was to be seen” when he visited Clatsop Plains in the summer of 1886.
    [Show full text]