Tortuguero Integrated Bird Monitoring Project Bird-A-Thon: November 20, 2008
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Territory Size and Stability in a Sedentary Neotropical Passerine: Is Resource Partitioning a Necessary Condition?
J. Field Ornithol. 76(4):395±401, 2005 Territory size and stability in a sedentary neotropical passerine: is resource partitioning a necessary condition? Janet V. Gorrell,1 Gary Ritchison,1,3 and Eugene S. Morton2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475 USA 2 Hemlock Hill Field Station, 22318 Teepleville Flats Road, Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania 16403 USA Received 9 April 2004; accepted 11 April 2005 ABSTRACT. Long-term pair bonds and defense of territories year-round are common among tropical passer- ines. The boundaries of these territories tend to be stable, perhaps re¯ecting the need to defend an area that, regardless of conditions, provides suf®cient food resources. If, however, these stable territories are not, even tem- porarily, suf®ciently large, then intra-pair competition for available food may result, particularly in species with no sexual size dimorphism. With such competition, sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior may result. Male and female Dusky Antbirds (Cercomacra tyrannina) are not size dimorphic, and pairs jointly defend territories throughout the year. Our objective was to determine if paired Dusky Antbirds exhibited sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior. Foraging antbirds were observed in central Panama from February±July 2002 to determine if pairs par- titioned food resources. Males and females exhibited no differences in foraging behavior, with individuals of both sexes foraging at similar heights and using the same foraging maneuvers (glean, probe, and sally) and substrates (leaves, rolled leaves, and woody surfaces). These results suggest that Dusky Antbirds do not partition resources and that territory switching, rather than resource partitioning, may be the means by which they gain access to additional food resources. -
Antbird Guilds in the Lowland Caribbean Rainforest of Southeast Nicaragua1
The Condor 102:7X4-794 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 2000 ANTBIRD GUILDS IN THE LOWLAND CARIBBEAN RAINFOREST OF SOUTHEAST NICARAGUA1 MARTIN L. CODY Department of OrganismicBiology, Ecology and Evolution, Universityof California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Some 20 speciesof antbirdsoccur in lowland Caribbeanrainforest in southeast Nicaragua where they form five distinct guilds on the basis of habitat preferences,foraging ecology, and foraging behavior. Three guilds are habitat-based,in Edge, Forest, and Gaps within forest; two are behaviorally distinct, with species of army ant followers and those foraging within mixed-species flocks. The guilds each contain 3-6 antbird species. Within guilds, species are segregatedby body size differences between member species, and in several guilds are evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale of body mass. Among guilds, the factors by which adjacent body sizes differ vary between 1.25 and 1.75. Body size differ- ences may be related to differences in preferred prey sizes, but are influenced also by the density of the vegetation in which each speciescustomarily forages. Resumen. Unas 20 especies de aves hormiguerasviven en el bosque tropical perenni- folio, surestede Nicaragua, donde se forman cinquo gremios distinctos estribando en pre- ferencias de habitat, ecologia y comportamiento de las costumbresde alimentacion. Las diferenciasentre las varias especiesson cuantificadaspor caractaristicasde1 ambiente vegetal y por la ecologia y comportamientode la alimentaci6n, y usadospara definir cinco grupos o gremios (“guilds”). Tres gremios se designanpor las relacionesde habitat: edge (margen), forest (selva), y gaps (aberturasadentro la selva); dos mas por comportamiento,partidarios de army ants (hormigasarmadas) y mixed-speciesflocks (forrejando en bandadasde especies mexcladas). -
Vocal Duetting Behaviour in a Neotropical Wren: Insights Into Paternity Guarding and Parental Commitment
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship at UWindsor University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 10-5-2017 Vocal duetting behaviour in a neotropical wren: Insights into paternity guarding and parental commitment Zach Alexander Kahn University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Kahn, Zach Alexander, "Vocal duetting behaviour in a neotropical wren: Insights into paternity guarding and parental commitment" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 7268. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7268 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. VOCAL DUETTING BEHAVIOUR IN A NEOTROPICAL WREN: INSIGHTS INTO PATERNITY GUARDING AND PARENTAL COMMITMENT By ZACHARY ALEXANDER KAHN A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the Department of Biological Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at the University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada 2017 © Zachary A. -
Checklistccamp2016.Pdf
2 3 Participant’s Name: Tour Company: Date#1: / / Tour locations Date #2: / / Tour locations Date #3: / / Tour locations Date #4: / / Tour locations Date #5: / / Tour locations Date #6: / / Tour locations Date #7: / / Tour locations Date #8: / / Tour locations Codes used in Column A Codes Sample Species a = Abundant Red-lored Parrot c = Common White-headed Wren u = Uncommon Gray-cheeked Nunlet r = Rare Sapayoa vr = Very rare Wing-banded Antbird m = Migrant Bay-breasted Warbler x = Accidental Dwarf Cuckoo (E) = Endemic Stripe-cheeked Woodpecker Species marked with an asterisk (*) can be found in the birding areas visited on the tour outside of the immediate Canopy Camp property such as Nusagandi, San Francisco Reserve, El Real and Darien National Park/Cerro Pirre. Of course, 4with incredible biodiversity and changing environments, there is always the possibility to see species not listed here. If you have a sighting not on this list, please let us know! No. Bird Species 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tinamous Great Tinamou u 1 Tinamus major Little Tinamou c 2 Crypturellus soui Ducks Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 3 Dendrocygna autumnalis u Muscovy Duck 4 Cairina moschata r Blue-winged Teal 5 Anas discors m Curassows, Guans & Chachalacas Gray-headed Chachalaca 6 Ortalis cinereiceps c Crested Guan 7 Penelope purpurascens u Great Curassow 8 Crax rubra r New World Quails Tawny-faced Quail 9 Rhynchortyx cinctus r* Marbled Wood-Quail 10 Odontophorus gujanensis r* Black-eared Wood-Quail 11 Odontophorus melanotis u Grebes Least Grebe 12 Tachybaptus dominicus u www.canopytower.com 3 BirdChecklist No. -
Tropical Forests Surround - Data Sheet Tropical Forests
TROPICAL FORESTS SURROUND - DATA SHEET TROPICAL FORESTS FILENAME DESCRIPTION QP07 0672 Trop forest EC evening 5.0.wav Evening insects, few bird calls, winged insects. Birds include Gilded Barbet, White-throated Tinamou and Black-necked Red-Cotinga. QP07 0673 Trop forest EC nightfall 5.0.wav Evening insect rhythms, frogs, drips, debris falling, occasional bird, light is quickly weakening. Birds include Undulated Tinamou and Tawny-bellied Screech-Owl. Evening insect rhythms, frogs, Red Howler Monkey distant and becoming louder, occasional water drips with winged insects, animal lurks in vicinity. Birds include Gilded Barbet and Undulated QP07 0674 Trop forest EC nightfall 5.0.wav Tinamou. Pronounced insect rhythms at night with occasional bird calls and wing flutters, winged insects, sparse frogs, water drips. Birds include Red-throated Caracara, Thrush-like Antpitta, Brown Nunlet QP07 0675 Trop forest EC night early 5.0.wav and Variegated Tinamou. Night insect rhythms dense, increasing at times, large frog with two note call, night birds in background include Tawny-bellied Screech-Owl and Crested Owl. Faint water ripples produced by nearby QP07 0676 Trop forest EC night 5.0.wav river. QP07 0677 Trop forest EC night 5.0.wav Night insect rhythms and loud frogs with sparse drips, bat wing flutters. QP07 0678 Trop forest EC night 5.0.wav Night insect rhythms, night birds, jaguar lurks then hisses, frog. Birds include Black-banded Owls counter-calling throughout sometimes simultaneously with Tawny-bellied Screech-Owl. QP07 0679 Trop forest EC night zephyr 5.0.wav Night insect rhythms, frog chirps and gecko multi-note call, series of whoops in background probably a frog. -
Breeding Biology of Yellow-Browed Antbird Hypocnemis Hypoxantha
Daniel M. Brooks et al. 156 Bull. B.O.C. 2016 136(3) Breeding biology of Yellow-browed Antbird Hypocnemis hypoxantha by Daniel M. Brooks, Pablo Aibar, Pam Bucur, Ron Rossi & Harold F. Greeney Received 17 February 2016 Summary.—We provide novel data concerning the nests, eggs and parental care of Yellow-browed Antbird Hypocnemis hypoxantha based on two nests in eastern Ecuador and Peruvian Amazonia, one of which was video-taped. Both adults participated in incubation, with earliest and latest feeding events at 06.11 h and 17.22 h, respectively. Feeding behaviour is described, with intervals of 1–114 minutes (mean = 38.3 minutes) and tettigoniid cicadas the primary prey. Nestlings frequently produced faecal sacs (interval range = 4–132 minutes, mean = 37.8 minutes) immediately following food delivery, and the sac was always carried from the nest by an adult. Two events involving a parent bird being chased from the nest are described, the first involving a male Fulvous Antshrike Frederickena fulva. Systematics are discussed in light of nest morphology and architecture. Yellow-browed Antbird Hypocnemis hypoxantha is a distinctive Amazonian thamnophilid that comprises two currently recognised subspecies: nominate hypoxantha in western Amazonian lowland and foothill forests from southern Colombia south to central Peru, and H. h. ochraceiventris in south-east Amazonian Brazil (Zimmer & Isler 2003). Generally found below 400 m, the nominate subspecies occasionally ranges as high as 900 m (Zimmer & Isler 2003, Ridgely & Tudor 2009). The species’ reproductive biology is almost completely unknown (Zimmer & Isler 2003). Willis (1988) provided a cursory description of a nest with nestlings from Colombia, but included few details of the nest and no description of the eggs or behaviour. -
The All-Bird Bulletin
Advancing Integrated Bird Conservation in North America Spring 2014 Inside this issue: The All-Bird Bulletin Protecting Habitat for 4 the Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Bolivia The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Conserving the “Jewels 6 Act (NMBCA): Thirteen Years of Hemispheric in the Crown” for Neotropical Migrants Bird Conservation Guy Foulks, Program Coordinator, Division of Bird Habitat Conservation, U.S. Fish and Bird Conservation in 8 Wildlife Service (USFWS) Costa Rica’s Agricultural Matrix In 2000, responding to alarming declines in many Neotropical migratory bird popu- Uruguayan Rice Fields 10 lations due to habitat loss and degradation, Congress passed the Neotropical Migra- as Wintering Habitat for tory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA). The legislation created a unique funding Neotropical Shorebirds source to foster the cooperative conservation needed to sustain these species through all stages of their life cycles, which occur throughout the Western Hemi- Conserving Antigua’s 12 sphere. Since its first year of appropriations in 2002, the NMBCA has become in- Most Critical Bird strumental to migratory bird conservation Habitat in the Americas. Neotropical Migratory 14 Bird Conservation in the The mission of the North American Bird Heart of South America Conservation Initiative is to ensure that populations and habitats of North Ameri- Aros/Yaqui River Habi- 16 ca's birds are protected, restored, and en- tat Conservation hanced through coordinated efforts at in- ternational, national, regional, and local Strategic Conservation 18 levels, guided by sound science and effec- in the Appalachians of tive management. The NMBCA’s mission Southern Quebec is to achieve just this for over 380 Neo- tropical migratory bird species by provid- ...and more! Cerulean Warbler, a Neotropical migrant, is a ing conservation support within and be- USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern and listed as yond North America—to Latin America Vulnerable on the International Union for Conser- Coordination and editorial vation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. -
ON (19) 599-606.Pdf
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 19: 599–606, 2008 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society BODY MASSES OF BIRDS FROM ATLANTIC FOREST REGION, SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL Iubatã Paula de Faria1 & William Sousa de Paula PPG-Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Massa corpórea de aves da região de Floresta Atlântica, sudeste do Brasil. Key words: Neotropical birds, weight, body mass, tropical rainforest, Brazil. The Brazilian Atlantic forest is one of the In this paper, we present the values of biodiversity hotspots in the world (Myers body masses of birds captured or collected 1988, Myers et al. 2000) with high endemism using mist-nets in 17 localities in the Atlantic of bird species (Cracraft 1985, Myers et al. forest of southeastern Brazil (Table 1), 2000). Nevertheless, there is little information between 2004 and 2007. Data for sites 1, 2, 3, on the avian body masses (weight) for this and 5 were collected in January, April, August, region (Oniki 1981, Dunning 1992, Belton and December 2004; in March and April 2006 1994, Reinert et al. 1996, Sick 1997, Oniki & for sites 4, 6, 7, and 8. Others sites were col- Willis 2001, Bugoni et al. 2002) and for other lected in September 2007. The Atlantic forest Neotropical ecosystems (Fry 1970, Oniki region is composed by two major vegetation 1980, 1990; Dick et al. 1984, Salvador 1988, types: Atlantic rain forest (low to medium ele- 1990; Peris 1990, Dunning 1992, Cavalcanti & vations, = 1000 m); and Atlantic semi-decidu- Marini 1993, Marini et al. 1997, Verea et al. ous forest (usually > 600 m) (Morellato & 1999, Oniki & Willis 1999). -
REGUA Bird List July 2020.Xlsx
Birds of REGUA/Aves da REGUA Updated July 2020. The taxonomy and nomenclature follows the Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos (CBRO), Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee, updated June 2015 - based on the checklist of the South American Classification Committee (SACC). Atualizado julho de 2020. A taxonomia e nomenclatura seguem o Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos (CBRO), Lista anotada das aves do Brasil pelo Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos, atualizada em junho de 2015 - fundamentada na lista do Comitê de Classificação da América do Sul (SACC). -
Foraging Niche Structure and Coexistence in a Highly Diverse Community Of
Foraging niche structure and coexistence in a highly diverse community of Amazonian antbirds (Thamnophilidae: Aves) by SANTIAGO DAVID B.Sc, Universidad de Antioquia, 2011 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Zoology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2016 © Santiago David, 2016 Abstract The high species richness of antbirds (Thamnophilidae) in Amazonian lowlands, where as many as 40 species may coexist at local scales, represents a major challenge for ecologists to explain patterns of coexistence and niche evolution. I studied the foraging ecology of a local community of antbirds in a 2-Km2 area of lowland forest in SE Peru to examine how co- occurring antbird species differ in their use of foraging resources, and whether these differences result in niche partitioning at the community level. I also examined whether resource use similarity was related to phylogenetic similarity in this local assemblage. Forty-four species of antbirds were detected in the study plot in a four-year period, with 30 species categorized as the local assemblage of common resident breeders. Multivariate analysis of foraging parameters showed that segregation at two height layers in two types of forest was more important than foraging substrates and maneuvers in explaining the differences observed in foraging behavior. However, a null model analysis revealed that at the community level, antbirds exhibited high foraging niche overlap, with average observed overlap significantly larger than expected by chance, indicating that antbirds prefer, rather than avoid, resources used by other species. -
First Record of Tropical Kingbirds Nesting in Mesquite in Arizona
Arizona Birds Online Volume 2016 FIRST RECORD OF TROPICAL KINGBIRDS NESTING IN MESQUITE IN ARIZONA DOUG JENNESS, 4375 E. Rollins Rd., Tucson, AZ 85739, [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Tropical Kingbird (Tyrannus melancholicus), a widely distributed tyrant flycatcher in the Americas, breeds in the United States in southern Arizona and southern and western Texas (Stouffer and Chesser 1998, Brush 2005). Its breeding range in Arizona has been increasing over the past several decades (Corman 2005, Jenness 2015). The most favored breeding site for Tropical Kingbirds in Arizona is the tops of larger Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontii), often near bodies of water (Phillips et al. 1964, Monson and Phillips 1981, Corman 2005). It also has been reported nesting in pecan trees (Carya illinoinensis), particularly rows of trees along roadsides in agricultural areas (Corman 2005, Jenness 2015), and at least once each in athel tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla) (Corman 2005) and Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia) in 2014 at Willcox (eBird 2012). Throughout its extensive range this species favors locations with open edges by ponds, rivers, fields, golf courses, etc. Within this context, it utilizes a wide range of nesting sites. In Texas, for example, in addition to cottonwood, Washingtonian palm (Washingtonia robusta), Texas ebony (Pithecellobium ebano), and other tall trees, it is known to construct its nest in artificial structures such as power poles, electric substations, and football stadiums (Stouffer and Chesser 1998, Brush 2005). In Sonora, the Mexican state south of Arizona, it frequently nests in mangroves (Rhizophora sp.) in coastal areas and in cottonwoods along riparian belts farther north (Russell and Monson 1998). -
Pine-Oak-Hemlock--Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 1
Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 Predicted Responses of Wildlife to Silvicultural Treatments with special focus on Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock Types Matt Tarr Associate Extension Professor, Wildlife Specialist University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension Northeast Silviculture Institute for Foresters June 18, 2017 What am I talking about? OUTLINE • Overview of the primary factors that determine how wildlife respond to timber harvesting • Overview of how birds, mammals, reptiles & amphibians select their habitat • Summary of expected wildlife response following application of silvicultural treatments in pine‐oak‐hemlock MY GOAL: Help you become better at predicting how wildlife will respond to the decisions you make when managing forested habitats 1 Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 When we cut trees, the response by wildlife is determined primarily by: • Plant species • Plant structure composition following the harvest • The size of the canopy opening • Whether soils are • Presence/absence of • Habitats in the dry/moist/wet special habitat features surrounding landscape “Plant structure” = presence & density of plants in each forest layer • What plant layers are present? Canopy layer >30’ Midstory layer 10-30’ Shrub layer 2-10’ Herbaceous layer 0-2’ • How dense are the plants in each layer? SPARSE INTERMEDIATE ABUNDANT/DENSE < 30% coverage 30-75% coverage > 75% coverage 2 Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 Role of plant structure in influencing wildlife use of forest stands Forest stands comprised